Next Article in Journal
Extraction of Basic Features and Typical Operating Conditions of Wind Power Generation for Sustainable Energy Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Variability of Summer Drought and Heatwave Events in Northeast China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Winery Residues Transformed into Biochar and Co-Applied with Trichoderma Increase Grape Productivity and Soil Quality
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ecological and Geochemical Characteristics of the Content of Heavy Metals in Steppe Ecosystems of the Akmola Region, Kazakhstan

1
Faculty of Natural Sciences, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
2
NJSC, International Green Technologies and Investment Projects Center, Heydar Aliyev Street, 16, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(14), 6576; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146576
Submission received: 19 May 2025 / Revised: 7 July 2025 / Accepted: 15 July 2025 / Published: 18 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Pollution, Soil Ecology and Sustainable Land Use)

Abstract

Soil quality assessment plays a critical role in promoting sustainable land management, particularly in fragile steppe ecosystems. This study provides a comprehensive geoecological evaluation of heavy metal contamination (Pb, Cd, Zn, Cu, Co, Ni, Fe, and Mn) in soils across five districts of the Akmola region, Kazakhstan. The assessment incorporates multiple integrated pollution indices, including the geochemical pollution index (Igeo), pollution coefficient (CF), ecological risk index (Er), pollution load index (PLI), and integrated pollution index (Zc). Spatial analysis combined with multivariate statistical techniques (PCA and clustering analysis) was used to identify pollutant distribution patterns and differentiate areas by risk levels. The findings reveal generally low to moderate contamination, with cadmium (Cd) posing the highest environmental risk due to its elevated toxic response coefficient, despite its low concentration. The study also explores the connection between current soil conditions and historical land-use changes, particularly those associated with the Virgin Lands Campaign of the mid-20th century. The highest PLI values were recorded in the Yesil and Atbasar districts (7.88 and 7.54, respectively), likely driven by intensive agricultural activity and lithological factors. PCA and cluster analysis revealed distinct spatial groupings, reflecting heterogeneity in both the sources and distribution of soil pollutants.

1. Introduction

Soil is a fundamental component Earth’s ecosystem and a key resource for food production. Its extensive use in agriculture highlights the urgent need for effective protection against pollution to support sustainable development [1,2]. In the context of global urbanization, intensive farming, and land overexploration, soil degradation has emerged as a critical environmental challenge worldwide.
In 2015, the United Nations introduced the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), consisting of 17 global targets designed to shift from exploitative practices toward sustainable solutions addressing issues such as inequality, poverty, and hunger [3,4]. Achieving SDGs related to food security, health, water, and climate places growing pressure on land resources. Preventing land degradation requires an integrated approach, combining sustainable land and water management with transformations in economic systems and societal behavior [1].
Despite its essential role in ecosystems, agriculture, and societal development, soil is increasingly affected by degradation, pollution, and acidification, threatening both ecosystem stability and global food security [5,6,7,8]. Maintaining soil quality has become a key priority for governmental institutions and the scientific community alike [5,6,9].
Previous studies have demonstrated that human activity significantly alters the spatial distribution of heavy metals (HMs) in soils, which subsequently has a negative impact on the sustainable state of ecosystems [10,11,12]. One notable example is the Virgin lands Campaign in mid-20th century Kazakhstan, in particular in the Akmola region: the introduction of intensive agricultural practices, plowing of large areas, and long-term use of fertilizers led to soil degradation, the loss of humus, compaction of the structure, and changes in acidity.
Since 1954, after the dissolution of the Akmola region and its transfer to regional subordination, a large-scale campaign to develop virgin and fallow lands began in the territory. Despite the high rates of economic activity, these transformations led to significant changes in the natural resource potential of steppe ecosystems, increasing the vulnerability of the region to soil degradation processes [13].
Regular use of chemical fertilizers during the development of virgin lands not only increases the content of heavy metals in soils but also changes their bioavailability [14,15,16,17]. During the urbanization of territories, changes in land use are observed, which lead to an increase in the proportion of impermeable coatings, which affects the migration of heavy metals in soils and their distribution in ecosystems [18]. Heavy metals such as lead, cadmium, zinc, and copper can enter the human body through the food chain, which poses a health hazard to both humans and animals [19,20].
Recent studies in Kazakhstan show significant ecological and geochemical risks due to heavy metal (HM) pollution. Zhyrgalova et al. (2024) reported high levels of HM contamination in the Kostanay region, with ecological risk index (RI) values as 447, primarily driven by As, Cd, Pb, and Zn. This corresponds to a “high ecological risk” category [21].
The study by Faurat et al. (2025) considered snow cover in the Pavlodar region as a bioindicator of pollution: the ecological risk index of snow (ERI) has reached 192, and the levels of Zn, Cr, Pb, Cd, Mn, and Mo have exceeded the standards, especially in the industrial and residential areas of the city. These results confirm the presence of spatial heterogeneity of HM pollution across the territory of Kazakhstan, with the highest concentrations in areas of intense anthropogenic load. They highlight the need to apply integrated monitoring and risk assessment methods such as Igeo, Cf, Er, and RI, which is consistent with the methodological model of this study [22].
Despite Kazakhstan’s vast steppe ecosystems and historically low population density, increasing industrial activity and urbanization have contributed to soil contamination by heavy metals. Recent studies highlight regional hotspots of pollution and underline the growing environmental and public health risks posed by these contaminants.
A national soil monitoring campaign between 2010 and 2018 identified elevated concentrations of Pb, Cd, Cu, Zn, and Cr in urban areas, particularly in Balkhash, Ust-Kamenogorsk, Ridder, and Shymkent. The mean values for Pb and Cd in these regions exceeded geoaccumulation thresholds, suggesting significant anthropogenic input and elevated ecological risk. Moreover, the probabilistic risk assessment showed that both adults and children are potentially exposed to hazardous levels of carcinogenic metals [23].
A broader transect-based survey of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) across Kazakhstan’s highway corridors revealed variable distributions of As, Cd, Co, Mn, and Ni. The study found that soil organic carbon and parent material strongly influence the concentration of metals. Arsenic levels were notably elevated in multiple regions, raising environmental concerns. Although Pb levels were not consistently high, Cd, Mn, and Ni reached or exceeded critical thresholds in several locations [24].
Efforts toward ecological restoration have also been reported in industrially disturbed sites, such as the Kokdzhon phosphate mining area in southern Kazakhstan. Restoration experiments using human-transported materials and native vegetation showed low short-term engraftment success, indicating poor soil conditions and the need for long-term bioremediation approaches [25].
These findings collectively underscore the need for sustained monitoring, regulatory oversight, and the development of region-specific soil remediation strategies across Kazakhstan.
Assessing the quality of soil and the geochemical characteristics of heavy metals in agricultural lands is an important step in the analysis of environmental risks and the development of effective soil resource management methods [26].
This study analyzes the geochemical characteristics of heavy metals in soils of the Akmola region (Atbasar, Egindykol, Ereymentau, Yesil, and Akkol districts) in order to conduct an ecological and geochemical assessment of the steppe ecosystems of the region. The concentrations of eight heavy metals in soils, which are indicators for assessing the environmental risk on agricultural lands, were studied. The environmental risk of soil pollution is assessed taking into account international and Kazakhstani environmental quality standards for soils. The results of the study are aimed at improving land-use methods and optimizing agricultural production planning, which will help ensure the safety of agricultural products while minimizing environmental risks. The purpose of this study is to conduct an ecological and geochemical assessment of the steppe ecosystems of the Akmola region with an emphasis on the geochemical characteristics of heavy metals in soils, which will help assess the degree of pollution of agricultural lands and identify the environmental risk to the environment. The main focus is on studying the concentration of heavy metals in the upper soil layer to assess their impact on the regional ecosystem, which will allow for the formation of well-founded recommendations for sustainable development of land resources and minimization of environmental impact in agriculture.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Characteristics of the Districts

The study was conducted in five administrative districts of the Akmola region: Atbasar, Akkol, Egindykol, Ereymentau, and Yesil. These districts were selected due to their high agricultural relevance and diverse ecological settings. The locations of the sampled areas are shown in Figure 1, with each district clearly delineated on the updated regional map.
The Akmola region is located in north-central Kazakhstan, covering an area of 146,200 km2. It forms part of the Kazakh Uplands (Saryarka) and the Tengiz Depression, characterized by undulating hills, low mountains, and extensive plains. The region includes 17 administrative districts, the cities of Kokshetau and Stepnogorsk, and the capital city, Astana [27,28].
The total land fund comprises 146,122 km2, with approximately 74% (107,840 km2) allocated for agricultural use [29]. The selected districts encompass a variety of land-use types: arable lands, natural pastures, hayfields, and fallow plots.
The climate of the Akmola region is sharply continental, characterized by cold winters and hot summers. The average temperature in January is approximately −11.9 °C, while in July it reaches around +20.1 °C. The region receives annual precipitation ranging from 400 to 500 mm, and snow cover persists for up to 150 days per year.
Soil types in the selected districts include chernozems, dark chestnut, carbonate, solonetzic, and meadow soils [30,31].

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Collection and Preparation of Soil Samples

Fieldwork was conducted in five administrative districts of the Akmola region: Atbasar, Egindykol, Ereymentau, Yesil, and Akkol. A total of 60 composite soil samples were collected, evenly distributed across the study area. Sampling was performed in accordance with ISO 10381-4:2003, using a stratified sampling strategy that considered topographic variability and land-use patterns. The sampling depth was 0–20 cm for arable soils and 0–10 cm for virgin soils, and multilayered sampling was conducted horizon by horizon where applicable. Composite samples were formed from multiple subsamples, air-dried at room temperature, sieved through a 2 mm mesh, and stored in sealed containers prior to analysis.

2.2.2. Determination of Heavy Metal Concentrations

The total concentrations of heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Zn, Cu, Co, Ni, Fe, and Mn) were determined by acid digestion using a mixture of HNO3, HF, and HClO4, following the national PND F 16.1:2.3:3.11–98 [32]. The analytical procedure adhered to ISO 11047:1998 [33] for the determination of trace elements in soils. Analyses were performed using atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) on an Analyst 400 instrument (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Quality control included certified reference materials, repeated measurements, blank samples, and calibration curves with correlation coefficients R2 > 0.995. Detection limits ranged from 0.001 to 0.01 mg/kg depending on the element.

2.3. Data Processing

This section describes the statistical and index-based approaches applied to evaluate HM contamination and ecological risk in soils. All HM concentrations are reported on a dry weight basis, ensuring comparability by excluding moisture-related variability.

2.3.1. Background Values and Environmental Risk Indices

Background concentrations of heavy metals were estimated using a statistical approach based on the methodology proposed by Hakanson (1980) [34]. Median values were calculated from the dataset, and outliers were excluded based on the interquartile range (IQR) method. These values served as the baseline for calculating geochemical and ecological indices, including the geoaccumulation index (Igeo), contamination factor (CF), ecological risk index (Er), comprehensive ecological risk index (RI), and the pollution index (Zc).
Background concentrations of heavy metals were determined by a statistical method based on empirical data for each region. The calculation of background concentrations was performed:
B n = x ¯ + σ
where x ¯   is the average content of the element in the soil (mg/kg), and σ is the standard deviation of the sample [34].

2.3.2. Contamination and Risk Indices

The geochemical pollution index (Igeo) assesses the degree of anthropogenic impact relative to natural background levels:
I g o = log 2 C n 1.5 B n
where C n is the concentration of the substance in the soil (mg/kg); B n is the background value of the element; and the constant 1.5 is a correction factor to account for possible variations in background data [35].
The pollution factor (CF) quantifies the extent of contamination:
C F = C n B n
The ecological risk index (Er) evaluates potential ecological risk based on contamination and toxicity:
E r = T r C n B n
where T r the toxic response factor (e.g., Cd = 30, Pb = 5, Cu = 5, and Zn = 1) [34].
The pollution load index (PLI) is:
P L I = C F 1 · C F 2 · · C F n n
where n—the number of elements analyzed [34,35,36,37,38,39,40].
The integral pollution index, Zc, shows the total excess of background concentrations of all analyzed elements [41]:
Z c = C F i   1

2.3.3. Diagrams

Data visualization and statistical analysis were performed using the Python programming language (v3.10). Comparative diagrams, heatmaps, and principal component analysis (PCA) plots were generated using the libraries Matplotlib (v3.7.1), Seaborn (v0.12.2), Pandas (v1.5.3), NumPy (v1.24.2), and scikit-learn (v1.2.2). Raw data were pre-processed and organized into structured tables to facilitate visualization and statistical interpretation. PCA was applied to identify spatial patterns in heavy metal concentrations and to group the study districts based on similarity in geochemical profiles.
Support and the interpretation of PCA and clustering results were partially assisted by ChatGPT (OpenAI, GPT-4, 2025), which was used for refining data descriptions, summarizing trends, and drafting manuscript preparation. However, all computational analysis and figure generation were performed using reproducible Python scripts.

2.3.4. Maps

Geospatial analysis was conducted in ArcGIS 10.8 and georeferenced using WGS 84, UTM Zone 42N. Thematic features (soils, agroclimatic zones, and vegetation) were digitized with attribute tables. Elevation data from SRTM supported relief modeling. The NDVI and productivity indices were used to assess land productivity using Landsat images. Maps of virgin land development were created based on historical and current data with visualization of changes in Layout View. The final materials were exported in PDF and JPEG formats (scale 1:1,000,000). The methods used make it possible to identify spatial patterns of soil cover changes and monitor land degradation and restoration processes.

3. Results

The historical transformation of land use shown in Figure 2 provides critical insight into the agroecological changes that have shaped soil conditions in the Akmola region. The Virgin Lands Campaign (1954–1961) was a large-scale Soviet agricultural project that led to the plowing of vast steppe areas, including natural pastures and hayfields, primarily on fertile chernozem and chestnut soils.
This transformation had several long-term consequences for soil quality and pollution.
Loss of soil structure and organic matter: The rapid conversion of natural grasslands into croplands disrupted native soil horizons and led to a decline in humus content, which plays a key role in buffering heavy metals.
Increased agrochemical input: The newly cultivated lands were intensively managed using mineral fertilizers, pesticides, and mechanization, which, over decades, contributed to the accumulation of heavy metals (HMs) such as cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn).
Geographical correlation with HM indices: Many of the zones highlighted in Figure 2 as having been brought under cultivation during the campaign (e.g., Atbasar, Yesil, and Ereymentau districts) coincided with areas that demonstrated elevated values of CF, PLI, and RI in this study. This suggests a direct link between historical land conversion and current geochemical burdens.
Soil type vulnerability: Chernozem and chestnut soils, while agriculturally productive, are known to retain certain heavy metals in the topsoil, especially when organic matter is depleted, and their buffering capacity reduced.
Thus, Figure 2 is essential for contextualizing the spatial patterns of soil pollution observed in this study. It supports the hypothesis that historical land-use intensity, particularly during the mid-20th century, played a major role in shaping current HM contamination levels. This also underscores the importance of considering legacy agricultural practices when designing modern strategies for sustainable land and soil management.
The map illustrates the spatial extent of arable land prior to 1953 and areas cultivated between 1954 and 1961 during the Virgin Lands Campaign. Pastures and hayfields are shown in green, with the soil types indicated (1—common and southern chernozems; 2—dark chestnut and chestnut soils). These land-use transformations contributed to long-term changes in soil properties and set the foundation for heavy metal accumulation observed in the study area.
Heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Zn, Cu, Co, Ni, Fe, and Mn) were analyzed in the soils of five administrative districts: Atbasar, Akkol, Egindikol, Ereymentau, and Yesil.
Table 1 presents descriptive statistics and calculated ecological indices, including the average concentration, standard deviation, coefficient of variation (CV), background concentration, geoaccumulation index (Igeo), environmental risk factor (Er), contamination factor (CF), pollution load index (PLI), and integrated pollution index (Zc) [36,37,38,39].
These indicators were selected to provide a multidimensional assessment of soil contamination. While Igeo characterizes the extent of anthropogenic enrichment relative to natural background levels, CF quantifies local contamination intensity. Er incorporates the toxic potential of each metal. PLI and Zc help identify zones with elevated overall pollution pressure. Together, these metrics allow for a nuanced interpretation of spatial differences and inform soil quality status in the context of sustainable land management.

3.1. Pollution Load Index (PLI) Distribution

Figure 3 presents a comparative diagram of the pollution load index (PLI) values across the five studied districts of the Akmola region. This index serves as an integrated measure of overall soil pollution with heavy metals. According to Hakanson’s classification, PLI values greater than 1 indicate contamination levels that exceed natural background values [34].
The highest PLI value was recorded in the Yesil district (7.880), followed by Atbasar (7.546) and Akkol (7.224). The Egindikol and Ereymentau districts exhibited lower PLI values of 5.151 and 4.937, respectively. All five districts demonstrated PLI values above 1, confirming heavy metal pollution relative to the background.

3.2. Ecological Risk and Geochemical Indices

Cadmium (Cd) in the Yesil district showed the highest ecological risk index (Er = 30.000), despite its relatively low concentration, due to its high toxic response factor. As shown in Table 2, the median Igeo values for all metals fell within the range of −0.152 to 0.125, which, according to Hakanson’s scale, corresponds to the classification of “unpolluted” to “slightly polluted” soils.
Contamination factors (CFs) for all elements were below 1, indicating minimal anthropogenic enrichment. Additionally, the integrated pollution index (Zc) yielded negative values across all districts, suggesting no significant cumulative pollution relative to background concentrations. Note that negative values of Igeo and Zc in Table 1 reflect concentrations below background levels and should not be confused with typographical hyphens. These are valid outcomes of the log-transformed or differential-based index formulas used for environmental assessment.

3.3. Correlation Analysis

Correlation analysis, visualized in the heatmap (Figure 4), revealed both positive and negative associations among heavy metals. A strong negative correlation was found between Pb and Cu (r = −0.77) and between Cd and Co (r = –0.66). Additionally, a strong negative correlation was also found between Mn and Cu (r = −0.66), which may reflect contrasting geochemical behaviors or competitive retention in soil minerals. In contrast, Co and Mn exhibited a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.67).

3.4. Cluster and Principal Component Analysis

Figure 5 displays (a) a dendrogram based on hierarchical clustering and (b) principal component analysis (PCA) followed by K-means clustering. These analyzes classified the five districts into clusters based on similarities in heavy metal concentrations. Yesil is now represented as a single unified district.

3.5. Integrated Pollution Profiles

Radar diagrams in Figure 6 display normalized median values for the Igeo, CF, and Er indices across all elements and districts. These profiles help visualize multi-metal contamination trends and identify districts with elevated ecological risks.
Overall, the study revealed that although all districts exhibit pollution exceeding background levels (PLI > 1), the magnitude and composition of contamination vary. The Yesil, Atbasar, and Akkol districts show the highest cumulative burden, driven in part by cadmium, which consistently displayed the highest ecological risk. The use of multiple indicators—such as PLI, Igeo, Er, and CF—provided a multidimensional view of contamination levels and sources, facilitating robust ecological interpretation. These findings offer a basis for prioritizing remediation or monitoring strategies across different districts in line with sustainable land management goals.

4. Discussion

4.1. Interpretation of Pollution Indices

To assess the ecological and geochemical state of soils in the Akmola region, several standardized indices were employed. These indicators are widely used to quantify contamination levels, potential risks, and anthropogenic impacts on the environment:
The geoaccumulation index (Igeo), proposed by Müller (1979), classifies soil pollution based on the deviation from natural background concentrations. It includes the following categories: ≤0 (unpolluted), 0–1 (slightly polluted), 1–2 (moderately polluted), 2–3 (heavily polluted), 3–4 (very heavily polluted), and >5 (extremely polluted) [35].
The ecological risk index (Er), introduced by Hakanson (1980), estimates the potential environmental impact of heavy metals, factoring both concentration and toxicity. Values < 40 indicate low risk, 40–80 medium, 80–160 significant, and >160 high ecological risk [34].
The contamination factor (CF) describes the degree of contamination relative to background levels. A CF < 1 suggests low contamination, 1–3 moderate, 3–6 significant, and >6 very high pollution [40].
The pollution load index (PLI) is an integrated indicator summarizing overall soil contamination. A value of PLI = 1 reflects baseline levels, PLI < 1 indicates clean soil, and PLI > 1 denotes contaminated conditions [38].
The integrated pollution index (Zc) reflects the total pollution load in a region. Values < 16 suggest permissible pollution, 16–32 moderate pollution, and ≥32 indicate hazardous levels [41].
The pollution load index (PLI) values indicated that soils in all districts experienced pollution above background levels, with the highest levels recorded in the Yesil, Atbasar, and Akkol districts. These values reflect a significant technogenic impact, which may be associated with intensive land use, fertilizer application, or proximity to transportation infrastructure. These regions were heavily involved in agricultural expansion during the Virgin Lands Campaign, supporting the hypothesis that historical land use significantly contributed to heavy metal (HM) accumulation [34].
The high PLI values observed in the Atbasar and Yesil districts suggest the influence of similar pollution factors, both natural and anthropogenic. This may be linked to intensive agricultural activities and the natural geochemical background enriched with elements such as Ni, Cu, and Zn [42,43].
The Akkol district demonstrated an average PLI value of 7.224, indicating a moderate pollution level. Elevated concentrations of Co and Mn may reflect the natural geochemical heterogeneity of the parent rock or the influence of agrochemical inputs. Although the PLI value exceeds the threshold, it does so to a relatively lesser extent. Lower concentrations of Cu and Pb in this district may be explained by reduced anthropogenic pressure or specific features of the soil profile (Table 2) [44].

4.2. Spatial Patterns of Heavy Metal Contamination

Ecological and geochemical assessment of the steppe soils in the Akmola region reveals spatial differences in pollution patterns and ecological risks from heavy metal (HM) contamination.
The analysis of HM content (Pb, Cd, Zn, Cu, Co, Ni, Fe, and Mn) showed that overall contamination levels are relatively low. According to the median values of the geochemical pollution index (Igeo), pollution levels fall within the range of ≤0 to 0.07, indicating a status of “unpolluted” to “slightly polluted” (Table 3). This classification is based on Müller’s scale for Igeo values [35].
The ecological risk index (Er) showed that cadmium poses the highest environmental hazard (Er = 22.788), despite its low absolute concentration. This is due to Cd’s high toxicological coefficient and mobility in the soil environment. Although classified as a “low risk” (Er < 40), cadmium still warrants close attention.
All other elements had Er values below 40, placing them within the “low ecological risk” category (Table 4), as defined by Hakanson’s classification [34].
All other elements exhibited Er values below 40, corresponding to a low ecological risk category (Table 4).
The contamination factor (CF) values for all investigated elements were less than 1, indicating only minor pollution levels. According to the classification scale [35], CF values < 1 represent low contamination, which is consistent with predominantly lithogenic sources of heavy metals and minimal anthropogenic influence (Table 5).
The pollution load index (PLI) ranged from 4.937 to 7.880 across districts, significantly exceeding the threshold value of 1, which indicates pollution above background levels. This confirms cumulative soil contamination, especially in the Yesil, Atbasar, and Akkol districts, where agricultural intensification and historical land use are likely contributors. These results align with the PLI classification scale proposed by Tomlinson et al. [40] (Table 6).
Despite high PLI values, the integral pollution index (Zc) showed negative values for all districts. This suggests that, when considering the total load relative to background concentrations, there is no severe exceedance, and the soils remain within permissible pollution levels (Zc < 16) (Table 7), based on standards used in ecological risk assessment studies [40].
Overall, the results indicate that the steppe soils of the Akmola region are in a conditionally stable ecological state, although localized pollution is observed, primarily associated with cadmium content. Continued monitoring is necessary, especially regarding cadmium and lead concentrations.

4.3. Inter-Element Correlations and Cluster Structure

To explore inter-element relationships, a heatmap was constructed to display correlations between the concentrations of HMs in the soil. Correlation coefficient ranged from +1 to −1, with a value of 0 indicating no linear relationships. Correlation analysis of heavy metals in the Akmola region revealed both positive and negative relationships between the elements. The discrepancy between these values shows the heterogeneity of their origin, behavior in the soil environment, and possible sources of entry.
The most pronounced negative correlation (Figure 4) was observed between Pb and Cu, suggesting an inverse proportionality: areas with elevated Pb levels tend show reduced Cu concentration. This may reflect a difference in their sources: lead is associated with anthropogenic pollution, particularly from transportation [45,46,47], while Cu is more likely of geogenic origin, influenced by the use of copper-containing fertilizers.
A strong negative correlation was also found between Cd and Co, with r = −0.66, where higher cadmium concentrations corresponded with lower Co levels. This may be attributed to competitive sorption processes or variation in geochemical environments, where one element displaces the other within the soil profile. Similar trends have been observed noted in other steppe and industrial regions [48].
In contrast, Co and Mn displayed a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.67), which may indicate a shared lithogenic origin or joint migration behavior, as both are common constituents of mafic and ultramafic rocks and oxides in soil [44].

4.4. Integrated Risk Visualization Using Radar Plots

Multivariate statistical techniques were used to identify patterns in the distribution of heavy metals across the Akmola region. The dendrogram (Figure 5a) and PCA biplot (Figure 5b) revealed spatially coherent clusters based on similarities in metal concentration profiles.
The hierarchical clustering analysis separated the five districts into three main groups:
Akkol and Ereymentau were grouped together in the first cluster, indicating similar contamination profiles. This cluster was characterized by moderate levels of Mn and Co, which likely reflect shared lithological backgrounds and agrochemical inputs. Such grouping has been associated with moderately altered soils due to mixed geogenic and anthropogenic sources [40,41,44,49].
Atbasar and Yesil formed the second cluster, reflecting relatively high concentrations of Cu, Ni, and Zn. Their close proximity in the dendrogram suggests a common geochemical environment and intensive land-use histories. This aligns with areas affected by the Virgin Lands Campaign, where long-term cultivation and fertilization practices have contributed to the accumulation of metals [38].
Egindikol stood apart as a distinct cluster. The PCA analysis showed it projecting separately along the PC2 axis, suggesting a unique metal distribution pattern, particularly due to elevated levels of Cd and Mn. This pattern may reflect specific local factors such as lithology or unique agro-technical practices [34,35].
The PCA analysis supported these groupings, with PC1 (44.1%) and PC2 (29.0%) accounting for a combined 73.1% of the total variance. The spatial separation observed confirms the heterogeneity of metal sources and behaviors across the region.
These results offer a scientifically grounded basis for regional monitoring: areas like Egindikol may require more targeted ecological risk assessment, while Atbasar and Yesil demonstrate cumulative impacts likely associated with long-term anthropogenic activity. Multivariate analysis thus complements traditional indices (Igeo, CF, Er, PLI, and Zc) and enhances spatial understanding of pollution dynamics.
In the dendrogram. the Egindikol and Akkol districts formed a stable cluster at the lowest Euclidean distance. indicating a high degree of similarity in their HM contamination profile. This is likely due to the similar soil-forming parent materials and comparable anthropogenic inputs. particularly from agriculture [45]. Both districts exhibited elevated concentrations of Mn and Cd suggested common pollution sources [46].
The Ereymentau district clustered next with Egindikol and Akkol, reflecting a moderate level of similarity. The concentrations of Co and Pb indicate an intermediate nature of pollution, which allows us to consider Ereymentau as a transition zone between groups with different levels of anthropogenic impact [43].
A separate cluster comprised the Yesil and Atbasar districts, which showed similar concentrations of Zn, Ni, and Cu. This may be due to the geochemical homogeneity of soils and similar natural background conditions, as well as comparable forms of land use [50].
The PCA results supported these clustering results. The Atbasar and Yesil districts grouped closely the PC1–PC2 space. while Akkol and Ereymentau also showed proximity, reflecting similar derivations in Mn and Cd. The Egindykol district demonstrates as a distinct outlier along the PC2 axis, indicating a unique pollution profile.
Combined PCA and hierarchical clustering successfully identified spatially coherent groups with differing pollution levels and compositions. The principal component analysis allowed us to identify zones of the greatest dispersion and visualize the main directions of differences. The results obtained can be effectively applied to substantiate priority zones for environmental monitoring and to plan soil remediation activities [46].
Figure 6 presents a radar diagram displaying the normalized median values of the geochemical pollution index (Igeo), the contamination factor (CF), and the ecological risk index (Er) for HMs in Akmola region soils.
Cd demonstrates the highest value of ecological risk. However, the average value of cadmium concentration is low, which is due to its extremely high toxicological coefficient (30) and high mobility in the soil environment. Such indicators confirm the data of previous studies, in which Cd is classified as one of the most dangerous soil pollutants, even at minimal concentrations [34,47].
The radar diagram (Figure 6) provides a comprehensive visualization of the normalized median values of three key indices—the geochemical index (Igeo), contamination factor (CF), and ecological risk index (Er)—for each heavy metal across the studied districts. This representation highlights the relative behavior of individual elements and their contribution to ecological risk.
Cadmium (Cd) exhibits the highest value for the ecological risk index (Er), despite its low average concentration. This reflects its extremely high toxicological response factor (Tr = 30), high bioavailability, and mobility in the soil. These characteristics make Cd a priority pollutant in environmental monitoring, as even trace concentrations can pose significant ecological risks. Similar findings have been reported in other steppe regions, supporting Cd’s classification as one of the most hazardous soil contaminants [34,47].
Co, Ni, and Fe show elevated Igeo and CF values, suggesting geogenic sources due to the composition of soil-forming rocks in the Akmola region [40,48]. However, their Er values remain low, indicating that their ecological threat is limited under current conditions. These elements are typically less mobile and often form stable complexes in slightly alkaline and carbonate-rich soils.
Pb demonstrates moderate values for both Igeo and CF, implying notable anthropogenic input, likely from vehicular emissions and industrial activities. Yet, its Er remains within a moderate range, due to the relatively low solubility and mobility of Pb in carbonate soils [51,52,53].
Cu and Zn present balanced values across all three indices. Their presence in the soil likely results from a combination of natural mineral weathering and anthropogenic contributions, such as the use of fertilizers and pesticides. Their ecological impact depends largely on their chemical form and bioavailability [54,55].
Mn is characterized by consistent, moderate index values, suggesting a stable geochemical behavior. It is an essential micronutrient and is primarily lithogenic in origin in the study area, with accumulation patterns strongly influenced by the mineral composition of parent rocks [56].
Overall, the radar diagram illustrates that while most elements are within acceptable geochemical and ecological risk thresholds, cadmium remains a standout risk factor. The integration of multiple indicators helps identify priority areas and pollutants for remediation and future monitoring.

4.5. Conclusion to Discussion

The integrated analysis of geochemical and ecological indices confirms that the steppe soils of the Akmola region are exposed to varying levels of anthropogenic and natural heavy metal inputs. Although the pollution load index (PLI) values exceed the background threshold in all districts, the low values of the ecological risk index (Er) and contamination factor (CF) and the negative values of the integrated pollution index (Zc) indicate that overall contamination remains within acceptable ecological limits. Cadmium stands out as the primary risk element due to its high toxicity and mobility, despite its low concentrations.
Spatial and statistical analyses, including correlation matrices, hierarchical clustering, and principal component analysis (PCA), reveal distinct contamination profiles and geochemical patterns among districts. These findings support the need for targeted monitoring—particularly in Yesil, Atbasar, and Egindikol—where localized pollution or distinct geochemical signatures suggest potential hotspots for environmental risk.
This multi-index approach provides a comprehensive framework for assessing soil quality and can inform future environmental management strategies, including the prioritization of remediation areas and sustainable land-use planning.

5. Conclusions

This study presents a comprehensive environmental assessment of heavy metal pollution in steppe soils of the Akmola region using pollution indices and multivariate statistical methods. The results revealed spatial variability of pollution levels in six districts. with the highest pollution load index (PLI) values observed in the Yesil and Atbasar districts. Cadmium (Cd), despite its low concentration, was identified as the most environmentally hazardous element due to its high toxicological coefficient. highlighting the importance of considering element-related risks when assessing environmental conditions.
The combination of the Igeo, CF, Er, PLI, and Zc indices, along with PCA and cluster analysis, allowed for the identification of both natural and anthropogenic sources of pollution. The classification of areas into distinct clusters based on pollution profiles provides a practical basis for soil management and site-specific policy interventions.
The results of the study showed a relationship between the spatial distribution of pollution and the historical development of virgin lands. The highest pollution values are observed in areas actively involved in agricultural turnover during the Virgin Lands Development Campaign. The data obtained show a significant impact of intensive agricultural exploitation on the ecological state of soils. This emphasizes the need to integrate historical and geographical analyses into environmental monitoring and decision making on sustainable land management.
The results highlight the need for targeted soil monitoring programs in regions with intensive agricultural activities and demonstrate the usefulness of integrated assessment tools to support sustainable land-use planning. Further research should focus on metal bioavailability, their transport to crops, and long-term ecological impacts to develop land restoration strategies and ensure food security in semi-arid ecosystems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.Y.; Data curation, A.G., S.K., B.A. and D.A.; Formal analysis, G.G.; Investigation, A.S. and B.A.; Methodology, G.G., M.Y., A.N. and B.Z.; Resources, A.S.; Validation, A.G.; Visualization, B.Z. and S.K.; Writing—original draft, G.G., A.N. and M.Y.; Writing—review and editing, B.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was carried out as part of a scientific project for grant funding and was funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (AR23485030).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the use of ChatGPT-4 (OpenAI, 2025) for assistance in graphical data visualization, specifically through Python-based tools in the ChatGPT environment. All results, interpretations, and textual content were critically reviewed and finalized by the authors, who take full responsibility for the scientific accuracy and integrity of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Almurzaeva Saltanat was employed by the company NJSC, International Green Technologies and Investment Projects Center. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Keesstra, S.; Mol, G.; De Leeuw, J.; Okx, J.; Molenaar, C.; De Cleen, M.; Visser, S. Soil-Related Sustainable Development Goals: Four Concepts to Make Land Degradation Neutrality and Restoration Work. Land 2018, 7, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Solomun, M.K.; Barger, N.; Cerda, A.; Keesstra, S.; Marković, M. Assessing Land Condition as a First Step to Achieving Land Degradation Neutrality: A Case Study of the Republic of Srpska. Environ. Sci. Policy 2018, 90, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Griggs, D.; Stafford-Smith, M.; Gaffney, O.; Rockström, J.; Öhman, M.C.; Shyamsundar, P.; Teffen, W.; Glaser, G.; Kanie, N.; Noble, I. Sustainable Development Goals for People and Planet. Nature 2013, 495, 305–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Steffen, W.; Richardson, K.; Rockström, J.; Cornell, S.E.; Fetzer, I.; Bennett, E.M.; Biggs, R.; Carpenter, S.R.; De Vries, W.; De Wit, C.A.; et al. Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet. Science 2015, 347, 1259855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fierer, N.; Wood, S.A.; Bueno de Mesquita, C.P. How Microbes Can, and Cannot, Be Used to Assess Soil Health. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2021, 153, 108111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Daliakopoulos, I.N.; Tsanis, I.K.; Koutroulis, A.; Kourgialas, N.N.; Varouchakis, A.E.; Karatzas, G.P.; Ritsema, C.J. The Threat of Soil Salinity: A European Scale Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 573, 727–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lwin, C.S.; Seo, B.-H.; Kim, H.-U.; Owens, G.; Kim, K.-R. Application of Soil Amendments to Contaminated Soils for Heavy Metal Immobilization and Improved Soil Quality—A Critical Review. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2018, 64, 156–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Song, W.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, R.; Wu, K.; Li, X.; Niu, B.; Li, J. Study on Cultivated Land Quality Evaluation from the Perspective of Farmland Ecosystems. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 139, 108959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nawaz, M.F.; Bourrié, G.; Trolard, F. Soil Compaction Impact and Modelling: A Review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2013, 33, 291–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ahmadi, M.; Akhbarizadeh, R.; Haghighifard, N.J.; Barzegar, G.; Jorfi, S. Geochemical Determination and Pollution Assessment of Heavy Metals in Agricultural Soils of Southwestern Iran. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2019, 17, 657–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Łukaszek-Chmielewska, A.; Rakowska, J.; Rachwał, M.; Stawarz, O.; Kozłowski, E.; Wiśniewska, K.; Dąbrowski, M.; Gąsiorek, M. Assessment of Forest Soil Contamination by Heavy Metals in the Polish National Park near Warsaw. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 4099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zharlygassov, Z.; Kalimov, N.; Ansabayeva, A.; Zharlygassov, Z.; Iskakov, B.; Sarsembayev, D.; Tynybekova, G.; Zhanabayev, R. Sustainable Nutrient Management and Agricultural Productivity in Chernozem Soils of the Kostanay Region, Kazakhstan. Eurasian J. Soil Sci. 2025, 14, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tselinnyy Kray iz Pyati Oblastey. Nasha Gazeta. Available online: https://www.ng.kz/modules/newspaper/article.php?numberid=257&storyid=16279 (accessed on 11 April 2025).
  14. Ali, H.; Khan, E.; Ilahi, I. Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology of Hazardous Heavy Metals: Environmental Persistence, Toxicity, and Bioaccumulation. J. Chem. 2019, 2019, 6730305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jiao, W.; Chen, W.; Chang, A.C.; Page, A.L. Environmental Risks of Trace Elements Associated with Long-Term Phosphate Fertilizer Applications: A Review. Environ. Pollut. 2012, 168, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, T.; Tan, C.; Cao, X.; Ouyang, D.; Nie, J.; Wang, B.; Liang, Y. Effects of Long-Term Fertilization on the Accumulation and Availability of Heavy Metals in Soil. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 2017, 36, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pan, Q.; Yang, J.; Teng, Y.; Wang, J. Bioavailability of Heavy Metals in Different Chemical Fertilizers under Simulated Acid Rain. J. Beijing Norm. Univ. 2016, 52, 597–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tedoldi, D.; Chebbo, G.; Pierlot, D.; Branchu, P.; Kovacs, Y.; Gromaire, M.C. Spatial Distribution of Heavy Metals in the Surface Soil of Source-Control Stormwater Infiltration Devices–Inter-Site Comparison. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 579, 881–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jallad, K.N. Heavy Metal Exposure from Ingesting Rice and Its Related Potential Hazardous Health Risks to Humans. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 15449–15458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kinuthia, G.K.; Ngure, V.; Beti, D.; Lugalia, R.; Wangila, A.; Kamau, L. Levels of Heavy Metals in Wastewater and Soil Samples from Open Drainage Channels in Nairobi, Kenya: Community Health Implication. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 8434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhyrgalova, A.; Yelemessov, S.; Ablaikhan, B.; Aitkhozhayeva, G.; Zhildikbayeva, A. Assessment of Potential Ecological Risk of Heavy Metal Contamination of Agricultural Soils in Kazakhstan. Braz. J. Biol. 2024, 84, e280583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Faurat, A.; Yessimova, D.; Satybaldiyeva, G.; Kuatbayev, A.; Utarbayeva, A.; Kaliyeva, A.; Akhmetov, K.; Khan, S.M.; Ahmad, Z.; Rakhmanov, S. Assessing the Spatial Distribution and Sources of Heavy Metal Pollution in the Snow Cover: A Case Study from Pavlodar, Northeastern Kazakhstan. PLoS ONE 2025, 20, e0322300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ramazanova, E.; Lee, S.H.; Lee, W. Stochastic Risk Assessment of Urban Soils Contaminated by Heavy Metals in Kazakhstan. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 750, 141535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Guney, M.; Yagofarova, A.; Yapiyev, V.; Schönbach, C.; Kim, J.R.; Inglezakis, V.J. Distribution of Potentially Toxic Soil Elements along a Transect across Kazakhstan. Geoderma Reg. 2020, 21, e00281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Toktar, M.; Lo Papa, G.; Kozybayeva, F.E.; Dazzi, C. Ecological Restoration in Contaminated Soils of Kokdzhon Phosphate Mining Area (Zhambyl Region, Kazakhstan). Ecol. Eng. 2016, 86, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Albanese, S.; De Vivo, B.; Lima, A.; Cicchella, D. Geochemical Background and Baseline Values of Toxic Elements in Stream Sediments of Campania Region (Italy). J. Geochem. Explor. 2007, 93, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhakyp, B. Akmolinskaya Oblast’: Entsiklopediya; TOO “Qazaq Entsiklopediyasy”: Almaty, Kazakhstan, 2009; p. 520. [Google Scholar]
  28. Baysholanov, S. (Ed.) Agroklimaticheskie Resursy Akmolinskoy Oblasti: Nauchno-Prikladnoy Spravochnik; TOO “Institut Geografii”: Astana, Kazakhstan, 2017; p. 133. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mendybayev, E.H.; Gataulina, G.A.; Beketova, A.T. Historical and Geographical Factors Influencing the Formation of the Soil Cover of the Akmola Region. In Proceedings of the International Conference “Global Challenges for Global Science IV”, Bursa, Turkey, 3 November 2024; pp. 221–225. [Google Scholar]
  30. Salikhov, T.K.; Salikhova, T.S. Study of the Soil Cover of the Atbasar District of the Akmola Region Using GIS Technologies. Bull. Natl. Nucl. Cent. Repub. Kazakhstan 2019, 1, 34–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Klebanovich, N.V.; Efimova, I.A.; Prokopovich, S.N. Soils and Land Resources of Kazakhstan: Study Materials for Students in the Specialty “Geoinformation Systems”; Belarusian State University: Minsk, Belarus, 2016; p. 46. [Google Scholar]
  32. ND F 16.1:2.3:3.11–98; Quantitative Chemical Analysis of Soils. Methodology for Measuring Metal Content in Solid Objects by Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS). Federal Committee for Standards: Moscow, Russia, 1998.
  33. ISO 11047:1998; Soil Quality—Determination of Cadmium, Chromium, Cobalt, Copper, Lead, Manganese, Nickel and Zinc—Flame and Electrothermal Atomic Absorption Spectrometric Methods. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): Geneva, Switzerland, 1998.
  34. Hakanson, L. An Ecological Risk Index for Aquatic Pollution Control: A Sedimentological Approach. Water Res. 1980, 14, 975–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Müller, G. Schwermetalle in den Sedimenten des Rheins—Veränderungen seit 1971. Umschau 1979, 79, 778–783. [Google Scholar]
  36. Nurkassimova, M.; Omarova, N.; Yushin, N.; Smagulova, Z.; Samat, A.; Iskakova, G.; Tursynbekova, A.; Sagintayeva, A. Assessment of Air Pollution in South Kazakhstan Using Moss (Hylocomium splendens) Biomonitoring Technique and Neutron Activation Analysis. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2024, 333, 4367–4376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Matschullat, J.; Ottenstein, R.; Reimann, C. Geochemical Background—Can We Calculate It? Environ. Geol. 2000, 39, 990–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tomlinson, D.L.; Wilson, J.G.; Harris, C.R.; Jeffrey, D.W. Problems in the Assessment of Heavy-Metal Levels in Estuaries and the Formation of a Pollution Index. Helgol. Meeresunters. 1980, 33, 566–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nurkassimova, M.; Omarova, N.; Zinicovscaia, I.; Chaligava, O.; Yushin, N. Mosses as Bioindicators of Air Pollution with Potentially Toxic Elements in Areas with Different Levels of Anthropogenic Load in the Karaganda Region, Kazakhstan. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2024, 333, 961–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Soliman, N.F.; Nasr, S.M.; Okbah, M.A. Potential Ecological Risk of Heavy Metals in Sediments from the Mediterranean Coast, Egypt. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2015, 13, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Malik, R.N.; Jadoon, W.A.; Husain, S.Z. Metal Contamination of Surface Soils of Industrial City Sialkot, Pakistan: A Multivariate and GIS Approach. Environ. Geochem. Health 2010, 32, 179–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gao, Z.; Dong, H.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Jiang, B.; Liu, Y. Geochemical Characteristics and Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Surface Soil of Gaomi City. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Alloway, B.J. Heavy Metals in Soils: Trace Metals and Metalloids in Soils and Their Bioavailability; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, J.; Liu, C.L. Riverine Composition and Estuarine Geochemistry of Particulate Metals in China—Weathering Features, Anthropogenic Impact, and Chemical Fluxes. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2002, 54, 1051–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kabata-Pendias, A.; Pendias, H. Trace Elements in Soils and Plants, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Caeiro, S.; Costa, M.H.; Ramos, T.B.; Fernandes, F.; Silveira, N.; Coimbra, A.; Medeiros, G.; Painho, M. Assessing Heavy Metal Contamination in Sado Estuary Sediment: An Index Analysis Approach. Ecol. Indic. 2005, 5, 151–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kabata-Pendias, A. Trace Elements in Soils and Plants, 4th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mandal, A.; Singh, N. Heavy Metal Contamination of Agricultural Soils Due to Sewage Irrigation: A Case Study of Ludhiana, Punjab. Agric. Water Manag. 2010, 97, 541–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sparks, D.L. Environmental Soil Chemistry; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhang, X.; Yang, L.; Li, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, W.; Ye, B. Impacts of Lead/Zinc Mining and Smelting on the Environment and Human Health in China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012, 184, 2261–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yuan, G.; Sun, T.; Han, P.; Li, J. Environmental Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Bohai Bay Sediments Using the Sediment Quality Guidelines, Index Method and Statistical Analysis. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2014, 83, 210–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wuana, R.A.; Okieimen, F.E. Heavy Metals in Contaminated Soils: A Review of Sources, Chemistry, Risks and Best Available Strategies for Remediation. ISRN Ecol. 2011, 2011, 402647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chabukdhara, M.; Nema, A.K. Assessment of Heavy Metal Contamination in Hindon River Sediments: A Chemometric and Geochemical Approach. Chemosphere 2013, 87, 945–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tóth, G.; Hermann, T.; Da Silva, M.R.; Montanarella, L. Heavy Metals in Agricultural Soils of the European Union with Implications for Food Safety. Environ. Int. 2016, 88, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhou, Q.; Zhang, J.; Fu, J.; Shi, J.; Jiang, G. Biomonitoring: An Appealing Tool for Assessment of Metal Pollution in the Aquatic Ecosystem. Anal. Chim. Acta 2008, 606, 135–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Adamu, Y.A.; Olaleye, A.A. Speciation, Mobility and Potential Toxicity of Metals (Cr, Co, Cu and Mn) in Soil Samples from Dumpsites in Kano Metropolis. FUDMA J. Sci. 2022, 6, 270–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of the study area within Kazakhstan. The map shows the administrative boundaries of the Republic of Kazakhstan (A) and highlights the selected districts of the Akmola region (B) (Atbasar, Akkol, Egindykol, Ereymentau, and Yesil) in blue (source: compiled by the authors based on official administrative boundaries).
Figure 1. Location of the study area within Kazakhstan. The map shows the administrative boundaries of the Republic of Kazakhstan (A) and highlights the selected districts of the Akmola region (B) (Atbasar, Akkol, Egindykol, Ereymentau, and Yesil) in blue (source: compiled by the authors based on official administrative boundaries).
Sustainability 17 06576 g001
Figure 2. Map of Virgin Lands development in the Akmola region.
Figure 2. Map of Virgin Lands development in the Akmola region.
Sustainability 17 06576 g002
Figure 3. Comparative diagram of the pollution load index (PLI) across districts of the Akmola region.
Figure 3. Comparative diagram of the pollution load index (PLI) across districts of the Akmola region.
Sustainability 17 06576 g003
Figure 4. Heatmap of correlation coefficients between heavy metal concentrations in soil.
Figure 4. Heatmap of correlation coefficients between heavy metal concentrations in soil.
Sustainability 17 06576 g004
Figure 5. Dendrogram (a) and PCA with K-Means clustering (b) of districts by heavy metal content.
Figure 5. Dendrogram (a) and PCA with K-Means clustering (b) of districts by heavy metal content.
Sustainability 17 06576 g005
Figure 6. Radar diagram of median pollution indices (Igeo, CF, and Er) for heavy metals in soils of the Akmola region.
Figure 6. Radar diagram of median pollution indices (Igeo, CF, and Er) for heavy metals in soils of the Akmola region.
Sustainability 17 06576 g006
Table 1. Geochemical and ecological parameters of heavy metal content in soils by districts of the Akmola region.
Table 1. Geochemical and ecological parameters of heavy metal content in soils by districts of the Akmola region.
ElementsAverage Concentration (mg/kg)CV (%)Background Concentration (X + σ)TrIgeoErCFPLIZc
Atbasar (southern carbonate chernozem)
Pb0.012 ± 0.00212.60.01450.0744.4490.8907.546−1.384
Cd0.002 ± 0.00133.60.003300.01123.0770.769
Zn0.008 ± 0.00226.80.01010.0220.7880.788
Cu0.010 ± 0.00223.50.01350.0334.0480.810
Co0.095 ± 0.01313.40.10850.0704.4100.882
Ni0.371 ± 0.07319.60.44450.0474.1800.836
Fe8.070 ± 2.78134.510.851-−0.004-0.744
Mn0.370 ± 0.04211.40.41210.0780.8980.898
Egindykol (dark chestnut carbonate)
Pb0.036 ± 0.050141.20.0865−0.2572.0730.4155.151−1.744
Cd0.001 ± 0.00090.001300.08727.5000.917
Zn0.008 ± 0.003340.01110.0010.7520.752
Cu0.005 ± 0.0007.40.00650.0924.6360.927
Co0.130 ± 0.01511.80.14550.0774.4740.895
Ni0.349 ± 0.15243.60.5015−0.0323.4830.697
Fe13.900 ± 1.43510.315.335-0.082-0.906
Mn2.014 ± 0.68233.82.6961−0.0020.7470.747
Ereymentau (dark chestnut solonetzic)
Pb0.108 ± 0.175162.60.2825−0.2941.9040.3814.937−2.270
Cd0.002 ± 0.00145.90.00430−0.03920.5710.686
Zn0.007 ± 0.00233.90.0101−0.0020.7470.747
Cu0.002 ± 0.002760.0045−0.1302.7780.556
Co0.074 ± 0.01317.70.08750.0544.2510.850
Ni0.369 ± 0.07319.70.44150.0474.1770.835
Fe11.875 ± 1.72714.513.602-0.066-0.873
Mn1.088 ± 0.27024.81.35710.0290.8010.801
Yesil (southern carbonate chernozem, dark chestnut carbonate)
Pb0.011 ± 0.00216.20.01350.0584.2860.8577.88−1.442
Cd0.001 ± 0.00000.001300.12530.0001.000
Zn0.021 ± 0.01889.40.0391−0.1520.5280.528
Cu0.007 ± 0.00229.30.00950.0133.8640.773
Co0.094 ± 0.01313.50.10750.0704.4090.882
Ni0.460 ± 0.06614.30.52650.0674.3740.875
Fe9.000 ± 2.5282811.528-0.017-0.781
Mn0.475 ± 0.07615.90.55110.0610.8630.863
Akkol (southern solonetzic chernozem)
Pb0.021 ± 0.00522.50.02650.0364.0770.8157.224−1.359
Cd0.002 ± 0.00142.60.00330−0.01821.5630.719
Zn0.005 ± 0.00116.30.00610.0600.8620.862
Cu0.004 ± 0.002540.0065−0.0653.2260.645
Co0.101 ± 0.01010.20.11250.0834.5390.908
Ni0.440 ± 0.0224.90.46250.1044.7660.953
Fe11.800 ± 1.0899.212.889-0.087-0.915
Mn1.700 ± 0.36521.52.06510.0400.8230.823
Table 2. Median values of geochemical and ecological indices (Igeo, Er, CF, PLI, and Zc) for heavy metals in the soils of the Akmola region.
Table 2. Median values of geochemical and ecological indices (Igeo, Er, CF, PLI, and Zc) for heavy metals in the soils of the Akmola region.
ElementsMedian Value
Average Concentration of All Elements, mg/kgIgeoErCFPLIZc
Pb0.017 ± 0.0380.0474.1810.8367.315−1.438
Cd0.002 ± 0.0010.00522.7880.760
Zn0.008 ± 0.0060.0120.7700.770
Cu0.006 ± 0.0030.0233.9560.791
Co0.095 ± 0.0200.0704.4100.882
Ni0.399 ± 0.0460.0474.1790.836
Fe10.400 ± 2.6940.042-0.827
Mn0.781 ± 0.7110.0400.8220.822
Table 3. Classification of the degree of soil pollution according to the geochemical pollution index (Igeo) [35,39].
Table 3. Classification of the degree of soil pollution according to the geochemical pollution index (Igeo) [35,39].
Igeo ValuePollution Rating
≤0Unpolluted
0–1Slightly polluted
1–2Moderately polluted
2–3Heavily polluted
3–4Very heavily polluted
>5Extremely polluted
Table 4. Classification of the degree of soil pollution by the ecological risk index (Er) [34].
Table 4. Classification of the degree of soil pollution by the ecological risk index (Er) [34].
Er ValueEnvironmental Risk Level
<40Low
40–80Medium
80–160Significant
160–320High
Table 5. Classification of the degree of soil pollution by the pollution coefficient (CF) [40].
Table 5. Classification of the degree of soil pollution by the pollution coefficient (CF) [40].
CF ValuePollution Level
<1Minor
1–3Mild
3–6Moderate
>6Heavy pollution
Table 6. Classification of the degree of soil pollution by the pollution load index (PLI) [38].
Table 6. Classification of the degree of soil pollution by the pollution load index (PLI) [38].
PLI ValueSoil Condition Assessment
=1Conventionally clean soil
>1Contaminated soil
<1Relatively clean soil
Table 7. Classification of the degree of soil pollution by the integral pollution index (Zc) [41].
Table 7. Classification of the degree of soil pollution by the integral pollution index (Zc) [41].
Zc ValuePollution Level
<16Permissible pollution
16–32Moderate pollution
≥32Hazardous pollution
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gulzira, G.; Yerbolat, M.; Nuriya, A.; Zharas, B.; Gulshat, A.; Kairat, S.; Assiya, D.; Aidana, B.; Saltanat, A. Ecological and Geochemical Characteristics of the Content of Heavy Metals in Steppe Ecosystems of the Akmola Region, Kazakhstan. Sustainability 2025, 17, 6576. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146576

AMA Style

Gulzira G, Yerbolat M, Nuriya A, Zharas B, Gulshat A, Kairat S, Assiya D, Aidana B, Saltanat A. Ecological and Geochemical Characteristics of the Content of Heavy Metals in Steppe Ecosystems of the Akmola Region, Kazakhstan. Sustainability. 2025; 17(14):6576. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146576

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gulzira, Gataulina, Mendybaev Yerbolat, Aikenova Nuriya, Berdenov Zharas, Ataeva Gulshat, Saginov Kairat, Dukenbayeva Assiya, Beketova Aidana, and Almurzaeva Saltanat. 2025. "Ecological and Geochemical Characteristics of the Content of Heavy Metals in Steppe Ecosystems of the Akmola Region, Kazakhstan" Sustainability 17, no. 14: 6576. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146576

APA Style

Gulzira, G., Yerbolat, M., Nuriya, A., Zharas, B., Gulshat, A., Kairat, S., Assiya, D., Aidana, B., & Saltanat, A. (2025). Ecological and Geochemical Characteristics of the Content of Heavy Metals in Steppe Ecosystems of the Akmola Region, Kazakhstan. Sustainability, 17(14), 6576. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146576

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop