Next Article in Journal
Optimizing Spatial Scales for Evaluating High-Resolution CO2 Fossil Fuel Emissions: Multi-Source Data and Machine Learning Approach
Previous Article in Journal
30-Year Dynamics of Vegetation Loss in China’s Surface Coal Mines: A Comparative Evaluation of CCDC and LandTrendr Algorithms
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Scale Development Study on Green Marketing Mix Practice Culture in Small and Medium Enterprises
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Sustainable Marketing: Can Retailers’ Profit-Motivated Consumer Education Enhance Green R&D and Production?

1
School of Management and Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
2
School of Automation Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(20), 9008; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17209008 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 5 September 2025 / Revised: 5 October 2025 / Accepted: 6 October 2025 / Published: 11 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Marketing and Consumer Management)

Abstract

Drawing from practices at Walmart, we model a supply chain where the manufacturer conducts product R&D while the retailer distributes products to two distinct consumer segments: green-conscious consumers who translate environmental principles into purchasing decisions, and non-green-conscious consumers who are deterred by perceived high costs and information deficits. The retailer engages in green education targeted at non-green-conscious consumers, providing clear product explanations to improve their willingness to pay for sustainable products, though this education is motivated by profit maximization rather than altruistic environmental responsibility. Our analysis reveals that while retailer green education can boost product R&D and adoption under certain conditions, this creates a ‘consumer education paradox’—a situation where green education could further enhance product R&D and adoption, but the retailer forgoes it because doing so does not contribute to profit. This occurs because profit-driven retailers limit education to self-beneficial ranges, creating tension between individual profit maximization and overall environmental performance. We then propose two government subsidy solutions—green product quantity subsidies and product R&D subsidies—to resolve this paradox. Both effectively alleviate the tension, but green innovation subsidies, despite requiring greater government investment, consistently outperform in fostering innovation and adoption, offering superior environmental outcomes.
Keywords: supply chain management; consumer education; green R& D; government subsidies; game theory; Stackelberg game; consumer segments supply chain management; consumer education; green R& D; government subsidies; game theory; Stackelberg game; consumer segments

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, Z.; Zhang, J.; Yan, W. Sustainable Marketing: Can Retailers’ Profit-Motivated Consumer Education Enhance Green R&D and Production? Sustainability 2025, 17, 9008. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17209008

AMA Style

He Z, Zhang J, Yan W. Sustainable Marketing: Can Retailers’ Profit-Motivated Consumer Education Enhance Green R&D and Production? Sustainability. 2025; 17(20):9008. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17209008

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Zixi, Junqiang Zhang, and Wei Yan. 2025. "Sustainable Marketing: Can Retailers’ Profit-Motivated Consumer Education Enhance Green R&D and Production?" Sustainability 17, no. 20: 9008. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17209008

APA Style

He, Z., Zhang, J., & Yan, W. (2025). Sustainable Marketing: Can Retailers’ Profit-Motivated Consumer Education Enhance Green R&D and Production? Sustainability, 17(20), 9008. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17209008

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop