Next Article in Journal
Advancing Pervious Pavements through Nomenclature, Standards, and Holistic Green Design
Previous Article in Journal
Using Eye-Tracking Technology to Measure Environmental Factors Affecting Street Robbery Decision-Making in Virtual Environments
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

National Strategy for Framing and Prioritizing Environmental Protection Research and Development Topics

1
Green Processes Center, Department of Chemical Engineering, Sami Shamoon College of Engineering, Basel/Bialik Sts., Beer-Sheva 8410001, Israel
2
Samuel Neaman Institute, Technion and Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Management, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel
3
SP Interface, Rehovot 7630804, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(18), 7420; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187420
Submission received: 29 July 2020 / Revised: 3 September 2020 / Accepted: 7 September 2020 / Published: 9 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Management)

Abstract

One of the key methods for implementing the sustainability model in practice includes environmental vision and policy, goal setting, preference areas, and setting environmental research and development (ER&D) priorities. There are different ways to identify and prioritize the R&D of governments or international bodies, yet we have not found a comprehensive study or strategy regarding the framing and prioritization of ER&D at a national level. The aim of the study was to present a methodological approach, principles, and criteria for the prioritization of national ER&D. The study was initiated with a comprehensive literature review, including studies reported by a wide range of entities and countries, followed by the identification of eight principles to select ER&D priorities. Finally, each of the environmental issues was ranked in the frame of every principle, based on a quantitative criterion or criteria, considering global challenges, local needs, and capabilities.
Keywords: environmental research and development; sustainability; survey methodology; strategic model environmental research and development; sustainability; survey methodology; strategic model

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wolfson, A.; Ayalon, O.; Madar, D. National Strategy for Framing and Prioritizing Environmental Protection Research and Development Topics. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7420. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187420

AMA Style

Wolfson A, Ayalon O, Madar D. National Strategy for Framing and Prioritizing Environmental Protection Research and Development Topics. Sustainability. 2020; 12(18):7420. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187420

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wolfson, Adi, Ofira Ayalon, and Daniel Madar. 2020. "National Strategy for Framing and Prioritizing Environmental Protection Research and Development Topics" Sustainability 12, no. 18: 7420. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187420

APA Style

Wolfson, A., Ayalon, O., & Madar, D. (2020). National Strategy for Framing and Prioritizing Environmental Protection Research and Development Topics. Sustainability, 12(18), 7420. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187420

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop