Next Article in Journal
Corporate Governance and Financial Reporting Quality: The Mediation Role of IFRS
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigating the Role of Perceived Risk, Perceived Security and Perceived Trust on Smart m-Banking Application Using SEM
Previous Article in Journal
How Person–Organization Fit Impacts Work Performance: Evidence from Researchers in Ten Countries during the COVID-19
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improving Social Performance through Innovative Small Green Businesses: Knowledge Sharing and Green Entrepreneurial Intention as Antecedents
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Impact of Marketing Communication and Islamic Financial Literacy on Islamic Financial Inclusion and MSMEs Performance: Evidence from Halal Tourism in Indonesia

Sustainability 2023, 15(13), 9868; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139868
by Siti Mujiatun 1, Budi Trianto 2,*, Eko Fajar Cahyono 3,4 and Rahmayati 5
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Reviewer 4:
Sustainability 2023, 15(13), 9868; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139868
Submission received: 30 April 2023 / Revised: 4 June 2023 / Accepted: 13 June 2023 / Published: 21 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marketing and Sustainable Development: A Predictive Empirical Insight)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear authors,

Thank you for the opportunity to review your manuscript.

I have several recommendations for you:

1. Depersonalize your research completely. Do not use "we" at all. 

2. Follow the reference formatting guidelines outlined in the journal Sustainability template in detail.

3. Introduction: Set the structure of the manuscript at the end of this chapter.

4. Literature review: Sum up the literature review at the end.

5. Introduction, literature review, or discussion: I think it might be a good idea to add these sources from emerging markets to your manuscript as well.

Vasanicova, P., Jencova, S., Gavurova, B., & Bacik, R. (2021). Factors influencing business environment within travel and tourism competitiveness. Economics and Sociology, 14(4), 268-282. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2021/14-4/15

Vasanicova, P., Jencova, S., Gavurova, B., & Bacik, R. (2022). Coopetition of European Union Countries within Destination Management. Journal of Tourism and Services, 13(24), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.29036/jots.v13i24.368

Musa, H., Natorin, V., Musova, Z., & Durana, P. (2020). Comparison of the efficiency measurement of the conventional and Islamic banks. Oeconomia Copernicana, 11(1), 29–58. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2020.002

Musa, H., Musova, Z., Natorin, V., Lazaroiu, G., & Boda, M. (2021). Comparison of factors influencing liquidity of European Islamic and conventional banks. Oeconomia Copernicana, 12(2), 375–398. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2021.013

6. Methods: You did not specify the list of methodological steps used to replicate the study. Describe the method's advantages and disadvantages based on relevant, similar studies.

7. Discussion: at the end, summarize the discussion.

8. Conclusions: The limitations and future directions the research are also missing.


I hope my comments will be useful for your future work.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you for all of your comments and we have revised base on your suggestion.

All of our response as attached

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

It is an interesting subject and original approach regarding sustainable halal tourism necessitates.

The authors have to check the correspondence between  the references in text and final bibliography - for example Badulescu et al  - line 517.

Also the authors mus be consistent in references - for example lines 341-346   - it is specified the authors and the year of  publication.

The table no 3 - descriptive statistic -  the data for X2 and X3 has to be verified.

The subchapter no.4.2 SEM evaluation require a more comprehensive approach.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you for all of your comments and we have revised base on your suggestion.

All of our response as attached

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

- Advantages and benefits of the proposed approach should be given in detail. Also, the research gaps and the novelty of this study is not clear.

- The characteristics of current research should be highlighted in the comparative table of literature review from both aspects of theoretical and application.

- Generally, real data are tainted by uncertainty. The authors should discuss the proposed approach under data uncertainty.

- The authors should discuss on the limitations of the study. Also, the authors should discuss on the generalization of the results of the study.

- The authors should compare their results and proposed approach with popular approaches in literature.

- Some future research directions should be suggested at the end of manuscript.

Minor editing of English language required. Also, the paper should be re-edited to fix its errors in both punctuation and grammar.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you for all of your comments and we have revised base on your suggestion.

All of our response as attached

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 4 Report

The topic analyzed is a current and impactful one. It can be observed the use of qualitative and quantitative analysis, the results showing the influences between the indicators. Tourism is one of the leading wheels of a country s economy, and several  countries rely only on tourism to fuel their economy.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you very much for your appreciation.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear authors, 

Thank you for your effort and for following my recommendations. My major recommendations have been met, and I am satisfied with the correction. I still have one minor recommendation to mention.

1. Follow the reference formatting guidelines outlined in the journal Sustainability template in detail.

After this correction, I am recommending publishing the article.

Good luck in your future research.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer

Thank you very much for your good comment dan recommendation

We also have revised as your suggestion

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Unfortunately, my comments have not been addressed:

- The characteristics of current research should be highlighted in the comparative table of literature review from both aspects of theoretical and application. In other words, a comprehensive literature review as well as research gaps should be summarized in in the comparative table.

- Generally, real data are tainted by uncertainty. The authors should discuss the proposed approach under data uncertainty.

- The authors should compare their results and proposed approach with popular approaches in literature.

Minor editing of English language required.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer

Thank you very much for your suggestion and we have revised as your suggestion

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 3

Reviewer 3 Report

Accept in present form.

Minor editing of English language required. 

Back to TopTop