Next Article in Journal
Acute Post-Prandial Cognitive Effects of Brown Seaweed Extract in Humans
Next Article in Special Issue
Diets Rich in Fruits and Vegetables Are Associated with Lower Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Adolescents
Previous Article in Journal
Rational Management of Iron-Deficiency Anaemia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dietary Patterns in European and Brazilian Adolescents: Comparisons and Associations with Socioeconomic Factors
Open AccessArticle

Validation of a Rapid Method to Assess Habitual Beverage Intake Patterns

1
Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, 295 West Campus Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
2
Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Virginia, Cancer Center without Walls at the UVA Cancer Center, 16 East Main St, Christiansburg, VA 24073, USA
3
Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech; Kiyah Duffey Consulting, Inc., 1807 Asher Lane, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2018, 10(1), 83; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10010083
Received: 29 November 2017 / Revised: 30 December 2017 / Accepted: 9 January 2018 / Published: 13 January 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dietary Patterns, Diet Quality and Human Health)
The Healthy Beverage Index (HBI) is an emerging approach to assess beverage pattern quality. HBI total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater adherence to proposed beverage recommendations. However, assessing patterns is resource-intensive due to the need for extensive dietary data, typically 24-h dietary records or recalls. The BEVQ-15, a beverage intake questionnaire, may be used as an alternative method to rapidly measure HBI scores. The objective of this cross-sectional investigation is to assess the comparative validity of the HBI-Q, a method to rapidly assess HBI scores via the BEVQ-15, as compared to the traditional method of deriving HBI scores via dietary recalls/records. Between 2012 and 2016, a cross-sectional sample of adults in southwest Virginia completed three 24-h dietary recalls (30–60 min administration and analysis time per recall) and the BEVQ-15 (3–4 min administration time). HBI scores were generated by both methods, and compared via paired-samples t-tests, correlations, and Bland–Altman analysis. Among 404 adults (mean age = 40 years), total mean HBI scores were 63.7 from the HBI-Q and 67.3 from the recalls (mean difference = 3.6 out of 100; r = 0.63; both p ≤ 0.001). Agreement between the two methods for total HBI scores via Bland–Altman plots was 92%. Using the HBI-Q to rapidly assess HBI scores in adults will increase the utility of the HBI by decreasing the time and resources required, thus allowing researchers and practitioners to provide targeted feedback for improvement. View Full-Text
Keywords: beverages; beverage quality; dietary patterns; dietary assessment; food frequency questionnaire beverages; beverage quality; dietary patterns; dietary assessment; food frequency questionnaire
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Hedrick, V.E.; Myers, E.A.; Zoellner, J.M.; Duffey, K.J.; Davy, B.M. Validation of a Rapid Method to Assess Habitual Beverage Intake Patterns. Nutrients 2018, 10, 83.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop