Next Article in Journal
Applications of a Novel Method of Ecosystem Services Assessment into Local Policy Making in the River Blackwater Estuary, Ireland
Previous Article in Journal
A Systematic Review of Air Quality Sensors, Guidelines, and Measurement Studies for Indoor Air Quality Management
Previous Article in Special Issue
Glyphosate Resistance in Sonchus oleraceus and Alternative Herbicide Options for Its Control in Southeast Australia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Economic Costs of Sharing the Harvester in the Control of an Invasive Weed

1
Unidad de Protección Vegetal, Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón (CITA), Avda. Montañana 930, 50059 Zaragoza, Spain
2
Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón—IA2 (CITA-Universidad de Zaragoza), 50013 Zaragoza, Spain
3
Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics & Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
4
Department of Economic Analysis, University of Zaragoza, Gran Vía 2–4, 50004 Zaragoza, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(21), 9046; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219046
Submission received: 17 September 2020 / Revised: 23 October 2020 / Accepted: 27 October 2020 / Published: 30 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Weed Management in Sustainable Agricultural Production)

Abstract

Spatial externalities, such as the sharing of harvesting equipment by many farmers, have an impact on the control of invasive species in the agricultural environment. In these cases, the regulator must design a set of measures to promote coordinated control by affected parties. We aim to analyze the determinants of private versus collective control efforts in the case of a particular invasive species (teosinte) occurring as a weed in corn fields throughout North-Eastern Spain. Using a simple discrete space-dynamic framework, we model the effect of the decisions made by the farmer of an infested plot on a noninfested plot, with the harvester being the only potential pathway for the invader to spread and assuming a one-way invasion. The results reveal that failure to adopt optimal cooperative strategies causes losses to other plots if they become infested amounting to an annual average of EUR 322/ha, when the infestation is low, and EUR 364/ha, when it is high. Results suggest that cleaning the harvester, a measure currently recommended by the regulatory agency in low-infestation cases but that does not guarantee that the machine is completely clean, is not socially optimal if monocropping practices are permitted in the region.
Keywords: bio-economic model; weed management; control strategies; economic impact bio-economic model; weed management; control strategies; economic impact

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pardo, G.; Gómez, M.I.; Cirujeda, A.; Martínez, Y. Economic Costs of Sharing the Harvester in the Control of an Invasive Weed. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9046. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219046

AMA Style

Pardo G, Gómez MI, Cirujeda A, Martínez Y. Economic Costs of Sharing the Harvester in the Control of an Invasive Weed. Sustainability. 2020; 12(21):9046. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219046

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pardo, Gabriel, Miguel I. Gómez, Alicia Cirujeda, and Yolanda Martínez. 2020. "Economic Costs of Sharing the Harvester in the Control of an Invasive Weed" Sustainability 12, no. 21: 9046. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219046

APA Style

Pardo, G., Gómez, M. I., Cirujeda, A., & Martínez, Y. (2020). Economic Costs of Sharing the Harvester in the Control of an Invasive Weed. Sustainability, 12(21), 9046. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219046

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop