Next Article in Journal
A Novel Technique for Modeling Ecosystem Health Condition: A Case Study in Saudi Arabia
Next Article in Special Issue
Mapping Tree Height in Burkina Faso Parklands with TanDEM-X
Previous Article in Journal
Change Detection in Urban Point Clouds: An Experimental Comparison with Simulated 3D Datasets
Previous Article in Special Issue
Determination of Structural Characteristics of Old-Growth Forest in Ukraine Using Spaceborne LiDAR
Article

A Comparison of Multi-Temporal RGB and Multispectral UAS Imagery for Tree Species Classification in Heterogeneous New Hampshire Forests

Department of Natural Resources & the Environment, University of New Hampshire, 56 College Rd, Durham, NH 03824, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(13), 2631; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13132631
Received: 4 June 2021 / Revised: 28 June 2021 / Accepted: 1 July 2021 / Published: 4 July 2021
Unmanned aerial systems (UASs) have recently become an affordable means to map forests at the species level, but research into the performance of different classification methodologies and sensors is necessary so users can make informed choices that maximize accuracy. This study investigated whether multi-temporal UAS data improved the classified accuracy of 14 species examined the optimal time-window for data collection, and compared the performance of a consumer-grade RGB sensor to that of a multispectral sensor. A time series of UAS data was collected from early spring to mid-summer and a sequence of mono-temporal and multi-temporal classifications were carried out. Kappa comparisons were conducted to ascertain whether the multi-temporal classifications significantly improved accuracy and whether there were significant differences between the RGB and multispectral classifications. The multi-temporal classification approach significantly improved accuracy; however, there was no significant benefit when more than three dates were used. Mid- to late spring imagery produced the highest accuracies, potentially due to high spectral heterogeneity between species and homogeneity within species during this time. The RGB sensor exhibited significantly higher accuracies, probably due to the blue band, which was found to be very important for classification accuracy and lacking in the multispectral sensor employed here. View Full-Text
Keywords: remote sensing; forests; New Hampshire; UAS; multi-temporal; species level; OBIA remote sensing; forests; New Hampshire; UAS; multi-temporal; species level; OBIA
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Grybas, H.; Congalton, R.G. A Comparison of Multi-Temporal RGB and Multispectral UAS Imagery for Tree Species Classification in Heterogeneous New Hampshire Forests. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 2631. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13132631

AMA Style

Grybas H, Congalton RG. A Comparison of Multi-Temporal RGB and Multispectral UAS Imagery for Tree Species Classification in Heterogeneous New Hampshire Forests. Remote Sensing. 2021; 13(13):2631. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13132631

Chicago/Turabian Style

Grybas, Heather, and Russell G. Congalton. 2021. "A Comparison of Multi-Temporal RGB and Multispectral UAS Imagery for Tree Species Classification in Heterogeneous New Hampshire Forests" Remote Sensing 13, no. 13: 2631. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13132631

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop