Next Article in Journal
A Pilot Study for the Detection of Cyclic Prolyl-Hydroxyproline (Pro-Hyp) in Human Blood after Ingestion of Collagen Hydrolysate
Next Article in Special Issue
Maternal Nutrition and Body Composition During Breastfeeding: Association with Human Milk Composition
Previous Article in Journal
Magnesium Intake and Sleep Disorder Symptoms: Findings from the Jiangsu Nutrition Study of Chinese Adults at Five-Year Follow-Up
Previous Article in Special Issue
Human Milk Casein and Whey Protein and Infant Body Composition over the First 12 Months of Lactation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 10
Issue 10
10.3390/nu10101355
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Human Breast Milk NMR Metabolomic Profile across Specific Geographical Locations and Its Association with the Milk Microbiota

by
Carlos Gómez-Gallego
1,*,
Jose Manuel Morales
2,3,4,
Daniel Monleón
2,4,
Elloise Du Toit
5,
Himanshu Kumar
1,
Kaisa M. Linderborg
6,
Yumei Zhang
7,
Baoru Yang
6,
Erika Isolauri
8,
Seppo Salminen
1 and
Maria Carmen Collado
1,9,*
1
Functional Foods Forum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland
2
Laboratory of Metabolomics, Institute of Health Research-INCLIVA, 46010 Valencia, Spain
3
Unidad Central de Investigación en Medicina, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
4
Pathology Department, School of Medicine, University of Valencia, 46100 Valencia, Spain
5
Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, 7925 Cape Town, South Africa
6
Food Chemistry and Food Development, Department of Biochemistry, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland
7
Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University, 100191 Beijing, China
8
Department of Paediatrics, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, 20520 Turku, Finland
9
Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology-National Research Council (IATA-CSIC), 46980 Valencia, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2018, 10(10), 1355; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10101355
Submission received: 24 July 2018 / Revised: 7 September 2018 / Accepted: 18 September 2018 / Published: 21 September 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Breastfeeding and Human Lactation)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The composition of human breast milk is highly variable, and it can be influenced by genetics, diet, lifestyle, and other environmental factors. This study aimed to investigate the impact of geographical location and mode of delivery on the nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) metabolic profile of breast milk and its relationship with the milk microbiome. Human milk metabolic and microbiota profiles were determined using NMR and 16S rRNA gene sequencing, respectively, in 79 healthy women from Finland, Spain, South Africa, and China. Up to 68 metabolites, including amino acids, oligosaccharides, and fatty acid-associated metabolites, were identified in the milk NMR spectra. The metabolite profiles showed significant differences between geographical locations, with significant differences (p < 0.05) in the levels of galactose, lacto-N-fucopentaose III, lacto-N-fucopentaose I and 2-fucosyllactose, 3-fucosyllactose, lacto-N-difucohexaose II, lacto-N-fucopentaose III, 2-hydroxybutyrate, 3-hydroxybutyrate, proline, N-acetyl lysine, methyl-histidine, dimethylamine, kynurenine, urea, creatine and creatine phosphate, formate, lactate, acetate, phosphocholine, acetylcholine, LDL, VLDL, ethanolamine, riboflavin, hippurate, spermidine, spermine and uridine. Additionally, the effect of caesarean section on milk metabolome was dependent on the geographical region. Specific interrelations between human milk metabolites and microbiota were also identified. Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacilli were most significantly associated with the milk metabolites, being either positively or negatively correlated depending on the metabolite. Our results reveal specific milk metabolomic profiles across geographical locations and also highlight the potential interactions between human milk’s metabolites and microbes.

1. Introduction

Arguably, the cornerstone of healthy growth and development in children is breast feeding, since breast milk offers myriad physiological advantages when compared to other sources of nutrition. Indeed, the optimal model of infant feeding is the healthy breastfed child [1]. When compared with formula-fed infants, breastfed children exhibit a reduced risk of gastrointestinal and respiratory infections [2], allergic disease [3,4], and being overweight or obese, with the benefits actually extending beyond infancy [5,6].
Breast milk contains many biologically active compounds, such as growth factors, antimicrobial and immune-enhancing substances, oligosaccharides (HMOs), as well as a diverse and rich bacterial community [7,8,9,10].
The composition of human breast milk is determined by genetic factors, lifestyle, diet, and the age of the mother [11,12]. Furthermore, human milk’s macronutrient composition varies across lactation, although it is relatively conserved between populations [13]. However, the determinants of the bioactive compounds are currently less well understood. While some components of human milk appear to be relatively stable across different locations, some, such as polyunsaturated fatty acids, vary according to the mother’s diet [9,14], while others, such as polyamines [15], HMOs [16], and milk bacteria [9,17], seem to vary depending of multiple factors. The mode of birth has also been reported to be a modulating factor for human milk’s composition, acting in a differential manner in different countries [9,15]. Yet, the complex interactions between the constituents of milk, the biological impact, and the consequences for the infant’s health in the short- and long-term remain unclear.
In addition, the host-milk microbial interactions may be influenced by the presence and/or concentration of milk metabolites, which may in turn influence the intestinal bacterial communities as well as the immune cell populations in breastfed children due to favoring the growth of specific microbial genera [8].
The present study aimed to compare the metabolomic profile of human milk obtained from different regions and different delivery modes, as well as to ascertain the potential interaction with milk microbiota.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Breast Milk Sample Collection

This study’s population comprised 79 healthy women volunteers representing different populations from around the world, including China (Beijing area), South Africa (Cape Town area), Finland (southwestern area), and Spain (Valencia area). The women were enrolled in the study according to previously described inclusion criteria [9]. Further, the subjects from each country (n = 20) were grouped into two sub-groups according to the mode of delivery, namely either vaginal delivery (n = 10 for each country) or caesarean section (n = 10 for China, Finland, and Spain; n = 9 for South Africa). Data regarding age of the mother and perinatal body max index (BMI) are presented in Table S1. The mothers from China had significantly lower BMI (p < 0.001), but there were no differences in other parameters between countries and mode of delivery. Parity was between 1 and 3, mostly 1 and 2, with no differences among countries or between mode of delivery. Exclusively breastfeeding was reported at time of the sampling.
All the participating women received written, complete, and detailed information about the study. Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants, and the ethics committees of the respective participating countries (Spain [Bioethics Committee of CSIC and the Regional Ethics Committee for Biomedical Research, Ref: ERC-639226], Finland [Turku University Hospital, Ref: 24/1801/2013], China [Medical Research Board of Peking University, Ref: IRB00001052-16038], and South Africa [University of Cape Town, Human Research Ethics Committee, Ref: HREC 649/2016]), approved the study protocol. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Inclusion criteria requested exclusive breastfeeding practices at sampling time and healthy status of the mother-child pairs. Exclusion criteria included antibiotics use after birth, perinatal probiotic consumption, and presence of disease.
Prior to the sample collection, the mothers were given oral and written instructions regarding the standardized collection of samples. The mature milk samples (one month postpartum) were collected manually in the morning into a sterile tube using the same protocol in all the countries. Before the collection, the mothers’ nipples and mammary areola were cleaned with soap and sterile water and then soaked in chlorohexidine in order to reduce the presence of skin bacteria. Samples were collected in the morning, from one breast, before baby feeding. The first drops of milk (approx. 500 μL) were discarded. The average collected volume was 10 mL. All the samples were kept frozen at −20 °C until delivery to the laboratory. They were then stored at −80 °C for further analysis.
The breast milk samples were thawed, carefully mixed by means of inversion, and then centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C. The fat was removed and the pellet was used for the total DNA extraction. Avoiding the outer layer of fat, the whey milk was transferred to a clean Falcon tube and then centrifuged again. This procedure was repeated. A clear supernatant was used for the metabolomic profile analysis.

2.2. Breast Milk Metabolite Profiling

A proton nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis of all the collected samples was performed. For each group, the milk samples (455 µL) were mixed with 45 µL of sodium-3′-trimethylsilylpropionate-2,2,3,3-d4 (TSP) solved in deuterium oxide and then placed in a 5 mm NMR tube. The final TSP concentration in each sample was 2.5 mM. All the spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance DRX 600 spectrometer (Bruker GmbH, Rheinstetten, Germany) operating at a 1H frequency of 600.13 MHz. The spectrometer was equipped with a triple resonance 1H/13C/31P probe. The nominal temperature of the samples was kept at 310 K. A single-pulse pre-saturation experiment was performed for all the samples. A total of 64 transients were collected into 65 k data points for all the experiments, with a spectral width of 14 ppm. Water presaturation was performed for one second during the recycling delay for the solvent signal suppression. Prior to the Fourier transformation, the free induction decay was multiplied with a 0.3 Hz exponential line-broadening function. All the spectra were processed using MestReNova 8.1 software (Mestrelab Research S.L., Santiago de Compostela, Spain) and then transferred to MATLAB R2013a (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA 2013) using in-house scripts for data analysis. The metabolite spin systems and resonances were identified using data obtained from both the literature and the commercial resonances database Chenomx NMR Suite Profiler (Chenomx NMR Suite 8.1, Chenomx Inc., Edmonton, AB, Canada). The spectra were manually phase corrected and baseline adjusted, referenced to the TSP, and normalized to the total aliphatic spectral area (0.50 and 4.40 ppm) in order to eliminate any differences in the total metabolite concentration. The signals belonging to the identified metabolites were then integrated and quantified using the semi-automated 1H NMR signal deconvolution routines in MestReNova 8.1 (Mestrelab Research SL, Santiago de Compostela, Spain). The final metabolite levels were calculated in arbitrary units as the area under the peak. In addition, two-dimensional NMR methods, including homonuclear correlation spectroscopy (TOCSY) and heteronuclear single quantum correlation spectroscopy (HSQC), were applied to a selected group of samples so as to confirm the assessment of the metabolites.

2.3. Breast Milk DNA Extraction and Microbial 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

The process of microbial DNA extraction and sequencing using an Illumina MiSeq sequencer was described in a previous study by Kumar et al. [9]. The sequencing data were submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information with the Sequence Read Archive accession: SRP082263 and submission ID: SUB1772296.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

A chemometrics statistical analysis was performed using in-house MATLAB scripts and the PLS_Toolbox 8.0.2 (Eigenvector Research, Inc., Wenatchee, WA, USA) statistical multivariate analysis library. The normalization of the NMR spectra was done using the total aliphatic spectral area (0.50 and 4.40 ppm) in order to eliminate any differences in the total metabolite concentration. Mean-centered and Pareto data scaling were used prior to multivariate analysis. A principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to the NMR spectra data sets. A PCA is able to identify low-dimensional embeddings of multivariate data in such a way that optimally preserves the structure of the data. The main advantage of PCA models is that the key sources of variability within the data are modeled by the so-called principal components (PCs) and, consequently, their associated scores and loadings allow for the visualization and understanding of different patterns and relations in the data. The principal components were chosen to explain at least 70% of the variance. The loading plots of the corresponding principal components were then used to detect the positions of most discriminative variables in the NMR spectra. In order to maximize the separation between the samples, a partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was conducted. A permutation test was performed to check the overfitting of the PLS-DA models. The multivariate chemometric models were cross-validated using ten-fold leave-one-out cross-validation. In each run, 10% of the data were left out of the training and used to test the model. The entire cross-validation process was run ten times. The spectral regions responsible for the classification of the models were identified using the variable importance in projections (VIP) coefficients obtained during the PLS-DA. The threshold used for VIP selection was ≥1. Spectral regions with high VIP coefficients are more important in terms of providing class separation during the analysis, while those with very small VIP coefficients provide only a small contribution to the classification.
SPSS 25.0.0.1 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was employed for the statistical analysis of the milk metabolites. Differences were considered significant at p ≤ 0.05. Due to the non-normal distribution of the data and high presence of outliers, nonparametric tests were used. Comparisons among the data between the different countries were made by applying the Kruskal-Wallis test, while comparisons between the modes of birth were made by applying the Mann-Whitney U test. The significance values in the pairwise comparison were adjusted using the Bonferroni correction for multiple tests.
Calypso online software version 8.50 was used for data normalized via cumulative sum scaling in order to generate heat maps for the Spearman’s correlations between the microbial groups and milk metabolites.

3. Results

A total of 68 metabolites were identified in the human milk one month after delivery, as detailed in Table 1. The metabolites included 23 amino acids and derivatives, 18 sugars and derivatives, ten lipids and fatty acid-associated metabolites, and seven metabolites associated with energy metabolism, while the rest were linked to metabolic processes involving vitamins or nucleic acids, microbial metabolism, and food additives.
The most abundant metabolite was lactose, followed by lipids, with high amounts of the lipoproteins LDL (low-density lipoprotein) and VLDL (very low-density lipoproteins), and then, HMOs, and amino acids. The accurate relative quantitation of several metabolites by means of NMR was difficult due to the presence of multiple peaks or severe spectral overlapping, and it was thus not included in statistical analysis. Therefore, of the 68 metabolites identified, 37 were employed for statistical analysis in SPSS 25.0.0.1 software. Maternal factor and metabolites association were analyzed as shown in Table S2.
The presence of LDL and VLDL as milk metabolites can be controversial. The particles detected in milk have similar nuclear magnetic resonances (NMR), physicochemical properties and mobility than those lipoproteins detected in plasma. However, they might be also different lipid and protein conjugates with similar composition and hydrodynamic properties; lipids similar to those present in LDL and VLDL enclosed in phospholipids, free cholesterol and proteins; or free lipids similar to those enclosed in LDL and VLDL attached to large proteins. For this reason, they should be considered LDL- and VLDL-like particles.

3.1. Differences in Milk Metabolites between Countries

The global metabolic profile of breast milk was found to be different between countries, as seen in Figure 1. The PLS-DA analysis showed the Spanish samples to be widely dispersed, being more similar to the Finnish and South African samples and totally separate from the Chinese samples. After the exclusion of the Spanish milk samples from the analysis, total separation with only minimal overlapping between the samples was observed. PCA plots and loadings are available as supplementary material in Figures S1 and S2.
Significant differences in the sugars and HMOs between the countries can be seen in Figure 2. When compared to the breast milk samples from Finland, the Chinese samples exhibited significantly higher levels of 3-fucosyllactose (3′FL) and lacto-N-fucopentaose III (LNFP III). A higher abundance of lacto-N-fucopentaose I (LNFP I) and 2-fucosyllactose (2′FL) was observed in Finland and Spain, respectively, while 3′FL and LNFP III were more highly abundant in South Africa and China, respectively.
Figure 3 shows statistically significant regional differences in the amino acids and derivatives found in the human milk samples. All of them have an endogenous origin and might therefore be the result of dietary and/or metabolic differences between geographical locations.
With regard to the content of the energy metabolites, fatty acids, and associated metabolites, the differences between countries are shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5. The Finnish and Spanish samples were characterized by higher levels of lipoproteins (LDL and VLDL). Short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) were also detected with higher levels of acetate and formate in the Spanish samples.
The statistically significant differences identified in the other metabolites are presented in Figure 6. Some of them have a dietary origin, such as vitamin B2 (riboflavin), while others, such as the polyamines (spermidine and spermine), could have an endogenous, dietary, or microbial origin.

3.2. Impact of Mode of Delivery on Human Milk Metabolites

Independent of the country, the mode of delivery has a distinct impact on the human milk metabolome, as seen in Figure 7.
When considering all the mothers included in the study, six of the 37 semi-quantified metabolites were statistically different in the milk samples obtained from the mothers who underwent vaginal delivery when compared to those who underwent caesarean section, as seen in Figure S3. The milk from the mothers who underwent vaginal delivery had higher levels of 3-hydroxybutyrate (p = 0.048) and LNFP III (p = 0.045), while the milk from the mothers who underwent caesarean section had higher relative abundances of butyrate (p = 0.043), ethanolamine (p = 0.004), proline (p = 0.018), and urea (p = 0.020). However, these differences depend on the country. In the present study, based on the mode of delivery, we found significant differences in 16 metabolites in the South African samples, 11 metabolites in the Spanish samples, four in the Finnish samples, and one in the Chinese samples, shown in Table 2, reflecting regional differences in terms of the impact of caesarean section on the milk metabolome.

3.3. Relationship between the NMR Metabolomic Profile and Milk Microbiota

In order to explore the interrelations between the human milk metabolites and the milk microbiota profile, Spearman’s rank correlations were determined and then represented in heat maps shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9. Urea and galactose were positively correlated (p < 0.05) with Alpha- and Betaproteobacteria and Bacilli, although they were negatively correlated (p < 0.05) with Gammaproteobacteria. Yet, a group of metabolites were found to be positively correlated (p < 0.05) with Gammaproteobacteria, including lactate, creatine, proline, lacto-N-fucopentaose I, and 2-fucosyllactose VLDL, although they negatively correlated (p < 0.05) with Alpha- and Betaproteobacteria and Bacilli.
The Actinobacteria in the human breast milk were positively correlated (p < 0.05) with uridine, but negatively correlated with lacto-N-fucopentaose I, 2-fucosyllactose acetate, and spermidine (p < 0.05) as seen in Figure 8.
A few significant associations were found between the bacterial groups and HMOs, namely those related to fucosyl-α-1,4-N-acetylglucosamine, lactodifucotetraose, lacto-N-fucopentaose III, lacto-N-fucopentaose I, and 2-fucosyllactose, shown in Figure 9.

4. Discussion

There is growing research interest in identifying and understanding the bioactive compounds found in human breast milk. The field of infant nutrition research is evolving and new methodologies are being developed to support exact knowledge concerning the composition of human milk. Moreover, a few prior studies have reported the composition of human milk using NMR-based metabolomics [1,7,19,20]. In this study, a total of 68 metabolites were identified in mature human milk. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report the distinct milk metabolomics profile across different geographical locations, as well as to associate the complex interactions with human milk microbes. Spanish samples presented higher dispersion that was no associated with differences in maternal characteristics such as parity, age, or BMI between samples. Future studies to find the origin of this variability will be needed.
Different mode of delivery (vaginal vs caesarean section) influences the milk metabolite profile across locations. This study hence shows for the first time regional differences in the impact of caesarean section on human milk metabolites. The effect of caesarean section on the milk metabolome is dependent on the geographical region, with changes in different metabolites depending on the country. We suggest that the clinical intervention during caesarean and the alterations in the physiological and hormonal signals produced during normal vaginal delivery, would affected the milk metabolite profiles as already showed for milk microbiota [9]. In addition, we observed that the impact of the mode of delivery vary among geographical locations, maybe due to differences in the clinical procedures and antibiotic use [9].
Previous studies have shown inter-individual variations in human milk in terms of the macronutrients [21]. With regard to the metabolites, some of them, such as lactose, myo-inositol, and urea, have been reported to be conserved among mothers due to their important roles in infant growth and development, while those metabolites related to the genetic background or maternal diet are more variable, including HMOs, amino acids, choline, and vitamins [1,20]. No significant changes were found in the lactose and myo-inositol levels in relation to the geographical location and mode of delivery in this study, which suggests the strict regulation by the mammary gland, as has been proposed previously [1]. Yet, previous studies have found significant differences with regard to urea. For instance, Smilowitz et al. [1] analyzed 52 human milk samples collected at day 90 postpartum. They found that urea was one of the most abundant metabolites in human milk, and they further reported low variability between mothers, which suggested regulation at the level of the mammary gland, as well as an important role in developing infants as a source of nitrogen for intestinal microbiota. In the present study, the samples collected at day 30 postpartum showed differences in urea at different geographical locations in addition to relatively high variability. This may indicate differences in the regulation of the mammary gland depending on the number of days postpartum, as well as the influence of external factors, such as meat and dairy intake, or physical activity, during the early stages of lactation. The differences in the urea composition across the different geographical locations could also reflect variation in the gut microbiota composition of infants from the different locations [9,22,23]. A positive correlation between the colonic urea-nitrogen metabolism and the bifidobacteria concentration has previously been reported [24], although this association between the nitrogenated compounds and bifidobacteria might start early. We identified positive correlation between the nitrogenated compounds, such as urea, and uridine and Actinobacteria.
Similarly to urea, riboflavin has previously been reported to be a stable milk constituent in well-nourished mothers during the first month of lactation [19], although in the present study, its level varied with geographical locations. These differences might be explained by differences in maternal diet [20], and it might be extrapolated to other milk metabolites.
When compared with the other constituents, fat has previously been classified as the most variable component of breast milk due to being influenced by the time of day, inter-feeding interval, point of sampling during a feeding, stage of lactation, maternal weight, and differences between breasts [25]. In the present study, the differences in the LDL and VLDL in the milk might be partially explained by dietary impacts [26] or genetic factors, as previously reported [27]. However, their role in infant nutrition remains unclear, and the fatty acid content and their composition inside the lipoproteins might be more important for the infant than the content of lipoprotein particles. A recent study has shown the difference in the lipidomic profile across countries [9]. In this study, the lipid composition, particularly that of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), differed between the countries, with the highest level being observed in the case of omega-6 PUFA in Chinese women.
Human milk oligosaccharides, which are the third most abundant component in human milk [28,29], are a group of complex sugars that are non-digestible by infants. These HMOs contain a lactose core bound to one or more glucose, galactose, N-acetylglucosamine, fucose, or sialic acid residues [30]. HMOs support the competitive growth of beneficial bacterial strains within the intestine [29], inhibit the adhesion of pathogens to the infant’s epithelium, and interact directly with host immune cells [30]. Each HMO fulfils different roles and activities, and each is metabolized by different bacteria [31]. In addition, specific HMOs could render epithelial cells more resistant to bacterial colonization, and they can interact with immune cells in order to reduce the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines [32]. This means that differences in the HMOs between geographical locations may result in different roles for human milk in relation to infant health and development. It has been suggested that HMO concentrations and profiles may vary geographically [16,32]. The present study confirmed significant differences in both sugars and HMOs between countries, which was also revealed by a study by McGuire et al. [16]. Their study revealed that milk from Sweden contained more than four times more 3-fucosyllactose (3FL) and lower disialyllacto-N-tetraose than milk collected in rural Gambia. Similarly, our study showed significant differences in the 3FL, lacto-N-fucopentaose III (LNFPIII), lacto-N-fucopentaose I (LNFPI), and 2-fucosyllactose (2FL) levels. The HMO profile and specific oligosaccharides, such as 2FL, have also been linked to infant body composition and growth [33], the survival of children born to HIV-infected mothers [34], and allergic morbidity such as a cow milk protein allergy [33]. Furthermore, it was previously reported that specific HMOs, such as LNFPI and 3′-sialyllactose, were associated with infant morbidity and growth development, respectively, and at the same time, correlated with specific microbiota [31]. Another prior study reported an association between the total HMO concentrations and Actinobacteria (mainly Bifidobacterium spp.) counts [35]. More specifically, it was reported that B. breve was positively correlated with sialylated HMOs, while B. longum was positively correlated with non-fucosylated/non-sialylated HMOs. Furthermore, the same study reported positive correlations between fucosylated HMOs and the classes Verrucomicrobiae (Akkermansia muciniphila) and Bacilli, mainly Staphylococcus aureus [35]. Our results thus support the available, albeit limited, data concerning the complex interactions between microbiota and HMOs during lactation, with significant associations being found between the bacterial groups and fucosyl-α-1,4-N-acetylglucosamine, lactodifucotetraose, LNFPIII, LNFPI, and 2FL. According to this study, geographical variations and changes in the metabolomics profile of human milk following caesarean section may involve differences in the protective activities of HMOs.
Previous studies have indicated that the neonatal primary gut colonizers include acetate- and lactate-producing bacteria from the classes Actinobacteria (Bifidobacterium), Bacteroidia (Bacteroides) and Bacilli (Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, and Enterococcus) [36]. These bacteria have also been found to be present in human breast milk in its viable form [37,38]. In this study, higher amounts of lactate, followed by acetate and propionate, were detected in the human milk samples across locations. The origin of this lactate may be both the mammary tissue and/or milk microbiota. In the mammary gland, lactate serves as an intermediate in carbohydrates metabolism [39], while lactate and acetate are intermediate fermentation products of the microbial metabolism [40,41]. The present study found significant differences in the acetate and lactate levels between locations, which were also correlated with several bacterial groups. The impact of milk lactate on infant health is not yet known, although recent studies have suggested that lactate must be efficiently metabolized during early life in order to avoid the potential negative consequences of lactate accumulation as acidosis, neurotoxicity, and cardiac arrhythmia [42]. In addition, it is known that acetate is a product of Bifidobacterium metabolism, and it serves to promote the defense functions of the host cells and exert a protective effect against infection [43]. It has also been established that acetate and lactate produced by Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus contribute to SCFA-mediated health effects, although these two microorganisms do not directly produce butyrate and/or propionate [43,44].
Interestingly, ethanol was also identified in the breast milk samples analyzed in our study. Considering that mothers do not generally drink alcoholic beverages during lactation, the presence of this compound in small amounts in human milk might be a consequence of milk microbiota metabolism. Many microorganisms, including bacteria and yeasts, produce ethanol as the major fermentation product of carbohydrates. Furthermore, recent studies have reported the presence of yeasts, such as Saccharomyces and Candida, in breast milk samples obtained from healthy women [45], and the presence of ethanol in milk might be a product of their metabolism.
It has previously been reported that specific interactions take place between milk microbes and other milk components, including macro- and micro-nutrients as well as milk cells [8,10]. In this study, we found a group of metabolites to be positively correlated with Gammaproteobacteria, including lactate, creatine, proline, lacto-N-fucopentaose I, and 2-fucosyllactose VLDL, as well as negatively correlated with Alpha- and Betaproteobacteria, and Bacilli.
The major limitation of this study is that we were unable to determine the effect of geographical location and caesarean section alone on the milk metabolome without the influence of other confounding variables (e.g., gestational age, diet, lifestyle, secretor status). To do so, future studies involving higher sample sizes and controlling for such variables should be performed. Despite this limitation, the present study contributes important information regarding regional variations in human milk metabolites, the impact of caesarean section, and the correlation of milk metabolites with milk microbiota. Understanding both the composition and function of the components of milk is vital to infant health. The data obtained from this study could form the basis for future studies concerning the milk metabolome and their contribution to infant health and development.
Taken together, ethnicity, diet, environment, and lifestyle could partially explain the different NMR metabolomic profiles seen in this study. It is well-known that diet influences the human metabolomics profile in the blood [46], urine [47], tissues [47], and fecal supernatants [48], and something similar may be expected in human milk. Moreover, only a few studies have investigated the relationships among the human milk microbiota and milk constituents [12,14]. Our findings confirm prior evidence showing that complex bacterial communities within milk are associated with variations in the nutritional composition and metabolites profiles [9,15].

5. Conclusions

By means of NMR, we detected 68 metabolites in human milk sampled one month postpartum. The concentrations of carbohydrates, amino acids, short-chain fatty acids, and other metabolites reflected the external environment, that is, the geographical location. In addition, the internal environment, namely the mode of delivery, also impacted the metabolite profile. Our findings support the hypothesis that human milk metabolites from healthy women vary across locations. Shifts on metabolites are associated to milk microbiota profiles suggesting a complex interlink between milk compounds. It is known that breast-feeding provides a personalized infant nutrition driving the infant gut development, immune system maturation and metabolic activities. Climate, lifestyle, environmental exposure, circadian rhythms, ethnic origin, population-specific variations and genetics would have an impact on metabolite profile explaining some of the variation observed in this study and request further research. Furthermore, our study highlights the potential interactions between human milk metabolites and microbes.
Therefore, we need to understand the pivotal relationship between environment-host-nutrition during pregnancy, lactation and early infancy due its impact for human health. This knowledge would enable the design personalized interventions to modulate milk bioactive compounds to be transferred through breastfeeding to the infants. Our data highlight the need for controlled- large-scale human studies across locations and the need to associated changes on milk bioactive compounds to infant growth, development, and health outcomes.
On this basis, we suggest the hypothesis that breast milk provides optimal immunological and metabolic guidance to the extrauterine world, although the differences reported between the locations and modes of delivery in terms of the metabolite composition might involve variations in infant development.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/10/10/1355/s1, Table S1: Age and pre-pregnancy body max index (BMI) of the participants in the study. Height was measured during the first visit at hospital and weight was self-reported, Table S2: Significantly (p < 0.05) spearman’s rank-order correlation between metabolites and maternal characteristics, Figure S1: Principal component analysis (PCA) scores plot (A) and loadings of the first principal component (B) and second principal component (C) scaling NMR data from all participant countries. Countries are indicated as red diamonds (China), green squares (Finland), navy blue triangles (Spain), pale blue triangles (South Africa), Figure S2: Principal component analysis (PCA) scores plot (A) and loadings of the first principal component (B) and second principal component (C) scaling NMR data from all participant countries without Spain. Countries are indicated as red diamonds (China), green squares (Finland), pale blue triangles (South Africa), Figure S3: Box and whisker plot showing statistical significant differences in metabolityes in breast milk samples after vaginal or caesarean delivery. LNFP III: lacto-N-fucopentaose III. Mann-Whitney U test significant level was considered at 0.05. Each bar represents the smallest observation, lower quartile (Q1), median, upper quartile (Q3) and largest observation. Circles and stars indicate outlier data.

Author Contributions

M.C.C. and S.S. conceived the idea and designed the study. J.M.M. carried out metabolomics data analysis and C.G.-G. analyzed metabolomics data, combined with microbiota, and wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the interpretation of data, critically reviewed the manuscript for intellectual content and approved the final version.

Funding

This work has been funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (ERC Starting Grant, project no. 639226). DM gratefully acknowledges financial support from the JPI HDHL (GUTMOM project) and the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades from Spain (PCIN-2017-117 and SAF2014-52875R), and also from the ‘Instituto de Salud Carlos III and co-funded by FEDER founds’ (grant number PIE15/00013).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for all the participant families providing biological samples for this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Smilowitz, J.T.; O’Sullivan, A.; Barile, D.; German, J.B.; Lonnerdal, B.; Slupsky, C.M. The human milk metabolome reveals diverse oligosaccharide profiles. J. Nutr. 2013, 143, 1709–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Stuebe, A. The risks of not breastfeeding for mothers and infants. Rev. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009, 2, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Lodge, C.J.; Tan, D.J.; Lau, M.X.; Dai, X.; Tham, R.; Lowe, A.J.; Bowatte, G.; Allen, K.J.; Dharmage, S.C. Breastfeeding and asthma and allergies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2015, 104, 38–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Luccioli, S.; Zhang, Y.; Verrill, L.; Ramos-Valle, M.; Kwegyir-Afful, E. Infant feeding practices and reported food allergies at 6 years of age. Pediatrics 2014, 134 (Suppl. 1), S21–S28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jwa, S.C.; Fujiwara, T.; Kondo, N. Latent protective effects of breastfeeding on late childhood overweight and obesity: A nationwide prospective study. Obesity 2014, 22, 1527–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Marseglia, L.; Manti, S.; D’Angelo, G.; Cuppari, C.; Salpietro, V.; Filippelli, M.; Trovato, A.; Gitto, E.; Salpietro, C.; Arrigo, T. Obesity and breastfeeding: The strength of association. Women Birth 2015, 28, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Longini, M.; Tataranno, M.L.; Proietti, F.; Tortoriello, M.; Belvisi, E.; Vivi, A.; Tassini, M.; Perrone, S.; Buonocore, G. A metabolomic study of preterm and term human and formula milk by proton MRS analysis: Preliminary results. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014, 27 (Suppl. 2), 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Williams, J.E.; Price, W.J.; Shafii, B.; Yahvah, K.M.; Bode, L.; McGuire, M.A.; McGuire, M.K. Relationships among microbial communities, maternal cells, oligosaccharides, and macronutrients in human milk. J. Hum. Lact. 2017, 33, 540–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kumar, H.; du Toit, E.; Kulkarni, A.; Aakko, J.; Linderborg, K.M.; Yumei, Z.; Nicol, M.P.; Isolauri, E.; Yang, B.; Collado, M.C.; et al. Distinct patterns in human milk microbiota and fatty acid profiles across specific geographic locations. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Boix-Amoros, A.; Collado, M.C.; Mira, A. Relationship between milk microbiota, bacterial load, macronutrients, and human cells during lactation. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Munblit, D.; Boyle, R.J.; Warner, J.O. Factors affecting breast milk composition and potential consequences for development of the allergic phenotype. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2015, 45, 583–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chung, M.Y. Factors affecting human milk composition. Pediatr. Neonatol. 2014, 55, 421–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ballard, O.; Morrow, A.L. Human milk composition nutrients and bioactive factors. Pediatr. Clin. N. Am. 2013, 60, 49–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yuhas, R.; Pramuk, K.; Lien, E.L. Human milk fatty acid composition from nine countries varies most in DHA. Lipids 2006, 41, 851–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gomez-Gallego, C.; Kumar, H.; Garcia-Mantrana, I.; du Toit, E.; Suomela, J.P.; Linderborg, K.M.; Zhang, Y.; Isolauri, E.; Yang, B.; Salminen, S.; et al. Breast milk polyamines and microbiota interactions: Impact of mode of delivery and geographical location. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2017, 70, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. McGuire, M.K.; Meehan, C.L.; McGuire, M.A.; Williams, J.E.; Foster, J.; Sellen, D.W.; Kamau-Mbuthia, E.W.; Kamundia, E.W.; Mbugua, S.; Moore, S.E.; et al. What’s normal? Oligosaccharide concentrations and profiles in milk produced by healthy women vary geographically. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 105, 1086–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Li, S.W.; Watanabe, K.; Hsu, C.C.; Chao, S.H.; Yang, Z.H.; Lin, Y.J.; Chen, C.C.; Cao, Y.M.; Huang, H.C.; Chang, C.H.; et al. Bacterial composition and diversity in breast milk samples from mothers living in Taiwan and mainland China. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wishart, D.S.; Feunang, Y.D.; Marcu, A.; Guo, A.C.; Liang, K.; Vazquez-Fresno, R.; Sajed, T.; Johnson, D.; Li, C.; Karu, N.; et al. HMDB 4.0: The human metabolome database for 2018. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, D608–D617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Sundekilde, U.K.; Downey, E.; O’Mahony, J.A.; O’Shea, C.A.; Ryan, C.A.; Kelly, A.L.; Bertram, H.C. The effect of gestational and lactational age on the human milk metabolome. Nutrients 2016, 8, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Spevacek, A.R.; Smilowitz, J.T.; Chin, E.L.; Underwood, M.A.; German, J.B.; Slupsky, C.M. Infant maturity at birth reveals minor differences in the maternal milk metabolome in the first month of lactation. J. Nutr. 2015, 145, 1698–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Mitoulas, L.R.; Kent, J.C.; Cox, D.B.; Owens, R.A.; Sherriff, J.L.; Hartmann, P.E. Variation in fat, lactose and protein in human milk over 24 h and throughout the first year of lactation. Br. J. Nutr. 2002, 88, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kuang, Y.S.; Li, S.H.; Guo, Y.; Lu, J.H.; He, J.R.; Luo, B.J.; Jiang, F.J.; Shen, H.; Papasian, C.J.; Pang, H.; et al. Composition of gut microbiota in infants in china and global comparison. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 36666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Fallani, M.; Young, D.; Scott, J.; Norin, E.; Amarri, S.; Adam, R.; Aguilera, M.; Khanna, S.; Gil, A.; Edwards, C.A.; et al. Intestinal microbiota of 6-week-old infants across europe: Geographic influence beyond delivery mode, breast-feeding, and antibiotics. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2010, 51, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. De Preter, V.; Vanhoutte, T.; Huys, G.; Swings, J.; Rutgeerts, P.; Verbeke, K. Effect of lactulose and Saccharomyces boulardii administration on the colonic urea-nitrogen metabolism and the bifidobacteria concentration in healthy human subjects. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2006, 23, 963–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dror, D.K.; Allen, L.H. Overview of nutrients in human milk. Adv. Nutr. 2018, 9, 278s–294s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Jegou, M.; Gondret, F.; Lalande-Martin, J.; Tea, I.; Baeza, E.; Louveau, I. NMR-based metabolomics highlights differences in plasma metabolites in pigs exhibiting diet-induced differences in adiposity. Eur. J. Nutr. 2016, 55, 1189–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Garcia-Rios, A.; Perez-Martinez, P.; Mata, P.; Fuentes, F.; Lopez-Miranda, J.; Alonso, R.; Caballero, J.; Mata, N.; Perez-Jimenez, F.; Ordovas, J.M. Polymorphism at the TRIB1 gene modulates plasma lipid levels: Insight from the Spanish familial hypercholesterolemia cohort study. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2011, 21, 957–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Meredith-Dennis, L.; Xu, G.; Goonatilleke, E.; Lebrilla, C.B.; Underwood, M.A.; Smilowitz, J.T. Composition and variation of macronutrients, immune proteins, and human milk oligosaccharides in human milk from nonprofit and commercial milk banks. J. Hum. Lact. 2018, 34, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Chaturvedi, P.; Warren, C.D.; Altaye, M.; Morrow, A.L.; Ruiz-Palacios, G.; Pickering, L.K.; Newburg, D.S. Fucosylated human milk oligosaccharides vary between individuals and over the course of lactation. Glycobiology 2001, 11, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Kunz, C.; Rudloff, S.; Baier, W.; Klein, N.; Strobel, S. Oligosaccharides in human milk: Structural, functional, and metabolic aspects. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2000, 20, 699–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Davis, J.C.; Lewis, Z.T.; Krishnan, S.; Bernstein, R.M.; Moore, S.E.; Prentice, A.M.; Mills, D.A.; Lebrilla, C.B.; Zivkovic, A.M. Growth and morbidity of Gambian infants are influenced by maternal milk oligosaccharides and infant gut microbiota. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Thurl, S.; Munzert, M.; Boehm, G.; Matthews, C.; Stahl, B. Systematic review of the concentrations of oligosaccharides in human milk. Nutr. Rev. 2017, 75, 920–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Sprenger, N.; Lee, L.Y.; De Castro, C.A.; Steenhout, P.; Thakkar, S.K. Longitudinal change of selected human milk oligosaccharides and association to infants’ growth, an observatory, single center, longitudinal cohort study. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kuhn, L.; Kim, H.Y.; Hsiao, L.; Nissan, C.; Kankasa, C.; Mwiya, M.; Thea, D.M.; Aldrovandi, G.M.; Bode, L. Oligosaccharide composition of breast milk influences survival of uninfected children born to HIV-infected mothers in Lusaka, Zambia. J. Nutr. 2015, 145, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Aakko, J.; Kumar, H.; Rautava, S.; Wise, A.; Autran, C.; Bode, L.; Isolauri, E.; Salminen, S. Human milk oligosaccharide categories define the microbiota composition in human colostrum. Benef. Microbes 2017, 8, 563–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. De Vadder, F.; Kovatcheva-Datchary, P.; Goncalves, D.; Vinera, J.; Zitoun, C.; Duchampt, A.; Backhed, F.; Mithieux, G. Microbiota-generated metabolites promote metabolic benefits via gut-brain neural circuits. Cell 2014, 156, 84–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Martin, R.; Langa, S.; Reviriego, C.; Jiminez, E.; Marin, M.L.; Xaus, J.; Fernandez, L.; Rodriguez, J.M. Human milk is a source of lactic acid bacteria for the infant gut. J. Pediatr. 2003, 143, 754–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Solis, G.; de Los Reyes-Gavilan, C.G.; Fernandez, N.; Margolles, A.; Gueimonde, M. Establishment and development of lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria microbiota in breast-milk and the infant gut. Anaerobe 2010, 16, 307–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Mohammad, M.A.; Maningat, P.; Sunehag, A.L.; Haymond, M.W. Precursors of hexoneogenesis within the human mammary gland. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 308, E680–E687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Belenguer, A.; Duncan, S.H.; Calder, A.G.; Holtrop, G.; Louis, P.; Lobley, G.E.; Flint, H.J. Two routes of metabolic cross-feeding between bifidobacterium adolescentis and butyrate-producing anaerobes from the human gut. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 3593–3599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Schwab, C.; Ganzle, M. Lactic acid bacteria fermentation of human milk oligosaccharide components, human milk oligosaccharides and galactooligosaccharides. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2011, 315, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ewaschuk, J.B.; Naylor, J.M.; Zello, G.A. D-lactate in human and ruminant metabolism. J. Nutr. 2005, 135, 1619–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Fukuda, S.; Toh, H.; Taylor, T.D.; Ohno, H.; Hattori, M. Acetate-producing bifidobacteria protect the host from enteropathogenic infection via carbohydrate transporters. Gut Microbes 2012, 3, 449–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. O’Callaghan, A.; van Sinderen, D. Bifidobacteria and their role as members of the human gut microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Boix-Amorós, A.; Martinez-Costa, C.; Querol, A.; Collado, M.C.; Mira, A. Multiple approaches detect the presence of fungi in human breastmilk samples from healthy mothers. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Guertin, K.A.; Moore, S.C.; Sampson, J.N.; Huang, W.Y.; Xiao, Q.; Stolzenberg-Solomon, R.Z.; Sinha, R.; Cross, A.J. Metabolomics in nutritional epidemiology: Identifying metabolites associated with diet and quantifying their potential to uncover diet-disease relations in populations. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 100, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Playdon, M.C.; Sampson, J.N.; Cross, A.J.; Sinha, R.; Guertin, K.A.; Moy, K.A.; Rothman, N.; Irwin, M.L.; Mayne, S.T.; Stolzenberg-Solomon, R.; et al. Comparing metabolite profiles of habitual diet in serum and urine. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 104, 776–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Chow, J.; Panasevich, M.R.; Alexander, D.; Vester Boler, B.M.; Rossoni Serao, M.C.; Faber, T.A.; Bauer, L.L.; Fahey, G.C. Fecal metabolomics of healthy breast-fed versus formula-fed infants before and during in vitro batch culture fermentation. J. Proteome Res. 2014, 13, 2534–2542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nutrients 10 01355 g001 550
Figure 1. Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA) scores plot scaling nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data from all participant countries (A); participant countries without Spain (B). Countries are indicated as red diamonds (China), green squares (Finland), navy blue triangles (Spain), pale blue triangles (South Africa).
Figure 1. Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA) scores plot scaling nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data from all participant countries (A); participant countries without Spain (B). Countries are indicated as red diamonds (China), green squares (Finland), navy blue triangles (Spain), pale blue triangles (South Africa).
Nutrients 10 01355 g001
Nutrients 10 01355 g002 550
Figure 2. Box and whisker plot showing statistical significant differences in sugars and derivatives in breast milk obtained from China (red), Finland (green), Spain (blue) and South Africa (pale blue). Each bar represents the smallest observation, lower quartile (Q1), median, upper quartile (Q3) and largest observation. Differences among countries were calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Unlike letters indicate statistically significant differences among countries. Circles and stars indicate outlier data. 3′FL: 3-fucosyllactose; LNFP I + 2′FL: lacto-N-fucopentaose I and 2-fucosyllactose; LNDFHII: lacto-N-difucohexaose II; LNFP III: lacto-N-fucopentaose III. Data are expressed in relative units.
Figure 2. Box and whisker plot showing statistical significant differences in sugars and derivatives in breast milk obtained from China (red), Finland (green), Spain (blue) and South Africa (pale blue). Each bar represents the smallest observation, lower quartile (Q1), median, upper quartile (Q3) and largest observation. Differences among countries were calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Unlike letters indicate statistically significant differences among countries. Circles and stars indicate outlier data. 3′FL: 3-fucosyllactose; LNFP I + 2′FL: lacto-N-fucopentaose I and 2-fucosyllactose; LNDFHII: lacto-N-difucohexaose II; LNFP III: lacto-N-fucopentaose III. Data are expressed in relative units.
Nutrients 10 01355 g002
Nutrients 10 01355 g003 550
Figure 3. Box and whisker plot showing statistical significant differences in amino acids and derivatives in breast milk obtained from China (red), Finland (green), Spain (blue) and South Africa (pale blue). Data are expressed in relative units. Each bar represents the smallest observation, lower quartile (Q1), median, upper quartile (Q3) and largest observation. Differences among countries were calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Unlike letters indicate statistically significant differences among countries. Circles and stars indicate outlier data.
Figure 3. Box and whisker plot showing statistical significant differences in amino acids and derivatives in breast milk obtained from China (red), Finland (green), Spain (blue) and South Africa (pale blue). Data are expressed in relative units. Each bar represents the smallest observation, lower quartile (Q1), median, upper quartile (Q3) and largest observation. Differences among countries were calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Unlike letters indicate statistically significant differences among countries. Circles and stars indicate outlier data.
Nutrients 10 01355 g003
Nutrients 10 01355 g004 550
Figure 4. Box and whisker plot showing statistical significant differences in energy metabolites in breast milk in samples from China (red), Finland (green), Spain (blue) and South Africa (pale blue). Data are expressed in relative units. Each bar represents the smallest observation, lower quartile (Q1), median, upper quartile (Q3) and largest observation. Circles and stars indicate outlier data. Differences among countries were calculated using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Unlike letters indicate statistically significant differences among countries.
Figure 4. Box and whisker plot showing statistical significant differences in energy metabolites in breast milk in samples from China (red), Finland (green), Spain (blue) and South Africa (pale blue). Data are expressed in relative units. Each bar represents the smallest observation, lower quartile (Q1), median, upper quartile (Q3) and largest observation. Circles and stars indicate outlier data. Differences among countries were calculated using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Unlike letters indicate statistically significant differences among countries.
Nutrients 10 01355 g004
Nutrients 10 01355 g005 550
Figure 5. Box and whisker plot showing statistical significant differences in fatty acids and related metabolites in breast milk in samples from China (red), Finland (green), Spain (blue) and South Africa (pale blue). Data are expressed in relative units. Each bar represents the smallest observation, lower quartile (Q1), median, upper quartile (Q3) and largest observation. Circles and stars indicate outlier data. Differences among countries were calculated using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Unlike letters indicate statistically significant differences among countries. LDL and VLDL should be consider LDL- and VLDL-like particles with similar nuclear magnetic resonances (NMR), structure and mobility than plasma LDL and VLDL.
Figure 5. Box and whisker plot showing statistical significant differences in fatty acids and related metabolites in breast milk in samples from China (red), Finland (green), Spain (blue) and South Africa (pale blue). Data are expressed in relative units. Each bar represents the smallest observation, lower quartile (Q1), median, upper quartile (Q3) and largest observation. Circles and stars indicate outlier data. Differences among countries were calculated using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Unlike letters indicate statistically significant differences among countries. LDL and VLDL should be consider LDL- and VLDL-like particles with similar nuclear magnetic resonances (NMR), structure and mobility than plasma LDL and VLDL.
Nutrients 10 01355 g005
Nutrients 10 01355 g006 550
Figure 6. Box and whisker plot showing statistical significant differences in other metabolites in breast milk in samples from China (red), Finland (green), Spain (blue) and South Africa (pale bue). Data are expressed in relative units. Each bar represents the smallest observation, lower quartile (Q1), median, upper quartile (Q3) and largest observation. Circles and stars indicate outlier data. Differences among countries were calculated using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Unlike letters indicate statistically significant differences among countries.
Figure 6. Box and whisker plot showing statistical significant differences in other metabolites in breast milk in samples from China (red), Finland (green), Spain (blue) and South Africa (pale bue). Data are expressed in relative units. Each bar represents the smallest observation, lower quartile (Q1), median, upper quartile (Q3) and largest observation. Circles and stars indicate outlier data. Differences among countries were calculated using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Unlike letters indicate statistically significant differences among countries.
Nutrients 10 01355 g006
Nutrients 10 01355 g007 550
Figure 7. Partial least squares discriminant analysis scores plot scaling nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data from vaginal delivery samples (red) and caesarean section (green) from China (A), Finland (B), Spain (C), South Africa (D).
Figure 7. Partial least squares discriminant analysis scores plot scaling nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data from vaginal delivery samples (red) and caesarean section (green) from China (A), Finland (B), Spain (C), South Africa (D).
Nutrients 10 01355 g007
Nutrients 10 01355 g008 550
Figure 8. Heat map to show Spearman’s correlation between metabolites and microbiota composition at class level. Asterisk indicates statistically significant correlation at the level of (p < 0.05). LDL and VLDL should be considered LDL- and VLDL-like particles with similar nuclear magnetic resonances (NMR), structure and mobility than plasma LDL and VLDL.
Figure 8. Heat map to show Spearman’s correlation between metabolites and microbiota composition at class level. Asterisk indicates statistically significant correlation at the level of (p < 0.05). LDL and VLDL should be considered LDL- and VLDL-like particles with similar nuclear magnetic resonances (NMR), structure and mobility than plasma LDL and VLDL.
Nutrients 10 01355 g008
Nutrients 10 01355 g009 550
Figure 9. Heat map to show Spearman’s correlation between oligosaccharides (HMOs) and microbiota composition at class level. 3FL: 3-fucosyllactose; LNDFHII: Lacto-N-difucohexaose; F4G: Fucosyl-α-1,4-N-acetylglucosamine; LNFP III: lacto-N-fucopentaose; F3GN: Fucosyl-α-1,3-N-acetylglucosamine; LNDFH I: lacto-N-difucohexaose I; LNFP I: lacto-N-fucopentaose I; 2FL: 2-fucosyllactose; LDFT: lactodifucotetraose. Asterisk indicates statistically significant correlation at the level of (p < 0.05).
Figure 9. Heat map to show Spearman’s correlation between oligosaccharides (HMOs) and microbiota composition at class level. 3FL: 3-fucosyllactose; LNDFHII: Lacto-N-difucohexaose; F4G: Fucosyl-α-1,4-N-acetylglucosamine; LNFP III: lacto-N-fucopentaose; F3GN: Fucosyl-α-1,3-N-acetylglucosamine; LNDFH I: lacto-N-difucohexaose I; LNFP I: lacto-N-fucopentaose I; 2FL: 2-fucosyllactose; LDFT: lactodifucotetraose. Asterisk indicates statistically significant correlation at the level of (p < 0.05).
Nutrients 10 01355 g009
Table
Table 1. Human milk metabolites identified in breast milk samples and their probable origin. Chemical shifts in ppm are presented (in brackets).
Table 1. Human milk metabolites identified in breast milk samples and their probable origin. Chemical shifts in ppm are presented (in brackets).
MetaboliteOrigin
Amino acids and derivatives
2-Hydroxybutyrate (3.99)endogenous
2-Hydroxyisovalerate (0.95)endogenous
Alanine (1.47)endogenous
Anserine (8.91)diet
Creatinine (3.03)endogenous
Dimethylamine (2.72)endogenous
Glutamate (2.34)endogenous
Glutamine (2.47)endogenous
Carnitine (3.21)endogenous
Histidine (7.09)endogenous
Isoleucine (0.99)diet
Kynurenine (6.81)endogenous
Leucine (0.94)diet
Methionine (2.62)diet
Methyl-histidine (7.88)endogenous
N-Acetyl lysine (1.79)endogenous
Phenylalanine (7.36)endogenous
Proline (3.34)endogenous
Taurine (3.25)endogenous
Tryptophan (7.70)diet
Tyrosine (3.06)endogenous
Urea (5.77)endogenous
Valine (0.98)diet
Energy metabolites
3-hydroxybutyrate (1.17)endogenous
Citrate (2.69)endogenous
Creatine (3.01)endogenous
Creatine-phosphate (3.02)endogenous
Formate (8.44)endogenous
Lactate (1.32)endogenous
NADH (8.46)endogenous
Neurotransmitters, growth factors and second messengers
4-Aminobutyrate (2.29)endogenous
Putrescine (1.75)microbial
Spermidine (2.61)endogenous
Spermine (2.70)endogenous
Fatty acids and associated metabolites
4-Aminohippurate (2.29)endogenous
Acetate (1.91)endogenous
Acetylcholine (3.21)endogenous
Butyrate (2.16)microbial
Choline (4.06)diet
Ethanolamine (3.13)endogenous
Glycero-3-phosphocholine (3.22)endogenous
LDL * (1.29)endogenous
Phosphocholine (3.2)endogenous
VLDL * (1.27)endogenous
Sugars and derivatives
1,6-anhydro-B-glucose (5.44)diet
2-fucosyllactose (5.31)endogenous
3-fucosyllactose (5.37)endogenous
Arabinose (4.51)microbial
Fucosyl-α-1,3-N-acetylglucosamine (5.14)endogenous
Fucosyl-α-1,4-N-acetylglucosamine (5.01)endogenous
Fucose (4.55)endogenous
Galactose (4.57)endogenous
Glucose (3.23)endogenous
Glucose-1-phosphate (5.45)endogenous
Lactose (3.75)endogenous
Lactodifucotetraose (5.27)endogenous
Lacto-N-difucohexaose I (5.18)endogenous
Lacto-N-difucohexaose II (5.36)endogenous
Lacto-N-fucopentaose I (5.31)endogenous
Lacto-N-fucopentaose III (5.1)endogenous
Myo-inositol (4.05)endogenous
N-Acetylglucosamine (3.91)endogenous
Vitamins and nucleosides
Riboflavin (B2) (7.96)diet
Uridine (5.92)endogeonous
Others
Ethanol (1.16)diet
Hippurate (7.55)microbial
Propylene glycol (1.14)diet
Classification and probable origin inferred from “The Human Metabolome Database” [18]. Metabolites employed for statistical comparison are highlighted with bold letters. * LDL- and VLDL-like particles with similar NMR resonances, structure and mobility than plasma LDL and VLDL.
Table
Table 2. Significant differences by country (p-value) in specific metabolites in human milk after vaginal or caesarean delivery.
Table 2. Significant differences by country (p-value) in specific metabolites in human milk after vaginal or caesarean delivery.
MetaboliteChinaFinlandSpainSouth Africa
3-fucosyllactose0.7390.9710.190↑ 0.035 *
Alanine0.8530.7390.280↑ 0.022 *
Butyrate0.5790.5790.436↑ 0.006 *
Dimethylamine0.9710.035 *↑ 0.035 *0.002 *
Ethanolamine0.6310.579↑ 0.000 *0.661
Formate↑ 0.035 *0.6840.7960.006 *
Fucosyl-α-1,4-N-acetylglucosamine0.6310.035 *0.2470.002 *
Galactose0.5790.5790.481↑ 0.002 *
Hippurate0.6840.063↑ 0.009 *0.022 *
Kynurenine0.1430.075↑ 0.011 *0.028 *
Lactodifucotetraose0.247↑ 0.035 *0.2470.447
Leucine0.631↑ 0.043 *↑ 0.009 *1.000
Lacto-N-fucopentaose I and 2-fucosyllactose0.3531.0000.9710.035 *
Lacto-N-fucopentaose III0.5790.7960.6310.001 *
Methyl-histidine0.3530.684↑ 0.023 *0.043 *
Phosphocholine and acetylcholine0.3930.7961.0000.002 *
Proline0.3930.739↑ 0.002 *1.000
Propylene glycol0.9120.089↑ 0.023 *0.004 *
Riboflavin0.5290.353↑ 0.002 *0.400
Spermidine0.5790.353↑ 0.000 *0.604
Spermine0.1430.3150.8530.003 *
Urea0.4360.2470.2800.000 *
Uridine0.5290.9120.019 *0.243
* indicate p-values < 0.05. ↑ indicate significant higher levels in milk from caesarean section donors.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gómez-Gallego, C.; Morales, J.M.; Monleón, D.; Du Toit, E.; Kumar, H.; Linderborg, K.M.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, B.; Isolauri, E.; Salminen, S.; et al. Human Breast Milk NMR Metabolomic Profile across Specific Geographical Locations and Its Association with the Milk Microbiota. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1355. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10101355

AMA Style

Gómez-Gallego C, Morales JM, Monleón D, Du Toit E, Kumar H, Linderborg KM, Zhang Y, Yang B, Isolauri E, Salminen S, et al. Human Breast Milk NMR Metabolomic Profile across Specific Geographical Locations and Its Association with the Milk Microbiota. Nutrients. 2018; 10(10):1355. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10101355

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gómez-Gallego, Carlos, Jose Manuel Morales, Daniel Monleón, Elloise Du Toit, Himanshu Kumar, Kaisa M. Linderborg, Yumei Zhang, Baoru Yang, Erika Isolauri, Seppo Salminen, and et al. 2018. "Human Breast Milk NMR Metabolomic Profile across Specific Geographical Locations and Its Association with the Milk Microbiota" Nutrients 10, no. 10: 1355. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10101355

APA Style

Gómez-Gallego, C., Morales, J. M., Monleón, D., Du Toit, E., Kumar, H., Linderborg, K. M., Zhang, Y., Yang, B., Isolauri, E., Salminen, S., & Collado, M. C. (2018). Human Breast Milk NMR Metabolomic Profile across Specific Geographical Locations and Its Association with the Milk Microbiota. Nutrients, 10(10), 1355. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10101355

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop