Next Article in Journal
Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Full-Scale Vermifilter for Sewage Treatment: Effects of Seasonality and Sewage Parameters
Next Article in Special Issue
Safeguarding Gas Pipeline Sustainability: Deep Learning for Precision Identification of Gas Leakage Characteristics
Previous Article in Journal
Crisis Management During Pandemics: How to Promote Sustainability in Higher Education
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gas Extraction and Earthquakes in the Netherlands: Drawing Lessons from the Response to Ongoing Social Conflict and Tensions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Assessing Human Exposure to Fire Smoke in Underground Spaces: Challenges and Prospects for Protective Technologies

1
College of Safety Science and Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
2
School of Safety Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
3
School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(22), 9922; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17229922
Submission received: 10 October 2025 / Revised: 31 October 2025 / Accepted: 5 November 2025 / Published: 7 November 2025

Abstract

Urban underground spaces, including tunnels, subways, and underground commercial buildings, have grown quickly as urbanization has progressed. Fires frequently break out following industrial accidents and multi-hazard natural disasters, and they can severely damage human health. Fire smoke is a major contributor and a major hazard to public safety. The flow patterns of fire smoke in underground spaces, the risks to human casualties, and engineering and personal protective technologies are all thoroughly reviewed in this work. First, it analyzes the diffusion characteristics of fire smoke in underground spaces and summarizes the coupling effects between human behavior and smoke spread. Then, it examines the risks of casualties caused by toxic gases, particulate matter, and thermal effects in fire smoke from both macroscopic case studies and microscopic toxicological viewpoints. It summarizes engineering protection strategies, such as optimizing ventilation systems, intelligent monitoring and early warning systems, and advances in the application of new materials in personal respiratory protective equipment. Future studies should concentrate on interdisciplinary collaboration, creating more precise models of the interactions between people and fire smoke and putting life-cycle management of underground fires into practice. This review aims to provide theoretical and technical support for improving human safety in urban underground space fires, thereby promoting sustainable urban development.

1. Introduction

With the acceleration of urbanization, underground spaces have been increasingly developed and utilized as an important means to alleviate land resource constraints and expand urban functions, including subways, underground shopping malls, parking garages, tunnels, and utility tunnels. Underground spaces have become an indispensable component supporting sustainable, high-quality, and stable urban development [1]. However, in the aftermath of Multi-Hazard Natural Disasters and Industrial Accidents, fires often occur and may cause severe harm to human health. The unique environment of underground spaces also presents significant fire safety challenges [2]. Unlike above-ground buildings, underground spaces—due to their inherent enclosed nature, high occupant density, limited evacuation routes, and difficulties in rescue operations—pose far greater dangers and potential catastrophic consequences in the event of a fire. In recent years, the global number of fires and associated casualties has remained high [3].
In 1987, a fire on an escalator at King’s Cross St. Pancras station on the London Underground in the UK resulted in 31 fatalities. In 2000, a fire at the Dongdu Commercial Building in Luoyang, China, caused 309 deaths due to poisoning and suffocation, with 7 others injured. In 2022, a fire in an underground cold storage facility at the Xinchangxing Market in Dalian led to nine deaths. In 2024, a fire occurred on the underground floor of a street-level shop in Xinyu, resulting in 39 fatalities and 9 injuries. From January to October 2024, a total of 770,000 fires were reported in China, causing 1559 deaths and 2202 injuries, all showing an increase compared to the previous year. Table 1 summarizes some representative fire incidents in underground spaces and their severe consequences.
In underground spaces, there are multiple hazards from fire smoke. First, smoke obscures light, significantly reducing visibility and making it difficult for occupants to identify correct escape routes, thereby sharply decreasing evacuation efficiency and potentially triggering panic [4]. Second, smoke contains a large amount of toxic and harmful gases, directly threatening human life and safety. Finally, the heat carried by the smoke can cause burns or respiratory tract scalds. Thermal radiation from flames, hypoxia, and fire smoke are the three primary sources of fire hazards, with respiratory system damage caused by inhaling fire smoke being a leading cause of fatalities [5]. Statistics from the U.S. National Fire Protection Association indicate that deaths due to inhalation of fire smoke account for 60–75% of all fire-related fatalities [6]. When individuals inhale fire smoke particles through the nasal and oral cavities, these particles deposit on respiratory surfaces, enter the lungs, and may even enter the bloodstream, leading to increasing incidence and mortality rates of respiratory diseases, cardiovascular diseases, and lung cancer. Therefore, studying the exposure interaction characteristics between occupants and smoke in underground fire scenarios is of great practical importance. The findings can contribute to developing engineering and personal protection technologies. This work is crucial for ensuring underground space safety and formulating emergency plans. After a fire occurs in an underground space, most occupants will choose to evacuate. During evacuation in such environments, people need to overcome gravity to move upward, which is generally more complex and strenuous than evacuating downward from a high-rise building [7,8]. Furthermore, extensive human movement occurs during escape, which can influence the interaction characteristics between fire smoke and the immediate smoke environment around individuals, as well as alter the exposure levels and injury risks associated with inhaled fire smoke.
This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of research progress in this field, with the main content covering the smoke movement patterns in underground spaces, the interaction between smoke and dynamic occupants, exposure characteristics and injury mechanisms of the human respiratory system, and advances in engineering and individual protection technologies for underground space fire scenarios. It will elaborate on the exposure risks and injury mechanisms of smoke to humans through both macro-level typical fire case analysis and micro-level research on respiratory system injury mechanisms. This review adopts a structured narrative approach to synthesize the diverse and conceptually broad literature in the field. The literature search was performed using core academic databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar, with keywords such as “underground fire smoke,” “human exposure risk,” “evacuation simulation,” and “smoke control”. The selection of publications was guided by explicit criteria, prioritizing seminal works, high-impact studies, and recent advancements pertinent to the core themes of smoke dynamics, human risk assessment, and protective technologies for fire smoke exposure in urban underground spaces. It will discuss the current state of smoke protection technologies in underground space fires, including advanced engineering protection systems and novel personal protective equipment, and provide an outlook on future development trends. It is to offer robust theoretical support and technical references for the safety design, emergency management, and technological innovation of underground spaces.

2. Smoke Diffusion Patterns in Underground Space Fires

In underground space fires, combustion characteristics and smoke movement patterns differ significantly from those in above-ground environments. Moreover, underground spaces are densely populated, and in the event of a fire, the evacuation path for personnel is long and may intersect with smoke diffusion routes. Complex smoke diffusion patterns will further threaten personnel safety. This is also the reason why most fatal fire accidents are caused by smoke. Therefore, the process of smoke spread in underground space fires deserves special attention.
Smoke spread is influenced by the complex coupling of spatial structure, ventilation systems, and dynamic human behavior [9,10,11]. The enclosed nature of underground spaces is a critical factor in the rapid spread of fire smoke. After a fire ignites, high-temperature smoke, due to its lower density, rises rapidly and forms a stable smoke layer beneath the ceiling or roof, spreading quickly horizontally. When smoke encounters vertical channels such as stairwells or shafts, it accelerates its spread to upper levels due to the “stack effect,” posing a lethal threat to occupants on higher floors. Over the past few decades, researchers domestically and internationally have conducted a series of studies focusing on typical underground space scenarios, providing important references for establishing more accurate models of fire smoke diffusion [12]. The King’s Cross St. Pancras station fire on the London Underground serves as a typical case study. In 1987, a fire originating at the base of a wooden escalator was channeled and accelerated within the enclosed escalator incline, creating a distinct “trench effect.” This ultimately led to a flashover, projecting flames and dense smoke into the ticket hall above, resulting in 31 fatalities. This incident highlights the amplifying effect that narrow, elongated passages in underground spaces can have on smoke spread.
Focusing on representative scenarios such as subways and tunnels, scholars have conducted research on the smoke diffusion characteristics of fires within these environments. Key aspects investigated include temperature distribution beneath the ceiling, smoke stratification behavior, and smoke overflow patterns. Regarding maximum temperature, previous researchers revised classical predictive models for maximum smoke temperature, as shown in Table 2. By comparing and analyzing these models, it can be concluded that the maximum smoke temperature is directly related to the fire source power and the ceiling height, but its correlation coefficient is influenced by factors such as sidewall limitations, opening conditions, fire source location, and wind speed conditions. Therefore, for specific fire scenarios, the prediction model for maximum smoke temperature can be improved by incorporating key considerations based on Alpert’s modeling approach [13]. Furthermore, the influence of factors such as structural dimensions, fire source location, top vents, and blockage conditions has been analyzed, leading to further refinements of temperature prediction models [14,15,16,17]. In terms of temperature decay, Delichatsios [18] proposed a model for the temperature distribution of smoke flow along ceiling beams. He et al. [19] developed an exponential decay model for smoke temperature in corridor fire scenarios. Hu et al. [20] and Fan et al. [21] conducted theoretical analyses of fire smoke spread in long and narrow spaces, establishing exponential temperature distribution functions and lateral temperature distribution models based on full-scale experimental data. The influence of the slope of the main tunnels and connecting tunnels on longitudinal temperature distribution has been studied [22]. The effects of blockages and slope on longitudinal temperature distribution have also been analyzed [23]. Scholars have additionally considered the impact of structural materials, smoke barriers, ambient pressure, and ventilation and smoke extraction on temperature distribution [24,25,26,27,28]. It is noted that the structures involved in the aforementioned studies on fire smoke temperature distribution are primarily narrow spaces, where the temperature along the longitudinal centerline can be considered representative. However, Long et al. [29] found that in underground spaces with relatively small aspect ratios, such as double-island subway stations, the smoke temperature distribution beneath the ceiling cannot be simply represented by the temperature along the central longitudinal axis. Similarly, it is necessary to consider more refined scenarios, describe temperature distribution based on a universal model, and modify the model by obtaining a large amount of experimental and testing data to allow for its practical applicability.
The stratification state of fire smoke is a crucial indicator for assessing fire safety [34,35,36]. Smoke stratification characteristics are governed by the combined effects of thermal buoyancy and inertial forces, so the Froude number (Fr) and Richardson number (Ri) are frequently used to analyze the stability of smoke stratification in tunnels and other underground space fires [37,38]. A “stratification velocity” theory and critical Froude number have been established, and the coupling effect between longitudinal airflow and upstream blockage near the fire source has been analyzed [39]. Research indicates that obstacles can disrupt smoke stratification, but a stable smoke layer can still be maintained under appropriate longitudinal ventilation velocities. Numerous other factors significantly influencing thermal stratification have also been considered, including the vent location, ceiling extraction, outdoor wind, and water sprays [40,41,42,43,44]. Calculation methods for smoke layer height under different structural scenarios have been proposed. These include a semi-empirical model for estimating smoke layer thickness under unconfined ceilings under steady-state conditions [45], and models accounting for the influence of tunnel height, tunnel length, and ventilation velocity on smoke layer height distribution [46,47,48,49]. Long et al. [50] proposed a calculation model for smoke layer height in subway station fires under natural ventilation conditions.
After understanding the smoke diffusion pattern in the space of the floor where the fire is located, it is necessary to further analyze the diffusion mode of smoke to the upper layer caused by the chimney effect. At this time, the smoke overflow is a significant phenomenon, which needs to be emphasized as the connection point for smoke transmission in the upper and lower spaces. For this issue, scholars have conducted analytical studies on smoke overflow characteristics under various scenarios [51,52]. In subway station fires, smoke primarily spreads upward through stairways and escalators, forming vertical opening overflow at stairwell openings. Reynolds [53] analyzed mass and energy changes between the upper and lower spaces connected by stairs using dimensionless parameters. Ergin-Ozkan et al. [54] investigated the influence of opening size on airflow within stairwells. Chen et al. [55,56] analyzed the structural characteristics of the airflow field at critical stairwell openings, explored the normal distribution characteristics of airflow velocity, and employed the virtual fire source method to predict critical states. They also characterized temperature distributions above and behind obstacles and in the vertical direction, quantifying the impact of obstacles on subway station fire safety design.
In summary, scholars have conducted extensive theoretical analyses, full-scale experiments, scaled model tests, and numerical simulations focusing on the fire smoke diffusion characteristics in typical underground spaces such as tunnels, subways, and commercial buildings, yielding substantial research outcomes. These studies, considering fire incidents in scenarios like subways and tunnels, have investigated the influence of factors including ventilation conditions, fire intensity, source location, and material properties on fire smoke diffusion patterns. They have established classical models for ceiling temperature distribution and introduced modifications to these models accounting for factors such as building structure, obstructions, slope, and ventilation conditions. The characteristics of smoke stratification and the smoke overflow patterns in different scenarios have also been analyzed. These research efforts collectively enrich the theoretical understanding of fire smoke diffusion in underground spaces, and provide a fundamental reference for accurately assessing human exposure and injury processes within fire smoke environments.

3. Human Exposure Risk Assessments in Underground Space Fires

3.1. Risk Factors for Human Casualties in Underground Space Fire Cases

Casualty statistics from underground fire accidents reveal the prevalence of smoke inhalation as a cause of death. Integrating macroscopic fire case analyses with microscopic toxicological studies enables a comprehensive understanding of the lethality of smoke and its associated risks to humans. For instance, the 1987 King’s Cross London Underground fire resulted in 31 fatalities, the 1995 Baku Metro fire caused 289 deaths, and the 2003 Daegu subway fire in South Korea led to 198 fatalities, many of whom succumbed to asphyxiation from inhaling toxic smoke. In these disasters, smoke was a common dominant factor in the mass casualties. Furthermore, post-disaster analyses indicate that, beyond the fire itself, a series of design and management deficiencies exacerbated the hazards posed by smoke. After the fire erupted, the power system automatically shut down, plunging the station into darkness as emergency lighting and exit signs failed to operate, leaving passengers to grope for escape routes in the dark. More critically, train doors failed to open due to the power outage, trapping numerous passengers inside the carriages. The station’s ventilation system also proved severely inadequate in capacity, unable to exhaust the massive amounts of thick smoke in a timely manner. This allowed toxic smoke to rapidly spread and even travel through ventilation ducts to connected underground shopping areas at the surface level. Consequently, many victims were not burned to death but were asphyxiated by toxic smoke after escaping the trains but failing to find exits. Additionally, the corners in pedestrian passages may further impede crowd evacuation efficiency [57]. In summary, these accidents exposed multiple systemic failures: malfunctioning emergency systems (power outage triggered by the fire caused critical emergency lighting and guidance systems to fail), obstructed evacuation (train doors failed to open, trapping passengers), and ventilation system defects (inadequate smoke exhaust capacity, and even facilitation of smoke spread to other areas). This section examines key methodological shifts, beginning with foundational computational models, progressing to techniques designed to handle data ambiguity, and culminating in dynamic frameworks capable of simulating real-time accident evolution. The chosen methods’ crucial contribution to the development of the field’s analytical capacities is examined.
Scholars have developed risk assessment models for fire evacuation scenarios to quantify these risks and consider various failure factors as comprehensively as possible [58]. Furthermore, by integrating computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation and the Dijkstra algorithm, these approaches quantify individuals’ inhalation exposure risk to toxic gases, thereby enabling evacuation route optimization. Related methods have been adapted and improved for application in fire smoke scenarios [59,60]. Yuan et al. [61] proposed a method integrating Event Tree Analysis (ETA), CFD simulation, and evacuation modeling for risk assessment in toxic gas leakage accidents, wherein dynamic evacuation is determined based on a cellular automata (CA) model. Their study analyzed the synergy between technical safety barriers and emergency evacuation, exploring its effectiveness in reducing fatality risks. Si et al. [62] investigated the diffusion patterns of large amounts of toxic and harmful smoke in a mine network during coal mine roadway fires. They found that the resistance of high-temperature airflow correlates with the ventilation resistance of the roadway under normal airflow conditions and is proportional to the airflow temperature. This finding provides a basis for selecting emergency evacuation zones and implementing safety measures.
As mentioned, underground spaces possess inherent limitations, such as inadequate natural lighting and poor ventilation, which can easily induce panic among evacuees during a fire incident [63]. Escape routes are typically confined to limited staircases and evacuation passages, and these narrow exits further increase the difficulty of escape. Moreover, underground spaces often accumulate substantial combustible materials. Once a fire occurs, flames can spread rapidly, while smoke spreads along the same direction as evacuating occupants. Compared to above-ground spaces and other types of underground environments, occupant evacuation and emergency rescue operations in underground spaces are considerably more challenging. Therefore, to prevent fire accidents in underground spaces and reduce casualty risks, it is essential to conduct a comprehensive risk analysis of fire-related casualties and quantify both the fire risks and their potential consequences.
The lack of detailed data and uncertainties are primary factors limiting the effectiveness and accuracy of traditional risk assessment methods. With the popularization and application of fuzzy set theory, traditional risk assessment methods have been significantly expanded and improved. Masalegooyan et al. [64] proposed an integrated framework using fuzzy fault tree analysis to assess the probability of major fire risks in landfills. Kong et al. [65] used ETA and fuzzy numbers to characterize the uncertainty regarding fire risk and analyzed potential fire scenarios caused by fire protection system failures. Fuzzy set theory has adapted traditional risk assessment methods to diverse risk assessment needs; however, the structure of these studies is static and incapable of deductive reasoning. Furthermore, many studies failed to represent conditional dependencies between variables. Bayesian Networks (BN) provide a tool to address the aforementioned issues [66,67,68]. Yuan et al. [69] proposed a fire risk assessment method for underground engineering, enabling comprehensive analysis of causes, occurrences, hazards, and other information. Chen et al. [70] established a dynamic risk assessment model for cotton warehouse fires through fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, case analysis, and BN. Wu et al. [71] studied the evolution of subway station fire incidents, finding that complex structures, high passenger flow, peak hours, and fires inside trains could lead to severe economic losses and casualties. These studies provide new perspectives for fire risk assessment in underground spaces and have driven continuous progress.
Recently, research on fire risk assessment for underground buildings has gradually increased, paying more attention to the safety and evacuation of occupants during a fire [72,73,74,75]. However, most studies lack in-depth analysis of fire risk factors from the perspective of actual fire accidents, and the related risk factors often struggle to be comprehensive and complete. Fire is a dynamic and complex process, and the assessment of casualty risk requires comprehensive consideration of the interactions among multiple links, such as fire ignition, emergency response, and occupant evacuation. Fu et al. [58] addressed the challenges faced by underground commercial buildings in fire safety management, constructing a fire casualty risk assessment model combining fuzzy FTA and BN, aiming to quantitatively analyze the dynamic risk of casualties caused by fires in underground commercial buildings. This model comprises accidental fire ignition, uncontrolled fire development, and failed evacuation. It can comprehensively identify risk factors, reflect the impact of different emergency actions on accident evolution, and aid in selecting the optimal emergency response plan. These models can guide the formulation of fire prevention and control strategies and emergency response efforts for underground spaces, providing an innovative tool for enhancing the safety of underground spaces and reducing fire accidents and casualties.

3.2. Interaction Characteristics Between Human Respiratory and Fire Smoke

Fire smoke is the primary factor causing casualties in underground space fires. From a microscopic perspective, fire smoke composition is complex, and its toxicity varies depending on the burning materials and combustion efficiency. Fire smoke primarily consists of a large volume of air heated by the flame and high-temperature vapors released from burning materials (hot air), toxic gases, and smoke, comprising decomposed and condensed unburned substances. Hence, its injury mechanisms can be primarily categorized into three types: thermal damage, toxic damage, and particle-induced obstruction damage (Figure 1). The main and most lethal toxic component in smoke is carbon monoxide (CO). Its affinity for hemoglobin molecules is far greater than that of oxygen, allowing it to rapidly displace oxygen, leading to acute carbon monoxide poisoning and tissue hypoxia. Furthermore, smoke contains irritant gases such as sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), which can cause severe irritation to the eyes and respiratory tract. Particulate matter (PM) in fire smoke, especially fine particulate matter with a diameter of less than 2.5 μm (PM2.5), can easily bypass the upper respiratory tract and deposit deep within the lungs, even entering the bloodstream. PM2.5 may also adsorb carcinogens such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Inhalation of significant amounts of PM2.5 can trigger systemic inflammation, exacerbate cardio-pulmonary diseases, and significantly increase mortality risk [5].
Investigating the injury mechanisms of heat and smoke particles on the human respiratory tract and analyzing the resultant damage are essential for accurate risk assessment and targeted protection research, representing a forefront challenge in urban public security [76]. Farahmand, Goodarzi, and Phuong [77,78,79] have conducted research on the injury mechanisms of the human respiratory tract exposed to fire environments. Their work has preliminarily elucidated fundamental relationships, such as the characteristics of damage in different regions of the human respiratory tract caused by inhaling fire smoke at varying temperatures, and the correlation between exposure duration and casualty risk. A consensus is emerging that by monitoring the flow velocity and deposition of particles in various regions of a simulated human respiratory system model under different respiratory flow rates, the impact of fire smoke on the respiratory system can be quantified, thereby revealing the injury mechanisms. The transport of two major fire smoke hazard components (heat and smoke particles) within the human respiratory tract has been investigated by Weng et al. [80,81,82,83]. They have obtained data on the temperature field and the distribution patterns of smoke particle deposition within the respiratory tract, and established models for heat transfer and smoke particle transport and deposition in fire smoke environments. Xu et al. [83] establish a set of three-dimensional realistic respiratory tract models considering gender, age, and occupation, providing a foundational resource for studying the transport laws of fire smoke in the human respiratory tract. Utilizing Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) technology, they revealed the distribution patterns of airflow fields within the respiratory tract models, precisely measuring the characteristics of airflow movement in the tracheal region during both inhalation and exhalation states. Cui et al. and Li et al. have also employed CFD methods to solve for the flow field changes within the respiratory tract [84,85,86,87]. They analyzed the influence of breathing state, intensity, and pattern on the distribution of the flow field within the respiratory tract, providing foundational support based on transport laws of flow fields for accurately predicting fire smoke injury mechanisms and assessing the degree of damage. Xu et al. [80] established a respiratory tract heat transfer model that considers characteristics such as convective heat transfer, evaporative heat transfer, and the physiological response of human tissues. They determined the distribution patterns of the temperature field within the realistic human respiratory tract [81], systematically studying the mechanisms of thermal damage therein. Furthermore, they analyzed the influence of physical size and density of smoke particles in typical fire scenarios, along with breathing parameters, on their transport and deposition behavior, obtaining the deposition distribution patterns of smoke particles in local regions of the respiratory tract [82]. Then, they established precise assessment methods and procedures for evaluating thermal damage, particle-induced obstruction, and toxic damage in local regions of the respiratory tract. These included analyzing the risk levels of thermal burns, inhaled particle dosage, and the carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks from toxic particles in the human respiratory tract under fire smoke scenarios. These works provide methodological support for assessing the safety and health of trapped individuals and rescue personnel in fire smoke environments, offer foundational models for medical personnel in diagnosing and treating respiratory tract injuries, and provide a scientific basis for developing respiratory protective equipment and evaluating its performance in fires.
In addition to analyzing the transport patterns of smoke particles within the human respiratory tract, it is also crucial to consider the interaction characteristics between fire smoke and evacuating occupants in the environment. In underground space fire scenarios, the evacuation behavior of occupants and the spread of smoke form a complex, coupled process with both factors influencing each other [88,89]. Smoke first exerts direct physiological and psychological impacts on occupants. Dense smoke obscures visibility, preventing individuals from identifying correct escape routes and often causing them to blindly head towards seemingly brighter but potentially more dangerous areas due to “phototaxis.” Studies have shown that judgment and movement speed significantly decrease in smoke-filled environments, directly affecting evacuation efficiency. Furthermore, the dynamic evacuation behavior of occupants can, in turn, influence smoke movement and personal exposure. Activities such as walking generate wake flows [90,91]. These movement-induced airflows disturb the local flow field and enhance the dispersion of particulate matter [92]. Although these studies primarily focus on pollutants at ambient temperature, the underlying physical mechanisms they reveal are also applicable to fire smoke. The movement of multiple individuals may increase the inhalation exposure risk for others through airflow mixing effects [93]. In summary, the collective findings from these studies suggest that quantifying exposure risk in fire smoke environments must incorporate the movement behaviors of occupants. However, a significant gap remains in accurately describing the interaction characteristics between the movement of personnel and fire smoke.
Scholars have investigated the impact of human activities such as walking, and limb and torso movements on the dispersion of pollutants. However, these studies have primarily focused on ambient-temperature inhalable particles, volatile organic compounds, and infectious disease droplets [94,95,96], with relatively few addressing fire smoke specifically. Han et al. indicated that the movement of personnel creates thermal convection effects with high-temperature toxic gases, significantly altering the distribution of hazards within risk zones by promoting mixing between gases of different temperatures [97]. Luo et al., studying air pollution from wildfires in California, USA, investigated the impact of activities like walking and window-opening on individual respiratory exposure, demonstrating that human activity can lead to increased particulate matter concentrations in the breathing zone [98]. Benabed et al. found that airflows generated by human movement can cause particles previously settled on floors and object surfaces to become resuspended, entering the human breathing zone [99,100]. Wu et al. further demonstrated that occupant movement can significantly alter an individual’s transient inhalation exposure and increase the respiratory exposure risk for others in the environment, an effect that is more pronounced in multi-occupant movement scenarios [101,102]. These results highlight the necessity of considering the influence of human behaviors when quantifying their exposure and injury in underground fire.
Typical human postures and movement behaviors involved in fire smoke evacuation scenarios primarily include running, upright walking, crouching/walking bent forward, and crawling. It is noted that changes in an individual’s position directly affect their instantaneous inhalation exposure characteristics. Airflows induced by movement can also alter the inhalation patterns for smoke particles of different sizes. Furthermore, the psychological stress commonly experienced during evacuation can lead to an increased breathing rate, thereby elevating exposure risks. Therefore, it is essential to investigate the interaction dynamics between evacuating individuals and fire smoke under various conditions, including different movement postures and activity intensities. Building on this, integrating the positional data of evacuees with the patterns of smoke spread (as disturbed by movement) and the spatiotemporal distribution of smoke concentration is crucial for accurately assessing respiratory system exposure and injury risks among individuals evacuating through fire smoke environments. This integrated approach will subsequently inform the optimization of evacuation strategies and the improvement of protective equipment.
In summary, macroscopic fire case studies and microscopic scientific research form a complete causal chain. The macroscopic cases reveal that smoke asphyxiation is the primary cause of fatalities, while microscopic studies, through component analysis and CFD simulations, explain at the particle level how fire smoke specifically causes damage to the human respiratory system. These two approaches, from different scales, confirm the lethality of smoke, creating a closed loop between theory and practice. The complexity of fire smoke composition in underground spaces poses severe challenges to protection technologies. For instance, with the recent development of new energy sources, fires related to such incidents have also become increasingly common [103,104]. The wide variety of toxic substances in smoke, which constantly change with combustion conditions, requires protective equipment to possess broad-spectrum protective capabilities, rather than being targeted only at a single harmful gas. This complexity drives the advancement of protection technology from simple filtration or isolation towards multi-functional and composite development.
In conclusion, researching the mechanisms of respiratory system exposure and injury in fire smoke environments holds significant practical importance. It is essential to consider the interaction characteristics between typical human movements, such as evacuation and rescue operations, and fire smoke, quantify the patterns of human smoke inhalation, and subsequently establish methods for assessing personnel risks in fire smoke scenarios. This will enable accurate assessment of human respiratory exposure risks and provide fundamental references for the development of protective equipment and the formulation of evacuation strategies.

4. Fire Smoke Protective Technologies

The protection system for underground space fires is an integrated framework comprising engineering protection technologies, emergency evacuation strategies, and personal protective equipment, and its development is advancing towards greater intelligence and precision [105,106]. In underground fire smoke control, it is generally necessary to apply air pressure to confine the smoke to specific areas and reduce its spread. The minimum required air velocity or air volume that just satisfies these control conditions is defined as the critical ventilation velocity or critical air volume [107,108,109]. For different underground space structures and fire scenarios, studying appropriate ventilation modes is essential for effective smoke control.
Longitudinal ventilation remains the dominant strategy for tunnel fires; its primary mechanics involve creating a critical velocity to prevent smoke back-layering. The relationship between critical velocity and factors like heat release rate has been extensively modeled, with key studies proposing dimensionless correlations such as critical velocity [110,111,112]. However, the presence of a train blockage introduces a complex perturbation to this flow, effectively reducing the cross-sectional area and increasing the required critical velocity depending on blockage ratio [113]. This necessitates design adjustments that go beyond standard formulas, incorporating Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations to account for such real-world obstructions. The influence of ambient pressure has also been studied, revealing that as ambient pressure decreases, the reduced inertial force leads to an increase in smoke back-layering length [114]. Furthermore, factors such as the cross-sectional shape [115,116], slope [117,118,119], fire source location [120], and shaft ventilation [121,122] have been investigated.
For fires in multi-level underground structures, the primary objective is to confine the smoke to the fire-originating floor and prevent its diffusion to upper levels [123,124]. The operational mode of ventilation and smoke extraction during a fire is another critical engineering technique for fire smoke control requiring in-depth study. Subway stations are typically equipped with ventilation and smoke exhaust systems. Under normal circumstances, these systems operate in air supply and return modes, functioning to introduce fresh air and regulate the ambient temperature in public areas. During a fire, the air supply and return systems in the affected area must be switched to a smoke exhaust mode, ensuring the timely extraction of fire smoke and safeguarding the safe evacuation of occupants. When evaluating ventilation performance, factors such as vent locations, fan operation timing, air curtains, and piston effects are also considered [125,126,127].
Beyond traditional ventilation and smoke exhaust engineering design, a new generation of fire monitoring systems is enabling a shift from passive response to active prediction through artificial intelligence technologies. These systems integrate various sensors such as fire signal detectors and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras, utilizing multi-source information fusion to enhance the accuracy of fire situation identification [128,129,130]. The core of these intelligent systems lies in specific machine learning architectures. For instance, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are increasingly applied to process video feeds from CCD cameras for early flame and smoke visual recognition, while Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks are used to analyze temporal data from gas and temperature sensors for predicting fire development trends. This represents a clear integration of computer vision and environmental sensing—an interdisciplinary fusion that allows for faster and more reliable fire detection compared to single-source systems. Unlike traditional systems that rely on fixed thresholds, intelligent systems can continuously refine their decision rules through self-learning algorithms. Some intelligent early warning devices employ fuzzy neural networks and nonlinear fire models to predict the severity and development trends of fire situations and can automatically integrate with firefighting systems to achieve precise rescue operations.
Ventilation systems remain crucial for fire smoke control in underground spaces. However, future ventilation systems should be driven by artificial intelligence and big data, possessing significantly enhanced adaptive capabilities. The use of artificial intelligence and machine learning can further extend to tasks such as real-time occupant tracking and the adaptive, dynamic control of ventilation systems. Meanwhile, the application of digital twin technology enables the creation of dynamic, real-time fire scenario simulations, which holds significant potential for optimizing both ventilation strategies and evacuation management. Intelligent algorithms can dynamically optimize ventilation strategies based on real-time environmental data—such as temperature and smoke concentration—coupled with fire simulation data, enabling rapid response and highly efficient smoke extraction [131]. Such systems effectively mitigate the negative impacts associated with traditional ventilation strategies. By dividing the underground space into independent smoke compartments, the intelligent system can activate exhaust vents only within the compartment affected by fire, thereby concentrating efforts on smoke removal and creating favorable conditions for occupant evacuation and rescue operations.
Beyond engineering systems, personal protective equipment (PPE) serves as the last line of defense for self-rescue and mutual aid in fire scenarios [132,133]. Filtering self-rescue respiratory protective devices are crucial tools for fire escape. Their core principle involves processing inhaled air through a filtration unit that utilizes adsorption, absorption, catalysis, and direct filtration mechanisms to remove carbon monoxide, hydrogen cyanide, toxic smoke, and hazardous particulates from the smoke, thereby providing breathable air [134]. National standards, such as GB/T 38451-2019 [135], establish strict technical requirements for PPE, including minimum protection times against various harmful gases like carbon monoxide and specifications for breathing resistance. Innovations in materials science represent a key breakthrough for enhancing the performance of personal protection. Traditional filter media face limitations when confronting high temperatures and complex smoke compositions. Nanofiber filter media show promising application potential. Characterized by extremely small fiber interstices, nanofiber media can maintain high filtration precision while reducing breathing resistance [136,137]. Research indicates that nanofiber membranes fabricated via electrospinning technology can effectively filter fine particulate matter, bacteria, and viruses from the air, offering the advantages of high filtration efficiency and a low pressure drop. Certain nanofiber materials can even be functionalized to remove specific gases, showing potential for broad-spectrum protection. Some researchers have developed novel heat-resistant “sponge ceramics” that are ultra-lightweight, heat-tolerant, and compressible, showing promise for applications in firefighting garments and smoke filtration. Unlike the brittleness of traditional ceramics, these sponge ceramics can withstand high temperatures while maintaining elasticity, offering a new solution for respiratory protection in high-heat environments. Furthermore, artificial intelligence is transforming the research and development paradigm for new materials used in PPE [138]. Researchers can leverage AI simulation systems to rapidly identify optimal solutions from vast arrays of material formulations, significantly shortening R&D cycles and accelerating the transition of new protective materials from the laboratory to practical application.
Overall, human protection in fire smoke scenarios within underground spaces is a systematic endeavor, and its future development will focus on multi-disciplinary technology integration, intelligent systems, and full life-cycle safety management. One such development is interdisciplinary research integration. Future fire safety in underground spaces will be the product of deep integration across multiple disciplines, including fluid dynamics, thermodynamics, materials science, and computer science. This entails more accurately incorporating human psychology and behavior into fire evacuation models, and investigating the complex micro-scale coupling between human movement-induced airflows and fire smoke, thereby enabling the more precise assessment of occupant exposure risks. Second is the further application of intelligent technologies. The Internet of Things, big data, and artificial intelligence will comprehensively empower underground space fire protection systems, facilitating a shift from passive response to active prediction, and from imprecise rescue to precise rescue. For instance, AI algorithm-based dynamic path planning methods can utilize real-time data (like temperature and carbon monoxide levels) extracted from fire simulation software to dynamically determine optimal evacuation routes and maximum allowable escape times. This technology should be deeply integrated with intelligent ventilation systems and personal protective equipment, forming a real-time responsive, self-optimizing intelligent emergency network. Furthermore, continuous innovation in new protection technologies is crucial. Materials science still holds immense potential for innovation in the field of personal protective equipment. Future research should develop multifunctional composite filter media capable of simultaneously filtering particulate matter and adsorbing toxic gases, enhancing the durability and reliability of protective equipment under extreme high temperatures, and leveraging AI-assisted design to accelerate the commercial application of a new generation of protective equipment. Through these methods, fire safety in underground spaces will advance to a higher level, providing a solid guarantee for the sustainable development of cities.

5. Conclusions

This paper offers a systematic review of the smoke movement patterns, related casualty risk characteristics, and recent developments in engineering protection technologies and personal protective equipment in underground spaces fires. This review attempts to provide theoretical and technical assistance for improving human safety in fire scenarios and promote sustainable urban development.
(1) Considerable research efforts have been devoted to comprehending fire smoke diffusion characteristics, smoke control theory, and coordinated smoke management strategies in common underground spaces such as subways and tunnels. This research includes a theoretical analysis, experimental studies, and numerical simulations. The impact of variables like ventilation, fire intensity, source location, and material characteristics on smoke dispersion patterns has been methodically examined. Building structure, obstacles, slope, and ventilation conditions are some of the important characteristics that have been incorporated into classical models for ceiling temperature distribution. Smoke stratification behavior and overflow patterns in various scenarios have been thoroughly analyzed.
(2) Respiratory system injury caused by inhaling fire smoke constitutes a primary cause of fire-related fatalities. This review analyzes the risks posed by toxic gases, particulate matter, and thermal effects in fire smoke from both macroscopic case study and microscopic toxicological perspectives, forming a closed loop connecting practical observation with theoretical mechanisms. Future research needs to focus on the dynamic interactions between characteristic human movements and fire smoke, quantify the patterns of human inhalation, and establish precise personnel risk assessment methodologies to enable accurate risk prevention and control.
(3) Human protection in underground space fire scenarios is a systematic endeavor, the future development of which should concentrate on multi-disciplinary technology integration, intelligent system application, and full life-cycle safety management. Advancing accurate models of human–fire–smoke interaction through interdisciplinary research and leveraging AI for holistic fire management are crucial. Simultaneously, the application of intelligent technologies must be deepened to optimize ventilation and enhance monitoring and early-warning systems. Specific breakthroughs in new material development for advanced personal protective equipment and the implementation of intelligent, adaptive evacuation systems represent critical technological paths for future research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.W. (Jialin Wu) and Z.L.; methodology, J.W. (Jialin Wu), M.L., and Y.T. (Yongqi Tang); validation, J.W. (Jinghong Wang), Y.T. (Yunting Tsai), and Y.Y.; formal analysis, Z.L.; investigation, J.W. (Jialin Wu), M.L., and Y.T. (Yongqi Tang); resources, Z.L.; data curation, J.W. (Jialin Wu), Y.X., F.H., and Z.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.W. (Jialin Wu), M.L., Y.T. (Yongqi Tang), Y.X., and F.H.; writing—review and editing, J.W. (Jinghong Wang), Y.T. (Yunting Tsai), Y.Y., and Z.L.; visualization, J.W. (Jialin Wu); supervision, Z.L.; project administration, J.W. (Jialin Wu) and Z.L.; funding acquisition, J.W. (Jialin Wu), Z.L., and J.W. (Jinghong Wang). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Key R&D Program of China (NO. 2024YFC3014703), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (NO. 8254046), National Natural Science Foundations of China (No.52374208), Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province (No. 2024CXPT064), and Opening Fund of State Key Laboratory of Fire Science (SKLFS) under Grant No. HZ2025-KF06.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Liu, S.-C.; Peng, F.-L.; Qiao, Y.-K.; Dong, Y.-H. Quantitative Evaluation of the Contribution of Underground Space to Urban Resilience: A Case Study in China. Undergr. Space 2024, 17, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lattimer, B.Y.; McKinnon, M. A Review of Fire Growth and Fully Developed Fires in Railcars. Fire Mater. 2018, 42, 603–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, X.; Chang, C.-T.; Zhu, Y.-Y.; Li, L.-L. Key Influence Factors on the Evacuation Route Selection for Fire Emergencies in Urban Underground Complexes. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2023, 31, 2630–2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wei, J.; Deng, Q.; Zhang, L. Study on Emergency Evacuation in Underground Urban Complexes. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0278521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Weng, W.; Yang, J.; Wu, J.; Fu, M.; He, Z.; Chen, W. Human Thermoregulation and Injury Evaluation in Fire Environments: A Review. Fire Technol. 2024, 60, 991–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hurley, M.J.; Gottuk, D.; Hall, J.R.; Harada, K.; Kuligowski, E.; Puchovsky, M.; Torero, J.; Watts, J.M.; Wieczorek, C. (Eds.) SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016; ISBN 978-1-4939-2564-3. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cui, C.; Shao, Q.; Liu, Y.; Han, G.; Liu, F.; Han, X. A Review of the Evolution and Trends in Research on the Emergency Evacuation of Urban Underground Spaces. Buildings 2023, 13, 1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Li, Q.; Wu, J.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, J. Optimization of Emergency Shelter Layout with Consideration of Toxic Gas Leakage Based on a Cell Transmission Model. Saf. Sci. 2025, 185, 106810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Guo, Y.; Xiao, G.; Chen, J.; Xiong, X.; Deng, H.; Liu, X.; Wang, L.; Li, Y. Characterizing Burning Behaviour of Convection-Controlled Pool Fires at Sub-Atmospheric Pressure by Stagnation Theory. Energy 2024, 287, 129689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, J.; Zhang, R.; Wang, Y.; Shi, L.; Zhang, S.; Liu, J. Experimental Study on Combustion Characteristics of Pool Fires in a Sealed Environment. Energy 2023, 283, 128497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Luan, D.; Chu, T.; Bielawski, J.; Fan, C.; Węgrzyński, W.; Huang, X. Smoke Movement and Stratification of Tunnel Fires under Coupled Effects of Rainfall and Ventilation. Fire Saf. J. 2025, 152, 104323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, K.; Cai, W.; Zhang, Y.; Hao, H.; Wang, Z. Numerical Simulation of Fire Smoke Control Methods in Subway Stations and Collaborative Control System for Emergency Rescue. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2021, 147, 146–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Alpert, R.L. Calculation of Response Time of Ceiling-Mounted Fire Detectors. Fire Technol. 1972, 8, 181–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cong, W.; Shi, L.; Shi, Z.; Peng, M.; Yang, H.; Zhang, S.; Cheng, X. Effect of Train Fire Location on Maximum Smoke Temperature beneath the Subway Tunnel Ceiling. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2020, 97, 103282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, Y.F.; Li, Y.L.; Yan, P.N.; Zhang, B.; Jiang, J.C.; Zhang, L. Maximum Temperature of Smoke beneath Ceiling in Tunnel Fire with Vertical Shafts. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2015, 50, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tang, F.; Mei, F.Z.; Wang, Q.; He, Z.; Fan, C.G.; Tao, C.F. Maximum Temperature beneath the Ceiling in Tunnel Fires with Combination of Ceiling Mechanical Smoke Extraction and Longitudinal Ventilation. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2017, 68, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huang, Y.; Li, Y.; Dong, B.; Li, J.; Liang, Q. Numerical Investigation on the Maximum Ceiling Temperature and Longitudinal Decay in a Sealing Tunnel Fire. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2018, 72, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Delichatsios, M. The Flow of Fire Gases under a Beamed Ceiling. Combust. Flame 1981, 43, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. He, Y. Smoke Temperature and Velocity Decays along Corridors. Fire Saf. J. 1999, 33, 71–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hu, L.H.; Huo, R.; Li, Y.Z.; Wang, H.B.; Chow, W.K. Full-Scale Burning Tests on Studying Smoke Temperature and Velocity along a Corridor. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2005, 20, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fan, C.G.; Ji, J.; Gao, Z.H.; Sun, J.H. Experimental Study on Transverse Smoke Temperature Distribution in Road Tunnel Fires. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2013, 37, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, C.; Zhong, M.; Tian, X.; Zhang, P.; Xiao, Y.; Mei, Q. Experimental and Numerical Study on Fire-Induced Smoke Temperature in Connected Area of Metro Tunnel under Natural Ventilation. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2019, 138, 84–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Han, J.; Wang, Z.; Geng, P.; Wang, F.; Wen, J.; Liu, F. The Effect of Blockage and Tunnel Slope on Smoke Spread and Ceiling Temperature Distribution in a Natural-Ventilated Metro Depot. Energy Build. 2021, 253, 111540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, K.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, P.; Guo, Y. Numerical Study on the Impact of Wall Thermal Inertia on Maximum Smoke Temperature and Longitudinal Attenuation in Long Channel Fires. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2023, 184, 107940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Meng, N.; Hu, L.; Zhu, S.; Yang, L. Effect of Smoke Screen Height on Smoke Flow Temperature Profile beneath Platform Ceiling of Subway Station: An Experimental Investigation and Scaling Correlation. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2014, 43, 204–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tang, F.; Chen, L.; Chen, Y.; Pang, H. Experimental Study on the Effect of Ceiling Mechanical Smoke Extraction System on Transverse Temperature Decay Induced by Ceiling Jet in the Tunnel. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2020, 152, 106294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hu, L.H.; Chen, L.F.; Tang, W. A Global Model on Temperature Profile of Buoyant Ceiling Gas Flow in a Channel with Combining Mass and Heat Loss Due to Ceiling Extraction and Longitudinal Forced Air Flow. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2014, 79, 885–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ji, J.; Guo, F.; Gao, Z.; Zhu, J.; Sun, J. Numerical Investigation on the Effect of Ambient Pressure on Smoke Movement and Temperature Distribution in Tunnel Fires. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 118, 663–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Long, Z.; Yang, Y.; Liu, C.; Zhong, M. Study on the Optimal Operation Mode of Ventilation System during Metro Double-Island Platform Fire. Build. Simul. 2021, 14, 779–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ji, J.; Fan, C.G.; Zhong, W.; Shen, X.B.; Sun, J.H. Experimental Investigation on Influence of Different Transverse Fire Locations on Maximum Smoke Temperature under the Tunnel Ceiling. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2012, 55, 4817–4826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yao, Y.; Cheng, X.; Zhang, S.; Zhu, K.; Zhang, H.; Shi, L. Maximum Smoke Temperature beneath the Ceiling in an Enclosed Channel with Different Fire Locations. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 111, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tang, F.; Li, L.; Chen, W.; Tao, C.; Zhan, Z. Studies on Ceiling Maximum Thermal Smoke Temperature and Longitudinal Decay in a Tunnel Fire with Different Transverse Gas Burner Locations. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 110, 1674–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, Y.Z.; Lei, B.; Ingason, H. The Maximum Temperature of Buoyancy-Driven Smoke Flow beneath the Ceiling in Tunnel Fires. Fire Saf. J. 2011, 46, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Weng, M.; Xiong, K.; Liu, F.; Xie, J. Improved Temperature-Based Methods and Deep Learning-Based Method for Identifying the Smoke Layer Height in Tunnel with Longitudinal Ventilation. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2024, 252, 105833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, X.; Zhu, G.; He, L.; Peng, M. On Smoke Layer Thickness in Short Naturally Ventilated Tunnels with Arched Roof. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2023, 52, 103661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Du, T.; Yu, H.; Lu, X.; Yang, D. Brine-Water Experimental Study on the Propagation of Stratified Smoke Flow in Tunnel Fires under Subcritical Longitudinal Ventilation. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2023, 138, 105176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Guo, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Yuan, Y.; Cao, X.; Zhao, P. Numerical Simulation of Smoke Stratification in Tunnel Fires under Longitudinal Velocities. Undergr. Space 2021, 6, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tang, F.; Li, L.J.; Dong, M.S.; Wang, Q.; Mei, F.Z.; Hu, L.H. Characterization of Buoyant Flow Stratification Behaviors by Richardson (Froude) Number in a Tunnel Fire with Complex Combination of Longitudinal Ventilation and Ceiling Extraction. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 110, 1021–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gannouni, S.; Zinoubi, J.; Ben Maad, R. Numerical Study on the Thermal Buoyant Flow Stratification in Tunnel Fires with Longitudinal Imposed Airflow: Effect of an Upstream Blockage. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2019, 136, 230–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, L.J.; Tang, F.; Dong, M.S.; Tao, C.F. Effect of Ceiling Extraction System on the Smoke Thermal Stratification in the Longitudinal Ventilation Tunnel. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 109, 312–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Huang, D.F.; Li, S.C. An Experimental Investigation of Stratification Characteristic of Fire Smoke in the Corridor under the Effect of Outdoor Wind. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2018, 179, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Deng, T.; Norris, S.; Sharma, R.N. Numerical Investigation on the Stability of Tunnel Smoke Stratification under the Effect of Water Spray and Longitudinal Ventilation. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2021, 112, 103901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vetter, M.; Dinkov, I.; Schelb, D.; Trimis, D. Experimental Study on the Effects of Sprinkler Activation on the Stratified Smoke Layer inside a 36 M2 Enclosure. Fire Saf. J. 2021, 121, 103313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Awad, A.S.; Calay, R.K.; Badran, O.O.; Holdo, A.E. An Experimental Study of Stratified Flow in Enclosures. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2008, 28, 2150–2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Motevalli, V.; Marks, C.H. Characterizing the Unconfined Ceiling Jet under Steady-State Conditions: A Reassessment. In Fire Safety Science; Routledge: Oxfordshire, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  46. Rafinazari, A.; Hadjisophocleous, G. An Investigation of the Effect of Make-up Air Velocity on Smoke Layer Height with Asymmetric Openings and Rotational Air Flow in Atrium Fires. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 27, 100933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yi, L.; Chen, Y.; Bu, R.; Luo, C.; Zhou, Y. Visualization Study on the Effect of Ambient Wind on Smoke Layer Height in Chamber Fires under Natural Smoke Exhaust Condition. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2021, 208, 104458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. He, L.; Xu, Z.; Markert, F.; Zhao, J.; Xie, E.; Liu, Q.; Tao, H.; Tagne Sylvain Marcial, S.; Wang, Z.; Fan, C. Study on the Effect of Tunnel Dimensions on the Smoke Layer Thickness in Naturally Ventilated Short Tunnel Fires. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2021, 112, 103941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xu, Z.; Zhao, J.; Liu, Q.; Chen, H.; Liu, Y.; Geng, Z.; He, L. Experimental Investigation on Smoke Spread Characteristics and Smoke Layer Height in Tunnels. Fire Mater. 2019, 43, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Long, Z.; Chen, J.; Qiu, P.; Zhong, M. Study on the Smoke Layer Height in Subway Platform Fire under Natural Ventilation. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 56, 104758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Huo, R.; Chow, W.K.; Jin, X.H.; Li, Y.Z.; Fong, N.K. Experimental Studies on Natural Smoke Filling in Atrium Due to a Shop Fire. Build. Environ. 2005, 40, 1185–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Xi, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Mao, J.; Chow, W.; Tang, F. Maximum Ceiling Temperature and Longitudinal Distribution in a Corridor-like Enclosure with Opening. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2023, 134, 104994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Reynolds, A.J. The Scaling of Flows of Energy and Mass through Stairwells. Build. Environ. 1986, 21, 149–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ergin-Ozkan, S.; Mokhtarzadeh-Dehghan, M.R.; Reynolds, A.J. The Effect of Different Air InletSizes on the Air Flow through aStairwell. Indoor Built Environ. 1993, 2, 350–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chen, J.; Li, G.; Pan, R.; Long, Z.; Zhong, M. Numerical Study on the Airflow Characteristics and Smoke Control Condition in Stair Area of Subway Stations. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 84, 108577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chen, J.; Liu, J.; Tian, X.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, H.; Zhong, M. Study on the Effect of Obstacles on Smoke Diffusion and Airflow Structure in Subway Stations. Build. Environ. 2023, 242, 110553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lu, H.; Li, J.; Sun, S.; Wang, J.; Ye, R.; Wu, J.; Wang, Y. Study on the Propagation Characteristics of Shockwave in Dense Crowd in Corner Passage. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2024, 113, 104826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Fu, W.; Li, J.; Wang, J.; Wu, J. Risk Assessment of Fire Casualty in Underground Commercial Building Based on FFTA-BN Model. J. Saf. Sci. Resil. 2024, 5, 470–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, J.; Yu, X.; Zong, R.; Lu, S. Evacuation Route Optimization under Real-Time Toxic Gas Dispersion through CFD Simulation and Dijkstra Algorithm. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2022, 76, 104733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, J.; Yu, X.; Zong, R. A Dynamic Approach for Evaluating the Consequences of Toxic Gas Dispersion in the Chemical Plants Using CFD and Evacuation Modelling. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2020, 65, 104156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yuan, S.; Cai, J.; Reniers, G.; Yang, M.; Chen, C.; Wu, J. Safety Barrier Performance Assessment by Integrating Computational Fluid Dynamics and Evacuation Modeling for Toxic Gas Leakage Scenarios. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2022, 226, 108719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Si, J.; Li, L.; Li, Z.; Zhao, S. Experimental Analysis of Smoke Dispersion in Belt Fires by Using a Real-Size Model of the Underground Space. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2024, 53, 103839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, J.; Liu, Q.; Sun, S.; Ye, R.; Wu, J. Evolution Law of Selfish Psychology in Evacuating Crowd and Its Influence on Emergency Escape. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2025, 96, 105644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Masalegooyan, Z.; Piadeh, F.; Behzadian, K. A Comprehensive Framework for Risk Probability Assessment of Landfill Fire Incidents Using Fuzzy Fault Tree Analysis. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2022, 163, 679–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kong, D.; Lu, S.; Kang, Q.; Lo, S.; Xie, Q. Fuzzy Risk Assessment for Life Safety Under Building Fires. Fire Technol. 2014, 50, 977–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Qie, Z.; Yan, H. A Causation Analysis of Chinese Subway Construction Accidents Based on Fault Tree Analysis-Bayesian Network. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 887073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jafari, M.J.; Pouyakian, M.; Khanteymoori, A.; Hanifi, S.M. Reliability Evaluation of Fire Alarm Systems Using Dynamic Bayesian Networks and Fuzzy Fault Tree Analysis. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2020, 67, 104229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liu, Y.; Ma, X.; Qiao, W.; Luo, H.; He, P. Human Factor Risk Modeling for Shipyard Operation by Mapping Fuzzy Fault Tree into Bayesian Network. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Yuan, Q.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, X. An Integrated Quantitative Risk Assessment Method for Underground Engineering Fires. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 16934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chen, J.; Ji, J.; Ding, L.; Wu, J. Fire Risk Assessment in Cotton Storage Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation and Bayesian Network. Fire Mater. 2020, 44, 683–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wu, J.; Hu, Z.; Chen, J.; Li, Z. Risk Assessment of Underground Subway Stations to Fire Disasters Using Bayesian Network. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wang, N.; Gao, Y.; Li, C.-Y.; Gao, W.-M. Integrated Agent-Based Simulation and Evacuation Risk-Assessment Model for Underground Building Fire: A Case Study. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 40, 102609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Li, X.; Chen, W.; Wang, C.; Kassem, M.A. Study on Evacuation Behavior of Urban Underground Complex in Fire Emergency Based on System Dynamics. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wang, D.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, T.; Yang, F. An Investigation of Fire Evacuation Performance in Irregular Underground Commercial Building Affected by Multiple Parameters. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 37, 102146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lu, T.; Zeng, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, X.; Lu, X. AI-Powered Safe Egress Time Assessment for Complex Building Fire Evacuation. J. Build. Eng. 2025, 110, 113013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Abouelhamd, I.M.S.; Kuga, K.; Saito, K.; Takai, M.; Kikuchi, T.; Ito, K. Experimental and Computational Predictions of Odorant Transport Dynamics from Indoor Environment to Olfactory Tissue. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2025, 126, 106397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Farahmand, K.; Srinivasan, R.; Hamidi, M. CFD Heat Transfer Simulation of the Human Upper Respiratory Tract for Oronasal Breathing Condition. IJIEC 2012, 3, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Goodarzi-Ardakani, V.; Taeibi-Rahni, M.; Salimi, M.R.; Ahmadi, G. Computational Simulation of Temperature and Velocity Distribution in Human Upper Respiratory Airway during Inhalation of Hot Air. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2016, 223, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Phuong, N.L.; Yamashita, M.; Yoo, S.-J.; Ito, K. Prediction of Convective Heat Transfer Coefficient of Human Upper and Lower Airway Surfaces in Steady and Unsteady Breathing Conditions. Build. Environ. 2016, 100, 172–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Xu, X.; Shang, Y.; Tian, L.; Weng, W.; Tu, J. Fate of the Inhaled Smoke Particles from Fire Scenes in the Nasal Airway of a Realistic Firefighter: A Simulation Study. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 2019, 16, 273–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Xu, X.; Ni, S.; Fu, M.; Zheng, X.; Luo, N.; Weng, W. Numerical Investigation of Airflow, Heat Transfer and Particle Deposition for Oral Breathing in a Realistic Human Upper Airway Model. J. Therm. Biol. 2017, 70, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Xu, X.; Shang, Y.; Tian, L.; Weng, W.; Tu, J. A Numerical Study on Firefighter Nasal Airway Dosimetry of Smoke Particles from a Realistic Composite Deck Fire. J. Aerosol Sci. 2018, 123, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Xu, X.; Wu, J.; Weng, W.; Fu, M. Investigation of Inhalation and Exhalation Flow Pattern in a Realistic Human Upper Airway Model by PIV Experiments and CFD Simulations. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2020, 19, 1679–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Cui, X.; Song, W.; Xue, Y.; Jing, H.; Lei, M.; Ma, H.; He, X.; Zou, P.; Wu, B.; Wang, J. Numerical Analysis of Micro Lunar Dust Deposition in the Human Nasal Airway. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 461, 132682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Li, J.; Ma, J.; Dong, J.; Yang, W.; Ahmadi, G.; Tu, J.; Tian, L. Microfiber Transport Characterization in Human Nasal Cavity—Effect of Fiber Length. J. Aerosol Sci. 2022, 160, 105908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Yan, Y.; Li, X.; Tao, Y.; Fang, X.; Yan, P.; Tu, J. Numerical Investigation of Pilots’ Micro-Environment in an Airliner Cockpit. Build. Environ. 2022, 217, 109043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Xu, X.; Shang, Y.; Tian, L.; Weng, W.; Tu, J. Inhalation Health Risk Assessment for the Human Tracheobronchial Tree under PM Exposure in a Bus Stop Scene. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2019, 19, 1365–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhao, Y.; Kong, J.; Wang, X.; Cao, Y.; You, W.; Liu, H. Bibliometric Analysis of Subway Fire under Longitudinal Ventilation. Emerg. Manag. Sci. Technol. 2025, 5, e015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lyu, H.-F.; Wang, C.-P.; Deng, J.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, W.-F. Human Behaviour and Evacuation Time for Large Underground Comprehensive Buildings during Fire Risk Process. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2023, 84, 105134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Han, Z.Y.; Weng, W.G.; Huang, Q.Y. Numerical and Experimental Investigation on the Dynamic Airflow of Human Movement in a Full-Scale Cabin. HVACR Res. 2014, 20, 444–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Han, Z.Y.; Weng, W.G.; Huang, Q.Y.; Fu, M.; Yang, J.; Luo, N. Aerodynamic Characteristics of Human Movement Behaviours in Full-Scale Environment: Comparison of Limbs Pendulum and Body Motion. Indoor Built Environ. 2013, 24, 87–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Luo, N.; Weng, W.; Xu, X.; Fu, M. Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Wake Flow of a Human-Shaped Manikin: Experiments by PIV and Simulations by CFD. Build. Simul. 2018, 11, 1189–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhao, Y.; Feng, Y.; Ma, L. Impacts of Human Movement and Ventilation Mode on the Indoor Environment, Droplet Evaporation, and Aerosol Transmission Risk at Airport Terminals. Build. Environ. 2022, 224, 109527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kalliomäki, P.; Saarinen, P.; Tang, J.W.; Koskela, H. Airflow Patterns through Single Hinged and Sliding Doors in Hospital Isolation Rooms—Effect of Ventilation, Flow Differential and Passage. Build. Environ. 2016, 107, 154–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wu, J.; Weng, W.; Fu, M.; Li, Y.; Lan, M. Enhancement Effect of Human Movement on the High Risk Range of Viral Aerosols Exhaled by a Sitting Person. Build. Environ. 2022, 218, 109136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wu, J.; Weng, W.; Fu, M.; Li, Y. Numerical Study of Transient Indoor Airflow and Virus-Laden Droplet Dispersion: Impact of Interactive Human Movement. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 869, 161750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Han, Z.; Weng, W.; Huang, Q. Numerical Investigation on the Effects of Human Movements on Smoke Propagation in Building Fire. Procedia Eng. 2013, 62, 470–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  98. Luo, N.; Weng, W.; Xu, X.; Hong, T.; Fu, M.; Sun, K. Assessment of Occupant-Behavior-Based Indoor Air Quality and Its Impacts on Human Exposure Risk: A Case Study Based on the Wildfires in Northern California. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 686, 1251–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Benabed, A.; Boulbair, A.; Limam, K. Experimental Study of the Human Walking-Induced Fine and Ultrafine Particle Resuspension in a Test Chamber. Build Environ. 2020, 171, 106655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Qian, J.; Peccia, J.; Ferro, A.R. Walking-Induced Particle Resuspension in Indoor Environments. Atmos. Environ. 2014, 89, 464–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wu, J.; Geng, J.; Fu, M.; Weng, W. Multi-person Movement-induced Airflow and the Effects on Virus-laden Expiratory Droplet Dispersion in Indoor Environments. Indoor Air 2022, 32, 13119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Wu, J.; Weng, W.; Shen, L.; Fu, M. Transient and Continuous Effects of Indoor Human Movement on Nanoparticle Concentrations in a Sitting Person’s Breathing Zone. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 805, 149970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Sun, P.; Bisschop, R.; Niu, H.; Huang, X. A Review of Battery Fires in Electric Vehicles. Fire Technol. 2020, 56, 1361–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Wang, J. Inhibition Effect and Kinetics Studies on the Deflagration Characteristics of Hydrogen Compressed Natural Gas (HCNG) by C6F12O and CO2. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2025, 113, 523–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Shoshe, M.A.M.S.; Rahman, M.A. Improvement of Heat and Smoke Confinement Using Air Curtains in Informal Shopping Malls. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 46, 103676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Wang, H.; Chen, Q.; Liu, Y. Investigation of the Quasi-Periodic Airflow Oscillation and Ventilation Performance of an Enclosed Environment with a Jet Air Supply. Energy Build. 2022, 265, 112104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Liu, C.; Zhong, M.; Song, S.; Xia, F.; Tian, X.; Yang, Y.; Long, Z. Experimental and Numerical Study on Critical Ventilation Velocity for Confining Fire Smoke in Metro Connected Tunnel. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2020, 97, 103296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Seuntjens, O.; Belmans, B.; Buyle, M.; Audenaert, A. A Critical Review on the Adaptability of Ventilation Systems: Current Problems, Solutions and Opportunities. Build. Environ. 2022, 212, 108816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Li, J.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Li, X.; Huang, Y. Study on Smoke Control under Mechanical Exhaust Strategy in a Cross-Type Interchange Subway Station. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2021, 112, 103897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Chen, L.F.; Hu, L.H.; Zhang, X.L.; Zhang, X.Z.; Zhang, X.C.; Yang, L.Z. Thermal Buoyant Smoke Back-Layering Flow Length in a Longitudinal Ventilated Tunnel with Ceiling Extraction at Difference Distance from Heat Source. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2015, 78, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Li, Y.Z.; Lei, B.; Ingason, H. Study of Critical Velocity and Backlayering Length in Longitudinally Ventilated Tunnel Fires. Fire Saf. J. 2010, 45, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Guo, Q.; Li, Y.Z.; Ingason, H.; Yan, Z.; Zhu, H. Theoretical and Numerical Study on Mass Flow Rates of Smoke Exhausted from Short Vertical Shafts in Naturally Ventilated Urban Road Tunnel Fires. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2021, 111, 103782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Zhang, S.; Cheng, X.; Yao, Y.; Zhu, K.; Li, K.; Lu, S.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, H. An Experimental Investigation on Blockage Effect of Metro Train on the Smoke Back-Layering in Subway Tunnel Fires. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 99, 214–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Wu, F.; Zhou, R.; Shen, G.; Jiang, J.; Li, K. Effects of Ambient Pressure on Smoke Back-Layering in Subway Tunnel Fires. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2018, 79, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Li, Y.Z.; Ingason, H. Effect of Cross Section on Critical Velocity in Longitudinally Ventilated Tunnel Fires. Fire Saf. J. 2017, 91, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Lee, S.R.; Ryou, H.S. An Experimental Study of the Effect of the Aspect Ratio on the Critical Velocity in Longitudinal Ventilation Tunnel Fires. J. Fire Sci. 2005, 23, 119–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Ko, G.H.; Kim, S.R.; Ryou, H.S. An Experimental Study on the Effect of Slope on the Critical Velocity in Tunnel Fires. J. Fire Sci. 2010, 28, 27–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Yi, L.; Xu, Q.; Xu, Z.; Wu, D. An Experimental Study on Critical Velocity in Sloping Tunnel with Longitudinal Ventilation under Fire. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2014, 43, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Du, T.; Yang, D.; Ding, Y. Driving Force for Preventing Smoke Backlayering in Downhill Tunnel Fires Using Forced Longitudinal Ventilation. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2018, 79, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Zhong, W.; Li, Z.; Wang, T.; Liang, T.; Liu, Z. Experimental Study on the Influence of Different Transverse Fire Locations on the Critical Longitudinal Ventilation Velocity in Tunnel Fires. Fire Technol. 2015, 51, 1217–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Yao, Y.; Cheng, X.; Zhang, S.; Zhu, K.; Shi, L.; Zhang, H. Smoke Back-Layering Flow Length in Longitudinal Ventilated Tunnel Fires with Vertical Shaft in the Upstream. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 107, 738–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Wang, Y.F.; Yan, P.N.; Zhang, B.; Jiang, J.C. Thermal Buoyant Smoke Back-Layering Length in a Naturally Ventilated Tunnel with Vertical Shafts. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 93, 947–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Huang, L.; Ma, J.; Li, A.; Wu, Y. Scale Modeling Experiments of Fire-Induced Smoke and Extraction via Mechanical Ventilation in an Underground Hydropower Plant. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 44, 536–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Liu, Y.; Li, Y.Z.; Ingason, H.; Liu, F. Control of Thermal-Driven Smoke Flow at Stairways in a Subway Platform Fire. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2021, 165, 106937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Acherar, L.; Wang, H.-Y.; Garo, J.-P.; Coudour, B. Impact of Air Intake Position on Fire Dynamics in Mechanically Ventilated Compartment. Fire Saf. J. 2020, 118, 103210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Magnognou, B.; Garo, J.P.; Coudour, B.; Wang, H.Y. Risk Analysis of Unburnt Gas Ignition in an Exhaust System Connected to a Confined and Mechanically Ventilated Enclosure Fire. Fire Saf. J. 2017, 91, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Razeghi, S.M.J.; Safarzadeh, M.; Pasdarshahri, H. Evaluation of Air Curtain and Emergency Exhaust System for Smoke Confinement of an Enclosure. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 33, 101650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Huo, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Jia, Y.; Liu, D.; Guan, J.; Lin, G.; Zhang, Y. A Deep Separable Convolutional Neural Network for Multiscale Image-Based Smoke Detection. Fire Technol. 2022, 58, 1445–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Huo, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, J.; Wang, J. 3DVSD: An End-to-End 3D Convolutional Object Detection Network for Video Smoke Detection. Fire Saf. J. 2022, 134, 103690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Ding, S.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, X.; Song, W. Hyper Real-Time Flame Detection: Dynamic Insights from Event Cameras and FlaDE Dataset. Expert Syst. Appl. 2025, 263, 125746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Dlouha, D.; Pokorny, J.; Podkul, M.; Brumarova, L.; Szurgacz, D.; Tomaskova, M.; Vlcek, V.; Zhironkin, S. Calculation Technique CSN for Smoke Layer Interface Assessment during Fires in Industry. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2025, 94, 105564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Geng, J.; Wu, J.; Yang, J.; Fu, M.; Weng, W. Numerical Simulation of Cooling Effect of Human-PCM-Clothing Model in Hot Environments. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2023, 192, 108393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. He, F.; Wu, J.; Li, Y.; Fu, M.; He, S.; Weng, W. The Impact of Leak Gap Size and Position on Surgical Mask Performance of Source Control: A Numerical Study. Build. Environ. 2025, 267, 112241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Lutsenko, N.A.; Kim, A.S.; Fetsov, S.S. Performance of Two-Layer Filters for Innovative Respiratory Protective Devices Containing Granular Phase Change Materials. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2025, 217, 110029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. GB/T 38451-2019; Respiratory Protection—Self-Contained Open-Circuit Compressed Air Breathing Apparatus for Escape. State Administration for Market Regulation: Beijing, China, 2019.
  136. Zhu, J.; Zhu, R.; Hu, Y.; Wang, Z. Low-Cost and Temperature-Resistant Mullite Fiber Sponges with Superior Thermal Insulation and High-Temperature PM Filtration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 305, 122445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Li, L.; Jia, C.; Liu, Y.; Fang, B.; Zhu, W.; Li, X.; Schaefer, L.; Li, Z.; Zhang, F.; Feng, X.; et al. Nanograin–Glass Dual-Phasic, Elasto-Flexible, Fatigue-Tolerant, and Heat-Insulating Ceramic Sponges at Large Scales. Mater. Today 2022, 54, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Fu, T.; Wang, Y.-Z. Design and Development of Fire-Safety Materials in Artificial Intelligence Era. Acc. Mater. Res. 2025, 6, 544–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The mechanism of human injury in underground fire smoke.
Figure 1. The mechanism of human injury in underground fire smoke.
Sustainability 17 09922 g001
Table 1. Some underground-space fire accidents.
Table 1. Some underground-space fire accidents.
TimeLocationReasonConsequence
18 November 1987King’s Cross St. Pancras Station, London Underground, UKEscalator fire31 fatalities
25 December 2000Dongdu Commercial Building, Luoyang, ChinaIllegal hot work (welding) operations309 fatalities, 7 injured
18 February 2003Jungangno Station, Daegu Metro, South KoreaArson198 fatalities, 298 missing
5 June 2013Moscow Metro, RussiaCable fire66 injured
12 January 2015L’Enfant Plaza Station, Washington D.C. Metro, USATrain carriage fire1 fatality, multiple injuries
26 January 2016Ginza Station, Tokyo Metro, JapanCombustion of unknown substance at station ventilation shaft68,000 passengers affected
10 February 2017Tsim Sha Tsui Station, Hong Kong, ChinaArson18 injured
27 March 2020110th Street Station, New York City Subway, USATrain carriage fire1 fatality, 16 injured
2 January 2022Xinchangxing Market, Dalian, ChinaUnauthorized welding ignited polyurethane foam in underground cold storage during construction8 fatalities, 5 injured, 1 firefighter fatality
23 January 2023Barranca del Muerto Station, Mexico City Metro, MexicoElectrical short circuit26 cases of respiratory discomfort
24 January 2024Jialeyuan Street Shops, Xinyu, ChinaViolation of hot work regulations during cold storage construction39 fatalities, 9 injured
Table 2. Maximum temperature models under different fire scenarios.
Table 2. Maximum temperature models under different fire scenarios.
Previous StudiesMaximum Temperature ModelsFire Scene Characteristics
Alpert [13] T m a x = 16.9 Q 2 / 3 H 5 / 3 Ceiling without boundary
Ji et al. [30] T m a x = 17.9 Q 2 / 3 H 5 / 3 Restriction of side wall
Yao et al. [31] T m a x = 22.7 Q 2 / 3 H 5 / 3 Enclosed channel
Tang et al. [32] Δ T m a x = 1.37 0.37 D w 2 Q ˙ u r 1 / 3 H d 5 / 3 , u > 0.19 17.5 1.33 0.33 D w 2 Q ˙ 2 / 3 H d 5 / 3 , u 0.19 Effect of transverse fire position
Li et al. [33] Δ T m a x = Q ˙ V r 1 / 3 H d 5 / 3 , V > 0.19 17.5 Q ˙ 2 / 3 H d 5 / 3 , V 0.19 Effect of wind speed
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, J.; Liu, M.; Tang, Y.; Xu, Y.; He, F.; Wang, J.; Tsai, Y.; Yang, Y.; Long, Z. Assessing Human Exposure to Fire Smoke in Underground Spaces: Challenges and Prospects for Protective Technologies. Sustainability 2025, 17, 9922. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17229922

AMA Style

Wu J, Liu M, Tang Y, Xu Y, He F, Wang J, Tsai Y, Yang Y, Long Z. Assessing Human Exposure to Fire Smoke in Underground Spaces: Challenges and Prospects for Protective Technologies. Sustainability. 2025; 17(22):9922. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17229922

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Jialin, Meijie Liu, Yongqi Tang, Yehui Xu, Feifan He, Jinghong Wang, Yunting Tsai, Yi Yang, and Zeng Long. 2025. "Assessing Human Exposure to Fire Smoke in Underground Spaces: Challenges and Prospects for Protective Technologies" Sustainability 17, no. 22: 9922. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17229922

APA Style

Wu, J., Liu, M., Tang, Y., Xu, Y., He, F., Wang, J., Tsai, Y., Yang, Y., & Long, Z. (2025). Assessing Human Exposure to Fire Smoke in Underground Spaces: Challenges and Prospects for Protective Technologies. Sustainability, 17(22), 9922. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17229922

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop