Next Article in Journal
A Web-Based Learning Model for Smart Campuses: A Case in Landscape Architecture Education
Previous Article in Journal
AI Transparency and Sustainable Travel Under Climate Risk: A Geographical Perspective on Trust, Spatial Decision-Making, and Rural Destination Resilience
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

A Systematic Review on the Intersection of the Cold Chain and Digital Transformation

by
Nadin Alherimi
* and
Mohamed Ben-Daya
Department of Industrial Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah 26666, United Arab Emirates
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(24), 11202; https://doi.org/10.3390/su172411202
Submission received: 31 October 2025 / Revised: 29 November 2025 / Accepted: 12 December 2025 / Published: 14 December 2025

Abstract

Digital transformation (DT) is reshaping cold chain operations through technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain, and digital twins. However, evidence remains fragmented, and a systematic synthesis focused on how these technologies affect cold chain performance, sustainability, and cost-efficiency is limited. This PRISMA-based systematic literature review analyzes 107 studies published between 2009 and 2025 to examine enabling technologies and application areas, operational and sustainability impacts, and the main adoption challenges. The reviewed evidence suggests that digitalization can improve real-time visibility, temperature control, traceability, and energy management, supporting waste reduction and improved quality assurance. Key challenges include high implementation costs and uncertain returns on investment, interoperability constraints, data governance and cybersecurity concerns, and organizational readiness gaps. The paper concludes with implications for managers and policymakers and a future research agenda emphasizing integrated multi-technology solutions, standardized sustainability assessment, and rigorous validation through pilots, testbeds, and real-world deployments to enable scalable and resilient cold chain digitalization.

1. Introduction

The supply chain connects manufacturers, suppliers, and consumers and must cope with fluctuating demand, disruptions, and resource constraints [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Within the broader scope of supply chain operations, the cold chain emerges as a specialized and indispensable segment which is dedicated to preserving the quality and safety of perishable goods [7]. Critical stages encompass storage, transportation, and last-mile delivery, all requiring stringent temperature control. However, the cold chain is characterized by significant energy demands, with energy-intensive cooling and transportation processes contributing substantially to both operational expenses and environmental concerns [8].
The arrival of Industry 4.0 is forcing enterprises to adopt digital transformation (DT) strategies and rethink traditional operations [9]. DT, the integration of digital technologies into all areas of business, offers opportunities to enhance efficiency, agility, and sustainability [10]. The cold chain is at the forefront of this shift, leveraging technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), Artificial Intelligence (AI), blockchain, and digital twins [11,12,13]. These transformations promise enhanced visibility, streamlined operations, improved quality control, and the development of resilient cold chain networks.
Existing studies show growing interest in applying digital technologies to cold chain systems, highlighting their potential to address contemporary operational demands and sustainability requirements. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic literature review on the intersection of DT and the cold chain, focusing on research developed from 2009 to 2025. This review aims to uncover insights guided by the following research questions:
  • RQ1. How is DT impacting the cold chain industry?
  • RQ2. How can digital twins enhance cold chain operations, and what are the key implementation considerations?
  • RQ3. How does DT affect cold chain sustainability?
  • RQ4. What are the key benefits and challenges of integrating digital technologies in cold chain operations?
  • RQ5. What are the future trends and opportunities for digitalization in the cold chain?
Despite this growing body of work, there is still no comprehensive systematic review focused specifically on DT in cold chains. Managers also lack evidence-based guidance on how to adopt and operate these technologies, what returns to expect, and how to align digitalization with sustainability and cost-efficiency goals [14]. This review addresses these gaps by synthesizing recent studies on digital technologies, applications, benefits, and challenges in cold chains and by translating the findings into implications for managers and policymakers.
The subsequent sections of this paper are structured as follows: Section 2 outlines the research methodology and presents initial data statistics. Section 3 provides an in-depth discussion of the results derived from the literature review. Section 4 focuses on the research gaps found in the existing literature and offers recommendations for future studies. Finally, Section 5 presents the conclusion of this study and summarizes the key findings pertaining to the role of DT within the cold chain.

2. Materials and Methods

This section outlines the methodology used for the systematic literature review on DT in cold chains (2009–2025). It describes the search strategy, screening and eligibility criteria, and the approach to data extraction and synthesis, including analyses of publishing trends, key sources, and citation impact.

2.1. PRISMA Framework

This study adopts a systematic literature review of DT in cold chain management, focusing on enabling technologies, key challenges, and sustainability implications. The review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework [15], ensuring a transparent and rigorous process for identifying, screening, and analyzing relevant studies. The methodological approach is informed by prior systematic reviews of Zhang and Mohammad [16] and Rolf et al. [17] and uses a broad inclusion strategy to capture both qualitative and quantitative studies on digital technologies, applications, benefits, and challenges across cold chain stages. A broad inclusion strategy was applied to capture both qualitative and quantitative evidence relevant to DT applications, benefits, and challenges across cold-chain stages.
The literature search was conducted in Scopus (2009–2025) due to its broad multidisciplinary coverage of peer-reviewed literature. Scopus served as the primary database due to its comprehensive and widely recognized multidisciplinary coverage of peer-reviewed literature across science, technology, engineering, social sciences, and management disciplines [18]. Compared to other databases, it offers broader journal coverage and includes nearly all journals indexed in Web of Science, in addition to many more from emerging and regional sources, which enhances the inclusivity of literature from diverse research contexts. The search was limited to English-language documents to ensure consistency and facilitate analysis. As depicted in Figure 1, the systematic selection process encompassed four distinct phases including identification, screening, eligibility assessment, and inclusion. The initial search yielded 787 articles. Following the removal of duplicates and the application of predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 272 articles were assessed for eligibility. The final review included 91 articles that met the selection criteria, supplemented by extra articles leading to the inclusion of 107 articles included in the study. To further strengthen the robustness of the review, a quality assessment process was integrated with the PRISMA framework (see Supplementary Materials). It was a single reviewer who carried out all screening and quality appraisals to ensure methodological consistency and minimize bias by assessing design, data reporting, and relevance to the research objectives.
Although no formal, standardized risk-of-bias instrument was employed, all included studies were manually and critically appraised during screening and selection, with attention to methodological rigor, clarity of reporting, and alignment with the research objectives. To support transparency and comparability, key characteristics and findings from each article were extracted into structured evidence tables, which organized the literature by publication year, primary research focus, methodological approach, and main outcomes. Where appropriate, these tables were complemented by figures that consolidated thematic insights and enhanced the interpretability of the synthesis.
Because of the diverse designs, measures, and contexts represented in the included studies, statistical pooling and meta-analysis were not feasible. Consequently, the results were synthesized descriptively, focusing on abstracting and summarizing key data related to cold chain and DT and then aggregating emergent patterns, trends, and themes to provide a holistic understanding of the outcomes, consistent with the exploratory aims of this review. Formal evaluation of risk of bias from missing results and quantitative sensitivity analyses of pooled effects were not undertaken. Instead, potential reporting bias and heterogeneity were addressed by including a broad range of relevant studies, giving preference to those with clear methods and complete reporting, and qualitatively examining thematic differences, recurring patterns, and cross-study trends. This approach emphasizes the coherence and dependability of the evidence base, preserves the contextual nuance of individual studies, and transparently acknowledges the diversity of designs and methodologies.

2.2. Detailed Document Search Process

During the identification phase, the literature search in Scopus utilized the following designed keywords: (“cold chain” OR “cold supply chain” OR “cold chain logistic”) + “manag*” + (“enhanc*” OR “improv*” OR “optim*”) + (“logistic*” OR “digital” OR “technolog*” OR “digital transformation” OR “transport” OR “reefer” OR “fleet” OR “warehous*” OR “4.0” OR “5.0” OR “temperature” OR “energy consum*” OR “Sustainab*” OR “digital technolog*” OR “internet of things” OR “iot” OR “blockchain” OR “artificial intelligence” OR “ai” OR “machine learning” OR “big data” OR “cloud computing” OR “robot*” OR “automat*” OR “digital twin*” OR “big data” OR “smart” OR “intelligent” OR “augmented reality”). An additional search string, (“cold chain” OR “cold supply chain” OR “cold chain logistic”) + “Digital twin”, was used to identify extra papers. The review included related studies to ensure comprehensive analysis.
Preliminary scoping without time restrictions indicated that most research on digital technologies in cold chains has been published since 2009. The review therefore focused on the period 2009–2025 to capture the main developments associated with Industry 4.0 and the increasing use of IoT, AI, blockchain, and related technologies in cold chain logistics. Using this time window and the search strings described above, the initial search identified 787 English-language records.
During the screening phase, duplicate records identified through the keyword search were removed. Titles and abstracts were then reviewed to exclude studies unrelated to the main focus of this paper. Articles containing irrelevant keywords were also omitted, such as “female,” “male,” “immunization,” “immunization programs,” “adult,” “child,” and “animals” [19,20,21]. Consequently, the screening step resulted in reducing the number of articles to 272. In the subsequent eligibility phase, a more detailed review of the remaining papers was carried out by focusing on the methodologies described within the main text to ensure relevance. For example, some articles were excluded from this review as their primary focus diverged from the central theme of DT’s intersection with the cold chain. While each addresses important aspects of cold chain management, their emphasis lies instead on specific areas such as routing and supply chain optimization, network design and modelling, material and technology-specific applications, regional or industry-focused analyses, logistics and distribution planning, or sustainability-driven investigations, rather than on the overarching role and impact of DT within cold chain operations [22,23,24,25,26,27]. This meticulous approach led to the selection of 91 articles deemed suitable for inclusion in the review. A subsequent, updated search and citation tracking within Scopus identified 16 additional relevant studies that yielded a total of 107 articles included in the study. After the selection process, the retained articles were thoroughly analyzed to address the research questions outlined in this study.
The review adopted a broad search strategy to support a comprehensive and inclusive synthesis of literature. Rather than constraining eligibility to predefined variables, it sought to capture the full range of evidence at the intersection DT and cold chain. Flexible inclusion criteria across study designs, data types, and contexts enabled the incorporation of heterogeneous perspectives, ensuring wide representativeness and analytic depth.
All relevant information was available at the time of data extraction. The inclusion criteria were applied comprehensively and, because they did not impose narrow constraints on variables, no assumptions or imputations for missing data were required. This broad approach supported representativeness and ensured alignment with the study’s objectives.
Given the review’s descriptive orientation, no formal assessment of certainty in the evidence was undertaken. The synthesis emphasized identifying patterns and themes rather than quantitatively grading confidence in outcomes. Reliability was supported by prioritizing studies with rigorous methods and transparent reporting at selection, and by applying inclusion criteria calibrated to admit high-quality, relevant literature, thereby strengthening the credibility of the conclusions.

2.3. Chronological Growth of Publications

According to Figure 2, the analysis of publication trends from 2009 to 2025 reveals a notable evolution in research related to DT and the cold chain. The period from 2009 to 2019 exhibits a low level of activity, with annual publications generally remaining below five, suggesting an early stage of exploration in this interdisciplinary area. A shift occurs around 2020, marked by a gradual increase in publications, indicating growing recognition of DT’s relevance to the cold chain. This upward trend culminates in a peak in 2023, with approximately 40 publications, potentially driven by technological advancements and the need for more resilient cold chain solutions highlighted by global events. While the chart suggests a sharp decline in publications in 2024 and 2025, this should be interpreted cautiously. This apparent decline is likely due to a combination of factors, including potential data lags in indexing recent publications and, importantly, the fact that data collection for this review concluded in the first few days of January 2025, thus not capturing the full extent of 2025 publications. Nonetheless, it warrants further investigation into evolving research within this dynamic field.

2.4. Top Sources of Publication

The 107 papers investigated, along with the 94 journal and conference proceedings, were distributed across a range of sources. Figure 3 showcases the top 10 most frequent publication sources, accounting for 22 of the analyzed papers, thus representing approximately 21% of the total. Notably, Journal of Food Engineering and Scientific Reports each contributed 3 papers, highlighting their prominence in this field. Similarly, 2 papers each appeared in other top journals such as Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Journal of Industrial Information Integration, International Journal of Production Research (with two separate publications), Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Expert Systems with Applications, and Computers, Materials and Continua. The majority of these papers are published in leading journals within disciplines such as Food Science, General Science, Sustainability, Industrial Information Systems, Production Research, Electrical Engineering, Flexible Systems Management, Expert Systems, and Materials Science.

2.5. Citation Impact of the Reviewed Articles

The ten most cited works (Figure 4) reveal the key contributions shaping research at DT and cold chain intersection. The effect of a paper is determined by calculating how frequently it appears in the writings of other authors [28]. The work by Sunny et al. [29] lead with 361 citations, exploring blockchain-based traceability systems that enhance supply chain transparency through IoT integration and smart contracts. Following closely, Defraeye et al. [30] received 135 citations for developing biophysical twins and digital avatars that simulate temperature and biodegradation processes in food logistics. Other influential contributions include Martínez-Sala et al. [31], who pioneered the integration of Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) tags into packaging and transport units for enhanced tracking. Additionally, Onwude et al. [32] reviewed advanced digital tools such as imaging and IoT for reducing postharvest losses; and Ivanov [33] proposed the intelligent digital twin (iDT) as a framework for resilience analysis and disruption prediction. Additional notable works include Tsang et al. [34], Ivanov [35], Shoji et al. [14], Bhattacharyya et al. [36], and Wang et al. [37] further advanced cold chain monitoring through low-cost sensors, multi-gas detection, and digital twins for shelf-life management. Collectively, these studies represent the foundation of current research on the digitalization of cold chain systems, illustrating both the technological diversity and the rapid evolution of the field.

3. Discussion of Key Findings

This section synthesizes the main findings on how DT is reshaping cold chain operations. It first links key challenges to corresponding technological solutions (Table 1), then examines digital twin applications and their benefits (Table 2), and reviews sustainability initiatives enabled by digital tools (Figure 5). It concludes by summarizing the broader applications and benefits of these technologies (Table 3) and the technological, economic, organizational, and regulatory barriers that shape their adoption (Figure 6).

3.1. Overview of Cold Chain Issues and Technological Solution

Across cold chain stages, the literature consistently identifies temperature control and product quality as dominant operational concerns (Table 1). Temperature excursions and weak monitoring contribute to spoilage, economic loss, and, in health-related chains, potentially severe safety consequences. DT addresses these issues through real-time sensing, data-driven analytics, and automated or semi-automated control, which improve visibility and responsiveness across storage, transport, and last-mile activities.
A recurring theme is the move from periodic checks to continuous condition monitoring using RFID, IoT sensors, and data loggers. These tools create granular visibility into product state (i.e., temperature and humidity) and enable faster exception handling. Studies highlight the use of RFID for real-time temperature tracking and improved traceability [38], while IoT-based systems integrate sensing and data logging for end-to-end oversight of cold chain activities [39]. Data-management tools including artificial intelligence, big data analytics, and cloud computing convert these streams into actionable insight. AI models optimize temperature settings using live data [32], and big data techniques detect anomalies and forecast disruptions [40]. In parallel, automation technologies (i.e., smart reefers and digital twin simulations) support proactive operational adjustments and “test-before-deploy” process improvement, shifting the cold chain from reactive handling toward predictive management [30]. Together, these systems create an integrated network that reduces waste and enhances efficiency across the cold chain [41].
The review also shows that energy consumption is both a practical cost driver and a sustainability hotspot in cold chains due to refrigeration-intensive storage and transport. Studies describe energy reduction pathways enabled by digitalization, including tighter temperature control (i.e., avoiding overcooling), predictive routing and scheduling, and complementary interventions such as alternative energy integration and energy-efficient materials [42,43,44,45,46]. However, research attention is uneven, as many contributions concentrate on storage and transport, while certain last-mile contexts, including localized energy optimization and some high-stakes integrity scenarios, which are comparatively underexplored [47,48]. Therefore, future work should integrate efficiency, sustainability, and visibility into unified frameworks that balance performance with environmental responsibility [49].
Finally, the literature emphasizes that performance gains depend on end-to-end traceability and secure information flow. As networks become more connected, data integrity and cybersecurity concerns rise [50]. Blockchain applications offer secure, transparent recordkeeping that enhances trust among partners [51]. As cold chain networks become increasingly interconnected, collaboration and data sharing are vital for operational optimization and timely responses to disruptions [13,45]. These technical advances must be supported by organizational practices and regulatory frameworks that encourage transparency, accountability, and cooperative decision making across all stakeholders.
Table 1. Cold chain issue and technological solutions.
Table 1. Cold chain issue and technological solutions.
Cold Chain Issue/ProblemCold Chain StageConsequencesTechnological SolutionReference
Quality, safety, and temperature control and monitoringStorage, Warehousing, Transportation, Last-Mile Delivery, Outbound Logistics, Entire Cold Chain.Spoilage, quality degradation, vaccine inefficacy, food loss, economic and operational losses, emissions, public health and safety risks, illness outbreaks, product recalls, contamination, reduced efficiency, and environmental impact.3G, 5G, Acoustic Impulse Sensors, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Internet of Things (IoT), Artificial Neural Network, Anticipatory Shipping, Advanced Telematics Systems, Barcode, Battery-free Sensing, Big Data Analytics, Bluetooth Low Energy, Blockchain, Controlled Atmosphere Systems, Cloud Computing, Data Collection Systems, Data Loggers, Database Systems, Data Mining, Digital Twins, Distributed Ledger Technology, Electronic Data Interchange, Electronic Nose, General Packet Radio Service (GPRS), Grid Computing, Imaging Systems, Intelligent Packaging, Internet of Everything (IoE), Machine Learning (ML), Mobile Apps, Multi-Gas Sensors, Multi-Sensors, Near Field Communication Sensors, Optimization Algorithms, Printed Sensors, Real-Time Systems, Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID), Stacked Auto-Encoder,, Smart Reefers, Solar Harvesting, Time Temperature Integrators, Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN), ZigBee. [29,30,32,39,46,47,48,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90]
Efficiency and OperationalPost-harvest, Storage, Transportation, Entire Cold Chain.Product quality deterioration and spoilage, inventory obsolescence and waste, high energy use and associated environmental impact, increased operational costs and reduced profitability, customer dissatisfaction and reduced food security, safety incidents, and worker hazards, and data integrity, information-sharing, and cybersecurity and blockchain vulnerabilities.IoT, RFID, WSN, Neural Networks, GPS, Temperature Sensors, Phase Change Materials (PCMs), Predictive Algorithms, Internet of Vehicles, Sensors, Big Data Analytics, Genetic Algorithm, Digital Twins, AI, ML, Real-time Sensors, Edge Computing, Cloud, Blockchain,, IoE, BLE, Real-time Detection, T&H Monitoring, Mobile Apps, Motion Detection, Positioning.[34,45,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98]
Energy consumption and Environmental ImpactStorage, Transportation, Entire Cold Chain.High and inefficient energy use leading to higher costs and financial losses, increased emissions and pollution with associated quality damage, food loss and waste operational disruptions and unmet demand, data and cybersecurity risks, safety and worker hazards, and reduced investment, implementation difficulties, and loss of stakeholder trust.AI, IoT, Improved Fireworks–Artificial Bee Colony, Blockchain, Photovoltaic Panels, Kinetic Energy Recovery System, PCMs, Sensors, Ant Colony Algorithm, Cloud, Big Data Analytics, Digital Twin Service (DTS), IoE.[43,44,49,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106]
Lack of end-to-end visibility and traceabilityStorage, Transportation, Last-Mile Delivery, Entire Cold Chain.Energy inefficiency, resource waste, and inadequate infrastructure increase costs and cause economic losses, maintenance, capacity, and coordination problems create bottlenecks, and poor forecasting, limited traceability, weak data integration, and handling errors lead to spoilage, safety risks, and reduced transparency across the cold chain.ZigBee Technology, Sensor Technology, Integrated Development, ML, Real-Time Data, Intelligent Technology, Stochastic Process, WSN, AI, IoT, Big Data, RFID, GPRS, Kalman Filter, Cloud Computing, Digital Twins, Blockchain, Temperature Devices, Technological Infrastructure, Deep Neural Networks, Logistic Regression, IoE, Adaptive Data Smoothing and Compression, Smart Contracts, 5G, GIS, GPS, Stackelberg Models, Sensors.[13,30,40,41,45,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125]

3.2. Digital Twins in Cold Chain

Table 2 highlights the role of digital twin technology in the cold chain and reveals several trends and gaps requiring attention. Digital twins create virtual replicas of physical assets to optimize performance across operations and act as important enablers of DT [126]. While the table categorizes applications, benefits, and challenges, a deeper reading underscores their strategic implications and the complexity of real-world deployment.
The literature shows that digital twins have broad applicability across nearly all cold chain stages, from postharvest to storage, transportation, and retail. Their widespread use demonstrates an ability to deliver end to end visibility and process optimization, vital for preserving the integrity of perishable goods [32]. This capability directly addresses the limitations of traditional systems, where fragmented data and delayed feedback often restrict informed decision-making [64].
However, the applications of digital twins are not uniform across all stages. While quality control and traceability are emphasized across the entire cold chain, specific applications such as predictive maintenance tend to be more focused on certain stages (i.e., packaging, pre-cooling, transportation, storage, and postharvest) [32,45,46,89]. This suggests that the value proposition of digital twins varies depending on the specific operational needs and priorities of each stage.
The benefits of digital twins outlined in Table 2 extend beyond mere operational efficiency. Besides improving logistics and resource use, digital twins contribute to quality assurance, risk mitigation, and sustainability. Simulation and prediction of potential quality loss before implementation enable proactive interventions that reduce spoilage and waste [89]. This shift from reactive to preventive management yields measurable economic and environmental advantages.
Translating these benefits into practice remains challenging because implementation must overcome technical, organizational, and economic barriers. Key issues include model accuracy and validation, data integration and interoperability, and limited technical expertise, all of which constrain large-scale adoption [13,32,46,53,76,89,118,124]. Furthermore, high investment and resource demands underscore the need for clear ROI evaluation and phased strategic planning.
Consequently, a critical area for future research lies in addressing the ethical considerations associated with digital twin technology. While Table 2 acknowledges this challenge, the literature needs to further investigate the ethical implications of data use, privacy, and potential biases in model predictions. As digital twins become more integrated into decision-making processes, it is essential to ensure fairness, transparency, and accountability. In addition, existing studies offer valuable frameworks for understanding digital twin adoption, yet the field must progress beyond descriptive overviews. The literature therefore points to a need for robust implementation strategies, standardized validation protocols, and clearer frameworks for responsible deployment.
Table 2. Digital twin in cold chain.
Table 2. Digital twin in cold chain.
Digital Twin ApplicationReferencesCold Chain Stage Applicability of Digital Twin in Real-World (Future Application)Benefits of Applying Digital TwinChallenges of Applying Digital Twin
Quality Control and Traceability[30,32,46,64,76,88,89,90,98,117]Storage, transportation, and the entire cold chainReal-time monitored, quality-controlled logistics with food-quality prediction; optimized energy use; greater resilience and efficiency; less food waste; and improved cybersecurity and sustainability via IoT, AI, and blockchain integration.Digital twin applications enable simulation of operational impacts, real-time monitoring of environmental parameters, and integration of live data for informed decision-making. They help predict quality degradation, optimize refrigeration and logistics, enhance cybersecurity, and improve overall efficiency while reducing food and energy losses.Model accuracy, verification and validation processes, ethical considerations, integration challenges, data utilization, interoperability, standardization, cost and resource constraints, lack of technical expertise, simplification of models, generalizability of results, need for further research on rollout. Simplification of models, low generalizability, need for further research on rollout. Cost and resource constraints, interoperability, standardization, lack of technical expertise.
Real-time Monitoring and Optimization[12,30,32,33,45,46,53,64,72,76,88,89,98,117,118]Postharvest, storage, transportation, and retail.Improvement in operational efficiency, resilience, and sustainability in food supply chains. Improvement of product quality and economic profitability.Real-time monitoring and optimization of cold chain operations strengthen supply chain resilience, enable automatic control of refrigeration systems, and enhance product quality and economic performance.
Decision Support[12,30,33,35,46,53,64,76,88,89,118] Postharvest, logistics, storage, transportation, and retail.Enhancement in decision-making and performance across sectors, enhancement of growing practices, postharvest logistics, retail marketing, and cold chain strategies.Digital twins provide real-time insights and predictive analytics that enhance visibility, transparency, collaboration, and traceability, supporting informed decision-making and optimizing overall supply chain operations.
Risk Assessment and Mitigation[46,76,88,127]Storage and transportationImprovement in risk prediction and management, automation of processes, enhanced resilience, assessment of supplier risks, monitoring of compliance, development of contingency plans.Enhanced resilience through automation and real-time data acquisition, enabling faster decision-making, simplified process control, and early risk detection during disruptions.
Predictive Maintenance[32,45,46,89] Packaging, pre-cooling, transportation, storage, postharvest.Anticipation of maintenance needs, optimization of processes, improved efficiency.Real-time monitoring and data-driven insights enhance decision-making, improve efficiency, and enable continuous operational improvement.
Real-time Occupational Safety Monitoring[54]StorageHeightening of occupational safety monitoring, real-time safety tracking, incident handling improvement.Real-time monitoring with dynamic tracking maps integrates worker status and environmental conditions, enabling rapid response to anomalies.
ESG Evaluation[98]Storage and transportationEnhancement of ESG-driven transformation in energy enterprises by supporting long-term digital twin deployment through coordinated government incentives and private equity investments.Predictive analytics and real-time monitoring enhance decision-making, strengthen traceability in sustainable logistics, and improve data management and security.
Others[33,35]Entire cold chainEnhancement of decision-making, visualization, analysis, simulation, and optimization of supply chains.Enhanced management capabilities, real-time data-driven decision-making, descriptive, predictive, and prescriptive analytics, recognition of physical supply chain structure.

3.3. Sustainability Initiatives Through Digital Transformation in Cold Chain

Sustainability has become a central driver of DT research in cold chains, with three focus areas repeatedly emphasized: energy optimization, emission reduction, and waste minimization (Figure 5). This shift reflects a growing acknowledgment of the sector’s substantial ecological footprint and of the capacity of digital technologies to enable environmentally responsible operations.
The review indicates that energy consumption is the most frequently examined sustainability theme, cited in 36 studies. The dominance of this theme reveals the energy-intensive character of refrigeration, transport, and storage processes within the cold chain [42]. DT introduces tools that allow continuous monitoring and intelligent control, resulting in measurable energy savings. The inclusion of technologies such as IoT sensors, AI-based optimization algorithms, and digital twin models support real-time temperature regulation and adaptive energy use. For instance, dynamic temperature control allows precise adjustment of cooling levels according to product maturity and retailer demand, which prevents unnecessary energy expenditure [99]. Complementary research on renewable energy integration, particularly solar power and Phase Change Materials (PCMs), demonstrates viable routes for reducing dependence on conventional energy and limiting greenhouse gas emissions [100].
Waste reduction is also prominent, with 24 studies, targeting both packaging waste and product loss caused by temperature fluctuations and spoilage. Technology convergence, including IoT sensing, blockchain traceability, and digital twins, supports condition tracking and earlier intervention, while AI/ML optimization models are used to improve capacity planning and allocation to reduce waste and emissions simultaneously [12,31]. Overall, the review highlights a continuing need for standardized sustainability metrics, broader assessment frameworks (including social and economic dimensions), and more consistent evaluation practices to compare impacts across contexts and technologies.
Emissions reduction is another major focus, with 20 papers addressing strategies for mitigation. Regulatory pressures and environmentally conscious consumers continue to drive the decarbonization of logistics [46]. Emerging digital systems, such as blockchain-based traceability platforms and AI-enabled route optimization, enhance transparency and operational efficiency, thereby lowering fuel use and emissions. Studies highlighting the deployment of electric vehicles and optimized delivery scheduling exemplify how digital innovation can separate economic performance from environmental degradation [49,101]. Additional models, including green cost calculation frameworks and the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for lightweight deliveries, offer innovative approaches for balancing cost efficiency, infection control, and emission reduction [109].
Figure 5. Sustainability initiatives through DT in cold chain. (Source: the authors’ analysis of Scopus records for the period 2009–2025).
Figure 5. Sustainability initiatives through DT in cold chain. (Source: the authors’ analysis of Scopus records for the period 2009–2025).
Sustainability 17 11202 g005

3.4. Applications and Benefits of Digital Transformation in Cold Supply Chains

Table 3 summarizes the wide-ranging benefits of integrating digital technologies into cold supply chains. These outcomes function not as isolated improvements but as interconnected drivers of broader transformation in cold chain management, which signals a shift from fragmented initiatives to a more cohesive, data-driven operational ecosystem.
Efficiency and productivity enhancements emerge as dominant themes across the reviewed literature. Numerous studies report notable reductions in costs, waste, and delivery times, alongside better vehicle utilization and resource management. These outcomes demonstrate how digital technologies streamline workflows, optimize asset use, and minimize inefficiencies throughout the cold chain. Quantitative evidence reinforces this impact, with results such as a 34.76% reduction in costs [108] and a 35% increase in deliveries [67] revealing the measurable contribution of DT to performance improvement.
On the other hand, efficiency does not exist in isolation. The reduction in discarded reefer containers and associated greenhouse gas emissions illustrates how operational efficiency directly supports sustainability goals [105]. Similarly, warehouse digitization contributes simultaneously to cost control and improved resource utilization [36,92]. These linkages highlight the holistic character of DT, where advancements in one domain generate reinforcing benefits across others.
Another recurrent benefit involves greater visibility and traceability across the supply chain. Blockchain platforms and RFID systems are widely recognized as central enablers for transparent product tracking, quality assurance, and reliable logistics information [128]. Enhanced traceability is particularly vital in temperature-sensitive logistics, where product safety and authenticity depend on real-time monitoring and the ability to verify origin and handling [123]. These capabilities build trust among stakeholders while reducing the incidence of counterfeit or compromised goods.
DT also strengthens decision-making capacity. The availability of real-time data and predictive analytics allows managers to anticipate risks, adjust temperature parameters, and improve inventory and procurement planning. For instance, some studies report measurable reductions in food waste and more accurate forecasts of purchase volumes, both of which enhance efficiency and resource allocation [65,118,121]. Beyond internal improvements, enhanced service quality and delivery performance have also elevated customer satisfaction [39,123]. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that DT not only optimizes internal operations but also creates tangible value for end consumers through reliability, transparency, and service excellence.
Table 3. Applications and benefits of DT in cold chains.
Table 3. Applications and benefits of DT in cold chains.
Benefits of Digital Transformation in Cold ChainReferenceDescription
Improved Efficiency and Productivity[34]Improves operational effectiveness and enhanced customer satisfaction, with the obsolescence rate for handling environmentally sensitive products decreasing from 13% to 8%.
[49]Reduces the total delivery cost by 3.30% and 4.93% compared to other algorithms.
[67]Results in a 35% increase in deliveries and a 3.23% reduction in forklift travel distances, leading to lower operational costs and enhanced logistics efficiency.
[68]Improves transparency, traceability, and efficiency in logistics operations, enhances service quality, and strengthens data security and management.
[99]Achieves a minimum comprehensive loss value of 3.374, demonstrating superior sustainability compared with constant low-temperature storage.
[105]Reduces discarded reefer containers by 42.1% and associated GHG emissions by 21.8%, demonstrating the technology’s effectiveness in improving food safety and lowering costs.
[108]Results in 34.76% reduction in costs and a 15.6% reduction in resource wastage, which improves overall resource utilization and minimizes unnecessary expenses.
[111]Cuts vehicle requirements from 12 to 6, revealing higher logistics efficiency.
[77,85,94,96]Improves efficiency through smart logistics platforms that provide real-time visualization, automated alerts, and intelligent decision support.
[74,76,93,103,129] Optimizes cold chain logistics operations through improved scheduling, distribution, and warehouse management.
Enhanced Visibility and Traceability[29]Provides blockchain-based traceability solutions tackle the shortcomings of centralized traceability solutions.
[40]Enhances data processing and supervision, supports evidence-based decisions, improves logistics flow, and safeguards food safety.
[13,53]Strengthens traceability and quality control, improves efficiency, reduces medication risks, and enhances transparency, trust, and secure data management.
[41,59]Improves transparency, traceability, and accountability, strengthens quality assurance, and increases efficiency across the food supply chain.
[84]Improves the efficiency of food-cold chain logistics traceability through Bar code technology and RFID.
Enhanced Sustainability[73]Reduces average energy consumption by 87.04% compared to battery powered systems and decreases costs by 15.3% when compared to traditional battery powered wireless sensing systems.
[100]Enables prolonged operation without direct sunlight through PCMs.
[99]Reduces emissions and costs while optimizing energy use and logistics efficiency.
[101]Improves efficiency and traceability using blockchain and sensors to monitor environmental conditions in fresh food distribution.
Cost Optimization[55]Improves recognition accuracy, achieving 97.4% with three feature values and 98.6% with six feature values, while maintaining low-cost increases for temperature management in cold chain logistics
[67]Delivers a 35% rise in deliveries, a 3.23% reduction in forklift travel, and 10–15% lower labor and resource costs, yielding annual savings of EUR 26,880–40,320.
[68]Shows an increase of 32% in total income and improves environmental criteria in a real-world case study on the poultry supply chain. Additionally, a 4% reduction in total profit can lead to a 12% increase in total greenness and human health.
[92,116] Optimizes costs through greater efficiency, better resource use, streamlined warehouse operations, and cost-effective system design.
[108]Achieves a 34.76% reduction in costs and a 15.6% reduction in resource wastage, which improves overall resource utilization and minimizes unnecessary expenses.
[110]Improves monitoring accuracy, achieving prediction errors as low as 0.98 °F surpassing manufacturer-reported temperature precision.
[41,63,97,123]Strengthens quality management and data integrity, enhances trust and transparency, improves tracking and tracing efficiency, and reinforces quality and safety assurance in frozen and chilled product distribution.
Improved Quality and Safety[47]Enables continuous temperature monitoring, identification of critical breach points, and data-driven temperature control, ensuring stronger vaccine preservation.
[65]Enables real-time collection of temperature and humidity data, improving quality control and reducing food waste.
[33,114,123,127] Enhances quality management and data integrity, strengthens transparency and trust, supports informed decision-making and demand forecasting, optimizes transportation, reduces food waste, and improves visibility, risk assessment, and scenario simulation for proactive management.
Enhanced Decision-Making[45]Reduces food wastage about 30% globally each year due to poor supply chain management.
[89]Provides detailed insight into fruit quality degradation during transport, showing that fruits lose 43–85% of their quality before reaching retail outlets.
[112]Reduces spoilage rates of 25–30% in fruits, preventing nearly 12 million tons of annual losses.
[39,111,113,118]Improves visibility, traceability, and efficiency, optimizes resource use, reduces product loss, boosts sustainability and customer satisfaction through reliable data and logistics tracking.
Improved Customer Satisfaction[67]Results in a 35% increase in deliveries and a 3.23% reduction in forklift travel, lowering operational costs and enhancing logistics efficiency during peak demand periods.
[121]Achieves 96.35% accuracy, 97% precision, and 94.89% recall in predicting commodity purchase volume, showing the effectiveness of technology in enhancing supply chain management.

3.5. Challenges of Digital Transformation in Cold Supply Chains

Although DT delivers substantial benefits to cold supply chains, it also introduces complex challenges that must be strategically managed. Literature identifies barriers across technological, economic, data-related, organizational, operational, and regulatory domains (see Figure 6). If unaddressed, these constraints can limit adoption, reduce effectiveness, and ultimately weaken the transformative potential of digital initiatives.
Technological challenges remain among the most significant. The cold chain’s diverse stakeholders and legacy infrastructure complicate the integration of modern solutions. Hence, deploying and connecting systems such as IoT devices, AI platforms, and blockchain networks within existing frameworks require considerable coordination [119]. Another persistent obstacle is achieving interoperability and reliable data exchange across systems, as is scalability to accommodate fluctuating demand and long-term growth [45,79]. Therefore, robust architecture is needed to address these issues, in addition to standardized protocols and system designs that support flexibility and sustained performance.
Besides, the economic constraints shape the pace of adoption. The high capital requirements for advanced technologies remain a major deterrent, specifically for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) [43,46]. As a result, pressure to demonstrate short-term ROI, combined with limited financial support, restricts spending on infrastructure, training, and maintenance. These realities highlight the importance of innovative financing models, scalable solutions, and clearer articulation of long-term value to justify continued investment.
The digitalization of cold chains also generates vast volumes of data that require secure and reliable management. It is also critical to safeguard sensitive information from cyber threats, yet connectivity across multiple partners increases exposure to security breaches [130]. Hence, maintaining data integrity, ensuring accuracy, consistency, and reliability throughout the data life cycle is equally vital [117,130]. Conversely, weak governance can result in flawed insights and operational inefficiencies. Therefore, strong data governance frameworks, quality standards, and compliance mechanisms are essential to preserve trust and accountability.
Beyond the technological and economic considerations, organizational and human factors play a critical role in the success of DT. Insufficient preparedness within organizations, resistance to change, and a lack of digital readiness can significantly hinder implementation efforts [43,120,131]. Fostering a culture of technological acceptance among employees and providing comprehensive training programs are crucial but often challenging. The limited availability of personnel with the necessary expertise to implement, manage, and maintain advanced technologies further compounds these difficulties. Effective stakeholder collaboration and change management strategies are vital to ensure that employees are equipped and motivated to embrace DT.
Operational and logistical challenges compound these challenges. The integration of diverse technologies into unified systems requires detailed planning, while unpredictable events and disruptions further strain coordination [132]. As such, maintaining real-time visibility and control across extended networks and ensuring efficient information sharing remain ongoing difficulties [109]. To overcome them, it depends on adaptable workflows, agile management, and resilient system design.
Figure 6. Summarized challenges of DT in cold chain. (Source: the authors’ analysis of Scopus records for the period 2009–2025).
Figure 6. Summarized challenges of DT in cold chain. (Source: the authors’ analysis of Scopus records for the period 2009–2025).
Sustainability 17 11202 g006
Finally, regulatory and standardization barriers also impede progress, as compliance with evolving legal frameworks and data protection regulations is essential for responsible technology use [133]. Yet, the absence of universally accepted standards for technology deployment and data exchange constrains interoperability and scalability [29,45]. Therefore, establishing clearer industry standards and harmonized regulatory guidelines is central to enabling consistency, accountability, and sustainable innovation in the digital cold chain.

4. Research Gaps and Further Research Recommendations

This section consolidates the review’s contributions and identifies research gaps that require targeted investigation. The synthesis of 107 studies (2009–2025) shows rising interest in DT of the cold chain, yet several areas remain underexplored.

4.1. Limitations and Future Research Recommendations

The synthesis of 107 studies confirms that digital technologies are beginning to address long-standing problems in cold supply chains—especially temperature integrity, energy intensity, and limited end-to-end visibility across production, storage, transport, and retail. Nevertheless, the evidence shows that DT remains fragmented, and several gaps persist. These relate to the integration of technologies across stages, the systematic assessment of sustainability and economic performance, the scarcity of robust empirical validation, and the underexplored organizational and policy conditions needed to scale these innovations.
First, the literature consistently determines challenges related to quality and safety, energy consumption, and end-to-end traceability as the main constraints on cold-chain performance. These issues cut across production, storage, transport, and retail, which affect both cost and public health [49,65]. To address these multifaceted challenges, a range of technological solutions has been proposed, including sensing and IoT systems for real-time monitoring, analytics and AI for prediction and control, automation for process optimization, and blockchain for data security and traceability. While such solutions show promise, most studies remain isolated by stage or technology. Future work should test integrated, cross-stage frameworks that combine multiple tools, assess sustainability through standardized metrics and life-cycle assessments (LCAs), and evaluate financial viability, particularly for SMEs.
Empirical validation can be strengthened through structured assessment and experimentation. As such, maturity-assessment models can benchmark an organization’s digital competence, which reveals progression from manual control to predictive, IoT-based monitoring [134]. On top of this, applying AI Application Programming Interface (API) to enhance functionality is another future research area. API is defined as the connective nodes of digital components and an instrumental enabler of the integration of different systems and actors [135]. Furthermore, employing physical testbeds (i.e., PhyNetLab) offer a real-scale environment with interconnected, computationally and communicatively enabled physical objects, is crucial for realistic testing and validation in this domain [136]. Future research should use these instruments to develop standardized evaluation frameworks that link technological sophistication with measurable gains in efficiency, reliability, and energy savings.
Second, digital twin technology represents a pivotal enabler of transformation, which provides virtual replicas that simulate and optimize cold-chain operations [67]. Evidence shows value across all stages, from storage to distribution, through enhanced visibility, predictive control, and proactive quality management [89]. Yet implementation remains limited by model accuracy, data integration, interoperability, and cost [32]. Given these insights, future studies should establish standardized design and validation protocols, explore adaptive and learning twins that update in real-time, and investigate their coupling with AI and blockchain to balance transparency, privacy, and economic feasibility.
Third, sustainability now anchors DT research in cold chains, with studies emphasizing energy efficiency, emission reduction, and waste minimization [99]. IoT-enabled monitoring and adaptive control optimize energy use, while renewable integration and traceability systems reduce losses. Building upon this progress, future research should establish consistent sustainability metrics, extend LCAs to digital technology footprints, and examine economic and social trade-offs of green innovation. Equally vital is designing incentive mechanisms, including financial, regulatory, or collaborative, that accelerate adoption of sustainable digital practices.
Fourth, digital technologies collectively enhance operational efficiency, visibility, and customer satisfaction. Empirical studies document tangible benefits, including lower costs, reduced resource waste, optimized delivery times, and improved quality assurance [67,118]. In addition, real-time analytics support proactive decisions on temperature control and risk management, while transparent tracking builds consumer trust. The next research step is to quantify how these operational, environmental, and service gains interact through evaluating long-term effects on competitiveness and resilience and codifying best practices for technology deployment across sectors.
Finally, persistent challenges span technological, economic, and regulatory domains. As such, the integration of heterogeneous systems, interoperability, scalability, and cybersecurity remain pressing concerns [79,117]. Addressing these issues requires coordinated advances in data governance, financing models, and managerial capabilities. Building on these challenges, future research should concentrate on several aspects. First, it should support a shift from reactive monitoring to proactive management through predictive analytics and AI models capable of anticipating temperature deviations, equipment failures, and logistical disruptions before they occur [137]. Second, as discussed by Zemanek et al. [138], integrating intelligent and autonomous systems, such as drones and self-driving vehicles, can enhance delivery efficiency, safety, and sustainability within regulated environments. Third, the concept of personalized cold-chain solutions where AI-driven analytics tailor storage and transportation parameters to product, consumer, or regional characteristics could enable adaptive temperature and routing strategies that balance quality preservation, cost efficiency, and sustainability [9]. Finally, building adaptive and resilient networks that withstand and recover from global supply disruptions by combining AI-based risk forecasting with blockchain-enabled transparency and diversification represents another promising direction [139].

4.2. Managerial and Policy Implications

The findings of the review carry actionable implications for practitioners, managers, and policymakers. For practitioners, the results provide a roadmap to identify and adopt digital tools that directly address operational challenges while advancing sustainability goals [4]. For managers, phased digital adoption strategies should evolve from basic IoT and RFID monitoring to advanced analytics, automation, and digital twin integration [33,45,46]. Additionally, effective implementation demands cross-functional coordination between operations, IT, and sustainability teams to prevent data silos and enhance visibility [43,98]. Another vital aspect is financial justification through total cost-of-ownership and ROI analysis given the high capital requirements of advanced systems [49,99]. Managers must also strengthen data-governance frameworks to mitigate cybersecurity and interoperability risks [50,51], while cultivating a digitally skilled workforce through continuous learning and AI-assisted decision-making [120,131]. From a policy standpoint, supportive regulatory ecosystems are essential for scaling DT. Hence, governments should incentivize adoption through targeted subsidies, public–private R&D programs, and standardized interoperability protocols, while addressing data privacy and ethical concerns [140]. Harmonized global standards can ensure equitable technology diffusion, especially among SMEs. As such, the managerial, practitioner, and policy implications highlight that cold chain DT is a systemic shift demanding strategic alignment, institutional support, and human readiness not merely a technical upgrade.

5. Conclusions

This study highlights the transformative impact of digital technologies on the evolution of cold chain operations. Through a systematic analysis of 107 studies published between 2009 and 2025, conducted under the PRISMA framework, the research revealed how DT is redefining the management of temperature-sensitive logistics. Technologies such as IoT, AI, blockchain, and digital twins are collectively modernizing the sector through enabling new levels of efficiency, transparency, and sustainability. These innovations address persistent challenges related to product quality, safety assurance, and the long-standing need for end-to-end visibility and traceability across the supply chain.
The findings confirm that DT extends far beyond the adoption of isolated tools and instead represents a strategic shift toward intelligent, data-driven, and sustainable cold chains. The integration of real-time monitoring, predictive analytics, and automation has enhanced temperature control, optimized energy consumption, and supported proactive decision-making throughout the supply chain. Additionally, sustainability has emerged as a central theme, as digital technologies facilitate energy optimization, waste reduction, and lower carbon emissions. Nevertheless, the realization of these benefits continues to be challenged by the high cost of implementation, interoperability limitations, data governance concerns, and organizational resistance to change. These constraints highlight the importance of developing adaptable and inclusive strategies that align technological innovation with economic feasibility and institutional readiness.
Nonetheless, this review has limitations that should be considered when interpreting its findings. The search was restricted to English-language publications indexed in Scopus, which may have excluded relevant studies captured in other outlets. In addition, given the heterogeneity of study designs, sectors, and reported outcomes, the evidence was synthesized descriptively rather than through a quantitative meta-analysis; therefore, the conclusions should be understood as thematic insights rather than pooled effect estimates, particularly in a rapidly evolving DT landscape.
Looking ahead, the review identifies several gaps and areas for future exploration. It highlighted the need to go beyond descriptive accounts and focus on developing integrative frameworks that unify the technical, economic, and environmental dimensions of DT. Also, there is a pressing need to design models that combine the strengths of multiple technologies to achieve holistic visibility and operational resilience across cold supply chains. Moreover, establishing standardized sustainability metrics and conducting comprehensive life cycle assessments would also provide a clearer understanding of the environmental implications of digital adoption. Furthermore, developing maturity assessment models could help organizations evaluate their progress and identify areas requiring improvement. The emergence of predictive and autonomous systems, supported by AI and digital twins, offers additional opportunities for proactive and adaptive cold chain management. Future research should also emphasize experimental validation through physical testbeds and API-based integrations that link digital tools across platforms. Ethical considerations, particularly concerning data privacy, transparency, and accountability, should also remain central to these technological developments to ensure trust and fairness in digital ecosystems.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su172411202/s1, Table S1: PRISMA 2020 Checklist; Table S2: PRISMA 2020 for Abstracts Checklist [141].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.A. and M.B.-D.; Methodology, N.A. and M.B.-D.; Formal analysis, N.A. and M.B.-D.; Writing—original draft preparation, N.A.; Writing—review and editing, N.A. and M.B.-D.; Visualization, N.A. and M.B.-D.; Supervision, M.B.-D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

This article represents the opinions of the authors and does not mean to represent the position or opinions of the American University of Sharjah.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kumar Kanike, U. Factors Disrupting Supply Chain Management in Manufacturing Industries. J. Supply Chain Manag. Sci. 2023, 4, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Piprani, A.Z.; Jaafar, N.I.; Ali, S.M.; Mubarik, M.S.; Shahbaz, M. Multi-Dimensional Supply Chain Flexibility and Supply Chain Resilience: The Role of Supply Chain Risks Exposure. Oper. Manag. Res. 2022, 15, 307–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Siagian, H.; Tarigan, Z.J.H.; Jie, F. Supply Chain Integration Enables Resilience, Flexibility, and Innovation to Improve Business Performance in COVID-19 Era. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, I.J.; Paulraj, A. Understanding Supply Chain Management: Critical Research and a Theoretical Framework. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2004, 42, 131–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ryciuk, U.; Zabrocka, A. Investigating Challenges and Responses in Supply Chain Management amid Unforeseen Events. Eng. Manag. Prod. Serv. 2024, 16, 30–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Holloway, S. The Role of Supply Chain Flexibility in Adapting Marketing Strategies to Changing Consumer Preferences. Preprints 2024. Available online: https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202406.1759 (accessed on 10 December 2025).
  7. Lee, J. Leveraging Digital Tools and Analytics for Temperature Management in Cold Chain Systems for Gene Therapies. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  8. Eveloy, V.; Ayou, D.S. Sustainable District Cooling Systems: Status, Challenges, and Future Opportunities, with Emphasis on Cooling-Dominated Regions. Energies 2019, 12, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fatorachian, H.; Pawar, K. Waste Efficiency in Cold Supply Chains through Industry 4.0-Enabled Digitalisation. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 2025, 18, 2461564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ononiwu, M.I.; Onwuzulike, O.C.; Shitu, K. The Role of Digital Business Transformation in Enhancing Organizational Agility. World J. Adv. Res. Rev. 2024, 23, 285–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gillespie, J.; da Costa, T.P.; Cama-Moncunill, X.; Cadden, T.; Condell, J.; Cowderoy, T.; Ramsey, E.; Murphy, F.; Kull, M.; Gallagher, R.; et al. Real-Time Anomaly Detection in Cold Chain Transportation Using IoT Technology. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jackson, I.; Namdar, J.; Saénz, M.J.; Elmquist, R.A., III; Dávila Novoa, L.R. Revolutionize Cold Chain: An AI/ML Driven Approach to Overcome Capacity Shortages. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2025, 63, 2190–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zeng, W.; Wang, Y.; Liang, K.; Li, J.; Niu, X. Advancing Emergency Supplies Management: A Blockchain-Based Traceability System for Cold-Chain Medicine Logistics. Adv. Theory Simul. 2024, 7, 2300704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shoji, K.; Schudel, S.; Shrivastava, C.; Onwude, D.; Defraeye, T. Optimizing the Postharvest Supply Chain of Imported Fresh Produce with Physics-Based Digital Twins. J. Food Eng. 2022, 329, 111077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tranfield, D.; Denyer, D.; Smart, P. Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. Br. J. Manag. 2003, 14, 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, B.; Mohammad, J. Sustainability of Perishable Food Cold Chain Logistics: A Systematic Literature Review. Sage Open 2024, 14, 21582440241280455. [Google Scholar]
  17. Rolf, B.; Beier, A.; Jackson, I.; Müller, M.; Reggelin, T.; Stuckenschmidt, H.; Lang, S. A Review on Unsupervised Learning Algorithms and Applications in Supply Chain Management. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2024, 63, 1933–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Al-Assaf, K.; Bahroun, Z.; Ahmed, V. Transforming Service Quality in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review of Healthcare 4.0 and Its Impact on Healthcare Service Quality. Informatics 2024, 11, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, S.; Yao, L.; Wang, W.; Tang, S. Developing an Effective and Sustainable National Immunisation Programme in China: Issues and Challenges. Lancet Public Health 2022, 7, e1064–e1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Prosser, W.; Folorunso, O.; McCord, J.; Roche, G.; Tien, M.; Hatch, B.; Spisak, C.; Genovese, E.; Pare, B.; Donatien, K.; et al. Redesigning Immunization Supply Chains: Results from Three Country Analyses. Vaccine 2021, 39, 2246–2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Flavia, A.; Fred, B.; Eleanor, T. Gaps in Vaccine Management Practices during Vaccination Outreach Sessions in Rural Settings in Southwestern Uganda. BMC Infect. Dis. 2023, 23, 758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, Y.; Chen, X.D. An Optimization Model for the Vehicle Routing Problem in Multi-Product Frozen Food Delivery. J. Appl. Res. Technol. 2014, 12, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lu, S.; Wang, X. Toward an Intelligent Solution for Perishable Food Cold Chain Management. In Proceedings of the 2016 7th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS), Beijing, China, 26–28 August 2016; IEEE: New York City, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 852–856. [Google Scholar]
  24. Babagolzadeh, M.; Shrestha, A.; Abbasi, B.; Zhang, Y.; Woodhead, A.; Zhang, A. Sustainable Cold Supply Chain Management under Demand Uncertainty and Carbon Tax Regulation. Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ. 2020, 80, 102245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Heidari, R.; Ghazanfari, M.; Rasouli, M.R. A Decision Support System for Resilient Vehicle Route Planning Using Mathematical Modeling and Artificial Neural Networks: A Case Study. Kybernetes, 2024; ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, L.-Y.; Tseng, M.-L.; Wang, C.-H.; Xiao, C.; Fei, T. Low-Carbon CSold Chain Logistics Using Ribonucleic Acid-Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 233, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, J.; Li, Y. Vehicle Routing Problem for Cold-Chain Drug Distribution with Epidemic Spread Situation. Expert. Syst. Appl. 2025, 262, 125186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Garfield, E. Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation. Science 1972, 178, 471–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sunny, J.; Undralla, N.; Madhusudanan Pillai, V. Supply Chain Transparency through Blockchain-Based Traceability: An Overview with Demonstration. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020, 150, 106895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Defraeye, T.; Tagliavini, G.; Wu, W.; Prawiranto, K.; Schudel, S.; Assefa Kerisima, M.; Verboven, P.; Bühlmann, A. Digital Twins Probe into Food Cooling and Biochemical Quality Changes for Reducing Losses in Refrigerated Supply Chains. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 149, 778–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Martínez-Sala, A.S.; Egea-López, E.; García-Sánchez, F.; García-Haro, J. Tracking of Returnable Packaging and Transport Units with Active RFID in the Grocery Supply Chain. Comput. Ind. 2009, 60, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Onwude, D.I.; Chen, G.; Eke-emezie, N.; Kabutey, A.; Khaled, A.Y.; Sturm, B. Recent Advances in Reducing Food Losses in the Supply Chain of Fresh Agricultural Produce. Processes 2020, 8, 1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ivanov, D. Intelligent Digital Twin (IDT) for Supply Chain Stress-Testing, Resilience, and Viability. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2023, 263, 108938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tsang, Y.; Choy, K.; Wu, C.; Ho, G.; Lam, H.; Koo, P. An IoT-Based Cargo Monitoring System for Enhancing Operational Effectiveness under a Cold Chain Environment. Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manag. 2017, 9, 1847979017749063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ivanov, D. Conceptualisation of a 7-Element Digital Twin Framework in Supply Chain and Operations Management. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2024, 62, 2220–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bhattacharyya, R.; Floerkemeier, C.; Sarma, S. RFID Tag Antenna Based Temperature Sensing. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on RFID (IEEE RFID 2010), Orlando, FL, USA, 14–16 April 2010; IEEE: New York City, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 8–15. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang, X.; He, Q.; Matetic, M.; Jemric, T.; Zhang, X. Development and Evaluation on a Wireless Multi-Gas-Sensors System for Improving Traceability and Transparency of Table Grape Cold Chain. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2017, 135, 195–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Urbano, O.; Perles, A.; Pedraza, C.; Rubio-Arraez, S.; Castelló, M.L.; Ortola, M.D.; Mercado, R. Cost-Effective Implementation of a Temperature Traceability System Based on Smart RFID Tags and IoT Services. Sensors 2020, 20, 1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Tang, Y.M.; Chau, K.Y.; Kuo, W.T.; Liu, X.X. IoT-Based Information System on Cold-Chain Logistics Service Quality (ICCLSQ) Management in Logistics 4.0. Inf. Syst. Front. 2024, 26, 689–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sun, X. Research on Cold Chain Food Logistics Traceability Method Based on Big Data Technology; Association for Computing Machinery (ACM): New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Jiong, Z.; Zhang, X.; Li, B.; Chen, E. Development and Assessment of Blockchain-IoT-Based Traceability System for Frozen Aquatic Product. J. Food Process Eng. 2021, 44, e13669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jiao, X.; Qin, Q. Understanding Food Cold Chain: Balance and a Sustainable Future. J. Int. Econ. Glob. Gov. 2024, 1, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vandana; Sangwa, N.R.; Ertz, M.; Shashi. Sustainable and Resilient Cold Chains: Enhancing Adaptability, Consistency, and Digital Transformation for Success in a Turbulent Market. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2024, 33, 6689–6715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, Z.; Zhang, C.; Mu, X. Decentralized Solution for Cold Chain Logistics Combining IoT and Blockchain Technology. Taiwan Ubiquitous Inf. 2023, 8, 47–61. [Google Scholar]
  45. Vedashree, R.; Ashok, P.; Pillai, S. Transforming Cold Chain Management: The Role of Digital Twins in Post-Harvest Logistics. In Proceedings of the 2024 2nd World Conference on Communication and Computing, WCONF 2024, Raipur, India, 12–14 July 2024; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  46. Mustafa, M.F.M.S.; Navaranjan, N.; Demirovic, A. Food Cold Chain Logistics and Management: A Review of Current Development and Emerging Trends. J. Agric. Food Res. 2024, 18, 101343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lamba, H.K.; Sharma, D.; Dhir, S.; Sushil, S.; Ghosh, R.S.; Bagchi, S.N.; Singh, S.; Pooja, P.; Kothari, K.; Monfardini, E.; et al. Ensuring Vaccine Temperature Integrity: Monitoring from Storage to Last-Mile Delivery. Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag. 2024, 25, 559–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Burgess, S.; Wang, X.; Rahbari, A.; Hangi, M. Optimisation of a Portable Phase-Change Material (PCM) Storage System for Emerging Cold-Chain Delivery Applications. J. Energy Storage 2022, 52, 104855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhao, M. Optimization of Distribution Paths in Cold Chain Logistics Management Based on IFW-ABC Algorithm. Intell. Decis. Technol. 2024, 18, 1711–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Akindotei, O.; Emmanuel, I.; Awotiwon, B.O.; Otakwu, A. Blockchain Integration in Critical Systems Enhancing Transparency, Efficiency, and Real-Time Data Security in Agile Project Management, Decentralized Finance (DeFi), and Cold Chain Management. Int. J. Sci. Res. Mod. Technol. IJSRMT 2024, 3, 19–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Habib, G.; Sharma, S.; Ibrahim, S.; Ahmad, I.; Qureshi, S.; Ishfaq, M. Blockchain Technology: Benefits, Challenges, Applications, and Integration of Blockchain Technology with Cloud Computing. Future Internet 2022, 14, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yang, L.; Zhang, H.; Tang, S. RFID Technology Application on the Supervision of Cold-Chain Logistics Warehousing. In Advanced Graphic Communications, Packaging Technology and Materials; Ouyang, Y., Xu, M., Yang, L., Ouyang, Y., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2016; pp. 619–626. [Google Scholar]
  53. Hu, B.; Guo, H.; Tao, X.; Zhang, Y. Construction of Digital Twin System for Cold Chain Logistics Stereo Warehouse. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 73850–73862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhan, X.; Wu, W.; Shen, L.; Liao, W.; Zhao, Z.; Xia, J. Industrial Internet of Things and Unsupervised Deep Learning Enabled Real-Time Occupational Safety Monitoring in Cold Storage Warehouse. Saf. Sci. 2022, 152, 105766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Meng, X.; Xie, R.; Liao, J.; Shen, X.; Yang, S. A Cost-Effective over-Temperature Alarm System for Cold Chain Delivery. J. Food Eng. 2024, 368, 111914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, Y.; Tan, C.; Ip, W.H.; Wu, C.H. Dynamic Blockchain Adoption for Freshness-Keeping in the Fresh Agricultural Product Supply Chain. Expert Syst. Appl. 2023, 217, 119494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zou, Y.; Wu, J.; Wang, X.; Morales, K.; Liu, G.; Manzardo, A. An Improved Artificial Neural Network Using Multi-Source Data to Estimate Food Temperature during Multi-Temperature Delivery. J. Food Eng. 2023, 351, 111518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Vergine, V.; Sergi, I.; Montanaro, T.; Shumba, A.T.; Luca Benvenuto, F.; Patrono, L. Leveraging Internet of Things and Distributed Ledger Technology for Cold Chain Management in Freight Transportation. In Proceedings of the 2023 8th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies (SpliTech), Split/Bol, Croatia, 20–23 June 2023; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  59. Spitalleri, A.; Kavasidis, I.; Cartelli, V.; Mineo, R.; Rundo, F.; Palazzo, S.; Spampinato, C.; Giordano, D. BioTrak: A Blockchain-Based Platform for Food Chain Logistics Traceability. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Communication, Networking and Services (ICCNS), Valencia, Spain, 19–22 June 2023; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 105–110. [Google Scholar]
  60. Shi, Y.; Lin, Y.; Lim, M.K.; Tseng, M.-L.; Tan, C.; Li, Y. An Intelligent Green Scheduling System for Sustainable Cold Chain Logistics. Expert Syst. Appl. 2022, 209, 118378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, R.; Ye, J.; Li, S. The Road Cold Chain Transportation Information Traceability Platform Based on “IOT+ Blockchain” Allows Cold Chain Transportation Management More Credible. In Proceedings of the 2021 6th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Engineering (ICITE 2021), Beijing, China, 29–31 October 2021; Zhang, Z., Ed.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2022; pp. 1015–1024. [Google Scholar]
  62. Sun, Y.; Wang, H. Construction of Third-Party Cold Chain Logistics Platform Based On Radio Frequency Identification Technology. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 452, 042186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Giannoglou, M.; Touli, A.; Platakou, E.; Tsironi, T.; Taoukis, P.S. Predictive Modeling and Selection of TTI Smart Labels for Monitoring the Quality and Shelf-Life of Frozen Seafood. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2014, 26, 294–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lukasse, L.J.S.; Schouten, R.E.; Castelein, R.B.; Lawton, R.; Paillart, M.J.M.; Guo, X.; Woltering, E.J.; Tromp, S.; Snels, J.C.M.A.; Defraeye, T. Perspectives on the Evolution of Reefer Containers for Transporting Fresh Produce. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 140, 104147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Eze, J.; Duan, Y.; Eze, E.; Ramanathan, R.; Ajmal, T. Machine Learning-Based Optimal Temperature Management Model for Safety and Quality Control of Perishable Food Supply Chain. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 27228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bhatt, T.; Baser, M.; Tyagi, A.; Ng, E.Y.K. CRYOMOVE: Cold Chain Real-Time Management of Vaccine Delivery Using PCM and Deep Learning. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2024, 255, 123962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lorenc, A. Cross-Docking Layout Optimization in FlexSim Software Based on Cold Chain 4PL Company. Sustainability 2024, 16, 9620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Alshdadi, A.; Kamel, S.; Alsolami, E.; Lytras, M.D.; Boubaker, S. An IoT Smart System for Cold Supply Chain Storage and Transportation Μanagement. Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res. 2024, 14, 13167–13172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kumar, N.; Mohit, T.; Sachdeva, A. Model Development and Assessment for Temperature Processing Technologies Used in Cold Chain Industries. Adv. Mater. Process. Technol. 2024, 10, 2021–2044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Arabsheybani, A.; Alireza, A.K.; Pishvaee, M.S. Sustainable Cold Supply Chain Design for Livestock and Perishable Products Using Data-Driven Robust Optimization. Int. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. Manag. 2024, 19, 305–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Feng, Z.; Jin, P.; Li, G. Investment Decision of Blockchain Technology in Fresh Food Supply Chains Considering Misreporting Behavior. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Verma Pargaien, A.; Pargaien, S.; Adhikari, M.; Maan, M.; Sharma, S.; Joshi, H. The Role of IOT for Monitoring the Wastage of Vaccines Due to Poor Cold Chain Management. In Proceedings of the 2021 Fifth International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC), Palladam, India, 11–13 November 2021; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 78–86. [Google Scholar]
  73. Xiao, X.; Fu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, X. Sustainable Solar Powered Battery-Free Wireless Sensing for Food Cold Chain Management. Sens. Int. 2022, 3, 100157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Park, Y.; Kim, S.; Ryu, K. Prediction of Refrigerated Vehicle Environment for Optimization of Cold-Chain Logistics. ICIC Express Lett. Part B Appl. 2023, 14, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Panigrahi, B.S.; Vanitha, A.; Palav, M.R.; Tilak Babu, S.B.G.; Nair, A.M.; Bogiri, N. IoT Applications in Cold Chain Management for Pharmaceuticals: Ensuring Product Integrity and Safety. In Proceedings of the 2024 5th International Conference on Recent Trends in Computer Science and Technology (ICRTCST), Jamshedpur, India, 15–16 April 2024; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2024; pp. 66–70. [Google Scholar]
  76. Wu, W.; Shen, L.; Zhao, Z.; Harish, A.R.; Zhong, R.Y.; Huang, G.Q. Internet of Everything and Digital Twin Enabled Service Platform for Cold Chain Logistics. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2023, 33, 100443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cheng, C. Application of 5G Private Network and Internet of Things in Smart Cold Chain Logistics Park. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Conference on Telecommunications, Optics and Computer Science (TOCS), Virtually, 11–12 December 2022; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 277–281. [Google Scholar]
  78. Ramanathan, U.; Ramanathan, R.; Adefisan, A.; Da Costa, T.; Cama-Moncunill, X.; Samriya, G. Adapting Digital Technologies to Reduce Food Waste and Improve Operational Efficiency of a Frozen Food Company—The Case of Yumchop Foods in the UK. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Sim, C.; Zhang, H.; Chang, M.L. Improving End-to-End Traceability and Pharma Supply Chain Resilience with Blockchain. Blockchain Healthc. Today 2022, 5, 10-30953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Masudin, I.; Ramadhani, A.; Restuputri, D.P.; Amallynda, I. The Effect of Traceability System and Managerial Initiative on Indonesian Food Cold Chain Performance: A COVID-19 Pandemic Perspective. Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag. 2021, 22, 331–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhao, S.; Li, Z.; Zhou, L. Construction of Logistics Network System Based on Internet+. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1176, 022027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Xu, J.-C.; Zhang, M.; Mujumdar, A.S.; Adhikari, B. Recent Developments in Smart Freezing Technology Applied to Fresh Foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 2835–2843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Nabiha, S.; Ezzeddine, T. Simulation of Cold Chain Traceability Based on RFID and WSN. In Proceedings of the 2015 2nd World Symposium on Web Applications and Networking (WSWAN), Sousse, Tunisia, 21–23 March 2015; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  84. Yu, X. A Research about the Tracing Technology and System Designing of Food-Cold Chain. In Proceedings of the 2011 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Electronic Commerce (AIMSEC), Zhengzhou, China, 8–10 August 2011; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 2729–2732. [Google Scholar]
  85. Wang, G.; Xu, W.; Wang, M. The Grid-Computing Based Instrumented Monitoring Platform for Cold Chain Logistics. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Logistics Engineering and Intelligent Transportation Systems, Wuhan, China, 26–28 November 2010; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  86. Rollo, A.; Gnoni, M.G. Performance Analysis of Rfid Applications in Cold Chain Management. In Business Performance Measurement and Management: New Contexts, Themes and Challenges; Taticchi, P., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 61–71. ISBN 978-3-642-04800-5. [Google Scholar]
  87. Sreevathsan, S.; Bhavana, B.K.; Debnath, S.; Mudliar, S.N. Advanced Computational Tools for Enhanced Food Quality and Safety. In Engineering Aspects of Food Quality and Safety; Hebbar, H.U., Sharma, R., Chaurasiya, R.S., Ranjan, S., Raghavarao, K.S.M.S., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 207–247. ISBN 978-3-031-30683-9. [Google Scholar]
  88. Lam, H.Y.; Tang, V.; Ho, G.T.S. A Digital Twins Model for Analyzing and Simulating Cold Chain Risks. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Information and Communication (ICAIIC), Bali, Indonesia, 20–23 February 2023; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 259–263. [Google Scholar]
  89. Shrivastava, C.; Schudel, S.; Shoji, K.; Onwude, D.; da Silva, F.P.; Turan, D.; Paillart, M.; Defraeye, T. Digital Twins for Selecting the Optimal Ventilated Strawberry Packaging Based on the Unique Hygrothermal Conditions of a Shipment from Farm to Retailer. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2023, 199, 112283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Onwude, D.; Cronje, P.; North, J.; Defraeye, T. Digital Replica to Unveil the Impact of Growing Conditions on Orange Postharvest Quality. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 14437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Huang, Y.-T.; Chou, C.-T.; Wen, C.-H.; Chen, M.-C. Optimized Vehicle Exploitation Period Decision in Cold-Chain Logistics Companies. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2024, 57, 101235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Emenike, C.C.; Eyk, N.P.V.; Hoffman, A.J. Improving Cold Chain Logistics through RFID Temperature Sensing and Predictive Modelling. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1–4 November 2016; pp. 2331–2338. [Google Scholar]
  93. Shi, H.; Zhang, Q.; Qin, J. Cold Chain Logistics and Joint Distribution: A Review of Fresh Logistics Modes. Systems 2024, 12, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Alwan, A.A.; Jaffer, Z.; Wasmi Zaydan, N.R.; Hussam, R.; Salman, H.D.; Shnain, A.H. Smart Logistics Based on Internet of Vehicles for Sustainable Supply Chain Management. In Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Smart Systems for Electrical, Electronics, Communication and Computer Engineering (ICSSEECC), Coimbatore, India, 28–29 June 2024; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2024; pp. 757–762. [Google Scholar]
  95. Moyo, E.H.; Carstens, S.; Walters, J. Simulation Model for a Sustainable Food Supply Chain in a Developing Country: A Case Study of the Banana Supply Chain in Malawi. Logistics 2024, 8, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wei, X.; Peng, Y.; Xiong, K. Intelligent Cold Chain Monitoring Platform Based on Internet of Things and Edge Computing. In Advances in Artificial Systems for Logistics Engineering IV; Hu, Z., Zhang, Q., He, M., Eds.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 187–196. [Google Scholar]
  97. Yadav, A.K.; Shweta; Kumar, D. Blockchain Technology and Vaccine Supply Chain: Exploration and Analysis of the Adoption Barriers in the Indian Context. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2023, 255, 108716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Yu, S.; Zhang, M.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, P.P.; Huang, G.Q. ESG transformation through private equity and digital twin in energy supply chain: An evolutionary game analysis. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2025; ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Chen, Q.; Qian, J.; Li, H.; Lin, X.; Li, J.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, Z. Dynamic Multi-Objective Time-Temperature Management for Climacteric Fruit Cold Storage Considering Ripeness Windows and Energy Consumption. J. Food Eng. 2025, 387, 112350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Cilenti, C.; Petruzziello, F.; Grilletto, A.; Aprea, C.; Maiorino, A. Utilizing Phase Change Materials for Sun-Powered Refrigerators: Experimental Validation in Outdoor Environments. Ann. Chim. Sci. Des. Mater. 2024, 48, 595–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Li, Y.; Lim, M.K.; Xiong, W.; Huang, X.; Shi, Y.; Wang, S. An Electric Vehicle Routing Model with Charging Stations Consideration for Sustainable Logistics. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2024, 124, 1076–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zhao, C.; Ma, X.; Wang, K. The Electric Vehicle Promotion in the Cold-Chain Logistics under Two-Sided Support Policy: An Evolutionary Game Perspective. Transp. Policy 2022, 121, 14–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Tang, F. Application of a Cold-Chain Logistics Distribution System Based on Cloud Computing and Web Delivery Date Management. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Supply Chain Manag. 2023, 16, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Meng, X.; He, Y.; He, L.; Zhao, C.; Wang, L.; You, W.; Zhu, J. A Review of the Energy-Saving Potential of Phase Change Material-Based Cascaded Refrigeration Systems in Chinese Food Cold Chain Industry. Energies 2024, 17, 4762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Jo, J.; Yi, S.; Lee, E. Including the Reefer Chain into Genuine Beef Cold Chain Architecture Based on Blockchain Technology. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 363, 132646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Liu, Z.; Huang, Y.-Q.; Shang, W.-L.; Zhao, Y.-J.; Yang, Z.-L.; Zhao, Z. Precooling Energy and Carbon Emission Reduction Technology Investment Model in a Fresh Food Cold Chain Based on a Differential Game. Appl. Energy 2022, 326, 119945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Xue, M. Research on Cold Storage Environment Monitoring System Based on ZigBee. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Security (ICSPCS 2024), Chengdu, China, 24–26 May 2024; Mahalle, P.N., Karras, D.A., Eds.; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2024; p. 17. [Google Scholar]
  108. Shi, J. Optimization of Frozen Goods Distribution Logistics Network Based on K-Means Algorithm and Priority Classification. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 22477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Liu, G.; Liu, Q.; Guo, H.; Xiang, M.; Sang, J. Optimization of “Vehicle-UAV” Joint Distribution Routing for Cold Chain Logistics Considering Risk of Epidemic Spreading and Green Cost. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0306127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Ayanoglu, M.B.; Uysal, I. ML Approach to Improve the Costs and Reliability of a Wireless Sensor Network. Sensors 2023, 23, 4303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Guan, X.; Li, G.; Zhou, H. Cold Chain Logistics Transportation Management Strategy Based on ABC-ACO Algorithm and Intelligent Digital. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Data Science and Network Security (ICDSNS), Tiptur, India, 28–29 July 2023; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  112. Huihui, L.; Na, L.; Qingqing, K. Research on Green Cold Chain Logistics Information System under Computer Big Data. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Computers, Information Processing and Advanced Education (CIPAE), Ottawa, ON, Canada, 26–28 August 2023; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 83–87. [Google Scholar]
  113. Zhang, C.; Wei, W. IoT Network for International Trade Cold Chain Logistics Tracking Based on Kalman Algorithm. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2022, 2022, 1608167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Gonzalez-Vidal, A.; Gomez-Bernal, P.; Mendoza-Bernal, J.; Skarmeta, A.F. BIGcoldTRUCKS: A BIG Data Dashboard for the Management of COLD Chain Logistics in Refrigerated TRUCKS. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Orlando, FL, USA, 15–18 December 2021; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 2894–2900. [Google Scholar]
  115. Cui, H. Intelligent Coordination Distribution of the Whole Supply Chain Based on the Internet of Things. Complexity 2021, 2021, 5555264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Xie, T.; Zhao, M. Research on Cold Chain Logistics Joint Distribution Model Based on Cloud Logistics. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IMCEC), Xi’an, China, 3–5 October 2016; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 802–806. [Google Scholar]
  117. Zhang, L.; Zhang, M.; Mujumdar, A.S.; Chen, Y. From Farm to Market: Research Progress and Application Prospects of Artificial Intelligence in the Frozen Fruits and Vegetables Supply Chain. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 153, 104730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Rahmanifar, G.; Mohammadi, M.; Golabian, M.; Sherafat, A.; Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M.; Fusco, G.; Colombaroni, C. Integrated Location and Routing for Cold Chain Logistics Networks with Heterogeneous Customer Demand. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2024, 38, 100573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Jiang, S.; Jia, S.; Guo, H. Internet of Things (IoT)-Enabled Framework for a Sustainable Vaccine Cold Chain Management System. Heliyon 2024, 10, e28910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Chavalala, M.M.; Bag, S.; Pretorius, J.H.C.; Rahman, M.S. A Multi-Method Study on the Barriers of the Blockchain Technology Application in the Cold Supply Chains. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2024, 37, 745–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Ye, W. E-Commerce Logistics and Supply Chain Network Optimization for Cross-Border. J. Grid Comput. 2024, 22, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Arora, M.; Ahmad, V.; Kumar, R.; Yamsani, N.; Amir, M.; Arora, J. Blockchain and Internet-of-Things: A Technological Solution for Issues in Cold Chain. In Proceedings of the 2024 3rd International Conference on Sentiment Analysis and Deep Learning (ICSADL), Bhimdatta, Nepal, 13–14 March 2024; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2024; pp. 632–636. [Google Scholar]
  123. Yang, C.; Lan, S.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, M.; Wu, W.; Huang, G.Q. Edge-Cloud Blockchain and IoE-Enabled Quality Management Platform for Perishable Supply Chain Logistics. IEEE Internet Things J. 2023, 10, 3264–3275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Zhang, X.; Li, Z.; Li, G. Impacts of Blockchain-Based Digital Transition on Cold Supply Chains with a Third-Party Logistics Service Provider. Transp. Res. E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2023, 170, 103014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Zhang, Y.; Li, C.; Xin, X. Stackelberg Game-Based Resource Allocation with Blockchain for Cold-Chain Logistics System. Comput. Mater. Contin. 2023, 75, 2429–2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Javaid, M.; Haleem, A.; Suman, R. Digital Twin Applications toward Industry 4.0: A Review. Cogn. Robot. 2023, 3, 71–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Nguyen, P.; Ivanov, D.; Sgarbossa, F. A Digital Twin–Based Approach to Reinforce Supply Chain Resilience: Simulation of Semiconductor Shortages. In Proceedings of the IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems, Trondheim, Norway, 17–21 September 2023; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 563–576. [Google Scholar]
  128. Ugochukwu, N.A.; Goyal, S.B.; Arumugam, S. Blockchain-Based IoT-Enabled System for Secure and Efficient Logistics Management in the Era of IR 4.0. J. Nanomater. 2022, 2022, 7295395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Shi, J. Simulation of Logistics Real Time Data Processing and Prediction Model Based on Decision Tree Algorithm. In Proceedings of the 2024 Asia-Pacific Conference on Software Engineering, Social Network Analysis and Intelligent Computing (SSAIC), New Delhi, India, 10–12 January 2024; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2024; pp. 954–959. [Google Scholar]
  130. Ogundele, R. Nuvern Applied Science Reviews Resilience and Vulnerabilities in Global Supply Chain Infrastructure: A Cybersecurity Risk Assessment. Nuvern Appl. Sci. Rev. 2024, 8, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  131. Hassan, M.F.A.; Ngah, A.H.; Tio, M.B.Y. Third-Party Logistics Intention to Provide Cold Transportation Services. The Mediating Effect of Top Management Support and Organizational Readiness in TOE Framework. OPSEARCH 2023, 60, 1603–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Pajić, V.; Andrejić, M.; Chatterjee, P. Enhancing Cold Chain Logistics: A Framework for Advanced Temperature Monitoring in Transportation and Storage. Mechatron. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2024, 3, 16–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Chukwu, O.A.; Adibe, M. Quality Assessment of Cold Chain Storage Facilities for Regulatory and Quality Management Compliance in a Developing Country Context. Int. J. Health Plan. Manag. 2022, 37, 930–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. De Bruin, S.; De Bruin, T.; Rosemann, P.M.; Freeze, R.; Kulkarni, P.U.; Carey, W.P. Understanding the Main Phases of Developing a Maturity Assessment Model. In Proceedings of the 6th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Sydney, Australia, 29 November–2 December 2005. [Google Scholar]
  135. Boyd, M.; Vaccari, L.; Posada, M.; Gattwinkel, D. An Application Programming Interface(API) Framework for Digital Government; European Commission, Joint Research Centre: Brussels, Belgium, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  136. Falkenberg, R.; Masoudinejad, M.; Buschhoff, M.; Venkatapathy, A.K.R.; Friesel, D.; Ten Hompel, M.; Spinczyk, O.; Wietfeld, C. PhyNetLab: An IoT-Based Warehouse Testbed. In Proceedings of the 2017 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, FedCSIS 2017, Prague, Czech Republic, 3–6 September 2017; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 1051–1055. [Google Scholar]
  137. Aljohani, A. Predictive Analytics and Machine Learning for Real-Time Supply Chain Risk Mitigation and Agility. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Zemanek, J.E., Jr.; Kros, J.F. Risk-Mitigation Strategies for Autonomous Delivery Vehicles in the Last Mile: A Comprehensive Overview of the Current State and Future Potential of Autonomous Delivery Technologies in the Supply Chain. J. Compr. Bus. Adm. Res. 2024, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Lawrence, J.M. Insights from the COVID-19 Pandemic on Building Resilience Capabilities in Vaccine Supply Chains Supporting Mass Vaccination. J. Humanit. Logist. Supply Chain. Manag. 2025, 15, 309–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Akram, H.W.; Akhtar, S.; Ahmad, A.; Anwar, I.; Sulaiman, M.A.B.A. Developing a Conceptual Framework Model for Effective Perishable Food Cold-Supply-Chain Management Based on Structured Literature Review. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. PRISMA framework.
Figure 1. PRISMA framework.
Sustainability 17 11202 g001
Figure 2. Chronological growth of publications. (Source: the authors’ analysis of Scopus records for the period 2009–2025).
Figure 2. Chronological growth of publications. (Source: the authors’ analysis of Scopus records for the period 2009–2025).
Sustainability 17 11202 g002
Figure 3. Predominant sources of publications. (Source: the authors’ analysis of Scopus records for the period 2009–2025).
Figure 3. Predominant sources of publications. (Source: the authors’ analysis of Scopus records for the period 2009–2025).
Sustainability 17 11202 g003
Figure 4. Top 10 influencing works. (Source: the authors’ analysis of Scopus records for the period 2009–2025) [14,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37].
Figure 4. Top 10 influencing works. (Source: the authors’ analysis of Scopus records for the period 2009–2025) [14,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37].
Sustainability 17 11202 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alherimi, N.; Ben-Daya, M. A Systematic Review on the Intersection of the Cold Chain and Digital Transformation. Sustainability 2025, 17, 11202. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172411202

AMA Style

Alherimi N, Ben-Daya M. A Systematic Review on the Intersection of the Cold Chain and Digital Transformation. Sustainability. 2025; 17(24):11202. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172411202

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alherimi, Nadin, and Mohamed Ben-Daya. 2025. "A Systematic Review on the Intersection of the Cold Chain and Digital Transformation" Sustainability 17, no. 24: 11202. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172411202

APA Style

Alherimi, N., & Ben-Daya, M. (2025). A Systematic Review on the Intersection of the Cold Chain and Digital Transformation. Sustainability, 17(24), 11202. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172411202

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop