Next Article in Journal
Environmental Regulations and CO2 Mitigation for Sustainability: Panel Data Analysis (PMG, CCEMG) for BRICS Nations
Next Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Recognition Methods of Modeling Design Features of Light and Micro Vehicle-Mounted UAV: Based on Support Vector Regression and Kano Model
Previous Article in Journal
Use of Off-ASTM Class F Fly Ash and Waste Limestone Powder in Mortar Mixtures Containing Waste Glass Sand
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impacts of Design Heuristics on Concept Generation for a COVID-19 Brief
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Priority Given to Sustainability by Industrial Designers within an Industry 4.0 Paradigm

Centre for Design Innovation, School of Design and Architecture, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne 3122, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(1), 76; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010076
Submission received: 4 November 2021 / Revised: 8 December 2021 / Accepted: 18 December 2021 / Published: 22 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability in Industrial Design Engineering for Industry 4.0)

Abstract

Industrial design is intrinsically linked to manufacturing; however, what is required of industrial design to adapt to new changes brought on by Industry 4.0 in manufacturing is unknown. Current literature gives little insight into how industrial designers need to evolve to the current developments in manufacturing to remain value drivers in an Industry 4.0 paradigm. There is minimal research describing the link between industrial design, Industry 4.0 and the effect this will have on sustainability. We conducted an extensive survey of 190 respondents from 53 countries to establish the present state of industrial design practice globally and to better understand the priority sustainability is given by practicing industrial designers. Qualitative data showed a desire for improved sustainable processes; however, quantitative data contradicted this, showing “sustainability” as one of the lowest ranked areas of importance in design practice for industrial designers. While sustainability—especially in manufacturing—demands more prominent change as industrial design adapts to an Industry 4.0 manufacturing paradigm, it seems that junior industrial designers do not currently see this as a priority.
Keywords: industrial design; Industry 4.0; sustainability; manufacturing; priority; value; sustainable industrial design; Industry 4.0; sustainability; manufacturing; priority; value; sustainable

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kuys, B.; Koch, C.; Renda, G. The Priority Given to Sustainability by Industrial Designers within an Industry 4.0 Paradigm. Sustainability 2022, 14, 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010076

AMA Style

Kuys B, Koch C, Renda G. The Priority Given to Sustainability by Industrial Designers within an Industry 4.0 Paradigm. Sustainability. 2022; 14(1):76. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010076

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kuys, Blair, Christoph Koch, and Gianni Renda. 2022. "The Priority Given to Sustainability by Industrial Designers within an Industry 4.0 Paradigm" Sustainability 14, no. 1: 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010076

APA Style

Kuys, B., Koch, C., & Renda, G. (2022). The Priority Given to Sustainability by Industrial Designers within an Industry 4.0 Paradigm. Sustainability, 14(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010076

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop