Next Article in Journal
Investigation into the Potential Mechanism of Radix Paeoniae Rubra Against Ischemic Stroke Based on Network Pharmacology
Previous Article in Journal
Adipokines and Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase as Biomarkers of Metabolic Syndrome Risk in Mexican School-Aged Children
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Coffee on Gut Microbiota and Bowel Functions in Health and Diseases: A Literature Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Importance of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation and Molecular Regulation as Therapeutic Strategies in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

1
Department of Internal Medicine VII, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures, Gheorghe Marinescu Street No. 38, 540136 Targu Mures, Romania
2
Faculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania
3
Faculty of Social Sciences, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550012 Sibiu, Romania
4
Department of Neurology, “George Emil Palade” University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology, 540136 Targu Mures, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2024, 16(24), 4411; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16244411
Submission received: 17 November 2024 / Revised: 12 December 2024 / Accepted: 14 December 2024 / Published: 23 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diet–Microbiome Interaction in Gastrointestinal Disorders)

Abstract

:
Noncoding RNAs, particularly microRNAs (miRNAs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), have emerged as key players in the pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). MiRNAs, small endogenous RNA molecules that silence target mRNAs to regulate gene expression, are closely linked to immune responses and inflammatory pathways in IBD. Notably, miR-21, miR-146a, and miR-155 are consistently upregulated in IBD, influencing immune cell modulation, cytokine production, and the intestinal epithelial barrier. These miRNAs serve as biomarkers for disease progression and severity, as well as therapeutic targets for controlling inflammation. This comprehensive review highlights the intricate interplay between the gut microbiota, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), and miRNA regulation. It concludes that microbiota and FMT influence miRNA activity, presenting a promising avenue for personalized IBD treatment.

1. Introduction

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an emerging area of research for its potential therapeutic benefits in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), such as Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Recently, there has been a growing interest in exploring FMT as a type of “vaccine” to modulate the immune system and maintain remission in IBD patients [1,2].
FMT involves transferring stool from a healthy donor into the gastrointestinal tract of a patient. This process aims to restore a balanced microbial community in the recipient’s gut, which can be disrupted in individuals with IBD. IBD is often associated with dysbiosis, an imbalance in gut microbiota. FMT helps restore microbial diversity, which can enhance the gut’s resilience against inflammation [3,4].
FMT may be considered a vaccine-like treatment line; the idea of using FMT as a “vaccine” in IBD involves several key aspects, such as microbial diversity restoration and immune modulation, and the most important result could be long-term remission [5,6,7].
FMT may represent a key therapy line and outline the concept of personalized medicine; nowadays, research focuses on personalized FMT approaches, tailoring treatments based on individual microbial profiles and specific disease characteristics. Moreover, FMT may be used in conjunction with other treatments, such as immunosuppression drugs or biologics, to enhance therapeutic outcomes [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in modulating the immune system. By introducing a healthy microbial community, FMT can potentially downregulate inflammatory responses and promote immune tolerance. Like vaccines, which aim to provide long-term protection against diseases, FMT aims to induce and maintain long-term remission in IBD patients by stabilizing the gut environment [15,16,17,18,19,20].
Several studies and clinical trials are investigating the efficacy of FMT in IBD. Early trials have shown that FMT can be safe and effective in inducing remission in some patients with IBD, particularly those with ulcerative colitis. Research is ongoing to understand the specific mechanisms through which FMT exerts its effects, including changes in microbial composition, metabolite production, and immune regulation [8,9,10]. Identifying optimal donor characteristics is crucial for the success of FMT. Donors are typically screened for a wide range of pathogens to ensure safety [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Efforts are being made to standardize FMT procedures, including donor screening, stool processing, and administration methods, to ensure the consistency and reproducibility of results [30,31,32,33,34,35].
FMT holds promise as a novel, personal therapy for managing IBD by restoring microbial balance and modulating the immune system. However, more research is needed to fully understand its potential and to optimize its application in clinical practice. One step towards understanding the importance of FMT in different disorders is to understand its molecular mechanisms [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has intriguing implications for miRNA (microRNA) regulation, which can significantly influence the psychophysiology and treatment outcomes of various diseases, including inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) [8,9,10]. MicroRNAs are small, noncoding RNAs that play a crucial role in gene regulation by modulating the expression of target mRNAs. Here is how FMT might affect miRNA regulation. The gut microbiota can affect the host’s miRNA expression profiles. Changes in the gut microbial composition after FMT can lead to alterations in the host’s miRNA expression, which in turn can impact various biological processes and disease states [8,9,10,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60].
Certain bacterial species in the gut have been shown to produce metabolites that can modulate miRNA expression. For example, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) produced by gut bacteria can influence the expression of miRNAs involved in inflammation and immune response [11,12,13,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70].
In IBD, dysbiosis is often associated with abnormal miRNA expression that promotes inflammation. FMT can restore a healthy microbial balance, potentially normalizing miRNA expression, reducing inflammation, and restoring normal miRNA levels to regulate the immune system [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,71]. MiRNAs such as miR-155 and miR-146a are known to regulate inflammatory pathways. By modulating the gut microbiota through FMT, the expression of these miRNAs can be adjusted, leading to altered inflammatory responses in the gut [11,12,13,14,15,16,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29].
This is the first review of literature that outlines the importance of molecular changes that result after FMT in IBD and its possible clinical benefits for the treatment of IBD and establishing long remission based on molecular modifications.

2. Materials and Methods

In this review on the fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) interplay with miRNA in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), we conducted a comprehensive literature search across multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Searches were conducted using relevant keywords such as “fecal microbiota transplantation”, “FMT”, “miRNA”, “AMPs”, and “inflammatory bowel disease” in combination with terms like “Crohn’s disease”, “ulcerative colitis”, and “gut microbiota”. Our review included studies published in English between [insert years] and prioritized randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and meta-analyses with human subjects. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria, which encompassed research on the safety, efficacy, and mechanisms of FMT in IBD. Data extraction focused on participant characteristics, FMT protocols, clinical outcomes, and microbiota-related changes.
The primary outcome of this review is to assess the importance of molecular treatments in personalized therapeutic strategies in IBD based on miRNA regulation and interconnections between miRNA and FMT. As far as we have researched in the current literature, this is the only review that outlines possible connections between miRNA and FMT in treating IBD.

2.1. MiRNA and AMPs Regulation in Fecal Microbiota Transplantation

Microbes in the gut can produce miRNA-like molecules that may directly interact with the host’s cellular machinery, influencing gene expression [40]. FMT can induce epigenetic changes, including DNA methylation and histone modification, which can affect miRNA expression and thereby modulate gene regulation [40,61,72]. The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in shaping the host’s immune system [71,72]. Changes in the microbial community through FMT can lead to the modulation of miRNAs that are involved in immune cell differentiation and function [72]. Clinical implications are emphasized due to changes in miRNA expression profiles after FMT, which can serve as biomarkers for treatment response, helping to predict which patients are likely to benefit from FMT [5,6,7]. Interaction between gut microbiota and miRNA expression highlights the potential for personalized medicine approaches in IBD, where treatments are tailored based on individual microbiota and miRNA profiles [73]. MiRNAs have multiple clinical benefits and are a target of new research directions to elucidate the precise mechanisms by which FMT influences miRNA expression and the downstream effects on gene regulation [11,20,21,22,23,24,25].
Investigating the long-term effects of FMT on miRNA regulation and the stability of these changes over time is crucial for understanding its potential as a durable therapeutic intervention. Exploring the synergistic effects of FMT combined with other treatments, such as miRNA-based therapies or traditional IBD medications, could enhance therapeutic outcomes [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45].
Besides, targeted therapies such as monoclonal antibodies targeting specific cytokines or cell surface molecules (e.g., TNF inhibitors like infliximab and adalimumab, IL-12/23 inhibitors like ustekinumab) have transformed IBD treatment [71]. Genetic insights can help identify which patients are more likely to respond to these biologics; other small molecule inhibitors targeting intracellular signaling pathways (e.g., Janus kinase inhibitors like tofacitinib) based on genetic profiles can provide another layer of precision in treatment [11].
Therapies for IBD based on genetic insights are paving the way for more personalized and effective treatment strategies. By targeting specific genetic pathways and considering individual genetic profiles, these approaches hold promise for improving the outcomes and quality of life for patients with IBD [11,71]. The aim of this review is to identify potential therapeutic benefits regarding molecular therapies like miRNA and the implications of FMT in regulating the pathways and types of miRNAs and regulating antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) [73,74].
We emphasize that this is the first review of literature that describes potential personalized therapies based on FMT, miRNAs, and AMP regulation. Also, an important outcome of this review is to highlight the importance of FMT in inducing molecular changes and improving gut microbiota.
Besides miRNA, FMT may also regulate antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) in IBD. AMPs are crucial components of the innate immune system, playing a vital role in defending against pathogens and maintaining intestinal homeostasis. In IBD, the secretion and function of AMPs are often disrupted, contributing to disease pathogenesis [72,73,74]. First of all, defensins represent a major group of AMPs, with α-defensins produced by Paneth cells in the small intestine and β-defensins produced by epithelial cells; the dysregulation of AMPs is implicated in the development and progression of IBD [73,74]. In IBD, particularly Crohn’s disease, there is a notable reduction in α-defensins, leading to impaired mucosal barrier function and increased susceptibility to infections. Also, cathelicidin LL-37, the active form of cathelicidin, has antimicrobial and immunomodulatory functions; alterations in LL-37 expression have been observed in IBD patients, potentially exacerbating inflammation and barrier dysfunction [60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74].
Recent therapeutic approaches focus on restoring AMP levels through FMT, improving human β-defensin, which has shown promise in increasing gut microbiota diversity and improving experimental colitis in mice [72,73,74].
FMT may regulate miRNA and AMP secretion in the case of IBD, opening the pathways toward personalized molecular treatment [11,71,72,73,74].
FMT reestablishes a healthy gut microbial balance, which is crucial for the regulation of AMP production. Microbiota-derived signals can influence epithelial cells and immune cells, promoting the secretion of AMPs like defensins and LL-37 [73,74]. Additionally, FMT can modulate other pathways that indirectly affect AMP levels, such as reducing inflammation or enhancing mucosal healing, further stabilizing AMP activity [73,74,75].
Another molecular implication of FMT is represented by miRNA expression profiles, which represent potential biomarkers for treatment efficacy, enabling predictions about patient response to therapy. This aspect is particularly important for personalized medicine approaches in IBD, where interventions are tailored based on individual microbiota and miRNA signatures [73,75]. The ability to modulate miRNA through FMT underscores its therapeutic promise, particularly when combined with other targeted therapies like miRNA-based treatments or conventional IBD medications [76].
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) plays a significant role in influencing host molecular pathways, particularly through its effects on microRNA (miRNA) expression and regulation in the context of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [72,73,74].
The gut microbiota, a critical component in maintaining intestinal and systemic homeostasis, can produce miRNA-like molecules that directly interact with the host’s cellular processes, influencing gene expression. FMT-induced changes in gut microbiota composition can lead to epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation and histone changes, which in turn modulate miRNA profiles [71,72,75,76].
These miRNAs influence diverse cellular processes, including immune cell differentiation and function, thus shaping the host’s immune responses. Research is increasingly focused on understanding the durability of miRNA modulation following FMT and its long-term implications for gene regulation and immune function. Combining FMT with therapies such as monoclonal antibodies targeting specific cytokines (e.g., TNF inhibitors like infliximab or IL-12/23 inhibitors like ustekinumab) or small molecule inhibitors of intracellular pathways (e.g., Janus kinase inhibitors like tofacitinib) offers opportunities for synergistic therapeutic outcomes [76]. By leveraging genetic and epigenetic insights, these combinations could optimize treatment effectiveness and improve the quality of life for patients with IBD [76].
Another crucial aspect that should be further studied is represented by the long-term safety and potential immunogenicity of miRNA therapies, which need thorough evaluation in clinical trials [11,76]. Also, the development and approval of miRNA-based therapies involve rigorous regulatory oversight to ensure safety and efficacy. Table 1 highlights the interplay between antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) in inflammatory conditions, particularly inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76].
Table 1 illustrates how miRNAs can either upregulate or downregulate AMP expression, thereby influencing inflammatory pathways and the immune environment in the gut. Some miRNAs (e.g., miR-21 and miR-155) tend to exacerbate inflammation, while others (e.g., miR-146a and miR-223) play more regulatory roles, balancing AMP activity and immune responses essential for gut homeostasis [71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79].

2.2. Therapeutic Strategies Based on Molecular Therapies

Current research and clinical trials concerning miRNA are developing different therapeutic strategies regarding possible ways to regulate genes in IBD, and molecular treatments in IBD could change. Various animal and human models of IBD are being used to test the efficacy of miRNA-based therapies [60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77].
These studies are essential for understanding the therapeutic potential and mechanisms of action; also, important clinical trials are focused on establishing the importance of therapeutic strategies based on miRNA; some miRNA-based therapies are progressing to early-phase clinical trials, evaluating their safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy in IBD patients [77].
Preclinical studies are focused on exploring specific miRNAs like miR-21, miR-146a, miR-155, and miR-223 for their roles in inflammation modulation and intestinal healing [77,78,79].
Animal models such as DSS (dextran sulfate sodium) and TNBS (2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid) colitis are commonly used, with miRNA delivery methods also being optimized through nanoparticle and liposomal technologies [77,78,79].
Early-phase clinical trials in humans are testing the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of these therapies, with encouraging results in symptom reduction and immune modulation observed; miRNA therapy offers a promising new avenue for the treatment of IBD by targeting specific molecular pathways involved in inflammation and immune regulation [60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79].
While still in the experimental stages, advancements in delivery technologies and a better understanding of miRNA biology could make this approach viable for IBD management [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55].
In parallel, miR-146a knockout mice demonstrated resistance to the dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis by inhibiting genes associated with the intestinal barrier. Conversely, the overexpression of miR-146b conferred protection against DSS-induced colitis by activating NF-κB signaling and enhancing epithelial barrier function [77,78,79,80].
Based on these findings, researchers investigated the administration of miR-146a via extracellular vesicles in rats with trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced colitis [77,78,79,80]. This approach led to increased miR-146a expression in the colon, which alleviated colitis by reducing inflammation through the MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways. Additionally, the oral administration of miR-146b-loaded nanoparticles protected miR-146b-deficient mice from DSS-induced colitis [80].
This protective effect was characterized by a decrease in the expression of proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and TNF-α in M1 macrophages and an increase in M2 macrophages, underscoring miR-146b’s role in promoting the transition from a proinflammatory M1 to an anti-inflammatory M2 macrophage phenotype [80]. However, conflicting data have emerged from studies showing that the suppression of miR-146a, either by a synthetic inhibitor or through the oral administration of the antidiabetic drug vildagliptin, resulted in the amelioration of experimentally induced colitis in rats [70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80].
A study showed that miR-146a knockout mice developed severe colitis, highlighting its protective role in intestinal inflammation. Research demonstrated that increasing miR-146a expression in mice could alleviate symptoms of experimental colitis, suggesting its therapeutic potential. An animal study found that mice deficient in miR-155 had reduced susceptibility to colitis, supporting its role in promoting inflammation [77,78,79,80].
Another study by Singh et al. showed that inhibiting miR-155 could reduce inflammatory responses in a mouse model of IBD, indicating that miR-155 antagonists might be effective in treating IBD [81]. These findings suggest that targeting miRNAs could be a promising strategy for developing new treatments for IBD. Similarly, modulating the levels of specific miRNAs like miR-146a and miR-155 could help control the chronic inflammation that characterizes this condition. However, further clinical studies are needed to translate these findings into effective therapies [77,78,79,80,81].
Based on how FMT is involved in restoring gut homeostasis and its interplay in the regulation of miRNA and AMPs, we can consider FMT a potential therapeutic tool that regulates molecular changes in miRNAs [71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81].
A similar and natural way to modulate the microbiota and the molecular pathways is represented by FMT. Transferring gut microbiota from a healthy donor may influence the patient’s miRNA expression. By restoring a healthy microbial balance through FMT, the expression of miRNAs involved in inflammation and immune regulation can be modulated. Gut bacteria produce metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) that can affect miRNA expression. These metabolites can impact cellular processes and inflammatory responses [55,56,57,58,59,60].
Another treatment direction is regulating the disturbance in AMP secretion associated with IBD, which has opened up new perspectives of treatment with oral administration of defensins as a promising therapeutic option. Specific modifications can enrich these peptides in the mucus at different intestinal locations, protecting the epithelial layer from bacteria in the lumen. Recent findings indicate that the oral delivery of human β-defensin 2 increases gut microbiota diversity and is effective in treating experimental colitis in mice. The development of new therapeutic molecules targeting Crohn’s disease is ongoing, though clinical use is still in its early stages [77,78,79,80].
The disturbance of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) has garnered significant interest due to their roles in maintaining gut homeostasis and immune responses [77,78]. This review primarily assessed to highlight the importance of FMT in IBD and its possible connection with molecular changes. Another outcome of the review is to outline the importance of molecular and gene therapy, recently studied, and present potential clinical benefits that could represent the future personalized treatment of IBD.
A possible genetic treatment could be RNA Interference (RNAi), which can be used to silence specific genes involved in the inflammatory response. This approach is being explored for its potential to modulate gene expression in IBD [77,78,79]. Synthetically designed miRNA mimics can restore the levels of beneficial miRNAs that are downregulated in IBD, helping to suppress inflammation as antagomirs. These are chemically modified RNA molecules designed to inhibit overexpressed, pathogenic miRNAs. For example, targeting miR-155 or miR-21, known to promote inflammation in IBD, could mitigate disease severity [77,78].
Identifying specific miRNA expression patterns in patients with IBD could guide personalized therapeutic strategies. Profiling could help classify the subtypes of IBD, predict disease progression, or monitor responses to treatment. Exploring the role of miRNAs in individual genetic predispositions and epigenetic changes could tailor more effective interventions [77,78]. Utilizing liposomes, polymer nanoparticles, or lipid nanoparticles to ensure targeted delivery to intestinal tissues while protecting miRNAs from degradation could present important clinical benefits to act as miRNA mimics; antagomirs, harnessing natural exosomes as carriers for miRNAs could enhance delivery specificity and reduce off-target effects [77,78,79,80,81]. Although these molecular therapies need further studies, highlighting their importance as potential therapeutic strategies and clinical benefits is very important and could open new research pathways; moreover, miRNA-based therapies offer a unique opportunity to modulate disease pathways with high specificity and minimal side effects. However, further research and technological advances are necessary to translate these innovations into viable treatments for IBD [77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84].
Table 2 summarizes the miRNAs that have been explored as treatments for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). These miRNAs can influence inflammation, immune modulation, and tissue repair mechanisms, offering potential therapeutic avenues Table 3.
These miRNAs are still under preclinical and early-stage clinical investigation. Current studies emphasize targeted delivery systems to ensure they reach specific intestinal cells, as well as minimize off-target effects and improve stability within the gastrointestinal tract [71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84].
Although, at the moment, there are very few studies regarding the importance of FMT, miRNA, and AMPs in IBD, future research could be promising in establishing a personalized treatment for patients with severe forms of IBD.

3. Conclusions

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is emerging as a promising therapeutic approach for regulating microRNAs (miRNAs) in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). MiRNAs are small, noncoding RNAs essential for gene expression regulation, and their dysregulation is closely linked to IBD. This review highlights the intricate relationship between FMT, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), and miRNAs in maintaining intestinal immunity and homeostasis. MiRNAs can modulate AMP expression, and AMPs, in turn, can influence miRNA activity, with FMT playing a pivotal role in regulating both. Understanding this interplay is critical for developing holistic therapeutic strategies for IBD. Disruptions in AMPs and miRNAs are integral to IBD pathogenesis, underscoring their interconnected roles. Notably, FMT shows potential clinical benefits by restoring miRNA and AMP balance, thereby aiding in mucosal barrier repair and immune response modulation. Targeting these molecules through therapeutic interventions offers a promising avenue for improving IBD outcomes. However, further research is needed to unravel their precise mechanisms and translate these insights into effective treatments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.O., A.B., P.C., D.M.O., R.-F.C. and A.C.; software, R.-F.I., B.S. and S.A.; validation, G.B., S.F. and S.A.; formal analysis, B.S.; investigation, B.O., A.B. and D.M.O.; resources, A.B.; writing—original draft preparation, R.-F.C. and R.-F.I.; writing—reviewing and editing, H.D., B.S. and G.B.; visualization, A.C.; supervision, S.-R.F. and S.A.; project administration, A.B. and P.C.; funding acquisition, B.S., S.-R.F. and P.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee in Scientific Research of the Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, approval code nr. 15, approval date 15 October 2022.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Aggeletopoulou, I.; Mouzaki, A.; Thomopoulos, K.; Triantos, C. miRNA Molecules-Late Breaking Treatment for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  2. Innocenti, T.; Bigagli, E.; Lynch, E.N.; Galli, A.; Dragoni, G. MiRNA-Based Therapies for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: What Are We Still Missing? Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2022, 29, 308–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Xiao, X.; Mao, X.; Chen, D.; Yu, B.; He, J.; Yan, H.; Wang, J. miRNAs Can Affect Intestinal Epithelial Barrier in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 868229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  4. Schoultz, I.; Keita, Å.V. Cellular and Molecular Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Focusing on Intestinal Barrier Function. Cells 2019, 8, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  5. Pekow, J.R.; Kwon, J.H. MicroRNAs in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2012, 18, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tian, T.; Zhou, Y.; Feng, X.; Ye, S.; Wang, H.; Wu, W.; Tan, W.; Yu, C.; Hu, J.; Zheng, R.; et al. MicroRNA-16 is putatively involved in the NF-κB pathway regulation in ulcerative colitis through adenosine A2a receptor (A2aAR) mRNA targeting. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wortelboer, K.; Bakker, G.J.; Winkelmeijer, M.; van Riel, N.; Levin, E.; Nieuwdorp, M.; Herrema, H.; Davids, M. Fecal microbiota transplantation as tool to study the interrelation between microbiota composition and miRNA expression. Microbiol. Res. 2022, 257, 126972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wu, X.; Pan, S.; Luo, W.; Shen, Z.; Meng, X.; Xiao, M.; Tan, B.; Nie, K.; Tong, T.; Wang, X. Roseburia intestinalis-derived flagellin ameliorates colitis by targeting miR-223-3p-mediated activation of NLRP3 inflammasome and pyroptosis. Mol. Med. Rep. 2020, 22, 2695–2704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xiao, L.; Ma, X.X.; Luo, J.; Chung, H.K.; Kwon, M.S.; Yu, T.X.; Rao, J.N.; Kozar, R.; Gorospe, M.; Wang, J.Y. Circular RNA CircHIPK3 Promotes Homeostasis of the Intestinal Epithelium by Reducing MicroRNA 29b Function. Gastroenterology 2021, 161, 1303–1317.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Yin, B.; Tian-Chu, H.; Ling-Fen, X. Protection by microRNA-7a-5p Antagomir Against Intestinal Mucosal Injury Related to the JNK Pathway in TNBS-Induced Experimental Colitis. Turk. J. Gastroenterol. 2021, 32, 431–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Yu, T.; Meng, F.; Xie, M.; Liu, H.; Zhang, L.; Chen, X. Long Noncoding RNA PMS2L2 Downregulates miR-24 through Methylation to Suppress Cell Apoptosis in Ulcerative Colitis. Dig. Dis. 2021, 39, 467–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Onisor, D.; Brusnic, O.; Banescu, C.; Carstea, C.; Sasaran, M.; Stoian, M.; Avram, C.; Boicean, A.; Boeriu, A.; Dobru, D. miR-155 and miR-21 as Diagnostic and Therapeutic Biomarkers for Ulcerative Colitis: There Is Still a Long Way to Go. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  13. Ahmed Hassan, E.; El-Din Abd El-Rehim, A.S.; Mohammed Kholef, E.F.; Abd-Elgwad Elsewify, W. Potential role of plasma miR-21 and miR-92a in distinguishing between irritable bowel syndrome, ulcerative colitis, and colorectal cancer. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed. Bench. 2020, 13, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  14. Iborra, M.; Bernuzzi, F.; Invernizzi, P.; Danese, S. MicroRNAs in autoimmunity and inflammatory bowel disease: Crucial regulators in immune response. Autoimmun. Rev. 2012, 11, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ma, L.; Hou, C.; Yang, H.; Chen, Q.; Lyu, W.; Wang, Z.; Wang, J.; Xiao, Y. Multi-omics analysis reveals the interaction of gut microbiome and host microRNAs in ulcerative colitis. Ann. Med. 2023, 55, 2261477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fu, Q.; Ma, X.; Li, S.; Shi, M.; Song, T.; Cui, J. New insights into the interactions between the gut microbiota and the inflammatory response to ulcerative colitis in a mouse model of dextran sodium sulfate and possible mechanisms of action for treatment with PE&AFWE. Anim. Model. Exp. Med. 2024, 7, 83–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ekstedt, N.; Jamioł-Milc, D.; Pieczyńska, J. Importance of Gut Microbiota in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Nutrients 2024, 16, 2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Boicean, A.; Birsan, S.; Ichim, C.; Boeras, I.; Roman-Filip, I.; Blanca, G.; Bacila, C.; Fleaca, R.S.; Dura, H.; Roman-Filip, C. Has-miR-129-5p’s Involvement in Different Disorders, from Digestive Cancer to Neurodegenerative Diseases. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xu, J.; Xu, W.; Xuan, Y.; Liu, Z.; Sun, Q.; Lan, C. Pancreatic Cancer Progression Is Regulated by IPO7/p53/LncRNA MALAT1/MiR-129-5p Positive Feedback Loop. Front. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 630262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Qiu, Z.; Wang, X.; Shi, Y.; Da, M. miR-129-5p suppresses proliferation, migration, and induces apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells by targeting PBX3. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2019, 51, 997–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kipkeeva, F.; Muzaffarova, T.; Korotaeva, A.; Nikulin, M.; Grishina, K.; Mansorunov, D.; Apanovich, P.; Karpukhin, A. MicroRNA in Gastric Cancer Development: Mechanisms and Biomarkers. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Long, H.Z.; Cheng, Y.; Zhou, Z.W.; Luo, H.Y.; Wen, D.D.; Gao, L.C. PI3K/AKT Signal Pathway: A Target of Natural Products in the Prevention and Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease and Parkinson’s Disease. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 648636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhao, X.; Hu, G.F.; Shi, Y.F.; Xu, W. Research progress in microRNA-based therapy for gastric cancer. OncoTargets Ther. 2019, 12, 11393–11411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Herrera-Pariente, C.; Montori, S.; Llach, J.; Bofill, A.; Albeniz, E.; Moreira, L. Biomarkers for Gastric Cancer Screening and Early Diagnosis. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bautista-Sánchez, D.; Arriaga-Canon, C.; Pedroza-Torres, A.; De La Rosa-Velázquez, I.A.; González-Barrios, R.; Contreras-Espinosa, L.; Montiel-Manríquez, R.; Castro-Hernández, C.; Fragoso-Ontiveros, V.; Álvarez-Gómez, R.M.; et al. The Promising Role of miR-21 as a Cancer Biomarker and Its Importance in RNA-Based Therapeutics. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2020, 20, 409–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Jiang, Z.; Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Hou, Z.; Ma, N.; Chen, W.; Zong, Z.; Chen, S. MiR-129-5p is down-regulated and involved in migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells by targeting interleukin-8. Neoplasma 2016, 63, 673–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chen, J.; Yuan, D.; Hao, Q.; Zhu, D.; Chen, Z. LncRNA PCGEM1 mediates oxaliplatin resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma via miR-129-5p/ETV1 axis in vitro. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2021, 30, 831–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Borody, T.J.; Paramsothy, S.; Agrawal, G. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: Indications, Methods, Evidence, and Future Directions. Curr. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2013, 15, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Papaconstantinou, I.; Kapizioni, C.; Legaki, E.; Xourgia, E.; Karamanolis, G.; Gklavas, A.; Gazouli, M. Association of miR-146 rs2910164, miR-196a rs11614913, miR-221 rs113054794 and miR-224 rs188519172 polymorphisms with anti-TNF treatment response in a Greek population with Crohn’s disease. World J. Gastrointest. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017, 8, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  30. Kim, J.M. Antimicrobial Proteins in Intestine and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Intestig. Res. 2014, 12, 20–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  31. Jalanka, J.; Cheng, J.; Hiippala, K.; Ritari, J.; Salojärvi, J.; Ruuska, T.; Kalliomäki, M.; Satokari, R. Colonic Mucosal Microbiota and Association of Bacterial Taxa with the Expression of Host Antimicrobial Peptides in Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Burisch, J.; Katsanos, K.H.; Christodoulou, D.K.; Barros, L.; Magro, F.; Pedersen, N.; Kjeldsen, J.; Vegh, Z.; Lakatos, P.L.; Eriksson, C.; et al. Natural Disease Course of Ulcerative Colitis During the First Five Years of Follow-up in a European Population-based Inception Cohort—An Epi-IBD Study. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2018, 13, 198–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Alatab, S.; Sepanlou, S.G.; Ikuta, K.; Vahedi, H.; Bisignano, C.; Safiri, S.; Sadeghi, A.; Nixon, M.R.; Abdoli, A.; Abolhassani, H.; et al. The global, regional, and national burden of inflammatory bowel disease in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 5, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. De Lange, K.M.; Moutsianas, L.; Lee, J.C.; Lamb, C.A.; Luo, Y.; Kennedy, N.A.; Jostins, L.; Rice, D.L.; Gutierrez-Achury, J.; Ji, S.; et al. Genome-wide association study implicates immune activation of multiple integrin genes in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Genet. 2017, 49, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Howell, K.J.; Kraiczy, J.; Nayak, K.M.; Gasparetto, M.; Ross, A.; Lee, C.; Mak, T.N.; Koo, B.-K.; Kumar, N.; Lawley, T.; et al. DNA Methylation and Transcription Patterns in Intestinal Epithelial Cells from Pediatric Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Differentiate Disease Subtypes and Associate With Outcome. Gastroenterology 2018, 154, 585–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kalliomäki, M.; Rajala, S.; Elamo, H.; Ashorn, M.; Ruuska, T. Increased expression of CXCL16, a bacterial scavenger receptor, in the colon of children with ulcerative colitis. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2014, 8, 1222–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ostaff, M.J.; Stange, E.F.; Wehkamp, J. Antimicrobial peptides and gut microbiota in homeostasis and pathology. EMBO Mol. Med. 2013, 5, 1465–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Stange, E.F.; Schroeder, B.O. Microbiota and mucosal defense in IBD: An update. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 13, 963–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Khor, B.; Gardet, A.; Xavier, R.J. Genetics and pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 2011, 474, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Krishnachaitanya, S.S.; Liu, M.; Fujise, K.; Li, Q. MicroRNAs in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Its Complications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  41. Ahmed, F.E.; Jeffries, C.D.; Vos, P.W.; Flake, G.; Nuovo, G.J.; Sinar, D.R.; Naziri, W.; Marcuard, S.P. Diagnostic microRNA markers for screening sporadic human colon cancer and active ulcerative colitis in stool and tissue. Proteom 2009, 6, 281–295. [Google Scholar]
  42. Lian, H.; Zhong, X.S.; Xiao, Y.; Sun, Z.; Shen, Y.; Zhao, K.; Ma, X.; Li, Y.; Niu, Q.; Liu, M.; et al. Exosomal miR-29b of Gut Origin in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Suppresses Heart Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2022, 9, 759689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Bayraktar, R.; Bertilaccio, M.T.S.; Calin, G.A. The Interaction Between Two Worlds: MicroRNAs and Toll-Like Receptors. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Guo, X.Y.; Liu, X.J.; Hao, J.Y. Gut microbiota in ulcerative colitis: Insights on pathogenesis and treatment. J. Dig. Dis. 2020, 21, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Rhee, S.H.; Hwang, D. Murine TOLL-like receptor 4 confers lipopolysaccharide responsiveness as determined by activation of NF kappa B and expression of the inducible cyclooxygenase. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 34035–34040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ando, Y.; Mazzurana, L.; Forkel, M.; Okazaki, K.; Aoi, M.; Schmidt, P.T.; Mjösberg, J.; Bresso, F. Downregulation of MicroRNA-21 in Colonic CD3+ T Cells in UC Remission. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2016, 22, 2788–2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Grillo, T.G.; Quaglio, A.E.V.; Beraldo, R.F.; Lima, T.B.; Baima, J.P.; Di Stasi, L.C.; Sassaki, L.Y. MicroRNA expression in inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal cancer. World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2021, 13, 995–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Boicean, A.; Boeras, I.; Birsan, S.; Ichim, C.; Todor, S.B.; Onisor, D.M.; Brusnic, O.; Bacila, C.; Dura, H.; Roman-Filip, C.; et al. In Pursuit of Novel Markers: Unraveling the Potential of miR-106, CEA and CA 19-9 in Gastric Adenocarcinoma Diagnosis and Staging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 7898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Chen, S.; Li, M.; Tong, C.; Wang, Y.; He, J.; Shao, Q.; Liu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Song, Y. Regulation of miRNA expression in the prefrontal cortex by fecal microbiota transplantation in anxiety-like mice. Front. Psychiatry 2024, 15, 1323801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Brusnic, O.; Onisor, D.; Boicean, A.; Hasegan, A.; Ichim, C.; Guzun, A.; Chicea, R.; Todor, S.B.; Vintila, B.I.; Anderco, P.; et al. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: Insights into Colon Carcinogenesis and Immune Regulation. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 6578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Arcas, V.C.; Fratila, A.M.; Moga, D.F.C.; Roman-Filip, I.; Arcas, A.-M.C.; Roman-Filip, C.; Sava, M. A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis on the Potential Use of miR-150 as a Novel Biomarker in the Detection and Progression of Multiple Sclerosis. J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14, 815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Caldeira, L.d.F.; Borba, H.H.; Tonin, F.S.; Wiens, A.; Fernandez-Llimos, F.; Pontarolo, R. Fecal microbiota transplantation in inflammatory bowel disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0238910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Boicean, A.; Birlutiu, V.; Ichim, C.; Anderco, P.; Birsan, S. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Boicean, A.; Bratu, D.; Fleaca, S.R.; Vasile, G.; Shelly, L.; Birsan, S.; Bacila, C.; Hasegan, A. Exploring the Potential of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation as a Therapy in Tuberculosis and Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Pathogens 2023, 12, 1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bocchetti, M.; Ferraro, M.G.; Ricciardiello, F.; Ottaiano, A.; Luce, A.; Cossu, A.M.; Scrima, M.; Leung, W.-Y.; Abate, M.; Stiuso, P.; et al. The Role of microRNAs in Development of Colitis-Associated Colorectal Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, S.; Yu, M.; Wang, X.; Fei, B. MiR-597-5p inhibits carcinogenesis and macrophage recruitment in colitis-related colorectal cancer via reducing the expression of CXCL5. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2023, 24, 2274122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Suri, K.; Bubier, J.A.; Wiles, M.V.; Shultz, L.D.; Amiji, M.M.; Hosur, V. Role of MicroRNA in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Clinical Evidence and the Development of Preclinical Animal Models. Cells 2021, 10, 2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Shibata, C.; Otsuka, M.; Kishikawa, T.; Yoshikawa, T.; Ohno, M.; Takata, A.; Koike, K. Current status of miRNA-targeting therapeutics and preclinical studies against gastroenterological carcinoma. Mol. Cell. Ther. 2013, 1, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zarimeidani, F.; Rahmati, R.; Mostafavi, M.; Darvishi, M.; Khodadadi, S.; Mohammadi, M.; Shamlou, F.; Bakhtiyari, S.; Alipourfard, I. Gut Microbiota and Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Neuroinflammatory Mediated Mechanism of Pathogenesis? Inflammation 2024, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Schaefer, J.S.; Attumi, T.; Opekun, A.R.; Abraham, B.; Hou, J.; Shelby, H.; Graham, D.Y.; Streckfus, C.; Klein, J.R. MicroRNA signatures differentiate Crohn’s disease from ulcerative colitis. BMC Immunol. 2015, 16, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Diez-Martin, E.; Hernandez-Suarez, L.; Muñoz-Villafranca, C.; Martin-Souto, L.; Astigarraga, E.; Ramirez-Garcia, A.; Barreda-Gómez, G. Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comprehensive Analysis of Molecular Bases, Predictive Biomarkers, Diagnostic Methods, and Therapeutic Options. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 7062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Boyapati, R.K.; Rossi, A.G.; Satsangi, J.; Ho, G.-T. Gut mucosal DAMPs in IBD: From mechanisms to therapeutic implications. Mucosal Immunol. 2016, 9, 567–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Nanini, H.F.; Bernardazzi, C.; Castro, F.; de Souza, H.S.P. Damage-associated molecular patterns in inflammatory bowel disease: From biomarkers to therapeutic targets. World J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 24, 4622–4634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Marafini, I.; Monteleone, G. Inflammatory bowel disease: New therapies from antisense oligonucleotides. Ann. Med. 2018, 50, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chen, K.; Lou, Y.; Zhu, Y. Tong Xie Yao Fang: A Classic Chinese Medicine Prescription with Potential for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. eCAM 2021, 2021, 5548764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Coskun, M.; Vermeire, S.; Nielsen, O.H. Novel Targeted Therapies for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2017, 38, 127–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Seyed Tabib, N.S.; Madgwick, M.; Sudhakar, P.; Verstockt, B.; Korcsmaros, T.; Vermeire, S. Big data in IBD: Big progress for clinical practice. Gut 2020, 69, 1520–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Ryan, F.J.; Ahern, A.M.; Fitzgerald, R.S.; Laserna-Mendieta, E.J.; Power, E.M.; Clooney, A.G.; O’donoghue, K.W.; McMurdie, P.J.; Iwai, S.; Crits-Christoph, A.; et al. Colonic microbiota is associated with inflammation and host epigenomic alterations in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Ng, S.C.; Shi, H.Y.; Hamidi, N.; Underwood, F.E.; Tang, W.; Benchimol, E.I.; Panaccione, R.; Ghosh, S.; Wu, J.C.Y.; Chan, F.K.L.; et al. Worldwide incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in the 21st century: A systematic review of population-based studies. Lancet 2018, 390, 2769–2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Kobayashi, T.; Siegmund, B.; Le Berre, C.; Wei, S.C.; Ferrante, M.; Shen, B.; Bernstein, C.N.; Danese, S.; Peyrin-Biroulet, L.; Hibi, T. Ulcerative colitis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2020, 6, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Rahman, A.; Fahlgren, A.; Sundstedt, C.; Hammarström, S.; Danielsson, A.; Hammarström, M.L. Chronic colitis induces expression of β-defensins in murine intestinal epithelial cells. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2011, 163, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. de Oliveira, E.C.S.; Quaglio, A.E.V.; Magro, D.O.; Di Stasi, L.C.; Sassaki, L.Y. Intestinal Microbiota and miRNA in IBD: A Narrative Review about Discoveries and Perspectives for the Future. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  73. Berding, K.; Donovan, S.M. Microbiome and nutrition in autism spectrum disorder: Current knowledge and research needs. Nutr. Rev. 2016, 74, 723–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Dhuppar, S.; Murugaiyan, G. miRNA effects on gut homeostasis: Therapeutic implications for inflammatory bowel disease. Trends Immunol. 2022, 43, 917–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ye, D.; Guo, S.; Al–Sadi, R.; Ma, T.Y. MicroRNA Regulation of Intestinal Epithelial Tight Junction Permeability. Gastroenterology 2011, 141, 1323–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Viennois, E.; Chassaing, B.; Tahsin, A.; Pujada, A.; Wang, L.; Gewirtz, A.T.; Merlin, D. Host-derived fecal microRNAs can indicate gut microbiota healthiness and ability to induce inflammation. Theranostics 2019, 9, 4542–4557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  77. Li, Q.; Zhou, J.-M. The microbiota–gut–brain axis and its potential therapeutic role in autism spectrum disorder. Neuroscience 2016, 324, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Gaytán-Pacheco, N.; Ibáñez-Salazar, A.; Herrera-Van Oostdam, A.S.; Oropeza-Valdez, J.J.; Magaña-Aquino, M.; Adrián López, J.; Monárrez-Espino, J.; López-Hernández, Y. miR-146a, miR-221, and miR-155 are Involved in Inflammatory Immune Response in Severe COVID-19 Patients. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chen, J.; Vitetta, L. Is miR-223 Upregulation in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases a Protective Response? Front. Biosci. 2023, 15, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Pan, Y.; Wang, D.; Liu, F. miR-146b suppresses LPS-induced M1 macrophage polarization via inhibiting the FGL2-activated NF-κB/MAPK signaling pathway in inflammatory bowel disease. Clinics 2022, 77, 100069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  81. Singh, U.P.; Murphy, A.E.; Enos, R.T.; Shamran, H.A.; Singh, N.P.; Guan, H.; Hegde, V.L.; Fan, D.; Price, R.L.; Taub, D.D.; et al. miR-155 deficiency protects mice from experimental colitis by reducing T helper type 1/type 17 responses. Immunology 2014, 143, 478–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  82. Eken, A.; Singh, A.K.; Oukka, M. Interleukin 23 in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2014, 20, 587–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  83. Kamba, A.; Lee, I.-A.; Mizoguchi, E. Potential Association Between TLR4 and Chitinase 3-Like 1 (CHI3L1/YKL-40) Signaling on Colonic Epithelial Cells in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Colitis-Associated Cancer. Curr. Mol. Med. 2013, 13, 1110–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  84. Boicean, A.; Neamtu, B.; Birsan, S.; Batar, F.; Tanasescu, C.; Dura, H.; Roman, M.D.; Hașegan, A.; Bratu, D.; Mihetiu, A.; et al. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Patients Co-Infected with SARS-CoV2 and Clostridioides difficile. Biomedicines 2022, 11, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. How AMPs and miRNAs regulate immune responses, inflammation, and gut homeostasis.
Table 1. How AMPs and miRNAs regulate immune responses, inflammation, and gut homeostasis.
AMPmiRNAInterplay MechanismRole in IBD
LL-37miR-21
[77]
miR-21 modulates LL-37 expression, affecting inflammation levelsHigh levels of miR-21 correlate with reduced AMP function, leading to elevated inflammation
DefensinsmiR-146a
[78]
miR-146a controls the immune response and can upregulate defensinsDefensins help maintain intestinal barrier, while miR-146a limits excessive inflammation
HBD-2miR-155
[78]
miR-155 affects HBD-2 expression, enhancing inflammatory response when overexpressedElevated miR-155 correlates with increased inflammation and impaired AMP response
RegIIIγmiR-223
[79]
miR-223 regulates neutrophil function and maintains gut barrier by modulating RegIIIγBalances immune response, supporting AMP activity in intestinal integrity
CathelicidinsmiR-122
[77]
miR-122 downregulation supports cathelicidin function in inflammationCathelicidins protect against pathogens, while miR-122 modulation reduces fibrosis
Table 2. Highlights of key miRNAs, their target genes, or pathways.
Table 2. Highlights of key miRNAs, their target genes, or pathways.
miRNAAssociated with IBD TypeTarget Genes/PathwaysRole in IBD
miR-21Crohn’s Disease (CD), Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
[81,82,83]
PDCD4, TLR4, STAT3, IL-23Promotes inflammation by enhancing proinflammatory cytokines, involved in immune response and epithelial integrity.
miR-155CD, UC
[81,82,83]
SHIP1, SOCS1Enhances inflammation by modulating immune cell activation and cytokine production. Overexpressed in active IBD.
miR-223CD, UC
[71,81]
NLRP3, IL-1βRegulates inflammation by modulating IL-1β and IL-6; contributes to intestinal barrier maintenance.
miR-146aCD, UC
[77,78,79,80,81]
TRAF6, IRAK1, NF-κBAnti-inflammatory role by targeting NF-κB pathway components, regulates cytokine release in immune cells.
miR-31CD
[77]
Multiple targets, epithelial integrityAssociated with gut epithelial integrity and fibrosis regulation in the intestines. Increased in active disease.
miR-122UC
[77,78,79,80,81]
MUC1Implicated in mucus layer maintenance; regulates epithelial cell differentiation and mucus production.
miR-124UC
[77,78,79,80,81]
STAT3, IL-6, TNF-αAnti-inflammatory effects by targeting STAT3 and cytokine production pathways.
miR-375UC
[77,78,79,80,81]
JAK2/STAT3Anti-inflammatory; regulates immune response and epithelial healing. Downregulated in active disease.
miR-199aCD
[77,78,79,80,81]
NF-κB pathwayReduces intestinal inflammation by targeting NF-κB pathway, involved in immune modulation.
miR-150CD, UC
[77,78,79,80,81]
c-Myb, AKTRegulates immune cell function, particularly T-cell responses; associated with inflammation.
miR-29aUC
[77,84]
IL-6, TNF-α, STAT3Reduces proinflammatory cytokine production; potential biomarker for UC severity.
miR-192UC
[84]
TGF-β pathwayAnti-inflammatory, contributes to maintaining intestinal epithelial function.
miR-10aCD, UC
[77]
IL-12/IL-23, NF-κBModulates immune response, decreases proinflammatory cytokine production.
miR-26aCD
[77,84]
IL-6, IL-8Downregulated in CD; linked to immune modulation and epithelial repair.
Table 3. Therapeutic strategy in IBD.
Table 3. Therapeutic strategy in IBD.
miRNARole in IBD PathogenesisTherapeutic StrategyFindings
miR-21Upregulated in IBD, promotes inflammation via immune response regulation
[77,84]
Inhibition of miR-21Reduction in intestinal inflammation, restoration of immune balance
miR-155Involved in proinflammatory pathways, particularly in macrophages
[71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84]
Inhibition of miR-155Decreased production of proinflammatory cytokines, improved tissue repair
miR-146aRegulates immune response and inflammation, often downregulated in IBD
[77,84]
Upregulation via mimicsReduction in inflammation, enhanced immune regulation
miR-122Known for its role in liver function but found relevant in gut inflammation
[84]
Targeted inhibitionReduced fibrosis, improved inflammation response
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Brusnic, O.; Boicean, A.; Fleacă, S.-R.; Grama, B.; Sofonea, F.; Roman-Filip, C.; Roman-Filip, I.; Solomon, A.; Bîrsan, S.; Dura, H.; et al. Importance of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation and Molecular Regulation as Therapeutic Strategies in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Nutrients 2024, 16, 4411. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16244411

AMA Style

Brusnic O, Boicean A, Fleacă S-R, Grama B, Sofonea F, Roman-Filip C, Roman-Filip I, Solomon A, Bîrsan S, Dura H, et al. Importance of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation and Molecular Regulation as Therapeutic Strategies in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Nutrients. 2024; 16(24):4411. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16244411

Chicago/Turabian Style

Brusnic, Olga, Adrian Boicean, Sorin-Radu Fleacă, Blanca Grama, Florin Sofonea, Corina Roman-Filip, Iulian Roman-Filip, Adelaida Solomon, Sabrina Bîrsan, Horatiu Dura, and et al. 2024. "Importance of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation and Molecular Regulation as Therapeutic Strategies in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases" Nutrients 16, no. 24: 4411. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16244411

APA Style

Brusnic, O., Boicean, A., Fleacă, S.-R., Grama, B., Sofonea, F., Roman-Filip, C., Roman-Filip, I., Solomon, A., Bîrsan, S., Dura, H., Porr, C., Adrian, C., & Onisor, D. M. (2024). Importance of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation and Molecular Regulation as Therapeutic Strategies in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Nutrients, 16(24), 4411. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16244411

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop