Particle Size Characteristics at the Top of Biomass Burning Plumes Based on Two Case Studies
Highlights
- By utilizing CGOM-C/SGLI data, we derived the plume top characteristics (geometric height, optical properties, or their relation) of biomass burning aerosols (BBA) due to large-scale wildfires.
- It was found that BBA size decreases with plume altitude, and this finding was validated by SGLI polarization data and Radiative Transfer calculations.
- By understanding the detailed characteristics at the top of the plume, it is possible to predict the advection and lifetime of the BBA plume.
- The algorithm and results proposed in this study can be applied to the monitoring of aerosol disasters, including not only BBA plumes but also dust events, volcanic eruptions, and high-concentration PM pollution.
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. SGLI Observations
2.2. CTM Simulations
2.3. Overview of the Methodology
3. Result
3.1. California Forest Fires in September 2020
3.1.1. Characterization of BBA in the Plume Top
3.1.2. The Presence of Small Particles Implied from Polarized Reflectance
3.1.3. Sequential Changes of BBA Plume with GOES
3.2. Sumatra Peatland Fires in September 2019
3.2.1. Retrieval of Optical Properties of BBA Plume
3.2.2. Characterization of BBA Plume Top Height
3.3. Summary of Two Case Studies
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| AAI | Absorption aerosol index |
| AE | Ångström Exponent |
| AERONET | AErosol RObotic NETwork |
| AOT | Aerosol Optical Thickness |
| AOD | Aerosol Optical Depth |
| BBA | Biomass burning aerosols |
| BC | Black carbon |
| CCD | Charge Coupled Device |
| CTM | Chemical transport model |
| GCOM-C | Global Change Observation Mission-C |
| GOES | Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite |
| IR | Infrared |
| MISR | Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer |
| PRI | Polarized radiance index |
| RT | Radiative transfer |
| SCALE | Scalable Computing for Advanced Library and the Environment Regional Model |
| SGLI | Second-generation Global Imager |
| SSA | Single Scattering Albedo |
| UV | Ultraviolet |
Appendix A. Vector Radiative Transfer Calculation of Reflectance from the Top of the Atmosphere

- R-ref and P-ref are proportional to f,
- R-ref and P-ref increase with AOT but converge at a certain AOT.
- The converging AOT point is lower for a smaller f,
- After convergence (i.e., reaching the maximum point), R-ref is invariable. Although the value and slope change with the variable, the approximate shape of the R-ref function remains unchanged.
- After reaching its maximum value, P-ref shows a slight decrease along with the AOT owing to the reduction in polarizability caused by multiple light scattering.
- The numerical results for both wavelengths are compared as follows:
- For R-ref, no noticeable effect was observed on the absolute value, change in AOT, or change in f.
- P-ref changes differently at the two wavelengths. P-ref (869 nm) exhibits a larger variation with respect to AOT and f than P-ref (674 nm).
References
- Chow, F.; Yu, K.; Young, A.; James, E.; Grell, G.; Csiszar, I.; Tsidulko, M.; Freitas, S.; Pereira, G.; Giglio, L.; et al. High-Resolution Smoke Forecasting for the 2018 Camp Fire in California. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2022, 103, E1531–E1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makar, P.; Akingunola, A.; Chen, J.; Pabla, B.; Gong, W.; Stroud, C.; Sioris, C.; Anderson, K.; Cheung, P.; Zhang, J.; et al. Forest fire aerosol-weather feedback over western North America using a high-resolution, fully coupled, air quality model. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2021, 21, 10557–10587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakata, M.; Sano, I.; Mukai, S.; Kokhanovsky, A. Characterization of wildfire smoke over complex terrain using satellite observations, ground-based observations, and meteorological models. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.C.; Pereira, G.; Uhl, S.A.; Bravo, M.A.; Bell, M.L. A systematic review of the physical health impacts from non-occupational exposure to wildfire smoke. Environ. Res. 2025, 136, 120–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reid, C.E.; Brauer, M.; Johnston, F.H.; Jerrett, M.; Balmes, J.R.; Elliott, C.T. Critical review of health impacts of wildfire smoke exposure. Environ. Health Perspect. 2016, 124, 1334–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cascio, W.E. Wildland fire smoke and human health. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 624, 586–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dickman, K. The hidden toll of wildfire. Sci. Am. 2020, 322, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IPCC. Climate Change 2021, The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Hein, L.; Spadaro, J.V.; Oatro, B.; Hammer, M.; Sumarga, E.; Salmayenti, R.; Boer, R.; Tata, H.; Atmoko, D.; Castañeda, J. The health impacts of Indonesia peatland fires. Environ. Health 2022, 21, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Laat, A.; Vazquez-Navarro, M.; Theys, N.; Stammes, P. Analysis of properties of the 19 February 2018 volcanic eruption of mount Sinabung in S5P/TROPOMI and Himawari-8 satellite data. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2020, 20, 1203–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, I.A.; Grainger, R.G.; Prata, A.T.; Proud, S.R.; Mather, T.A.; Pyle, D.M. A satellite chronology of plumes from the April 2021 eruption of la Soufrière. St Vincent. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2023, 23, 15209–15234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kilian, M.; Grewe1, V.; Jöckel1, P.; Kerkweg, A.; Mertens1, M.; Zahn, A.; Ziereis1, H. Ozone source attribution in polluted European areas during summer 2017 as simulated with MECO (n). Atmos. Chem. Phys 2024, 24, 13503–13523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muller, J.P.; Mandanayake, A.; Moroney, C.; Davies, R.; Diner, D.J.; Paradise, S. MISR stereoscopic image matchers: Techniques and results. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2002, 40, 1547–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kahn, R.A.; Li, W.-H.; Moroney, C.; Diner, D.J.; Martonchik, J.V.; Fishbein, E. Aerosol source plume physical characteristics from space-based multi-angle imaging. J. Geophys. Res. 2007, 112, D11205. [Google Scholar]
- Kahn, R.A.; Chen, Y.; Nelson, D.L.; Leung, F.-Y.; Li, Q.; Diner, D.J.; Logan, J.A. Wildfire smoke injection heights: Two perspectives from space. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2008, 35, L04809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Limbacher, E.; Kahn, A.; Lee, J. The new MISR research aerosol retrieval algorithm: A multi-angle, multi-spectral, bounded-variable least squares retrieval of aerosols particle properties over both land and water. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2022, 15, 6865–6887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diner, D.J.; Beckert, J.C.; Reilly, T.H.; Bruegge, C.J.; Conel, J.E.; Kahn, R.A.; Martonchik, J.V.; Ackerman, T.P.; Davies, R.; Gerstl, S.A.; et al. Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR)—Instrument description and experiment overview. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 1998, 36, 1072–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diner, J.; Beckert, C.; Bothwell, W.; Rodriguez, I. Performance of the MISR instrument during its first 20 months in earth orbit. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2002, 40, 1449–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hioki, S.; Funatomi, T.; Nakata, M.; Mukai, S.; Kidode, M. Stereoscopic height estimation of biomass burning aerosol and volcanic ash plumes by the second-generation global imager (SGLI). Remote Sens. 2024, 13193, 72–79. [Google Scholar]
- Kajino, M.; Deushi, M.; Sekiyama, T.T.; Oshima, N.; Yumimoto, K.; Tanaka, T.Y.; Ching, J.; Hashimoto, A.; Yamamoto, T.; Ikegami, M.; et al. Comparison of three aerosol representations of NHM-Chem (v1.0) for the simulations of air quality and climate-relevant variables. Geosci. Model Dev. 2021, 14, 2235–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakata, M.; Kajino, M.; Sato, Y. Effects of mountains on aerosols determined by AERONET/DRAGON/J-ALPS measurements and regional model simulations. Earth Space Sci. 2021, 8, e2021EA001972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nishizawa, S.; Yashiro, H.; Sato, Y.; Miyamoto, Y.; Tomita, H. Influence of grid aspect ratio on planetary boundary layer turbulence in large-eddy simulations. Geosci. Model Dev. 2015, 8, 3393–3491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sato, Y.; Nishizawa, S.; Yashiro, H.; Miyamoto, Y.; Kajikawa, Y.; Tomita, H. Impacts of cloud microphysics on trade wind cumulus: Which cloud microphysics processes contribute to the diversity in a large eddy simulation. Prog. Earth Planet. Sci. 2015, 2, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giovannini, L.; Laiti, L.; Serafin, S.; Zardi, D. The thermally driven diurnal wind system of the Adige Valley in the Italian Alps. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 2017, 143, 2389–2402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmidli, J.; Böing, S.; Fuhrer, O. Accuracy of simulated diurnal valley winds in the Swiss Alps: Influence of grid resolution. Atmosphere 2018, 9, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Xu, X.; Qiao, L.; Gong, D.; Kim, S.; Wang, Y.; Mao, R. Numerical simulations of the effects of regional topography on haze pollution in Beijing. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eck, T.; Holben, B.; Reid, J.; Giles, D.; Rivas, M.; Singh, R.; Tripathi, S.; Bruegge, C.; Platnick, S.; Arnold, G.; et al. Fog- and cloud-induced aerosol modification observed by the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET). J. Geophys. Res. 2012, 117, D07206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukai, S.; Nakata, M.; Sano, I.; Fujito, T. Derivation of BBA Plume Properties by Taking Advantage of the Characteristics of GCOM-C/SGLI. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2024, 17, 9790–9796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, L.; Martin, M.V.; Gatti, L.V.; Kahn, R.; Hecobian, A.; Fischer, E.V. Development and implementation of a new biomass burning emissions injection height scheme (BBEIH v1.0) for the GEOS-Chem model (v9-01-01). Geosci. Model Dev. 2018, 11, 4103–4116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakata, M.; Mukai, S. Consideration of aerosol injection processes originating from wildfires in a chemical transport model. Remote Sens. 2024, 13193, 141–144. [Google Scholar]
- Mukai, S.; Hioki, S.; Nakata, M. Biomass burning plume from simultaneous observations of polarization and radiance at different viewing directions. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 5405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Imaoka, K.; Kachi, M.; Fujii, H.; Murakami, H.; Hori, M.; Ono, A.; Igarashi, T.; Nakagawa, K.; Oki, T.; Honda, Y.; et al. Global change observation mission (GCOM) for monitoring carbon, water cycles, and climate change. Proc. IEEE 2010, 98, 717–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tores, O.; Bhartia, P.K.; Herman, J.R.; Ahmad, Z.; Gleason, J. Derivation of aerosol properties from satellite measurements of backscattered ultraviolet radiation: Theoretical basis. J. Geophys. Res. 1998, 103, 17099–17110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukai, S.; Sano, I.; Nakata, M. Algorithms for the classification and characterization of aerosols: Utility verification of near-UV satellite observations. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 2019, 13, 01452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, Z.; Ueda, H.; Matsuda, K.; Zhang, R.; Arao, K.; Kanai, Y.; Hasome, H. Model study on particle size segregation and deposition during Asian dust events in March 2002. J. Geophys. Res. 2004, 109, D19205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clarke, A.D.; Owens, S.R.; Zhou, J. An ultrafine sea-salt flux from breaking waves: Implications for cloud condensation nuclei in the remote marine atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 2006, 111, D06202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kajino, M.; Deushi, M.; Sekiyama, T.T.; Oshima, N.; Yumimoto, K.; Tanaka, T.T.; Ching, J.; Hashimoto, A.; Yamamoto, T.; Ikegami, M.; et al. NHM-Chem, the Japan Meteorological Agency’s regional meteorology—Chemistry model: Model evaluations toward the consis tent predictions of the chemical, physical, and optical properties of aerosols. J. Meteor. Soc. Jpn. 2019, 97, 337–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaiser, W.; Heil, A.; Andreae, O.; Benedetti, A.; Chubarova, N.; Jones, L.; Morcrette, J.; Razinger, M.; Schultz, G.; Suttie, M.; et al. Biomass burning emissions estimated with a global fire assimilation system based on observed fire radiative power. Biogeosciences 2012, 9, 527–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakata, M.; Mukai, S. Aerosol distribution due to wildfire in Sumatra, Indonesia considered from model simulation. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colarco, P.; da Silva, A.; Chin, M.; Diehl, T. Online simulations of global aerosol distributions in the NASA GEOS-4 model and comparisons to satellite and ground-based aerosol optical depth. J. Geophys. Res. 2010, 115, D14207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bourgeois, Q.; Ekman, A.M.L.; Krejci, R. Aerosol transport over the Andes from the Amazon Basin to the remote Pacific Ocean: A multiyear CALIOP assessment. J. Geophys. Res. 2015, 120, 8411–8425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dietrich, W.E. Setting velocity of natural particles. Water Resour. Res. 1982, 18, 1615–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clarke, A.D.; Collins, W.G.; Rasche, P.J.; Kapustin, V.N.; Moore, K.; Howell, S.; Fuelberg, H.E. Dust and pollution transport on global scales: Aerosol measurements and model predictions. J. Geophys. Res. 2001, 106, 32555–32569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murphy, D.M.; Cziczo, D.J.; Froyd, K.D.; Hudson, P.K.; Matthew, B.M.; Middlebrook, A.M.; Peltier, R.E.; Sullivan, A.; Thomson, D.S.; Weber, R.J. Single-particle mass spectrometry of tropospheric aerosol particles. J. Geophys. Res. 2006, 111, D23S32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wulandari, E.; Mardianto, D.; Susilastuti, D.H.; Maryudi, A. Scholarly interest in forest fires in Indonesia: A bibliographical review. For. Soc 2022, 6, 609–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van de Hulst, H.C. A New Look at Multiple Scattering; NASA Institute for Space Studies: New York, NY, USA, 1963; 162p. [Google Scholar]
- Mukai, S.; Sano, I.; Takashima, T. Investigation of atmospheric aerosols based on polarization measurements and scattering simulations. Opt. Rev. 1996, 3, 487–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Omar, A.; Won, J.; Winker, D.; Yoon, S.; Dubovik, O.; McCormick, P. Development of global aerosol models using cluster analysis of aerosol robotic network (AERONET) measurements. J. Geophys. Res. 2005, 110, D10S14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oleg, D.; Sayer, A.; Hsu, N.; Eck, T.; Smirnov, A.; Holben, B. AERONET-based models of smoke-dominated aerosol near source regions and transported over ocean, and implications for satellite retrievals of aerosol optical depth. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014, 14, 11493–11523. [Google Scholar]












| Channel | Center Wavelength (nm) | Band Width (nm) | Spatial Resolution (m) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-polarization Channel | 1 | 380 | 10 | 250 *1 |
| 2 | 412 | 10 | ||
| 3 | 443 | 10 | ||
| 4 | 490 | 10 | ||
| 5 | 530 | 20 | ||
| 6 | 565 | 20 | ||
| 7 | 673.5 | 20 | ||
| 8 | 673.5 | 20 | ||
| 9 | 763 | 12 | ||
| 10 | 868.5 | 20 | ||
| 11 | 868.5 | 20 | ||
| Polarization Channel | P1 | 673.5 | 20 | 1000 |
| P2 | 868.5 | 20 | ||
| SWI Channel | SW1 | 1050 | 20 | 1000 |
| SW2 | 1380 | 20 | ||
| SW3 | 1630 | 200 | 250 *1 | |
| SW4 | 2210 | 50 | 1000 | |
| TIR Channel | T1 | 10.8 *2 | 0.74 *2 | 250 *3 |
| T2 | 12.0 *2 | 0.74 *2 |
| Top Height (h m) | AOT (500) | AE |
|---|---|---|
| 6500 | 5.78 | 2.10 |
| 6000 | 5.69 | 2.04 |
| 5000 | 5.32 | 1.77 |
| 3000 | 4.41 | 1.74 |
| Top Height (h m) | AOT (500) | AE |
|---|---|---|
| 3000 | ||
| 2000 | 5.22 | 1.76 |
| 1000 | 5.06 | 1.64 |
| 0 | 4.92 | 1.46 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Nakata, M.; Mukai, S.; Hioki, S. Particle Size Characteristics at the Top of Biomass Burning Plumes Based on Two Case Studies. Remote Sens. 2026, 18, 747. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18050747
Nakata M, Mukai S, Hioki S. Particle Size Characteristics at the Top of Biomass Burning Plumes Based on Two Case Studies. Remote Sensing. 2026; 18(5):747. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18050747
Chicago/Turabian StyleNakata, Makiko, Sonoyo Mukai, and Souichiro Hioki. 2026. "Particle Size Characteristics at the Top of Biomass Burning Plumes Based on Two Case Studies" Remote Sensing 18, no. 5: 747. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18050747
APA StyleNakata, M., Mukai, S., & Hioki, S. (2026). Particle Size Characteristics at the Top of Biomass Burning Plumes Based on Two Case Studies. Remote Sensing, 18(5), 747. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18050747

