Implicit Circularity in the City: How Makerspaces Enable Everyday Repair, Reuse, and Learning

Makerspaces can serve as distributed urban infrastructures for repair, reuse, tool sharing, and peer learning, yet their contributions to circular economy (CE) goals often occur without being explicitly recognized or framed as CE practices. Inspired by practice theory and the literature on quiet sustainability, this study introduces implicit circularity as circular practices enacted without an explicit sustainability/CE framing by participants, and examines how such practices shape bottom-up circular transitions. Using reflexive thematic analysis informed by constructivist grounded theory procedures, we examined three linked questions: which circular practices occur in makerspaces and how they cluster into domains, how these practices vary across makerspace types, and which barriers and governance arrangements shape makerspaces’ consolidation as circular urban infrastructure. A qualitative multi-method design was employed in Czechia, combining field mapping with in-depth qualitative inquiry. Data included 40 semi-structured interviews with makerspace founders and operators, documentary analysis based on websites, social media, event listings, rules, and other documents, and 21 observations. Using reflexive thematic analysis informed by constructivist grounded theory procedures, we analyzed how circular practices cluster into domains, how implicit versus explicit circularity varies across makerspace types, which barriers constrain makerspaces’ consolidation as circular urban infrastructure, and what governance arrangements could mitigate them. Circularity was dominated by implicit, routine practices rather than formal, CE-branded programs. Three practice domains were identified: repair and maintenance, material flows, and learning/education. Explicit programming was comparatively less common and context-dependent. Barriers formed a reinforcing system spanning institutional fragmentation and coordination deficits, capability gaps, infrastructural constraints, and tensions around autonomy and legitimacy, which together kept many circular contributions low-visibility. Makerspaces constitute an under-recognized form of circular micro-infrastructure that couples technical capacity with social learning and can translate CE ambitions into everyday practice. To mobilize these latent capacities, cities need hybrid governance, especially light-touch coordination platforms, long-horizon operational support, and integration of makerspaces into municipal material-flow systems and repair/reuse strategies. The study offers a practice-based framework and a cross-case typology to support comparative research and grounded urban CE policy design.