Next Article in Journal
N-3 Long-Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids, Eicosapentaenoic and Docosahexaenoic Acid, and the Role of Supplementation during Cancer Treatment: A Scoping Review of Current Clinical Evidence
Previous Article in Journal
Targeting KRAS in Cancer: Promising Therapeutic Strategies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 13
Issue 6
10.3390/cancers13061205
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dual Inhibition of AKT and MEK Pathways Potentiates the Anti-Cancer Effect of Gefitinib in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells

by
Kyu Sic You
1,2,†,
Yong Weon Yi
3,†,‡,
Jeonghee Cho
3,* and
Yeon-Sun Seong
1,2,3,*
1
Graduate School of Convergence Medical Science, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea
2
Department of Biochemistry, College of Medicine, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea
3
Department of Nanobiomedical Science, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
‡
Current address: ExoCoBio Inc., Seoul 08594, Korea.
Cancers 2021, 13(6), 1205; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13061205
Submission received: 23 January 2021 / Revised: 28 February 2021 / Accepted: 7 March 2021 / Published: 10 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Therapy)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an intractable subset of breast cancer without an efficient therapeutic strategy due to the lack of tractable targets, such as the estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. Activation and/or amplification of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog (AKT), and MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK)/ extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathways is known in TNBC; however, interventions for these targets have not been successful to date. To explore a combinatorial strategy with existing clinical/preclinical protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) in TNBC cells, we performed a series of cytotoxicity (cell viability) screenings with various PKIs in the presence figure of an EGFR inhibitor, gefitinib. The dual inhibition of AKT and MEK with gefitinib reduced the proliferation and colony formation of TNBC cells by inducing apoptosis. Our finding suggests a new approach for treating TNBC with a multiplex combination of PKIs.

Abstract

There is an unmet medical need for the development of new targeted therapeutic strategies for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). With drug combination screenings, we found that the triple combination of the protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog (AKT), and MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK) is effective in inducing apoptosis in TNBC cells. A set of PKIs were first screened in combination with gefitinib in the TNBC cell line, MDA-MB-231. The AKT inhibitor, AT7867, was identified and further analyzed in two mesenchymal stem-like (MSL) subtype TNBC cells, MDA-MB-231 and HS578T. A combination of gefitinib and AT7867 reduced the proliferation and long-term survival of MSL TNBC cells. However, gefitinib and AT7867 induced the activation of the rat sarcoma (RAS)/ v-raf-1 murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog (RAF)/MEK/ extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway. To inhibit this pathway, MEK/ERK inhibitors were further screened in MDA-MB-231 cells in the presence of gefitinib and AT7867. As a result, we identified that the MEK inhibitor, PD-0325901, further enhanced the anti-proliferative and anti-clonogenic effects of gefitinib and AT7867 by inducing apoptosis. Our results suggest that the dual inhibition of the AKT and MEK pathways is a novel potential therapeutic strategy for targeting EGFR in TNBC cells.

1. Introduction

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is defined clinically as being negative for both the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) and having no amplification of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) [1,2]. Therefore, the therapeutic options that feature drugs targeting these proteins are not available for TNBC patients. TNBC accounts for approximately 15–20% of breast cancers and is known as the most aggressive breast cancer [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Although TNBCs respond well to conventional adjuvant chemotherapies, including taxanes, anthracyclines, capecitabines, and/or platins, resistance to these agents and distant metastasis diminish overall prognosis [7,8,9,10]. Experimental therapeutics against specific targets, such as acetylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) and mutant p53 in TNBC cells, have been developed [11,12,13]. Up to date, four targeted therapies have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). These therapies include the poly [adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribose] polymerase 1 (PARP1) inhibitors, olaparib and talazoparib; the programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L) inhibitor, atezolizumab; and antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), sacituzumab govitecan [2]. However, most treatments exhibit limited durable clinical responses [2].
The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a member of the human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) family, which consists of four receptor tyrosine kinases that are important for the proliferation and survival of normal cells [14,15,16]. EGFR is activated via epidermal growth factor (EGF) binding, which then promotes intracellular signaling pathways, such as rat sarcoma (RAS)/v-raf-1 murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog (RAF)/MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and v-src avian sarcoma (Schmidt-Ruppin A-2) viral oncogene homolog (SRC)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) [17,18,19]. Activation of EGFR, that caused by EGFR gene amplification or mutations, or protein overexpression, or point mutations has been reported in many cancer types. EGFR is a well-established therapeutic target; many small-molecule kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies have been approved for treating several human cancers by the US FDA [15,16]. High EGFR expression has been reported in >50% of TNBC, which is associated with a poor prognosis [1,3,14,15,20]. Lehmann et al. have classified TNBC into six subtypes and shown that two of them have the active EGFR pathway: basal-like 2 (BL2) and mesenchymal stem-like (MSL) subtypes [5]. However, TNBC has displayed intrinsic resistance to anti-EGFR therapeutics [3,20]. One possible explanation is that most TNBCs are not solely dependent on the EGFR pathway for their survival because of rare EGFR-activating mutations [3]. Most anti-EGFR therapeutics are effective in cancers that have activated mutations in EGFR.
Combining existing therapeutics is a promising way to treat intractable cancers, such as pancreatic cancer or TNBC [2,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. For example, blocking the PI3K/AKT pathway [25], MET [30], or mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) [33] sensitized TNBC cells to EGFR inhibitors (EGFRis). A combination of EGFRi, gefitinib, or erlotinib with PI3K/AKT inhibitors resulted in the synergism of an anti-proliferative effect in the cell lines of the BL subtype [25]. However, these combinations have no synergism in the MSL subtype cell lines. Additionally, we determined that co-treatment with the MET inhibitor (METi), SU11274, and EGFRis has a synthetic lethality in MSL TNBC cells though the downregulation of ribosomal protein S6 (RPS6) [30]. Additionally, inhibiting the mTORC1 pathway via the AKT inhibitor, MK2206, or blocking the regulatory-associated protein of mTOR (RPTOR) with small interfering RNA (siRNA) potentiated gefitinib toxicity in TNBC cells [33]. Recently, more efficacious treatments for TNBC have been suggested that use a triple combination of drugs targeting multiple pathways simultaneously, such as redox homeostasis, DNA synthesis, DNA damage, histone deacetylase, and multiple protein kinases [35,36,37]. A drug combination discovery involving 33 FDA-approved PKIs revealed that the triple combination of dasatinib, afatinib (BIBW-2992), and trametinib (GSK1120212) was anti-proliferative in TNBC cells by inhibiting SRC, HER2/EGFR, and MEK [37,38,39,40].
In this paper, we showed that the dual blocking of the AKT and MEK pathways sensitized TNBC cells to the EGFRi, gefitinib. A set of small-molecule PKIs were screened in combination with gefitinib for the MSL subtype cell, MDA-MB-231. An AKT inhibitor (AKTi), AT7867, was identified as the most potent inhibitor, which we further analyzed using two MSL subtype TNBC cells, MDA-MB-231 and HS578T. A combination of gefitinib and AT7867 reduced the proliferation and long-term survival of MSL TNBC cells. However, gefitinib and AT7867 (hereafter referred to as Gefi+AT7867) induced the activation of the MEK/ERK pathway. Blocking this pathway with the MEK inhibitor (MEKi), PD-0325901, further enhanced the anti-cancer effect of Gefi+AT7867. Our results suggest that the dual inhibition of the AKT and MEK pathways is a potential therapeutic strategy for targeting EGFR in TNBC cells.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture and Reagents

The MDA-MB-231 and HS578T cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA). Cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Corning, Manassas, VA, USA) and 100 units/mL penicillin/streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The viability of cultured cells were monitored by the Trypan Blue dye exclusion method using an automated cell counter, as described previously [41]. The PKIs used in this study were reported in Table 1.
Table
Table 1. Protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) used in 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) screening.
Table 1. Protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) used in 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) screening.
PKIOther NameKnown Targets (IC50 Value in nM)SourceRef
A-769662 AMPK (800; EC50)LC Laboratories (Woburn, MA, USA)[42]
AT7867 AKT2 (17), PKA (20), AKT1 (32), AKT3 (47), p70S6K (85)Selleck Chemicals (Houston, TX, USA)[43]
AT9283 JAK3 (1.1), JAK2 (1.2), AURKA (~3.0), AURKB (~3.0), ABL1T315I (4)[44]
AZD1152-HQPABarasertib, AZD2811AURKB (0.37)[45]
AZD1480 JAK2 (0.26)[46]
BI 2536 PLK1 (0.83), PLK2 (3.5)[47,48]
BIX 02189 MEK5 (1.5)[49]
BML-275Dorsomorphin, Compound CAMPK (109; Ki)Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, UK)[50]
BosutinibSKI-606ABL (1), SRC (1.2)LC Laboratories[51,52]
Chelerythrine PKC (660)[53]
CHIR-99021CT99021GSK3β (6.7), GSK3α (10)Selleck Chemicals[54]
CI-1040PD184352MEK1 (17), MEK2 (17)[55]
CP690550TofacitinibJAK3 (1), JAK2 (20)LC Laboratories[56]
CYC116 AURKA (8; Ki), AURKB (9; Ki), VEGFR2 (44; Ki), FLT3 (44; Ki)Selleck Chemicals[57]
DanusertibPHA-739358AURKA (13), ABL (25), RET (31), TRKA (31), FGFR1 (47), AURKC (61), AURKB (79)[58]
EnzastaurinLY317615PKCβ (6), PKCα (39), PKCγ (83), PKCε (110)[59]
FasudilHA-1077ROCK2 (330)LC Laboratories[60]
FR 180204 ERK2 (140), ERK1 (310)Tocris Bioscience[61]
GDC-0879AR-00341677BRAF (0.13)Selleck Chemicals[62]
GW 843682X PLK1 (2.2), PLK3 (9.1)Tocris Bioscience[63]
I3M GSK3β (190)Calbiochem (San Diego, CA, USA)[64]
IKK 16IKK Inhibitor VIIIKK2 (40), IKK complex (70), IKK1 (200)Tocris Bioscience[65]
ImatinibSTI571, CGP057148B, GleevecPDGFR (100), c-KIT (100), v-ABL (600)LC Laboratories[66]
INCB018424RuxolitinibJAK2 (2.8), JAK1 (3.3)Selleck Chemicals[67]
JNJ-7706621 CDK2/Cyclin E (3), CDK2/Cyclin A (4), CDK1/Cyclin B (9), AURKA (11), AURKB (15)[68]
KU-55933 ATM (12.9)[69]
LY2228820RalimetinibP38α (7)[70]
MLN8237AlisertibAURKA (1.2)[71]
NilotinibAMN-107Bcr-Abl (<30)LC Laboratories[72]
NSC 109555 CHK2 (200)Tocris Bioscience[73]
NU 7441KU-57788DNA-PK (14)[74]
PD-0325901MirdametinibMEK (0.33)Selleck Chemicals[75]
PD407824 CHK1 (47), WEE1 (97)Tocris Bioscience[76]
PF-4708671 p70S6K1 (160)Selleck Chemicals[77]
PF 573228 FAK (4)Tocris Bioscience[78]
PKC412Midostaurin, CGP 41251PKCα (22), PKCγ (24), PKCβ1 (30), PKCβ2 (31), PPK (38)LC Laboratories[79]
PLX-4032VemurafenibSRMS (18), ACK (19), BRAF (31), C-RAF (48), MAP4K5 (51)Selleck Chemicals[80]
PLX-4720 BRAFV600E (13), C-RAF1Y340D/Y341D (6.7)[81]
Ro-31-8220Bisindolylmaleimide IXPKCα (5), PKCβ2 (14), PKCβ1 (24), PKCε (24), PKCγ (27)Calbiochem[82]
RoscovitineSeliciclib, CYC202CDK5/P35 (160)LC Laboratories[83]
SB216763 GSK3α (34.3), GSK3β (~34.3)Selleck Chemicals[84]
SB 218078 CHK1 (15)Tocris Bioscience[85]
SNS-032BMS-387032CDK9/Cyclin T (4)Selleck Chemicals[86]
SNS-314 AURKC (3), AURKA (9), AURKB (31)[87]
SP600125NSC75890JNK1 (40), JNK2 (40), AURKA (60), TRKA (70)[88]
TBCA CK2 (110)Millipore (Burlington, MA, USA)[89]
TCS 2312 CHK1 (60; EC50)Tocris Bioscience[90]
TC PIM-1-1SC 204330PIM (50)[91]
TCS PIM-1-4aSMI-4aPIM1 (17)[92]
TozasertibVX-680, MK-0457AURKA (0.6; Ki), AURKC (4.6; Ki), AURKB (18; Ki), FLT3 (30; Ki), BCL-ABL (30; Ki)LC Laboratories[93,94]
TPCA-1GW683965IKK2 (17.9)Tocris Bioscience[95]
U0126 MEK2 (60), MEK1 (70)Promega (Madison, WI, USA)[96]
VX-702 P38α (4–20)Selleck Chemicals[97]
Y-27632 ROCK1 (140; Ki); ROCK2 (300; Ki)[98,99]
ZM-447439 AURKA (110), AURKB (130)[100]

2.2. PKI Screening

A synthetic lethality screening of PKIs was performed, as described previously [30,33]. Briefly, MDA-MB-231 cells were plated at 1000 cells/well in 96-well plates and incubated for 24 h. The cells were treated with increasing concentrations of gefitinib and PKIs in duplicate in a 6 × 5 matrix that included a dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) vehicle control. The viability of cells was determined at 72 h after treatment with 4 mg/mL of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), as described previously [11,25,101]. The classification index (CI) was calculated to determine synergism of the combination, as described previously [30,33]: CI = (viability with gefitinib) × (viability with PKI) / (viability with the gefitinib and PKI combo). CI > 1, supra-additivity; CI = 1, additivity; and CI < 1, sub-additivity. The numbers of combination points with CI > 1.3 were assigned as quantitative indices of synergism.

2.3. Clonogenic Survival Assay

Cells were seeded and cultured in 6-well plates, as described previously [33]. Cells in each well were treated with indicated drugs, and the colonies were stained with crystal violet solution as previously described [30]. After washing the colonies with distilled water, they were imaged with an image scanner.

2.4. Western Blot Analysis

For the treatment of PKI, the cells were plated at 2 × 105 cells/60-mm dish and incubated for approximately 24 h. Next, cells were treated with PKIs for 2 h or 24 h in normal growth media supplemented with FBS. Following treatment, the cells were lysed with a radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer containing a protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The protein concentration was measured via bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The antibodies used in this study as follows: mTOR, p-mTOR (S2448), ERK1/2, p-ERK1/2 (T202/Y204), RPS6, p-RPS6 (S235/236), AKT, p-AKT (S473), glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta (GSK3β), p-GSK3β (S9), p-p90 ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK) (S380), p90RSK, p-STAT3 (T705), STAT3, cleaved caspase-3, and peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (anti-rabbit IgG and anti-mouse IgG) from Cell Signaling Technology (Denver, MA, USA); XIAP from BD Sciences (San Jose, CA, USA); β-actin from Bethyl Laboratories (Montgomery, TX, USA); and β-tubulin from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MI, USA).

2.5. Cell Cycle Analysis

Cells were plated at 1 × 105 cells in 60-mm dishes one day before treatment. Following the drug treatment, both adherent and floating cells were collected and fixed using 70% ethanol, as described previously [33]. The nuclei were stained with propidium iodide (PI) (Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, MI, USA), and the DNA contents were determined using a FACSCalibur Flow Cytometer (BD Sciences; Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The data were analyzed using CellQuest Pro (BD Sciences; Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and the ModFit LTTM program (Verity Software House; Topsham, ME, USA).

2.6. Antibody Array

An antibody array analysis was performed by Fullmoon Biosystems (Sunnyvale, CA, USA) through ebiogen (Seoul, Korea). In brief, the protein extracts were purified by a gel matrix column. The protein extract quality was accessed via BCA protein assay with wavelength scanning using a spectrophotometer Model 680 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Fifty micrograms of each protein extract were used to label and probe the antibody array. Fluorescence signals were captured using the GenePix 4000B Microarray Scanner (Molecular Devices; San Jose, CA, USA). The signal intensity of each spot was normalized using global normalization.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed at least three times in triplicate. Representative data are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD). The differences between groups were determined by the One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a post-hoc Tukey’s honest significance difference (HSD) test. Data were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of AT7867 as a Potentiator of Gefitinib in MDA-MB-231 Cells

Previously, we identified a series of PKIs that potentiate TNBC cells’ sensitivity to EGFRis [25,30,33]. Our studies also revealed the differential susceptibility of EGFRis and PKI combinations in subtypes of TNBC cells in vitro; MSL subtype cells are more resistant to PI3K/AKTi and EGFRi combinations than BL subtype cells [25]. This may be due to alternative survival pathways [102,103,104,105,106,107]. To further identify synergistic anti-cancer effects in MSL TNBC cells that overcome EGFRi resistance, we performed a synthetic lethality MTT screening with a new set of PKIs in combination with the EGFRi, gefitinib, in MDA-MB-231 cells. Among 55 PKIs tested, AT7867 was identified as the most promising PKI with a CI larger than 1.3, in 8 combination points from the 6 × 5 combination matrix (Figure 1A,B). In addition, its mean CI was relatively high (1.95; Figure 1A). AT7867 is an adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-competitive small-molecule PKI of AKT and its downstream kinase, p70 S6 kinase (p70S6K), as well as of protein kinase A (PKA) [43]. The synergistic effect of AT7867 and gefitinib was observed in a series of concentrations at different combination ratios in MDA-MB-231 cells (Figure 1C). The synthetic lethal effect of AT7867 with gefitinib was also confirmed in an additional MSL cell, HS578T (Figure 1C).

3.2. Induction of Tetraploid Cells by AT7867

The effect of the Gefi+AT7867 treatment for 72 h on cell cycle distribution was determined in MDA-MB-231 cells. The cell cycle distribution was determined by flow cytometric analysis (Figure 2). Gefitinib treatment alone did not alter cell cycle progression in MDA-MD-231 cells; however, AT7867 induced an increase in the population of tetraploid cells (Figure 2A). Gefi+AT7867 further induced an increase of the gap 1 (G1) population with a concomitant reduction of the synthesis (S) and gap 2 (G2) populations in tetraploid cells (Figure 2B). Failures in spindle assembly, chromosome segregation, or cytokinesis followed by mitosis cause tetraploidy [108].

3.3. Gefitinib and AT7867 Reduced TNBC Cell Survival

The clonogenic long-term survival of cancer cells was determined to analyze the effect of Gefi+AT7867 treatment. MDA-MB-231 and HS578T cells were subcultured in 6-well plates and treated with drug combinations for 24 h. After washing, the cells were cultivated in normal growth media to form surviving colonies. As expected, gefitinib alone did not suppress the formation of colonies of MDA-MB-231 and HS578T cells (Figure 3A). In contrast to the MTT assay results, AT7867 alone markedly reduced the formation of colonies in both cell types, leading to <40% colony formation when compared with vehicle-treated control cells (Figure 3B). Gefi+AT7867 treatment further reduced the number of colonies in both cells, reaching a statistically significant difference compared with AT7867 alone in MDA-MB-231 cells, but not in HS578T cells. Unfortunately, the complete abolition of colony formation was not achieved by Gefi+AT7867 in either cell type under this condition.

3.4. Regulation of Signaling Pathways in TNBC Cells by Gefitinib and AT7867 Treatment

Next, we analyzed the signaling pathways modulated by the Gefi+AT7867 treatment in TNBC cells. As expected, a 2 h treatment of gefitinib was not sufficient to downregulate the AKT pathway, as evident by no significant reduction in the levels of phospho (p)-AKT [25], p-mTOR, and p-GSK3β in MDA-MB-231 and HS578T cells (Figure 4, left). However, the levels of p-RPS6 were reduced by gefitinib alone. Serine 235/236 residues of RPS6 are phosphorylated by multiple protein kinases, including S6 kinase (S6K), ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK), casein kinase 1 (CK1), and protein kinase A (PKA) [109]. The key signaling pathways of p-RPS6 (S235/236) are PI3K/AKT/mTORC1/S6K and RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK/RSK [109]; therefore, gefitinib-induced downregulation of p-RPS6 might be mediated by the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK/RSK pathway. However, the levels of p-ERK1/2 were increased by gefitinib treatment in MDA-MD-231 and HS578T cells. Additionally, gefitinib did not suppress the levels of p-STAT3 and p-p90RSK in these cells after a 2 h treatment.
AT7867 reduced the levels of p-mTOR, p-GSK3β, and p-RPS6 in these cells after 2 h of treatment. This suggests downregulation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR/S6K pathway by AT7867. There were no significant effects on the levels of p-ERK1/2 and p-STAT3. Taken together, these results support the specificity of AT7867 and the anti-proliferative and anti-clonogenic effects of AT7867 on MSL TNBC cells (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Surprisingly, the levels of p-AKT and p-p90RSK were upregulated by AT7867 in the cells treated for 2 h. The reactivation of the PI3K or ERK pathway through the relief of the negative feedback loops in cancer cell lines, when treated with PI3K and/or mTOR inhibitors, has been well established [110,111,112,113]. A similar increase in p-AKT (S473) was reported in the glioblastoma cell line U87MG [43].
The Gefi+AT7867 treatment induced further changes in these cells, including the suppression of p-AKT (which was induced by AT7867), the near-complete suppression of p-GSK3β and p-RPS6, and the suppression of p-STAT3 (Figure 4, left). Most of these changes, except for the recurrence of p-AKT, were sustained after 24 h of treatment (Figure 4, right). In addition, the levels of p-ERK1/2 were increased. The levels of p-RPS6, a major regulator of protein synthesis during cell cycle progression, were further reduced by 24 h of Gefi+AT7867 treatment; however, the reactivation of p-AKT and p-p90RSK, and the unregulated maintenance of p-ERK1/2, may contribute to the residual survival of TNBC cells under these conditions.

3.5. Upregulation of the MEK/ERK Pathway by Gefitinib and AT7867

Gefi+AT7867 enhanced the anti-proliferative and anti-clonogenic effects in MSL subtype TNBC cells; however, we hypothesized that additional signaling pathways may contribute to the residual survival of TNBC cells in the presence of Gefi+AT7867. For example, the levels of p-AKT were elevated in cells after a 2 h Gefi+AT7867 treatment, and were sustained to 24 h (Figure 4). In addition, p-p90RSK, a downstream target of the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway, was upregulated by AT7867 and Gefi+AT7867. No significant downregulation was observed in the levels of p-ERK1/2. Interestingly, the levels of p-ERK1/2 were slightly increased by Gefi+AT7867 in cells treated for 24 h (Figure 4, right).
To decipher the pathways that were upregulated in MSL type TNBC cells by Gefi+AT7867, we conducted an antibody microarray analysis. A proteomic expression analysis, comparing gefitinib alone and Gefi+AT7867, was further performed in the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways database. As a result, we identified that the MEK/ERK pathway was activated by Gefi+AT7867 when compared to gefitinib alone (Figure 5).

3.6. Synergistic Enhancement of the Anti-Proliferative Effect of Gefitinib and AT7867 via the Inhibition of the MEK Pathway

The antibody array analysis indicated activation of the MEK/ERK pathway by Gefi+AT7867; therefore, we performed a MTT screening with five MEK/ERK inhibitors (Table 1) in the presence of Gefi+AT7867 in MDA-MB-231 cells. These inhibitors included: (1) CI-1040 (PD184352), an ATP non-competitive MEK1/2 inhibitor (MEK1/2i) with an IC50 of 17 nM in cell-based assays [55]; (2) U0126, a selective MEK1/2i with an IC50 of 70 nM and 60 nM in biochemical assays [96]; (3) BIX 02189, a potent MEK5 inhibitor with an IC50 of 1.5 nM, which also inhibits ERK5 (IC50 = 59 nM) in biochemical assays and does not inhibit MEK1/2, ERK2, and c-Jun N-terminal kinase 2 (JNK2) [49]; (4) FR 180204, an ATP-competitive ERK inhibitor with an inhibitory constant (Ki) of 0.31 and 0.14 μM for ERK1 and ERK2, respectively, in cell-free assays [61]; and (5) PD-0325901 (Mirdametinib), a selective non-ATP-competitive MEK1/2i (IC50 = 0.33 nM in cell-free assays) [75].
As shown in Figure 6A, PD-0325901 was the most potent MEKi to induce strong synergism with Gefi+AT7867 in MDA-MB-231 cells. Furthermore, the triple combination of gefitinib and AT7867 and PD-0325901 reduced MDA-MB-231 and HS578T cell viability (Figure 6B).

3.7. Induction of Cell Death by Gefitinib and AT7867 and PD-0325901

Treatment with Gefi+AT7867 for 72 h induced G1 arrest, but not cell death, in MDA-MB-231 cells (Figure 2). Therefore, cell cycle distribution was analyzed in MDA-MB-231 cells treated with the triple drug combination for 24 h (Figure 7). Treatment with PD-0325901 alone increased and reduced the G1 and S phase, respectively, when compared with the DMSO control (Figure 7C). There was no significant increase in the G1 phase with gefitinib (Figure 7B) or AT7867 (Figure 7E) treatment alone; however, the effects of PD-0325901 were sustained in the presence of gefitinib (Figure 7D). By contrast, the effects of PD-0325901 were limited in the presence of AT7867 (Figure 7G). However, the addition of PD-0325901 in the presence of Gefi+AT7867 produced a marked increase in the sub-G1 population (34.94%; Figure 7H). This increase is the result of an increase in apoptotic cells containing fractional DNA content [114,115,116,117,118,119]. Taken together, PD-0325901 induced apoptosis in the presence of Gefi+AT7867 after 24 h, while no significant apoptosis was observed in the absence of PD-0325901 after 72 h treatment (Figure 2).

3.8. Blocking Long-Term Survival of TNBC Cells Using Gefitinib and AT7867 and PD-0326901

The inhibition of the MEK/ERK pathway by PD-0325901 in MSL TNBC cells was analyzed by long-term colony formation assay. As a single agent, 10 μM of gefitinib had little or no effect on MDA-MB-231 and HS578T colony formation (Figure 8). Treatment with 2.5 μM of AT7867 differentially reduced the number of colonies in MDA-MB-231 and HS578T cells. Interestingly, HS578T cells were relatively more resistant to AT7867 than MDA-MB-231 cells (Figure 8B). PD-0325901 (10 μM) alone markedly reduced the long-term survival of both MDA-MB-231 and HS578T cells; however, no significant synergism was observed following the gefitinib and PD-0325901 treatment. Contrarily, PD-0325901 further potentiated the effects of AT7867 in both cells. Moreover, the addition of PD-0325901 resulted in the near-complete inhibition of colony formation of both MSL type cells in the presence of gefitinib and AT7867 (Figure 8). These results suggest that this triple combination could further reduce the survival of residual cancer cells.

3.9. Regulation of Signaling Pathways in TNBC Cells by Gefitinib and AT7867 and PD-0326901

The effects of this triple combination on the signaling pathways were determined by Western blot analysis. MDA-MB-231 and HS578T cells were treated with drug combinations for 24 h, and the cell lysates were analyzed (Figure 9). As expected, the addition of PD-0325901 abolished the levels of p-ERK1/2 (lanes 3 and 4 in MDA-MB-231 and HS578T). The levels of p-RPS6 were further reduced by PD-0325901 in the presence of Gefi+AT7867. RPS6 was phosphorylated by S6K and RSK [109]; these results support that the inhibition of MEK by PD-0325901 reduces the residual phosphorylation of RPS6 via the MEK/ERK/RSK pathway. Importantly, PD-0325901 induced the cleavage of caspase-3. Inversely, the levels of the X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) were reduced by the gefitinib and AT7867 and PD-0326901 treatment. Previously, XIAP was reported as a causative protein in the acquired resistance of TNBC cells to the EGFR/HER2 inhibitor, GW583340 [120]. All these results are consistent with the cell cycle analysis results (Figure 7). Collectively, the addition of PD-0325901 induced the apoptotic cell death of MSL TNBC cells in the presence of Gefi+AT7867.

4. Discussion

High levels of EGFR expression in TNBC patients induces activation of the PI3K/AKT, MEK/ERK, and JAK/STAT3 pathways [17,121,122]. The MSL subtype of TNBC is associated with activated EGFR signaling [5] and exhibits greater intrinsic resistance to EGFRis than the BL TNBC cells [25,30]. Inhibition of EGFR alone does not suppress the proliferation of TNBC cells in preclinical cell line models; however, growing evidence supports EGFR as a potential therapeutic target for TNBC treatments, especially in combination with other targeted drugs [3,25,30,33,37,123,124,125,126,127]. Therefore, the identification of targets in combination with EGFRis provides an alternative strategy for developing an effective TNBC therapy because EGFR-targeting drugs have been approved [15,16]. Previously, our group reported that the inhibition of the PI3K/AKT [25], MET [30], or mTORC1 [33] pathways by small-molecule inhibitors induced the sensitization of TNBC cells to EGFRis.
Additional screening with small molecule PKIs in MDA-MB-231 cells identified AT7867 as a combination partner with gefitinib for MSL type TNBC cells. AT7867 is an ATP-competitive inhibitor of AKT1/2/3 (IC50 = 32, 17, 47 nM, respectively), p70S6K (IC50 = 85 nM), and PKA (IC50 = 20 nM) [43]. Interestingly, the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is activated in 10–21% of TNBCs [128]. Here, we showed that AT7867 potentiated the anti-proliferative effect of gefitinib and further reduced the colony formation of TNBC cells in the presence of gefitinib. However, Gefi+AT7867 did not induce apoptotic cell death in TNBC cells. Additionally, Gefi+AT7867 increased the activity of the MEK/ERK pathway. Therefore, we hypothesized that MEK/ERK activation may contribute to the survival of TNBC cells, even in the presence of Gefi+AT7867. In line with this, mutations of Kristen rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS), an upstream regulator of the MEK/ERK pathway, confer EGFRi resistance in lung adenocarcinoma [129].
Additional combination screening identified that PD-0325901 (Mirdametinib) induced apoptotic cell death in TNBC cells in the presence of Gefi+AT7867. The inhibition of Gefi+AT7867-induced p-ERK resulted in the induction of cleaved caspase-3 and reduction in the expression of XIAP. Functionally, gefitinib + AT7867 + PD-0325901 markedly diminished the number of surviving colonies. Taken together, attenuating the Gefi+AT7867-induced activation of the MEK/ERK pathway via MEKi overcame resistance to EGFRi (Figure 10). This reduced the survival of residual TNBC cells.
The expression of ERK1/2 is associated with that of EGFR in TNBC tissues [130], and high-level expression of ERK2 is correlated with shorter survival in TNBC patients [131,132]. The RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway is activated by amplification in TNBC, providing potential therapeutic targets [133,134]. Potential anti-proliferative effects of ERK inhibition in TNBC cells have been suggested [135,136,137]. Additionally, kinome analysis has revealed that MEK1/2 inhibition by selumentinib (AZD6244) causes acute loss of ERK activity, leading to the time-dependent reprogramming of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) including platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFRβ), discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinase 1/2 (DDR1/2), and AXL receptor tyrosine kinase (AXL), through ERK-dependent cellular myelocytomatosis (c-Myc) degradation in TNBC cell lines, SUM159 and MDA-MB-231 [138]. These RTK stimulations overcame MEK2 inhibition and reactivated the RAF/MEK2/ERK1/RSK1 pathway, which eventually circumvented MEK inhibition. Dual inhibition strategies have been evaluated for MEKi with other kinase inhibitors to treat TNBC in preclinical models, including EGFRi [32], PI3Ki, PDGFRi [139], and dasatinib [140]. However, phase 2 clinical trials with combination treatments involving the MEKi, trametinib (GSK120212), and the AKTi, uprosertib (GSK2141795), have shown limited efficacy in 50 patients with advanced TNBC [141].
In this report, we found that the triple combination of EGFRi + AKTi + MEKi is more effective at inducing apoptosis and eliminating residual colonies of MSL subtype TNBC cells in vitro. Previous studies suggested that blocking single- or double-signaling pathways was not sufficient to inhibit and induce TNBC cell proliferation and apoptosis, respectively [25,30,33]. This might be because multiple compensatory pathways support the survival of TNBC. In addition, drug-induced reprograming of survival pathways is required to circumvent drug resistance. Further explorations into multiplex drug combinations may provide new insights on treating intractable TNBC.

5. Conclusions

In this report, we found that the triple combination of EGFRi + AKTi + MEKi is more effective at inducing apoptosis and eliminating residual colonies of MSL subtype TNBC cells in vitro. Previous studies have suggested that blocking single- or double-signaling pathways is not sufficient to inhibit and induce TNBC cell proliferation and apoptosis, respectively [25,30,33]. This might be because multiple compensatory pathways support the survival of TNBC. In addition, drug-induced reprograming of survival pathways is required to circumvent drug resistance. Further explorations.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/6/1205/s1, Figure S1: uncropped blot images for Figure 4, Figure S2: uncropped blot images for Figure 9.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.W.Y. and Y.-S.S.; methodology, K.S.Y., Y.W.Y., J.C. and Y.-S.S.; investigation, K.S.Y., Y.W.Y., J.C. and Y.-S.S.; data curation, K.S.Y., Y.W.Y., J.C. and Y.-S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.W.Y. and Y.-S.S.; writing—review and editing, K.S.Y., Y.W.Y., J.C. and Y.-S.S.; visualization, Y.W.Y. and Y.-S.S.; supervision, Y.-S.S.; project administration, K.S.Y.; funding acquisition, J.C. and Y.-S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grants funded by the Korea Mistry of Science and ICT (MSIT): NRF-2015R1D1A1A01057893 (Y.-S.S.), NRF 2018R1D1A1B070489 (Y.-S.S.), and NRF-2019R1A4A1028268 (J.C. and Y.-S.S.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data in this study will be available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Diaz, L.K.; Cryns, V.L.; Symmans, W.F.; Sneige, N. Triple Negative Breast Carcinoma and the Basal Phenotype&colon; From Expression Profiling to Clinical Practice. Adv. Anat. Pathol. 2007, 14, 419–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Huynh, M.; Pambid, M.R.; Jayanthan, A.; Dorr, A.; Los, G.; Dunn, S.E. The Dawn of Targeted Therapies for Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC): A Snapshot of Investigational Drugs in Phase I and II Trials. Expert Opin. Investig. Drug 2020, 29, 1199–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nakai, K.; Hung, M.-C.; Yamaguchi, H. A Perspective on Anti-EGFR Therapies Targeting Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2016, 6, 1609–1623. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Brenton, J.D.; Carey, L.A.; Ahmed, A.A.; Caldas, C. Molecular Classification and Molecular Forecasting of Breast Cancer: Ready for Clinical Application? J. Clin. Oncol. 2005, 23, 7350–7360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Lehmann, B.D.; Bauer, J.A.; Chen, X.; Sanders, M.E.; Chakravarthy, A.B.; Shyr, Y.; Pietenpol, J.A. Identification of Human Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Subtypes and Preclinical Models for Selection of Targeted Therapies. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 2750–2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Lehmann, B.D.; Pietenpol, J.A. Identification and Use of Biomarkers in Treatment Strategies for Triple-negative Breast Cancer Subtypes. J. Pathol. 2014, 232, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liedtke, C.; Mazouni, C.; Hess, K.R.; André, F.; Tordai, A.; Mejia, J.A.; Symmans, W.F.; Gonzalez-Angulo, A.M.; Hennessy, B.; Green, M.; et al. Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy and Long-Term Survival in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008, 26, 1275–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kassam, F.; Enright, K.; Dent, R.; Dranitsaris, G.; Myers, J.; Flynn, C.; Fralick, M.; Kumar, R.; Clemons, M. Survival Outcomes for Patients with Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Implications for Clinical Practice and Trial Design. Clin. Breast Cancer 2009, 9, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Costa, R.; Shah, A.N.; Santa-Maria, C.A.; Cruz, M.R.; Mahalingam, D.; Carneiro, B.A.; Chae, Y.K.; Cristofanilli, M.; Gradishar, W.J.; Giles, F.J. Targeting Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: New Discoveries and Practical Insights for Drug Development. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2017, 53, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dent, R.; Trudeau, M.; Pritchard, K.I.; Hanna, W.M.; Kahn, H.K.; Sawka, C.A.; Lickley, L.A.; Rawlinson, E.; Sun, P.; Narod, S.A. Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Features and Patterns of Recurrence. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 4429–4434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Yi, Y.W.; Kang, H.J.; Kim, H.J.; Kong, Y.; Brown, M.M.; Bae, I. Targeting Mutant P53 by a SIRT1 Activator YK-3-237 Inhibits the Proliferation of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells. Oncotarget 2013, 4, 984–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Hou, S.; Yi, Y.W.; Kang, H.J.; Zhang, L.; Kim, H.J.; Kong, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, K.; Kong, H.-S.; Grindrod, S.; et al. Novel Carbazole Inhibits Phospho-STAT3 through Induction of Protein–Tyrosine Phosphatase PTPN6. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 6342–6353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Kang, H.J.; Yi, Y.W.; Hou, S.-J.; Kim, H.J.; Kong, Y.; Bae, I.; Brown, M.L. Disruption of STAT3-DNMT1 Interaction by SH-I-14 Induces Re-Expression of Tumor Suppressor Genes and Inhibits Growth of Triple-Negative Breast Tumor. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 83457–83468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Eccles, S.A. The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor/Erb-B/HER Family in Normal and Malignant Breast Biology. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2011, 55, 685–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yarden, Y.; Pines, G. The ERBB Network: At Last, Cancer Therapy Meets Systems Biology. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2012, 12, 553–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wheeler, D.L.; Dunn, E.F.; Harari, P.M. Understanding Resistance to EGFR Inhibitors—Impact on Future Treatment Strategies. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2010, 7, 493–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Wee, P.; Wang, Z. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Cell Proliferation Signaling Pathways. Cancers 2017, 9, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Zulkifli, A.A.; Tan, F.H.; Putoczki, T.L.; Stylli, S.S.; Luwor, R.B. STAT3 Signaling Mediates Tumour Resistance to EGFR Targeted Therapeutics. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2017, 451, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yarden, Y.; Sliwkowski, M.X. Untangling the ErbB Signalling Network. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2001, 2, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Arteaga, C.L.; Truica, C.I. Challenges in the Development of Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Therapies in Breast Cancer. Semin. Oncol. 2004, 31, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hong, Y.B.; Kim, J.S.; Yi, Y.W.; Seong, Y.-S.; Bae, I. Exploring Protein Kinase Inhibitors: Potentiating Gemcitabine Efficacy in Pancreatic Cancer. Pancreas 2012, 41, 496–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Kim, Y.J.; Hong, Y.B.; Cho, C.H.; Seong, Y.-S.; Bae, I. Exploring Protein Kinase Inhibitors: Unveiling Gemcitabine Resistance in Pancreatic Cancer. Pancreas 2012, 41, 804–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Duong, H.; Hong, Y.B.; Kim, J.S.; Lee, H.; Yi, Y.W.; Kim, Y.J.; Wang, A.; Zhao, W.; Cho, C.H.; Seong, Y.; et al. Inhibition of Checkpoint Kinase 2 (CHK2) Enhances Sensitivity of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Cells to Gemcitabine. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2013, 17, 1261–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yi, Y.W.; Kang, H.J.; Kim, H.J.; Hwang, J.S.; Wang, A.; Bae, I. Inhibition of Constitutively Activated Phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT Pathway Enhances Antitumor Activity of Chemotherapeutic Agents in Breast Cancer Susceptibility Gene 1-defective Breast Cancer Cells. Mol. Carcinog. 2013, 52, 667–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Yi, Y.W.; Hong, W.; Kang, H.J.; Kim, H.J.; Zhao, W.; Wang, A.; Seong, Y.; Bae, I. Inhibition of the PI3K/AKT Pathway Potentiates Cytotoxicity of EGFR Kinase Inhibitors in Triple-negative Breast Cancer Cells. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2013, 17, 648–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Duong, H.-Q.; Yi, Y.W.; Kang, H.J.; Bae, I.; Jang, Y.-J.; Kwak, S.-J.; Seong, Y.-S. Combination of Dasatinib and Gemcitabine Reduces the ALDH1A1 Expression and the Proliferation of Gemcitabine-Resistant Pancreatic Cancer MIA PaCa-2 Cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2014, 44, 2132–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Duong, H.-Q.; Yi, Y.W.; Kang, H.J.; Hong, Y.B.; Tang, W.; Wang, A.; Seong, Y.-S.; Bae, I. Inhibition of NRF2 by PIK-75 Augments Sensitivity of Pancreatic Cancer Cells to Gemcitabine. Int. J. Oncol. 2013, 44, 959–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Cao, J.; Heijkants, R.C.; Jochemsen, A.G.; Dogrusöz, M.; de Lange, M.J.; van der Velden, P.A.; van der Burg, S.H.; Jager, M.J.; Verdijk, R.M. Targeting of the MAPK and AKT Pathways in Conjunctival Melanoma Shows Potential Synergy. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 58021–58036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yi, Y.W.; Park, J.-S.; Kwak, S.-J.; Seong, Y.-S. Co-Treatment with BEZ235 Enhances Sensitivity of BRCA1-Negative Breast Cancer Cells to Olaparib. Anticancer Res. 2015, 35, 3829–3838. [Google Scholar]
  30. Yi, Y.W.; You, K.; Bae, E.J.; Kwak, S.-J.; Seong, Y.-S.; Bae, I. Dual Inhibition of EGFR and MET Induces Synthetic Lethality in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells through Downregulation of Ribosomal Protein S6. Int. J. Oncol. 2015, 47, 122–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Ayub, A.; Yip, W.K.; Seow, H.F. Dual Treatments Targeting IGF-1R, PI3K, MTORC or MEK Synergize to Inhibit Cell Growth, Induce Apoptosis, and Arrest Cell Cycle at G1 Phase in MDA-MB-231 Cell Line. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2015, 75, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Maiello, M.R.; D’Alessio, A.; Bevilacqua, S.; Gallo, M.; Normanno, N.; Luca, A.D. EGFR and MEK Blockade in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cells. J. Cell Biochem. 2015, 116, 2778–2785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. You, K.S.; Yi, Y.W.; Kwak, S.-J.; Seong, Y.-S. Inhibition of RPTOR Overcomes Resistance to EGFR Inhibition in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2018, 52, 828–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. He, J.; McLaughlin, R.P.; van der Noord, V.; Foekens, J.A.; Martens, J.W.M.; van Westen, G.; Zhang, Y.; van de Water, B. Multi-Targeted Kinase Inhibition Alleviates MTOR Inhibitor Resistance in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2019, 178, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Bajor, M.; Graczyk-Jarzynka, A.; Marhelava, K.; Kurkowiak, M.; Rahman, A.; Aura, C.; Russell, N.; Zych, A.O.; Firczuk, M.; Winiarska, M.; et al. Triple Combination of Ascorbate, Menadione and the Inhibition of Peroxiredoxin-1 Produces Synergistic Cytotoxic Effects in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pattarawat, P.; Wallace, S.; Pfisterer, B.; Odoi, A.; Wang, H.-C.R. Formulation of a Triple Combination Gemcitabine plus Romidepsin + Cisplatin Regimen to Efficaciously and Safely Control Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Tumor Development. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2020, 85, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ahmad, S.; He, Q.; Williams, K.P.; Scott, J.E. Identification of a Triple Drug Combination That Is Synergistically Cytotoxic for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells Using a Novel Combination Discovery Approach. SLAS Discov. 2020, 25, 923–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kim, D.-J.; Yi, Y.-W.; Kim, J.H. In Situ Monitoring of Bindings between Dasatinib and Its Target Protein Kinases Using Magnetic Nanoparticles in Live Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16466–16467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Minkovsky, N.; Berezov, A. BIBW-2992, a Dual Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor for the Treatment of Solid Tumors. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs Lond. Engl. 2000 2008, 9, 1336–1346. [Google Scholar]
  40. Yamaguchi, T.; Kakefuda, R.; Tajima, N.; Sowa, Y.; Sakai, T. Antitumor Activities of JTP-74057 (GSK1120212), a Novel MEK1/2 Inhibitor, on Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines in Vitro and in Vivo. Int. J. Oncol. 2011, 39, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kim, S.I.; Kim, H.J.; Lee, H.-J.; Lee, K.; Hong, D.; Lim, H.; Cho, K.; Jung, N.; Yi, Y.W. Application of a Non-Hazardous Vital Dye for Cell Counting with Automated Cell Counters. Anal. Biochem. 2016, 492, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Cool, B.; Zinker, B.; Chiou, W.; Kifle, L.; Cao, N.; Perham, M.; Dickinson, R.; Adler, A.; Gagne, G.; Iyengar, R.; et al. Identification and Characterization of a Small Molecule AMPK Activator That Treats Key Components of Type 2 Diabetes and the Metabolic Syndrome. Cell Metab. 2006, 3, 403–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Grimshaw, K.M.; Hunter, L.-J.K.; Yap, T.A.; Heaton, S.P.; Walton, M.I.; Woodhead, S.J.; Fazal, L.; Reule, M.; Davies, T.G.; Seavers, L.C.; et al. AT7867 Is a Potent and Oral Inhibitor of AKT and P70 S6 Kinase That Induces Pharmacodynamic Changes and Inhibits Human Tumor Xenograft Growth. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2010, 9, 1100–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Howard, S.; Berdini, V.; Boulstridge, J.A.; Carr, M.G.; Cross, D.M.; Curry, J.; Devine, L.A.; Early, T.R.; Fazal, L.; Gill, A.L.; et al. Fragment-Based Discovery of the Pyrazol-4-Yl Urea (AT9283), a Multitargeted Kinase Inhibitor with Potent Aurora Kinase Activity. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Yang, J.; Ikezoe, T.; Nishioka, C.; Tasaka, T.; Taniguchi, A.; Kuwayama, Y.; Komatsu, N.; Bandobashi, K.; Togitani, K.; Koeffler, H.P.; et al. AZD1152, a Novel and Selective Aurora B Kinase Inhibitor, Induces Growth Arrest, Apoptosis, and Sensitization for Tubulin Depolymerizing Agent or Topoisomerase II Inhibitor in Human Acute Leukemia Cells in Vitro and in Vivo. Blood 2007, 110, 2034–2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Derenzini, E.; Lemoine, M.; Buglio, D.; Katayama, H.; Ji, Y.; Davis, R.E.; Sen, S.; Younes, A. The JAK Inhibitor AZD1480 Regulates Proliferation and Immunity in Hodgkin Lymphoma. Blood Cancer J. 2011, 1, e46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Steegmaier, M.; Hoffmann, M.; Baum, A.; Lénárt, P.; Petronczki, M.; Krššák, M.; Gürtler, U.; Garin-Chesa, P.; Lieb, S.; Quant, J.; et al. BI 2536, a Potent and Selective Inhibitor of Polo-like Kinase 1, Inhibits Tumor Growth In Vivo. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17, 316–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Chen, L.; Yap, J.L.; Yoshioka, M.; Lanning, M.E.; Fountain, R.N.; Raje, M.; Scheenstra, J.A.; Strovel, J.W.; Fletcher, S. BRD4 Structure–Activity Relationships of Dual PLK1 Kinase/BRD4 Bromodomain Inhibitor BI-2536. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 764–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Tatake, R.J.; O’Neill, M.M.; Kennedy, C.A.; Wayne, A.L.; Jakes, S.; Wu, D.; Kugler, S.Z.; Kashem, M.A.; Kaplita, P.; Snow, R.J. Identification of Pharmacological Inhibitors of the MEK5/ERK5 Pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 377, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Zhou, G.; Myers, R.; Li, Y.; Chen, Y.; Shen, X.; Fenyk-Melody, J.; Wu, M.; Ventre, J.; Doebber, T.; Fujii, N.; et al. Role of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase in Mechanism of Metformin Action. J. Clin. Investig. 2001, 108, 1167–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Boschelli, D.H.; Ye, F.; Wang, Y.D.; Dutia, M.; Johnson, S.L.; Wu, B.; Miller, K.; Powell, D.W.; Yaczko, D.; Young, M.; et al. Optimization of 4-Phenylamino-3-Quinolinecarbonitriles as Potent Inhibitors of Src Kinase Activity. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 3965–3977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Golas, J.M.; Arndt, K.; Etienne, C.; Lucas, J.; Nardin, D.; Gibbons, J.; Frost, P.; Ye, F.; Boschelli, D.H.; Boschelli, F. SKI-606, a 4-Anilino-3-Quinolinecarbonitrile Dual Inhibitor of Src and Abl Kinases, Is a Potent Antiproliferative Agent against Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Cells in Culture and Causes Regression of K562 Xenografts in Nude Mice. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 375–381. [Google Scholar]
  53. Chan, S.-L.; Lee, M.C.; Tan, K.O.; Yang, L.-K.; Lee, A.S.Y.; Flotow, H.; Fu, N.Y.; Butler, M.S.; Soejarto, D.D.; Buss, A.D.; et al. Identification of Chelerythrine as an Inhibitor of BclXL Function. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 20453–20456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Ring, D.B.; Johnson, K.W.; Henriksen, E.J.; Nuss, J.M.; Goff, D.; Kinnick, T.R.; Ma, S.T.; Reeder, J.W.; Samuels, I.; Slabiak, T.; et al. Selective Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 Inhibitors Potentiate Insulin Activation of Glucose Transport and Utilization In Vitro and In Vivo. Diabetes 2003, 52, 588–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Sebolt-Leopold, J.S.; Dudley, D.T.; Herrera, R.; Becelaere, K.V.; Wiland, A.; Gowan, R.C.; Tecle, H.; Barrett, S.D.; Bridges, A.; Przybranowski, S.; et al. Blockade of the MAP Kinase Pathway Suppresses Growth of Colon Tumors in Vivo. Nat. Med. 1999, 5, 810–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Changelian, P.S.; Flanagan, M.E.; Ball, D.J.; Kent, C.R.; Magnuson, K.S.; Martin, W.H.; Rizzuti, B.J.; Sawyer, P.S.; Perry, B.D.; Brissette, W.H.; et al. Prevention of Organ Allograft Rejection by a Specific Janus Kinase 3 Inhibitor. Science 2003, 302, 875–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Wang, S.; Midgley, C.A.; Scaërou, F.; Grabarek, J.B.; Griffiths, G.; Jackson, W.; Kontopidis, G.; McClue, S.J.; McInnes, C.; Meades, C.; et al. Discovery of N-Phenyl-4-(Thiazol-5-Yl)Pyrimidin-2-Amine Aurora Kinase Inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 4367–4378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Carpinelli, P.; Ceruti, R.; Giorgini, M.L.; Cappella, P.; Gianellini, L.; Croci, V.; Degrassi, A.; Texido, G.; Rocchetti, M.; Vianello, P.; et al. PHA-739358, a Potent Inhibitor of Aurora Kinases with a Selective Target Inhibition Profile Relevant to Cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2007, 6, 3158–3168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Graff, J.R.; McNulty, A.M.; Hanna, K.R.; Konicek, B.W.; Lynch, R.L.; Bailey, S.N.; Banks, C.; Capen, A.; Goode, R.; Lewis, J.E.; et al. The Protein Kinase Cβ–Selective Inhibitor, Enzastaurin (LY317615.HCl), Suppresses Signaling through the AKT Pathway, Induces Apoptosis, and Suppresses Growth of Human Colon Cancer and Glioblastoma Xenografts. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 7462–7469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Ono-Saito, N.; Niki, I.; Hidaka, H. H-Series Protein Kinase Inhibitors and Potential Clinical Applications. Pharmacol. Ther. 1999, 82, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ohori, M.; Kinoshita, T.; Okubo, M.; Sato, K.; Yamazaki, A.; Arakawa, H.; Nishimura, S.; Inamura, N.; Nakajima, H.; Neya, M.; et al. Identification of a Selective ERK Inhibitor and Structural Determination of the Inhibitor–ERK2 Complex. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 336, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wong, H.; Belvin, M.; Herter, S.; Hoeflich, K.P.; Murray, L.J.; Wong, L.; Choo, E.F. Pharmacodynamics of 2-{4-[(1E)-1-(Hydroxyimino)-2,3-Dihydro-1H-Inden-5-Yl]-3-(Pyridine-4-Yl)-1H-Pyrazol-1-Yl}ethan-1-Ol (GDC-0879), a Potent and Selective B-Raf Kinase Inhibitor: Understanding Relationships between Systemic Concentrations, Phosphorylated Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinase 1 Inhibition, and Efficacy. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2009, 329, 360–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lansing, T.J.; McConnell, R.T.; Duckett, D.R.; Spehar, G.M.; Knick, V.B.; Hassler, D.F.; Noro, N.; Furuta, M.; Emmitte, K.A.; Gilmer, T.M.; et al. In Vitro Biological Activity of a Novel Small-Molecule Inhibitor of Polo-like Kinase 1. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2007, 6, 450–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Leclerc, S.; Garnier, M.; Hoessel, R.; Marko, D.; Bibb, J.A.; Snyder, G.L.; Greengard, P.; Biernat, J.; Wu, Y.-Z.; Mandelkow, E.-M.; et al. Indirubins Inhibit Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3β and CDK5/P25, Two Protein Kinases Involved in Abnormal Tau Phosphorylation in Alzheimer’s Disease a Property Common to Most Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitors? J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Waelchli, R.; Bollbuck, B.; Bruns, C.; Buhl, T.; Eder, J.; Feifel, R.; Hersperger, R.; Janser, P.; Revesz, L.; Zerwes, H.-G.; et al. Design and Preparation of 2-Benzamido-Pyrimidines as Inhibitors of IKK. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Heinrich, M.C.; Griffith, D.J.; Druker, B.J.; Wait, C.L.; Ott, K.A.; Zigler, A.J. Inhibition of C-Kit Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Activity by STI 571, a Selective Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor. Blood 2000, 96, 925–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Quintás-Cardama, A.; Vaddi, K.; Liu, P.; Manshouri, T.; Li, J.; Scherle, P.A.; Caulder, E.; Wen, X.; Li, Y.; Waeltz, P.; et al. Preclinical Characterization of the Selective JAK1/2 Inhibitor INCB018424: Therapeutic Implications for the Treatment of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. Blood 2010, 115, 3109–3117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Emanuel, S.; Rugg, C.A.; Gruninger, R.H.; Lin, R.; Fuentes-Pesquera, A.; Connolly, P.J.; Wetter, S.K.; Hollister, B.; Kruger, W.W.; Napier, C.; et al. The In Vitro and In Vivo Effects of JNJ-7706621: A Dual Inhibitor of Cyclin-Dependent Kinases and Aurora Kinases. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 9038–9046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Hickson, I.; Zhao, Y.; Richardson, C.J.; Green, S.J.; Martin, N.M.B.; Orr, A.I.; Reaper, P.M.; Jackson, S.P.; Curtin, N.J.; Smith, G.C.M. Identification and Characterization of a Novel and Specific Inhibitor of the Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated Kinase ATM. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 9152–9159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Mader, M.; de Dios, A.; Shih, C.; Bonjouklian, R.; Li, T.; White, W.; de Uralde, B.L.; Sánchez-Martinez, C.; del Prado, M.; Jaramillo, C.; et al. Imidazolyl Benzimidazoles and Imidazo[4,5-b]Pyridines as Potent P38α MAP Kinase Inhibitors with Excellent in Vivo Antiinflammatory Properties. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 179–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Manfredi, M.G.; Ecsedy, J.A.; Chakravarty, A.; Silverman, L.; Zhang, M.; Hoar, K.M.; Stroud, S.G.; Chen, W.; Shinde, V.; Huck, J.J.; et al. Characterization of Alisertib (MLN8237), an Investigational Small-Molecule Inhibitor of Aurora A Kinase Using Novel In Vivo Pharmacodynamic Assays. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 7614–7624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Weisberg, E.; Catley, L.; Wright, R.D.; Moreno, D.; Banerji, L.; Ray, A.; Manley, P.W.; Mestan, J.; Fabbro, D.; Jiang, J.; et al. Beneficial Effects of Combining Nilotinib and Imatinib in Preclinical Models of BCR-ABL+ Leukemias. Blood 2007, 109, 2112–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Jobson, A.G.; Cardellina, J.H.; Scudiero, D.; Kondapaka, S.; Zhang, H.; Kim, H.; Shoemaker, R.; Pommier, Y. Identification of a Bis-Guanylhydrazone [4,4′-Diacetyldiphenylurea-Bis(Guanylhydrazone); NSC 109555] as a Novel Chemotype for Inhibition of Chk2 Kinase. Mol. Pharmacol. 2007, 72, 876–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Leahy, J.J.J.; Golding, B.T.; Griffin, R.J.; Hardcastle, I.R.; Richardson, C.; Rigoreau, L.; Smith, G.C.M. Identification of a Highly Potent and Selective DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase (DNA-PK) Inhibitor (NU7441) by Screening of Chromenone Libraries. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 6083–6087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Barrett, S.D.; Bridges, A.J.; Dudley, D.T.; Saltiel, A.R.; Fergus, J.H.; Flamme, C.M.; Delaney, A.M.; Kaufman, M.; LePage, S.; Leopold, W.R.; et al. The Discovery of the Benzhydroxamate MEK Inhibitors CI-1040 and PD 0325901. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 6501–6504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Palmer, B.D.; Thompson, A.M.; Booth, R.J.; Dobrusin, E.M.; Kraker, A.J.; Lee, H.H.; Lunney, E.A.; Mitchell, L.H.; Ortwine, D.F.; Smaill, J.B.; et al. 4-Phenylpyrrolo[3,4-c]Carbazole-1,3(2H,6H)-Dione Inhibitors of the Checkpoint Kinase Wee1. Structure−Activity Relationships for Chromophore Modification and Phenyl Ring Substitution. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 4896–4911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Pearce, L.R.; Alton, G.R.; Richter, D.T.; Kath, J.C.; Lingardo, L.; Chapman, J.; Hwang, C.; Alessi, D.R. Characterization of PF-4708671, a Novel and Highly Specific Inhibitor of P70 Ribosomal S6 Kinase (S6K1). Biochem. J. 2010, 431, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Slack-Davis, J.K.; Martin, K.H.; Tilghman, R.W.; Iwanicki, M.; Ung, E.J.; Autry, C.; Luzzio, M.J.; Cooper, B.; Kath, J.C.; Roberts, W.G.; et al. Cellular Characterization of a Novel Focal Adhesion Kinase Inhibitor. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 14845–14852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Fabbro, D.; Buchdunger, E.; Wood, J.; Mestan, J.; Hofmann, F.; Ferrari, S.; Mett, H.; O’Reilly, T.; Meyer, T. Inhibitors of Protein Kinases CGP 41251, a Protein Kinase Inhibitor with Potential as an Anticancer Agent. Pharmacol. Ther. 1999, 82, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bollag, G.; Hirth, P.; Tsai, J.; Zhang, J.; Ibrahim, P.N.; Cho, H.; Spevak, W.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Habets, G.; et al. Clinical Efficacy of a RAF Inhibitor Needs Broad Target Blockade in BRAF-Mutant Melanoma. Nature 2010, 467, 596–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Tsai, J.; Lee, J.T.; Wang, W.; Zhang, J.; Cho, H.; Mamo, S.; Bremer, R.; Gillette, S.; Kong, J.; Haass, N.K.; et al. Discovery of a Selective Inhibitor of Oncogenic B-Raf Kinase with Potent Antimelanoma Activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 3041–3046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Wilkinson, S.E.; Parker, P.J.; Nixon, J.S. Isoenzyme Specificity of Bisindolylmaleimides, Selective Inhibitors of Protein Kinase C. Biochem. J. 1993, 294, 335–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Meijer, L.; Borgne, A.; Mulner, O.; Chong, J.P.J.; Blow, J.J.; Inagaki, N.; Inagaki, M.; Delcros, J.; Moulinoux, J. Biochemical and Cellular Effects of Roscovitine, a Potent and Selective Inhibitor of the Cyclin-Dependent Kinases Cdc2, Cdk2 and Cdk5. Eur. J. Biochem. 1997, 243, 527–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Coghlan, M.P.; Culbert, A.A.; Cross, D.A.; Corcoran, S.L.; Yates, J.W.; Pearce, N.J.; Rausch, O.L.; Murphy, G.J.; Carter, P.S.; Cox, L.R.; et al. Selective Small Molecule Inhibitors of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 Modulate Glycogen Metabolism and Gene Transcription. Chem. Biol. 2000, 7, 793–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Jackson, J.R.; Gilmartin, A.; Imburgia, C.; Winkler, J.D.; Marshall, L.A.; Roshak, A. An Indolocarbazole Inhibitor of Human Checkpoint Kinase (Chk1) Abrogates Cell Cycle Arrest Caused by DNA Damage. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 566–572. [Google Scholar]
  86. Conroy, A.; Stockett, D.E.; Walker, D.; Arkin, M.R.; Hoch, U.; Fox, J.A.; Hawtin, R.E. SNS-032 Is a Potent and Selective CDK 2, 7 and 9 Inhibitor That Drives Target Modulation in Patient Samples. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2009, 64, 723–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Oslob, J.D.; Romanowski, M.J.; Allen, D.A.; Baskaran, S.; Bui, M.; Elling, R.A.; Flanagan, W.M.; Fung, A.D.; Hanan, E.J.; Harris, S.; et al. Discovery of a Potent and Selective Aurora Kinase Inhibitor. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 4880–4884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bennett, B.L.; Sasaki, D.T.; Murray, B.W.; O’Leary, E.C.; Sakata, S.T.; Xu, W.; Leisten, J.C.; Motiwala, A.; Pierce, S.; Satoh, Y.; et al. SP600125, an Anthrapyrazolone Inhibitor of Jun N-Terminal Kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 13681–13686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Pagano, M.A.; Poletto, G.; Maira, G.D.; Cozza, G.; Ruzzene, M.; Sarno, S.; Bain, J.; Elliott, M.; Moro, S.; Zagotto, G.; et al. Tetrabromocinnamic Acid (TBCA) and Related Compounds Represent a New Class of Specific Protein Kinase CK2 Inhibitors. ChemBioChem 2007, 8, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Teng, M.; Zhu, J.; Johnson, M.D.; Chen, P.; Kornmann, J.; Chen, E.; Blasina, A.; Register, J.; Anderes, K.; Rogers, C.; et al. Structure-Based Design of (5-Arylamino-2 H -Pyrazol-3-Yl)-Biphenyl-2‘,4‘-Diols as Novel and Potent Human CHK1 Inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 5253–5256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Cheney, I.W.; Yan, S.; Appleby, T.; Walker, H.; Vo, T.; Yao, N.; Hamatake, R.; Hong, Z.; Wu, J.Z. Identification and Structure–Activity Relationships of Substituted Pyridones as Inhibitors of Pim-1 Kinase. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 1679–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Beharry, Z.; Zemskova, M.; Mahajan, S.; Zhang, F.; Ma, J.; Xia, Z.; Lilly, M.; Smith, C.D.; Kraft, A.S. Novel Benzylidene-Thiazolidine-2,4-Diones Inhibit Pim Protein Kinase Activity and Induce Cell Cycle Arrest in Leukemia and Prostate Cancer Cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2009, 8, 1473–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Harrington, E.A.; Bebbington, D.; Moore, J.; Rasmussen, R.K.; Ajose-Adeogun, A.O.; Nakayama, T.; Graham, J.A.; Demur, C.; Hercend, T.; Diu-Hercend, A.; et al. VX-680, a Potent and Selective Small-Molecule Inhibitor of the Aurora Kinases, Suppresses Tumor Growth in Vivo. Nat. Med. 2004, 10, 262–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Cheetham, G.M.T.; Charlton, P.A.; Golec, J.M.C.; Pollard, J.R. Structural Basis for Potent Inhibition of the Aurora Kinases and a T315I Multi-Drug Resistant Mutant Form of Abl Kinase by VX-680. Cancer Lett. 2007, 251, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Podolin, P.L.; Callahan, J.F.; Bolognese, B.J.; Li, Y.H.; Carlson, K.; Davis, T.G.; Mellor, G.W.; Evans, C.; Roshak, A.K. Attenuation of Murine Collagen-Induced Arthritis by a Novel, Potent, Selective Small Molecule Inhibitor of IκB Kinase 2, TPCA-1 (2-[(Aminocarbonyl)Amino]-5-(4-Fluorophenyl)-3-Thiophenecarboxamide), Occurs via Reduction of Proinflammatory Cytokines and Antigen-Induced T Cell Proliferation. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2005, 312, 373–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Duncia, J.V.; Santella, J.B.; Higley, C.A.; Pitts, W.J.; Wityak, J.; Frietze, W.E.; Rankin, F.W.; Sun, J.-H.; Earl, R.A.; Tabaka, A.C.; et al. MEK Inhibitors: The Chemistry and Biological Activity of U0126, Its Analogs, and Cyclization Products. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1998, 8, 2839–2844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Kuliopulos, A.; Mohanlal, R.; Covic, L. Effect of Selective Inhibition of the P38 MAP Kinase Pathway on Platelet Aggregation. Thromb. Haemost. 2004, 92, 1387–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Uehata, M.; Ishizaki, T.; Satoh, H.; Ono, T.; Kawahara, T.; Morishita, T.; Tamakawa, H.; Yamagami, K.; Inui, J.; Maekawa, M.; et al. Calcium Sensitization of Smooth Muscle Mediated by a Rho-Associated Protein Kinase in Hypertension. Nature 1997, 389, 990–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ishizaki, T.; Uehata, M.; Tamechika, I.; Keel, J.; Nonomura, K.; Maekawa, M.; Narumiya, S. Pharmacological Properties of Y-27632, a Specific Inhibitor of Rho-Associated Kinases. Mol. Pharmacol. 2000, 57, 976–983. [Google Scholar]
  100. Ditchfield, C.; Johnson, V.L.; Tighe, A.; Ellston, R.; Haworth, C.; Johnson, T.; Mortlock, A.; Keen, N.; Taylor, S.S. Aurora B Couples Chromosome Alignment with Anaphase by Targeting BubR1, Mad2, and Cenp-E to Kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 161, 267–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Duong, H.-Q.; You, K.; Oh, S.; Kwak, S.-J.; Seong, Y.-S. Silencing of NRF2 Reduces the Expression of ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1 and Sensitizes to 5-FU in Pancreatic Cancer Cells. Antioxidants 2017, 6, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Jin, Q.; Esteva, F.J. Cross-Talk Between the ErbB/HER Family and the Type I Insulin-Like Growth Factor Receptor Signaling Pathway in Breast Cancer. J. Mammary Gland Biol. 2008, 13, 485–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Karamouzis, M.V.; Konstantinopoulos, P.A.; Papavassiliou, A.G. Targeting MET as a Strategy to Overcome Crosstalk-Related Resistance to EGFR Inhibitors. Lancet Oncol. 2009, 10, 709–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Liu, P.; Cheng, H.; Roberts, T.M.; Zhao, J.J. Targeting the Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Pathway in Cancer. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2009, 8, 627–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Nahta, R.; Yu, D.; Hung, M.-C.; Hortobagyi, G.N.; Esteva, F.J. Mechanisms of Disease: Understanding Resistance to HER2-Targeted Therapy in Human Breast Cancer. Nat. Clin. Pract. Oncol. 2006, 3, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Yamaguchi, H.; Chang, S.-S.; Hsu, J.L.; Hung, M.-C. Signaling Cross-Talk in the Resistance to HER Family Receptor Targeted Therapy. Oncogene 2014, 33, 1073–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Baselga, J. Targeting Tyrosine Kinases in Cancer: The Second Wave. Science 2006, 312, 1175–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Heil, J.; Reifferscheid, G.; Waldmann, P.; Leyhausen, G.; Geurtsen, W. Genotoxicity of Dental Materials. Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. 1996, 368, 181–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Meyuhas, O. Ribosomal Protein S6 Phosphorylation Four Decades of Research. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2015, 320, 41–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Chandarlapaty, S.; Sawai, A.; Scaltriti, M.; Rodrik-Outmezguine, V.; Grbovic-Huezo, O.; Serra, V.; Majumder, P.K.; Baselga, J.; Rosen, N. AKT Inhibition Relieves Feedback Suppression of Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Expression and Activity. Cancer Cell 2011, 19, 58–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Serra, V.; Scaltriti, M.; Prudkin, L.; Eichhorn, P.J.A.; Ibrahim, Y.H.; Chandarlapaty, S.; Markman, B.; Rodriguez, O.; Guzman, M.; Rodriguez, S.; et al. PI3K Inhibition Results in Enhanced HER Signaling and Acquired ERK Dependency in HER2-Overexpressing Breast Cancer. Oncogene 2011, 30, 2547–2557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Chakrabarty, A.; Sánchez, V.; Kuba, M.G.; Rinehart, C.; Arteaga, C.L. Feedback Upregulation of HER3 (ErbB3) Expression and Activity Attenuates Antitumor Effect of PI3K Inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 2718–2723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Garrett, J.T.; Olivares, M.G.; Rinehart, C.; Granja-Ingram, N.D.; Sánchez, V.; Chakrabarty, A.; Dave, B.; Cook, R.S.; Pao, W.; McKinely, E.; et al. Transcriptional and Posttranslational Up-Regulation of HER3 (ErbB3) Compensates for Inhibition of the HER2 Tyrosine Kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 5021–5026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Kajstura, M.; Halicka, H.D.; Pryjma, J.; Darzynkiewicz, Z. Discontinuous Fragmentation of Nuclear DNA during Apoptosis Revealed by Discrete “Sub-G1” Peaks on DNA Content Histograms. Cytom. Part A 2007, 71A, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Umansky, S.R.; Korol’, B.A.; Nelipovich, P.A. In Vivo DNA Degradation in Thymocytes of γ-Irradiated or Hydrocortisone-Treated Rats. BBA Nucleic Acids Protein Synth. 1981, 655, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Telford, W.G.; King, L.E.; Fraker, P.J. Evaluation of Glucocorticoid-induced DNA Fragmentation in Mouse Thymocytes by Flow Cytometry. Cell Prolif. 1991, 24, 447–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Telford, W.G.; King, L.E.; Fraker, P.J. Comparative Evaluation of Several DNA Binding Dyes in the Detection of Apoptosis-associated Chromatin Degradation by Flow Cytometry. Cytometry 1992, 13, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Gong, J.P.; Traganos, F.; Darzynkiewicz, Z. A Selective Procedure for DNA Extraction from Apoptotic Cells Applicable for Gel Electrophoresis and Flow Cytometry. Anal. Biochem. 1994, 218, 314–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Darzynkiewicz, Z.; Juan, G.; Li, X.; Gorczyca, W.; Murakami, T.; Traganos, F. Cytometry in Cell Necrobiology: Analysis of Apoptosis and Accidental Cell Death (Necrosis). Cytometry 1997, 27, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Aird, K.M.; Ghanayem, R.B.; Peplinski, S.; Lyerly, H.K.; Devi, G.R. X-Linked Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein Inhibits Apoptosis in Inflammatory Breast Cancer Cells with Acquired Resistance to an ErbB1/2 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2010, 9, 1432–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Kim, S.; You, D.; Jeong, Y.; Yu, J.; Kim, S.W.; Nam, S.J.; Lee, J.E. Berberine Down-Regulates IL-8 Expression through Inhibition of the EGFR/MEK/ERK Pathway in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells. Phytomedicine 2018, 50, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Song, X.; Liu, Z.; Yu, Z. EGFR Promotes the Development of Triple Negative Breast Cancer through JAK/STAT3 Signaling. Cancer Manag. Res. 2020, 12, 703–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Sohn, J.; Liu, S.; Parinyanitikul, N.; Lee, J.; Hortobagyi, G.N.; Mills, G.B.; Ueno, N.T.; Gonzalez-Angulo, A.M. CMET Activation and EGFR-Directed Therapy Resistance in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. J. Cancer 2014, 5, 745–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Simiczyjew, A.; Dratkiewicz, E.; Troys, M.V.; Ampe, C.; Styczeń, I.; Nowak, D. Combination of EGFR Inhibitor Lapatinib and MET Inhibitor Foretinib Inhibits Migration of Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cell Lines. Cancers 2018, 10, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Li, W.; Hou, J.-Z.; Niu, J.; Xi, Z.-Q.; Ma, C.; Sun, H.; Wang, C.-J.; Fang, D.; Li, Q.; Xie, S.-Q. Akt1 Inhibition Promotes Breast Cancer Metastasis through EGFR-Mediated β-Catenin Nuclear Accumulation. Cell Commun. Signal. 2018, 16, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Fleisher, B.; Mody, H.; Werkman, C.; Ait-Oudhia, S. Chloroquine Sensitizes MDA-MB-231 Cells to Osimertinib through Autophagy–Apoptosis Crosstalk Pathway. Breast Cancer Targets Ther. 2019, 11, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Guerrab, A.E.; Bamdad, M.; Bignon, Y.-J.; Penault-Llorca, F.; Aubel, C. Co-Targeting EGFR and MTOR with Gefitinib and Everolimus in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 6367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Cossu-Rocca, P.; Orrù, S.; Muroni, M.R.; Sanges, F.; Sotgiu, G.; Ena, S.; Pira, G.; Murgia, L.; Manca, A.; Uras, M.G.; et al. Analysis of PIK3CA Mutations and Activation Pathways in Triple Negative Breast Cancer. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Pao, W.; Wang, T.Y.; Riely, G.J.; Miller, V.A.; Pan, Q.; Ladanyi, M.; Zakowski, M.F.; Heelan, R.T.; Kris, M.G.; Varmus, H.E. KRAS Mutations and Primary Resistance of Lung Adenocarcinomas to Gefitinib or Erlotinib. PLoS Med. 2005, 2, e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Jiang, W.; Wang, X.; Zhang, C.; Xue, L.; Yang, L. Expression and Clinical Significance of MAPK and EGFR in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2020, 19, 1842–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Bartholomeusz, C.; Gonzalez-Angulo, A.M.; Liu, P.; Hayashi, N.; Lluch, A.; Ferrer-Lozano, J.; Hortobágyi, G.N. High ERK Protein Expression Levels Correlate with Shorter Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients. Oncologist 2012, 17, 766–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Gholami, S.; Chen, C.-H.; Gao, S.; Lou, E.; Fujisawa, S.; Carson, J.; Nnoli, J.E.; Chou, T.-C.; Bromberg, J.; Fong, Y. Role of MAPK in Oncolytic Herpes Viral Therapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancer Gene Ther. 2014, 21, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Hoeflich, K.P.; O’Brien, C.; Boyd, Z.; Cavet, G.; Guerrero, S.; Jung, K.; Januario, T.; Savage, H.; Punnoose, E.; Truong, T.; et al. In Vivo Antitumor Activity of MEK and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Inhibitors in Basal-Like Breast Cancer Models. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 4649–4664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Koboldt, D.C.; Fulton, R.S.; McLellan, M.D.; Schmidt, H.; Kalicki-Veizer, J.; McMichael, J.F.; Fulton, L.L.; Dooling, D.J.; Ding, L.; Mardis, E.R.; et al. Comprehensive Molecular Portraits of Human Breast Tumours. Nature 2012, 490, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Zhao, M.; Howard, E.W.; Parris, A.B.; Guo, Z.; Zhao, Q.; Yang, X. Alcohol Promotes Migration and Invasion of Triple-negative Breast Cancer Cells through Activation of P38 MAPK and JNK. Mol. Carcinog. 2017, 56, 849–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Uehara, N.; Kanematsu, S.; Miki, H.; Yoshizawa, K.; Tsubura, A. Requirement of P38 MAPK for a Cell-Death Pathway Triggered by Vorinostat in MDA-MB-231 Human Breast Cancer Cells. Cancer Lett. 2012, 315, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Peng, B.; He, R.; Xu, Q.; Yang, Y.; Hu, Q.; Hou, H.; Liu, X.; Li, J. Ginsenoside 20(S)-Protopanaxadiol Inhibits Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Metastasis in Vivo by Targeting EGFR-Mediated MAPK Pathway. Pharmacol. Res. 2019, 142, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Duncan, J.S.; Whittle, M.C.; Nakamura, K.; Abell, A.N.; Midland, A.A.; Zawistowski, J.S.; Johnson, N.L.; Granger, D.A.; Jordan, N.V.; Darr, D.B.; et al. Dynamic Reprogramming of the Kinome in Response to Targeted MEK Inhibition in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cell 2012, 149, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Swearingen, A.E.D.V.; Sambade, M.J.; Siegel, M.B.; Sud, S.; McNeill, R.S.; Bevill, S.M.; Chen, X.; Bash, R.E.; Mounsey, L.; Golitz, B.T.; et al. Combined Kinase Inhibitors of MEK1/2 and Either PI3K or PDGFR Are Efficacious in Intracranial Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Neuro Oncol. 2017, 19, 1481–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Park, B.J.; Whichard, Z.L.; Corey, S.J. Dasatinib Synergizes with Both Cytotoxic and Signal Transduction Inhibitors in Heterogeneous Breast Cancer Cell Lines—Lessons for Design of Combination Targeted Therapy. Cancer Lett. 2012, 320, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  141. Ramaswamy, B.; Mrozek, E.; Lustberg, M.; Wesolowski, R.; Layman, R.; Abdel-Rasoul, M.; Timmers, C.; Patrick, R.; Sexton, J.; Macrae, E.; et al. Abstract LB-216: NCI 9455: Phase II Study of Trametinib Followed by Trametinib plus AKT Inhibitor, GSK2141795 in Patients with Advanced Triple Negative Breast Cancer. In Proceedings of the AACR 107th Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, USA, 16–20 April 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cancers 13 01205 g001 550
Figure 1. Treatment with AT7867 induced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells’ sensitivity to gefitinib. (A) PKI + gefitinib screening results in MDA-MB-231 cells. The numbers of combination points with CI > 1.3 was indexed (see the Materials and Methods). The numbers on the right of each bar are the mean CI values of indicated drugs. (B) MTT screening results for AT7867 with gefitinib. MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with an increasing concentrations of AT7867 and gefitinib for 72 hr. The viable cells was measured by MTT assay. (C) The combination effect of gefitinib with AT7867 in two MSL TNBC cells. Data represent mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments performed in triplicate. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01.
Figure 1. Treatment with AT7867 induced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells’ sensitivity to gefitinib. (A) PKI + gefitinib screening results in MDA-MB-231 cells. The numbers of combination points with CI > 1.3 was indexed (see the Materials and Methods). The numbers on the right of each bar are the mean CI values of indicated drugs. (B) MTT screening results for AT7867 with gefitinib. MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with an increasing concentrations of AT7867 and gefitinib for 72 hr. The viable cells was measured by MTT assay. (C) The combination effect of gefitinib with AT7867 in two MSL TNBC cells. Data represent mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments performed in triplicate. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01.
Cancers 13 01205 g001
Cancers 13 01205 g002 550
Figure 2. A combination of AT7867 and gefitinib-induced tetraploid gap 1 (G1) arrest in MDA-MB-231 cells. (A) Representative histograms of cell cycle analysis in MDA-MB-231 cells in the presence of each drug or gefitinib and AT7867 (Gefi+AT7867). (B) Relative distribution of cell cycle phases.
Figure 2. A combination of AT7867 and gefitinib-induced tetraploid gap 1 (G1) arrest in MDA-MB-231 cells. (A) Representative histograms of cell cycle analysis in MDA-MB-231 cells in the presence of each drug or gefitinib and AT7867 (Gefi+AT7867). (B) Relative distribution of cell cycle phases.
Cancers 13 01205 g002
Cancers 13 01205 g003 550
Figure 3. Gefitinib and AT7867 reduced the survival of MSL subtype TNBC cells. (A) MDA-MB-231 and HS578T cells were treated with 10 μM Gefitinib, 5 μM AT7867, or 10 μM Gefitinib + 5 μM AT7867 (Gefi+AT) for 24 h in normal growth media. Then, cells were washed and cultivated for additional 10–14 days in normal growth media. The colonies were stained as described in the Materials and Methods. Representative images are shown from three independent experiments performed in triplicate (B) The relative colony number was determined and presented as mean ± SEM from three independent experiments performed in triplicate. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01.
Figure 3. Gefitinib and AT7867 reduced the survival of MSL subtype TNBC cells. (A) MDA-MB-231 and HS578T cells were treated with 10 μM Gefitinib, 5 μM AT7867, or 10 μM Gefitinib + 5 μM AT7867 (Gefi+AT) for 24 h in normal growth media. Then, cells were washed and cultivated for additional 10–14 days in normal growth media. The colonies were stained as described in the Materials and Methods. Representative images are shown from three independent experiments performed in triplicate (B) The relative colony number was determined and presented as mean ± SEM from three independent experiments performed in triplicate. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01.
Cancers 13 01205 g003
Cancers 13 01205 g004 550
Figure 4. Cell signaling in Gefi+AT7867-treated TNBC cells. Cells were treated with different drug combinations for indicated times. Cell lysates were subjected to Western blot (Figure S1) analysis with antibodies for indicated proteins.
Figure 4. Cell signaling in Gefi+AT7867-treated TNBC cells. Cells were treated with different drug combinations for indicated times. Cell lysates were subjected to Western blot (Figure S1) analysis with antibodies for indicated proteins.
Cancers 13 01205 g004
Cancers 13 01205 g005a 550Cancers 13 01205 g005b 550
Figure 5. Antibody array analysis. (A) Fluorescence images of the antibody arrays. (B) Scatter plots of fluorescence signals; intensities of the control sample were plotted on the x-axis, and intensities of the test sample were plotted on the y-axis. Red and green lines indicate a 1.5-fold increase and decrease in fluorescence intensities, respectively, compared with the control sample. (C) The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway map for MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway identified by antibody array analysis. Blue color indicates upregulated molecules. The KEGG pathway map was kindly provided by Kanehisa Laboratories (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan).
Figure 5. Antibody array analysis. (A) Fluorescence images of the antibody arrays. (B) Scatter plots of fluorescence signals; intensities of the control sample were plotted on the x-axis, and intensities of the test sample were plotted on the y-axis. Red and green lines indicate a 1.5-fold increase and decrease in fluorescence intensities, respectively, compared with the control sample. (C) The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway map for MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway identified by antibody array analysis. Blue color indicates upregulated molecules. The KEGG pathway map was kindly provided by Kanehisa Laboratories (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan).
Cancers 13 01205 g005aCancers 13 01205 g005b
Cancers 13 01205 g006 550
Figure 6. Synergistic anti-proliferative effect in TNBC cells via additional inhibition of the MEK/ERK pathway in the presence of Gefi+A7867. (A) Results of the MEK/ERK inhibitor screening with Gefi+AT7867 in MDA-MB-231 cells. The numbers of combination points with a CI > 1.3 are depicted, and the numbers on the top of each bar are the mean CI values of the indicated drugs. (B) The combination effects of PD-0325901 in the presence of Gefi+AT7867 in two TNBC cells. Cells were treated with serially diluted concentrations of PD-0325901 in the presence of Gefi+AT7867 for 72 h. Data represent mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments performed in triplicate. ** p < 0.01.
Figure 6. Synergistic anti-proliferative effect in TNBC cells via additional inhibition of the MEK/ERK pathway in the presence of Gefi+A7867. (A) Results of the MEK/ERK inhibitor screening with Gefi+AT7867 in MDA-MB-231 cells. The numbers of combination points with a CI > 1.3 are depicted, and the numbers on the top of each bar are the mean CI values of the indicated drugs. (B) The combination effects of PD-0325901 in the presence of Gefi+AT7867 in two TNBC cells. Cells were treated with serially diluted concentrations of PD-0325901 in the presence of Gefi+AT7867 for 72 h. Data represent mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments performed in triplicate. ** p < 0.01.
Cancers 13 01205 g006
Cancers 13 01205 g007 550
Figure 7. Cell cycle analysis of MDA-MB-231 cells treated with a triple combination of gefitinib and AT7867 and PD-0326901(A–H). Representative histograms of cell cycle analysis in MDA-MB-231 cells in the presence of each drug or combinations of drugs as indicated. Abbreviations: AT, AT7867; Gefi, gefitinib; and PD-0325901.
Figure 7. Cell cycle analysis of MDA-MB-231 cells treated with a triple combination of gefitinib and AT7867 and PD-0326901(A–H). Representative histograms of cell cycle analysis in MDA-MB-231 cells in the presence of each drug or combinations of drugs as indicated. Abbreviations: AT, AT7867; Gefi, gefitinib; and PD-0325901.
Cancers 13 01205 g007
Cancers 13 01205 g008 550
Figure 8. Reduced colony formation of MSL TNBC cells treated with gefitinib andAT7867 and PD-0326901. (A) Representative images of the colonies; cells were treated with 10 μM of gefitinib, 2.5 μM of AT7867, and 10 μM of PD-0325901, or other drug combinations (as indicated) for 24 h and further cultivated for 10–14 days to form colonies in normal growth media. The surviving colonies were stained and scanned using an image scanner. Three independent experiments were performed in triplicate and representative images are shown. (B) Relative colony numbers were determined and presented as mean ± SEM. ** p < 0.01.
Figure 8. Reduced colony formation of MSL TNBC cells treated with gefitinib andAT7867 and PD-0326901. (A) Representative images of the colonies; cells were treated with 10 μM of gefitinib, 2.5 μM of AT7867, and 10 μM of PD-0325901, or other drug combinations (as indicated) for 24 h and further cultivated for 10–14 days to form colonies in normal growth media. The surviving colonies were stained and scanned using an image scanner. Three independent experiments were performed in triplicate and representative images are shown. (B) Relative colony numbers were determined and presented as mean ± SEM. ** p < 0.01.
Cancers 13 01205 g008
Cancers 13 01205 g009 550
Figure 9. Western blot analysis of TNBC cells treated with different drug combinations (Figure S2). The cells were treated with drug combinations for 24 h, and the cell lysates were resolved on SDS-PAGE and proved with antibodies for indicated proteins.
Figure 9. Western blot analysis of TNBC cells treated with different drug combinations (Figure S2). The cells were treated with drug combinations for 24 h, and the cell lysates were resolved on SDS-PAGE and proved with antibodies for indicated proteins.
Cancers 13 01205 g009
Cancers 13 01205 g010 550
Figure 10. Putative Pathways affected by small-molecule inhibitors in this study. The PI3K/AKT/mTORC1 and RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathways cross-talk each other. Small-molecule PKIs used in this study would inhibit their target molecules, which results in synergistic anti-cancer effects. Abbreviations: 4E-BP1, eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1; AKT, v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog; c-Myc, cellular myelocytomatosis; CREB, cAMP responsive element-binding protein; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; eIF4E, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E; ELK-1, E twenty-six (ETS) like-1; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; GF, growth factor; MEK, MAPK/ERK kinase; mTORC1/2, mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1/2; PDK1, 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase; PKA, protein kinase A; PKC, protein kinase C; RAF, v-raf-1 murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog; RAS, rat sarcoma; RPS6, ribosomal protein S6; RSK, ribosomal S6 kinase; RTK, receptor tyrosine kinase; S6K, S6 kinase; TSC1/2, Tuberous sclerosis 1/2.
Figure 10. Putative Pathways affected by small-molecule inhibitors in this study. The PI3K/AKT/mTORC1 and RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathways cross-talk each other. Small-molecule PKIs used in this study would inhibit their target molecules, which results in synergistic anti-cancer effects. Abbreviations: 4E-BP1, eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1; AKT, v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog; c-Myc, cellular myelocytomatosis; CREB, cAMP responsive element-binding protein; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; eIF4E, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E; ELK-1, E twenty-six (ETS) like-1; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; GF, growth factor; MEK, MAPK/ERK kinase; mTORC1/2, mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1/2; PDK1, 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase; PKA, protein kinase A; PKC, protein kinase C; RAF, v-raf-1 murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog; RAS, rat sarcoma; RPS6, ribosomal protein S6; RSK, ribosomal S6 kinase; RTK, receptor tyrosine kinase; S6K, S6 kinase; TSC1/2, Tuberous sclerosis 1/2.
Cancers 13 01205 g010
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

You, K.S.; Yi, Y.W.; Cho, J.; Seong, Y.-S. Dual Inhibition of AKT and MEK Pathways Potentiates the Anti-Cancer Effect of Gefitinib in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells. Cancers 2021, 13, 1205. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13061205

AMA Style

You KS, Yi YW, Cho J, Seong Y-S. Dual Inhibition of AKT and MEK Pathways Potentiates the Anti-Cancer Effect of Gefitinib in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells. Cancers. 2021; 13(6):1205. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13061205

Chicago/Turabian Style

You, Kyu Sic, Yong Weon Yi, Jeonghee Cho, and Yeon-Sun Seong. 2021. "Dual Inhibition of AKT and MEK Pathways Potentiates the Anti-Cancer Effect of Gefitinib in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells" Cancers 13, no. 6: 1205. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13061205

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop