Next Article in Journal
Long-Term Assessment of Post-Mining Spectral Recovery Patterns: Integrating Disturbance Timing, Land-Surface Transitions, and Benchmark-Relative Spectral Closure
Previous Article in Journal
From Optical Design to NIIRS and Object Detection: An Integrated Framework for Spatial Image Quality Assessment of Micro-Satellite Constellations
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Remote Sensing
Volume 18
Issue 12
10.3390/rs18121944
remotesensing-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

The Impact of Different Sampling Rates of On-Board Cold Atom Interferometry Gradiometer on the Gravity Field Solution Accuracy

by
Benben Niu
,
Qinglu Mu
*,
Zhi Yin
,
Jigang Wang
,
Zerui Cheng
and
Yutong Wang
School of Marine Technology and Geomatics, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222005, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2026, 18(12), 1944; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18121944
Submission received: 29 April 2026 / Revised: 7 June 2026 / Accepted: 9 June 2026 / Published: 11 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Satellite Missions for Earth and Planetary Exploration)
Versions Notes

Abstract

The development of cold atom interferometry (CAI) provides new opportunities for next-generation satellite gravity gradiometry missions. Compared with the electrostatic gradiometer onboard the GOCE satellite, CAI gradiometers exhibit white noise characteristics within the effective measurement bandwidth, enabling improved performance in the low-frequency range (<5
Keywords: cold atom interferometry gradiometer; gravity field recovery; GOCE; sampling rates cold atom interferometry gradiometer; gravity field recovery; GOCE; sampling rates

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Niu, B.; Mu, Q.; Yin, Z.; Wang, J.; Cheng, Z.; Wang, Y. The Impact of Different Sampling Rates of On-Board Cold Atom Interferometry Gradiometer on the Gravity Field Solution Accuracy. Remote Sens. 2026, 18, 1944. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18121944

AMA Style

Niu B, Mu Q, Yin Z, Wang J, Cheng Z, Wang Y. The Impact of Different Sampling Rates of On-Board Cold Atom Interferometry Gradiometer on the Gravity Field Solution Accuracy. Remote Sensing. 2026; 18(12):1944. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18121944

Chicago/Turabian Style

Niu, Benben, Qinglu Mu, Zhi Yin, Jigang Wang, Zerui Cheng, and Yutong Wang. 2026. "The Impact of Different Sampling Rates of On-Board Cold Atom Interferometry Gradiometer on the Gravity Field Solution Accuracy" Remote Sensing 18, no. 12: 1944. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18121944

APA Style

Niu, B., Mu, Q., Yin, Z., Wang, J., Cheng, Z., & Wang, Y. (2026). The Impact of Different Sampling Rates of On-Board Cold Atom Interferometry Gradiometer on the Gravity Field Solution Accuracy. Remote Sensing, 18(12), 1944. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18121944

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop