Next Article in Journal
Preoperative Nutrition-Based Interventions in Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgeries—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Fermented Foods and the Gut–Liver Axis: Modulation of MASLD Through Gut Microbiota
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of Protein Intake on Training Response in Chronic Lung Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Multimodal Therapeutic Strategies for the Management of Sarcopenia and Frailty in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Review

1
Department of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, 1083 Budapest, Hungary
2
Institue of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
3
Fonyod Health Center, 8640 Fonyod, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nutrients 2026, 18(3), 543; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18030543
Submission received: 4 January 2026 / Revised: 27 January 2026 / Accepted: 3 February 2026 / Published: 6 February 2026

Abstract

Introduction: Sarcopenia and frailty are prevalent yet under-recognized contributors to disability, impaired quality of life, and adverse outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Shared mechanisms, including systemic inflammation, hormonal dysregulation, malnutrition, and physical inactivity, render these syndromes important targets for multimodal intervention. This review summarizes current evidence on exercise-based, nutritional, pharmacological, and adjunctive strategies for their management in COPD. Materials and Methods: This narrative review is based on a structured literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase to identify relevant studies published between January 2000 and May 2025. Eligible publications included randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and observational studies involving adults with COPD and documented sarcopenia and/or frailty. Interventions were categorized by modality, and outcomes included muscle mass, strength, physical performance, quality of life, and hospitalizations. Data were synthesized thematically. Results: Resistance and combined exercise training consistently improved muscle strength and physical function, while endurance training enhanced cardiorespiratory capacity, particularly within pulmonary rehabilitation programs. Nutritional interventions, especially protein, leucine, or β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate supplementation, supported gains in lean mass and exercise tolerance. Pharmacological strategies, including anabolic hormones and myostatin inhibitors, showed early promise but require further evaluation regarding safety and long-term efficacy. Adjunctive therapies, such as neuromuscular electrical stimulation and oxygen supplementation, benefited patients unable to participate in conventional exercise training. Conclusions: An integrated, multimodal approach combining structured exercise training and targeted nutritional support should be considered a cornerstone of COPD management to prevent and treat sarcopenia and frailty. Personalized rehabilitation strategies can substantially improve functional outcomes and quality of life, while future research should prioritize biomarker-guided personalization and long-term intervention studies.

1. Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive respiratory condition characterized by persistent airflow limitation and chronic systemic inflammation [1,2]. While primarily affecting the lungs, COPD is increasingly recognized as a systemic disorder with significant extra-pulmonary manifestations [3,4]. Among the most debilitating of these are sarcopenia, defined as the progressive and generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength, and frailty, a multi-dimensional syndrome marked by reduced physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to stressors [5,6].
According to the revised European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2) consensus, sarcopenia is diagnosed based on the presence of low muscle strength as the primary parameter, confirmed by low muscle quantity or quality, and further characterized by impaired physical performance to define severity [6,7]. Diagnostic assessment typically involves handgrip strength, chair stand tests, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and functional performance measures such as gait speed or the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) [8]. In contrast, frailty is conceptualized as a broader clinical syndrome encompassing physical, psychological, cognitive, and social vulnerability [9]. Common diagnostic frameworks include the Fried frailty phenotype, which focuses on physical components such as weakness, slowness, exhaustion, weight loss, and low physical activity, and the Rockwood frailty index, which operationalizes frailty as the accumulation of health deficits across multiple domains [10,11]. Thus, while sarcopenia primarily reflects skeletal muscle impairment, frailty represents a multidimensional vulnerability state, of which sarcopenia constitutes a central but not exclusive component [10,12].
These two conditions often coexist in COPD patients, particularly in advanced stages of the disease, and contribute significantly to adverse health outcomes [1,8,10]. Their overlap reflects shared underlying biological mechanisms, yet their partial independence underscores the importance of parallel but distinct diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
The burden of sarcopenia and frailty on COPD outcomes is substantial [13]. Both are independently associated with decreased exercise capacity, greater symptom burden, impaired health-related quality of life, increased frequency and severity of exacerbations, longer hospital stays, higher rates of institutionalization, and increased all-cause mortality [8,10,14]. Their presence compounds the effects of respiratory dysfunction, accelerating disease progression and complicating clinical management. Despite their profound impact, sarcopenia and frailty are frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated in routine COPD care [3,4,15].
Several COPD-specific mechanisms contribute to the development of sarcopenia and frailty [16,17]. Chronic systemic inflammation, driven by persistent airway irritation and recurrent exacerbations, promotes proteolysis and suppresses anabolic signaling [18,19]. Hypoxemia and oxidative stress impair mitochondrial function and muscle bioenergetics, while endocrine alterations, including testosterone deficiency and insulin resistance, further compromise muscle homeostasis [20,21]. In parallel, physical inactivity due to dyspnea, fatigue, and fear of exertion accelerates deconditioning, whereas nutritional insufficiency, anorexia, and altered metabolism exacerbate negative protein balance [22,23,24]. Collectively, these interrelated processes establish a vicious cycle of muscle wasting, functional decline, and escalating vulnerability.
The pathophysiology of these conditions in the context of COPD is therefore complex and multifactorial. Importantly, sarcopenia and frailty also amplify respiratory impairment by weakening ventilatory muscles, reducing exercise tolerance, impairing cough effectiveness, and increasing susceptibility to infections and exacerbations, thereby directly contributing to disease instability and healthcare utilization [25,26]. These systemic factors interact with behavioral and social determinants of health, creating a vicious cycle of functional decline and increased healthcare utilization.
Given this complexity, early and effective interventions are critical to alter the trajectory of sarcopenia and frailty in COPD [27]. Intervening at an early stage may help preserve muscle function, enhance physical resilience, and ultimately reduce the risk of adverse outcomes [28]. However, due to the multifactorial nature of these conditions, a single-modality treatment is unlikely to be sufficient. Instead, growing and increasingly robust clinical evidence supports the need for a multimodal therapeutic approach, integrating exercise training, nutritional support, pharmacologic agents, and adjunctive modalities such as oxygen therapy and tele-rehabilitation [29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. These interventions must be personalized and sustained to be effective in real-world clinical settings. This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of current and emerging therapeutic interventions targeting sarcopenia and frailty in patients with COPD.

Objectives

The primary aim of this review is to critically evaluate current evidence on the role of exercise and nutritional interventions in the prevention and management of sarcopenia and frailty in patients with COPD. Specifically, we aim to:
-
Synthesize mechanistic insights linking COPD-related pathophysiology to skeletal muscle dysfunction and systemic frailty;
-
Critically assess the effectiveness of different exercise modalities and nutritional strategies, both as standalone and combined interventions;
-
Identify key knowledge gaps and methodological limitations in the existing literature; and
-
Propose clinically relevant perspectives for integrated, personalized intervention strategies targeting muscle health and functional capacity in COPD.
By adopting an integrative and translational perspective, this review seeks to provide practical guidance for clinicians and researchers and to highlight future directions for improving functional outcomes and quality of life in this vulnerable patient population.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design and Conceptual Framework of the Review

This article was designed as a narrative, integrative review aimed at synthesizing and critically evaluating the current and emerging evidence on therapeutic strategies targeting sarcopenia and frailty in patients with COPD. Rather than applying the rigid methodological framework of a formal systematic review, we adopted a broad, hypothesis-generating and translational perspective, allowing conceptual integration across heterogeneous study designs, intervention modalities, and mechanistic domains. This narrative approach was selected to enable a comprehensive evaluation of complex, multifactorial interventions, facilitate clinical interpretation, and identify emerging therapeutic concepts and research gaps relevant to personalized COPD care.

2.2. Search Strategy and Data Sources

A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies examining interventions targeting sarcopenia and frailty in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were systematically searched for peer-reviewed articles published between January 2000 and May 2025. The search strategy combined controlled vocabulary (MeSH terms) and free-text keywords, including: “COPD,” “chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,” “sarcopenia,” “frailty,” “muscle wasting,” “rehabilitation,” “exercise therapy,” “nutritional supplementation,” “pharmacologic therapy,” “tele-rehabilitation,” “neuromuscular electrical stimulation,” and “multimodal intervention,” used in various combinations. Boolean operators (“AND,” “OR”) were applied to optimize sensitivity and specificity. Search results were limited to studies published in English and involving human participants. In addition, reference lists of eligible studies and relevant review articles were manually screened to identify additional pertinent publications.

2.3. Eligibility Criteria

Studies were considered eligible if they met the following criteria: (i) adult participants (≥18 years) with a clinical diagnosis of COPD; (ii) documented assessment of sarcopenia and/or frailty based on established diagnostic criteria; and (iii) evaluation of therapeutic interventions targeting these conditions. Eligible study designs included randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled studies, observational cohort and case–control studies, and high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Primary outcomes of interest were changes in muscle mass, muscle strength, physical performance, and frailty status. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, exercise capacity, hospitalization rates, exacerbation frequency, and mortality.
Studies were excluded if they: (i) did not explicitly assess sarcopenia or frailty; (ii) involved pediatric populations; (iii) were case reports, conference abstracts, editorials, or narrative commentaries without original data; or (iv) lacked peer review.

2.4. Data Extraction and Narrative Synthesis

Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers using a standardized data collection framework. Extracted information included study design, population characteristics, diagnostic definitions, intervention modalities, outcome measures, and principal findings. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion and consensus.
Given the substantial heterogeneity in study populations, interventions, and outcome definitions, a narrative synthesis approach was adopted rather than quantitative meta-analysis. Studies were grouped thematically according to intervention categories, and findings were synthesized with emphasis on clinical applicability, mechanistic insights, comparative effectiveness, and translational relevance.

2.5. Study Selection Process and Flow Diagram

The study selection process followed a structured narrative approach to ensure transparency and comprehensive coverage of the relevant literature. Records identified through database searches were initially screened based on titles and abstracts, followed by full-text evaluation of potentially relevant publications. Studies meeting the predefined thematic and methodological criteria were subsequently included in the narrative synthesis. The overall workflow of the literature selection process is summarized in the flow diagram (Figure 1).

3. Results

This narrative review includes a total of 120 relevant publications, comprising systematic and narrative reviews as well as original clinical studies. Of these, 46 studies are presented in detail in tabulated form to provide a structured comparison of the most important intervention strategies, study designs, and clinical outcomes. The results are organized thematically according to the major intervention domains. In addition, selected clinical data from our pulmonary rehabilitation cohort are presented for illustrative purposes to contextualize the reviewed evidence and to highlight the real-world relevance of body composition assessment in COPD management.

Principles of Management

Managing sarcopenia and frailty in COPD requires a shift from reactive treatment to a proactive, personalized, and multidisciplinary approach [36]. Given the complex and multifactorial nature of these conditions, intervention must be comprehensive and initiated early to be most effective. Multidisciplinary teams—including pulmonologists, physiotherapists, nutritionists, geriatricians, and mental health professionals—work collaboratively to address the wide-ranging physiological, nutritional, and psychosocial needs of patients, ultimately improving outcomes and ensuring continuity of care [37]. Personalized strategies, guided by thorough assessments of physical function, nutritional status, and, where available, emerging biomarkers, help tailor interventions to each patient’s specific disease severity and comorbidities [38]. Initiating treatment during the pre-frail stage offers the best chance of reversing or slowing progression, whereas late-stage management focuses on maintaining function and reducing complications. Incorporating routine screening and, in the future, digital health tools may further support early detection and timely, targeted intervention [39].

4. Exercise-Based Interventions

Exercise training is a fundamental therapeutic approach for managing sarcopenia and frailty in COPD, as it mitigates muscle wasting, enhances exercise tolerance, and reduces the risk of exacerbations [17]. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) represents the most comprehensive framework, combining structured exercise with education, nutritional support, and psychosocial care [14,40,41]. This multidimensional strategy not only improves pulmonary outcomes but also directly addresses systemic impairments contributing to sarcopenia and frailty [14,40,41]. Despite robust evidence of its efficacy, PR is frequently underutilized due to barriers such as limited accessibility, comorbidities, and poor adherence, highlighting the importance of individualized and flexible program designs [42].

4.1. Resistance Training

Resistance training (RT) is the most effective intervention for increasing muscle mass and strength in sarcopenic patients with COPD [43]. By promoting hypertrophy through mechanical overload and anabolic signaling, RT enhances quadriceps size, walking distance, and daily functional performance [44]. Compared with endurance modalities, it produces greater improvements in muscle strength and reduces fall risk, though implementation requires access to equipment, supervision, and progressive load adjustments [45]. These demands may pose challenges for severely frail individuals, but when carefully individualized, RT consistently yields substantial functional benefits, making it a cornerstone of rehabilitation strategies.

4.2. Endurance and Aerobic Training

Endurance training targets cardiovascular fitness, oxidative metabolism, and ventilatory efficiency, contributing to improved exercise tolerance, dyspnea management, and quality of life [46]. While its impact on muscle hypertrophy is limited, endurance training remains accessible and well-integrated into PR. Interval training, involving alternating bouts of higher-intensity activity with recovery, is particularly valuable for patients with severe dyspnea or poor exercise tolerance [47]. It improves walking distance and aerobic capacity with reduced perceived exertion compared to continuous training, though it requires close monitoring to ensure both safety and adherence [48].

4.3. Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs

Comprehensive PR programs combine resistance and endurance exercise with education, nutritional guidance, and psychosocial support, addressing both pulmonary limitations and systemic contributors to frailty and sarcopenia [49]. Evidence indicates that sarcopenic patients achieve outcomes comparable to, or even exceeding, those without sarcopenia when enrolled in PR [50]. Benefits include improved frailty indices, muscle strength, exercise capacity, and health-related quality of life. Nonetheless, real-world effectiveness is hindered by barriers such as transportation difficulties, comorbidities, and low completion rates. Program adherence remains the strongest predictor of long-term outcomes, underscoring the importance of strategies that support sustained participation [51].
To illustrate the clinical relevance and real-world applicability of body composition assessment in pulmonary rehabilitation, we present representative baseline data from 352 COPD patients participating in our institutional PR program (Table 1).
This cohort demonstrates a high prevalence of increased adiposity, reduced relative skeletal muscle mass, and elevated visceral fat, underscoring the frequent coexistence of sarcopenic obesity and metabolic dysregulation in COPD. These findings reinforce the importance of integrating targeted nutritional strategies and quality-of-life interventions alongside exercise training to optimize functional recovery, enhance exercise tolerance, and improve long-term prognosis. Importantly, these data are provided for contextual and illustrative purposes and are not intended as a primary outcome analysis.

4.4. Home-Based and Tele-Rehabilitation Approaches

Home-based and tele-rehabilitation (tele-PR) programs have emerged as practical alternatives to traditional center-based rehabilitation, particularly for patients with mobility limitations or geographic barriers [34,52]. These approaches, supported by digital platforms, wearable devices, and remote supervision, have demonstrated efficacy comparable to conventional PR in improving the six-minute walk distance, dyspnea, and quality of life [34,52]. However, their success is contingent upon patient motivation, digital literacy, and access to reliable technology. Novel strategies, including caregiver involvement, behavior-change interventions, and artificial intelligence-assisted exercise prescription, show promise in improving adherence, though evidence regarding long-term sustainability and clinical outcomes remains limited [53].

4.5. Indications and Clinical Rationale for Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) represents a passive training modality for patients with advanced frailty or severe exercise intolerance who are unable to participate in conventional exercise programs. By eliciting muscle contractions through externally applied electrical impulses, NMES may improve muscle strength, endurance, and tolerance to physical activity, thereby serving as a valuable adjunct to comprehensive rehabilitation strategies [35]. Although its effects on peak power output and muscle hypertrophy appear less consistent than those achieved with traditional resistance training, NMES has demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in functional status and quality of life among highly deconditioned individuals [54]. Accordingly, integration of NMES into multimodal rehabilitation frameworks may facilitate broader access to exercise-based interventions in the most vulnerable COPD populations [55].

4.6. Resistance and Endurance Training

Endurance and resistance training improve physiological parameters through complementary mechanisms [56]. Resistance training primarily enhances muscle strength, muscle mass, frailty status, and quality of life, whereas endurance training mainly improves cardiovascular fitness, metabolic efficiency, frailty indices, and lung mechanics, thereby influencing exercise tolerance, oxygen uptake, dyspnea, and health-related quality of life [45]. Combining both modalities within structured, individualized rehabilitation programs allows for synergistic benefits, addressing both peripheral muscle dysfunction and cardiopulmonary limitations, and represents the optimal strategy for comprehensive functional restoration in COPD [57]. Collectively, these findings support a phenotype-driven, multimodal rehabilitation paradigm in COPD, where intervention selection is guided by baseline muscle mass, functional capacity, frailty status, and comorbidity burden. Key exercise-based interventions targeting sarcopenia and frailty in COPD, including resistance and endurance training, pulmonary rehabilitation, home-based programs, and NMES, are summarized in Table 2.

5. Nutritional Interventions

Malnutrition, sarcopenia, and frailty commonly co-occur in COPD due to systemic inflammation, hypermetabolism, and impaired protein turnover, all of which accelerate muscle catabolism, impair functional capacity, and worsen clinical outcomes [73,74]. Disease-related undernutrition further exacerbates sarcopenia, highlighting the importance of tailored nutritional strategies to preserve muscle mass and function [75].

5.1. Protein and Amino Acid Supplementation

Adequate protein intake, generally recommended at 1.2–2.0 g/kg/day, is essential to preserve muscle mass in COPD, particularly when combined with exercise training [76]. Supplementation with leucine, leucine-enriched essential amino acids, or β-hydroxy β-methylbutyrate (HMB) enhances anabolic signaling through mTOR activation and has been shown to improve lean body mass and strength [33,74,77]. Optimizing timing and distribution, particularly with post-exercise intake, further augments the anabolic response. Nevertheless, anabolic resistance in older adults and individuals with advanced COPD may blunt the full benefits, underscoring the need for higher-quality or specifically enriched protein formulations [78].

5.2. Caloric Optimization and Energy Balance

Because patients with COPD often experience a 10–15% increase in energy requirements due to hyper-metabolism and catabolic stress, nutritional interventions must prioritize energy-dense, protein-rich diets [79]. Oral nutritional supplements (ONS) enriched with protein, vitamins, and minerals have consistently improved body weight, lean mass, and physical function in undernourished patients (Table 3). Macronutrient distribution should emphasize high-quality protein, balanced carbohydrate intake to minimize CO2 production, and healthy fats to ensure caloric adequacy. Adherence to these regimens may be challenging due to appetite loss, early satiety, and dyspnea during meals, but targeted strategies can mitigate these barriers [80].

5.3. Micronutrient Support

Specific micronutrients also play critical roles in muscle health and frailty prevention. Vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent in COPD and is associated with impaired muscle function and increased exacerbation risk; supplementation with 800–2000 IU/day is recommended in deficient individuals, though benefits appear limited to those with baseline deficiency [29,31,85,86]. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (EPA and DHA) exert anti-inflammatory and anabolic effects, supporting muscle preservation and exercise capacity, especially when combined with exercise [87,88,89,90]. Antioxidant micronutrients such as vitamins C and E and selenium may reduce oxidative stress, though their impact on sarcopenia outcomes remains inconclusive, reflecting heterogeneity in trial results (Table 3).

5.4. Delivery Models and Challenges

Optimal delivery of nutritional interventions requires individualized dietary counseling, ideally provided by registered dietitians [33,91,92]. Counseling should address macronutrient balance, micronutrient adequacy, meal timing, and appropriate use of oral nutritional supplements [93]. Multidisciplinary management that integrates nutritional strategies with exercise and psychosocial support is essential to improve adherence and achieve sustainable benefits [94]. Barriers such as socioeconomic constraints, limited service access, appetite loss, and poor tolerance of supplements often undermine outcomes, highlighting the need for personalized, flexible, and long-term approaches.

6. Pharmacological and Experimental Therapies

In advanced COPD or in patients unable to engage in exercise or nutritional programs, pharmacological and experimental interventions provide potential adjunctive or alternative strategies [95]. These approaches target mechanisms underlying muscle wasting, including hormonal imbalance, chronic inflammation, and impaired myogenesis [96]. The main therapeutic domains encompass anabolic hormone therapy, anti-inflammatory and metabolic agents, myostatin inhibition, and respiratory-targeted interventions with indirect benefits [96,97].

6.1. Anabolic Hormone Therapy

Testosterone and other androgens stimulate muscle protein synthesis, satellite cell activation, and neuromuscular function. Clinical trials in COPD show modest improvements in lean mass, muscle strength, and exercise capacity, particularly when testosterone is combined with training [98]. However, adverse events—including erythrocytosis, cardiovascular complications, and prostate-related risks—restrict its use to hypogonadal patients under specialist monitoring. Growth hormone (GH) acting through the IGF-1 pathway, can promote muscle regeneration but produces inconsistent functional benefits and frequently causes side effects such as glucose intolerance, insulin resistance, and edema [27]. Selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs), such as enobosarm, provide a more targeted anabolic effect with reduced androgenic toxicity. Early studies in catabolic conditions demonstrate increased muscle mass, though COPD-specific data remain sparse. Collectively, anabolic hormone strategies show potential for enhancing lean body mass, but their effects on functional outcomes are mixed, and safety concerns limit their widespread adoption [47,98].

6.2. Anti-Inflammatory and Metabolic Agents

Chronic systemic inflammation in COPD drives catabolism through cytokine-mediated protein degradation and mitochondrial dysfunction [99]. Several pharmacological agents target these pathways. Statins exert anti-inflammatory effects and may attenuate cytokine-driven muscle breakdown; however, their benefit in sarcopenia is inconsistent, and the risk of myopathy limits applicability [100]. Metformin, via AMPK activation, enhances mitochondrial biogenesis and reduces systemic inflammation [101]. Preliminary findings suggest it may help preserve muscle mass and function in older adults, though its role in COPD remains under investigation. Anti-cytokine therapies, such as TNF-α inhibitors, theoretically mitigate cachexia but have limited clinical data in COPD and carry substantial infection risks [102]. Thus, while anti-inflammatory and metabolic therapies represent mechanistically appealing interventions, their current evidence base is insufficient for routine application [100].

6.3. Myostatin Inhibitors and Emerging Molecules

The myostatin signaling pathway negatively regulates muscle growth and is upregulated in COPD-associated sarcopenia [103]. Pharmacological inhibition of this pathway has attracted considerable attention. Bimagrumab, an anti-ActRIIB monoclonal antibody, significantly increases lean mass in phase II trials, yet functional improvements such as strength and exercise capacity have been minimal, emphasizing the necessity of pairing pharmacotherapy with exercise-based rehabilitation [104,105]. Other experimental strategies include agents such as espindolol, which combines anabolic and β-blocking effects, follistatin-based gene therapies to enhance hypertrophy, and mitochondrial-targeted antioxidants to combat oxidative stress [103]. While promising in preclinical and early-phase studies, these agents remain unapproved, and their long-term safety and efficacy in COPD are unproven [104,105].

6.4. Respiratory-Targeted Therapies with Indirect Benefits

Although not primarily developed for sarcopenia or frailty, pharmacological and procedural interventions targeting pulmonary function may indirectly preserve skeletal muscle by improving ventilatory efficiency, reducing dyspnea, and enhancing physical activity tolerance. Long-acting bronchodilators, including LABAs (e.g., salmeterol) and LAMAs (e.g., tiotropium), reduce dynamic hyperinflation and improve exertional tolerance [106]. Evidence consistently shows that they facilitate participation in rehabilitation and support functional improvements, though they exert minimal direct anabolic effects [106]. Inhaled corticosteroids, particularly when combined with LABAs, decrease airway inflammation but have limited systemic impact on muscle preservation; unlike systemic corticosteroids, they carry a lower risk of myopathy [107]. Lung volume reduction interventions—surgical or bronchoscopic—restore diaphragmatic function, reduce hyperinflation, and alleviate exertional dyspnea. Trials, including the National Emphysema Treatment Trial, confirm improvements in quality of life and functional outcomes, though risks and strict selection criteria limit eligibility [108]. Long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) improves survival in hypoxemic COPD and may reduce oxidative stress–mediated wasting, whereas non-invasive ventilation (NIV) reduces respiratory workload, facilitates sleep, and allows higher-intensity rehabilitation, modalities support muscle preservation indirectly but face challenges related to adherence and patient selection [109,110,111] (Table 4).

7. Non-Pharmacologic and Adjunctive Therapies

Non-pharmacologic interventions are essential in the management of sarcopenia and frailty in COPD, especially for patients unable to participate in exercise-based or pharmacological pro-grams. These approaches aim to preserve independence, optimize functional capacity, and ad-dress physical, cognitive, psychological, and social dimensions, either as stand-alone strategies or within comprehensive rehabilitation frameworks [127].

7.1. Practical Implementation and Protocol Considerations for Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation applies low-frequency electrical currents to induce involuntary muscle contractions and constitutes a practical therapeutic option for deconditioned patients with COPD who are unable to engage in conventional exercise training. Evidence from clinical trials and meta-analyses indicates improvements in quadriceps strength, muscle mass, endurance, mobility, and quality of life following NMES interventions [35]. Standard protocols typically involve stimulation frequencies of 35–50 Hz, pulse widths of 200–400 µs, and session durations of 20–60 min, administered five to seven days per week over a period of four to six weeks. Despite these benefits, NMES use may be limited by discomfort, equipment dependency, and interindividual variability in responsiveness, underscoring the need for supervision and individualized parameter adjustment [64].

7.2. Oxygen Therapy in Frail COPD Patients

Long-term oxygen therapy plays a critical role in patients with hypoxemia (PaO2 < 55 mmHg or SpO2 < 88%) where it improves oxygen delivery, reduces oxidative stress, and enhances exercise tolerance while lowering fatigue and hospitalization risk [128]. These benefits are, however, restricted to hypoxemic individuals; in non-hypoxemic patients, oxygen supplementation does not improve outcomes and may even discourage physical activity. Careful patient selection is therefore essential to optimize its impact [129].

7.3. Cognitive, Psychological, and Social Support

The psychosocial dimensions of frailty are equally important, as cognitive decline, depression, and social isolation are common in COPD and substantially impair functional outcomes and adherence to therapy [130]. Interventions such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, peer-support groups, and occupational therapy have been shown to enhance motivation, improve coping, and reduce depressive symptoms. Social support also facilitates smoking cessation, which remains a corner-stone intervention by reducing oxidative damage, systemic inflammation, and skeletal muscle loss [16]. However, stigma, limited access to services, and high relapse rates pose challenges, under-scoring the need for structured, multidisciplinary support programs.

7.4. Fall Prevention and Functional Independence Training

Frailty substantially increases the risk of falls in COPD due to impaired balance, muscle weak-ness, and reduced proprioception. Fall prevention programs integrating balance and gait training, environmental modifications, and dual-task exercises are effective in mitigating this risk [13]. Functional independence training further promotes autonomy, reduces hospitalization, and enhances overall quality of life, with the best outcomes observed when delivered as part of multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation [131].

8. Integrated Multimodal Approaches

The multifactorial pathophysiology of sarcopenia and frailty in COPD necessitates integrated interventions combining exercise, nutritional optimization, pharmacologic support, and psycho-social care [132,133,134]. Multimodal strategies yield superior improvements in muscle function, hospitalization rates, and quality of life compared to isolated approaches [135,136].

8.1. Synergistic Effects of Combined Interventions

Exercise and nutritional support exert synergistic anabolic effects, particularly in the catabolic –inflammatory context of COPD [137]. Resistance training enhances muscle protein synthesis via mechanotransduction, further potentiated by adequate protein or leucine-enriched supplementation [76]. Adjunctive anabolic agents, such as testosterone, may augment gains in muscle mass and strength, though benefits must be balanced against potential risks [98].

8.2. Real-World Programs and Pilot Studies

Pilot studies and real-world programs integrating multimodal interventions have demonstrated clinically meaningful benefits in patients with COPD. Multicomponent strategies combining structured exercise training, high-protein nutritional supplementation, and individualized counseling have been associated with improvements in gait speed, handgrip strength, and overall physical performance, as assessed by validated functional indices such as the Short Physical Performance Battery [78]. In addition, integrated care models incorporating pulmonary rehabilitation, optimized pharmacotherapy, and structured home-based resistance training programs have been shown to reduce hospital readmissions and improve functional independence over medium-term follow-up. Telehealth-supported rehabilitation approaches, combining remote exercise supervision, nutritional monitoring, and psychosocial support, have achieved outcomes comparable to conventional center-based programs, while improving accessibility, adherence, and continuity of care in real-world clinical settings [138].

8.3. Models of Care and Delivery Pathways

Optimal multimodal delivery relies on coordinated, interdisciplinary frameworks. Pulmonary rehabilitation centers function as integration hubs, supported by physiotherapists, dietitians, psychologists, and respiratory specialists. Community-based and telehealth models enhance accessibility for frail or remote patients, allowing personalized, data-driven adjustments and ensuring adherence, safety, and continuity of care in both routine and post-pandemic contexts [139,140].

9. Discussion

Sarcopenia and frailty represent two interconnected geriatric syndromes that substantially contribute to disease burden, disability, and adverse outcomes in patients with COPD. Although often unrecognized in clinical practice, these conditions are now established as major contributors to disability, hospitalizations, and mortality in COPD populations. Beyond their shared clinical consequences, sarcopenia and frailty represent distinct but overlapping constructs: sarcopenia primarily reflects progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength, whereas frailty encompasses a multidimensional vulnerability state involving physical, cognitive, psychological, and social domains. Their frequent coexistence in COPD underscores the need for integrated assessment frameworks and targeted interventions addressing both muscular and systemic components of vulnerability [25].
Current evidence highlights a range of interventions—including exercise, nutritional support, pharmacologic therapies, and non-pharmacologic adjuncts—with varying degrees of efficacy. Among these, exercise-based therapies, particularly resistance and multicomponent training, demonstrate the most consistent benefits in improving muscle mass, strength, and functional capacity. Importantly, multimodal rehabilitation programs combining resistance, endurance, and balance training appear to exert synergistic effects, improving not only physical performance but also frailty indices and overall resilience, particularly when delivered within structured pulmonary rehabilitation frameworks [141,142].
However, feasibility may be limited in advanced COPD due to dyspnea, fatigue, or comorbidities, necessitating alternative approaches such as neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Nutritional interventions, including adequate protein intake (1.2–2.0 g/kg/day) and leucine-enriched or omega-3-supplemented formulations, show promise in enhancing anabolic responses, particularly when combined with exercise. Emerging evidence further suggests that individualized nutritional strategies guided by baseline nutritional status, inflammatory burden, and metabolic phenotype may optimize therapeutic responses, highlighting the importance of precision-based nutritional care [33].
Yet their implementation is often hindered by reduced appetite, gastrointestinal intolerance, or socioeconomic barriers. Pharmacologic agents such as testosterone, selective androgen receptor modulators, and myostatin inhibitors remain investigational, with inconsistent translation of muscle mass gains into functional improvements. This discrepancy emphasizes that pharmacologically induced hypertrophy alone is insufficient and must be integrated with functional training to achieve clinically meaningful outcomes [143].
Additionally, non-pharmacologic strategies—including long-term oxygen therapy, psychosocial support, and fall prevention—address broader aspects of frailty, reinforcing the need for a holistic, biopsychosocial approach. Cognitive, emotional, and social determinants substantially influence adherence, functional recovery, and long-term prognosis, underscoring the necessity of multidisciplinary care models extending beyond conventional respiratory management [144,145].
Despite these advances, key limitations persist, including diagnostic heterogeneity, short intervention durations, and underrepresentation of high-risk subgroups. Moving forward, a multi-modal, patient-centered model—incorporating risk stratification, tiered interventions, and regular reassessment—is essential [146]. Future research should prioritize longitudinal studies, biomarker-guided therapies, and innovative delivery models (e.g., tele-rehabilitation, wearable sensors) to optimize personalized care. Furthermore, the integration of digital health tools and artificial intelligence–driven monitoring platforms may facilitate early detection of functional decline and dynamic adjustment of interventions, potentially improving long-term adherence and clinical outcomes. Ultimately, addressing sarcopenia and frailty in COPD requires integrated, multidisciplinary strategies to improve resilience and preserve autonomy in this vulnerable population.

10. Clinical Implications and Future Research Priorities

Based on the integrated evaluation of current evidence, several clinically relevant implications emerge. First, systematic screening for sarcopenia and frailty should be incorporated into routine COPD care, particularly in patients with advanced disease, frequent exacerbations, reduced exercise tolerance, or unintentional weight loss. Early identification may facilitate timely intervention, prevent irreversible functional decline, and improve long-term outcomes.
Second, multimodal, individualized intervention strategies should be prioritized, integrating structured exercise training, targeted nutritional support, and selected pharmacological or adjunctive therapies. Tailoring interventions according to disease severity, functional status, comorbidity burden, and patient preferences enables a precision rehabilitation approach, maximizing adherence and clinical benefit.
Future research should prioritize:
-
the development and validation of biomarker-guided risk stratification tools for early detection and monitoring of sarcopenia and frailty in COPD;
-
long-term, adequately powered randomized controlled trials evaluating combined exercise–nutrition–pharmacological interventions with clinically meaningful endpoints;
-
implementation and health-services research addressing feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and scalability in real-world clinical settings; and
-
digital health and tele-rehabilitation strategies to improve accessibility, long-term adherence, and continuity of care, particularly in underserved populations.

11. Conclusions

Sarcopenia and frailty are key, yet frequently under-recognized determinants of poor outcomes in COPD, strongly associated with functional decline, reduced quality of life, hospitalizations, and mortality. Their complex pathophysiology requires integrated, multimodal, and individualized management strategies combining structured exercise, targeted nutrition, and selected adjunctive therapies. Coordinated interventions provide superior clinical benefits, including improved muscle function, enhanced physical performance, and reduced healthcare utilization. Integrating systematic screening and personalized rehabilitation strategies into routine COPD care may therefore represent a crucial opportunity to preserve functional independence and improve long-term patient-centered outcomes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.N., M.F., G.S., T.K., Z.R., E.P., L.P., R.B., B.S., V.M. and J.T.V.; methodology, S.N., M.F., G.S., T.K., Z.R., E.P., L.P., R.B., B.S., V.M. and J.T.V.; data curation, S.N., M.F., G.S., T.K., Z.R., E.P., L.P., R.B., B.S., V.M. and J.T.V.; formal analysis, S.N., M.F., G.S., T.K., Z.R., E.P., L.P., R.B., B.S., V.M. and J.T.V.; writing—original draft preparation, S.N., M.F., G.S., T.K., Z.R., E.P., L.P., R.B., B.S., V.M. and J.T.V.; writing—review and editing, S.N., M.F., G.S., T.K., Z.R., E.P., L.P., R.B., B.S., V.M. and J.T.V.; supervision, V.M. and J.T.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

M.F. was supported by the Cooperative Translational Research Program (KTKP) of the Faculty of Medicine of Semmelweis University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

ActRIIB, Activin Type II Receptor; AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase; Bi-PAP, bilevel positive airway pressure; BLVR, bronchoscopic lung volume reduction; CGA, comprehensive geriatric assessment; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; EAA, essential amino acids; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; GH, growth hormone; HMB, β-hydroxy β-methylbutyrate; ICS, inhaled corticosteroid; LABA, long-acting β2-agonist; LAMA, long-acting muscarinic antagonist; LTOT, long-term oxygen therapy; LVRS, lung volume reduction surgery; MPS, muscle protein synthesis; NETT, National Emphysema Treatment Trial; NIV, non-invasive ventilation; NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation; ONS, oral nutritional supplements; SPPB, short physical performance battery; PR, pulmonary rehabilitation; PUFAs, polyunsaturated fatty acids; SARMs, selective androgen receptor modulators; 6MWT, six-minute walk test; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α.

References

  1. Barnes, P.J. Inflammatory mechanisms in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016, 138, 16–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pauwels, R.A.; Buist, A.S.; Ma, P.; Jenkins, C.R.; Hurd, S.S. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and World Health Organization Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD): Executive summary. Respir. Care 2001, 46, 798–825. [Google Scholar]
  3. Barnes, P.J.; Celli, B.R. Systemic manifestations and comorbidities of COPD. Eur. Respir. J. 2009, 33, 1165–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Spruit, M.A.; Singh, S.J.; Garvey, C.; ZuWallack, R.; Nici, L.; Rochester, C.; Hill, K.; Holland, A.E.; Lareau, S.C.; Man, W.D.; et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: Key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2013, 188, e13–e64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kim, J.W.; Kim, R.; Choi, H.; Lee, S.J.; Bae, G.U. Understanding of sarcopenia: From definition to therapeutic strategies. Arch. Pharmacal Res. 2021, 44, 876–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cruz-Jentoft, A.J.; Bahat, G.; Bauer, J.; Boirie, Y.; Bruyère, O.; Cederholm, T.; Cooper, C.; Landi, F.; Rolland, Y.; Sayer, A.A.; et al. Sarcopenia: Revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 2019, 48, 16–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Spexoto, M.C.B.; Ramírez, P.C.; de Oliveira Máximo, R.; Steptoe, A.; De Oliveira, C.; Alexandre, T.d.S. European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2010 (EWGSOP1) and 2019 (EWGSOP2) criteria or slowness: Which is the best predictor of mortality risk in older adults? Age Ageing 2022, 51, afac164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Buckinx, F.; Landi, F.; Cesari, M.; Fielding, R.A.; Visser, M.; Engelke, K.; Maggi, S.; Dennison, E.; Al-Daghri, N.M.; Allepaerts, S.; et al. Pitfalls in the measurement of muscle mass: A need for a reference standard. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2018, 9, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Avers, D. The older adult who is frail. In Guccione’s Geriatric Physical Therapy E-Book; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; p. 283. [Google Scholar]
  10. Fried, L.P.; Tangen, C.M.; Walston, J.; Newman, A.B.; Hirsch, C.; Gottdiener, J.; Seeman, T.; Tracy, R.; Kop, W.J.; Burke, G.; et al. Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2001, 56, M146–M157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schmidle, S. Wearable-Based Analysis of Everyday Life Performances of Individuals with Frailty in Advanced Age. Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universität München, Munchen, Germany, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ruiz, J.G.; Espinoza, S. The Frailty Phenotype. Frailty: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Assessment, Management, and Prevention; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2024; pp. 3–9. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kennedy, C.C.; Novotny, P.J.; LeBrasseur, N.K.; Wise, R.A.; Sciurba, F.C.; Benzo, R.P. Frailty and clinical outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2019, 16, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fekete, M.; Fazekas-Pongor, V.; Balazs, P.; Tarantini, S.; Nemeth, A.N.; Varga, J.T. Role of new digital technologies and telemedicine in pulmonary rehabilitation: Smart devices in the treatment of chronic respiratory diseases. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 2021, 133, 1201–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wagner, K. Men with COPD and sarcopenia at high risk for osteopenia. Chest 2017, 2016, 6. [Google Scholar]
  16. Azhimamatova, R.; Salieva, R.S.; Zalova, T.B.; Karimova, K.; Karimova, D.S.; Dyikanova, S.A.; Kalmatov, R.; Tynaliev, U.M. Frailty in COPD: Clinical Impact, Diagnosis, Biomarkers, and Management Strategies. Int. J. Chronic Obstr. Pulm. Dis. 2025, 20, 2445–2458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kim, S.H.; Shin, M.J.; Shin, Y.B.; Kim, K.U. Sarcopenia associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J. Bone Metab. 2019, 26, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Albano, G.D.; Gagliardo, R.P.; Montalbano, A.M.; Profita, M. Overview of the mechanisms of oxidative stress: Impact in inflammation of the airway diseases. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 2237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Casaburi, R.; Merrill, D.D.; Harding, G.; Leidy, N.K.; Rossiter, H.B.; Tal-Singer, R.; Hamilton, A.; CBQC Constant Work Rate Exercise Working Group. A Conceptual Framework for Use of Increased Endurance Time During Constant Work Rate Cycle Ergometry as a Patient-Focused Meaningful Outcome in COPD Clinical Trials. Chronic Obs. Pulm. Dis. 2022, 9, 252–265. [Google Scholar]
  20. Barreiro, E.; de la Puente, B.; Minguella, J.; Corominas, J.M.; Serrano, S.; Hussain, S.N.; Gea, J. Oxidative stress and respiratory muscle dysfunction in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2005, 171, 1116–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Laghi, F.; Adiguzel, N.; Tobin, M. Endocrinological derangements in COPD. Eur. Respir. J. 2009, 34, 975–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dal Negro, R.W.; Testa, A.; Aquilani, R.; Tognella, S.; Pasini, E.; Barbieri, A.; Boschi, F. Essential amino acid supplementation in patients with severe COPD: A step towards home rehabilitation. Monaldi Arch. Chest Dis. 2012, 77, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gea, J.; Estirado, C.; Barreiro, E. Alterations in nutritional status and body composition in COPD patients. BRN Rev. 2017, 3, 56–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Burdet, L.; de Muralt, B.; Schutz, Y.; Pichard, C.; Fitting, J.W. Administration of growth hormone to underweight patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A prospective, randomized, controlled study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1997, 156, 1800–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bone, A.E.; Hepgul, N.; Kon, S.; Maddocks, M. Sarcopenia and frailty in chronic respiratory disease: Lessons from gerontology. Chronic Respir. Dis. 2017, 14, 85–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. McAuley, H.J.C. Unravelling the Nature of Physical Frailty and Sarcopenia in Acute and Chronic Respiratory Disease. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  27. Maltais, F.; Decramer, M.; Casaburi, R.; Barreiro, E.; Burelle, Y.; Debigaré, R.; Dekhuijzen, P.N.; Franssen, F.; Gayan-Ramirez, G.; Gea, J.; et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: Update on limb muscle dysfunction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2014, 189, e15–e62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Shibi Anilkumar, A.; Veerabathiran, R. Respiratory Health. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Disability; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2026; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  29. Fekete, M.; Csípő, T.; Fazekas-Pongor, V.; Fehér, Á.; Szarvas, Z.; Kaposvári, C.; Horváth, K.; Lehoczki, A.; Tarantini, S.; Varga, J.T. The Effectiveness of Supplementation with Key Vitamins, Minerals, Antioxidants and Specific Nutritional Supplements in COPD―A Review. Nutrients 2023, 15, 2741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Fekete, M.; Fazekas-Pongor, V.; Balazs, P.; Tarantini, S.; Szollosi, G.; Pako, J.; Nemeth, A.N.; Varga, J.T. Effect of malnutrition and body composition on the quality of life of COPD patients. Physiol. Int. 2021, 108, 238–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fekete, M.; Lehoczki, A.; Csípő, T.; Fazekas-Pongor, V.; Szappanos, Á.; Major, D.; Mózes, N.; Dósa, N.; Varga, J.T. The Role of Trace Elements in COPD: Pathogenetic Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential of Zinc, Iron, Magnesium, Selenium, Manganese, Copper, and Calcium. Nutrients 2024, 16, 4118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bourne, S.; DeVos, R.; North, M.; Chauhan, A.; Green, B.; Brown, T.; Cornelius, V.; Wilkinson, T. Online versus face-to-face pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2017, 7, e014580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Collins, P.F.; Yang, I.A.; Chang, Y.C.; Vaughan, A. Nutritional support in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): An evidence update. J. Thorac. Dis. 2019, 11, S2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Holland, A.E.; Mahal, A.; Hill, C.J.; Lee, A.L.; Burge, A.T.; Cox, N.S.; Moore, R.; Nicolson, C.; O’Halloran, P.; Lahham, A.; et al. Home-based rehabilitation for COPD using minimal resources: A randomised, controlled equivalence trial. Thorax 2017, 72, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vivodtzev, I.; Debigaré, R.; Gagnon, P.; Mainguy, V.; Saey, D.; Dubé, A.; Paré, M.È.; Bélanger, M.; Maltais, F. Functional and muscular effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in patients with severe COPD: A randomized clinical trial. Chest 2012, 141, 716–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. van Bakel, S.I.; Gosker, H.R.; Langen, R.C.; Schols, A.M. Towards personalized management of sarcopenia in COPD. Int. J. Chronic Obstr. Pulm. Dis. 2021, 16, 25–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Joshi, P.R. Pulmonary diseases in older patients: Understanding and addressing the challenges. Geriatrics 2024, 9, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Prokopidis, K.; Hargreaves, J.; Ispoglou, T. Sarcopenia and Frailty: A Common Thread Across Multiple Comorbidities. In Frailty: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Assessment, Management, and Prevention; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2024; pp. 39–43. [Google Scholar]
  39. Chen, L.-K. Sarcopenia in the era of precision health: Toward personalized interventions for healthy longevity. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2024, 87, 980–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Abidi, Y.; Kovats, Z.; Bohacs, A.; Fekete, M.; Naas, S.; Madurka, I.; Torok, K.; Bogyo, L.; Varga, J.T. Lung transplant rehabilitation—A review. Life 2023, 13, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Fekete, M.; Kerti, M.; Fazekas-Pongor, V.; Balazs, P.; Csizmadia, Z.; Nemeth, A.N.; Tarantini, S.; Varga, J. Effect of interval training with non-invasive ventilation in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease—A prospective cohort study with matched control group. Ann. Palliat. Med. 2021, 10, 5289–5298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Rochester, C.L. Barriers to pulmonary rehabilitation. Respir. Care 2024, 69, 713–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Flor-Rufino, C.; Barrachina-Igual, J.; Pérez-Ros, P.; Pablos-Monzó, A.; Martínez-Arnau, F.M. Resistance training of peripheral muscles benefits respiratory parameters in older women with sarcopenia: Randomized controlled trial. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2023, 104, 104799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pancera, S. A Novel Quantitative Technological Approach to Muscle and Exercise Dysfunction in the Clinical Rehabilitation Practice of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Ph.D. Thesis, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Brescia, Italy, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  45. O’Shea, S.D.; Taylor, N.F.; Paratz, J.D. Progressive resistance exercise improves muscle strength and may improve elements of performance of daily activities for people with COPD: A systematic review. Chest 2009, 136, 1269–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Scherer, T.A.; Spengler, C.M.; Owassapian, D.; Imhof, E.; Boutellier, U. Respiratory muscle endurance training in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Impact on exercise capacity, dyspnea, and quality of life. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2000, 162, 1709–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vogiatzis, I.; Nanas, S.; Roussos, C. Interval training as an alternative modality to continuous exercise in patients with COPD. Eur. Respir. J. 2002, 20, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kortianou, E.A.; Nasis, I.G.; Spetsioti, S.T.; Daskalakis, A.M.; Vogiatzis, I. Effectiveness of Interval Exercise Training in Patients with COPD. Cardiopulm. Phys. Ther. J. 2010, 21, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Ma, K.; Huang, F.; Qiao, R.; Miao, L. Pathogenesis of sarcopenia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Front. Physiol. 2022, 13, 850964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Robinson, S.; Cooper, C.; Aihie Sayer, A. Nutrition and sarcopenia: A review of the evidence and implications for preventive strategies. J. Aging Res. 2012, 2012, 510801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hill, N.S. Pulmonary rehabilitation. Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2006, 3, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Horton, E.J.; Mitchell, K.E.; Johnson-Warrington, V.; Apps, L.D.; Sewell, L.; Morgan, M.; Taylor, R.S.; Singh, S.J. Comparison of a structured home-based rehabilitation programme with conventional supervised pulmonary rehabilitation: A randomised non-inferiority trial. Thorax 2018, 73, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Velez, M.; Lugo-Agudelo, L.H.; Patiño Lugo, D.F.; Glenton, C.; Posada, A.M.; Mesa Franco, L.F.; Negrini, S.; Kiekens, C.; Spir Brunal, M.A.; Roberg, A.B.; et al. Factors that influence the provision of home-based rehabilitation services for people needing rehabilitation: A qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2023, 2, Cd014823. [Google Scholar]
  54. Nápolis, L.M.; Dal Corso, S.; Neder, J.A.; Malaguti, C.; Gimenes, A.C.O.; Nery, L.E. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves exercise tolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with better preserved fat-free mass. Clinics 2011, 66, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Coquart, J.B.; Grosbois, J.-M.; Olivier, C.; Bart, F.; Castres, I.; Wallaert, B. Home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves exercise tolerance and health-related quality of life in patients with COPD. Int. J. Chronic Obstr. Pulm. Dis. 2016, 11, 1189–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Rehder-Santos, P.; Abreu, R.M.; Signini, É.D.F.; da Silva, C.D.; Sakaguchi, C.A.; Dato, C.C.; Catai, A.M. Moderate-and High-Intensity Inspiratory Muscle Training Equally Improves Inspiratory Muscle Strength and Endurance—A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2021, 16, 1111–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nici, L. Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Mechanisms of Functional Loss and Benefits of Exercise. Respir. Care 2024, 69, 640–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bernard, S.; Whittom, F.; Leblanc, P.; Jobin, J.; Belleau, R.; Bérubé, C.; Carrier, G.; Maltais, F. Aerobic and strength training in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1999, 159, 896–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Spruit, M.A.; Gosselink, R.; Troosters, T.; De Paepe, K.; Decramer, M. Resistance versus endurance training in patients with COPD and peripheral muscle weakness. Eur. Respir. J. 2002, 19, 1072–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Probst, V.S.; Kovelis, D.; Hernandes, N.A.; Camillo, C.A.; Cavalheri, V.; Pitta, F. Effects of 2 exercise training programs on physical activity in daily life in patients with COPD. Respir. Care 2011, 56, 1799–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Maltais, F.; LeBlanc, P.; Jobin, J.; Bérubé, C.; Bruneau, J.; Carrier, L.; Breton, M.J.; Falardeau, G.; Belleau, R. Intensity of training and physiologic adaptation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1997, 155, 555–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Puhan, M.A.; Büsching, G.; Schünemann, H.J.; VanOort, E.; Zaugg, C.; Frey, M. Interval versus continuous high-intensity exercise in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 2006, 145, 816–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zwerink, M.; Brusse-Keizer, M.; van der Valk, P.D.; Zielhuis, G.A.; Monninkhof, E.M.; van der Palen, J.; Frith, P.A.; Effing, T. Self-management for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014, 2014, Cd002990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Maddocks, M.; Nolan, C.M.; Man, W.D.; Polkey, M.I.; Hart, N.; Gao, W.; Rafferty, G.F.; Moxham, J.; Higginson, I.J. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation to improve exercise capacity in patients with severe COPD: A randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Respir. Med. 2016, 4, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Gloeckl, R.; Schneeberger, T.; Jarosch, I.; Kenn, K. Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Exercise Training in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2018, 115, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. McCarthy, B.; Casey, D.; Devane, D.; Murphy, K.; Murphy, E.; Lacasse, Y. Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015, 2015, Cd003793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Maltais, F.; Bourbeau, J.; Shapiro, S.; Lacasse, Y.; Perrault, H.; Baltzan, M.; Hernandez, P.; Rouleau, M.; Julien, M.; Parenteau, S.; et al. Effects of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 2008, 149, 869–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cox, N.S.; Dal Corso, S.; Hansen, H.; McDonald, C.F.; Hill, C.J.; Zanaboni, P.; Alison, J.A.; O’Halloran, P.; Macdonald, H.; Holland, A.E. Telerehabilitation for chronic respiratory disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2021, 1, Cd013040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Neder, J.A.; Sword, D.; Ward, S.A.; Mackay, E.; Cochrane, L.M.; Clark, C.J. Home based neuromuscular electrical stimulation as a new rehabilitative strategy for severely disabled patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Thorax 2002, 57, 333–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Vivodtzev, I.; Pépin, J.L.; Vottero, G.; Mayer, V.; Porsin, B.; Lévy, P.; Wuyam, B. Improvement in quadriceps strength and dyspnea in daily tasks after 1 month of electrical stimulation in severely deconditioned and malnourished COPD. Chest 2006, 129, 1540–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sillen, M.J.; Janssen, P.P.; Akkermans, M.A.; Wouters, E.F.; Spruit, M.A. The metabolic response during resistance training and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in patients with COPD, a pilot study. Respir. Med. 2008, 102, 786–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  72. Zambom-Ferraresi, F.; Cebollero, P.; Gorostiaga, E.M.; Hernández, M.; Hueto, J.; Cascante, J.; Rezusta, L.; Val, L.; Anton, M.M. Effects of Combined Resistance and Endurance Training Versus Resistance Training Alone on Strength, Exercise Capacity, and Quality of Life in Patients With COPD. J. Cardiopulm. Rehabil. Prev. 2015, 35, 446–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Broekhuizen, R.; Creutzberg, E.C.; Weling-Scheepers, C.A.; Wouters, E.F.; Schols, A.M. Optimizing oral nutritional drink supplementation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Br. J. Nutr. 2005, 93, 965–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ferreira, I.M.; Brooks, D.; White, J.; Goldstein, R. Nutritional supplementation for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012, 12, Cd000998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Kaluźniak-Szymanowska, A.; Krzymińska-Siemaszko, R.; Deskur-Śmielecka, E.; Lewandowicz, M.; Kaczmarek, B.; Wieczorowska-Tobis, K. Malnutrition, Sarcopenia, and Malnutrition-Sarcopenia Syndrome in Older Adults with COPD. Nutrients 2021, 14, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Huhn, A.; Diel, P. Impact of Protein Intake on Training Response in Chronic Lung Disease. Nutrients 2025, 18, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Steiner, M.C.; Barton, R.L.; Singh, S.J.; Morgan, M.D. Nutritional enhancement of exercise performance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomised controlled trial. Thorax 2003, 58, 745–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Brauwers, B.; Machado, F.V.; Beijers, R.J.; Spruit, M.A.; Franssen, F.M. Combined exercise training and nutritional interventions or pharmacological treatments to improve exercise capacity and body composition in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A narrative review. Nutrients 2023, 15, 5136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hugli, O.; Fitting, J. Alterations in metabolism and body composition in chronic respiratory diseases. Eur. Respir. Monograph 2003, 8, 11–22. [Google Scholar]
  80. Mahmoudifar, K.; Homayounfar, N.; Rezaie, M. Review of Oral Nutritional Supplements in Malnutrition Management for Unlocking Nutritional Potential: A Review. J. Nutr. Fasting Health 2025, 13, 86–99. [Google Scholar]
  81. Hornikx, M.; Van Remoortel, H.; Lehouck, A.; Mathieu, C.; Maes, K.; Gayan-Ramirez, G.; Decramer, M.; Troosters, T.; Janssens, W. Vitamin D supplementation during rehabilitation in COPD: A secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Respir. Res. 2012, 13, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Bjerk, S.M.; Edgington, B.D.; Rector, T.S.; Kunisaki, K.M. Supplemental vitamin D and physical performance in COPD: A pilot randomized trial. Int. J. Chron. Obs. Pulmon. Dis. 2013, 8, 97–104. [Google Scholar]
  83. Gouzi, F.; Maury, J.; Héraud, N.; Molinari, N.; Bertet, H.; Ayoub, B.; Blaquière, M.; Bughin, F.; De Rigal, P.; Poulain, M.; et al. Additional Effects of Nutritional Antioxidant Supplementation on Peripheral Muscle during Pulmonary Rehabilitation in COPD Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 5496346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Weekes, C.E.; Emery, P.W.; Elia, M. Dietary counselling and food fortification in stable COPD: A randomised trial. Thorax 2009, 64, 326–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kuzuya, M.; Kanno, Y.; Arai, H.; Nishiguchi, S.; Iijima, K.; Umegaki, H.; Satake, S.; Sato, S.; Shinmura, K.; Sugimoto, K.; et al. Nutritional Management Guidelines for Sarcopenia and Frailty 2025. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 2025, 25, 5–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Fekete, M.; Csípő, T.; Fazekas-Pongor, V.; Bálint, M.; Csizmadia, Z.; Tarantini, S.; Varga, J.T. The possible role of food and diet in the quality of life in patients with COPD—A state-of-the-art review. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Fekete, M.; Szarvas, Z.; Fazekas-Pongor, V.; Lehoczki, A.; Tarantini, S.; Varga, J.T. Effects of omega-3 supplementation on quality of life, nutritional status, inflammatory parameters, lipid profile, exercise tolerance and inhaled medications in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann. Palliat. Med. 2022, 11, 2819–2829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Fekete, M.; Pongor, V.; Fehér, Á.; Veresné Bálint, M.; Varga, J.T.; Horváth, I. Relationship of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and nutritional status―Clinical observations. Orv. Hetil. 2019, 160, 908–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Engelen, M.; Jonker, R.; Sulaiman, H.; Fisk, H.L.; Calder, P.C.; Deutz, N.E.P. ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation improves postabsorptive and prandial protein metabolism in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized clinical trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2022, 116, 686–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Fekete, M.; Szőllősi, G.; Németh, A.N.; Varga, J.T. Clinical value of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Orvosi Hetil. 2021, 162, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Billingsley, H.E.; Rodriguez-Miguelez, P.; Del Buono, M.G.; Abbate, A.; Lavie, C.J.; Carbone, S. Lifestyle interventions with a focus on nutritional strategies to increase cardiorespiratory fitness in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, obesity, sarcopenia, and frailty. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Heo, J. Pathogenesis and Nutritional Intervention of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-Associated Frailty. Sci. Insights 2022, 41, 761–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Nguyen, D.Q.; Tran, H.T.T.; Vu, N.T.; Pham, T.T.; Ha, T.T.; Pham, N.M.T.; Chu, D.H.; Dao, T.T.; Bui, H.Q.; Vu, T.V.; et al. Effectiveness of individualized nutritional support in improving clinical symptoms of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A pre-post intervention study. J. Thorac. Dis. 2025, 17, 11200–11211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Fu, Y.; Chapman, E.J.; Boland, A.C.; Bennett, M.I. Evidence-based management approaches for patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): A practice review. Palliat. Med. 2022, 36, 770–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wüst, R.C.; Degens, H. Factors contributing to muscle wasting and dysfunction in COPD patients. Int. J. Chron. Obs. Pulmon. Dis. 2007, 2, 289–300. [Google Scholar]
  96. Gea, J.; Orozco-Levi, M.; Pascual-Guàrdia, S.; Casadevall, C.; Enríquez-Rodríguez, C.J.; Camps-Ubach, R.; Barreiro, E. Biological Mechanisms Involved in Muscle Dysfunction in COPD: An Integrative Damage-Regeneration-Remodeling Framework. Cells 2025, 14, 1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Barreiro, E.; Jaitovich, A. Muscle atrophy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Molecular basis and potential therapeutic targets. J. Thorac. Dis. 2018, 10, S1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Casaburi, R.; Bhasin, S.; Cosentino, L.; Porszasz, J.; Somfay, A.; Lewis, M.I.; Fournier, M.; Storer, T.W. Effects of testosterone and resistance training in men with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2004, 170, 870–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zeng, S.; Zhang, Y.; Li, S.; Li, Z.; Li, P.; Xie, J.; Zhang, J.; Xie, L.; Yang, Y. From metabolic alterations to chronic inflammation: Mechanisms and immunoregulation of metabolic reprogramming in COPD. Front. Immunol. 2025, 16, 1698832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Bakakos, A.; Sotiropoulou, Z.; Anagnostopoulos, N.; Vontetsianos, A.; Cholidou, K.; Papaioannou, A.I.; Bartziokas, K. Anti-inflammatory agents for the management of COPD―Quo Vadis? Respir. Med. 2025, 248, 108396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Wang, Y.; An, H.; Liu, T.; Qin, C.; Sesaki, H.; Guo, S.; Radovick, S.; Hussain, M.; Maheshwari, A.; Wondisford, F.E.; et al. Metformin Improves Mitochondrial Respiratory Activity through Activation of AMPK. Cell Rep. 2019, 29, 1511–1523.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Chavda, V.P.; Bezbaruah, R.; Ahmed, N.; Alom, S.; Bhattacharjee, B.; Nalla, L.V.; Rynjah, D.; Gadanec, L.K.; Apostolopoulos, V. Proinflammatory cytokines in chronic respiratory diseases and their management. Cells 2025, 14, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Tan, Z.; Zhao, M.; Li, J.; Li, S.; Zhu, S.; Yao, X.; Gao, X.; Yang, S. Myostatin is involved in skeletal muscle dysfunction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease via Drp-1 mediated abnormal mitochondrial division. Ann. Transl. Med. 2022, 10, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Kanbay, M.; Siriopol, D.; Copur, S.; Hasbal, N.B.; Güldan, M.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Garfias-Veitl, T.; von Haehling, S. Effect of Bimagrumab on body composition: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2024, 36, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Rooks, D.; Swan, T.; Goswami, B.; Filosa, L.A.; Bunte, O.; Panchaud, N.; Coleman, L.A.; Miller, R.R.; Garcia Garayoa, E.; Praestgaard, J.; et al. Bimagrumab vs optimized standard of care for treatment of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e2020836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Fuso, L.; Mores, N.; Valente, S.; Malerba, M.; Montuschi, P. Long-acting beta-agonists and their association with inhaled corticosteroids in COPD. Curr. Med. Chem. 2013, 20, 1477–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Calverley, P.M.; Anderson, J.A.; Celli, B.; Ferguson, G.T.; Jenkins, C.; Jones, P.W.; Yates, J.C.; Vestbo, J.; TORCH Investigators. Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate and survival in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 356, 775–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Fishman, A.; Martinez, F.; Naunheim, K.; Piantadosi, S.; Wise, R.; Ries, A.; Weinmann, G.; Wood, D.E.; National Emphysema Treatment Trial Research Group. A randomized trial comparing lung-volume–reduction surgery with medical therapy for severe emphysema. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 348, 2059–2073. [Google Scholar]
  109. McEvoy, R.D.; Pierce, R.J.; Hillman, D.; Esterman, A.; Ellis, E.; Catcheside, P.G.; O’Donoghue, F.J.; Barnes, D.J.; Grunstein, R.R.; Australian Trial of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Chronic Airflow Limitation (AVCAL) Study Group. Nocturnal non-invasive nasal ventilation in stable hypercapnic COPD: A randomised controlled trial. Thorax 2009, 64, 561–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Nocturnal Oxygen Therapy Trial Group. Continuous or nocturnal oxygen therapy in hypoxemic chronic obstructive lung disease: A clinical trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 1980, 93, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Struik, F.M.; Sprooten, R.T.; Kerstjens, H.; Bladder, G.; Zijnen, M.; Asin, J.; Cobben, N.A.; Vonk, J.M.; Wijkstra, P.J. Nocturnal non-invasive ventilation in COPD patients with prolonged hypercapnia after ventilatory support for acute respiratory failure: A randomised, controlled, parallel-group study. Thorax 2014, 69, 826–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Svartberg, J.; Aasebø, U.; Hjalmarsen, A.; Sundsfjord, J.; Jorde, R. Testosterone treatment improves body composition and sexual function in men with COPD, in a 6-month randomized controlled trial. Respir. Med. 2004, 98, 906–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Dalton, J.T.; Barnette, K.G.; Bohl, C.E.; Hancock, M.L.; Rodriguez, D.; Dodson, S.T.; Morton, R.A.; Steiner, M.S. The selective androgen receptor modulator GTx-024 (enobosarm) improves lean body mass and physical function in healthy elderly men and postmenopausal women: Results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2011, 2, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Frost, F. Mechanism of Statin-Associated Mortality Reduction in COPD: Response. Chest 2007, 132, 1409–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Aaron, S.D.; Vandemheen, K.L.; Maltais, F.; Field, S.K.; Sin, D.D.; Bourbeau, J.; Marciniuk, D.D.; FitzGerald, J.M.; Nair, P.; Mallick, R. TNFα antagonists for acute exacerbations of COPD: A randomised double-blind controlled trial. Thorax 2013, 68, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Polkey, M.I.; Praestgaard, J.; Berwick, A.; Franssen, F.M.E.; Singh, D.; Steiner, M.C.; Casaburi, R.; Tillmann, H.C.; Lach-Trifilieff, E.; Roubenoff, R.; et al. Activin Type II Receptor Blockade for Treatment of Muscle Depletion in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A Randomized Trial. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2019, 199, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Stewart Coats, A.J.; Ho, G.F.; Prabhash, K.; von Haehling, S.; Tilson, J.; Brown, R.; Beadle, J.; Anker, S.D.; for and on behalf of the ACT-ONE study group. Espindolol for the treatment and prevention of cachexia in patients with stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer or colorectal cancer: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international multicentre phase II study (the ACT-ONE trial). J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2016, 7, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  118. Gilson, H.; Schakman, O.; Kalista, S.; Lause, P.; Tsuchida, K.; Thissen, J.P. Follistatin induces muscle hypertrophy through satellite cell proliferation and inhibition of both myostatin and activin. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 297, E157–E164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. O’Donnell, D.E.; Voduc, N.; Fitzpatrick, M.; Webb, K.A. Effect of salmeterol on the ventilatory response to exercise in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur. Respir. J. 2004, 24, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Brusasco, V.; Hodder, R.; Miravitlles, M.; Korducki, L.; Towse, L.; Kesten, S. Health outcomes following treatment for six months with once daily tiotropium compared with twice daily salmeterol in patients with COPD. Thorax 2003, 58, 399–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Clini, E.; Sturani, C.; Rossi, A.; Viaggi, S.; Corrado, A.; Donner, C.F.; Ambrosino, N.; Rehabilitation and Chronic Care Study Group; Italian Association of Hospital Pulmonologists (AIPO). The Italian multicentre study on noninvasive ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Eur. Respir. J. 2002, 20, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. de Godoy, D.V.; de Godoy, R.F. A randomized controlled trial of the effect of psychotherapy on anxiety and depression in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2003, 84, 1154–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Güell, R.; Resqueti, V.; Sangenis, M.; Morante, F.; Martorell, B.; Casan, P.; Guyatt, G.H. Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on psychosocial morbidity in patients with severe COPD. Chest 2006, 129, 899–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Beauchamp, M.K.; Janaudis-Ferreira, T.; Parreira, V.; Romano, J.M.; Woon, L.; Goldstein, R.S.; Brooks, D. A randomized controlled trial of balance training during pulmonary rehabilitation for individuals with COPD. Chest 2013, 144, 1803–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Mak, T.C.T.; Capio, C.M.; Wong, T.W.L. Effects of Single-Task, Dual-Task and Analogy Training during Gait Rehabilitation of Older Adults at Risk of Falling: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 20, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Lopez-Lopez, L.; Valenza, M.C.; Rodriguez-Torres, J.; Torres-Sanchez, I.; Granados-Santiago, M.; Valenza-Demet, G. Results on health-related quality of life and functionality of a patient-centered self-management program in hospitalized COPD: A randomized control trial. Disabil. Rehabil. 2020, 42, 3687–3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Hu, J.; Wang, Y.; Ji, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, K.; Huang, F. Non-pharmacological strategies for managing sarcopenia in chronic diseases. Clin. Interv. Aging 2024, 19, 827–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Corrado, A.; Renda, T.; Bertini, S. Long-term oxygen therapy in COPD: Evidences and open questions of current indications. Monaldi Arch. Chest Dis. 2010, 73, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  129. Branson, R.D. Oxygen therapy in COPD. Respir. Care 2018, 63, 734–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Lenferink, A.; van der Palen, J.; Effing, T. The role of social support in improving chronic obstructive pulmonary disease self-management. Expert. Rev. Respir. Med. 2018, 12, 623–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Niederman, M.S.; Clemente, P.H.; Fein, A.M.; Feinsilver, S.H.; Robinson, D.A.; Ilowite, J.S.; Bernstein, M.G. Benefits of a multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation program: Improvements are independent of lung function. Chest 1991, 99, 798–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Nascimento, C.M.; Ingles, M.; Salvador-Pascual, A.; Cominetti, M.R.; Gomez-Cabrera, M.C.; Viña, J. Sarcopenia, frailty and their prevention by exercise. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2019, 132, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Casaburi, R.; ZuWallack, R. Pulmonary rehabilitation for management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360, 1329–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Polkey, M.I.; Qiu, Z.H.; Zhou, L.; Zhu, M.D.; Wu, Y.X.; Chen, Y.Y.; Ye, S.P.; He, Y.S.; Jiang, M.; He, B.T.; et al. Tai Chi and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Compared for Treatment-Naive Patients With COPD: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Chest 2018, 153, 1116–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Puhan, M.A.; Gimeno-Santos, E.; Scharplatz, M.; Troosters, T.; Walters, E.H.; Steurer, J. Pulmonary rehabilitation following exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2011, 12, Cd005305. [Google Scholar]
  136. Wang, X.; Hu, W.; Zhang, J. Advances in pathophysiology and assessment methods of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with frailty. Chin. Med. J. Pulm. Crit. Care Med. 2025, 3, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Vogelmeier, C.F.; Criner, G.J.; Martinez, F.J.; Anzueto, A.; Barnes, P.J.; Bourbeau, J.; Celli, B.R.; Chen, R.; Decramer, M.; Fabbri, L.M.; et al. Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2017 Report. GOLD Executive Summary. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2017, 195, 557–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Bhatt, S.P.; Patel, S.B.; Anderson, E.M.; Baugh, D.; Givens, T.; Schumann, C.; Sanders, J.G.; Windham, S.T.; Cutter, G.R.; Dransfield, M.T. Video Telehealth Pulmonary Rehabilitation Intervention in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Reduces 30-Day Readmissions. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2019, 200, 511–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Cox, N.S.; Rawlings, S.; Lannin, N.A.; Candy, S.; Bhatt, S.P.; Babu, A.S.; Holland, A.E. Supporting delivery of remote pulmonary rehabilitation across different healthcare contexts: A multi-national study. Chron. Respir. Dis. 2024, 21, 14799731241290518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Al Achkar, Z.; Chaaban, T. Palliative care for chronic respiratory diseases in low- and middle-income countries: A narrative review. Ther. Adv. Respir. Dis. 2025, 19, 17534666251318616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Zhu, Z.; Muhamad, A.S.; Omar, N.; Ooi, F.K.; Pan, X.; Ong, M.L.Y. Efficacy of exercise treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2024, 38, 106–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Wilson, J.J.; O’Neill, B.; Collins, E.G.; Bradley, J. Interventions to increase physical activity in patients with COPD: A comprehensive review. COPD J. Chronic Obstr. Pulm. Dis. 2015, 12, 339–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Mohan, D.; Rossiter, H.; Watz, H.; Fogarty, C.; Evans, R.A.; Man, W.; Tabberer, M.; Beerahee, M.; Kumar, S.; Millns, H.; et al. Selective androgen receptor modulation for muscle weakness in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomised control trial. Thorax 2023, 78, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. ur Rehman, A.; Hassali, M.A.A.; Abbas, S.; Ali, I.A.B.H.; Harun, S.N.; Muneswarao, J.; Hussain, R. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological management of COPD; limitations and future prospects: A review of current literature. J. Public Health 2020, 28, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Safka, K.A.; McIvor, R.A. Non-pharmacological management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ulst. Med. J. 2015, 84, 13–21. [Google Scholar]
  146. Naim Gad, E.; Houssien Nasr, M.; Mohamed Mohamed, Y.; Fathi Mahmoud, S. Biopsychosocial Needs of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Egypt J. Health Care 2022, 13, 1100–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the selection process for studies included in the review of interventions targeting sarcopenia and frailty in COPD.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the selection process for studies included in the review of interventions targeting sarcopenia and frailty in COPD.
Nutrients 18 00543 g001
Table 1. Body composition parameters in COPD patients (n = 352) before pulmonary rehabilitation.
Table 1. Body composition parameters in COPD patients (n = 352) before pulmonary rehabilitation.
ParameterMean ± SD
Height (cm)167.5 ± 14.9
Weight (kg)79.8 ± 22.8
Body Mass Index (kg/m2) 28.1 ± 6.9
Body fat (%) 34.3 ± 10.8
Skeletal muscle (%) 27.7 ± 5.4
Resting metabolic rate (kcal) 1611.8 ± 316.9
Visceral fat (index)11.3 ± 5.5
Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Data represent COPD patients who participated in the pulmonary rehabilitation program.
Table 2. Exercise-Based Interventions for Sarcopenia and Frailty in COPD: Evidence from Clinical Trials.
Table 2. Exercise-Based Interventions for Sarcopenia and Frailty in COPD: Evidence from Clinical Trials.
Author, YearStudy Design/PopulationIntervention CategoryIntervention DetailsComparator/ControlOutcome MeasuresKey FindingsLimitations
Bernard et al., 1999
[58]
RCT, COPD patientsResistance Training12-wk supervised RT (3×/wk, progressive loads) Usual careQuadriceps CSA, 6MWD, strength↑ Muscle strength, CSA, and 6MWDSmall sample; short follow-up
Spruit et al., 2002
[59]
RCT, severe COPDResistance TrainingRT vs endurance trainingEndurance trainingMuscle strength, exercise toleranceRT superior in strength; endurance ↑ VO2peak No combined arm
Probst et al., 2011
[60]
RCT, moderate-severe COPDResistance Training12-wk RT with elastic bandsUsual careHandgrip, sit-to-stand, HRQoLImproved functional performance and QoLLimited intensity progression
Maltais et al., 1997
[61]
RCT, moderate-severe COPDEndurance Training12-wk continuous training (cycling, 60–70% VO2max) Usual careExercise capacity, dyspnea↑ VO2max, ↓ dyspneaNo frailty-specific outcomes
Vogiatzis et al., 2002
[47]
RCT, severe COPDEndurance TrainingInterval vs continuous trainingContinuous training6MWD, dyspneaInterval training improved tolerance with less dyspneaSmall sample
Puhan et al., 2006
[62]
RCT, COPDEndurance Training8-wk aerobic training (walking/cycling) Standard careHRQoL, 6MWD↑ HRQoL, 6MWDNo muscle mass outcomes
Zwerink et al., 2014
[63]
Meta-analysis, COPDEndurance TrainingAerobic training (8–24 wks) ControlDyspnea, 6MWDConsistent ↑ tolerance, QoLNo hypertrophy effect
Spruit et al., 2013
[4]
Prospective cohort, COPDPulmonary Rehabilitation12-wk multicomponent PRUsual careExercise capacity, QoL, frailty↑ 6MWD, QoL, frailty indicesSelection bias
Maddocks et al., 2016
[64]
RCT, COPD with frailtyPulmonary Rehabilitation8-wk PRUsual careFrailty phenotype, strengthImproved frailty scores, quadriceps strengthShort follow-up
Gloeckl et al., 2018
[65]
Review COPDPulmonary RehabilitationHigh-intensity PR vs standard PRStandard PRExercise tolerance, QoLGreater gains with high-intensity PRSafety in severe frailty uncertain
McCarthy et al., 2015
[66]
Cochrane reviewPulmonary RehabilitationPR programs (varied protocols) Usual careHRQoL, exercise capacityStrong evidence for PR effectivenessHeterogeneity; adherence barriers
Maltais et al., 2008
[67]
RCT, COPDHome/Tele-PR8-wk home-based exercise programUsual care6MWD, dyspnea, HRQoLComparable to outpatient PRAdherence variable
Holland et al., 2017
[34]
RCT, moderate-severe COPDHome/Tele-PRTele-PR via video [8 wks] Conventional PRExercise capacity, QoLNon-inferior to center PRRequires digital literacy
Bourne et al., 2017
[32]
RCT, COPDHome/Tele-PRWeb-based PR (12 wks) Usual careExercise tolerance, QoL↑ 6MWD, QoL; lower completion than PRHigh attrition
Cox et al., 2021
[68]
Systematic reviewHome/Tele-PRHome/tele-PR vs center PRCenter PRFunctional outcomes, QoLComparable short-term outcomesLong-term sustainability uncertain
Neder et al., 2002
[69]
RCT, severe COPDNMESNMES (30 min/day, 6 wks) Usual careStrength, endurance↑ Quadriceps endurance and strengthSmall cohort
Vivodtzev et al., 2006 [70]RCT, severe COPDNMESNMES vs shamShamExercise tolerance, QoL↑ 6MWD, QoL, muscle strengthShort-term
Sillen et al., 2008
[71]
RCT, advanced COPDNMESNMES (5×/wk, 6 wks) Usual careMuscle mass, performanceFunctional benefits, limited hypertrophySmall sample
Zambom-Ferraresi et al., 2015
[72]
RCT; moderate–severe COPDResistance training12-wk combined RT/(1×/wk) + endurance (1×/wk) RT alone (2×/wk) Strength, power, Wmax, 6MWD, QoLSimilar strength & 6MWD gains; ↑ muscle power and ↑ endurance with combined trainingSmall sample; short follow-up
COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CSA: cross-sectional area; HRQoL: health-related quality of life; NMES: neuromuscular electrical stimulation; PR: pulmonary rehabilitation; QoL: quality of life; RCT: randomized controlled trial; RT: resistance training; VO2max: maximal oxygen uptake; Wmax: maximal workload; wk: week; 6MWD: 6-min walk distance; ↑: increase; ↓: decrease. Arrows indicate direction of change compared with the control or comparator group.
Table 3. Nutritional Strategies to Mitigate Sarcopenia and Frailty in COPD: Clinical Evidence.
Table 3. Nutritional Strategies to Mitigate Sarcopenia and Frailty in COPD: Clinical Evidence.
Author, YearStudy Design/PopulationIntervention DetailsComparator/ControlOutcome MeasuresKey FindingsLimitations
Dal Negro et al., 2012
[22]
RCT; COPD with malnutritionHigh-protein ONS (400–600 kcal/day, 12–20 g protein) for 12 wksStandard dietBody weight, FFM, 6MWD, QoL↑ body weight, FFM, and exercise toleranceSmall sample size; adherence variable
Steiner et al., 2003
[77]
RCT; undernourished COPDONS + exercise training, 12 wksExercise aloneFFM, strength, 6MWDCombined ONS + training ↑ muscle mass & functional gains more than training aloneHigh dropout; adherence issues
Broekhuizen et al., 2005
[73]
RCT; COPD, weight loss ≥ 5%Nutrient-enriched ONS (protein, carbs, fat, vits/minerals) for 12 wksPlacebo ONSWeight, muscle function, exercise capacity↑ weight and functional statusModest effect on muscle strength
Hornikx et al., 2012
[81]
Post hoc analysis of RCT; COPD patients in PR (n = 50) Vitamin D3 100,000 IU monthly + PR, 3 monthsPlacebo + PRExercise capacity, muscle strength↑ inspiratory muscle strength; ↑ VO2maxSmall sample; short duration
Bjerk et al., 2013
[82]
Pilot RCT, severe COPD (n = 36) Cholecalciferol 2000 IU/day, 6 wksPlaceboSPPB, QoL, serum 25(OH)D↑ 25(OH)D; no improvement in physical performance or QoLShort duration; small sample; male-only cohort
Gouzi et al., 2019
[83]
RCT, COPD in PR (n = 64) Nutritional supplementation [antioxidants] Placebo + PRMuscle endurance, strength, oxidative stress↑ Muscle strength, ↓ muscle weakness; no added effect on enduranceShort duration; primary outcome negative
Weekes et al., 2009 [84]RCT, stable COPD outpatients at nutritional risk (n = 59)Dietary counselling + food fortification, 6 moDietary advice leafletNutritional status, dyspnoea, ADL, QoL, muscle strength↑ Energy & protein intake, ↑ weight, ↑ QoL, ↓ dyspnoea; no change in muscle strengthUnblinded; small sample; no functional muscle gain
ADL: activities of daily living; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; FFM: fat-free mass; IU: international units; ONS: oral nutritional supplements; PR: pulmonary rehabilitation; QoL: quality of life; RCT: randomized controlled trial; SPPB: Short Physical Performance Battery; VO2max: maximal oxygen uptake; wk: week; wks: weeks; mo: months; 25(OH)D: 25-hydroxyvitamin D; 6MWD: 6-min walk distance; ↑: increase; ↓: decrease. Arrows indicate direction of change compared with the control or comparator group.
Table 4. Pharmacologic and Adjunctive Non-Pharmacologic Interventions for Sarcopenia and Frailty in COPD.
Table 4. Pharmacologic and Adjunctive Non-Pharmacologic Interventions for Sarcopenia and Frailty in COPD.
Intervention TypeAuthor, YearPopulation/Study DesignIntervention (Duration/Dose) ComparatorOutcomesKey FindingsLimitations
Anabolic HormonesCasaburi et al., 2004
[98]
COPD men; RCTTestosterone enanthate 100 mg IM weekly + PR, 10 wksPR + placeboLBM, leg strength, 6MWD↑ LBM (~2 kg), ↑ strengthAdverse effects; men only
Svartberg et al., 2004
[112]
COPD men w/ low testosterone; RCTOral testosterone undecanoate, 6 moPlaceboStrength, QoL↑ handgrip strengthSmall sample
Burdet et al., 1997
[24]
COPD, malnourished; RCTGH
0.05 mg/kg/day, 3 wks
PlaceboFFM, exercise tolerance↑ FFM; no functional gainEdema, glucose intolerance
Dalton et al., 2011
[113]
Older adults; Phase II RCTSARM (enobosarm)
3 mg/day, 12 wks
PlaceboLBM, stair climb power↑ LBM & powerLimited COPD-specific data
Anti-inflammatory/MetabolicFrost et al., 2007
[114]
COPD; ObservationalStatins chronic useNon-usersMuscle function, exacerbationMixed; possible ↓ inflammationMyopathy risk
Aaron et al., 2013
[115]
RCT, acute COPD exacerbationEtanercept 50 mg SC (baseline + 1 wk) Prednisone 40 mg/day ×10 dFEV1, treatment failure, dyspnoea, QoLNo superiority over prednisone; similar FEV1, failure rates, QoLSmall sample; no long-term outcomes; infection risk
Myostatin/Emerging MoleculesPolkey et al., 2019
[116]
Phase II RCT, COPD with low muscle massBimagrumab 30 mg/kg IV, 24 wksPlaceboThigh muscle volume, 6MWD, strength↑ muscle volume (~5–8%); no significant ↑ 6MWDLimited functional benefit; short duration; cost
Coats et al., 2016
[117]
Chronic illness (COPD); Phase IIEspindololPlaceboWeight, FFM, strength↑ FFM & strengthLimited COPD-specific evidence; safety unknown
Gilson et al., 2009
[118]
Preclinical COPD modelsFollistatin gene therapyControlMuscle hypertrophy↑ muscle sizePreclinical only
Respiratory-TargetedO’Donnell et al., 2004
[119]
COPD; RCTLABA (salmeterol) 12 wksPlaceboExercise tolerance, dyspnea↓ hyperinflation, ↑ toleranceMinimal direct anabolic effect
Brusasco et al., 2003
[120]
COPD; RCTLAMA (tiotropium) 6 moPlacebo6MWD, QoL↑ distance, QoLMuscle outcomes indirect
Fishman et al., 2003
[108]
Severe emphysema; RCTLVRS vs medical therapyMedical therapyQoL, exercise, survival↑ QoL, exercise; survival benefitHigh morbidity; strict criteria
Clini et al., 2002
[121]
COPD hypercapnia; RCTNocturnal NIVUsual careQoL, exercise↑ rehab tolerance, QoLAdherence issues
NMESVivodtzev et al., 2006
[70]
Severe COPD unable to exercise; RCTNMES 35–50 Hz, 30 min/day, 6 wksSham NMESQuadriceps strength, endurance↑ strength, mobility, QoLSmall sample; equipment dependent
Sillen et al., 2008
[71]
COPD in rehab; RCTNMES + PR, 8 wksPR aloneMuscle mass, 6MWD↑ strength & walkingResponse variability
Psychosocial/Cognitive Supportde Godoy & de Godoy, 2003
[122]
COPD w/ depression; RCTCBT 12 wksUsual careDepression, QoL↓ depression, ↑ QoLSmall sample
Güell et al., 2006
[123]
COPD in PR; RCTPsychosocial support + PRPR aloneAdherence, exercise↑ adherence, ↓ anxietyLimited generalizability
Fall Prevention/Functional IndependenceBeauchamp et al., 2013
[124]
COPD, balance impaired; RCTBalance + strength 12 wksUsual PRFalls, balance, 6MWD↓ falls, ↑ balance & functionShort follow-up
Mak et al., 2022
[125]
Older adults; RCTSingle-task, dual-task, and analogy training; 12 sessionsStandard trainingGait, balance, mobility, fear of falling↑ Gait & balance in all groups; AG superior for single- & dual-task walkingShort-term follow-up;
Lopez-Lopez et al., 2020
[126]
RCT, hospitalized severe COPDDaily individualized self-management + physiotherapy + NMESUsual careHRQoL, functionality↑ HRQoL & function; best outcomes in self-management group; maintained at 3 monthsSmall sample; short follow-up
AG: analogy group; CBT: cognitive behavioral therapy; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; FFM: fat-free mass; GH: growth hormone; HRQoL: health-related quality of life; LABA: long-acting β2-agonist; LAMA: long-acting muscarinic antagonist; LBM: lean body mass; NMES: neuromuscular electrical stimulation; NIV: non-invasive ventilation; PR: pulmonary rehabilitation; QoL: quality of life; RCT: randomized controlled trial; SARM: selective androgen receptor modulator; 6MWD: 6-min walk distance; ↑: increase; ↓: decrease.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Naas, S.; Fekete, M.; Szendro, G.; Komaromi, T.; Rozgonyi, Z.; Palmer, E.; Polivka, L.; Bakos, R.; Szalai, B.; Muller, V.; et al. Multimodal Therapeutic Strategies for the Management of Sarcopenia and Frailty in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2026, 18, 543. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18030543

AMA Style

Naas S, Fekete M, Szendro G, Komaromi T, Rozgonyi Z, Palmer E, Polivka L, Bakos R, Szalai B, Muller V, et al. Multimodal Therapeutic Strategies for the Management of Sarcopenia and Frailty in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Review. Nutrients. 2026; 18(3):543. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18030543

Chicago/Turabian Style

Naas, Saoussen, Monika Fekete, Gabriella Szendro, Tamas Komaromi, Zsolt Rozgonyi, Erik Palmer, Lorinc Polivka, Regina Bakos, Borbala Szalai, Veronika Muller, and et al. 2026. "Multimodal Therapeutic Strategies for the Management of Sarcopenia and Frailty in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Review" Nutrients 18, no. 3: 543. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18030543

APA Style

Naas, S., Fekete, M., Szendro, G., Komaromi, T., Rozgonyi, Z., Palmer, E., Polivka, L., Bakos, R., Szalai, B., Muller, V., & Varga, J. T. (2026). Multimodal Therapeutic Strategies for the Management of Sarcopenia and Frailty in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Review. Nutrients, 18(3), 543. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18030543

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop