Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Development Strategy for Ecological Agriculture Based on a Neural Network in the Environmental Economy
Previous Article in Journal
The Eligibility of Green Bonds as Safe Haven Assets: A Systematic Review
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Comprehensive Treatment for River Pollution in a Coastal City with a Complex River Network: A Case Study in Sanya, China

Sustainability 2023, 15(8), 6830; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086830
by Wenqing Song 1,2, Shizhuo Wang 1,3, Jiang Zhao 1,*, Shiliang Xu 1,2, Xuefei Zhou 1,3 and Yalei Zhang 1,3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Reviewer 4:
Sustainability 2023, 15(8), 6830; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086830
Submission received: 7 February 2023 / Revised: 4 April 2023 / Accepted: 13 April 2023 / Published: 18 April 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Hi,

The various Equations should be appropriately referenced in the text. As  examples:

Line 90:.............the floodplain and side inflow is as follows (Equation 1):

Line 98: The basic equation...........is as follows (Equation 2):

Line 138:...... (Equation 3)

Line 218: meets the Class IV standard for surface water (provide the reference since the guideline pertains to the PRC's Environmental Guidelines)

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript has good study methods and data. It is fairly well written. However, some improvement needs to be done. Comments are annotated on the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

1. The abstract and conclusion are not concise enough, the content is messy and complicated, and need to be reorganized to highlight the innovation of the paper.

2. There are grammatical errors in the paper, which need to be carefully checked and modified.

3. Lack of detailed description of innovation content and research significance, need to be supplemented.

4. It is suggested to adjust the font of the reservoir in Figure 1 more clearly.

5. The description of point source pollution, non-point source pollution and internal pollution sources should be more detailed.

6. The total reduction rate of pollutants in Liuluo River is missing in Figure 7. If the pollutants in Liuluo River do not change, you need to explain it clearly.

7. The following papers may be helpful to the author's research and can be used for reference. Journal of Cleaner Production,350:131434; Environmental Earth Sciences, 77(9):344.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 4 Report

Plagiarism-17 %

                All the figures and tables should be in their respective sections.

     Add geomorphological thematic maps of ROI (Region of Interest)

     Should be appropriately cited based on the journal reference format.

 

     include a 3D hydraulic model diagram for the river system to get a better perspective.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 4 Report

The mentioned references and figures and tables are not in Article.For example-Fig S1 (line 76) S2(line 119)Table S2(line 110) etc

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop