This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Quantifying the Drivers of the Spatial Distribution of Urban Surfaces in Bangladesh: A Multi-Method Geospatial Analysis
by
Kazi Jihadur Rashid
Kazi Jihadur Rashid 1,
Rajsree Das Tuli
Rajsree Das Tuli 2,
Weibo Liu
Weibo Liu 3
and
Victor Mesev
Victor Mesev 1,*
1
Department of Geography, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA
2
Department of Geography and Environmental Sustainability, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA
3
Department of Geosciences, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(12), 2050; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17122050 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 12 April 2025
/
Revised: 4 June 2025
/
Accepted: 11 June 2025
/
Published: 13 June 2025
Abstract
Urban expansion threatens sustainable development in densely populated countries like Bangladesh. This study aims to quantitatively identify and evaluate the key drivers influencing the spatial distribution of urban surfaces (SDUS) in Chattogram City, providing insights into urban growth patterns over 30 years. Using Landsat 5 and 9 imageries, the Normalized Difference Built-up Index (NDBI) was computed for 1993 and 2023 to map urban surface changes. A total of 16 geospatial variables representing potential drivers were analyzed. Four statistical and machine learning methods, including GeoDetector, Distributed Random Forest (DRF), global Geographically Weighted Random Forest (GWRF), and local GWRF, were employed to quantify individual and interactive influences on SDUS. The Geodetector analysis identified the central business district (CBD) as the most influential driver of urban surface distribution, with a q statistic of 0.22, followed by river proximity (q = 0.14) and administrative boundaries (q = 0.13). Across all models, CBD consistently ranked as a dominant factor. In the Distributed Random Forest (DRF) model, CBD showed the highest importance score (0.57), followed by coastlines (0.35) and rivers (0.35). The DRF model achieved the highest performance (R2 = 0.612), outperforming the global GWRF (R2 = 0.59) and local GWRF (R2 = 0.529). Although variables like the proximity of administrative location and forests have low individual impacts, they show a stronger coupled influence. This industrial port-based economy expanded, facing challenges of uncontrolled urbanization, poor governance, and environmental issues. Promoting mixed land use planning, decentralizing urban governance, and improving coordination among implementing agencies may better resolve these issues. This work may help planners and policymakers in planning future cities and developing policies to promote sustainable urban growth.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Rashid, K.J.; Tuli, R.D.; Liu, W.; Mesev, V.
Quantifying the Drivers of the Spatial Distribution of Urban Surfaces in Bangladesh: A Multi-Method Geospatial Analysis. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 2050.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17122050
AMA Style
Rashid KJ, Tuli RD, Liu W, Mesev V.
Quantifying the Drivers of the Spatial Distribution of Urban Surfaces in Bangladesh: A Multi-Method Geospatial Analysis. Remote Sensing. 2025; 17(12):2050.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17122050
Chicago/Turabian Style
Rashid, Kazi Jihadur, Rajsree Das Tuli, Weibo Liu, and Victor Mesev.
2025. "Quantifying the Drivers of the Spatial Distribution of Urban Surfaces in Bangladesh: A Multi-Method Geospatial Analysis" Remote Sensing 17, no. 12: 2050.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17122050
APA Style
Rashid, K. J., Tuli, R. D., Liu, W., & Mesev, V.
(2025). Quantifying the Drivers of the Spatial Distribution of Urban Surfaces in Bangladesh: A Multi-Method Geospatial Analysis. Remote Sensing, 17(12), 2050.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17122050
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.