Understanding the Impact of Social, Hedonic, and Promotional Cues on Purchase Intention in Short Video Platforms: A Dual-Path Model for Digital Sustainability
Abstract
1. Introduction
- (1)
- To explore how perceived social interaction, entertainment, and promotion affect consumers’ perceived value and immersive experience in short video ads;
- (2)
- To analyze how perceived value and flow experience affect consumers’ purchase intention in an environmentally friendly e-commerce environment;
- (3)
- To identify which types of stimuli have the most significant impact on consumer responses, thereby providing a reference for platform design and content strategy.
2. Literature Review
2.1. Theoretical Background
2.2. Perceived Social Interaction (PSI), Entertainment (E), Sales Promotion (SP), and Perceived Value (PV)
2.3. Perceived Social Interaction (PSI), Entertainment (E), Sales Promotion (SP), and Flow Experience (FE)
2.4. Perceived Value (PV), Flow Experience (FE), and Purchase Intention (PI)
3. Methodology
3.1. Sampling Method and Participant Recruitment
3.2. Ethical Considerations and Data Protection
3.3. Data Analysis Techniques
3.4. Measurement Items
4. Results and Discussion
Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA)
5. Conclusions
5.1. Theoretical Contributions
5.2. Practical Contributions
5.3. Limitations and Future Research Lines
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- XINHUA China’s Internet Users Surpass 1.1 Billion, Powering Digital Economy and Innovation. 2025. Available online: https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/statistics/202501/18/content_WS678ae7f6c6d0868f4e8eef08.html (accessed on 1 January 2025).
- Bai, B. Research on the Influence Construction and Communication Mechanism of Fashion Brands Conducted by Social Media Platforms. Asia Pac. Econ. Manag. Rev. 2024, 1, 40–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zuo, M.; Shen, Y. How features and affordances of a metaverse portal engage users? Evidence from exergames. Internet Res. 2024, 34, 239–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilson, M. Relational Marketing: Case Studies and Best Practices in Multisensory Design, Gamification and Empathetic Communication to Cultivate Brand Experiences. Master’s Thesis, Hussman School of Journalism and Media, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, X. Social Influence on Digital Content Contribution and Consumption; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Mehrabian, A.; Russell, J.A. The basic emotional impact of environments. Percept. Mot. Ski. 1974, 38, 283–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeithaml, V.A. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Mark. 1988, 52, 2–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: Experiencing Flow in Work and Play; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1975. [Google Scholar]
- Manic, M. Short-form video content and consumer engagement in digital landscapes. Bull. Transilv. Univ. Brasov. Ser. V Econ. Sci. 2024, 17, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, T.; Bansal, S. The AI advantage: Assessing personalization effects on e-commerce shopping behaviors. Int. J. Sci. Res. (IJSR) 2019, 8, 2313–2320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, N.; Wan, J.; Ma, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, J. How digital platform capabilities improve sustainable innovation performance of firms: The mediating role of open innovation. J. Bus. Res. 2023, 167, 114080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loonam, J.; O’Regan, N. Global value chains and digital platforms: Implications for strategy. Strateg. Chang. 2022, 31, 161–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isensee, C.; Teuteberg, F.; Griese, K.M. Digital platforms and the SDGs: A socio-eco-technical framework for SMEs based on cross-case analysis. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2025, 32, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McQuail, D. McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory, 6th ed.; SAGE: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, M. The social attributes of social media advertising and its impact on user engagement. J. New Media Res. 2020, 12, 45–52. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, L.; Wang, S.; Zhang, M. The impact of information exchange during interactive processes on participants’ psychological perceptions. Commun. Res. 2021, 28, 123–135. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, S.S. The importance of fan interaction for the dissemination effect of Douyin short-video advertisements. Social Media Stud. 2022, 15, 78–89. [Google Scholar]
- Indriawan, B.M.; Santoso, I.H. Pengaruh Sales Promotion, Content Marketing, Dan Shopping Lifestyle Content Creator Tiktok Terhadap Keputusan Impulse Buying Pada E-Commerce Shopee. EKOMBIS Rev. J. Ilm. Ekon. Bisnis 2023, 11, 905–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elliott, M.T.; Speck, P.S. Factors that Affect Attitude Toward a Retail Web Site. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2005, 13, 40–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tong, Z.Y.; Huang, Y.X. New Trends in the Development of Online Game Short Video Advertising in China. News Lovers 2020, 3, 93–96. [Google Scholar]
- Song, M.Y. Discussion on Influencing Factors of “Creative Mid-roll” Advertisement on Consumer Purchase Intention. J. Guangzhou Radio TV Univ. 2020, 20, 91–100+112. [Google Scholar]
- Woodruff, R.B. Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1997, 25, 139–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.; Dubinsky, A.J. A conceptual model of perceived customer value in e-commerce: A preliminary investigation. Psychol. Mark. 2003, 20, 323–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. Optim. Exp. Psychol. Stud. Flow Conscious. 1988, 2, 15–35. [Google Scholar]
- Hoffman, D.L.; Novak, T.P. Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. J. Mark. 1996, 60, 50–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, D.W.; Wang, Z. The “Dark Side” of User-Generated Content: Research on Users’ Negative Usage Behavior Intention on Short Video Platforms. Mod. Commun. 2021, 43, 137–144. [Google Scholar]
- Ajzen, I. Application of the theory of planned behavior to leisure choice. J. Leis. Res. 1992, 24, 207–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eagly, A.H.; Chaiken, S. The Psychology of Attitudes; Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.X. Research on the Impact of Social Media Advertising Brand Image and Narrative Person on Consumer Advertising Attitude. Master’s Thesis, Shandong University, Jinan, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, C.; He, L.; Xu, S. Relationships among para-social interaction, perceived benefits, community commitment, and customer citizenship behavior: Evidence from a social live-streaming platform. Acta Psychologica 2024, 250, 104534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Gao, J.Y. Host Interactivity, Perceived Value and User Engagement Behavior in E-commerce Live Streaming. J. Chongqing Univ. Sci. Technol. (Soc. Sci. Ed.) 2024, 4, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Hanaysha, J.R.; Alhyasat, K.M. Examining the Effect of Social Media Advertising Features on Customer Perceived Value and Brand Love in the Retail Industry. Telemat. Inform. Rep. 2025, 18, 100208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gardner, M.J. Deal or no deal: Sales promotion influence on consumer evaluation of deal value and brand attitude. Small Bus. Inst. J. 2022, 18, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, Y.Q. Research on Short Video Platform Marketing Strategy of F Company’s Hyaluronic Acid Beauty Drink. Master’s Thesis, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Linghu, D.Z.; Wu, X.L.; Li, Y.N.; Yei, F. Research on the Influence Mechanism of Low-carbon Classification Standards on Heterogeneous Enterprise Carbon Emission Decisions. Chin. J. Manag. Sci. 2023, 31, 46–55. [Google Scholar]
- Hoang, V.T.; Dang, H.P. Exploring How the Characteristics of Live Streaming Affect Impulse Buying Behaviour in Live Streaming Commerce: The Mediating Effect of Trust and Flow Experience. Int. J. Bus. Sci. Appl. Manag. 2024, 19, 77–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.W.; Qiao, H.; Yang, S.G.; Huang, T. Preliminary Exploration of Children’s Exhibition Hall Design in Science and Technology Museums from the Perspective of Exhibition and Education Integration. Nat. Sci. Museum Res. 2024, 4, 45–55. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; He, J.; Li, J. The role of flow experience in virtual influencer marketing: Insights into aesthetic, entertainment and parasocial influences on purchase intention. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, H.Y.; Xiong, J.W.; Mao, L.J. The “Seeing” Effect of Brand Rituals: How Brand Rituals Affect Consumer Trust. Bus. Econ. Manag. 2020, 12, 11. [Google Scholar]
- Huo, C.; Wang, X.; Sadiq, M.W.; Pang, M. Exploring factors affecting consumer’s impulse buying behavior in live-streaming shopping: Interactive research based upon SOR model. Sage Open 2023, 13, 21582440231172678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, C.H. Western Customer Value Research and Its Practical Implications. Nankai Bus. Rev. 2001, 2, 51–55. [Google Scholar]
- Sae-tae, K.; Wang, Q. Satisfied but no payment: The impact of perceived value on continuance intention and purchase intention in music streaming services. Telemat. Inform. Rep. 2024, 16, 100179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.S. Research on Consumer Participation in Organic Agricultural Products on Social E-Commerce Platforms from the Perspective of “People-Goods-Scene”. Master’s Thesis, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang, China, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Ouyang, L.Q. Research on the Impact of Consumer Participation on Purchase Intention in Virtual CSR Co-Creation. Master’s Thesis, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, Y.; Cheng, S.; Huang, H. Exploring the Impact of Short Videos on Travel Intentions: A Mediation Analysis of Perceived Value and Flow Experience. SCIREA J. Sociol. 2025, 9, 94–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bryman, A. Social Research Methods; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, S.; Jiang, J. Preference for online social interaction: Research on the potential influencing factors. Proc. Int. Conf. Manag. Comput. Educ. Informatiz. 2015, 25, 163–167. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, S.; Deng, F.; Xiao, J. Research on impulse purchase decision of audiences on live streaming platforms: From the perspective of dual paths perspective. Financ. Econ. 2021, 5, 119–132. [Google Scholar]
- Ridings, C.M.; Gefen, D.; Arinze, B. Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2002, 11, 271–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sweeney, J.C.; Soutar, G.N. Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. J. Retail. 2001, 77, 203–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandon, P.; Wansink, B.; Laurent, G. A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness. J. Mark. 2000, 64, 65–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, H.X.; Wang, X.H.; Zhou, B.G. Relationship among Interaction, Presence and Consumer Trust in B2C Online Shopping. Manag. Rev. 2015, 2, 43–54. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, H. Exploring web users’ optimal flow experiences. Inf. Technol. People 2014, 27, 262–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, L.; Wang, Y. The role of trust and flow in live streaming e-commerce: A study on consumers’ purchase intention. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 538301. [Google Scholar]
- Song, J. Understanding the purchase intention in live streaming from social image. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2020, 7, 123. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, L.T.; Bentler, P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. 1999, 6, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.L. Complex Experience and Influencing Factors of Short Video Consumption. J. Commun. Rev. 2021, 74, 24–33. [Google Scholar]
- Tonietto, G.N.; Barasch, A. Generating content increases enjoyment by immersing consumers and accelerating perceived time. J. Mark. 2021, 85, 83–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Categories | N | % | |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 218 | 49.8 |
Female | 220 | 50.2 | |
Age | ~18 | 16 | 3.7 |
18~28 | 182 | 41.6 | |
26~30 | 82 | 18.7 | |
31~40 | 63 | 14.4 | |
41~50 | 38 | 8.7 | |
50~ | 57 | 13.0 | |
Highest Level of Education | ~High school | 153 | 34.9 |
Junior college | 75 | 17.1 | |
Bachelor’s degree | 144 | 32.9 | |
Postgraduate~ | 66 | 15.1 | |
Occupation | Current student | 102 | 23.3 |
Employee of SOE/state-owned institution | 34 | 7.8 | |
Employee of private enterprise | 175 | 40.0 | |
Freelancer | 57 | 13.0 | |
Other | 70 | 16.0 | |
Average Daily Time Spent Browsing Short Videos | ~30 min | 76 | 17.4 |
30 min~1 h | 146 | 33.3 | |
1~2 h | 120 | 27.4 | |
2 h~ | 96 | 21.9 | |
App | Douyin (TikTok) | 216 | 49.3 |
Kuaishou | 73 | 16.7 | |
Xiaohongshu | 74 | 16.9 | |
Bilibili | 57 | 13.0 | |
Other | 18 | 4.1 | |
Short Video Viewing Duration | ~1 year | 113 | 25.8 |
1~2 year | 93 | 21.2 | |
2~3 year | 86 | 19.6 | |
3 years~ | 146 | 33.3 |
Variable | Sample Items |
---|---|
Perceived Social Interaction Jiang et al. (2015) [47]; Huang, et al (2021) [48]; Ridings, et al (2002) [49] | “I feel that the short video enables effective communication with the brand,” “I feel involved in the short video,” “I feel the short video responds to my needs.” |
Entertainment Sweeney & Soutar (2001) [50] | “I find the short video content enjoyable” “Watching this short video makes me feel happy” “This short video is highly engaging” “This short video helps me temporarily escape from everyday worries.” |
Sales Promotion Chandon et al. (2000) [51] and Zhao, et al (2015) [52] | “The promotional activities in this short video offer consider-able discounts” “The promotional offers in the short video are time-limited” “The promotions are highly relevant to my needs” “The promotions make me feel I’m getting good value for money” “The promotions create a strong desire to purchase.” |
Perceived Value Chen & Dubinsky (2003) [23] and Woodruff (1997) [22] | “I think the products recommended in this short video are worth the price” “This short video provides valuable product information” “The recommended products meet my needs” “Compared to others, the products in this short video offer greater value.” |
Flow Experience Hoffman & Novak (1996) [25] and Chen (2014) [53] | “I am completely immersed when watching the short video” “I lose track of time while watching” “I concentrate deeply when watching” “I feel highly engaged while watching” “I forget the environment around me while watching the short video.” |
Purchase Intention Gong et al. (2020) [54] and Song (2020) [55] | “I am willing to purchase the product recommended in the short video” “I would like to try the recommended product” “I am likely to purchase the product” “I would consider buying the product featured in the short video.” |
Estimate | S.E. | C.R. | AVE | CR | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | B | |||||
PSI6 | 0.631 | 1.000 | 0.395 | 0.797 | ||
PSI5 | 0.654 | 1.062 | 0.092 | 11.577 | ||
PSI4 | 0.631 | 0.977 | 0.087 | 11.249 | ||
PSI3 | 0.613 | 1.012 | 0.092 | 10.981 | ||
PSI2 | 0.642 | 1.021 | 0.090 | 11.410 | ||
PSI1 | 0.599 | 0.959 | 0.089 | 10.772 | ||
E4 | 0.617 | 1.000 | 0.390 | 0.719 | ||
E3 | 0.598 | 0.959 | 0.096 | 10.034 | ||
E2 | 0.654 | 1.005 | 0.094 | 10.725 | ||
E1 | 0.628 | 0.991 | 0.095 | 10.412 | ||
SP6 | 0.592 | 1.000 | 0.338 | 0.753 | ||
SP5 | 0.571 | 1.002 | 0.101 | 9.922 | ||
SP4 | 0.594 | 1.094 | 0.107 | 10.227 | ||
SP3 | 0.568 | 1.058 | 0.107 | 9.875 | ||
SP2 | 0.561 | 1.033 | 0.106 | 9.784 | ||
SP1 | 0.599 | 1.073 | 0.104 | 10.289 | ||
PV1 | 0.672 | 1.000 | 0.436 | 0.822 | ||
PV2 | 0.666 | 1.007 | 0.080 | 12.569 | ||
PV3 | 0.644 | 0.931 | 0.076 | 12.189 | ||
PV4 | 0.693 | 1.013 | 0.078 | 13.013 | ||
PV5 | 0.651 | 1.021 | 0.083 | 12.308 | ||
PV6 | 0.632 | 0.953 | 0.080 | 11.980 | ||
FE7 | 0.597 | 1.000 | 0.401 | 0.823 | ||
FE6 | 0.653 | 1.160 | 0.105 | 11.054 | ||
FE5 | 0.656 | 1.106 | 0.100 | 11.089 | ||
FE4 | 0.649 | 1.071 | 0.097 | 10.999 | ||
FE3 | 0.680 | 1.216 | 0.107 | 11.376 | ||
FE2 | 0.592 | 1.015 | 0.099 | 10.265 | ||
FE1 | 0.597 | 1.005 | 0.097 | 10.339 | ||
PI1 | 0.687 | 1.000 | 0.411 | 0.736 | ||
PI2 | 0.627 | 0.921 | 0.077 | 11.926 | ||
PI3 | 0.640 | 0.978 | 0.080 | 12.157 | ||
PI4 | 0.609 | 0.864 | 0.074 | 11.603 |
Mean | S.D. | PSI | E | SP | PV | FE | PI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSI | 3.7557 | 0.73258 | 1 | |||||
E | 3.8316 | 0.76597 | 0.665 ** | 1 | ||||
SP | 3.7443 | 0.70679 | 0.701 ** | 0.579 ** | 1 | |||
PV | 3.7352 | 0.75502 | 0.726 ** | 0.624 ** | 0.703 ** | 1 | ||
FE | 3.7303 | 0.72810 | 0.652 ** | 0.598 ** | 0.705 ** | 0.720 ** | 1 | |
PI | 3.7003 | 0.79415 | 0.619 ** | 0.518 ** | 0.673 ** | 0.712 ** | 0.718 ** | 1 |
Hypothesis | Estimate | S.E. | C.R. | p | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 PSI → PV | 0.760 | 0.310 | 2.449 | ** | Supported |
H2 E → PV | −0.590 | 0.225 | −2.623 | ** | Rejected |
H3 SP → PV | 0.956 | 0.223 | 4.278 | *** | Supported |
H4 PSI → FE | −1.288 | 0.467 | −2.761 | ** | Rejected |
H5 E → FE | 0.433 | 0.323 | 1.340 | 0.180 | Rejected |
H6 SP → FE | 1.975 | 0.362 | 5.454 | *** | Supported |
H7 PV → PI | 0.388 | 0.120 | 3.250 | ** | Supported |
H8 FE → PI | 0.731 | 0.146 | 5.013 | *** | Supported |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Cao, A.; Li, Y.; Hong, A. Understanding the Impact of Social, Hedonic, and Promotional Cues on Purchase Intention in Short Video Platforms: A Dual-Path Model for Digital Sustainability. Sustainability 2025, 17, 6894. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156894
Cao A, Li Y, Hong A. Understanding the Impact of Social, Hedonic, and Promotional Cues on Purchase Intention in Short Video Platforms: A Dual-Path Model for Digital Sustainability. Sustainability. 2025; 17(15):6894. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156894
Chicago/Turabian StyleCao, Aonan, Yannan Li, and Ahreum Hong. 2025. "Understanding the Impact of Social, Hedonic, and Promotional Cues on Purchase Intention in Short Video Platforms: A Dual-Path Model for Digital Sustainability" Sustainability 17, no. 15: 6894. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156894
APA StyleCao, A., Li, Y., & Hong, A. (2025). Understanding the Impact of Social, Hedonic, and Promotional Cues on Purchase Intention in Short Video Platforms: A Dual-Path Model for Digital Sustainability. Sustainability, 17(15), 6894. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156894