Next Article in Journal
The Influence of Alkalization and Temperature on Ammonia Recovery from Cow Manure and the Chemical Properties of the Effluents
Next Article in Special Issue
The (Re)Insurance Industry’s Roles in the Integration of Nature-Based Solutions for Prevention in Disaster Risk Reduction—Insights from a European Survey
Previous Article in Journal
The Unbearable Lightness of the Academic Work: The Positive and Negative Sides of Heavy Work Investment in a Sample of Italian University Professors and Researchers
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Edge Effect on Plant Diversity and Soil Properties in Abandoned Fields Targeted for Ecological Restoration
Article

Model-Based Selection of Cost-Effective Low Impact Development Strategies to Control Water Balance

Graz University of Technology, Institute of Urban Water Management and Landscape Water Engineering, Stremayrgasse 10/I, 8010 Graz, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(8), 2440; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082440
Received: 4 April 2019 / Revised: 16 April 2019 / Accepted: 18 April 2019 / Published: 25 April 2019
Urbanization induces an increase of runoff volume and decrease of evapotranspiration and groundwater recharge. Low impact development (LID) strategies aim to mitigate these adverse impacts. Hydrologic simulation is a reasonable option to assess the LID performance with respect to the water balance and is applicable to planning purposes. Current LID design approaches are based on design storm events and focus on the runoff volume and peak, neglecting evapotranspiration and groundwater recharge. This contribution presents a model-based design approach for the selection of cost-effective LID strategies. The method is based on monitored precipitation time series and considers the complete water balance and life-cycle-costs, as well as the demand for land. The efficiency of LID strategies (ELID) is introduced as an evaluation measure which also accounts for emphasizing different goals. The results show that there exist several pareto-optimal LID strategies providing a reasonable basis for decision-making. Additionally, the application of LID treatment trains emerges as an option of high potential. View Full-Text
Keywords: life cycle costs; stormwater management; storm water management model life cycle costs; stormwater management; storm water management model
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Leimgruber, J.; Krebs, G.; Camhy, D.; Muschalla, D. Model-Based Selection of Cost-Effective Low Impact Development Strategies to Control Water Balance. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2440. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082440

AMA Style

Leimgruber J, Krebs G, Camhy D, Muschalla D. Model-Based Selection of Cost-Effective Low Impact Development Strategies to Control Water Balance. Sustainability. 2019; 11(8):2440. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082440

Chicago/Turabian Style

Leimgruber, Johannes, Gerald Krebs, David Camhy, and Dirk Muschalla. 2019. "Model-Based Selection of Cost-Effective Low Impact Development Strategies to Control Water Balance" Sustainability 11, no. 8: 2440. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082440

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop