Next Article in Journal
The Mediating Role of HRM in the Relationship between CSR and Performance in the Hospitality Industry
Previous Article in Journal
Street Art Participation in Increasing Investments in the City Center of Bucharest, a Paradox or Not?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Marginal Abatement Cost of Carbon Emissions under Different Shared Socioeconomic Pathways

Business School, East China University of Science and Technology, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200237, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(24), 13693; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413693
Submission received: 27 October 2021 / Revised: 7 December 2021 / Accepted: 8 December 2021 / Published: 11 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Topic Climate Change and Environmental Sustainability)

Abstract

Future emissions scenarios have served as a primary basis for assessing climate change and formulating climate policies. To explore the impact of uncertainty in future emissions scenarios on major outcomes related to climate change, this study examines the marginal abatement cost (MAC) of carbon emissions under the latest Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) subject to the economic optimum and the 1.5 °C temperature increase constraint using the Epstein-Zin (EZ) climate model. Taking the “Regional Rivalry” (SSP3) scenario narrative under the economic optimum as a representative case, the expected MACs per ton CO2 equivalent (CO2e) emissions in the years 2015, 2030, 2060, 2100, and 2200 are: $102.08, $84.42, $61.19, $10.71, and $0.12, respectively. In parallel, the associated expected average mitigation rates (AMRs) are 0%, 63%, 66%, 81%, and 96%, respectively. In summary, in a world developing towards regional rivalry (SSP3) or fossil-fueled development (SSP5) with high mitigation pressure, the MAC values have approximately doubled, compared with the sustainability (SSP1) and inequality (SSP4) storylines with low mitigation pressure levels. The SSP2 (Middle of the Road) shows a moderate MAC decreasing trend with moderate mitigation pressure. The results provide a carbon price benchmark for policy makers with different attitudes towards the unknown future and can be used to formulate carbon mitigation strategy to respond to specific climate goals.
Keywords: EZ climate model; shared socioeconomic pathways; marginal abatement cost; average mitigation rate EZ climate model; shared socioeconomic pathways; marginal abatement cost; average mitigation rate

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, N.; Song, F. Marginal Abatement Cost of Carbon Emissions under Different Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13693. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413693

AMA Style

Liu N, Song F. Marginal Abatement Cost of Carbon Emissions under Different Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Sustainability. 2021; 13(24):13693. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413693

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Na, and Futie Song. 2021. "Marginal Abatement Cost of Carbon Emissions under Different Shared Socioeconomic Pathways" Sustainability 13, no. 24: 13693. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413693

APA Style

Liu, N., & Song, F. (2021). Marginal Abatement Cost of Carbon Emissions under Different Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Sustainability, 13(24), 13693. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413693

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop