Next Article in Journal
Improvement Pathways for Irrigation Water Use Efficiency in Large and Medium-Sized Irrigation Districts Based on Analysis of Influencing Factors: A Machine Learning Case Study in Anhui, China
Previous Article in Journal
Firm Entry, Environmental Regulation, and Air Pollution: Evidence from China’s Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Integrating Experimental Pyrolysis and Machine Learning for Sustainable Biochar Yield Prediction from Lignocellulosic Waste

Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Firat University, 23119 Elazig, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(10), 5203; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105203
Submission received: 26 February 2026 / Revised: 3 April 2026 / Accepted: 19 May 2026 / Published: 21 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Sustainability)

Abstract

Biochar production from lignocellulosic waste represents a sustainable route for biomass valorization and carbon management within circular bioeconomy frameworks. In this study, biochar was produced from two abundant agricultural wastes in Türkiye—tea-brewing residues and almond husks—via controlled non-isothermal pyrolysis, and biochar yield was modeled using data-driven machine learning approaches. The effects of key process parameters, including carbonization temperature (37–850 °C covering drying/pre-pyrolysis and pyrolysis regions), residence time (1–150 min), and heating rate (10–60 °C min−1), were evaluated using regression-based, ensemble, and deep learning models. Model performance was evaluated using cross-validation on training and testing datasets. The results showed that linear models exhibited limited predictive capability (R2 < 0.95), while regularized and ensemble models improved performance (R2 ≈ 0.97–0.99). Among all approaches, Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) achieved the highest predictive performance (R2 ≈ 0.99, RMSE ≈ 0.06), indicating its superior ability to capture nonlinear relationships, particularly for limited datasets. Sensitivity and partial dependence analyses identified carbonization temperature as the dominant factor controlling biochar yield, with sharp declines observed above 600 °C. Optimal yields of 52–55% were obtained at 400–500 °C and residence times of 10–15 min, while lower heating rates enhanced yield stability. Overall, the results demonstrate that advanced machine learning models provide reliable tools for optimizing biochar production and supporting sustainable thermochemical conversion of lignocellulosic waste for energy and carbon-oriented sustainability applications.
Keywords: biochar yield prediction; lignocellulosic biomass; pyrolysis; machine learning; regression-based models; deep neural networks (DNNs) biochar yield prediction; lignocellulosic biomass; pyrolysis; machine learning; regression-based models; deep neural networks (DNNs)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aljomah, A.; Taşar, Ş. Integrating Experimental Pyrolysis and Machine Learning for Sustainable Biochar Yield Prediction from Lignocellulosic Waste. Sustainability 2026, 18, 5203. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105203

AMA Style

Aljomah A, Taşar Ş. Integrating Experimental Pyrolysis and Machine Learning for Sustainable Biochar Yield Prediction from Lignocellulosic Waste. Sustainability. 2026; 18(10):5203. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105203

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aljomah, Abdulkarim, and Şeyda Taşar. 2026. "Integrating Experimental Pyrolysis and Machine Learning for Sustainable Biochar Yield Prediction from Lignocellulosic Waste" Sustainability 18, no. 10: 5203. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105203

APA Style

Aljomah, A., & Taşar, Ş. (2026). Integrating Experimental Pyrolysis and Machine Learning for Sustainable Biochar Yield Prediction from Lignocellulosic Waste. Sustainability, 18(10), 5203. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105203

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop