The Landscape of the Spa Parks Creation through Components Influencing Environmental Perception Using Multi-Criteria Analysis
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
- emphasizing the desirability of introducing landscape perception analyses when designing green areas, especially spa parks in the urban spa landscape:
- analysis of the degree and causes of noise in the park and its surroundings and based on own noise measurements;
- finding and evaluating the main criteria with the impact on the spatial design of spa parks;
- determining the impact of the criteria on the decisions taken through the use of information entropy;
- comparison of the three spa parks described in the study as a direct and tangible example of the possibility of assessing the park using the proposed method.
2.1. Study Area
- location in the structure of a large city with different functions, with a part of the analysis area reaching the strict central part, with compact buildings.
- analysis of the greater part of the area serving as a health resort (the new part of the spa is in the area excluded from the boundaries of the study).
- the health resort plays an important social role of supra-local importance (Inowrocław is one of the largest spas in Poland) and local (as a recreation area for city residents).
- the decisive importance of the spa function over all other activities carried out in this part of the city [49].
2.2. Multicriteria Analysis and Information Entropy
- 1.
- construction of an X decision matrix containing data necessary for alternative comparison. This is example 1 of an equation:
- 2.
- determination of a modified decision matrix P.
- 3.
- matrix normalisation P.
- 4.
- computing a value of E resulting from the decision information contained in the matrix R for each criterion.
- 5.
- calculating the degree of internal discrepancy in assessments against individual criteria dj.
- temperature range from −10 °C to 40 °C,
- humidity from 25% to 98%,
- average wind speed up to 5 m/s,
- atmospheric pressure from 940 hPa to 1060 hPa.
- the frequency of visits to the park,
- the time of the visit,
- the purpose of the visit,
- type of perceived sound sources—respondents chose from the following types of noise: cars, trams, buses, adults, children, fountain, leaf noise, others (list which);
- the level of perceptible noise—low, medium, high, very high.
- The respondent’s data included information about gender (male, female), age (4 ranges: under 25 years; 25–45 years; 46–65 years; over 65 years), place of residence (city, village).
3. Results
3.1. Comparative Analysis of the Adopted Variants of Spa Parks
3.2. Discussion
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Syrbe, R.-U.; Neumann, I.; Grunewald, K.; Brzoska, P.; Louda, J.; Kochan, B.; Macháč, J.; Dubová, L.; Meyer, P.; Brabec, J.; et al. The Value of Urban Nature in Terms of Providing Ecosystem Services Related to Health and Well-Being: An Empirical Comparative Pilot Study of Cities in Germany and the Czech Republic. Land 2021, 10, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Available online: https://www.europeanspas.eu/en/certification (accessed on 21 December 2020).
- Dryglas, D.; Salamaga, M. Segmentation by push motives in heath tourism destinations: A case study of Polish spa resorts. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2018, 9, 234–246. [Google Scholar]
- Yli-Panula, E.; Jeronen, E.; Matikainen, E.; Persson, C. Conserve My Village—Finnish, Norwegian and Swedish Students’ Valued Landscapes and Well-Being. Sustainability 2022, 14, 671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The Council of Europe Landscape Convention. The European Landscape Convention 2000 (Florence, Italy). Available online: https://www.coe.int/en/web/landscape/the-european-landscape-convention (accessed on 26 April 2022).
- Gesler, W.M. Therapeutic landscapes: Medical issues in light of the new cultural geography. Soc. Sci. Med. 1992, 34, 735–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gesler, W.M. Therapeutic landscapes: Theory and a case study of Epidauros, Greece. Environ. Plan. D Soc. Space 1993, 11, 171–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Irvine, K.N.; Warber, S.L.; Devine-Wright, P.; Gaston, K.J. Understanding Urban Green Space as a Health Resource: A Qualitative Comparison of Visit Motivation and Derived Effects among Park Users in Sheffield, UK. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013, 10, 417–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oeljeklaus, L.; Schmid, H.-L.; Kornfeld, Z.; Hornberg, C.; Norra, C.; Zerbe, S.; McCall, T. Therapeutic Landscapes and Psychiatric Care Facilities: A Qualitative Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sztubecka, M.; Skiba, M.; Mrówczyńska, M.; Mathias, M. Noise as a Factor of Green Areas Soundscape Creation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Stessens, P.; Canters, F.; Huysmans, M.; Khan, A. Urban green space qualities: An integrated approach towards GIS-based assessment reflecting user perception. Land Use Policy 2020, 91, 104319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takano, T.; Nakamura, K.; Watanabe, M. Urban residential environments and senior citizens’ longevity in megacity areas: The importance of walkable green spaces. J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health 2002, 56, 913–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Grahn, P.; Stigsdotter, U.A. Landscape planning and stress. Urban For. Urban Green. 2003, 2, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lechtzin, N.; Busse, A.M.; Smith, M.T.; Grossman, S.; Nesbit, S.; Diette, G.B. A randomized trial of nature scenery and sounds versus urban scenery and sounds to reduce pain in adults undergoing bone marrow aspirate and biopsy. J. Altern. Complem. Med. 2010, 16, 965–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hunter, M.D.; Eickhoff, S.B.; Pheasant, R.J.; Douglas, M.J.; Watts, G.R.; Farrow, T.F.D. The state of tranquility: Subjective perception is shaped by contextual modulation of auditory connectivity. Neuroimage 2010, 53, 611–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morais, J.; Castanho, R.A.; Loures, L.; Pinto-Gomes, C.; Santos, P. Villagers’ Perceptions of Tourism Activities in Iona National Park: Locality as a Key Factor in Planning for Sustainability. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Watts, G.R.; Miah, A.; Pheasant, R.J. Tranquillity and soundscapes in urban green spaces—Predicted and actual assessments from a questionnaire survey. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 2013, 40, 170–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gobster, P.; Ribe, R.; Palmer, J. Themes and trends in visual assessment research: Introduction to the Landscape and Urban Planning special collection on the visual assessment of landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2019, 191, 103635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernat, S. The Soundscape as an Object of Interest in Geography; UMCS: Lublin, Poland, 2015; pp. 1–14. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Zięba, Z.; Dąbrowska, J.; Marschalko, M.; Pinto, J.; Mrówczyńska, M.; Leśniak, A.; Petrovski, A.; Kazak, J.K. Built Environment Challenges Due to Climate Change. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 609, 012061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oberman, T.; Jambrošić, K.; Horvat, M.; Šćitaroci, B.B.O. Using virtual soundwalk approach for assessing sound art soundscape interventions in public spaces. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Morancho, A.B. A hedonic valuation of urban green areas. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2003, 66, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madureira, H.; Nunes, F.; Oliveira, J.V.; Cormier, L.; Madureira, T. Urban residents’ beliefs concerning green space benefits in four cities in France and Portugal. Urban For. Urban Green. 2015, 14, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merchan, C.I.; Diaz-Balteiro, L.; Soliño, M. Noise pollution in national parks: Soundscape and economic valuation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 123, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watts, G.; Marafa, L. Validation of the Tranquillity Rating Prediction Tool (TRAPT): Comparative studies in UK and Hong Kong. Noise Mapp. 2017, 4, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, L.; Kang, J. Effect of traffic noise on perceived visual impact of motorway traffic. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2016, 150, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joo, W.; Gage, S.H.; Kasten, E.P. Analysis and interpretation of variability in soundscapes along an urban-rural gradient. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2011, 103, 259–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Votsi, N.E.P.; Drakou, E.G.; Mazaris, A.D.; Kallimanis, A.S.; Pantis, J.D. Distance-based assessment of open country Quiet Areas in Greece. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 104, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radicchi, A.; Vida, J. Soundscape evaluation of urban social spaces. A comparative study: Berlin-Granada. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2018, 144, 1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Defrance, J.; Jean, P.; Koussa, F.; Van Renterghem, T.; Kang, J.; Smyrnova, Y. Innovative Barriers. In Environmental Methods for Transport Noise Reduction 2015; Nilsson, M.E., Bengtsson, J., Klæboe, R., Eds.; CRC Press—Taylor & Francis Group: Abingdon, UK, 2015; pp. 19–46. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-5915589 (accessed on 10 November 2020).
- Trimmel, H.; Weihs, P.; Leidinger, D.; Formayer, H.; Kalny, G. Can riparian vegetation shade mitigate the expected rise in stream temperatures during heat waves in a pre-alpine river? Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2018, 22, 437–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pérez, G.; Coma, J.; Barrenche, C.; de Gracia, A.; Urrestarazu, M.; Burés, S.; Cabeza, L.F. Acoustic insulation capacity of Vertical Greenery Systems for buildings. Appl. Acoust. 2016, 110, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Van Renterghem, T. Towards explaining the positive effect of vegetation on the perception of environmental noise. Urban For. Urban Green. 2019, 40, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyun, I.J.; Jeon, J.Y. Effect of the appropriateness of sound environment on urban soundscape assessment. Build. Environ. 2020, 179, 106975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iannace, G. The acoustic characterization of green materials. Build. Acoust. 2017, 24, 101–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciaburro, G.; Iannace, G.; Romero, V.P.; Trematerra, A. A Comparison between Numerical Simulation Models for the Prediction of Acoustic Behavior of Giant Reeds Shredded. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lionello, M.; Aletta, F.; Mitchell, A.; Kang, J. Introducing a method for intervals correction on multiple Likert scales: A case study on an urban soundscape data collection instrument. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 3943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ba, M.; Kang, J. Effect of a fragrant tree on the perception of traffic noise. Build. Environ. 2019, 156, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yasin, I.; Widaryanto, L.H.; Sutrisno, W. The technique of green belt bamboo constructions for highway noise effect reductions. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1456, 012006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pili, S.; Grigoriadis, E.; Carlucci, M.; Clemente, M.; Salvati, L. Towards sustainable growth? A multi-criteria assessment of (changing) urban forms. Ecol. Indic. 2017, 76, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chrobak, K.; Chrobak, G.; Kazak, J.K. The Use of Common Knowledge in Fuzzy Logic Approach for Vineyard Site Selection. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, F.; Yin, H.; Nakagoshi, N. Using GIS and landscape metrics in the hedonic price modeling of the amenity value of urban green space: A case study in Jinan city, China. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2007, 79, 240–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mrówczyńska, M.; Skiba, M.; Sztubecka, M.; Bazan-Krzywoszańska, A.; Kazak, J.K.; Gajownik, P. Scenarios as a tool supporting decisions in urban energy policy: The analysis using fuzzy logic, multi-criteria analysis and GIS tools. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 137, 110598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwiecień, J.; Szopińska, K. Mapping Carbon Monoxide Pollution of Residential Areas in a Polish City. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 2885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Douglas, O.; Russell, P.; Scott, M. Positive Perceptions of Green and Open Space as Predictors of Neighbourhood Quality of Life: Implications for Urban Planning Across the City Region. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2018, 62, 626–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Węcławowicz-Bilska, E.; Wdowiarz-Bilska, M. Revitalisations in Polish Health Resorts vs. European Measures. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 471, 112049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sztubecka, M.; Skiba, M.; Mrówczyńska, M.; Bazan-Krzywoszańska, A. An Innovative Decision Support System to Improve the Energy Efficiency of Buildings in Urban Areas. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rodríguez-Serrano, I.; Caldés, N.; De La Rúa, C. Using the Framework for Integrated Sustainability Assessment (FISA) to expand the Multiregional Input–Output analysis to account for the three pillars of sustainability. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2017, 19, 1981–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Resolution No. XLVI/657/2010 of the City Council of Inowrocław of September 27, 2010 on the Adoption of the Statute of the Inowrocław Health Resort. (In Polish). Available online: http://bip.inowroclaw.pl/index.php?bip_id=6624&cid=34144&q=uzdrowiska (accessed on 21 December 2020).
- Study of the Conditions and Directions of Spatial Development of the City of Ciechocinek, Adopted by Resolution No. XXXV/195/17 of the Ciechocinek City Council of May 29, 2017. (In Polish). Available online: https://prawomiejscowe.pl/UrzadMiejskiwCiechocinku/document/591517/Uchwa%C5%82a: (accessed on 10 December 2020).
- Spa Report for the Wieniec-Zdrój Health Resort of November 27, 2019. (In Polish). Available online: https://archiwum.brzesckujawski.pl/dokumenty/bip/stale/operat_wieniec.pdf (accessed on 21 December 2020).
- Regulation of the Minister of the Environment on Permissible Noise Levels in the Environment of June 14, 2017 (Journal of Laws of 2014, item 112). Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=wdu20071200826 (accessed on 21 December 2020).
- Zhou, Y.; Xu, L.; Shaikh, G.M. Evaluating and Prioritizing the Green Supply Chain Management Practices in Pakistan: Based on Delphi and Fuzzy AHP Approach. Symmetry 2019, 11, 1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Park, Y.; Lee, S.-W.; Lee, J. Comparison of Fuzzy AHP and AHP in Multicriteria Inventory Classification While Planning Green Infrastructure for Resilient Stream Ecosystems. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szafranko, E. Possibilities of application of multi-criteria analysis methods to evaluate material and technological solutions in the design of building structures. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Modern Trends in Manufacturing Technologies and Equipment 2019, Sevastopol, Russia, 9–13 September 2019; Volume 19, Part 5. pp. 1945–1948. [Google Scholar]
- Mrówczyńska, M.; Sztubecki, J.; Greinert, A. Compression of results of geodetic displacement measurements using the PCA method and neural networks. Measurement 2020, 158, 107693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dean, M. Participatory multi-criteria analysis methods: Comprehensive, inclusive, transparent and user-friendly? An application to the case of the London Gateway Port. Res. Transp. Econ. 2020, 88, 100887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, H.; Yeh, C.-H.; Willis, R.J. Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Comput. Oper. Res. 2000, 27, 963–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahn, B.S. Compatible weighting method with rank order centroid: Maximum entropy ordered weighted averaging approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2011, 212, 552–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamas, M.I.; Castro-Santos, L.; Rodriguez, C.G. Optimization of a Multiple Injection System in a Marine Diesel Engine through a Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Approach. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kobryń, A. Wielokryterialne Wspomaganie Decyzji w Gospodarowaniu Przestrzenią; Wydawnictwo Difin SA: Warszawa, Poland, 2014. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Pommerening, A.; Szmyt, J.; Zhang, G. A new nearest-neighbour index for monitoring spatial size diversity: The hyperbolic tangent index. Ecol. Model. 2020, 435, 109232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, J. From understanding to designing soundscapes. Front. Archit. Civ. Eng. China 2010, 4, 403–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Winne, J.; Filipan, K.; Moens, B.; Devos, P.; Leman, M.; Botteldooren, D.; De Coensel, B. The Soundscape Hackathon as a Methodology to Accelerate Co-Creation of the Urban Public Space. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cubillos-González, R.A.; Cardoso, G.T. Clean technology transfer and innovation in social housing production in Brazil and Colombia. A framework from a systematic review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jaszczak, A.; Kristianova, K.; Pochodyła, E.; Kazak, J.K.; Młynarczyk, K. Revitalization of Public Spaces in Cittaslow Towns: Recent Urban Redevelopment in Central Europe. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Couto, G.; Castanho, R.A.; Santos, C.; Pimentel, P.; Sousa, Á.; Faria, S.; Batista, M.d.G. Guidelines for Tourism Sustainability in Ultra-Peripheral Territories: A Research Based on the Azores Region’s Touristic Companies’ Analysis. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chmielewski, S.; Bochniak, A.; Natapov, A.; Wężyk, P. Introducing GEOBIA to Landscape Imageability Assessment: A Multi-Temporal Case Study of the Nature Reserve “Kózki”, Poland. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 2792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blazy, R. Planning Problems and the value of the Urban and Natural Landscape Problems in the Silesian Agglomeration. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 471, 112012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Seiwert, A.; Rößler, S. Understanding the term green infrastructure: Origins, rationales, semantic content and purposes as well as its relevance for application in spatial planning. Land Use Policy 2020, 97, 104785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gavrilidis, A.A.; Niță, M.R.; Onose, D.A.; Badiu, D.L.; Năstase, I.J. Methodological framework for urban sprawl control through sustainable planning of urban green infrastructure. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 96, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansen, R.; Olafsson, A.S.; van der Jagt, A.P.; Rall, E.; Pauleit, S. Planning multifunctional green infrastructure for compact cities: What is the state of practice? Ecol. Indic. 2019, 96, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variables Used in the Decision-Making Process |
---|
The noise level in dB—value measured at measuring points |
Scenery—surface and forms of greenery (multi-storey layouts) |
Sheathing, biodiversity—the dominant number of species in the structure of plants |
Water—the number of objects or the availability of water zones |
Park buildings—visibility, compactness, and height of buildings (zone 50 m around the park) |
Index of the nearest neighbours |
Economic conditions—the amount of property tax |
Plant area—% vegetation in the park |
Population—the number of users of the park |
Development plans—the possibility of enlarging the area of the park |
Records of planning documents |
The attractiveness of the park, according to the study |
Class and volume of traffic on the streets adjacent to the park |
Building elements |
Criteria (Measures) | Ciechocinek | Inowrocław | Wieniec Zdrój |
---|---|---|---|
Maximum noise level dB (destimulant) | 66 dB | 59 dB | 55 dB |
Scenery—green areas (stimulant) | 18.21 ha | 55 ha | 10 ha |
Plating, biodiversity (stimulant) | coniferous stand, deciduous stand | The predominance of deciduous stands | The predominance of deciduous stands |
Water—objects number or availability of water zones (stimulant) | one pond with a fountain, two freestanding fountains | two ponds with fountains, a freestanding fountain | fountain |
Park housing—compactness and height of buildings (destimulant) | single-family houses, guest houses, hotels, sanatoriums up to two floors | single-family houses, guest houses, sanatoriums up to eleven floors | sanatoriums up to five floors |
Nearest Neighbor Index (destimulant) | 1.6 | 1 | 0.3 |
Economic conditions (destimulant) | property tax for 1 m2—0.66 PLN—21.20 PLN spa tax—4 PLN | property tax for 1 m2—0.80 PLN—23.90 PLN spa tax—4.45 PLN | property tax for 1 m2—0.50 PLN—23.90 PLN spa tax—3.60 PLN |
Plant area % (stimulant) | 80% | 75% | 80% |
Availability/absorption, number of people, park users (stimulant) | ok. 2250/period | ok. 3000/period | ok. 1200/period |
Planning conditions: development plans—the possibility of increasing the park area, protection of the establishment (stimulant) | local spatial development plan spa resort park entered in the register of monuments | local spatial development plan spa resort park entered in the register of monuments | local spatial development plan park entered in the register of monuments |
Perception/attractiveness of the park, according to the survey (stimulant) | high | very high | very high |
Traffic class and volume on the streets adjacent to the park (destimulant) | rail main road | rail main road | municipal road |
Building elements (stimulant) | fountain, dense vegetation (lane vegetation—hedges), loose tree stand, grass cover | fountain, dense vegetation (lane vegetation—hedges, dense plantings of shrubs), loose tree stand, grass cover, embankment | fountain, dense vegetation (lane vegetation—hedges), forest stand—loose, undergrowth (moss, grass) |
Symbol | Criteria adopted for analysis | Ciechocinek | Inowrocław | Wieniec Zdrój |
---|---|---|---|---|
C-II-1 | Maximum noise level dB (destimulant) | 66 | 59 | 55 |
C-I-1 | Scenery—green areas (stimulant) | 18 | 55 | 10 |
C-I-2 | Plating, biodiversity (stimulant) | 2 | 2 | 1 |
C-I-3 | Water—objects number or availability of water zones (stimulant) | 2 | 3 | 1 |
C-II-2 | Park housing—compactness and height of buildings (destimulant) | 2 | 11 | 5 |
C-II-3 | Nearest Neighbor Index (destimulant) | 1.6 | 1 | 0.3 |
C-II-4 | Economic conditions (destimulant) | 15 | 17 | 16 |
C-I-4 | Plant area % (stimulant) | 55 | 75 | 90 |
C-I-5 | Availability/absorption, number of people, park users (stimulant) | 2250 | 3000 | 1200 |
C-II-5 | Planning conditions: development plans—the possibility of increasing the park area, protection of the establishment (stimulant) | 2 | 3 | 2 |
C-I-6 | Perception/attractiveness of the park, according to the survey (stimulant) | 4 | 5 | 5 |
C-II-6 | Traffic class and volume on the streets adjacent to the park (destimulant) | 4 | 4 | 2 |
C-I-7 | Building elements (stimulant) | 2 | 3 | 2 |
Analysis Criteria | Entropy E | The Internal Assessment Discrepancy Degree d | Weight w |
---|---|---|---|
C-II-1 | 0.9975 | 0.0002 | 0.003 |
C-I-1 | 0.7820 | 0.2180 | 0.232 |
C-I-2 | 0.9602 | 0.0398 | 0.042 |
C-I-3 | 0.9206 | 0.0794 | 0.084 |
C-II-2 | 0.8067 | 0.1932 | 0.205 |
C-II-3 | 0.7745 | 0.2254 | 0.240 |
C-II-4 | 0.9988 | 0.0012 | 0.001 |
C-I-4 | 0.9822 | 0.0018 | 0.019 |
C-I-5 | 0.9305 | 0.0695 | 0.074 |
C-II-5 | 0.9821 | 0.0178 | 0.019 |
C-I-6 | 0.9952 | 0.0048 | 0.005 |
C-II-6 | 0.9464 | 0.0536 | 0.057 |
C-I-7 | 0.9821 | 0.0178 | 0.019 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sztubecka, M.; Maciejko, A.; Skiba, M. The Landscape of the Spa Parks Creation through Components Influencing Environmental Perception Using Multi-Criteria Analysis. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5657. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095657
Sztubecka M, Maciejko A, Skiba M. The Landscape of the Spa Parks Creation through Components Influencing Environmental Perception Using Multi-Criteria Analysis. Sustainability. 2022; 14(9):5657. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095657
Chicago/Turabian StyleSztubecka, Małgorzata, Alicja Maciejko, and Marta Skiba. 2022. "The Landscape of the Spa Parks Creation through Components Influencing Environmental Perception Using Multi-Criteria Analysis" Sustainability 14, no. 9: 5657. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095657