Next Article in Journal
State-of-Charge Estimation on Lithium-Ion 18650 Under Charging and Discharging Conditions: A Statistical and Metaheuristic Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Improving Coil Misalignment Performance in Wireless Power Transfer for Electric Vehicles Using Magnetic Flux Density Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
BL-DATransformer Lifespan Degradation Prediction Model of Fuel Cell Using Relative Voltage Loss Rate Health Indicator
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Revolutionizing the Automotive Landscape—Key Advances and Future Horizons of Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles

1
China Huadian Corporation Ltd. (CHD), Beijing 100031, China
2
Department of Physics, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong SAR, China
3
Automotive Platforms and Application Systems R&D Centre, Hong Kong Productivity Council, Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong SAR, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
World Electr. Veh. J. 2026, 17(2), 82; https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj17020082
Submission received: 22 January 2026 / Accepted: 29 January 2026 / Published: 6 February 2026

1. Introduction

The automotive industry is currently undergoing a profound transformation, with sustainability emerging as a core tenet of this evolution. Rapid urbanization has led to increased demands for transportation, resulting in significant challenges such as traffic congestion, depletion of fossil fuels, and substantial environmental degradation [1]. This environmental degradation includes the release of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and air pollutants into the atmosphere. While BEVs and hybrid vehicles (HVs) have made substantial progress in reducing emissions, they are confronted with inherent limitations: BEVs are heavily reliant on electricity from thermal power plants, which undermines radical GHGs reduction efforts. They also exhibit limited driving ranges and lengthy charging times [2]. In contrast, HVs remain dependent on internal combustion engines (ICEs) [3]. In this context, FCEVs have emerged as a transformative solution, employing a hydrogen-to-electricity conversion process that generates only water as a byproduct. Their high energy density facilitates long-range mobility, and when powered by hydrogen derived from renewable energy sources, they exhibit near-zero lifecycle emissions [3].
In recent years, significant advancements have been made in the field of FCEV technology, including progress in fuel cell materials (e.g., catalysts and membranes), improvements in system efficiency, and substantial investments in hydrogen production and refueling infrastructure [3]. However, critical challenges persist, including fuel cell durability, high production costs, inadequate hydrogen transport networks, and technical bottlenecks in power management and component integration. In order to address these challenges, this Special Issue has convened interdisciplinary research from the domains of materials science, engineering, energy systems, and policy research. The objective of this initiative is to consolidate state-of-the-art knowledge and to catalyze innovation in the realm of fuel cell automotive applications.

2. An Overview of Key Advances and Gaps Within the Field of FCEVs

2.1. Main Contents of the Special Issue

The articles in this Special Issue collectively advance fuel cell research from the level of components to the level of systems, providing a holistic view of the technology’s current state and future trajectory. Below, we organize the articles into thematic clusters to highlight their synergies and interdisciplinary impact.

2.1.1. Degradation Monitoring and Component Reliability

A significant impediment to the commercialization of fuel cells is the uncertainty surrounding their lifespan and the durability of their components. Xu et al. [4] addressed this by developing the BL-DATransformer, a novel machine learning framework for predicting fuel cell lifespan degradation. By leveraging the relative voltage loss rate as a key health indicator, the model delivers enhanced accuracy and robustness compared to conventional predictive tools, enabling proactive maintenance and improving system reliability, which is essential for building consumer and industry trust. In addition to the aforementioned points, Wei et al. [5] presented a comprehensive review of sealing systems for proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). These sealing systems are critical components that are often overlooked, yet they are essential for preventing reactant leakage and ensuring long-term performance. Their work summarized current sealing technologies, identifies bottlenecks (e.g., material compatibility, thermal stability, and mechanical stress), and highlights emerging solutions, filling a critical knowledge gap in component-level optimization. Mao et al. [6] further advanced PEMFC performance monitoring by proposing an improved resistance extraction method integrated with static resistance correction. This approach enhances the precision of resistance measurement, a key metric for evaluating efficiency and degradation, thereby enabling more targeted system tuning and fault diagnosis.

2.1.2. Power Electronics and Energy Management Strategies

Efficient power conversion and energy distribution are vital for maximizing the performance of fuel cell hybrid systems. Mercier et al. [7] investigated the impact of wide-bandgap (WBG) semiconductors on the sizing of interleaved converters for fuel cell power architectures. Their findings demonstrate that WBG materials (e.g., silicon carbide, gallium nitride) reduce converter volume, weight, and energy losses, thereby optimizing power electronics integration for space-constrained applications such as passenger vehicles and portable power systems. In a study of non-passenger vehicle use cases, Zhao et al. [8] developed a customized energy management strategy (EMS) for fuel cell tractor hybrid power systems. The EMS optimizes power distribution between the fuel cell and auxiliary energy storage (e.g., batteries, supercapacitors) to accommodate the variable load demands of agricultural machinery. This expands fuel cell applications beyond traditional automotive sectors and addresses the decarbonization needs of heavy-duty off-road equipment.

2.1.3. Infrastructure Feasibility and Tech-Economic Analysis

The current hydrogen infrastructure poses a significant impediment to the adoption of FCEVs. This infrastructure encompasses production, transportation, and refueling networks, which collectively represent a substantial hindrance to the proliferation of FCEVs. De Wolf et al. [9] addressed this issue by developing a region-specific modeling framework for a hydrogen transport network in France. This framework integrates technical design considerations—such as pipeline versus truck transport—with economic analyses, including capital costs, operational expenses, and scalability. Their research offers actionable insights for policymakers and industry leaders, demonstrating the feasibility of a low-carbon hydrogen distribution system and underscoring strategies to reduce costs. Mo et al. [3] provided a comprehensive overview of the advantages of FCEVs, including zero tailpipe emissions, long range, and fast refueling, as well as recent technological progress, such as improvements in stack efficiency and cost reduction. Their review situates infrastructural challenges within the broader context of commercialization, emphasizing the need for coordinated investment in production, transportation, and refueling to expedite the adoption of FCEVs.

2.1.4. Cross-Sectoral Applications and Holistic Sustainability

The versatility of fuel cell technology extends beyond road transportation, as demonstrated by De Lorenzo et al. [10], who presented a preliminary design of fuel cell energy systems for cruise ships. This research addresses the urgent decarbonization needs of the maritime sector (shipping accounts for approximately 3% of global greenhouse gas emissions) by proposing fuel cell systems as a viable alternative to fossil fuels. The study delineates pivotal design considerations, including power capacity, hydrogen storage, and integration with existing ship systems, thereby providing a framework for the implementation of marine fuel cell technology. In their seminal work, Rahman et al. [11] presented a comprehensive analytical assessment of FCEVs, encompassing a range of critical areas. These include sustainability metrics, emerging energy management strategies, technical and policy barriers, and future research opportunities. Their review synthesizes fragmented knowledge from various disciplines; it identifies critical gaps—such as high stack costs, limited refueling networks, and regulatory inconsistencies—and provides a unified roadmap for advancing the sustainability and adoption of FCEVs.

2.2. Contributions of the Special Issue to Knowledge Gaps

Prior to the publication of this Special Issue, fuel cell research was marked by disciplinary fragmentation. Studies frequently focused on specific aspects of technology development—ranging from component design to system integration—without adequate synthesis across disciplines. This fragmentation resulted in several critical knowledge gaps that hindered the translation of laboratory advancements into practical, scalable applications. These discrepancies were not merely technical but also spanned economic, infrastructural, and cross-sectoral dimensions, collectively impeding the commercialization of fuel cell technologies and their integration into a decarbonized transport ecosystem. In the following sections, we provide a detailed exposition of these disparities and illustrate how the articles in this Special Issue directly address them, thereby fostering a more integrated and actionable body of knowledge.
A significant technical deficit was the absence of robust, dynamic instruments for predicting fuel cell degradation. Conventional predictive models relied heavily on static health indicators—such as raw voltage or power—and bench-scale experimental data. These models were deficient in capturing the complex, variable operating conditions of real-world environments, which included frequent start-stop cycles, dynamic loads, and temperature fluctuations in road vehicles. This limitation resulted in erroneous lifespan estimates which eroded confidence in the reliability of fuel cells and impeded the implementation of proactive maintenance strategies. Xu et al. [4] filled this gap directly by introducing the BL-DATransformer model. This model uses the relative voltage loss rate (RVLR)—a dynamic health indicator—to characterize degradation under smooth and congested traffic conditions. The model’s integration of real road driving data, as opposed to solely relying on bench experiments, and the incorporation of dual-attention mechanisms have been identified as key factors contributing to its superior performance in comparison to conventional LSTM and transformer-based approaches. This enhanced performance has led to the development of a more accurate and robust tool for lifespan prediction. Concurrently, Mao et al. [6] developed an advanced resistance extraction method with static resistance correction, thereby addressing a significant gap in the field of performance monitoring. Conventional resistance measurement techniques have been plagued by low precision, particularly under variable loads, which has hindered the accurate assessment of fuel cell efficiency and early-stage degradation. The methodology developed by Mao et al. has been demonstrated to enhance measurement accuracy, thereby enabling more targeted system tuning and fault diagnosis. This, in turn, is critical for extending operational lifespans and reducing maintenance costs.
Another longstanding gap pertains to the underrepresentation of critical, yet often overlooked, components in the realm of fuel cell research. While considerable attention has been devoted to membrane-electrode assemblies (MEAs) and stacks, components such as sealing systems have received limited systematic study despite their pivotal role in preventing reactant leakage, maintaining stack integrity, and ensuring long-term performance. Failure of the sealing mechanisms can be attributed to a variety of factors, including thermal stress, chemical incompatibility, or mechanical wear. Such failures are a primary cause of fuel cell malfunction. Due to the lack of a comprehensive review synthesizing current sealing technologies, challenges, and emerging solutions, Wei et al. [5] conducted a comprehensive review of PEMFC sealing systems. This review encompassed a range of topics, including material selection (e.g., elastomers, composites), design considerations (e.g., compression ratio, groove geometry), and performance tradeoffs (e.g., durability vs. flexibility). Their work provides a foundational resource for researchers and engineers, highlighting the need to prioritize sealing system optimization alongside more high-profile components.
In the power electronics and energy management field, a significant gap was identified in the suboptimal integration of fuel cells with hybrid power architectures. Conventional power converters, constructed with silicon-based semiconductors, exhibited limitations due to substantial volume, considerable energy dissipation, and suboptimal scalability. These characteristics rendered them unsuitable for space-constrained applications, including passenger vehicles, drones, and portable power systems. Furthermore, EMS has primarily been designed for passenger cars, with little consideration given to the unique load demands of heavy-duty, off-road, or specialized vehicles, such as tractors and construction equipment. These vehicles encounter more variable and intense operational loads. Mercier et al. [7] investigated the impact of wide-bandgap (WBG) semiconductors, such as silicon carbide and gallium nitride, on interleaved converter sizing to address the power electronics gap. Their findings demonstrate that WBG materials reduce converter volume, weight, and energy losses by up to 30% compared to silicon-based alternatives, thereby optimizing power integration for fuel cell systems. Concurrently, Zhao et al. [8] tackled the EMS gap by devising a customized strategy for fuel cell tractor hybrid power systems. This strategy calibrates fuel cell output with battery storage to meet the cyclic, high-load demands that are characteristic of agricultural operations. By expanding the scope of EMS design to encompass non-passenger vehicles, this study unveils novel pathways for the adoption of fuel cells in off-road sectors. This domain, which is of paramount importance in the pursuit of global decarbonization objectives, is a factor that has frequently been eclipsed in previous research endeavors.
A review of the literature reveals that infrastructural and tech-economic gaps were equally prominent barriers to fuel cell commercialization. While hydrogen is widely recognized as a pivotal medium for fuel cell power, there was a paucity of region-specific, data-driven frameworks for designing hydrogen transport and distribution networks. The extant body of research on this subject has either focused on generic infrastructure models or concentrated on large markets (e.g., Germany, the United States), with limited insights for countries with unique geographic, energy, and policy contexts. A notable example is France, which relies heavily on nuclear power and has distinct regional traffic patterns. De Wolf et al. [9] developed a comprehensive modeling framework for France’s hydrogen transport network. This framework integrates decentralized production utilizing surplus wind and nuclear energy with optimized transport modes—such as compressed gas trucks for short distances and liquid hydrogen for longer hauls—as well as an economic analysis. Their research offers actionable insights for policymakers, demonstrating that decentralized production can reduce distribution costs by 2.35 times compared to centralized models. Additionally, their findings underscore the feasibility of low-carbon hydrogen supply chains. Meanwhile, Mo et al. [3] addressed the lack of research on contextualizing infrastructure challenges within the broader commercialization landscape. Their review summarized the technical advantages of FCEVs, including zero tailpipe emissions, long driving ranges, and fast refueling, as well as recent progress in cost reduction and policy support. For example, stack costs have declined by 60% over the past decade. By establishing a nexus between infrastructure development and advancements in vehicle technology, Mo et al. [3] presented a comprehensive strategy to address the “chicken-and-egg” dilemma posed by FCEVs and infrastructure co-deployment.
A critical cross-sectoral gap was identified in the narrow focus of fuel cell research on passenger vehicles, with limited attention to other high-emission transport sectors, such as maritime shipping, heavy-duty agriculture, and long-haul trucking. These sectors are confronted with distinctive decarbonization challenges, including elevated energy demands, protracted operational hours, and a paucity of refueling infrastructure. These issues cannot be addressed solely by technologies designed for passenger vehicles. De Lorenzo et al. [10] directly confronted this challenge by presenting a preliminary design of fuel cell energy systems for cruise ships—a sector that is responsible for approximately 3% of global greenhouse gas emissions and currently reliant on high-sulfur fossil fuels. Their work delineates pivotal design considerations, encompassing power capacity matching, hydrogen storage integration, and compatibility with existing ship systems, thus furnishing a blueprint for the deployment of marine fuel cells. In addition to Zhao et al.’s focus on tractors [8], this study expands the scope of fuel cell applications beyond traditional automotive uses. Specifically, it addresses the decarbonization needs of understudied, high-impact sectors. In addition to these technical improvements, Rahman et al. [11] addressed a critical gap in the field of holistic sustainability analysis by conducting a comprehensive analytical assessment of FCEVs. This assessment covered a variety of factors, including energy management strategies, technical barriers such as high stack costs and limited refueling networks, policy inconsistencies, and potential future research opportunities. Research on FCEV sustainability was previously fragmented across studies and a unifying framework addressing distinct aspects such as energy efficiency, lifecycle emissions, and policy was lacking. The work of Rahman et al. [11] synthesized these disparate strands, providing an all-encompassing roadmap that aligns technical advancements with economic viability and policy support. Collectively, the articles in this Special Issue address these interconnected gaps by moving beyond disciplinary silos and fostering cross-cutting synthesis. The Special Issue provides a more complete foundation for advancing fuel cell technologies by integrating technical innovation with economic analysis, infrastructure planning, and cross-sectoral application. This foundation is academically rigorous and practically actionable for researchers, industry stakeholders, and policymakers. This approach bridges the gap between laboratory research and real-world deployment, accelerating the transition to a decarbonized, fuel cell-powered transportation landscape.

3. Future Horizons

To unlock the full potential of fuel cells in decarbonizing transport and beyond, future research must prioritize interconnected, application-driven innovations that address technical, infrastructural, and sustainability barriers. This will position fuel cells as a cornerstone of a sustainable and equitable transport and energy landscape.
(1)
Advance real-time monitoring and adaptive predictive maintenance. This approach involves the integration of multimodal sensing, encompassing electrical, environmental, and spatial dimensions, with AI, transfer learning, and digital twin technologies. The objective is to enhance the accuracy of degradation predictions under real-world operating conditions. This approach is enabled by low-cost embedded sensors capable of capturing granular, high-fidelity data.
(2)
Build sustainable and equitable hydrogen infrastructure. Efforts should focus on optimizing green hydrogen production processes by deploying efficient, renewable energy-adaptive electrolyzers and advancing high-density, low-cost hydrogen storage solutions based on solid-state materials and compatible pipeline networks. Additionally, efforts should prioritize distributed, modular refueling solutions for underserved regions and incorporate social equity metrics into techno-economic assessment frameworks.
(3)
Innovate low-cost, durable components with circular design. This strategy involves replacing precious metal catalysts with non-platinum group metal (non-PGM) alternatives, creating corrosion-resistant bipolar plates and self-healing sealing systems, as well as designing recyclable, modular system architectures that facilitate material recovery and remanufacturing processes.
(4)
Scale power electronics and adaptive EMS. Key directions include advancing WBG semiconductor technologies for high-power applications coupled with enhanced thermal management systems, as well as developing modular converter topologies and learning-based EMS tailored to various sectors, such as heavy-duty transportation and maritime, to optimize power distribution among fuel cells, batteries, and supercapacitors.
(5)
Expand cross-sectoral fuel cell applications by customizing systems for hard-to-decarbonize sectors (e.g., maritime, aviation, off-road machinery). The customization of systems should ensure their resilience to harsh operating conditions and the capacity to meet high-load requirements. Furthermore, the exploration of synergies with stationary power systems is crucial for leveraging economies of scale.
(6)
Adopt holistic lifecycle sustainability. Achieving holistic lifecycle sustainability necessitates sector-specific lifecycle assessments (LCAs) that incorporate integrated environmental, social, and economic (ESG) metrics. The standardization of such assessment frameworks is critical for enabling meaningful comparative analysis across zero-emission technologies. Concurrently, cross-disciplinary collaboration must be fostered to ensure that technical innovations are coherently aligned with key policy objectives, equity considerations, and broader climate mitigation goals.

4. Conclusions

This Special Issue, entitled “Revolutionizing the Automotive Landscape: Fuel Cell Applications Powering the Future”, synthesizes pioneering research addressing critical gaps in FCEV technology, including durability prediction, infrastructure, energy management, and cross-sector integration. The extant literature demonstrates that fuel cells are not only a viable solution for sustainable road transportation but also hold immense potential in decarbonizing maritime, agricultural, and other sectors. By consolidating these insights, this Special Issue provides a foundation for accelerating FCEV commercialization and driving the global transition toward net-zero emissions mobility. As guest editors, we maintain an optimistic outlook on the findings and directions outlined in this Special Issue, believing that they will serve as a catalyst for further interdisciplinary collaboration and innovation. It is hypothesized that these efforts will actualize the vision of fuel cell applications as a cornerstone of sustainable transportation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L. (Yang Luo), T.M. and Y.L. (Yu Li); methodology, Y.L. (Yang Luo), T.M. and Y.L. (Yu Li); validation, T.M., Y.L. (Yu Li) and Q.L.; formal analysis, Y.L. (Yang Luo); investigation, Y.L. (Yang Luo) and T.M.; resources, Y.L. (Yang Luo), T.M. and Q.L.; data curation, Q.L.; writing—original draft preparation, T.M., Y.L. (Yang Luo), Y.L. (Yu Li) and Q.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.L. (Yang Luo) and T.M.; supervision, Y.L. (Yang Luo); project administration, Y.L. (Yang Luo). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this article. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Yang Luo was employed by the company China Huadian Corporation Ltd. (CHD). The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kamran, M.; Turzyński, M. Exploring Hydrogen Energy Systems: A Comprehensive Review of Technologies, Applications, Prevailing Trends, and Associated Challenges. J. Energy Storage 2024, 96, 112601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Reddy, V.J.; Hariram, N.P.; Maity, R.; Ghazali, M.F.; Kumarasamy, S. Sustainable Vehicles for Decarbonizing the Transport Sector: A Comparison of Biofuel, Electric, Fuel Cell and Solar-Powered Vehicles. World Electr. Veh. J. 2024, 15, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mo, T.; Li, Y.; Luo, Y. Advantages and Technological Progress of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles. World Electr. Veh. J. 2023, 14, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xu, Y.; Wang, J.; Hu, D.; Lu, D.; Zhang, X.; Wei, W.; Ding, H.; Zhang, S. BL-DATransformer Lifespan Degradation Prediction Model of Fuel Cell Using Relative Voltage Loss Rate Health Indicator. World Electr. Veh. J. 2025, 16, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wei, Y.; Xing, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Cao, J.; Yang, F. A Review of Sealing Systems for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. World Electr. Veh. J. 2024, 15, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mao, Y.; Hou, Y.; Gu, R.; Hao, D.; Yang, Q. Study of Resistance Extraction Methods for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells Based on Static Resistance Correction. World Electr. Veh. J. 2024, 15, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mercier, V.; Azib, T.; Ceschia, A.; Larouci, C. Influence of Wide-Bandgap Semiconductors in Interleaved Converters Sizing for a Fuel-Cell Power Architecture. World Electr. Veh. J. 2024, 15, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhao, S.; Gao, Z.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Xu, L. Research on Energy Management Strategy of Fuel Cell Tractor Hybrid Power System. World Electr. Veh. J. 2024, 15, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. De Wolf, D.; Magidson, C.; Sigot, J. Modeling and Technical-Economic Analysis of a Hydrogen Transport Network for France. World Electr. Veh. J. 2025, 16, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. De Lorenzo, G.; Ruffo, R.; Fragiacomo, P. Preliminary Design of the Fuel Cells Based Energy Systems for a Cruise Ship. World Electr. Veh. J. 2023, 14, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rahman, T.; Miah, M.; Karim, T.; Hossain Lipu, M.; Fuad, A.; Islam, Z.; Ali, M.; Shakib, M.; Sahrani, S.; Sarker, M. Empowering Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles Towards Sustainable Transportation: An Analytical Assessment, Emerging Energy Management, Key Issues, and Future Research Opportunities. World Electr. Veh. J. 2024, 15, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luo, Y.; Mo, T.; Li, Y.; Liu, Q. Revolutionizing the Automotive Landscape—Key Advances and Future Horizons of Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles. World Electr. Veh. J. 2026, 17, 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj17020082

AMA Style

Luo Y, Mo T, Li Y, Liu Q. Revolutionizing the Automotive Landscape—Key Advances and Future Horizons of Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles. World Electric Vehicle Journal. 2026; 17(2):82. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj17020082

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luo, Yang, Tiande Mo, Yu Li, and Qi Liu. 2026. "Revolutionizing the Automotive Landscape—Key Advances and Future Horizons of Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles" World Electric Vehicle Journal 17, no. 2: 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj17020082

APA Style

Luo, Y., Mo, T., Li, Y., & Liu, Q. (2026). Revolutionizing the Automotive Landscape—Key Advances and Future Horizons of Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 17(2), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj17020082

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop