Next Article in Journal
Associations between Serum Vitamin A and Metabolic Risk Factors among Eastern Chinese Children and Adolescents
Previous Article in Journal
Non-Targeted Dried Blood Spot-Based Metabolomics Analysis Showed Rice Bran Supplementation Effects Multiple Metabolic Pathways during Infant Weaning and Growth in Mali
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Metabolism and Health Effects of Rare Sugars in a CACO-2/HepG2 Coculture Model

Nutrients 2022, 14(3), 611; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030611
by Amar van Laar 1, Charlotte Grootaert 1, Filip Van Nieuwerburgh 2, Dieter Deforce 2, Tom Desmet 3, Koen Beerens 3 and John Van Camp 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Nutrients 2022, 14(3), 611; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030611
Submission received: 3 January 2022 / Revised: 26 January 2022 / Accepted: 27 January 2022 / Published: 30 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Novel Therapeutic Nutrient Molecules)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

please see attachment

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a widespread disease. In their study, Amar van Laar et al. describe the effects of rare (trehalose, nigerose, kojibiose, L-arabinose) sugars compared to conventional carbohydrates (glucose, fructose, galactose, maltose) on energy production, intestinal permeability, liver fat accumulation and gene expression. They observed different structure-specific effects, suggesting health potential for trehalose and L-arabinose.

This work has some merit because it is one of the first report, which provides relevant information on the molecular impact of rare disaccharides. The manuscript is well written.

Some minor points should be considered:

  • Page 3, first paragraph: “24 well plates and…” should be rewritten to “Twenty-four well plates and…” or “Overall 24 well plates and…”
  • Page 4, last paragraph: “24-Well plates…” should be rewritten to “Twenty-four well plates…” or “Overall 24 well plates and…”
  • Page 6, Subtitle: “2.9. SRB assay….” Should be spelled out to “Sulforhodamine B assay…”

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

We appreciate your input and have implemented your suggestions. 

They can be found at lines 109, 158 and 218. 

All other changes can be seen in the 'track changes file'.

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The rebuttal is convincing and I regard the revised manuscript suitable for publication. One last comment: p-values should be "0.05" instead of "0,05". 

Back to TopTop