Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Land Use, Soil Protection and Phosphorus Management from a Cross-National Perspective
Next Article in Special Issue
Experimental Analysis of Stresses in Subsoil below a Rectangular Fiber Concrete Slab
Previous Article in Journal
Challenging Ingrained Thoughts? The Joint Effect of Stereotypes and Awareness of Related Information on Pro-Environmental Behavior in China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design Solutions for Sustainable Construction of Pre Engineered Steel Buildings
Article

Reviewing the Long-Term Sustainability of Urban Water System Rehabilitation Strategies with an Alternative Approach

1
Department of Water and Environment, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
2
Multiconsult, 0276 Oslo, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(6), 1987; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061987
Received: 30 April 2018 / Revised: 7 June 2018 / Accepted: 12 June 2018 / Published: 13 June 2018
It is generally difficult to assess the performance of an infrastructure with a substantially longer life span than economic models can handle, and the life cycle concepts in urban water systems are normally limited to single-asset projects. In order to explore the long-term impact of urban water infrastructure rehabilitation strategies, a life cycle approach for survival functions is suggested. A life cycle factor based on survival functions is introduced, which is a measuring value of the total expected service life of all pipes within a group of pipes. Another factor, termed the sustainability factor, is based on the relationship between the life cycle factor and a rehabilitation reference method, which makes it possible to correct the long-term performance of rehabilitation methods based on their expected service life provision. A case study presents the implications for investments in infrastructure rehabilitation when applying the sustainability factor in long-term planning, and shows the importance of considering the service life of rehabilitation methods when planning renewal interventions that minimize costs over their life cycles. View Full-Text
Keywords: strategic asset management; sustainability; life cycle; long-term planning; rehabilitation strategy strategic asset management; sustainability; life cycle; long-term planning; rehabilitation strategy
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Bruaset, S.; Rygg, H.; Sægrov, S. Reviewing the Long-Term Sustainability of Urban Water System Rehabilitation Strategies with an Alternative Approach. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1987. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061987

AMA Style

Bruaset S, Rygg H, Sægrov S. Reviewing the Long-Term Sustainability of Urban Water System Rehabilitation Strategies with an Alternative Approach. Sustainability. 2018; 10(6):1987. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061987

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bruaset, Stian, Håkon Rygg, and Sveinung Sægrov. 2018. "Reviewing the Long-Term Sustainability of Urban Water System Rehabilitation Strategies with an Alternative Approach" Sustainability 10, no. 6: 1987. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061987

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop