Next Article in Journal
Accuracy, Efficiency, and Transferability of a Deep Learning Model for Mapping Retrogressive Thaw Slumps across the Canadian Arctic
Next Article in Special Issue
Forest Fire Segmentation from Aerial Imagery Data Using an Improved Instance Segmentation Model
Previous Article in Journal
Use of the Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 Satellites for Water Quality Monitoring: An Early Warning Tool in the Mar Menor Coastal Lagoon
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Model for Expressing Industrial Information Based on Object-Oriented Industrial Heat Sources Detected Using Multi-Source Thermal Anomaly Data in China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Marchese et al. Mt. Etna Paroxysms of February–April 2021 Monitored and Quantified through a Multi-Platform Satellite Observing System. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3074

1
National Research Council, Institute of Methodologies for Environmental Analysis, 85050 Potenza, Italy
2
School of Engineering, University of Basilicata, 85100 Potenza, Italy
3
Osservatorio Etneo, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Piazza Roma, 2 95125 Catania, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(12), 2746; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122746
Submission received: 19 October 2021 / Accepted: 6 May 2022 / Published: 8 June 2022
In the original article [1], there were some mistakes in Figure 4 and Figure 8, and Sections ‘Abstract’, ‘Discussion’, and ‘Conclusions’. The correct contents appears below. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original article has been updated.

1. Error in Figures

In Figure 4, the label ‘1st’ erroneously referred to 18 February 2021. The correct Figure 4 appears below.
Figure 4. Temporal trend of the total hotspot area (m2) retrieved using NHI tool, by integrating L8-OLI and S2-MSI observations over the period 1 February−4 April 2021, with the indication of the relative paroxysm.
Figure 4. Temporal trend of the total hotspot area (m2) retrieved using NHI tool, by integrating L8-OLI and S2-MSI observations over the period 1 February−4 April 2021, with the indication of the relative paroxysm.
Remotesensing 14 02746 g001
In Figure 8 as published. Three labels of the plot were wrong. The correct Figure 8 appears below.
Figure 8. Plot of hotspot area generated through the NHI tool, integrating L8-OLI (from April 2013 onwards) and S2-MSI observations (from June 2015 onwards).
Figure 8. Plot of hotspot area generated through the NHI tool, integrating L8-OLI (from April 2013 onwards) and S2-MSI observations (from June 2015 onwards).
Remotesensing 14 02746 g002

2. Text Correction

2.1. Correction in Section ‘Abstract’

In the original article, estimates of volcanic radiative power (VRP) up to 14 GW did not refer to the Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager (SEVIRI) data. And the largest thermal anomaly affecting Mt. Etna according to the Normalized Hotspot Indices (NHI) tool, on 18 and 28 February 2021, was not related to the 1st and 3rd paroxysm. A correction has been made to the Abstract:
“…Results retrieved from Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR), Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), starting from outputs of the Robust Satellite Techniques for Volcanoes (RSTVOLC), indicate that the 17th paroxysm (31 March–1 April) was the most intense in terms of radiative power, with values estimated around 14 GW…”
“…according to the Normalized Hotspot Indices (NHI) tool, the 2nd (17–18 February) and 7th (28 February) paroxysm generated the largest thermal anomaly at Mt. Etna after April 2013, when Landsat-8 OLI data became available…”

2.2. Correction in Section ‘Discussion’

The sentence reporting the 17th paroxysm as the most powerful is incorrect. A correction has been made to the Discussion, paragraph 6:
“…Therefore, by combining information from MODIS (Figure 5) and SEVIRI (Figure 9) data, we can assert that the 17th paroxysm was among the most significant events and probably radiated the largest amount of energy…”

2.3. Correction in Section ‘Conclusions’

The sentence reporting the 17th paroxysm as the most powerful is partially correct. And the largest thermal anomaly affecting Mt. Etna according to the Normalized Hotspot Indices (NHI) tool, on 18 and 28 February 2021, erroneously referred to the 1st and 3rd paroxysm. A correction has been made to the Conclusions, paragraph 2:
“…The latter indicates that the 17th paroxysm, leading to values of radiative power up to about 14 GW from MODIS data (e.g., we retrieved VRP values up to 4 GW during the paroxysms of May 2016 [17]), was probably the most energetic of the time series as indicated by SEVIRI…”
“…Additionally, based on the information retrieved from L8-OLI and S2-MSI data, the 2nd and 7th paroxysm generated the largest thermal anomaly at Mt. Etna after 26 October 2013…”

Reference

  1. Marchese, F.; Filizzola, C.; Lacava, T.; Falconieri, A.; Faruolo, M.; Genzano, N.; Mazzeo, G.; Pietrapertosa, C.; Pergola, N.; Tramutoli, V.; et al. Mt. Etna Paroxysms of February–April 2021 Monitored and Quantified through a Multi-Platform Satellite Observing System. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marchese, F.; Filizzola, C.; Lacava, T.; Falconieri, A.; Faruolo, M.; Genzano, N.; Mazzeo, G.; Pietrapertosa, C.; Pergola, N.; Tramutoli, V.; et al. Correction: Marchese et al. Mt. Etna Paroxysms of February–April 2021 Monitored and Quantified through a Multi-Platform Satellite Observing System. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3074. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 2746. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122746

AMA Style

Marchese F, Filizzola C, Lacava T, Falconieri A, Faruolo M, Genzano N, Mazzeo G, Pietrapertosa C, Pergola N, Tramutoli V, et al. Correction: Marchese et al. Mt. Etna Paroxysms of February–April 2021 Monitored and Quantified through a Multi-Platform Satellite Observing System. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3074. Remote Sensing. 2022; 14(12):2746. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122746

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marchese, Francesco, Carolina Filizzola, Teodosio Lacava, Alfredo Falconieri, Mariapia Faruolo, Nicola Genzano, Giuseppe Mazzeo, Carla Pietrapertosa, Nicola Pergola, Valerio Tramutoli, and et al. 2022. "Correction: Marchese et al. Mt. Etna Paroxysms of February–April 2021 Monitored and Quantified through a Multi-Platform Satellite Observing System. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3074" Remote Sensing 14, no. 12: 2746. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122746

APA Style

Marchese, F., Filizzola, C., Lacava, T., Falconieri, A., Faruolo, M., Genzano, N., Mazzeo, G., Pietrapertosa, C., Pergola, N., Tramutoli, V., & Neri, M. (2022). Correction: Marchese et al. Mt. Etna Paroxysms of February–April 2021 Monitored and Quantified through a Multi-Platform Satellite Observing System. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3074. Remote Sensing, 14(12), 2746. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122746

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop