A System That Allows Users to Have a Job Interview Experience
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsPlease be more organized so that we can more easily understand whether the article refers to a commercial application that will market or a training system. Please clarify this information in the text.
Another point to consider is that, for example, on page 7, the text refers to Figure 1, and there are paragraphs in the literature review that lack references. Please proofread the text carefully and organize the information, as this will make it easier to understand the ideas.
One aspect that raises some concern is the need for an underlying theory since the system aims to analyse behavioural aspects where ethical considerations are examined thoroughly. Has the ethics committee approved this work, and does it follow data protection protocols? It's essential to pay close attention as individual data is being processed.
Author Response
I would like to express our sincere gratitude for your insightful and comprehensive review of my article. Your valuable contributions and constructive feedback have significantly enhanced the quality and depth of my research.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThe article is very interesting in terms of its subject matter, proposals, and technological solutions to meet the needs of the job market.
The education system often neglects the tutored training of students and future professionals, often for purely economic reasons and considering the investment in training people - students and future professionals - as pure expense, which can be reduced/annulled through mass and standardized educational organizational procedures.
Tutoring and supervised guidance of professional practices should be a general priority, assuming the relational and intersubjective status of education and training as essential for the mediation of the world that constitutes the humanization of human being.
The author courageously attempts to provide a response in the spirit of the times, using virtual digital technology as a reinforcement and solution to the needs detected, not least the waste of human experience that occurs in situations where individuals do not manifest and develop all their potential, which can also be used by companies and society in general.
The article is well-founded, argued and referenced, and the proposal appears to be viable.
All the best for the article and its proposal!
Author Response
I would like to express our sincere gratitude for your insightful and comprehensive review of my article. Your valuable contributions and constructive feedback have significantly enhanced the quality and depth of my research.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsReview Report on Manuscript ID: sustainability-2666125
Title: A System That Allows Users to Have a Job Interview Experience
General Comments on the manuscript: Authors considered, corporate companies prioritize job interviews in recruitment, but many candidates lack experience, causing difficulties. In this study authors to create a virtual system that allows for a user-friendly job interview experience through a model consisting of a user interface unit, server, interview information database, language processing unit, behaviour analysis unit, virtual interview unit, reporting unit, and social media integration unit.
I would also like to mention that is to accept the paper only after minor revisions those are mentioned below:
The work is typically well-organized, and the English use is sufficiently clear.
The results are presented simply and support the authors' premise. The improved System and method section are consistent with the supporting data and arguments.
Context and Theoretical Background parts of the results are made clear.
Apart from this, I want to suggest that authors incorporate in the Introduction section and conclusion’s part are in line with the facts and advise further investigation in accordance with the case study report with further references.
In the above comments, the authors make these changes so that the paper's goal is better met.
I would also like to mention that is to accept the paper only after minor revisions.
With regards
Author Response
I would like to express our sincere gratitude for your insightful and comprehensive review of my article. Your valuable contributions and constructive feedback have significantly enhanced the quality and depth of my research.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 4 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsPlease refer to the appended file.
A list of strengths is provided.
The list of defects is formulated.
Suggestions for improvements are given.
There are language concerns.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
There are language concerns.
Author Response
I would like to express our sincere gratitude for your insightful and comprehensive review of my article. Your valuable contributions and constructive feedback have significantly enhanced the quality and depth of my research.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsCongratulations excellent review.
