Next Article in Journal
Global and Regional High-Resolution VTEC Modelling Using a Two-Step B-Spline Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Models Based on Artificial Neural Networks Considering the Factor Selection Method and Various Non-Linear Activation Functions
Article

Priority Branches for Ship Detection in Optical Remote Sensing Images

Department of Micro/Nano Electronics, School of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(7), 1196; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071196
Received: 13 March 2020 / Revised: 3 April 2020 / Accepted: 4 April 2020 / Published: 8 April 2020
Much attention is being paid to using high-performance convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in the area of ship detection in optical remoting sensing (ORS) images. However, the problem of false negatives (FNs) caused by side-by-side ships cannot be solved, and the number of false positives (FPs) remains high. This paper uses a DLA-34 network with deformable convolution layers as the backbone. The network has two priority branches: a recall-priority branch for reducing the number of FNs, and a precision-priority branch for reducing the number of FPs. In our single-shot detection method, the recall-priority branch is based on an anchor-free module without non-maximum suppression (NMS), while the precision-priority branch utilizes an anchor-based module with NMS. We perform recall-priority branch functions based on the output part of the CenterNet object detector to precisely predict center points of bounding boxes. The Bidirectional Feature Pyramid Network (BiFPN), combined with the inference part of YOLOv3, is used to improve the precision of precision-priority branch. Finally, the boxes from two branches merge, and we propose priority-based selection (PBS) for choosing the accurate ones. Results show that our proposed method sharply improves the recall rate of side-by-side ships and significantly reduces the number of false alarms. Our method also achieves the best trade-off on our improved version of HRSC2016 dataset, with 95.57% AP at 56 frames per second on an Nvidia RTX-2080 Ti GPU. Compared with the HRSC2016 dataset, not only are our annotations more accurate, but our dataset also contains more images and samples. Our evaluation metrics also included tests on small ships and incomplete forms of ships. View Full-Text
Keywords: ship detection; optical remote sensing images; priority branch; side-by-side ships ship detection; optical remote sensing images; priority branch; side-by-side ships
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Sheng, W.; Jiang, J.; Jing, N.; Wang, Q.; Mao, Z. Priority Branches for Ship Detection in Optical Remote Sensing Images. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1196. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071196

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Sheng W, Jiang J, Jing N, Wang Q, Mao Z. Priority Branches for Ship Detection in Optical Remote Sensing Images. Remote Sensing. 2020; 12(7):1196. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071196

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yijia, Weiguang Sheng, Jianfei Jiang, Naifeng Jing, Qin Wang, and Zhigang Mao. 2020. "Priority Branches for Ship Detection in Optical Remote Sensing Images" Remote Sensing 12, no. 7: 1196. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071196

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop