Next Article in Journal
Towards Accessibility and Inclusion of Native Mobile Applications Available for Ecuador in Google Play Store
Previous Article in Journal
Greenways as Integrated Systems: A Proposal for Planning and Design Guidelines Based on Case Studies Evaluation
Previous Article in Special Issue
What Are the Reasons Behind the Economic Performance of the Hungarian Beer Industry? The Case of the Hungarian Microbreweries
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Agri-Food Trade Competitiveness: A Review of the Literature

Department of Agribusiness, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8, 1093 Budapest, Hungary
Sustainability 2021, 13(20), 11235; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011235
Submission received: 30 August 2021 / Revised: 3 October 2021 / Accepted: 8 October 2021 / Published: 12 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Competitiveness and Sustainability of Global Agriculture)

Abstract

Being competitive in the international agri-food trade is an important aim of every country. It should be noted that this term has neither a commonly accepted definition nor a synthetized index to quantify it. The most commonly used indices in the international literature are the Balassa index and its modified versions (revealed trade advantage, revealed competitiveness, normalized revealed comparative advantage, and revealed symmetric comparative advantage) and different export and/or import-related indices (e.g., the Grubel–Lloyd index or the trade balance index). Based on a systematic review of the literature, these measurements were identified along with the major factors suggested for higher agri-food trade competitiveness. It seems that supportive legislation and/or (trade) policy is the most crucial factor, followed by higher value-added/more sophisticated goods, and high, efficient, and profitable production. Although the EU and its member states were overrepresented in the analyzed literature, the candidate countries, as well as other important trading partners of the EU, e.g., Canada, China, or the ASEAN countries, were also analyzed. Thus, some of these findings may be generalized.
Keywords: agri-food trade; competitiveness; raw material; processed product agri-food trade; competitiveness; raw material; processed product

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mizik, T. Agri-Food Trade Competitiveness: A Review of the Literature. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11235. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011235

AMA Style

Mizik T. Agri-Food Trade Competitiveness: A Review of the Literature. Sustainability. 2021; 13(20):11235. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011235

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mizik, Tamás. 2021. "Agri-Food Trade Competitiveness: A Review of the Literature" Sustainability 13, no. 20: 11235. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011235

APA Style

Mizik, T. (2021). Agri-Food Trade Competitiveness: A Review of the Literature. Sustainability, 13(20), 11235. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011235

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop