Next Article in Journal
Reduction in Hypercalcemia Following Readjustment of Target Serum 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D Concentration during Cholecalciferol Therapy in Vitamin D-Deficient Critically Ill Patients
Next Article in Special Issue
Vitamin D, the Vitamin D Receptor, Calcitriol Analogues and Their Link with Ocular Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
The Dose-Response Effects of Consuming High Fructose Corn Syrup-Sweetened Beverages on Hepatic Lipid Content and Insulin Sensitivity in Young Adults
Previous Article in Special Issue
Elimination of Vitamin D Signaling Causes Increased Mortality in a Model of Overactivation of the Insulin Receptor: Role of Lipid Metabolism
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 14
Issue 8
10.3390/nu14081649
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Effects of Vitamin D on Fertility, Pregnancy and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome—A Review

by
Szabolcs Várbíró
1,2,
István Takács
3,
László Tűű
4,
Katalin Nas
4,
Réka Eszter Sziva
1,2,5,*,
Judit Réka Hetthéssy
2 and
Marianna Török
1,2
1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis University, Üllői Street 78/a, 1082 Budapest, Hungary
2
Workgroup of Research Management, Doctoral School, Semmelweis University, Üllői Street 22, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
3
Department of Internal Medicine and Oncology, Semmelweis University, Sándor Korányi Street 2/a, 1098 Budapest, Hungary
4
EndoCare Institute, Endocrinology Center, Bokor Street 17-21, 1037 Budapest, Hungary
5
Department of Physiology, Semmelweis University, Tűzoltó Street 37-47, 1094 Budapest, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(8), 1649; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14081649
Submission received: 16 March 2022 / Revised: 9 April 2022 / Accepted: 11 April 2022 / Published: 15 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vitamin D Receptor in Human Health and Disease)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common endocrine reproductive disorders in women. Vitamin D deficiency is also quite common in this condition. The degree of vitamin D deficiency correlates with the severity of PCOS. Both male and female vitamin D levels play a role in fertility and affect the outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Moreover, fertility and IVF indicators are improved by vitamin D not only in healthy women but in those diagnosed with PCOS. Both vitamin D deficiency and PCOS increase pregnancy-related complications. Vitamin D supplementation and optimal vitamin D levels decrease both maternal and fetal risk for complications and adverse events. Furthermore, vitamin D supplementation may ameliorate or even prevent pregnancy-related reversible bone loss in mothers. This review emphasizes the roles of vitamin D deficiency and vitamin D supplementation and their correlation with PCOS regarding reproductive health.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common endocrinological conditions in reproductive-age women. PCOS decreases the chances of conception and increases the risk of complications during pregnancy. This syndrome in often accompanied by vitamin D deficiency, which occurs in 67–85% of cases [1]. Several studies have shown that vitamin D deficiency is linked to chronic diseases, such as endocrinological or tumorous conditions and autoimmune diseases among others [2,3]. It has also been described that adequate vitamin D supplementation may improve the condition of these patients [4]. Vitamin D interacts with the epigenome on multiple levels—this regulates approximately 3% of the human genome [5]. Critical genes in the vitamin signaling system have large cytosines followed by guanine (CpG) islands—these influence DNA methylation [6,7,8]. The vitamin D receptor (VDR) interacts with numerous co-activator and co-repressor proteins, while chromatin modifiers and remodelers are VDR and related ligand targets [9]. Alterations in DNA methylation lead to both aberrant gene expression genomic integrity disruptions, resulting in the development and progression of several diseases. Vitamin D is involved in regulating epigenetic processes and is in turn regulated by epigenetic mechanisms [6]. The epigenetic modifications themselves are reversible via the CYP2R1 microsomal 450 enzyme, which is hydroxylated at position C-25 in D2 and D3. When vitamin D levels are low, the 25-hydroxylase CYP2R1 promoter may be methylated. This process may be reversed by vitamin D supplementation [6,10]. One of the numerous biomarkers for determining biological age is DNA methylation age—marking deviation from chronological age with DNAm (age acceleration—DNAmAA) [11,12]. DNAmAA was found to be 2.6 years lower in those who were vitamin D deficient before but received vitamin D supplementation compared to those without supplementation [13]. Obesity, PCOS and pregnancy increase vitamin D demand; thus, vitamin D deficiency is more common and more severe in these conditions compared to healthy individuals [14,15]. The results of the current research have shown that vitamin D plays a role in both male and female fertility; therefore, it is of paramount importance to keep vitamin D levels in the optimum range in case of fertility-related conditions, i.e., PCOS. In our current study, we summarize the current knowledge of the effects of vitamin D on fertility, pregnancy and pregnancy-related complications in PCOS and other gynecological conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

In this review, we provide an overview of the potential roles of vitamin D in fertility, in in vitro fertilization (IVF), and in pregnancy in healthy and PCOS women. We also analyze the possible influence on certain bone-related obstetric–gynecological conditions. This work is based on analysis of the literature—a PubMed search up to September 2021 using at least one of the following search terms: vitamin D, vitamin D deficiency, polycystic ovarian syndrome, PCOS, fertility, in vitro fertilization, pregnancy, pregnancy complications. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses and review articles were included in our research. To complement our article base, we also added select relevant articles from the references of these articles and publications used in our previous work. Animal studies were also discussed if they were deemed relevant. We did not limit our research to specific results but aimed to provide an up-to-date overview of the effects of vitamin D deficiency and supplementation on fertility, IVF, and pregnancy in healthy and PCOS subjects. We also summarize recommendations for the clinical management of vitamin D treatment.

3. Influence of Vitamin D on Fertility and In Vitro Fertilization

The key role of vitamin D regarding fertility is emphasized by the fact that vitamin D receptors (VDRs) present in both male and female central and peripheral reproductive organs, tissues and cells. VDRs are also found in the hypothalamus, the hypophysis, in the ovaries, granulosa cells, the endometrium, the placenta, the decidua and in the testes and the cells of spermatogenesis in men [3,16]. The Pit-1 gene in the hypothalamus carries a VDR promoter, which plays a significant role in the development of the anterior hypophysis and the activation of both growth hormone (GH) and the prolactin gene [17]. Increasing the production of ovarian steroid hormones—progesterone, estradiol and estrone—and follicular stimulation hormone (FSH) receptor genes, as well as follicular maturation and selection are some of the physiological effects of vitamin D [18]. Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels—which are good indicators of ovarian function—also correlate with vitamin D levels and accordingly show seasonal changes: AMH level decreases by 18% in the winter compared to summer values; the change in AMH level correlates with the magnitude of change in initial AMH and vitamin D levels [19]. These changes are similar to those seen regarding pregnancy rates [20].
Animal experiments demonstrate that vitamin D plays an important role in both male and female reproductive functions. Reproductive function was damaged in various ways in VDR-knockout females: uterine hypoplasia, decreased aromatase activity and aromatase gene expression occurred. Serum luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicular stimulation hormone (FSH) levels were increased, meaning that the primary damage appeared in peripheral tissues (i.e., hypergonadotropic hypogonadism) [17,21]. Similar to female VDR-knockout mice, reproductive functions were also impaired in males: lower sperm count, motility and histological abnormalities in the testes were observed, while testosterone levels remained physiological [17,21]. The results of human studies showed similarities to animal experiments, as males with sufficient vitamin D levels have better spermiogram results than men with vitamin D deficiency (levels below 20 ng/mL). More fertile men demonstrated higher vitamin D levels (21 ± 10 vs. 16 ± 9 ng/mL) [22]. In the case of males, vitamin D may have an age-dependent effect on testosterone. There is no correlation between testosterone, LH and vitamin D levels in young adolescents, while in older men, a positive association was found between vitamin D and testosterone levels [17]. Maternal vitamin D level has an effect on the selection of the ‘best sperm’ during the fertilization process, facilitating appropriate capacitation, hyperactivation and acrosomal reaction. However, paternal vitamin D levels do not have an effect on these processes, as there is no vitamin D present in the semen [23].
Vitamin D level influences the outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) independently from age, body mass index (BMI), ethnicity and the number of embryo transfers [17,24]. Vitamin D levels correlate strongly with success rates (r = 0.94); every nmol/L increase in the vitamin D content of the follicular fluid increases the probability of clinical pregnancy by 2.4% [24]. Vitamin D increases the survival of the preantral follicle, sustains AMH production and enhances the growth of the antral follicle [25]. It also affects the length of telomeres and telomerase enzyme activity, thereby decreasing the aneuploid ratio and improving the efficacy of IVF treatment [16].
In summary (Table 1), we may state that optimal vitamin D levels in both males and females play an important role in fertility and the outcomes of IVF.

4. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Vitamin D Deficiency

Prevalence of PCOS is 5–20% in reproductive-aged women [26]. Differences in diagnostic criteria contribute to a wide range of prevalence values: prevalence based on the National Institute of Health (NIH) criteria, 8.7 ± 2.0%; according to Rotterdam criteria, 17.8 ± 2.8%; while prevalence is 12.0 ± 2.4% based on the criteria of the Androgen Excess Society (AES) [27]. PCOS—characterized by clinical and/or biochemical hyperandrogenism, menstrual disorders such as oligomenorrhea/amenorrhea and ovarian dysfunction, polycystic ovary morphology—is one of the most frequent reasons of infertility among reproductive-aged women [28]. The root cause of PCOS has not yet been established; it is now considered to be multifactorial where both genetic and environmental factors play a role. There is cumulative evidence suggesting that insulin resistance also plays a key role [29,30]. As we mentioned above, vitamin D deficiency is quite common in this patient group (67–85%) and may appear in a more severe form although the single-nucleotide polymorphism (Apa I, VDR Fok I, Taq I) of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) does not correlate with the risk of developing PCOS or with the severity of the disease [31,32]. Vitamin D status in PCOS is linked to reproductive function, metabolic alterations and mental health [33].
Vitamin D therapy decreases serum androgen and AMH levels in PCOS patients, and it decreases endometrial thickness [34]. In combination, they have positive effects on menstrual cycle and on folliculogenesis [33]. Menstrual irregularities such as oligomenorrhea and amenorrhea are quite common in PCOS (found in 38% of the cases) [27]. Ninety percent of patients suffering from amenorrhea are diagnosed with PCOS [35]. The probability of ovulation correlates with vitamin D levels in PCOS, showing 68% probability below levels of 20 ng/mL, 77% between 20–30 ng/mL, and 78% above 30 ng/mL [28]. Pathologies appear not only in the ovaries of PCOS patients, but in the uterus as well. In animal models, the endometrium, epithelium and stroma were all pathologically thickened, and the thickening was accompanied by increased proliferation and apoptosis. As a result of vitamin D supplementation (weekly doses of 120 ng 1,25(OH)2-vitamin D/100 g in a rat model), the thickness of the endometrium and the stroma decreased significantly as did the degree of pathological proliferation and apoptosis [34]. Pathological endometrial structure hinders implantation, while the improved structures induced by vitamin D supplementation facilitate implantation, thereby enhancing fertility indicators. Vitamin D effects endometrial receptivity: women demonstrating increased VDR expression in the endometrium, especially during the implantation of the embryo, were more likely to become pregnant than their counterparts with decreased VDR expression [36]. Endometrial receptivity improved as a consequence of vitamin D supplementation in PCOS patients as well [37].
VDR expression of the granulosa cells and vitamin D content of the follicular fluid are decreased in PCOS, which also suggests that vitamin D supplementation may aid the treatment of infertility in PCOS [38]. In a recent publication, IVF treatment of women suffering from PCOS was complimented with vitamin D supplementation. It was found that both implantation and occurrence of clinical pregnancy were significantly higher in patients with normal vitamin D levels compared to those with decreased levels of vitamin D (<20 ng/mL 25(OH)-vitamin D); vitamin D levels correlate strongly with the likelihood of implantation and clinical pregnancy (p < 0.01); they improve embryo quality—the number of high-quality embryos following vitamin D treatment equals that occurring in women with normal vitamin D levels [39].
Insulin resistance may be responsible for the higher rate of miscarriages in PCOS [38,40,41,42]. Vitamin D supplementation improves insulin resistance [3,43,44,45,46] and the quality of embryos, therefore leading to a higher ratio of clinical pregnancies in PCOS [39].
Following ovulation–induction treatment, a lower ratio of live births was found in PCOS patients with low vitamin D levels (25(OH)-vitamin D < 75 nmol/L); live births were lower by 44% (OR: 0.58). This ratio improved markedly following adequate vitamin D supplementation (in case of levels > 95 nmol/L OR: 1.42; in case of levels > 100 nmol/L OR: 1.51; in case of levels > 112.5 nmol/L OR: 4.46). For every 2.5 nmol/L increase in vitamin D levels, the ratio of live births increased by 2% [28].
A possible underlying cause for the varied detrimental effects of vitamin D deficiency may be the link between vitamin D and the glucocorticoid system. During pregnancy, glucocorticoid levels rise physiologically as they help adapt maternal metabolism. However, overexaggerated glucocorticoid exposition has severe disadvantageous effects on the embryo, leading to placental dysfunction and impaired embryonic growth. It may also lead to an increased risk of cardiovascular and neuropsychiatric diseases in adulthood. Both the placenta and embryonic tissues benefit from glucocorticoid exposition to a certain extent. The enzyme responsible for glucocorticoid degradation decreases in vitamin D deficiency. In a mouse experimental model, vitamin D affected maternal glucocorticoid levels, and deficiency led to an increase in circulating cortisol levels: an increase in the size of adrenal glands—marking the chronic activation of the adrenal gland–hypophysis–hypothalamus axis—may lead to the elevation of embryonic glucocorticoids [47].
The effects of vitamin D may also be explained by immunomodulatory effects, and this may be key. The following alterations may be observed in vitamin D deficiency: Th2 cytokine dominance instead of Th1 and decreased proliferation of inflammatory cytokines [48]. Vitamin D inhibits the production of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), and increases the production of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in in vitro trophoblast experiments [49]. Its anti-inflammatory activity was demonstrated in trophoblast cultures contaminated by Escherichia coli bacteria—it showed antibacterial effects [47,50].
In summary (Table 2), we may state that Vitamin D deficiency correlates with the severity of PCOS. Fertility and IVF indicators are improved by vitamin D not only in healthy women but in those diagnosed with PCOS, which is important because vitamin D deficiency is both frequent and significant in this patient group.

5. Vitamin D Deficiency and Pregnancy

Vitamin D demand increases in pregnancy, 70% of pregnant women suffer from vitamin D deficiency, 21% from vitamin D deficit and only 7.3% show sufficient levels of vitamin D [51]. Vitamin D has effects on decidualization, implantation, expression of human placental lactogen (hPL), secretion of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), progesterone and estrogen levels, calcium-uptake in the placenta and the immune responses of the placenta [52]. The risk of individual complications may be increased by PCOS and vitamin D deficiency both independently and linked, while this risk may be decreased by optimal vitamin D levels (>75 nmol/L).
Vitamin D levels have been implemented in most pregnancy-related complications. Vitamin D levels measured in the first trimester (10.1 ng/mL vs. 15.7 ng/mL) correlate with gestational diabetes (GDM) diagnosed later-on during pregnancy in the 24th–26th gestational weeks, independently from conventional risk factors (history of GDM, obesity). A significantly higher percentage of patients with established GDM came from the vitamin D deficiency group, versus the group where vitamin D levels were above 75 nmol/L (87.1% vs. 68.7%) [53,54]. Preeclampsia shows seasonal fluctuation with higher incidences in the winter versus the summer [55], which correlates with the seasonal variability of vitamin D levels. A recent review and meta-analysis confirmed that higher levels of vitamin D during pregnancy were associated with decreased risk of preeclampsia, but further well-designed clinical studies are needed to better explore and define the associations [56,57]. However, a number of large-scale observational studies did not confirm the effects of vitamin D on preeclampsia, and previous studies showed that the risk of preeclampsia does not increase in vitamin D deficiency in healthy pregnant women [58]. Vitamin D enhances Th2-dominance and decreases the expression of certain placental vascular genes (soluble Fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase-1 (sFLT-1 vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)), the elevated levels of which have an association with preeclampsia. These factors may play a role in the presumed protective effect of vitamin D [55,59]. Furthermore, vitamin D deficiency is associated with habitual abortion [60,61], and it is more common in women suffering from infertility compared to the normal population [62]. Vitamin D inhibits inflammatory cytokine function (interleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon gamma (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) may also be key points [63]. Vitamin D levels below 50 nmol/L are associated with an increased risk of miscarriages; however, this correlation was not found in the second trimester [64].
Bacterial vaginosis is often symptom-free; however, it may increase the risk of a variety of complications such as pelvic inflammation, infertility, spontaneous miscarriages and premature births in pregnancy. An inverse association was found between bacterial vaginosis and 25(OH)-vitamin D levels in pregnancy, the risk of bacterial vaginosis increasing in case of vitamin D deficiency [65].
Adequate maternal vitamin D supply has effects not only on fertility and pregnancy complications, but on embryonic complications and the life-long health of the child. Embryonic vitamin D deficiency is partially counterbalanced by the alteration of vitamin D levels during pregnancy as the amount of active vitamin D multiplies independent of calcium, phosphate or parathormone levels [66]. Despite this, a more significant decrease in maternal vitamin D is associated with embryonic complications. The risk of spontaneous premature births increases in maternal vitamin D deficiency. Underlying reasons may include bacterial vaginosis and the fact that vitamin D decreases the production of inflammatory cytokines—as inhibition is blocked and the risk of chorioamnionitis increases as well [55]. The risk of premature birth decreases by 60% when vitamin D levels are above 40 ng/mL [67]. In-utero-experienced vitamin D deficiency increases the risk of juvenile asthma, schizophrenia, sclerosis multiplex, Type 1 diabetes and insulin resistance [52,55]. The risk of Type 2 diabetes increases 1,5-2-fold in children born under vitamin D-deficient conditions, while maternal risk is far greater (especially following GDM) [55]. A recent systematic review confirmed the following hypothesis: during pregnancy, maternal vitamin D deficiency may contribute to the development of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) [68].
The placenta plays a cardinal role in the development of most pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), preterm birth, or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The pathomechanisms in the placenta are the result of a wide variety of processes such as oxidative–nitrative stress, vascular malformation, impaired trophoblast invasion, proinflammatory cytokines and the effects of angiogenic growth factors (specifically Placental growth factor (PlGF) and sFlt-1) [69,70,71]. Vitamin D also exerts its protective role regarding pregnancy complications via the placenta. VDR expression of the placenta was decreased in intrauterine retardation [72]. Expression of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)—serving as a nutritional sensor of the placenta—decreased in VDR knockout mice as well, which had a key effect on embryonic development [73,74]. Furthermore, the expression of amino-acid transporter genes connected to embryonic development also correlates with maternal vitamin D and vitamin-D-binding protein levels. It seems that vitamin D plays a relevant role in the placental transportation of amino acids to the embryo [75]. In case of preeclampsia, the protective effects of vitamin D are multifold. Vitamin D maintains endothelial function by improving proliferation, migration and tubular formation. Vitamin D affects the placenta, placental invasion, implantation and angiogenesis. It also reduces the rate of oxidative stress in the placenta [76,77]. Vitamin D treatment on human fetal endothelial colony-forming cells restored preeclampsia or hypoxia damage via capillary-tube formation and the enhancement of the migration of fetal endothelial colony-forming cells [77]. However, the protective effects of vitamin D regarding preeclampsia are realized not only through the placenta but also through systemic effects. This is especially true in cases of late-onset placental-mediated complications [77]. Regarding preterm birth, the protective effects of vitamin D via the placenta have also been observed. There is an association between the Fok-l and Cdx-2 polymorphism of the VDR gene and spontaneous preterm birth, suggesting that they are involved in the induction of these syndromes [78]. Furthermore, vitamin D may reduce the risk of preterm birth by regulating corticotropin-releasing hormone and other mediators of labor in human syncytiotrophoblasts [79]. Concomitant GDM and vitamin D deficiency increase placental VDR protein and mRNA levels in placental and umbilical cord blood samples [80,81]. Increased expression of the CYP24A1 protein and mRNA—responsible for vitamin D catabolism—is also observed in GDM, which may contribute to the commonality of vitamin D deficiency in GDM [80]. VDR expression is regulated in a bimodal fashion by calcitriol: high doses (0.1 and 1 nmol/mL) lead to downregulation, while low doses (0.01 nmol/mL) lead to VDR upregulation [81]. Vitamin D has a reducing effect on inflammation in the placenta in GDM. Furthermore, in GDM placentas, the bioavailability of VDR-D3 complex increases as a compensatory mechanism [82].
Vitamin D supply of newborns is strongly dependent on maternal vitamin D supplies, and without external supplementation, breast milk is the only source of vitamin D during this period. During breastfeeding, amounts over 4000 IU of maternal vitamin D supplementation lead to a similar increase in 25(OH)-vitamin D levels of the feeding infant as external supplementation [83,84].
There is an inverse association between the need for a primary cesarean section and vitamin D status. Women with severe vitamin D deficiency (25(OH)-vitamin D levels <37.5 nmol/L) delivered almost four times as often by cesarean section as those with 37.5 nmol/L or greater levels (OR 3.48) [55,85].
Maternal vitamin D supplementation has a positive effect on birth weight, and it reduced the risk of low birth weight and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) births [86,87]. Furthermore, maternal vitamin D status has an early prenatal effect on fetal skeletal development with a lasting postnatal effect [88,89].
In summary (Table 3), vitamin D deficiency may have the following effects on pregnancy: increased risk for preeclampsia, GDM, spontaneous premature birth and bacterial vaginosis. We may also conclude that vitamin D demand increases in pregnancy: optimal vitamin D levels decrease both maternal and fetal risks.

6. Vitamin D Deficiency and Female Bone Mineral Density (BMD) in Childbearing Period and Pregnancy-Related Transient Osteoporosis of the Hip

Another interesting question: do low vitamin D levels influence bone mineral density (BMD) in women at different life periods (e.g., childhood, adolescence, reproductive age, pregnancy, postpartum, menopause), especially during the childbearing years: reproductive age, pregnancy and postpartum puerperium (Table 4)? Unfortunately, there are few studies that investigated the BMD of pregnant and/or postpartum lactating women [90]. Møller UK et al. investigated women’s BMD during pre-pregnancy and pregnancy (in the first, second and third trimesters) and in postpartum. They found that the lumbar spine, total hip, whole body and ultra-distal forearm BMDs decreased significantly during pregnancy; additionally, postpartum BMD decreased further (this may be due to breastfeeding), despite the fact that during pregnancy and postpartum, women had higher daily total intakes of vitamin D compared to controls, although adjustment to vitamin D intake did not change the BMD results. Nineteen months after delivery, BMD did not differ from pre-pregnancy levels, which indicates that pregnancy and breastfeeding may lead to reversible bone loss [91]. Ó Breasail M et al. studied 30–45-year-old healthy pregnant and non-pregnant non-lactating women; their volumetric BMDs (vBMD) in the tibia and the radius were measured with peripheral and high-resolution quantitative CT (pQCT and HR-pQCT) during the 14th–16th and 34th–36th gestational weeks. A significant decrease in vBMD and a different microarchitectural pattern were mainly found in the tibia, but not in the radius in the pregnant group. These results point to a compartment-specific maternal BMD and microarchitectural changes during pregnancy [92]. However, in these studies, 25(OH)-vitamin D levels were not measured; thus, the exact vitamin D supply categories (optimal/suboptimal/deficient) during the investigated period (pre-pregnancy, pregnancy and postpartum) are unknown. MAVIDOS, the MAternal VItamin D Osteoporosis Study—among other things—investigated a maternal bone resorption marker (urinary C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen/CTX), 25(OH)-vitamin D levels and the effects of gestational vitamin D supplementation (1000 IU/day) on resorption markers and BMD during pregnancy [93]. During the initial 14 weeks of gestation, there was no difference between the 25(OH)-vitamin D levels in the two groups (in nmol/L: placebo group, 44.1 ± 16.1; vitamin-D-supplemented group, 45.0 ± 16.3); however, these values indicate vitamin D deficiency (<50 nmol/L or <20 ng/mL) in both pregnant groups [94,95,96,97]. At 34 gestational weeks, maternal 25(OH)-vitamin D levels were significantly higher in the supplemented group compared to controls (in nmol/L: placebo group, 42.5 ± 20.6; vitamin-D-supplemented group: 66.0 ± 20.4). However, according to the numbers, 1000 IU/day vitamin D supplementation of the pregnant women resulted in only suboptimal (50–75 mmol/L or 20–30 ng/mL) and not optimal (75–125 nmol/L or 30–50 ng/mL) [94,95,96,97] vitamin D status. They observed that CTX showed a two-fold increase from 14 to 34 gestational weeks showing bone resorption in both groups, although this increase was lower in the vitamin-D-supplemented group compared to the placebo group [93]. These results may indicate that vitamin D supplementation may ameliorate and may prevent pregnancy-related reversible bone loss in mothers. In the current literature, there are virtually no human clinical studies that investigate the possible associations between vitamin D deficiency, BMD changes and female fertility and pregnancy. Therefore, further basic and clinical research are needed to explore and map possible connections.
Pregnancy-related transient osteoporosis of the hip (PR-TOH) [98,99] is a rare, benign orthopedic-obstetrical illness; it usually occurs during the third trimester of pregnancy. Although the exact pathophysiology of PR-TOH is still unknown, it is characterized by the appearance of sudden pain in the groin region, the anterior thigh and gluteal area. It may be uni- or bilateral, it may complicate natural vaginal birth, and it may be a non-obstetric indication to perform a cesarean section [98]. It may also be assumed that vitamin D may play a potential role in the pathomechanism of this disease, as the classic skeletal effects of vitamin D on calcium and phosphate homeostasis and bone turnover-metabolism are well known and documented [100]. In addition, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in pregnancy is markedly high and is observed to occur on a wide spectrum (8–70%) [101]. Moreover, the content of dietary vitamin–mineral preparations/supplements for pregnant women often vary and do not follow the latest expert recommendations [102]; thus, the dosage may often be inadequate. Therefore, adequate vitamin D supplementation from conception to birth and in postpartum is increasingly important both for the mother and newborn, although currently there are no uniform professional recommendations regarding the exact amount of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy [103].
Table
Table 4. Vitamin D deficiency and bone density in fertile women and pregnancy-related transient osteoporosis of the hip.
Table 4. Vitamin D deficiency and bone density in fertile women and pregnancy-related transient osteoporosis of the hip.
StudyArticle TypeStudy GroupSummary
Ó Breasail et al. [92]Case control studyHealthy pregnant women
(n = 53), non-pregnant and non-lactating (n = 37)		Significant decrease in volumetric bone mineral density and a different pattern of microarchitecture were seen mainly in the tibia (not in radius) in the pregnant group, suggesting compartment-specific maternal bone mineral density and microarchitecture changes during pregnancy.
Moller et al. [91]Controlled cohort studyWomen planning pregnancy
(in total 153 women, conceived
n = 92), women in postpartum
(19 month, n = 31) and age-matched controls (n = 75)		Pregnancy and breastfeeding also lead to reversible bone loss, which returns to pre-pregnancy levels 19 months after delivery, independent of the length of breastfeeding.
Steib-Furno et al. [99]Prospective survey and retrospective studyPregnant women (n = 4900)Pregnancy-related transient osteoporosis of the hip (PR-TOH) is a rare, benign orthopedic–obstetrical illness, it usually occurs during the third trimester of pregnancy.
Curtis et al. [93]Randomized
controlled trial		Pregnant women
(Placebo group (n = 188), cholecalciferol-supplemented
(n = 184)) 		The bone resorption marker urinary C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) increased during pregnancy. This occurred to a lesser extent during vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy and this was inversely associated with maternal bone mass following delivery. These results may indicate that vitamin D supplementation may ameliorate and prevent pregnancy-related reversible bone loss in mothers.

7. Comparability of Vitamin D Studies

Publications on vitamin D are increasing exponentially; however, they often present contradictory results. Evaluation of these studies is limited due to small sample sizes, non-randomized patient populations, and on occasion, 25(OH)-vitamin D levels were not measured both at initiation and completion of the trials—in these cases vitamin D levels may not differ in different treatment groups. In other publications, vitamin D supplementation was performed using varying doses for different periods (in many cases, 400 IU, which is the equivalent of a newborn dose) [3]. Ethnicity, latitude and vitamin D ingested via diet and exposure to the sun were not considered. The efficacy of vitamin D supplementation should be studied under well-structured and more detailed circumstances to avoid the abovementioned limitations. These factors may account for the non-significant results found in some of the previous studies.
Currently, vitamin D supplementation is usually determined based on by serum 25(OH)-vitamin D levels. This may be influenced by seasons, latitude, lifestyle, diet, genetic factors and skin pigmentations [3]. There is no consensus regarding the bottom threshold for normal levels; the Endocrine Society and Hungarian guidelines mark this at 30 ng/mL (75 nmol/L) [3,104].

8. Summary and Recommendations

Vitamin D demand increases during pregnancy; a minimum of 30 ng/mL or 75 nmol/L vitamin D levels are recommended. In pregnancy, if vitamin D levels are in the normal range (>75 nmol/L), maintenance doses are recommended, while in cases of suspected or proven deficiency, therapeutic doses of vitamin D should be supplemented. Hungarian and Central European guidelines recommend administering 2000 IU vitamin D daily during pregnancy and breastfeeding. In PCOS or in non-PCOS obese patients, 2000–4000 IU daily doses of vitamin D supplementation are recommended [15,96,105]. Obesity and PCOS, short intervals between deliveries, or breastfeeding for a long period pose increased risk factors for vitamin D deficiency.
According to a latest Central and Eastern European Expert Consensus Statement, which provides clinical guidelines in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of vitamin D deficiency: for women who are planning pregnancy, vitamin D supplementation should start or be maintained as recommended for healthy adults without other risk factors, and the supplementation should be continued during pregnancy and lactation to achieve and maintain optimal vitamin D levels (30–50 ng/mL or 75–125 nmol/L 25(OH)-vitamin D) [106].
At the recommended dose of 2000–4000 IU during pregnancy, vitamin D overdose should not occur. In PCOS (outside the United States, where vitamin D deficiency is rare due to vitamin D supplementation in dairy products), vitamin D deficiency is usually significant enough (usually hundreds of thousands of units of deficiency) that the risk of overdose (with the usual signs of hypercalcemic seizures and central nervous system symptoms, etc.) is limited to extreme doses; however, this has not been encountered in the literature. Using the Coimbra protocol (1000 IU of vitamin D per kg of body weight) may safely be given if accompanied by a strict calcium-poor diet to prevent complications of vitamin D supplementation [107].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.V., I.T. and M.T.; formal analysis, R.E.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.V., I.T., L.T., K.N., R.E.S., J.R.H. and M.T.; writing—review and editing, S.V., I.T., L.T., K.N., R.E.S., J.R.H. and M.T.; visualization, R.E.S.; supervision, S.V. and I.T.; project administration, M.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was supported by the Semmelweis Science and Innovation Fund (STIA-OTKA-2021 for S.V.) and the Hungarian Hypertension Society (for S.V. and M.T.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Thomson, R.L.; Spedding, S.; Buckley, J.D. Vitamin D in the aetiology and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin. Endocrinol. 2012, 77, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Muscogiuri, G.; Altieri, B.; Annweiler, C.; Balercia, G.; Pal, H.B.; Boucher, B.J.; Cannell, J.J.; Foresta, C.; Grübler, M.R.; Kotsa, K.; et al. Vitamin D and chronic diseases: The current state of the art. Arch. Toxicol. 2017, 91, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Muscogiuri, G.; Altieri, B.; de Angelis, C.; Palomba, S.; Pivonello, R.; Colao, A.; Orio, F. Shedding new light on female fertility: The role of vitamin D. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2017, 18, 273–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rak, K.; Bronkowska, M. Immunomodulatory Effect of Vitamin D and Its Potential Role in the Prevention and Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus—A Narrative Review. Molecules 2018, 24, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Bouillon, R.; Carmeliet, G.; Verlinden, L.; van Etten, E.; Verstuyf, A.; Luderer, H.F.; Lieben, L.; Mathieu, C.; DeMay, M. Vitamin D and Human Health: Lessons from Vitamin D Receptor Null Mice. Endocr. Rev. 2008, 29, 726–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fetahu, I.; Höbaus, J.; Kállay, E. Vitamin D and the epigenome. Front. Physiol. 2014, 5, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Bird, A. DNA methylation and the frequency of CpG in animal DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980, 8, 1499–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gruenbaum, Y.; Stein, R.; Cedar, H.; Razin, A. Methylation of CpG sequences in eukaryotic DNA. FEBS Lett. 1981, 124, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Tapp, H.S.; Commane, D.; Bradburn, D.M.; Arasaradnam, R.; Mathers, J.C.; Johnson, I.; Belshaw, N.J. Nutritional factors and gender influence age-related DNA methylation in the human rectal mucosa. Aging Cell 2012, 12, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhu, H.; Wang, X.; Shi, H.; Su, S.; Harshfield, G.A.; Gutin, B.; Snieder, H.; Dong, Y. A Genome-Wide Methylation Study of Severe Vitamin D Deficiency in African American Adolescents. J. Pediatr. 2013, 162, 1004–1009.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. López-Otín, C.; Blasco, M.A.; Partridge, L.; Serrano, M.; Kroemer, G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell 2013, 153, 1194–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Jylhävä, J.; Pedersen, N.L.; Hägg, S. Biological Age Predictors. EBioMedicine 2017, 21, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Vetter, V.M.; Sommerer, Y.; Kalies, C.H.; Spira, D.; Bertram, L.; Demuth, I. Vitamin D Supplementation is Associated with Slower Epigenetic Aging. MedRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Holick, M.F. The vitamin D deficiency pandemic: Approaches for diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2017, 18, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Takács, I.; Dank, M.; Majnik, J.; Nagy, G.; Szabó, A.; Szabó, B.; Szekanecz, Z.; Sziller, I.; Toldy, E.; Tislér, A.; et al. Magyarországi konszenzusajánlás a D-vitamin szerepéről a betegségek megelőzésében és kezelésében. Orv. Hetil. 2022, 15, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Franasiak, J.M.; Lara-Molina, E.E.; Pellicer, A. Vitamin D in human reproduction. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 29, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nandi, A.; Sinha, N.; Ong, E.; Sonmez, H.; Poretsky, L. Is there a role for vitamin D in human reproduction? Horm. Mol. Biol. Clin. Investig. 2016, 25, 15–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Voulgaris, N.; Papanastasiou, L.; Piaditis, G.; Angelousi, A.; Kaltsas, G.; Mastorakos, G.; Kassi, E. Vitamin D and aspects of female fertility. Hormones 2017, 16, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Dennis, N.; Houghton, L.; Jones, G.T.; Van Rij, A.M.; Morgan, K.; McLennan, I.S. The Level of Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone Correlates with Vitamin D Status in Men and Women but Not in Boys. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, 2450–2455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Rojansky, N.; Brzezinski, A.; Schenker, J. Seasonality in human reproduction: An update. Hum. Reprod. 1992, 7, 735–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kinuta, K.; Tanaka, H.; Moriwake, T.; Aya, K.; Kato, S.; Seino, Y. Vitamin D is an important factor in estrogen biosynthesis of both female and male gonads. Endocrinology 2000, 141, 1317–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Akhavizadegan, H.; Karbakhsh, M. Comparison of Serum Vitamin D between Fertile and Infertile Men in A Vitamin D Deficient Endemic Area: A Case-Control Study. Urol. J. 2017, 84, 218–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lorenzen, M.; Boisen, I.M.; Mortensen, L.J.; Lanske, B.; Juul, A.; Jensen, M.B. Reproductive endocrinology of vitamin D. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2017, 453, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ozkan, S.; Jindal, S.; Greenseid, K.; Shu, J.; Zeitlian, G.; Hickmon, C.; Pal, L. Replete vitamin D stores predict reproductive success following in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 2010, 94, 1314–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Xu, J.; Hennebold, J.D.; Seifer, D.B. Direct vitamin D3 actions on rhesus macaque follicles in three-dimensional culture: Assessment of follicle survival, growth, steroid, and antimüllerian hormone production. Fertil. Steril. 2016, 106, 1815–1820.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Azziz, R. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Obs. Gynecol. 2018, 132, 321–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. March, W.A.; Moore, V.M.; Willson, K.J.; Phillips, D.I.; Norman, R.; Davies, M.J. The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in a community sample assessed under contrasting diagnostic criteria. Hum. Reprod. 2009, 25, 544–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Pal, L.; Zhang, H.; Williams, J.; Santoro, N.F.; Diamond, M.P.; Schlaff, W.D.; Coutifaris, C.; Carson, S.A.; Steinkampf, M.P.; Carr, B.R.; et al. Vitamin D Status Relates to Reproductive Outcome in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Secondary Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 101, 3027–3035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Goodarzi, M.O.; Dumesic, D.A.; Chazenbalk, G.; Azziz, R. Polycystic ovary syndrome: Etiology, pathogenesis and diagnosis. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2011, 7, 219–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Szydlarska, D.; Machaj, M.; Jakimiuk, A. History of discovery of polycystic ovary syndrome. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2017, 26, 555–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Han, F.F.; Lv, Y.L.; Gong, L.L.; Liu, H.; Wan, Z.R.; Liu, L.H. VDR Gene variation and insulin resistance related diseases. Lipids Health Dis. 2017, 16, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Zadeh-Vakili, A.; Tehrani, F.R.; Daneshpour, M.A.; Zarkesh, M.; Saadat, N.; Azizi, F. Genetic polymorphism of vitamin D receptor gene affects the phenotype of PCOS. Gene 2013, 515, 193–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mu, Y.; Cheng, D.; Yin, T.-L.; Yang, J. Vitamin D and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Narrative Review. Reprod. Sci. 2021, 28, 2110–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kuyucu, Y.; Çelik, L.S.; Kendirlinan, Ö.; Tap, Özgül; Mete, U.Ö. Investigation of the uterine structural changes in the experimental model with polycystic ovary syndrome and effects of vitamin D treatment: An ultrastructural and immunohistochemical study. Reprod. Biol. 2018, 18, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tannus, S.; Tan, J.; Son, W.Y.; Dahan, M. Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and reproductive outcomes of polycystic ovary syndrome in older women referred for tertiary fertility care. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2017, 297, 1037–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Guo, J.; Liu, S.; Wang, P.; Ren, H.; Li, Y. Characterization of VDR and CYP27B1 expression in the endometrium during the menstrual cycle before embryo transfer: Implications for endometrial receptivity. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2020, 18, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Menichini, D.; Forte, G.; Orrù, B.; Gullo, G.; Unfer, V.; Facchinetti, F. The role of vitamin D in metabolic and reproductive disturbances of polycystic ovary syndrome: A narrative mini-review. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 2020, 92, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Aghadavod, E.; Mollaei, H.; Nouri, M.; Hamishehkar, H. Evaluation of Relationship between Body Mass Index with Vitamin D Receptor Gene Expression and Vitamin D Levels of Follicular Fluid in Overweight Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Int. J. Fertil. Steril. 2017, 11, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhao, J.; Liu, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, P.; Qu, D.; Liu, M.; Ma, W.; Li, Y. Vitamin D improves in-vitro fertilization outcomes in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome and insulin resistance. Minerva Med. 2019, 110, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chakraborty, P.; Goswami, S.K.; Rajani, S.; Sharma, S.; Kabir, S.N.; Chakravarty, B.; Jana, K. Recurrent Pregnancy Loss in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Role of Hyperhomocysteinemia and Insulin Resistance. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lerchbaum, E.; Obermayer-Pietsch, B. MECHANISMS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY: Vitamin D and fertility: A systematic review. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2012, 166, 765–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. van der Spuy, Z.M.; Dyer, S.J. The pathogenesis of infertility and early pregnancy loss in polycystic ovary syndrome. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obs. Gynaecol. 2004, 18, 755–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pittas, A.G.; Lau, J.; Hu, F.B.; Dawson-Hughes, B. The Role of Vitamin D and Calcium in Type 2 Diabetes. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007, 92, 2017–2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shahrokhi, S.Z.; Ghaffari, F.; Kazerouni, F. Role of vitamin D in female Reproduction. Clin. Chim. Acta 2016, 455, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hahn, S.; Haselhorst, U.; Tan, S.; Quadbeck, B.; Schmidt, M.; Roesler, S.; Kimmig, R.; Mann, K.; Janssen, O.E. Low Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations are Associated with Insulin Resistance and Obesity in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes 2006, 114, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pittas, A.G.; Harris, S.S.; Stark, P.C.; Dawson-Hughes, B. The effects of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on blood glucose and markers of inflammation in nondiabetic adults. Diabetes Care 2007, 30, 980–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Yates, N.; Crew, R.C.; Wyrwoll, C.S. Vitamin D deficiency and impaired placental function: Potential regulation by glucocorticoids? Reproduction 2017, 153, R163–R171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Tavakoli, M.; Jeddi-Tehrani, M.; Salek-Moghaddam, A.; Rajaei, S.; Mohammadzadeh, A.; Sheikhhasani, S.; Kazemi-Sefat, G.E.; Zarnani, A.H. Effects of 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D3 on cytokine production by endometrial cells of women with recurrent spontaneous abortion. Fertil. Steril. 2011, 96, 751–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Díaz, L.; Noyola-Martínez, N.; Barrera, D.; Hernández, G.; Avila, E.; Halhali, A.; Larrea, F. Calcitriol inhibits TNF-α-induced inflammatory cytokines in human trophoblasts. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2009, 81, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liu, N.; Kaplan, A.; Low, J.; Nguyen, L.; Liu, G.; Equils, O.; Hewison, M. Vitamin D Induces Innate Antibacterial Responses in Human Trophoblasts via an Intracrine Pathway1. Biol. Reprod. 2009, 80, 398–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Lee, C.L.; Ng, B.K.; Wu, L.L.; Cheah, F.C.; Othman, H.; Ismail, N.A.M. Vitamin D deficiency in pregnancy at term: Risk factors and pregnancy outcomes. Horm. Mol. Biol. Clin. Investig. 2017, 3, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Knabl, J.; Vattai, A.; Ye, Y.; Jueckstock, J.; Hutter, S.; Kainer, F.; Mahner, S.; Jeschke, U. Role of Placental VDR Expression and Function in Common Late Pregnancy Disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Xu, C.; Ma, H.H.; Wang, Y. Maternal Early Pregnancy Plasma Concentration of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Calcif. Tissue Res. 2018, 102, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, M.X.; Pan, G.T.; Guo, J.F.; Li, B.Y.; Qin, L.Q.; Zhang, Z.L. Vitamin D Deficiency Increases the Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Nutrients 2015, 7, 8366–8375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Grundmann, M.; von Versen-Hoynck, F. Vitamin D-roles in women’s reproductive health? Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2011, 9, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Xiaomang, J.; Yanling, W. Effect of vitamin D3 supplementation during pregnancy on high risk factors—A randomized controlled trial. J. Périnat. Med. 2021, 49, 480–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rahnemaei, F.A.; Fashami, M.A.; Abdi, F.; Abbasi, M. Factors effective in the prevention of Preeclampsia: A systematic review. Taiwan J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 59, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Stougaard, M.; Damm, P.; Frederiksen, P.; Jacobsen, R.; Heitmann, B.L. Extra vitamin D from fortification and the risk of preeclampsia: The D-tect Study. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0191288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Schulz, E.V.; Cruze, L.; Wei, W.; Gehris, J.; Wagner, C.L. Maternal vitamin D sufficiency and reduced placental gene expression in angiogenic biomarkers related to comorbidities of pregnancy. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017, 173, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, J.Y.; Wu, P.; Chen, D.; Ning, F.; Lu, Q.; Qiu, X.; Hewison, M.; Tamblyn, J.A.; Kilby, M.D.; Lash, G.E. Vitamin D Promotes Trophoblast Cell Induced Separation of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells in Vascular Remodeling via Induction of G-CSF. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 601043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hou, H.; Zhang, J.; Chen, D.; Deng, F.; Morse, A.; Qiu, X.; He, P.; Lash, G. Altered decidual and placental catabolism of vitamin D may contribute to the aetiology of spontaneous miscarriage. Placenta 2020, 92, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gorelova, I.V.; Popova, P.V.; Rulev, M.V. Vitamin D and reproductive health. Probl. Endokrinol. Mosk 2020, 66, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bubanovic, I. 1α,25-dihydroxy-vitamin-D3 as new immunotherapy in treatment of recurrent spontaneous abortion. Med. Hypotheses 2004, 63, 250–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Andersen, L.B.; Jorgensen, J.S.; Jensen, T.K.; Dalgård, C.; Barington, T.; Nielsen, J.; Beck-Nielsen, S.S.; Husby, S.; Abrahamsen, B.; Lamont, R.F.; et al. Vitamin D insufficiency is associated with increased risk of first-trimester miscarriage in the Odense Child Cohort. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015, 102, 633–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Jefferson, K.K.; Parikh, H.; Garcia, E.M.; Edwards, D.J.; Serrano, M.G.; Hewison, M.; Shary, J.R.; Powell, A.M.; Hollis, B.W.; Fettweis, J.M.; et al. Relationship between vitamin D status and the vaginal microbiome during pregnancy. J. Perinatol. 2019, 39, 824–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wagner, C.L.; Hollis, B.W. Early-Life Effects of Vitamin D: A Focus on Pregnancy and Lactation. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2020, 76, 16–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. McDonnell, S.L.; Baggerly, K.A.; Baggerly, C.A.; Aliano, J.L.; French, C.B.; Baggerly, L.L.; Ebeling, M.D.; Rittenberg, C.S.; Goodier, C.G.; Mateus Niño, J.F.; et al. Maternal 25(OH)D concentrations >/=40 ng/mL associated with 60% lower preterm birth risk among general obstetrical patients at an urban medical center. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0180483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Uçar, N.; Grant, W.B.; Peraita-Costa, I.; Suárez-Varela, M.M. How 25(OH)D Levels during Pregnancy Affect Prevalence of Autism in Children: Systematic Review. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Li, Y.X.; Long, D.L.; Liu, J.; Qiu, D.; Wang, J.; Cheng, X.; Yang, X.; Li, R.M.; Wang, G. Gestational diabetes mellitus in women increased the risk of neonatal infection via inflammation and autophagy in the placenta. Medicine 2020, 99, e22152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zur, R.L.; Kingdom, J.C.; Parks, W.T.; Hobson, S.R. The Placental Basis of Fetal Growth Restriction. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. N. Am. 2020, 47, 81–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Schoots, M.H.; Gordijn, S.J.; Scherjon, S.A.; van Goor, H.; Hillebrands, J.L. Oxidative stress in placental pathology. Placenta 2018, 69, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Nguyen, T.P.H.; Yong, H.E.J.; Chollangi, T.; Borg, A.J.; Brennecke, S.P.; Murthi, P. Placental vitamin D receptor expression is decreased in human idiopathic fetal growth restriction. Klin. Wochenschr. 2015, 93, 795–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Dimasuay, K.G.; Boeuf, P.; Powell, T.L.; Jansson, T. Placental Responses to Changes in the Maternal Environment Determine Fetal Growth. Front. Physiol. 2016, 7, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Wilson, R.L.; Buckberry, S.; Spronk, F.; Laurence, J.A.; Leemaqz, S.; O’Leary, S.; Bianco-Miotto, T.; Du, J.; Anderson, P.H.; Roberts, C.T. Vitamin D Receptor Gene Ablation in the Conceptus Has Limited Effects on Placental Morphology, Function and Pregnancy Outcome. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0131287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Cleal, J.K.; Day, P.E.; Simner, C.L.; Barton, S.J.; Mahon, P.A.; Inskip, H.M.; Godfrey, K.M.; Hanson, M.A.; Cooper, C.; Lewis, R.M.; et al. Placental amino acid transport may be regulated by maternal vitamin D and vitamin D-binding protein: Results from the Southampton Women’s Survey. Br. J. Nutr. 2015, 113, 1903–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Raia-Barjat, T.; Sarkis, C.; Rancon, F.; Thibaudin, L.; Gris, J.C.; Alfaidy, N.; Chauleur, C. Vitamin D deficiency during late pregnancy mediates placenta-associated complications. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 20708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Brodowski, L.; Burlakov, J.; Myerski, A.C.; Von Kaisenberg, C.S.; Grundmann, M.; Hubel, C.A.; Von Versen-Höynck, F. Vitamin D Prevents Endothelial Progenitor Cell Dysfunction Induced by Sera from Women with Preeclampsia or Conditioned Media from Hypoxic Placenta. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Javorski, N.; Lima, C.; Silva, L.; Crovella, S.; Silva, J.D.A. Vitamin D receptor (VDR) polymorphisms are associated to spontaneous preterm birth and maternal aspects. Gene 2018, 642, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wang, B.; Ithier, M.C.; Parobchak, N.; Yadava, S.M.; Schulkin, J.; Rosen, T. Vitamin D stimulates multiple microRNAs to inhibit CRH and other pro-labor genes in human placenta. Endocr. Connect. 2018, 7, 1380–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Wang, Y.; Wang, T.; Huo, Y.; Liu, L.; Liu, S.; Yin, X.; Wang, R.; Gao, X. Placenta expression of vitamin D and related genes in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2020, 204, 105754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Knabl, J.; Hüttenbrenner, R.; Hutter, S.; Günthner-Biller, M.; Riedel, C.; Hiden, U.; Kainer, F.; Desoye, G.; Jeschke, U. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Upregulates Vitamin D Receptor in Extravillous Trophoblasts and Fetoplacental Endothelial Cells. Reprod. Sci. 2015, 22, 358–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Lacroix, M.; Lizotte, F.; Hivert, M.F.; Geraldes, P.; Perron, P. Calcifediol Decreases Interleukin-6 Secretion by Cultured Human Trophoblasts from GDM Pregnancies. J. Endocr. Soc. 2019, 3, 2165–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Tan, M.L.; Abrams, S.A.; Osborn, D.A. Vitamin D supplementation for term breastfed infants to prevent vitamin D deficiency and improve bone health. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018, 83, 013046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wang, C.; Gao, J.; Liu, N.; Yu, S.; Qiu, L.; Wang, D. Maternal factors associated with neonatal vitamin D deficiency. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 32, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Merewood, A.; Mehta, S.D.; Chen, T.C.; Bauchner, H.; Holick, M.F. Association between Vitamin D Deficiency and Primary Cesarean Section. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 94, 940–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Maugeri, A.; Barchitta, M.; Blanco, I.; Agodi, A. Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation During Pregnancy on Birth Size: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Nutrients 2019, 11, 442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Brooke, O.G.; Brown, I.R.; Bone, C.D.; Carter, N.D.; Cleeve, H.J.; Maxwell, J.D.; Robinson, V.P.; Winder, S.M. Vitamin D supplements in pregnant Asian women: Effects on calcium status and fetal growth. BMJ 1980, 280, 751–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Dror, D.K. Vitamin D status during pregnancy: Maternal, fetal, and postnatal outcomes. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011, 23, 422–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Pasco, J.A.; Wark, J.D.; Carlin, J.B.; Ponsonby, A.L.; Vuillermin, P.J.; Morley, R. Maternal vitamin D in pregnancy may influence not only offspring bone mass but other aspects of musculoskeletal health and adiposity. Med. Hypotheses 2008, 71, 266–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Cranney, A.; Horsley, T.; O’Donnell, S.; Weiler, H.; Puil, L.; Ooi, D.; Atkinson, S.; Ward, L.; Moher, D.; Hanley, D.; et al. Effectiveness and safety of vitamin D in relation to bone health. Évid. Rep. Technol. Assess. 2007, 158, 1–235. [Google Scholar]
  91. Møller, U.K.; Streym, S.V.; Mosekilde, L.; Rejnmark, L. Changes in bone mineral density and body composition during pregnancy and postpartum. A controlled cohort study. Osteoporos. Int. 2012, 23, 1213–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Breasail, M.Ó.; Prentice, A.; Ward, K. Pregnancy-Related Bone Mineral and Microarchitecture Changes in Women Aged 30 to 45 Years. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2020, 35, 1253–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Curtis, E.M.; Parsons, C.; Maslin, K.; D’Angelo, S.; Moon, R.J.; Crozier, S.R.; Gossiel, F.; Bishop, N.J.; Kennedy, S.H.; Papageorghiou, A.T.; et al. Bone turnover in pregnancy, measured by urinary CTX, is influenced by vitamin D supplementation and is associated with maternal bone health: Findings from the Maternal Vitamin D Osteoporosis Study (MAVIDOS) trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 114, 1600–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Pludowski, P.; Grant, W.; Bhattoa, H.P.; Bayer, M.; Povoroznyuk, V.; Rudenka, E.; Ramanau, H.; Varbiro, S.; Rudenka, A.; Karczmarewicz, E.; et al. Vitamin D Status in Central Europe. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2014, 2014, 589587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Pludowski, P.; Holick, M.F.; Grant, W.B.; Konstantynowicz, J.; Mascarenhas, M.R.; Haq, A.; Povoroznyuk, V.; Balatska, N.; Barbosa, A.P.; Karonova, T.; et al. Vitamin D supplementation guidelines. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018, 175, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Płudowski, P.; Karczmarewicz, E.; Bayer, M.; Carter, G.; Chlebna-Sokół, D.; Czech-Kowalska, J.; Dębski, R.; Decsi, T.; Dobrzańska, A.; Franek, E.; et al. Practical guidelines for the supplementation of vitamin D and the treatment of deficits in Central Europe—Recommended vitamin D intakes in the general population and groups at risk of vitamin D deficiency. Endokrynol. Polska 2013, 64, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Takács, I.; Benkő, I.; Toldy, E.; Wikonkál, N.; Szekeres, L.; Bodolay, E.; Kiss, E.; Jambrik, Z.; Szabó, B.; Merkely, B.; et al. Hungarian consensus regarding the role of vitamin D in the prevention and treatment of diseases. Orv. Hetil. 2012, 153, 5–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Quaresima, P.; Angeletti, M.; Luziatelli, D.; Luziatelli, S.; Venturella, R.; Di Carlo, C.; Bernardo, S. Pregnancy associated transient osteoporosis of the hip (PR-TOH): A non–obstetric indication to caesarean section. A case report with literature review. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2021, 262, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. teib-Furno, S.; Mathieu, L.; Pham, T.; Armingeat, T.; Porcu, G.; Gamerre, M.; Chagnaud, C.; Lafforgue, P. Pregnancy-related hip diseases: Incidence and diagnoses. Jt. Bone Spine 2007, 74, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Bouillon, R.; Marcocci, C.; Carmeliet, G.; Bikle, D.; White, J.H.; Dawson-Hughes, B.; Lips, P.; Munns, C.F.; Lazaretti-Castro, M.; Giustina, A.; et al. Skeletal and Extraskeletal Actions of Vitamin D: Current Evidence and Outstanding Questions. Endocr. Rev. 2019, 40, 1109–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Hu, K.L.; Zhang, C.X.; Chen, P.; Zhang, D.; Hunt, S. Vitamin D Levels in Early and Middle Pregnancy and Preeclampsia, a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2022, 14, 999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wierzejska, R. Evaluation of prenatal vitamin-mineral preparations in the context of recommended dietary supplementation. Are pregnant women supplied with what they should get? Rocz. Państwowego Zakładu Hig. 2021, 72, 309–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Wierzejska, R.E. Review of Dietary Recommendations for Twin Pregnancy: Does Nutrition Science Keep Up with the Growing Incidence of Multiple Gestations? Nutrients 2022, 14, 1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Takács, I.; Benkő, I.; Toldy, E.; Wikonkál, N.; Szekeres, L.; Bodolay, E.; Kiss, E.; Jambrik, Z.; Szabó, B.; Merkely, B.; et al. Harmadik magyarországi konszenzus a D-vitamin szerepéről a betegségek megelőzésében és kezelésében. Orv. Szle. 2016, 2, 13–26. [Google Scholar]
  105. Kimball, S.M.; Holick, M.F. Official recommendations for vitamin D through the life stages in developed countries. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2020, 74, 1514–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Pludowski, P.; Takacs, I.; Boyanov, M.; Belaya, Z.; Diaconu, C.C.; Mokhort, T.; Zherdova, N.; Rasa, I.; Payer, J.; Pilz, S. Clinical Practice in the Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Vitamin D Deficiency: A Central and Eastern European Expert Consensus Statement. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Lemke, D.; Klement, R.J.; Schweiger, F.; Schweiger, B.; Spitz, J. Vitamin D Resistance as a Possible Cause of Autoimmune Diseases: A Hypothesis Confirmed by a Therapeutic High-Dose Vitamin D Protocol. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 655739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Influence of Vitamin D on fertility and in vitro fertilization.
Table 1. Influence of Vitamin D on fertility and in vitro fertilization.
StudyArticle TypeStudy GroupSummary
Xu et al. [25]Cell line (animal)Secondary preantral follicles were isolated from ovaries of rhesus monkeysVitamin D increases survival of the preantral follicle, sustains AMH production and enhances the growth of the antral follicle.
Kinute et al. [21] Animal StudyVDR null mutant mice
(n = 3–10 group)		In females: uterine hypoplasia, decreased aromatase activity and aromatase gene expression were observed; in males: decreased sperm count and decreased motility with histological abnormality of the testis were observed.
Akhavizadegan et al. [22] Case control studyFertile men (n = 116) and
infertile men (n = 114)		Men with vitamin D levels below 20 ng/mL have significantly lower sperm counts. The mean vitamin D level in the fertile group was significantly higher than in the infertile group.
Dennis et al. [19]Correlative and
intervention study		Mature men (n = 113), premenopausal women
(n = 35), 5- to 6-yr-old boys
(n = 74)		Serum AMH correlates positively with vitamin D levels in men (but not in boys). Vitamin D levels and AMH levels show a seasonal difference in women, with AMH levels falling by 18% in the winter compared to summer. The change in AMH levels correlates with initial AMH levels and the magnitude of the change in vitamin D levels. Vitamin D supplementation prevents seasonal AMH change.
Ozkan et al. [24]Prospective Cohort StudyInfertile women
undergoing IVF (n = 84)		Vitamin D level influences the outcomes of IVF independently of age, BMI, ethnicity and the number of embryo transfers. Vitamin D levels correlate strongly (r = 0.94) with follicular fluid.
Table
Table 2. Polycystic ovary syndrome and vitamin D deficiency.
Table 2. Polycystic ovary syndrome and vitamin D deficiency.
StudyArticle TypeStudy GroupSummary
Tavakoli et al. [48]Cell line (human)Endometrial samples (from women with recurrent spontaneous abortion and healthy controls) Vitamin D supplementation may have a beneficial effect in case of recurrent miscarriages. As a result of vitamin D supplementation, Th2 cytokine dominance was observed with decreased proliferation of inflammatory cytokines.
Diaz et al. [49]Cell line (human)Term placentae samples (37–41 weeks of gestation, from uncomplicated pregnancies)Calcitriol supplementation prevents the production of TNF alpha, IL-6 and IFN gamma—this is likely mediated by VDR.
Liu et al. [50]Cell line (human)Human trophoblastic cell lines from American Type Tissue Culture CollectionIn human trophoblast cells, Vitamin D metabolites significantly enhance antibacterial responses.
Kuyucu et al. [34]Animal studyPrepubertal female rats, control group (n = 8),
PCOS group (n = 8) and PCOS + D3 group (n = 8)		Vitamin D treatment significantly reduced endometrial, epithelial and stromal thickness in PCOS patients, as well as pathological proliferation and apoptosis. AMH was also decreased as a result of vitamin D supplementation (this however did not reach the level of significance).
Guo et al. [36]Case control studyEndometrial samples from women who underwent standardized IVF treatment (n = 16)VDR plays role in the development of endometrial susceptibility: increased VDR expression in the endometrium (especially in the implantation window of the menstrual cycle) is significantly more likely to lead to pregnancy.
Zadeh-Vakili et al. [32]Case control
study		PCOS women (n = 260) and women with physiological cycles (n = 221)The genetic variant of VDR is associated with the severity of the clinical features of PCOS, but not with the risk of the disease itself.
Aghadavod et al. [38]Case control
study		Control group (n = 20 normal weights and n = 20 over-weights); PCOS group (n = 20 normal weight and n = 20 over-weight)Vitamin D levels in follicular fluid are significantly lower in PCOS and overweight patients. Vitamin D levels in follicular fluid strongly correlate with BMI. VDR expression in granulosa cells is significantly lower in PCOS/overweight patients than in non PCOS or normal weight individuals.
Zhao et al. [39]Case control
study		In total, 305 women were divided into 4 groups based on serum vitamin D levels.Optimal vitamin D levels improve embryo quality and lead to significantly higher clinical pregnancy rates.
March et al. [27]Retrospective birth cohort studyIn total, 728 women born between 1973–1975 in a
single maternity hospital were traced and interviewed in adulthood (age = 27–34 year; n = 728).		Prevalence estimates for Rotterdam and AES may be up two twice of that for NIH criteria A significant proportion of women with PCOS are not diagnosed or are diagnosed late.
Pal et al. [28]Retrospective cohort study (Secondary analysis of randomized controlled trial data)Participants in the Pregnancy in PCOS I randomized controlled trial (n = 540) who
met the National Institutes of Health diagnostic criteria for PCOS.		In women with PCOS, serum vitamin D level is an independent predictor of reproductive success rates following induction of ovulation. Probability of ovulation correlates with vitamin D levels in PCOS. The reproductive threshold for serum vitamin D is higher in than that recommended for the non-pregnant population.
Hahn et al. [45]Prospective cohort studyPCOS women (n = 120)In PCOS, insulin resistance correlates negatively with vitamin D levels.
Pittas et al. [46]Randomized
controlled trial		Caucasian adults (n = 314)In older healthy adults with impaired fasting glucose (IFG), calcium and vitamin D supplementation may reduce the further development of insulin resistance.
Table
Table 3. Vitamin D deficiency and pregnancy.
Table 3. Vitamin D deficiency and pregnancy.
StudyArticle TypeStudy GroupSummary
Wilson et al. [74]Animal studyVDR+/− virgin female mice
(n = 12) + VDR+/− male mice 		In VDR−/− placenta, the expression of Deptor and Prr5 involved in mTOR signaling was decreased significantly.
Cleal et al. [75]Cell line (human)Placental samples collected in the Southampton Women’s Survey (n = 102)Maternal vitamin D and vitamin-D-binding protein levels correlate positively with the expression of amino-acid transporter genes of the placenta.
Brodowski et al. [77]Cell line (human)Cord blood samples from
uncomplicated pregnancies and uncomplicated pregnancy villous placentae		Vitamin D promotes the formation of capillary-like tubules and the migration of endothelial colony-forming cells, minimizing the negative effects of preeclampsia.
Wang et al. [79]Cell line (human)Placenta samples from healthy women
(38–40 weeks of gestations)		Vitamin D downregulates pro-labor genes such as corticotropin-releasing hormone. This reduces the risk of preterm birth.
Javorski et al. [78]Cell line
(human)		Pregnant women (n = 189)Polymorphisms in the VDR gene (Fok-l and Cdx-2) increase the risk of spontaneous preterm birth.
Wang et al. [80]Case-control studyGDM women (n = 41) and healthy pregnant women
(n = 40)		Placental CYP24A1 protein and mRNA levels responsible for vitamin D catabolism, VDR protein and mRNA levels are increased in GDM.
Knabl et al. [81]Case-control studyPlacental tissue samples from GDM and control patients
(n = 40 GDM and
n = 40 controls)		VDR expression is regulated in a bimodal fashion by calcitriol: high doses (0.1 and 1 nmol/mL) lead to downregulation, while low doses (0.01 nmol/mL) lead to VDR upregulation.
Lacroix et al. [82]Case-control studyPlacental tissue samples from normoglycemic and GDM women.VDR protein expression was increased in GDM patient placenta samples; Vitamin D decreases IL-6 secretion.
Hou et al. [61]Case-control studyPlacenta and decidua samples were collected following termination of pregnancy (controls n = 20 and spontaneous miscarriage n = 20)In cases of spontaneous miscarriage, placental and decidual expression of both the vitamin D receptor and the vitamin-D-binding protein was increased. Women who undergo assisted reproductive technologies should ensure optimal vitamin D levels prior to pregnancy.
Nguyen et al. [72]Case-control studyPlacentae from pregnancies complicated by idiopathic fetal growth restriction (n = 25) and gestational-matched controls (n = 25)In cases of idiopathic fetal growth restriction, VDR mRNA and protein levels were all significantly decreased.
Stougaard et al. [58]Retrospective cohort studyWoman who gave birth between 1983–1988 (n = 73,237)There is no association between increased dietary intake of vitamin D and the incidence of preeclampsia.
Merewood et al. [85]Retrospective cohort studyWomen (n = 253) who had undergone a primary cesarean section (n = 43)There is a negative association between maternal serum vitamin D levels and cesarean sections. Women with vitamin D levels below 37.5 nmol/L were almost four times more likely to have a
cesarean section.
Lee et al. [51]Prospective
observational study		Women who completed 37 weeks of pregnancy (n = 680)In total, 71.7% of pregnant women were vitamin D deficient, 21.0% of pregnant women were vitamin D insufficient and 7.3% of pregnant women had
adequate vitamin D levels.
Xu et al. [53]Prospective
cohort study		Pregnant women (n = 827, 101 developed GDM)Median plasma vitamin D concentrations at the first prenatal visit were significantly lower in women who later developed GMD.
Andersen et al. [64]Prospective
cohort study		Pregnant women (n = 1683)The adjusted hazard of first trimester miscarriage is lower at higher vitamin D levels: vitamin D levels below 50 ng/mL double the risk of a miscarriage. No such relationship was found in the second trimester.
McDonnell et al. [67]Prospective
cohort study		Pregnant women (n = 1064)Maternal vitamin D levels above 40 ng/mL reduce the risk of preterm birth.
Raia-Barjat et al. [76]Prospective multicenter cohort studyPregnant women (n = 200)At 32 weeks of gestation, placenta-mediated complications (PMC) were 5-fold higher in vitamin D deficiency patients compared to those with normal vitamin D levels. There is a strong inverse relationship between serum vitamin D levels and the risk of late PMC. Vitamin D plays a role in maintaining placental performance, thus preventing the development of late PMC.
Wang et al. [84]Prospective case-control studyMother-infant dyads
(36.8 ± 2.7 weeks of gestational, n = 125)		In total, 56% of newborns were vitamin D deficient. Neonatal vitamin D deficiency may be associated with winter birth, insufficient sunbathing time, high maternal BMI, insufficient egg consumption, insufficient vitamin D supplementation and adverse health insurance status.
Xiaomang et al. [56]Randomized controlled trialWomen who had undergone maternity treatment and
delivery (n = 450)		Vitamin D supplementation may reduce the incidence of preeclampsia while also lowering the IUGR index.
Schulz et al. [59]Randomized controlled trialPregnant women (n = 43)Serum vitamin D levels above 100 ng/mL reduce the expression of soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) and VEGF. Maternal vitamin D supplementation may reduce the transcription of genes that contribute to preeclampsia.
Jefferson et al. [65]Randomized controlled trialPregnant women (n = 316)Vitamin D may have a positive impact on the vaginal microbiome: megasphere correlated negatively and L. crispatus correlated positively with plasma vitamin D levels.
Brooke et al. [87]Randomized controlled trialPregnant women (D-vitamin treated n = 59 and control
n = 67) during the last trimester		The risk of SGA in the control group was almost twice that found in the vitamin-D-supplemented group.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Várbíró, S.; Takács, I.; Tűű, L.; Nas, K.; Sziva, R.E.; Hetthéssy, J.R.; Török, M. Effects of Vitamin D on Fertility, Pregnancy and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome—A Review. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1649. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14081649

AMA Style

Várbíró S, Takács I, Tűű L, Nas K, Sziva RE, Hetthéssy JR, Török M. Effects of Vitamin D on Fertility, Pregnancy and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome—A Review. Nutrients. 2022; 14(8):1649. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14081649

Chicago/Turabian Style

Várbíró, Szabolcs, István Takács, László Tűű, Katalin Nas, Réka Eszter Sziva, Judit Réka Hetthéssy, and Marianna Török. 2022. "Effects of Vitamin D on Fertility, Pregnancy and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome—A Review" Nutrients 14, no. 8: 1649. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14081649

APA Style

Várbíró, S., Takács, I., Tűű, L., Nas, K., Sziva, R. E., Hetthéssy, J. R., & Török, M. (2022). Effects of Vitamin D on Fertility, Pregnancy and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome—A Review. Nutrients, 14(8), 1649. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14081649

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop