Next Article in Journal
A Novel Method of Ship Detection under Cloud Interference for Optical Remote Sensing Images
Next Article in Special Issue
Spatial-Statistical Analysis of Landscape-Level Wildfire Rate of Spread
Previous Article in Journal
Application of a PLS-Augmented ANN Model for Retrieving Chlorophyll-a from Hyperspectral Data in Case 2 Waters of the Western Basin of Lake Erie
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evolution Analysis of Ecological Networks Based on Spatial Distribution Data of Land Use Types Monitored by Remote Sensing in Wuhan Urban Agglomeration, China, from 2000 to 2020
 
 
Technical Note
Peer-Review Record

LiDAR Reveals the Process of Vision-Mediated Predator–Prey Relationships

Remote Sens. 2022, 14(15), 3730; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14153730
by Yanwen Fu 1,†, Guangcai Xu 2,†, Shang Gao 2, Limin Feng 1, Qinghua Guo 3 and Haitao Yang 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(15), 3730; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14153730
Submission received: 21 June 2022 / Revised: 19 July 2022 / Accepted: 22 July 2022 / Published: 4 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Landscape Ecology in Remote Sensing)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The title and "boilerplate" sections reach for a level of paradigm that is not supported by content and will likely be misleading for prospective readers.  The content involves ground-based lidar of which there is no indication in the title -- or even that lidar is involved.  The mode of interaction between species and modeling thereof is quite specific to the tiger-boar couplet, not carrying the general applicability that is implied as well as explicitly suggested.  There is considerable question whether remote sensing is the best umbrella versus modeling of particular predator-prey processes.  "Providing an operable framework for exploring the mechanisms of biodiversity maintenance" is a substantial overreach.   Modeling a particular predator-prey interaction involving a specific stalking behavior is what was done and described. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Generally interesting subject. However the preparation of manuscript is poor. The graphical research workflow was presented only in the discussion. In results there are general information are presented, which do not come from the conducted research.

In principle, the analysis is devoted to the behavior of the boar (and its nest preparation), not the tiger preparation, although a simplified simulation of an ambush is used.

I have some doubts about about statistical analysis.

Please see attached file for details.

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

After the modifications, the manuscript is easier to understand.

My only concerns are raised by the position of the tiger in ambush behaviour i.e. that the authors only considered the lateral position of the hunting tiger. I hope that authors in future research will consider the face position of the approaching attacker.

Back to TopTop