Next Article in Journal
Environmental Management Accounting and Environmental Performance: Mediation, Moderation, and Governance in Bangladesh’s Garment Industry
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainable Supply Chains: Bridging Theory and Practice Through Hybrid Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

A Systems Thinking Analysis of Institutional Frameworks Governing the Energy–Water Nexus for Productive Agricultural Activities in Rural Tanzania

1
Faculty of Architecture and Arts, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Building E, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
2
Institute of Human Settlement Studies, Ardhi University, Dar es Salaam P. O. Box 35176, Tanzania
3
Faculty of Engineering Technology, Functional Materials Engineering, Hasselt University, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
4
School of Architecture, Construction Economics and Management, Ardhi University, Dar es Salaam P. O. Box 35176, Tanzania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(11), 5736; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115736
Submission received: 17 April 2026 / Revised: 28 May 2026 / Accepted: 1 June 2026 / Published: 4 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Sustainability)

Abstract

Sustainable agricultural development in rural sub-Saharan Africa increasingly depends on coordinated governance of energy and water resources. Despite the growing deployment of solar photovoltaic water pumping systems (SPVWPS), little is known about how the institutional framework shapes SPVWPS effectiveness for productive agricultural use in rural Tanzania. Drawing on systems thinking concepts, specifically hierarchy, interaction, and interconnectedness, this study analyses the institutional frameworks governing energy and water provision for irrigation and livestock keeping across three rural Tanzanian communities. A mixed-methods design was employed, with qualitative inquiry as the primary mode; 65 household surveys, nine semi-structured interviews with community leaders, SPV developers, and local officials, and seven focus group discussions with farmers and livestock keepers were conducted across the three study areas. National energy and water policy documents, reports, and strategic plans were also reviewed to contextualise the institutional frameworks governing energy and water delivery in rural areas. Findings reveal limited coordination among stakeholders, particularly between NGOs, government agencies (REA, RUWASA, and NIRC), and local communities in the planning and implementation of SPVWP projects. Top-down delivery mechanisms marginalised community feedback, undermining local ownership and limiting the productive use potential of installed systems. This study proposes an integrated institutional framework that combines systems thinking with bottom-up and top-down approaches, explicitly embedding structured feedback mechanisms and aligning stakeholder roles across all governance levels. The framework was validated through interviews with experts in the rural energy and governance field, confirming its practical relevance and applicability to rural energy–water governance. The framework offers actionable guidance for policymakers and development practitioners seeking to strengthen institutional coordination in rural energy–water–agriculture governance, contributing to progress towards SDG 7 and SDG 2 across sub-Saharan Africa.
Keywords: SPVWP; institutional framework; community participation; productive use; systems thinking; bottom-up and top-down approaches SPVWP; institutional framework; community participation; productive use; systems thinking; bottom-up and top-down approaches

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gonda, O.; Kombe, W.; Deferme, W.; Phoya, S.; Verbeeck, G. A Systems Thinking Analysis of Institutional Frameworks Governing the Energy–Water Nexus for Productive Agricultural Activities in Rural Tanzania. Sustainability 2026, 18, 5736. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115736

AMA Style

Gonda O, Kombe W, Deferme W, Phoya S, Verbeeck G. A Systems Thinking Analysis of Institutional Frameworks Governing the Energy–Water Nexus for Productive Agricultural Activities in Rural Tanzania. Sustainability. 2026; 18(11):5736. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115736

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gonda, Oliva, Wilbard Kombe, Wim Deferme, Sarah Phoya, and Griet Verbeeck. 2026. "A Systems Thinking Analysis of Institutional Frameworks Governing the Energy–Water Nexus for Productive Agricultural Activities in Rural Tanzania" Sustainability 18, no. 11: 5736. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115736

APA Style

Gonda, O., Kombe, W., Deferme, W., Phoya, S., & Verbeeck, G. (2026). A Systems Thinking Analysis of Institutional Frameworks Governing the Energy–Water Nexus for Productive Agricultural Activities in Rural Tanzania. Sustainability, 18(11), 5736. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115736

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop