Next Article in Journal
Electric Minibus Taxis in Cape Town: Energy Demand, Emissions, and Costs
Previous Article in Journal
Interference-Resilient Hydrogen Sensing for Sustainable Hydrogen Energy Systems: A Review of Material-, Algorithm-, and System-Level Strategies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Conceptualization of Artificial Intelligence Use for GHG Scope 3 Emissions Measurement, Reporting, Monitoring, and Assurance: A Critical Systems Perspective
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Making It Look Green: Big Data Analytics, External Pressure, and Corporate Greenwashing

1
School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
2
Renmin Business School, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Sustainability 2026, 18(4), 2121; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18042121
Submission received: 26 January 2026 / Revised: 9 February 2026 / Accepted: 16 February 2026 / Published: 21 February 2026

Abstract

Digital technologies are widely viewed as important tools for enhancing corporate environmental performance. However, there is growing recognition that their environmental impacts are not uniformly positive and may even generate unintended negative consequences. Drawing on institutional theory and impression management theory, we argue that big data analytics (BDA) provides firms with powerful capabilities to strategically manage environmental impressions in response to external pressures. Using panel data of Chinese listed firms from 2012 to 2023, we provide empirical evidence that BDA significantly promotes corporate greenwashing. Specifically, BDA facilitates greenwashing through the reinforcement of three core dimensions of impression management: self-serving bias, symbolic management, and accounting rhetoric. Moreover, by distinguishing between different types of external pressures, our results show that constraint-based non-market pressures weaken the relationship between BDA and greenwashing, whereas opportunity-based market pressures strengthen it. Our study enriches the digitalization and corporate environmental performance literature by revealing the dark side of digital technologies and offering a more nuanced understanding of how specific technologies shape corporate environmental misconduct.
Keywords: big data analytics; corporate greenwashing; environmental performance; institutional theory; impression management theory big data analytics; corporate greenwashing; environmental performance; institutional theory; impression management theory

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Su, H.; Li, S. Making It Look Green: Big Data Analytics, External Pressure, and Corporate Greenwashing. Sustainability 2026, 18, 2121. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18042121

AMA Style

Su H, Li S. Making It Look Green: Big Data Analytics, External Pressure, and Corporate Greenwashing. Sustainability. 2026; 18(4):2121. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18042121

Chicago/Turabian Style

Su, Huiwen, and Sitong Li. 2026. "Making It Look Green: Big Data Analytics, External Pressure, and Corporate Greenwashing" Sustainability 18, no. 4: 2121. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18042121

APA Style

Su, H., & Li, S. (2026). Making It Look Green: Big Data Analytics, External Pressure, and Corporate Greenwashing. Sustainability, 18(4), 2121. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18042121

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop