Next Article in Journal
Radar Reflectivity Assimilation Based on Hydrometeor Control Variables and Its Impact on Short-Term Precipitation Forecasting
Previous Article in Journal
Detecting the Effects of Extreme Events on Estuarine Suspended Particulate Matter Using Satellite Remote Sensing (Scheldt Estuary): Challenges and Opportunities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Passive Joint Emitter Localization with Sensor Self-Calibration

1
Department of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
2
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(3), 671; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030671
Submission received: 25 November 2022 / Revised: 9 January 2023 / Accepted: 19 January 2023 / Published: 23 January 2023

Abstract

This paper studies the problem surrounding distributed passive arrays (sensors) locating multiple emitters while performing self-calibration to correct possible errors in the assumed array directions. In our setting, only the angle-of-arrival (AoA) information is available for localization. However, such information may contain bias due to array directional errors. Hence, localization requires self-calibration. To achieve both, the key element behind our approach is that the received signals from the same emitter should be geometrically consistent if sensor arrays are successfully calibrated. This leads to our signal model, which is built on a mapping directly from emitter locations and array directional errors to received signals. Then we formulate an atomic norm minimization and use group sparsity to promote geometric consistency and align ‘ghost’ emitter locations from calibration errors. Simulations verify the effectiveness of the proposed scheme. We derive the Cramér Rao lower bound and numerically compare it to the simulations. Furthermore, we derive a necessary condition as a rule of thumb to decide the feasibility of joint localization and calibration.
Keywords: passive joint emitter localization; direct localization; array directional error; self-calibration; group sparsity passive joint emitter localization; direct localization; array directional error; self-calibration; group sparsity

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, G.; Liu, H.; Dai, W.; Huang, T.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X. Passive Joint Emitter Localization with Sensor Self-Calibration. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 671. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030671

AMA Style

Zhang G, Liu H, Dai W, Huang T, Liu Y, Wang X. Passive Joint Emitter Localization with Sensor Self-Calibration. Remote Sensing. 2023; 15(3):671. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030671

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Guangbin, Hengyan Liu, Wei Dai, Tianyao Huang, Yimin Liu, and Xiqin Wang. 2023. "Passive Joint Emitter Localization with Sensor Self-Calibration" Remote Sensing 15, no. 3: 671. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030671

APA Style

Zhang, G., Liu, H., Dai, W., Huang, T., Liu, Y., & Wang, X. (2023). Passive Joint Emitter Localization with Sensor Self-Calibration. Remote Sensing, 15(3), 671. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030671

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop