Next Article in Journal
Effective Placement Methods of Vermicompost Application in Urban Tree Species: Implications for Sustainable Urban Afforestation
Next Article in Special Issue
Understanding Barriers in Indian Ocean Tuna Commission Allocation Negotiations on Fishing Opportunities
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Municipal Waste Development and Management in Self-Governing Regions of Slovakia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Can Fishing Tourism Contribute to Conservation and Sustainability via Ecotourism? A Case Study of the Fishery for Giant African Threadfin Polydactylus quadrifilis on the Kwanza Estuary, Angola
Article

Analyzing the Attitudes of Spanish Firms towards Brexit’s Effects on the Management of European Fisheries

Department of Applied Economics, University of Vigo, Lagoas-Marcosende s/n, 36310 Vigo, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(14), 5819; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145819
Received: 11 May 2020 / Revised: 19 June 2020 / Accepted: 13 July 2020 / Published: 20 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Fisheries Economics and Management)
The United Kingdom has played a prominent role in the Common Fisheries Policy—by contributing to fisheries activities and also by participating in the design of the fisheries policy. Brexit is certain to have significant repercussions for European fisheries activities and their management. This study analyses the views held by companies linked to the fisheries sector in Galicia (fishing, wholesale trade, canned fish, aquaculture, and fish processing), one of the European regions most affected by Brexit given that more than 80% of the Spanish fishing fleet working on UK waters is located in this region. We adopt a quantitative methodology based on the Pearson’s chi-squared test, the likelihood ratio, and the Fisher’s exact test for analyzing opinions about various topics. Results indicate that companies engaged in marine fisheries or trade in fishing goods hold a mostly negative view of Brexit’s effects. In total, 30% of those surveyed anticipate that Brexit will have negative consequences for EU workers in UK fishery companies; a slightly higher percentage of these respondents expect the United Kingdom’s exit from the EU to depress Spain’s foreign trade; over half of those surveyed perceived Brexit as resulting in the adverse scenario of reduced access to fisheries’ resources and were in favor of reformulating the current system of total allowable catches (TACs) and quotas among the remaining post-Brexit member states. Most respondents also agreed that Brexit will have negative repercussions on vessels of the Galician fleet operating under the British flag. Our statistical analysis identifies a significant relationship between negative attitudes and the firm’s size for fisheries’ sectors as a whole; however, no relation between those attitudes and firm size or turnover is identified when the particular fishing companies’ perceptions are evaluated. View Full-Text
Keywords: Spanish companies; common fisheries policy; attitudes analysis; Brexit; resources management; European trade; fisheries Spanish companies; common fisheries policy; attitudes analysis; Brexit; resources management; European trade; fisheries
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Amigo-Dobaño, L.; Garza-Gil, M.D.; Varela-Lafuente, M.M. Analyzing the Attitudes of Spanish Firms towards Brexit’s Effects on the Management of European Fisheries. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5819. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145819

AMA Style

Amigo-Dobaño L, Garza-Gil MD, Varela-Lafuente MM. Analyzing the Attitudes of Spanish Firms towards Brexit’s Effects on the Management of European Fisheries. Sustainability. 2020; 12(14):5819. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145819

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amigo-Dobaño, Lucy, María D. Garza-Gil, and Manuel M. Varela-Lafuente. 2020. "Analyzing the Attitudes of Spanish Firms towards Brexit’s Effects on the Management of European Fisheries" Sustainability 12, no. 14: 5819. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145819

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop