Next Article in Journal
A Particle Swarm Optimized Multi-Model Framework for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Domain-Driven Feature Engineering
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing Intelligent Transportation Safety with Explainable AI: A Framework for Uncovering Crash Severity Factors at Highway–Rail Grade Crossings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

AI-Enhanced Circular Economy and Sustainability in the Indian Electric Two-Wheeler Industry: A Review

by
Dilip K. Achal
1 and
Gangoor S. Vijaya
2,*
1
Faculty of Management Studies, CMS Business School, Jain (Deemed to be University), Bengaluru 560009, India
2
Decision Science, Faculty of Management Studies, CMS Business School, Jain (Deemed to be University), Bengaluru 560009, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
World Electr. Veh. J. 2025, 16(11), 638; https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16110638
Submission received: 26 September 2025 / Revised: 17 November 2025 / Accepted: 19 November 2025 / Published: 20 November 2025

Abstract

Drastically cutting carbon footprints to reduce global warming is now a universal norm, in keeping with the United Nations’ Convention on Climate Change 2015. The global proliferation of electric vehicles (EVs) is, hence, appropriate. India (Niti Aayog) has given a determined call for ‘only EV’ on road by 2030, a transition which will be led by electric two-wheelers (E2Ws) with 80% of the market. The Indian E2W (IE2W) industry needs to adopt green manufacturing and sustainable supply chain management (SSCM), addressing environmental, economic, and social issues. The battery supply chain (an environmental gray area) must also follow circularity and sustainability principles. With artificial intelligence (AI) having come into play in industry and manufacturing, it will undoubtedly influence the circular economy (CE) and sustainability concerns in the IE2W space. This review aims to critically study the available literature on AI’s contribution to CE and sustainability in the IE2W sector. The study has revealed a lack of sufficient research, specifically in the IE2W sector, including AI’s effect on waste management, government policies, etc. For the government, the study recommends a higher outlay for R&D, bridging skill gaps, and strengthening regulatory frameworks and ethics; and, for the IE2W industry, this study recommends increased focus on CE, public awareness, compliance with ethical norms for AI deployment, and prioritizing a fleet-first model. The study is expected to enhance value for the IE2W sector, the government, the public, and the environment.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Technological progress in the world has, of late, been conspicuously led by artificial intelligence (AI), whose applicability is expanding exponentially in all facets of life and business. The manufacturing and automobile industry have been revolutionized by AI-powered robotics, among other applications. The electric vehicle (EV) industry, a step ahead of the conventional auto industry in terms of technology absorption, is better equipped to exploit AI for efficient processes, smoother logistics/supply chains, vendor management, and better customer experience.
A logical question: how significant is the influence of AI on sustainability in the EV industry, and for the purposes of this study, the Indian electric two-wheeler (IE2W) industry? With increasing focus on the environment and sustainability, governments and industries will need to address these concerns comprehensively, and AI will play a huge role going forward.
India is the second top net crude oil (including products) importer (85–88% of its oil needs), having imported 205.3 MT in 2019 [1,2,3,4], adversely affecting geopolitical resilience and self-sufficiency [5]. Proliferation of EVs will accelerate the adoption of a circular economy (CE), especially in the IE2W industry. This aligns with government regulations and policies nudging the industry to adopt green norms, like FAME (Faster Adoption and Manufacture of Hybrid and Electric Vehicles scheme 2015), the FAME II scheme [6], and the Government of India (GoI) target of ‘E-Vehicles Only’ on the roads by 2030 [7,8]. The Indian EV market value of USD 54.41 billion in 2025 could ascend to USD 110.7 billion by 2029, with a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 19.44% over 2025–2029 [9]. Electric bikes and scooters are expected to exponentially grow in sales [10], displaying the Indian penchant for two-wheelers (2W) and three-wheelers (3W) rather than four-wheelers/cars (4W) [11]. The E2W market CAGR of 29.07% will lead to USD 1.3 billion in sales by 2028 [12]. Dynamic government policies should complement this [13,14].
India has 14 of the 20 most polluted cities in the world, which includes 6 of the 10 most polluted cities in the world [15,16]. Pollution-related fatalities of 12.5 lakh people annually are unacceptable [17]. In India (the world’s 3rd largest auto market) [18], 2Ws account for 75.5% of the annual total production of 28.4 million [19]. In FY 2023–2024, 2W sales increased to 1.80 crore (cr) units (from 1.59 cr in FY 2022–2023) [19]. Indian 2Ws account for over 20% of the total CO2 emissions and about 30% of urban particulate emissions (PM2.5) [20]. Indian 2Ws cover a daily average of 27–33 km (maximum 86 km), covering 8800 km annually on average [21,22,23], and thus are a major source of pollution, which can be offset by a higher E2W production and penetration [24].
Environmentally, the battery supply chain is one of the gray areas of the IE2W industry, as with any Indian EV (IEV) industry. This needs to be addressed, and AI could be the catalyst to achieve CE and sustainability.

2. Significance and Scope of the Study

This review aims to analyze the extent to which the IE2W industry, still in its infancy, will benefit from AI in the area of CE and sustainability. This paper will highlight the path forward in exploiting AI to enhance value for the IE2W industry, the government, the public, and the environment. The paper will scrutinize the literature available on EV adoption barriers, the government’s role through regulations and norms, sustainability, sustainable supply chain management (SSCM), green supply chain management (GSCM), and waste management, in the context of AI and its applicability for the IE2W industry. Due to its restricted scope as a review, this study will not focus on quantitative/empirical data pertaining to the IE2W industry or specific performance data from IE2W companies.
The following outcomes are expected:
  • Highlighting the positive effects of AI-driven technology in vendor partnerships and supply chain management, and highlighting the ability of the IE2W industry to meet the government’s environmental/sustainability targets and stipulations;
  • Critically examining AI pitfalls/paradoxes;
  • Draw on the interrelationship between AI, CE, sustainability, the IE2W industry, and green innovation;
  • Assessing the impact of government support for AI in the IE2W industry;
  • Aligning the IE2W industry and its operations to enhance CE;
  • Laying the foundation for research on differing variables like AI-driven technology, the human aspect, investment, and operations, vis-à-vis IE2W performance;
  • Creating awareness of AI applications for solutions to supply chain challenges in the IE2W sector;
  • Academic collaboration for R&D on AI-absorption for sustainability in the IEV/IE2W industry;
  • Helping interested parties from not only the IE2W industry but also other industries regarding the aspects mentioned above.

3. Sources and Classification of Literature

A literature search was conducted systematically to identify relevant peer-reviewed studies examining the application of AI principles to the CE and sustainability challenges within the EV industry. The primary electronic database searched was Scopus to capture contemporary research aligned with the rapid growth of AI and the EV market. We employed two search strings whose results are summarized in Table 1. An initial screening was carried out to review the titles and abstracts of the retrieved records. Inclusion criteria focused on articles published in English between January 2016 and the present (November 2025) and empirical research published in peer-reviewed journals that demonstrated the use of AI technologies to enhance CE principles (e.g., product life extension, waste minimization, and resource recovery) within the EV or EV battery value chain. Exclusion criteria filtered out theoretical papers, policy documents, non-peer-reviewed sources, and studies focused exclusively on internal combustion engine vehicles or general manufacturing processes. The initial search yielded 386 records (see search string 2 results), which were refined to 171 records when screened for India/Indian context. In addition, considering the relatively new nature of the topic and its focus on India, other material (as enumerated in the references section), like webpages, news articles, and reports, has also been consulted.
The findings are enumerated in the ensuing paragraphs, and will cover the IE2W industry and sustainability; IE2W in the CE; CE in IE2W industry; AI in the CE of the IE2W industry; challenges, opportunities, and recommendations for AI in CE of IE2W; the identified gaps and setting up a conceptual framework; and, the exploration of scope and potential for future research.

4. The IE2W Industry and Sustainability

4.1. How Green Are EVs?

EVs and E2Ws are largely understood to be green and environmentally friendly, but the following information is relevant:
  • Components manufacturing may utilize non-green technologies and processes [25,26,27,28].
  • Raw materials/minerals used in batteries, like lithium, are dependent on the mining industry, which has a negative impact on the environment. The inherent significant geopolitical dynamics also bear mention [29,30,31,32,33].
  • The electricity used for EVs may come from coal-fired power plants or through other non-green technologies [34,35,36].
Since ICE vehicles will continue to be used till their end-of-lifecycle (EoL), EVs will not be able to replace ICE completely any time soon. There is also the issue of barriers to EV adoption, like range anxiety [8,37,38], safety aspects (batteries’ fire hazard) [39], not-yet-matured service support, inadequacy of charging infrastructure, etc. Further, some players in the automobile industry look ahead at solar power or hydrogen as a propulsion source, thus discouraging a whole-hearted shift to EVs [40].

4.2. Battery Environmental Issues and Potential for Recycling

Battery waste management (e-waste) [41,42,43] and recycling can boost CE, promote sustainability, and reduce reliance on rare earths and minerals [44,45,46,47].
The rapid proliferation of EVs raises the challenge of managing EoL EV batteries (EoLEVB). Batteries’ second-life potential [48,49] and reverse supply chain [50] can help. Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) contain hazardous materials that cause environmental and health risks unless properly disposed of, thereby highlighting the viability of recycling. While the quantum of EV battery waste by 2030 is difficult to determine, its exponential growth is certain. Indian EV battery waste data year-wise from 2020 onwards is not accurately determinable, primarily due to the domination of the informal sector and the absence of proper safeguards. To cite an example, as of 2020, a mere 10% of the total 70–90% collected retired batteries in India was performed by formal waste management entities. Improper disposal often leads to severe soil/water contamination through toxic leaching. Ironically, the government’s 18% GST on retired batteries in the formal sector has remained unchanged even after the reduced GST norms of the Indian government took effect beginning on 22 September 2025. This incentivizes non-compliance, which leads to black mass export (battery anode and cathode remnants), causing the loss of precious minerals and material. From October 2022 to 22 September 2023, black mass export in India totaled approx. 350 tons of cobalt, 71.7 tons of lithium, and 215 tons of nickel [51].
At present, India recycles <5% of its LIBs formally [41]. In spite of an estimated recycling capacity of approx. 83 kilotons per annum (KTPA), 95% of used batteries were handled by the informal sector or ended up in landfills [52]. Some companies, however, have made notable strides, including Tata Chemical’s battery recycling plant (2019) [53] and Attero’s facility in Telangana [54], which will inspire the IE2W industry to follow suit.
India’s Battery Waste Management Rules (BWMRs) 2022 [55], seek to increase recycling and material recovery, setting progressive collection targets of up to 70%, and material recovery: beginning at 5% for FY 2027–2028, 10% by FY 2028–2029, 15% by FY 2029–2030, and 20% by 2030–2031 and onwards [55]. The automobile industry’s internal goals of 95% recycling by 2030 are also noteworthy [56]. NITI Aayog’s key projections include the following [57]:
  • India’s LIB storage requirement is estimated at 600 GWh from 2021 to 2030 (only 128 GWh recyclable by 2030 and only 58–59 GWh from EV, totaling 349,000 tons).
  • NITI Aayog (2024) estimates for LIB waste vary from approx. 2 lakh tons to 2 million metric tons by 2030; they are also projecting an annual battery retirement of 3–16 GWh from EVs by 2030 [58].
  • The Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) (2022) projects that approx. 72–81 GWh of waste batteries (447–517,000 tons) will be recycled from 2022 to 2030. By 2030, EV batteries will overtake consumer electronics as a source of waste [59].
  • Other industry reports estimate that India’s LIB waste will increase from 12,000 (2020) to almost 50,000 metric tons (2025), projecting an increase in battery waste of 6× by 2040 and 10× by 2050 [60].

4.3. Vendor Management Issues

Various challenges to setting up a proper SSCM for the Indian automobile/IEV/IE2W industry need resolution [61,62,63] through concepts like green logistics, reverse logistics, etc., [64,65]. Studies on SSCM in the Indian automotive industry, from multiple stakeholders’ views [66,67], factors that warrant sustainability in this competitive industry [68], automotive SSCM in the context of CE, and setting up a strategic framework [69,70], have been carried out. Vendor management challenges and opportunities, resilience, and strategy have been covered in the transition to EVs [71,72]. Sustainability challenges in the EV battery value chain, like resource sufficiency, geographical distribution, regulations, policy, etc., [71,73], reveal that demand for lithium, cobalt, nickel, and graphite will go up 26×, 6×, 12×, and 9x, respectively, in the period from 2021 to 2050. IE2W manufacturers need to work collaboratively with vendors to ensure SSCM in production to meet global environmental norms. Outsourcing is an important aspect of vendor management that needs to be holistically researched to improve the performance of the IEV/IE2W industries [74,75,76,77].

5. The Circular Economy in IE2W

5.1. The Circular Economy (CE)

The CE is an economic model seeking to change the traditional “take-make-waste” linear economy [78] by eliminating waste and pollution, retaining products and materials in use, and regenerating natural systems. It is a paradigm shift in how we design, produce, and consume goods. It focuses on closing material loops and decoupling economic growth from the consumption of finite resources [79]. CE principles (graphically represented in Figure 1) [80,81,82,83,84] are reinforced by the 3Rs (reduce, reuse, and recycle) and strategies to refurbish, remanufacture, and repurpose [79]. Digital technologies could be used to advance CE practices [85] and demonstrate how AI can play an empowering role in multifarious areas, like the use of green raw materials, green production, high service standards, promoting product longevity, and ensuring collection at EoL for the 3R process. CE and sustainability are intertwined and cannot be seen in isolation [78,86,87,88].

5.2. Green SCM and Green Manufacturing

The automotive industry, in general, and specifically the IEV/IE2W industry in India, needs to incorporate green innovation [89] and the CE [90] in order to ensure sustainability and sustainable development [91,92] through reduced resource usage, enhanced efficiency, new market opportunities, and profitability. Green SCM (GSCM) is an alternate concept, but not entirely different from SSCM [93,94], and research shows that both internal and external GSCM can positively impact performance and organizational profitability [95,96,97,98,99].
GSCM implies that all stages of the supply chain, including green design, suppliers, purchase, manufacturing, packaging, warehousing, transportation, and even customers, are entirely green (portrayed graphically for the IE2W in Figure 2). This study finds that not much study of GSCM concepts specific to the EV/E2W industry has been performed, and certainly not in the IEV/IE2W industry. It is, however, pertinent that the tenets of GSCM (like most supply chain aspects and logistics) are not much different between the automobile and the EV/E2W industries, and hence the empirical material on GSCM in the Indian automobile industry [100] will continue to be relevant to the IEV/IE2W industry too.
Table 2 identifies GSCM practices that are most pertinent and impactful for the IE2W industry.

5.3. Green Practices of IE2W Companies

Some leading IE2W OEMs have adapted to CE significantly. Two examples follow.

5.3.1. Ather Energy

Ather Energy seeks to distinguish itself in technology innovation, effective battery management, and in contributing to the country’s clean mobility ecosystem. The firm has a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) [106,107], Ministry of Commerce and Industry, to offer strategic mentorship for high-tech startups and give infrastructure support for emerging EV companies, joint innovation programs (such as the Bharat Startup Grand Challenge), and talent and skill development initiatives. It has developed a proprietary battery management system (BMS) to optimize battery performance and ensure battery life, apart from initiatives like “70% battery health assurance” and extended warranty programs, offering coverage for 5 years/60,000 km or extended 8 years/80,000 km (whichever comes first), enhancing consumer confidence. The company has been certified for battery recycling on the Central Pollution Control Board’s (CPCB) online portal. Ather follows a policy of delaying EoLEVB to reduce waste and increase reliability.

5.3.2. Ola Electric

With a world-class “FutureFactory” project in Krishnagiri, Tamil Nadu, Ola Electric has developed one of the world’s most environmentally compliant carbon-negative production facilities. This encompasses a 100-acre dedicated forest plus 2 acres of forest internal to the plant itself. Automated production is aided by 3000+ AI-driven robots working alongside employees to produce 10 million two-wheelers per year [108]. A vast solar array on the factory roofs further boosts sustainability.
Ola Electric is also registered for battery waste recycling on the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) portal to comply with BWMR 2022 [109,110]. A recent initiative was the announcement of using non-rare-material magnets in production, in addition to the operationalization of its own battery plant, “GigaFactory”, which produces the BharatCell.

5.4. Interrelationship Between AI and CE/Sustainability in the IE2W Industry

Figure 3 portrays the interdependence between the parameters influencing CE, emphasizing how AI-driven systems can impact each aspect of the IE2W industry. Environmental and societal concerns, CE of vendors/OEMs, and the adherence by both vendors/OEMs to environmental regulations and waste management, can all benefit from AI-driven systems and processes, notwithstanding their own carbon footprints and some ethical concerns regarding AI (discussed later). In this milieu, it would affect and be affected by vendors and OEMs separately.

5.5. Critical Examination of Government Policies, Regulations, and Implementation

Indian government EV policies target adherence to CE principles. Some policies include BWMR 2022 [55] to promote the following: battery recycling [111]; extended producer responsibility (EPR) to make manufacturers responsible for collecting and recycling/refurbishing EoLEVB; setting collection/recycling targets projected at 70% and recycling targets of 90% by 2027; recycled content in new batteries (5% by FY 2027–2028 and 20% by FY 2030–2031); a ban on landfill/burning, encouraging second-life applications, traceability initiatives, reducing resource import dependence, and productivity linked incentive schemes (PLI) facilitating domestic battery ecosystem; and, “Guidelines for Prevention and Regulation of Greenwashing or Misleading Environmental Claims, 2024” issued by the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 [112].
However, while the policies are sound in theory, the problem lies primarily with inadequate implementation. Gaps in implementation include continued informal sector dominance (90% of battery-related e-waste), non-availability of disposal methods (pyrometallurgical or hydrometallurgical plants, which need high capital investments), and technological lag. Due to inadequate collection infrastructure, storage, transportation, and advanced recycling of EoLEVB, less than 5% of LIBs are formally recycled. Other deficiencies include inadequate reverse logistics systems, missing battery lifecycle tracking mechanisms, like battery passports or battery aadhar [113], a lack of a standardized battery design, and low consumer awareness.
The government needs to strengthen enforcement mechanisms [114], make capital investments in recycling infrastructure, address disincentives like GST on waste batteries and low EPR price, formalize the informal sector, enforce standardized battery designs, and enhance public awareness on the subject. It is also imperative that a continuous assessment of the CE policies is made for periodic review [115] to monitor the impact of governmental incentives [116,117,118,119,120]. The government needs to strictly enforce penalties for ‘greenwashing’ violations of IE2W companies [112,121].
Since effective government policies will promote EV adaptability, these need to be diligently designed and implemented [122]. The role of AI in the framing of policy and implications for regulations and policy is covered separately in this review.

6. AI in the CE of the IE2W Industry

6.1. The Sustainability Paradox: Addressing Environmental and Ethical Footprints of AI

AI has both an environmental and ethical footprint, which creates a sustainability paradox. It positively benefits the vendors and vendor management; manufacturing for OEMs and vendors; distribution, sales, marketing, and creation of EV infrastructure; and, the customers, who receive sustainable mobility, good after-sales service, and other technological benefits like advanced driver assistance systems (ADASs), over-the-air (OTA) updates, etc.
On the flip side, AI’s own sustainability, its environmental and ethical footprints, come under question, calling for a critical assessment of its impact. The environmental costs primarily stem from the immense computational power required to train and deploy advanced AI models, especially large language models (LLMs), that even India plans to acquire. This will need a lot of power, leading to higher CO2 emissions, since roughly 73–77% of India’s total energy comes from coal. Figures for May 2025 show coal as 46.12% of the installed capacity, but it is much higher in terms of actual generation [123]. Data centers are the backbone of AI operations and contribute 1% of global greenhouse gas emissions. This figure is expected to double by 2026. AI hardware like graphics processing units (GPUs) needs energy-intensive manufacturing that contributes significantly to electronic waste [124]. Cooling GPUs in data centers requires an enormous amount of water, straining local societies further. A propensity to keep releasing newer versions ignores the energy wasted in training the previous models.
Figure 4 explains how the benefits offered by AI to the IE2W sector may at times be at odds with its environmental, societal, and ethical footprints. Algorithmic bias occurs from incorrect training data, poor feature selection, or systemic discrimination existing in legacy datasets [125] and may discriminate against some groups of people [125], reinforcing societal biases and reducing public trust in AI. Data privacy is another factor, as AI-driven systems in EVs and fleet management collect, store, and process massive amounts of personal data, like driving patterns and location information [125].
Evidently, while AI can prove invaluable to the IE2W sector in multiple ways, the benefits will need to be weighed in terms of this sustainability paradox [126]. The government should put in place a strong regulatory framework with robust data ethics frameworks and privacy-by-design principles [127] to promote transparency and accountability and to counter its ill-effects [127]. Table 3 summarizes some risks and mitigation strategies.

6.2. AI in the IEV/IE2W Industry

6.2.1. General Applications

Lately, AI, blockchain, robotics, Internet of Things (IoT) and Industry 5.0 are gaining traction [130]. These will significantly influence manufacturing and the emergent IE2W industry will also benefit [131,132,133]. AI can find great application in overall energy management systems and to ensure the sustainability of the IE2W industry as well as of the environment [89]. Industry 4.0 (and now Industry 5.0 with the sustainability edge) have been analyzed [134], highlighting its importance for companies wanting to make a change. AI in Industry 5.0 is manifested through digital manufacturing, which can be applied in various industries [135]. This is often called the 5th industrial revolution (IR5.0) that will revolutionize the manufacturing sector to enable seamless and sustainable synergy between the efforts of man and machine [136,137]. Technologies like the blockchain can also be applied in the EV supply chain [138] in keeping with the CE [139]. However, it is important to view the benefits of these technologies in light of unique infrastructure (power shortages, charging infrastructure, etc.), economic (high capital costs prevent large-scale adoption of many of these technologies), and social (low awareness, inadequate skill development, etc.) challenges that exist in India.
AI technology can facilitate and accelerate the implementation of CE norms in the IE2W industry [140] in the fields given below:
  • Supply chain optimization: AI-powered supply chain solutions enable manufacturers to forecast parts demand, track inventory, and identify risks, thereby empowering smooth procurement and logistics. These could address sustainability bottlenecks in the Indian EV/IE2W industry, creating a more efficient, resilient, and circular value chain [141]. Table 4 summarizes the optimization in the supply chain that is achievable through AI from a life cycle assessment (LCA) perspective.
Some examples of AI applications in the supply chain of IE2W are given in Table 5 below.
  • Other AI applications for IE2W: Table 6 summarizes the other AI applications that are employed by the IE2W industry to optimize processes for efficiency, cost control, and better productivity.

6.2.2. AI in Regulatory and Policy Framing by the Government

AI can help the government frame policies targeted at sustainability and circularity objectives, as given below:
  • Data-driven policy formulation: AI enables policymakers to analyze large-scale, real-time data on material flows, resource use, and environmental impacts, leading to greater accuracy in modeling and data-supported decisions for circular policy development through predictive analytics and scenario simulations [174].
  • Adaptive and dynamic regulations: AI can create adaptable regulations that can auto-modify fresh inputs or situational changes, which is useful in dynamic domains like materials innovation, waste management, and reverse logistics [175].
  • Effective monitoring, compliance, and transparency: Empowers real-time monitoring of supply chains, resource consumption, waste handling, etc., to assure circularity compliance to aid transparency and make policies more effective [176].
  • Cross-sectoral collaboration: AI promotes synergy between government, industry, and academia for CE initiatives by identifying and overcoming systemic inefficiencies [174].
  • Ethical and social considerations: By simulating long-term outcomes of policy measures and strategies, AI enables the government to actively address societal impacts and to ensure that CE policies are fair, inclusive, and equitable [126,177,178].
  • Incentivizing circularity in industry: AI-designed policies can accommodate the promotion of economic incentives encouraging investment in circular business models and sustainable technologies [179].
To summarize, AI assists policy development by offering governments and organizations advanced tools for analysis, implementation, and adaptation, thereby creating a resilient, adaptive, responsive, and technologically superior regulatory environment.

6.2.3. Policies for AI and Circularity: Snapshots from Other Countries

Many other countries have their own policies linking AI and circularity, often integrating digital infrastructure and advanced analytics in their national strategies for sustainability. We look at a few examples:
  • European Union: The EU’s CE Action Plan (CEAP 2020) has policies promoting AI-enabled resource tracking and eco-design. The Netherlands aims for full circularity by 2050, actively investing in AI tools for waste monitoring and materials optimization [88]. Germany supports AI innovation hubs that help SMEs adopt digital and AI-driven resource efficiency tools and funds university-led “Green AI” research that develops resource-efficient AI for circular production [180].
  • China: China’s CE Promotion Law (CEPL) carries out AI-based monitoring for resource-use audits, sharing of resources, product life extension measures, and eco-industrial development, supported by tax cuts [181].
  • Japan: “Sound Material-Cycle Society” prioritizes AI-powered recycling systems and consumer digital engagement. Over 20% of industrial input comes from recycling, with full government support for holistic circularity, traceability, and automation [181].
  • Africa (selected cases): South Africa supports AI-enabled circular startups, especially in urban mining and plastics recycling, through direct funding, innovation clusters, and knowledge transfer partnerships, but faces challenges of inadequate data infrastructure and skill [182].
  • Brazil: Brazil incentivizes producer cooperatives and circular innovations using AI as part of broader waste-to-energy and recycling policy measures.
Successful implementation depends on the government’s capability to ensure effective legal frameworks, targeted incentives, open data policies, and support for digital infrastructure and AI skill development [183].

6.2.4. AI in Waste Management

AI-powered waste management is often referred to as smart waste management [184,185]. Emerging economies have the potential to leapfrog legacy waste management systems by adopting digital CE models, creating cost-effective models, and promoting sustainability [186]. They often use PPP models, public and donor funding, open-source platforms, and collaborative innovation ecosystems (DMR 2023) to overcome financial hurdles [187]. Some of the key AI applications for this are given below:
  • Waste sorting: AI-driven systems considerably improve sorting (plastics, metals, and other materials) accuracy for recyclables and help to reduce contamination and boost recycling rates vis-à-vis manual sorting [188].
  • Smart waste collection: AI in conjunction with IoT sensors predicts saturation levels of waste bins and optimizes collection routines, thereby reducing fuel consumption, operating costs, and emissions [189].
  • Waste data analytics: AI collates and analyses waste generation data to facilitate planning and decision-making in policy through real-time dashboards with municipal authorities and companies. This also helps to measure performance and identify recycling loopholes [186].
  • Consumer engagement: AI-powered mobile apps encourage sustainable behavior by informing citizens about waste segregation, collection timings, and incentivizing recycling participation, thereby boosting CE principles at grassroots levels [188]. Countries like India and Kenya tackle growing electronic waste [190] and deploy mobile-first platforms linking households with informal waste collectors for more efficient recycling and reuse [191].

6.2.5. Limits, Risks, and Trade-Offs for AI in Waste Management

Deployment of AI-driven systems for waste management in emerging economies will have to deal with challenges that limit full utility. There will be risks and trade-offs. The path to a tailored and contextual process using technological innovations, effective regulatory frameworks, and pertinent stakeholder engagement will have to be worked out:
  • Infrastructure and technical challenges: The inadequacy of extensive IoT networks, sensor technologies, and effective data collection systems prevents AI from functioning optimally in waste management [192]. Waste data is also sporadic and inaccurate, which impairs prediction in waste patterns and route optimization [186]. The complexity of integrating AI with legacy systems and informal networks is also an issue [189].
  • Financial and resource constraints: AI hardware, software, and implementation are expensive for municipalities or waste companies, necessitating hand-holding from the government or other sources [188]. Added to this is the skill gap due to a shortage of personnel who are AI-trained and who understand data science while also having exposure to waste management [191].
  • Social and institutional barriers: Informal waste management agencies are an inseparable part of waste collection in developing countries, and their integration into AI-driven systems can be a challenge [186]. Lack of awareness of AI’s benefits in decision-makers and society at large adversely affects investment and adoption [188]. Insufficient regulatory frameworks for data governance, privacy, and AI ethics pose their own set of challenges [189].
  • Environmental and operational risks: Uneven waste generation patterns, in terms of waste types, volumes, and disposal practices across geographies, complicate AI efficiency [193]. In developing economies, due to financial and institutional constraints, the maintenance and adaptation of AI systems are impacted [186].
These challenges necessitate tailored, context-sensitive approaches combining technological innovation with capacity building, regulatory strengthening, and inclusive stakeholder engagement to enable effective AI-driven waste management in developing countries [192].

7. Challenges, Opportunities, and Recommendations

We summarize the challenges, opportunities, and recommendations for applications of AI in the CE and sustainability of the IE2W industry below.

7.1. Challenges

There are certain key challenges that arise when integrating AI into IEV/IE2W CE models. These challenges include technical, organizational, and systemic barriers that restrict the efficiency of AI systems and their positive impact on circularity and sustainability [194]. These are discussed below:
  • Data quality and availability: IEV/IE2W supply chains and recycling networks, as yet, do not have access to the accurate, comprehensive, and real-time data required for training AI models. They also lack the desired digital infrastructure and standardization across data sources [194].
  • Hunger for resources and negative environmental impact: Large-scale AI models require significant computational power, necessitating high energy consumption and heavy reliance on rare earth metals, thereby negating sustainability gains [179].
  • Linear model bias: Many existing AI solutions may suffer biases arising from the legacy training data obtained from linear (take–make–waste) models. This may prejudice circular production, procurement, and supply chain practices unless the AI systems are retrained appropriately [179].
  • Interoperability and integration: Data protocols and IT systems across OEMs, recyclers, and suppliers are not standardized and remain fragmented, which at times precludes seamless AI integration for circularity and sustainability of business models [181,195].
  • Ethical, privacy, and security concerns: Privacy, security, and ethical concerns should be addressed through robust governance systems to foster consumer trust [126].
  • Skill and knowledge gaps: There is a skill deficit for recycling and CE throughout the battery value chain, from recovery to transportation to testing, recycling, and refurbishment. There is also low consumer awareness of battery environmental and safety risks. There is a shortage of professionals with cross-disciplinary knowledge in AI, CE principles, and EV technology, precluding the holistic organizational exploitation of AI and implementation of AI-driven circular solutions [196].
  • Financial and regulatory barriers: Prohibitive capital costs for recycling plants (between Rs 220 and 370 cr) add to the lower penetration and willingness to invest. A total of 18% GST on retired batteries disincentivizes recycling. Further, there are logistical and data gaps. High capital outlay for AI infrastructure and systems causes problems for smaller firms, which are quite prevalent in the IE2W industry [196].
  • Complexity of the EV value chain: The complexities involved in IEV/IE2W parts and multiple vendors imply the need for the utmost coordination, efficient reverse logistics, and comprehensive adoption of circular practices by OEMs and all other stakeholders in the value chain [197]. These challenges highlight the need for orienting AI towards circularity, robust cross-sector collaboration, and supportive governmental frameworks to accrue the maximum benefits of AI within the IEV/IE2W CE models [194].

7.2. Opportunities

Despite challenges, India has significant opportunities to establish a thriving CE for EV batteries, as given below:
  • Reducing imports of LIBs (now at 100%);
  • Recycling to reduce imports of rare earths and minerals to boost geopolitical resilience (recent discovery of Li reserves in India further offers long-term promise for domestic supply) [198];
  • Battery recycling (market estimated at USD 95 billion annually by 2040) to recover 50–95% [199] and to boost profitability, economic viability, and job creation (total LIB recycling market in India by 2030 is estimated at USD 11 billion);
  • Addressing environmental concerns and lowering carbon emissions by up to 90%;
  • Repurposing EoLEVB into stationary energy storage (ESS) systems [52,200];
  • Exploiting AI and other technological advances and green innovation;
  • Collaborative efforts on CE between lawmakers, automakers, vendors, battery manufacturers, recyclers, and academia.

7.3. Recommendations

Recommendations emerging from the study are summarized in Table 7 below.

8. Gaps in the Literature

Going forward, it is clear that AI is not a solitary panacea but a strategic enabler to facilitate India’s EV sustainability and CE goals. ROL on the subject brings out that most research has been carried out in China, SE Asian countries, and some Middle Eastern/African countries. Few studies exist in India, and even these are limited to the manufacturing sector, in general, or to the automobile industry, and not particularly either the IEV or the IE2W industry.
Areas not covered by the literature, as seen during the review, are summarized in Table 8 below, which also implies the areas for future research.

9. A Conceptual Framework

Through the identification of gaps, one can arrive at a tentative conceptual framework, as given in Figure 5. The framework considers AI and government policies as being the two independent variables with a total of five constructs between them that are connected to the two dependent variables of the CE and environmental and societal impact. Furthermore, these dependent variables have parameters under them, which would be influenced by AI and government policies, respectively. It bears relevance that for both CE on one hand, and environmental and societal impact on the other, it would play differently for OEMs, who are the manufacturers of the IE2Ws, and the vendors, who supply parts and components to facilitate the manufacturing for the OEMs. Our understanding of environmental and sustainability issues would be incomplete without also factoring in societal aspects. The framework draws (but is distinct) from various models for SSCM (natural resource based view or N-RBV [209], stakeholder and legitimacy theory [210], institutional theory [211]), Industry 5.0 (human centricity and resilience models [212], sustainability model [213]), and CE (10R Model [214], C2C Model [215]).

10. Scope for Research and Potential

10.1. Limitations of Study

Limitations for this review include a lack of adequate material, including empirical data in the Indian context with reference to the applicability of AI in the CE and sustainability of the EV industry, and virtually none at all for the IE2W industry. Some dynamics of the automobile industry in India, which has been taken as a reference point, may or may not work well for the IEV/IE2W industry. While the application of AI is often spoken about and touted, the on-ground utilization of AI-driven technology, processes, and systems may not be very widespread or mainstream, which leaves unanswered questions. Further, the country has been relatively slow off the block on AI, with most LLMs and models being of Western origin. Government regulations are the same, and policies are a work-in-progress with an unsatisfactory implementation record. With the dynamic nature of the constantly evolving IE2W industry, it may be difficult to accurately predict the scope of AI applicability in the near (5 years) and mid-term (10 years) future. Hence, present-day indicators have been relied on for projections. Considering the competitive nature of the IE2W industry, information, other than what is available on the open domain, is hard to come by (except for OEMs, which have gone public). Details of vendors are also hazy, with no definitive directory giving their credentials, and with open domain information varying greatly.

10.2. Discussions

10.2.1. Theoretical

Theoretical and managerial discussion points in a research article on the role of AI in the CE and sustainability of the EV industry should logically focus on both conceptual frameworks and actionable strategies for industry leaders [216]. A few theoretical discussion points are brought out below to underscore the role of AI in the CE of the IEV/IE2W industry:
  • AI enables the CE: AI facilitates product design, which empowers circularity, ensures resource optimization, and facilitates decision-making using predictive analytics and tools [217].
  • Sustainability in manufacturing: Deployment of AI in EV/E2W manufacturing cuts waste, reduces carbon footprints, and advances the life of products through predictive maintenance, efficient use of energy, and a streamlined supply chain [218].
  • Frameworks across disciplines: When a conceptual model is devised, which combines green and sustainable manufacturing, digitalization, and circular supply chains, it demonstrates the synergy between business, technology, policy, and societal factors, which further boost the transition towards sustainability
  • Data-driven innovation: AI encompasses data collation, real-time monitoring, and simulation of environmental as well as economic impact to ensure a dynamically improving circularity for the business model [219].

10.2.2. Managerial Practices

Taking the theoretical aspects forward, we have outlined steps that can be taken by managers to adopt ‘leagile’ practices [220], supplier selection [221,222], and AI in manufacturing [223]. Indian IEV/IE2W managers should adapt global best practices to the domestic supply chain [61,224], incorporating AI. Our work highlights the significance of AI in promoting the CE and sustainability in the IE2W industry. Certain other relevant issues for managers on this topic are given below:
  • Acting upon circular strategies: This can be performed by managers by leveraging AI tools to ensure circularity in the supply chain through the planned recovery, reallocation, refurbishment, sale, and disassembly of EV components in a smooth manner [225].
  • Resource optimization and waste reduction: AI-driven solutions can be used to optimize material flow, facilitate sorting through visual recognition, and ensure effective energy management towards sustainability in resource use [226].
  • Supply chain collaboration and transparency: AI facilitates real-time data sharing, stakeholders’ collaboration, and adaptive decision-making across multiple circular levels, including recycling agencies, logisticians, repair and maintenance services, and the OEMs [139].
  • Strategic sustainability initiatives: Managers can employ AI analytics to simulate situations, forecast market developments, predict demand, and adapt circularity in their business models to enhance profitability and competitiveness while simultaneously meeting the obligations of government regulations and environmental norms [227].
  • Ethical considerations: Effective managers should not ignore the sensitivity of data security, interoperability, skill gaps, and ethical design [218].
The above covers both the conceptual analysis and an actionable roadmap for managers to benefit from AI to drive circularity and sustainability in the IE2W context [216].

11. Summary

India is experiencing an EV revolution, of which E2W is a major component. The enormous future potential of the IE2W industry makes it an ideal candidate for study.
The main contributions of the study include highlighting the extent to which AI can be used to enhance CE and sustainability in the IE2W industry, while also taking into account the pitfalls of AI as well as its own environmental footprint. The study has revealed myriad use-cases for AI in all aspects of the IE2W industry, including vendor management, the supply chain, logistics, transportation, manufacturing, waste management, marketing, servicing, consumer engagement, and EoL management for batteries. All of these contribute to the CE and sustainability of the sector as a whole.
The government has an important role with regard to fixing policy and the regulatory frameworks. The study finds that policies and regulations in themselves will not be adequate without an effective methodology in place for their implementation and enforcement.
Gaps that have emerged in the reviewed literature have emphasized the areas that researchers can address exclusively in the IEV/IE2W sector. These include the following: (a) subject-particular issues like specific application of AI to CE, GSCM, and effects of AI on environmental aspects, including waste management and pollution control; (b) policy impact, impact of AI on job creation in this sector, and impact of R&D; (c) and, all technological aspects with regard to the deployment of AI in the IEV/IE2W sector that set it apart from other industries, including the automobile industry. Being an industry that is still young in India, there is ample scope for deeper exploration of many aspects based on empirical studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.K.A. and G.S.V.; methodology, D.K.A.; software, D.K.A.; validation, G.S.V.; formal analysis, G.S.V.; investigation, D.K.A. and G.S.V.; resources, D.K.A. and G.S.V.; data curation, D.K.A. and G.S.V.; writing—original draft preparation, D.K.A.; writing—review and editing, G.S.V.; visualization, D.K.A.; supervision, G.S.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

During the preparation of this manuscript/study, the authors used Gemini AI (version 2.5 Flash) for the purpose of generating a background image for Figure 2. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
2WTwo-wheelers
3WThree-wheelers
4WFour-wheelers/cars
5RsReduce, reuse, repurpose, remanufacture, and recycle
ADASAdaptive driver assistance system
AIArtificial intelligence
BMSBattery management system
BWMRBattery waste management rules
CAGRCompounded annual growth rate
CDPCarbon disclosure project
CECircular economy
CEPLChina’s CE promotion law
CIIConfederation of Indian Industry
CO2Carbon dioxide
DPIITDepartment for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade
E2W Electric two-wheelers
EoLEnd-of-Life
EPRExtended producer liability
EoLEVBEnd-of-Life EV batteries
EUEuropean Union
EVElectric vehicles
FAMEFaster adoption and manufacture of the hybrid and electric vehicles scheme
GPUsGraphics processing units
GSCMGreen supply chain management
GST Goods and Services Tax
ICEInternal combustion engines
IEVIndian electric vehicles (industry)
IE2WIndian EV two-wheelers
IITIndian Institute of Technology
IoTInternet of Things
IR5.05th industrial revolution
KTPAKilotons per annum
LIBLithium-ion battery
LLMLanguage learning model (in AI)
MoUMemorandum of Understanding
MSMEMedium, small, and micro enterprises
OEMOriginal equipment manufacturer
OTAOver-the-air (as in updates given to EVs)
OBDOnboard diagnostics
PPPPublic–private partnerships
PLIProductivity linked incentive (scheme)
R&D Research and development
SoCState of charge
SoHState of health
SSCMSustainable supply chain management
USUnited States
V2Gvehicle-to-grid technologies
VMIVendor managed inventory

References

  1. Pandey, P.C. India Imports 82% of Its Oil Needs and Aims to Reach 67% By 2022. Climate Scorecard. Available online: https://www.climatescorecard.org/2022/06/india-imports-82-of-its-oil-needs-and-aims-to-reach-67-by-2022/ (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  2. Petroleum, B. Statistical Review of World Energy; British Petroleum: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sharma, S. India’s Oil Import Dependency on Course to Hit Fresh Full-Year High in FY25 Amid Growing Demand, Stagnant Domestic production; The Hindu: Chennai, India, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kala, R.R. India’s Crude Oil Import Dependence Rises to Record 90%; Business Line: Chennai, India, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dua, R.; Almutairi, S.; Bansal, P. Emerging energy economics and policy research priorities for enabling the electric vehicle sector. Energy Rep. 2024, 12, 1836–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. NAB FAME II. National Mission for Electric Mobility. Available online: https://fame2.heavyindustries.gov.in/content/english/1_1_AboutUs.aspx (accessed on 11 February 2023).
  7. Dhawan, R.; Gupta, S.; Hensley, R.; Huddar, N.; Iyer, B.; Mangaleswaran, R. The Future of Mobility in India: Challenges & Opportunities for the Auto Component Industry. September 2017. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/the-future-of-mobility-in-india-challenges-and-opportunities-for-the-auto-component-industry (accessed on 13 September 2025).
  8. Khurana, A.; Kumar, V.V.R.; Sidhpuria, M. A Study on the Adoption of Electric Vehicles in India: The Mediating Role of Attitude. Vis. J. Bus. Perspect. 2020, 24, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Intelligence, M. India Electric Vehicle Market—Focusing on Market Growth, Industry Analysis, Size, and Forecast Up to 2030. January. 2025. Available online: https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/india-electric-vehicle-market (accessed on 28 August 2025).
  10. Khande, M.S.; Patil, A.S.; Andhale, G.C.; Shirsat, R.S. Design and Development of Electric Scooter. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 2020, 7, 359–364. [Google Scholar]
  11. Jacob, C. India Is Learning to Love Electric Vehicles—But They’re Not Cars. Available online: https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/09/india-is-starting-to-love-electric-vehicles-with-two-wheels.html (accessed on 16 July 2025).
  12. Dhaked, D.K.; Birla, D. Microgrid Designing for Electrical Two-Wheeler Charging Station Supported by Solar PV and Fuel Cell. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 2021, 14, 2517–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Norikun, B. The Importance of Government Policy in Influencing the Increase in Purchasing Interest Electric Vehicles. Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. Growth Eval. 2025, 6, 395–400. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hales, D.N.; Yun, G.; Kale, D. The Efficacy of India’s Electric Vehicle Market: Can FAME Deliver Results? Mark. Glob. Dev. Rev. 2024, 9, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mishra, S.; Malhotra, G. Is India Ready for e-Mobility? An Exploratory Study to Understand e-Vehicles Purchase Intention. Theor. Econ. Lett. 2019, 9, 376–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Panwar, U.; Kumar, A.; Chakrabarti, D. Barriers in implementation of electric vehicles in India. Int. J. Electr. Hybrid Veh. 2019, 11, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Broom, D. 6 of the World’s 10 Most Polluted Cities are in India. World Economic Forum. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2020/03/6-of-the-world-s-10-most-polluted-cities-are-in-india/ (accessed on 27 August 2025).
  18. ANI. India Tops Japan to Become World’s 3rd Largest Auto Market; Fortune India: Gurugram, India, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  19. SIAM. SIAM Annual Report 2023–24; The Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers: New Delhi, India, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  20. Vats, G.; Mathur, R. A net-zero emissions energy system in India by 2050: An exploration. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 352, 131417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bansal, P.; Kockelman, K.M.; Schievelbein, W.; Schauer-West, S. Indian vehicle ownership and travel behavior: A case study of Bengaluru, Delhi and Kolkata. Res. Transp. Econ. 2018, 71, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nagpure, A.S.; Gurjar, B.R. Development and evaluation of Vehicular Air Pollution Inventory model. Atmos. Environ. 2012, 59, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sati, A.; Powell, L.; Tomar, V.K. Road Emission Control: Electrifying Personal Mobility in India. Observer Research Foundation, Oct. 2021. Available online: https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/road-emission-control-electrifying-personal-mobility-in-india (accessed on 12 July 2025).
  24. Dhairiyasamy, R.; Gabiriel, D. Sustainable mobility in India: Advancing domestic production in the electric vehicle sector. Discov. Sustain. 2025, 6, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wei, X.; Dou, X. Application of sustainable supply chain finance in end-of-life electric vehicle battery management: A literature review. Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. J. 2022, 34, 368–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Deshwal, D.; Sangwan, P.; Dahiya, N. Economic Analysis of Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling in India. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2022, 124, 3263–3286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rajaeifar, M.A.; Ghadimi, P.; Raugei, M.; Wu, Y.; Heidrich, O. Challenges and recent developments in supply and value chains of electric vehicle batteries: A sustainability perspective. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2022, 180, 106144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tavana, M.; Sohrabi, M.; Rezaei, H.; Sorooshian, S.; Mina, H. A sustainable circular supply chain network design model for electric vehicle battery production using internet of things and big data. Expert Syst. 2024, 41, e13395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Safari, M. A Perspective on the Battery Value Chain and the Future of Battery Electric Vehicles. Battery Energy 2025, 4, 20240016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Graham, J.D.; Rupp, J.A.; Brungard, E. Lithium in the Green Energy Transition: The Quest for Both Sustainability and Security. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Herrington, R. Mining our green future. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2021, 6, 456–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Murdock, B.E.; Toghill, K.E.; Tapia-Ruiz, N. A Perspective on the Sustainability of Cathode Materials used in Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2102028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Penn, I.; Lipton, E. The Lithium Gold Rush: Inside the Race to Power Electric Vehicles; The New York Times: New York, NY, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  34. Schill, W.-P.; Gerbaulet, C. Power system impacts of electric vehicles in Germany: Charging with coal or renewables? Appl. Energy 2015, 156, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shu, T.; Papageorgiou, D.J.; Harper, M.R.; Rajagopalan, S.; Rudnick, I.; Botterud, A. From coal to variable renewables: Impact of flexible electric vehicle charging on the future Indian electricity sector. Energy 2023, 269, 126465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Haitao, N. Implementation of a Green Economy: Coal Industry, Electric Vehicles, and Tourism in Indonesia. Dinasti Int. J. Econ. Financ. Account. 2022, 1075, 012056. [Google Scholar]
  37. Jain, S.; Gautam, S.; Malik, P.; Kumar, S.; Krishnan, C. A multi-phase qualitative study on consumers’ barriers and drivers of electric vehicle use in India: Policy implications. Energy Policy 2025, 196, 114415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jagtap, D.M.; Alvi, D.S. Deciphering Customer Purchase Priorities: Insights from Two-Wheeler Dealer Managers in Pune. Int. J. Res. Manag. Soc. Sci. 2023, 11, 67–75. [Google Scholar]
  39. Digalwar, A.K.; Saraswat, S.K.; Rastogi, A.; Thomas, R.G. A comprehensive framework for analysis and evaluation of factors responsible for sustainable growth of electric vehicles in India. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 378, 134601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Venkatasatish, R.; Dhanamjayulu, C. Reinforcement learning based energy management systems and hydrogen refuelling stations for fuel cell electric vehicles: An overview. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 27646–27670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. TOI. Can Battery Recycling Solve EV Industry’s Growing e-Waste Problem? Times of India: New Delhi, India, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  42. Asokan, V.A.; Teah, H.Y.; Kawazu, E.; Hotta, Y. Ambitious EV policy expedites the e-waste and socio-environmental impacts in India. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023, 190, 106829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shankar, S.; Rachakonda, S. Investing in the Waste and Circularity Sector in India—E-Waste and Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling Guide; Climate Connect Advisors Private Limited: Mumbai, India, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  44. Lee, J.; Choe, H.; Yoon, H.-Y. Past trends and future directions for circular economy in electric vehicle waste battery reuse and recycling: A bibliometric analysis. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2025, 75, 104198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cheng, A.L.; Fuchs, E.R.H.; Karplus, V.J.; Michalek, J.J. Electric vehicle battery chemistry affects supply chain disruption vulnerabilities. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Sopha, B.M.; Purnamasari, D.M.; Ma’mun, S. Barriers and Enablers of Circular Economy Implementation for Electric-Vehicle Batteries: From Systematic Literature Review to Conceptual Framework. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Baars, J.; Domenech, T.; Bleischwitz, R.; Melin, H.E.; Heidrich, O. Circular economy strategies for electric vehicle batteries reduce reliance on raw materials. Nat. Sustain. 2020, 4, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Alatise, O.; Wu, R.; Deb, A.; Gonzalez, J.O. Second life potential of electric vehicle power electronics for more circular economies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2025, 210, 115238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Afroozi, M.A.; Gramifar, M.; Hazratifar, B.; Keshvari, M.M.; Razavian, S.B. Optimization of Lithium-Ion Battery Circular Economy in Electric Vehicles in Sustainable Supply Chain. Battery Energy 2025, 4, e20240057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Schulz-Mönninghoff, M.; Neidhardt, M.; Niero, M. What is the contribution of different business processes to material circularity at company-level? A case study for electric vehicle batteries. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 382, 135232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jha, R. Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling in India—Need to Build Local Refining Capabilities to Curb Black Mass Export. EV Reporter, 8 November 2023. Available online: https://www.teriin.org/video/battery-energy-storage-systems-enable-smooth-transition-indias-power-sector (accessed on 31 July 2025).
  52. Gupta, M. Building India’s Battery Circular Economy: Strategies for Sustainable Recycling and Second-Life Solutions—Report. E-Mobility Plus, July 2025. Available online: https://emobilityplus.com/2025/07/17/building-indias-battery-circular-economy-strategies-for-sustainable-recycling-and-second-life-solutions-report/ (accessed on 31 July 2025).
  53. Gupta, U. Tata Chemicals Launches Li-Ion Battery Recycling Operations. PV Magazine. 2 September 2019. Available online: https://www.pv-magazine-india.com/2019/09/02/tata-chemicals-launches-li-ion-battery-recycling-operations/ (accessed on 18 August 2025).
  54. Economic Times Team. Attero to Set Up Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling Plant in Telangana. The Economic Times. 3 November 2022. Available online: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/renewables/attero-to-set-up-lithium-ion-battery-recycling-plant-in-telangana/articleshow/95274357.cms?from=mdr (accessed on 18 November 2025).
  55. CPCB. Battery Waste Management Rules. Central Pollution Control Board. Available online: https://cpcb.nic.in/rules-5/ (accessed on 31 July 2025).
  56. Fleischmann, J.; Hanicke, M.; Horetsky, E.; Ibrahim, D.; Jautelat, S.; Linder, M.; Schaufuss, P.; Torscht, L.; van de Rijt, A. Battery 2030: Resilient, Sustainable, and Circular. McKinsey & Company. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/battery-2030-resilient-sustainable-and-circular (accessed on 1 August 2025).
  57. Gattu, A.; Agrawal, A.; Bagdia, R. Advanced Chemistry Cell Battery Reuse and Recycling Market in India; NITI Aayog: New Delhi, India, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  58. Lico. How EV Battery Recycling Will Shape Sustainable Mobility in India. Licomat. Available online: https://licomat.com/blogs/how-ev-battery-recycling-will-shape-sustainable-mobility-in-india/ (accessed on 2 August 2025).
  59. CII. Around 72–81 GWh of Waste Batteries (~447–517 Thousand Tons) Would Reach Recycling Firms from 2022 to 2030. August 2023. Available online: https://www.cii.in/PressreleasesDetail.aspx?enc=6UYt9FK13Sa34a6GeomlIKIavi8RCedYYNjaH0U1+2vp3HCKU+qX9AWibtxRm9DBPuG6MrfG/0vdPv0kz3mbgw== (accessed on 31 July 2025).
  60. Singh, P. Advancing Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling in India Through Technological Innovations Economic Feasibility and Policy-Driven Sustainability. Int. J. Innov. Res. Electr. Electron. Instrum. Control Eng. 2025, 13, 2321–5526. [Google Scholar]
  61. Jamwal, A.; Patidar, A.; Agrawal, R.; Sharma, M.; Manupati, V.K. Analysis of Barriers in Sustainable Supply Chain Management for Indian Automobile Industries. In Recent Advances in Industrial Production, ICEM 2020; Agrawal, R., Jain, J.K., Yadav, V.S., Manupati, V.K., Varela, L., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Aruleswaran, A.; Muraliraj, J.; Zailani, S. Lean six sigma and sustainable supply chain management: A case study in electric vehicle parts manufacturing. Int. J. Lean Six Sigma 2025. ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Luthra, S.; Luthra, S.; Haleem, A. Hurdles in Implementing Sustainable Supply Chain Management: An Analysis of Indian Automobile Sector. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 189, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ahuchogu, M.C.; Sanyaolu, T.O.; Adeleke, A.G. Exploring sustainable and efficient supply chains innovative models for electric vehicle parts distribution. Glob. J. Res. Sci. Technol. 2024, 2, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Nwankwo, C.O.; Etukudoh, E.A. Exploring Sustainable and Efficient Supply Chains Innovative Models for Electric Vehicle Parts Distribution. Int. J. Adv. Multidiscip. Res. Stud. 2024, 4, 238–243. [Google Scholar]
  66. Mathivathanan, D.; Kannan, D.; Haq, A.N. Sustainable supply chain management practices in Indian automotive industry: A multi-stakeholder view. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 128, 284–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mathivathanan, D.; Agarwal, V.; Mathiyazhagan, K.; Saikouk, T.; Appolloni, A. Modeling the pressures for sustainability adoption in the Indian automotive context. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 342, 130972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kumar, R.; Bangwal, D. An assessment of sustainable supply chain initiatives in Indian automobile industry using PPS method. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2022, 25, 9703–9729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gopal, P.R.C.; Thakkar, J. Sustainable supply chain practices: An empirical investigation on Indian automobile industry. Prod. Plan. Control 2016, 27, 49–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sonar, H.; Mukherjee, A.; Gunasekaran, A.; Singh, R.K. Sustainable supply chain management of automotive sector in context to the circular economy: A strategic framework. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2022, 31, 3635–3648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Niri, A.J.; Poelzer, G.A.; Zhang, S.E.; Rosenkranz, J.; Pettersson, M.; Ghorbani, Y. Sustainability challenges throughout the electric vehicle battery value chain. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 191, 114176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kolasani, S. Revitalizing Mobility: Understanding the Supply Chain Challenges, Opportunities, Strategies, and Resilience in the EV and Automotive Revolution. Int. J. Creat. Res. Comput. Technol. Des. 2024, 6, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  73. Lehtimäki, H.; Karhu, M.; Kotilainen, J.M.; Sairinen, R.; Jokilaakso, A.; Lassi, U.; Huttunen-Saarivirta, E. Sustainability of the use of critical raw materials in electric vehicle batteries: A transdisciplinary review. Environ. Chall. 2024, 16, 100966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Chernova, O.A.; Liu, L.; Wang, X. Role of digitalization of logistics outsourcing in sustainable development of automotive industry in China. R-Economy 2023, 9, 123–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Leo, E.; Bui, Q.; Adelakun, O. Outsourcing for Sustainable Performance: Insights from Two Studies on Achieving Innovation through Information Technology and Business Process Outsourcing. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ciravegna, L.; Romano, P.; Pilkington, A. Outsourcing practices in automotive supply networks: An exploratory study of full-service vehicle suppliers. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2013, 51, 2478–2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Novak, S.; Stern, S. How Does Outsourcing Affect Performance Dynamics? Evidence from the Automobile Industry. Manag. Sci. 2008, 54, 1963–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Rosário, A.T.; Lopes, P.; Rosário, F.S. Sustainability and the Circular Economy Business Development. Sustainability 2024, 16, 6092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Liu, Z.; Clifton, N.; Faqdani, H.; Li, S.; Walpole, G. Implementing circular economy principles: Evidence from multiple cases. Prod. Plan. Control 2024, 36, 1774–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Stahel, W.R. The Performance Economy, 2nd ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  81. Benyus, J.M. Innovation Inspired by Nature; Harper Perennial: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  82. Boulding, K.E. The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth. In Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy, 1st ed.; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  83. Pauli, G. The Blue Economy 3.0: The Marriage of Science, Innovation and Entrepreneurship Creates a New Business Model That Transforms Society; Xlibris Corporation: Bloomington, IN, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  84. Kirchherr, J.; Reike, D.; Hekkert, M. Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 127, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Hariyani, D.; Hariyani, P.; Mishra, S.; Sharma, M.K. Leveraging digital technologies for advancing circular economy practices and enhancing life cycle analysis: A systematic literature review. Waste Manag. Bull. 2024, 2, 69–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hwang, B.; Puntha, P.; Jitanugoon, S. Driven Circular Transformation: Unlocking Sustainable Startup Success Through Co-Creation Dynamics in Circular Economy Ecosystems. Sustain. Dev. 2025, 33, 245–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sobanaa, M.; Prathiviraj, R.; Prathaban, M.; Kiran, G.S.; Selvin, J. Closing the Loop: Circular economy solutions for long-term environmental health. Evol. Earth 2025, 3, 100071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. de Moor, N.W.A. Circular Strategies and Resource Preservation in the Solar Photovoltaics (PV) Industry in the Netherlands; Utrecht University: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  89. Wei, S.; Jiandong, W.; Saleem, H. The impact of renewable energy transition, green growth, green trade and green innovation on environmental quality: Evidence from top 10 green future countries. Front. Environ. Sci. 2023, 10, 1076859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ekins, P.; Aparisi, T.D.; Drummond, P.; Hughes, N.; Lotti, L.; Bleischwitz, R. The Circular Economy: What, Why, How and Where; UCL Discovery: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  91. Yamini, E.; Khazaei, H.; Soltani, M.; Alfraidi, W.; Kyriakopoulos, G.L. Emerging technologies in renewable energy: Risk analysis and major investment strategies. Sustain. Futures 2025, 9, 100736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Matosović, M.D.; Cerović, L. Drivers of sustainability: Economic vs. Environmental priorities in SDG performance. Sustain. Futures 2025, 9, 100639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Fritz, M.M.C. Sustainable Supply Chain Management. In Responsible Consumption and Production, Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals; Filho, W.L., Ed.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Balakrishnan, A.S.; Suresh, J. Green supply chain management in Indian automotive sector. Int. J. Logist. Syst. Manag. 2018, 29, 502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Koberg, E.; Longoni, A. A systematic review of sustainable supply chain management in global supply chains. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 207, 1084–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Panigrahi, S.S.; Bahinipati, B.; Jain, V. Sustainable supply chain management. Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. J. 2019, 30, 1001–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Winter, M.; Knemeyer, A.M. Exploring the integration of sustainability and supply chain management. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2013, 43, 18–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Seuring, S.; Müller, M. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 2008, 16, 1699–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Carter, C.R.; Rogers, D.S. A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2008, 38, 360–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Luthra, S.; Garg, D.; Haleem, A. Empirical Analysis of Green Supply Chain Management Practices in Indian Automobile Industry. J. Inst. Eng. Ser. C 2014, 95, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Suryadevara, R.; Kumar, A.A.; Hariharan, K.; Krishna, B.H. Innovative Sustainable Business Models for the Automobile Industry in India. In Innovation Ecosystems and Sustainable Technologies; Emerald Publishing Limited: Leeds, UK, 2025; pp. 73–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Vashishth, T.K.; Sharma, V.; Sharma, K.K.; Kumar, B.; Chaudhary, S.; Panwar, R. Environmental sustainability and carbon footprint reduction through artificial intelligence-enabled energy management in electric vehicles. In Artificial Intelligence-Empowered Modern Electric Vehicles in Smart Grid Systems; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024; pp. 477–502. [Google Scholar]
  103. Jose, S.A.; Cook, C.A.D.; Palacios, J.; Seo, H.; Ramirez, C.E.T.; Wu, J.; Menezes, P.L. Recent Advancements in Artificial Intelligence in Battery Recycling. Batteries 2024, 10, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Gianvincenzi, M.; Marconi, M.; Mosconi, E.M.; Tola, F.; Tarantino, M. Eco-Design and Battery Regulation: Strategies for Sustainable Lifecycle Management. J. Circ. Econ. 2024, 2, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  105. Musau, E.G. Optimizing Transportation and Distribution for Environmental Sustainability. In Green Supply Chain Management Practice and Principles; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2024; Chapter 5; pp. 84–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. PTI. DPIIT Signs Pact with Ather Energy to Strengthen Ev Manufacturing. The Economic Times, 29 July 2025. Available online: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/renewables/dpiit-signs-pact-with-ather-energy-to-strengthen-ev-manufacturing/articleshow/122967195.cms?from=mdr (accessed on 31 July 2025).
  107. Seth, B. Ather Energy Share Price Gains as Company Signs MoU to Boost EV Ecosystem. Samco Trading App. Available online: https://www.samco.in/knowledge-center/articles/ather-energy-share-price-gains-as-company-signs-mou-to-boost-ev-ecosystem/ (accessed on 31 July 2025).
  108. Toll, M. This Carbon-Negative Massive Megafactory Will Produce an EV Every 2 Seconds. Electrek. Available online: https://electrek.co/2021/03/10/this-carbon-negative-massive-megafactory-will-produce-an-ev-every-2-seconds/ (accessed on 31 July 2025).
  109. Teamet. Ola Electric Doubles Down on Rare Earth-Free Motors to Sidestep China Curbs. The Economic Times, 14 July 2025. Available online: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/startups/ola-electric-doubles-down-on-rare-earth-free-motors-to-sidestep-china-curbs/articleshow/122432305.cms?from=mdr (accessed on 31 July 2025).
  110. Srinivasan, V. Ola’s Future Factory to be Carbon Negative; Sustainability Next: Bengaluru, India, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  111. Kumar, P.; Sahoo, M.; Meshram, A.; Mudholkar, L. Battery Circularity in India: Policy, Regulations, and Implementation Strategies; WRI India: New Delhi, India, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  112. Sushma, M. How India’s Greenwashing Guidelines Can Protect Consumers. Citizen Consumer and Civic Action Group. Available online: https://www.cag.org.in/blogs/how-indias-greenwashing-guidelines-can-protect-consumers (accessed on 12 May 2025).
  113. Arora, N.; Khare, D.; Rathee, P.; Jain, A. Accelerating EV Adoption in India: The Case for Institutionalizing Battery Aadhaar. Natural Resource Defense Council. Available online: https://cleanmobilityshift.com/industry/accelerating-ev-adoption-in-india-the-case-for-institutionalizing-battery-aadhaar/ (accessed on 10 November 2025).
  114. Datta, G. BharatGAIN Report—Urgent Policy Reforms Needed for India EV Battery Recycling by 2030. New Delhi, October 2024. Available online: https://www.business-standard.com/content/press-releases-ani/bharatgain-report-urgent-policy-reforms-needed-for-india-ev-battery-recycling-by-2030-124101600964_1.html (accessed on 31 July 2025).
  115. Sanz-Torró, V.; Calafat-Marzal, C.; Guaita-Martinez, J.M.; Vega, V. Assessment of European countries’ national circular economy policies. J. Environ. Manag. 2025, 373, 123835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Zeng, S.; Ji, M.; Huang, X. An empirical study on the impact of tax incentives on the development of new energy vehicles: Case of China. Energy Policy 2025, 198, 114452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Fan, Y.; Shi, L. The role of government fiscal incentives in green technological innovation: A nonlinear analytical framework. Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. 2025, 103, 104529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Qian, B. Financial subsidies, tax incentives, and new energy vehicle enterprises’ innovation efficiency: Evidence from Chinese listed enterprises. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0293117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Shah, R.V. Financial Incentives for Promotion of Electric Vehicles in India- An Analysis Using the Environmental Policy Framework. Nat. Environ. Pollut. Technol. 2022, 21, 1227–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Abo-Khalil, A.G.; Abdelkareem, M.A.; Sayed, E.T.; Maghrabie, H.M.; Radwan, A.; Rezk, H.; Olabi, A. Electric vehicle impact on energy industry, policy, technical barriers, and power systems. Int. J. Thermofluids 2022, 13, 100134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Surur, S. Greenwashing Guidelines a ‘Welcome Step’, But Needs Enforcement, Says Industry. Mongabay. Available online: https://india.mongabay.com/2024/10/greenwashing-guidelines-a-welcome-step-but-needs-enforcement-says-industry/ (accessed on 14 July 2025).
  122. Mekky, M.F.; Collins, A.R. The Impact of state policies on electric vehicle adoption -A panel data analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 191, 114014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. NITI Aayog. India Climate & Energy Dashboard. Vasudha Foundation. Available online: https://iced.niti.gov.in/ (accessed on 8 September 2025).
  124. Zewe, A. Explained: Generative AI’s Environmental Impact; MIT News: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  125. Bahangulu, J.K.; Owusu-Berko, L. Algorithmic bias, data ethics, and governance: Ensuring fairness, transparency and compliance in AI-powered business analytics applications. World J. Adv. Res. Rev. 2025, 25, 1746–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Roberts, H.; Zhang, J.; Bariach, B.; Cowls, J.; Gilburt, B.; Juneja, P.; Tsamados, A.; Ziosi, M.; Taddeo, M.; Floridi, L. Artificial intelligence in support of the circular economy: Ethical considerations and a path forward. AI Soc. 2022, 39, 1451–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Salami, I.A.; Adesokan-Imran, T.O.; Tiwo, O.J.; Metibemu, O.C.; Olutimehin, A.T.; Olaniyi, O.O. Addressing Bias and Data Privacy Concerns in AI-Driven Credit Scoring Systems Through Cybersecurity Risk Assessment. Asian J. Res. Comput. Sci. 2025, 18, 59–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. WEF. AI for India 2030: A Blueprint for Inclusive Growth and Global Leadership; World Economic Forum: Geneva, Switzerland, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  129. Palaniswamy, S.; Sandhya Devi, R.S.; Saravanan, M.; Anand, M. Social, Economic and Environmental Impact of Electric Vehicles in India. J. Environ. Sci. Manag. 2022, 25, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Naim, A.; Muniasamy, A.; Clementking, A.; Rajkumar, R. Relevance of Green Manufacturing and IoT in Industrial Transformation and Marketing Management; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 395–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Javanmardi, E.; Hoque, M.; Tauheed, A.; Umar, M. Evaluating the Factors Affecting Electric Vehicles Adoption Considering the Sustainable Development Level. World Electr. Veh. J. 2023, 14, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Rauf, M.; Kumar, L.; Zulkifli, S.A.; Jamil, A. Aspects of artificial intelligence in future electric vehicle technology for sustainable environmental impact. Environ. Chall. 2024, 14, 100854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Kapoor, N. The Impact of AI on Enhancing EV Performance and Efficiency; The Statesman: Kolkata, India, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  134. Golovianko, M.; Terziyan, V.; Branytskyi, V.; Malyk, D. Industry 4.0 vs. Industry 5.0: Co-existence, Transition, or a Hybrid. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2023, 217, 102–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Kumar, A.; Bansal, P.; Gupta, A.K.; Choudhari, A. Digital Manufacturing—Artificial Intelligence in Industry 5.0. In Artificial Intelligence and Communication Techniques in Industry 5.0, 1st ed.; Bansal, P., Kumar, R., Kumar, A., Dasig, D.D., Jr., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  136. George, A.S.; George, A.S.H. Industrial Revolution 5.0: The Transformation of the Modern Manufacturing Process to Enable Man and Machine to Work Hand in Hand. J. Seybold Rep. 2020, 15, 214–234. [Google Scholar]
  137. Narkhede, G.B.; Pasi, B.N.; Rajhans, N.; Kulkarni, A. Industry 5.0 and sustainable manufacturing: A systematic literature review. Benchmarking Int. J. 2025, 32, 608–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Capocasale, V.; Bruni, M.E.; Perboli, G. Technological insights on blockchain adoption: The electric vehicle supply chain use case. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 2025, 28, 23–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. da Silva, E.R.; Lohmer, J.; Rohla, M.; Angelis, J. Unleashing the circular economy in the electric vehicle battery supply chain: A case study on data sharing and blockchain potential. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023, 193, 106969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Lu, S.; Serafeim, G. How AI Will Accelerate the Circular Economy; Harvard Business Review: Brighton, MA, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  141. Rangarajan, R.; Murugan, T.K.; Govindaraj, L.; Venkataraman, V.; Shankar, K. AI driven automation for enhancing sustainability efforts in CDP report analysis. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 24266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. van den Bogaert, J.; van Jaarsveld, W. Vendor-managed inventory in practice: Understanding and mitigating the impact of supplier heterogeneity. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2022, 60, 6087–6103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Juned, M.; Farooquie, J.A. VMI adoption in automotive industries: Two different perspectives. Int. J. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2022, 43, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Negri, M.; Biekr, G. Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Passenger Cars in the European Union: A 2025 Update and Key Factors to Consider; International Council on Clean Transportation: Washington, DC, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  145. Hill, N.; Raugei, M.; Pons, A.; Vasileiadis, N.; Ong, H.; Casullo, L. Environmental Challenges Through the Life Cycle of Battery Electric Vehicles; European Parliament: Strasbourg, France, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  146. Dhankhar, S.; Pateer, S.; Kaur, D.H.; Sandhu, D.V. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Shaping the Future of Electric Vehicles. Adv. Consum. Res. 2025, 2, 5291–5299. [Google Scholar]
  147. PTI. Tork Motors Set to Launch KRATOS; The Times of India: New Delhi, India, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  148. Theerdhala, P. Tata Technologies Launches WattSync Platform for EV Battery Passport; The Green Route: London, UK, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  149. Srivastava, P.; Saraswat, V.K. Forecasting Penetration of EV Two-Wheelers in India—A Bottum-Up Analysis; NITI Aayog: New Delhi, India, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  150. Sankar, N.; Vasudevan, S.; Mitra, S. Promoting Clean Energy Usage Through Accelerated Localization of E-Mobility Value Chain; NITI Aayog: New Delhi, India, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  151. Vinodkumar; Singha, N.S. Battery Management System Health Monitoring Using Artificial Intelligence. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Sustainable Emerging Innovations in Engineering and Technology (ICSEIET), Ghaziabad, India, 14–15 September 2023; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2023; pp. 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Bhupathi, H.P.; Chinta, S. Battery Health Monitoring With AI: Creating Predictive Models to Assess Battery Performance and Longevity. ESP J. Eng. Technol. Adv. 2024, 4, 103–112. [Google Scholar]
  153. Sudhapriya, K.; Jaisiva, S. Implementation of artificial intelligence techniques in electric vehicles for battery management system. Int. J. Low-Carbon. Technol. 2025, 20, 590–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Ahangar, S.S.; Abazari, S.R.; Rabbani, M. A region-based model for optimizing charging station location problem of electric vehicles considering disruption—A case study. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 336, 130433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Kaushal, R. India’s Emerging Role in EV Battery Recycling: Creating a Circular Economy; PV Magazine India: New Delhi, India, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  156. Cavus, M.; Dissanayake, D.; Bell, M. Next Generation of Electric Vehicles: AI-Driven Approaches for Predictive Maintenance and Battery Management. Energies 2025, 18, 1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Prenner, S.; Part, F.; Jung-Waclik, S. Barriers and framework conditions for the market entry of second-life lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles. Heliyon 2024, 10, e37423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Roopalatha, H. World EV Day 2025: Steering India Towards a Sustainable Tomorrow. CEO Insights. Available online: https://www.ceoinsightsindia.com/business-inside/world-ev-day-2025-steering-india-towards-a-sustainable-tomorrow-nwid-21672.html (accessed on 14 September 2025).
  159. Ling, Y.; Anan, P. Empirical Analysis and Model to Enhance EV Automobile Market Competitiveness. Lex Localis 2025, 23, 1056–1083. [Google Scholar]
  160. Shang, M.; Baldo, N.C. Profitability and Market Competitiveness of the Electric Vehicles Geely Auto. Int. J. Glob. Econ. Manag. 2025, 7, 204–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Tripathi, S.; Talukder, B. Supply Chain Performance and Profitability in Indian Automobile Industry: Evidence of Segmental Difference. Glob. Bus. Rev. 2023, 24, 371–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Khan, R.; Islam, T. Closing the Productivity Gap in Electric Vehicle Manufacturing: Challenges and Solutions. SSRN Electron. J. 2024, 1, 223–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Czarnitzki, D.; Lepers, R.; Pellens, M. Adoption of Circular Economy Innovations: The Role of Artificial Intelligence; ZEW—Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research: Mannheim, Germany, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Feng, D. Research on Quality Inspection and Monitoring of Electric Vehicles under Green Energy Vision. MATEC Web Conf. 2024, 399, 00012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Sen, S.; Savitskie, K.; Mahto, R.V.; Kumar, S.; Khanin, D. Strategic flexibility in small firms. J. Strateg. Mark. 2023, 31, 1053–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Chirra, S.; Raut, R.D.; Kumar, D. Barriers to sustainable supply chain flexibility during sales promotions. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2021, 59, 6975–6993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Kumar B, S.; Mohan, S.T. A Study on Customer Satisfaction Towards Electronic Cars in Kerala. Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2024, 12, 3818–3820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Ghosh, A.; Dey, A.K. Electrifying Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach in the Indian Four-Wheeler Electric Vehicle Industry. Srusti Management Review 2024, XVII, 24–37. [Google Scholar]
  169. Cheng, S.; Lee, C.W. The Effect of Electric Vehicle Product Quality on Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty: Focusing on the Chinese Market. Acad. Soc. Glob. Bus. Adm. 2023, 20, 82–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Kohli, A.; Singh, R. An assessment of customers’ satisfaction for emerging technologies in passenger cars using Kano model. Vilakshan—XIMB J. Manag. 2021, 18, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Ferreira, J.C.; Esperança, M. Enhancing Sustainable Last-Mile Delivery: The Impact of Electric Vehicles and AI Optimization on Urban Logistics. World Electr. Veh. J. 2025, 16, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Williment, C. Amazon India Surpasses 10,000 EVs in Sustainability Drive; The Sustainability Magazine: London, UK, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  173. Min, H.; Fang, Y.; Wu, X.; Lei, X.; Chen, S.; Teixeira, R.; Zhu, B.; Zhao, X.; Xu, Z. A fault diagnosis framework for autonomous vehicles with sensor self-diagnosis. Expert. Syst. Appl. 2023, 224, 120002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Hosmani, A.; DJ, P.M. Impact of AI on Sustainable Circular Economy: Harnessing Artificial Intelligence. EPRA Int. J. Res. Dev. 2025, 10, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Munonye, W.C.; Ajonye, G.O.; Ahonsi, S.O.; Munonye, D.I.; Akinloye, O.A.; Chigozie, I.O. Governing circular intelligence: How AI-driven policy tools can accelerate the circular economy transition. Clean. Responsible Consum. 2025, 19, 100324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Pandey, K. Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Electric Vehicle Ecosystems: Challenges, Opportunities, and Models for Accelerated Adoption. Int. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. Manag. 2024, 5, 3659. [Google Scholar]
  177. Nindwani, A. How Can the Environmental and Social Impacts of the EV Supply Chain, Particularly in Relation to the Sourcing of Critical Raw Materials, Be Assessed and Addressed through Responsible Sourcing Practices and International Cooperation? IOSR J. Bus. Manag. 2024, 26, 24–38. [Google Scholar]
  178. Wirba, A.V. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Role of Government in promoting CSR. J. Knowl. Econ. 2023, 15, 7428–7454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Moloney, P.; Raad, K. The Disruptive and Transformative Role of AI in the Circular Economy Transition; Ramboll: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  180. EEA. Circular Economy Country Profile 2024—Germany; EEA: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  181. Raut, S.; Hossain, N.U.I.; Kouhizadeh, M.; Fazio, S.A. Application of artificial intelligence in circular economy: A critical analysis of the current research. Sustain. Futures 2025, 9, 100784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Ahmed, S. Artificial Intelligence and the Circular Economy in Africa: Key Considerations for a Just Transition; Research ICT Africa: Cape Town, South Africa, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  183. Roy, A. National Strategy for AI; NITI Aayog: New Delhi, India, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  184. Olawade, D.B.; Fapohunda, O.; Wada, O.Z.; Usman, S.O.; Ige, A.O.; Ajisafe, O.; Oladapo, B.I. Smart waste management: A paradigm shift enabled by artificial intelligence. Waste Manag. Bull. 2024, 2, 244–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Andeobu, L.; Wibowo, S.; Grandhi, S. Artificial intelligence applications for sustainable solid waste management practices in Australia: A systematic review. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 834, 155389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Singagerda, F.S.; Dewi, D.A.; Trisnawati, S.; Septarina, L.; Dhika, M.R. Towards a Circular Economy: Integration of AI in Waste Management for Sustainable Urban Growth. J. Lifestyle SDGs Rev. 2024, 5, e02642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Fang, B.; Yu, J.; Chen, Z.; Osman, A.I.; Farghali, M.; Ihara, I.; Hamza, E.H.; Rooney, D.W.; Yap, P.-S. Artificial intelligence for waste management in smart cities: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2023, 21, 1959–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Mulè, L. Revolutionizing Waste Management: The Role of AI in Building Sustainable Practices. AI for Good. Available online: https://aiforgood.itu.int/revolutionizing-waste-management-the-role-of-ai-in-building-sustainable-practices/ (accessed on 15 August 2025).
  189. Resmi, M. The Influence of AI on Sustainable Waste Management. Infolks. Available online: https://www.infolks.info/blog/the-influence-of-ai-on-sustainable-waste-management/ (accessed on 3 June 2025).
  190. Gahlot, N.; Nautiyal, O. AI-driven solutions for sustainable E-Waste Management: Reducing Environmental Impact on Natural Ecosystems. Indian. J. For. 2024, 47, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. DMR. Digital Circular Economy Market by Offering. Dec. 2023. Available online: https://dimensionmarketresearch.com/report/digital-circular-economy-market/ (accessed on 15 April 2025).
  192. Dao, S.V.T.; Le, T.M.; Tran, H.M.; Pham, H.V.; Vu, M.T.; Chu, T. Integrating artificial intelligence for sustainable waste management: Insights from machine learning and deep learning. Watershed Ecol. Environ. 2025, 7, 353–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Chien, C.-F.; Aviso, K.; Tseng, M.-L.; Fujii, M.; Lim, M.K. Solid waste management in emerging economies: Opportunities and challenges for reuse and recycling. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023, 188, 106635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Zhou, Y. AI-driven digital circular economy with material and energy sustainability for industry 4.0. Energy AI 2025, 20, 100508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Kumar, S.; Raut, R.D.; Queiroz, M.M.; Narkhede, B.E. Mapping the barriers of AI implementations in the public distribution system: The Indian experience. Technol. Soc. 2021, 67, 101737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Chigbu, B.I. Advancing sustainable development through circular economy and skill development in EV lithium-ion battery recycling: A comprehensive review. Front. Sustain. 2024, 5, 1409498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Weick, M.; Ray, N. Beyond Batteries: Unlocking the Value of Circularity in Electric Vehicles. EY. Available online: https://www.ey.com/en_us/insights/climate-change-sustainability-services/beyond-batteries-electric-vehicle-circularity (accessed on 9 July 2025).
  198. Hendrix, C.S. India’s Lithium Discovery Could Boost Green Energy but Creates Problems in the Region. Peterson Institute for International Economics. Available online: https://www.piie.com/blogs/realtime-economics/2023/indias-lithium-discovery-could-boost-green-energy-creates-problems (accessed on 29 August 2025).
  199. Safarzadeh, H.; Di Maria, F. Progress, Challenges and Opportunities in Recycling Electric Vehicle Batteries: A Systematic Review Article. Batteries 2025, 11, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Kumar, V.; Kidwai, K. Your EV Battery’s Second Act Can Power India’s Future. Xynteo. Available online: https://xynteo.com/your-ev-batterys-second-act-can-power-indias-future/ (accessed on 12 June 2025).
  201. Kaicker, A.; Mathur, P.; Kandula, A.; Kaur, S. Industry-Academia Interaction in India: The Current Scenario and the Future. J. Ecophysiol. Occup. Health 2023, 23, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Jagirdar, R.; Pathak, C. AI-driven transportation solutions: Lessons from developed nations for emerging economies. J. Public Transp. Syst. 2025, 4, 15–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Srivastava, A.; Kumar, R.R.; Chakraborty, A.; Mateen, A.; Narayanamurthy, G. Design and selection of government policies for electric vehicles adoption: A global perspective. Transp. Res. E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2022, 161, 102726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Alamerew, Y.A.; Brissaud, D. Modelling reverse supply chain through system dynamics for realizing the transition towards the circular economy: A case study on electric vehicle batteries. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 254, 120025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Paladugula, A.L.; Kholod, N.; Chaturvedi, V.; Ghosh, P.P.; Pal, S.; Clarke, L.; Evans, M.; Kyle, P.; Koti, P.N.; Parikh, K.; et al. A multi-model assessment of energy and emissions for India’s transportation sector through 2050. Energy Policy 2018, 116, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Aldossary, M. Enhancing Urban Electric Vehicle (EV) Fleet Management Efficiency in Smart Cities: A Predictive Hybrid Deep Learning Framework. Smart Cities 2024, 7, 3678–3704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Balaji Nanda Kumar Reddy, K.; Pratyusha, D.; Sravanthi, B.; Jayakiran Reddy, E. Recent AI Applications in Electrical Vehicles for Sustainability. Int. J. Mech. Eng. 2024, 11, 50–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Rajendran, S.; Prakash, C.; Shakir, M.; Alwetaishi, M.; Dhairiyasamy, R.; Rajendran, P.; Lee, I.E. Enhancing competitiveness in India’s electric vehicle industry: Impact of advanced manufacturing technologies and workforce development. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 15647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Hart, S.L. A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1995, 20, 986–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Rebs, T.; Brandenburg, M.; Seuring, S.; Stohler, M. Stakeholder influences and risks in sustainable supply chain management: A comparison of qualitative and quantitative studies. Bus. Res. 2018, 11, 197–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Williams, Z.; Lueg, J.E.; Taylor, R.D.; Cook, R.L. Why all the changes? Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2009, 39, 595–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Cardenas-Rubio, J. Measuring Industry 5.0: Overcoming Challenges with AI-Driven Insights. Bridges5.0. Available online: https://bridges5-0.eu/measuring-industry-5-0-overcoming-challenges-with-ai-driven-insights/ (accessed on 17 July 2025).
  213. Dixson-Decleve, S. Industry 5.0: A Transformative Vision for Europe; The European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  214. Venturini, F. Circular Economy and Zero Waste for Environmental Education. Semest. Di Studi E Ric. Di Geogr. 2021, XXXIII, 143–161. [Google Scholar]
  215. Kopnina, H. Circular economy and Cradle to Cradle in educational practice. J. Integr. Environ. Sci. 2018, 15, 119–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Morlet, A.; Ma, E.; Pandya, C. Artificial Intelligence and the Circular Economy. 2019. Available online: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/artificial-intelligence-and-the-circular-economy (accessed on 12 May 2025).
  217. Shishodia, P. Creating a Circular Economy Through AI. Capgemini. Available online: https://www.capgemini.com/insights/expert-perspectives/creating-a-circular-economy-through-ai/ (accessed on 16 September 2025).
  218. Johansson, G.; Harris, O. Exploring the Impact of AI on Sustainable Practices in Electric Vehicle Manufacturing. SSRN April 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Jensen, H.H. Why You Must Master the Circular Economy and AI by 2030 to Stay Competitive. Weforum. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/08/why-you-must-master-the-circular-economy-and-ai-to-stay-competitive-by-2030/ (accessed on 19 September 2025).
  220. Sharma, H.; Sohani, N. Modelling the leagile enablers of supply chain management in Indian automobile sector. Int. J. Soc. Syst. Sci. 2022, 14, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  221. Meena, P.L.; Katiyar, R.; Kumar, G. Supplier performance and selection from sustainable supply chain performance perspective. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 2022, 72, 2420–2445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Sharma, M.; Raut, R.D.; Sahu, A.K.; Sahu, N.K.; Antony, J.; Tortorella, G.L. Decision-making framework for supplier selection using an integrated MCDM approach in a lean-agile-resilient-green environment: Evidence from Indian automotive sector. TQM J. 2022, 35, 964–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Kilari, S.D. Use Artificial Intelligence into Facility Design and Layout Planning Work in Manufacturing Facility. Eur. J. Artif. Intell. Mach. Learn. 2025, 4, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Digalwar, A.K.; Thomas, R.G.; Rastogi, A. Evaluation of Factors for Sustainable Manufacturing of Electric Vehicles in India. Procedia CIRP 2021, 98, 505–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Imarcgroup. Impact of AI in Indian Electric Vehicle (EV) Industry. Imarcgroup. Available online: https://www.imarcgroup.com/insight/impact-of-ai-in-indian-electric-vehicle-industry (accessed on 28 August 2025).
  226. Chhabra, A. Artificial Intelligence and The Circular Economy: Understanding Effects, Practices & Initiatives. Schneider Electric. Available online: https://blog.se.com/sustainability/2021/12/22/artificial-intelligence-and-the-circular-economy-understanding-effects-practices-initiatives/ (accessed on 14 August 2025).
  227. Alshehri, M.; Alothman, N.; Leal-Arcas, R. Electric Vehicles, Artificial Intelligence, and Climate Policy. Clean Energy Sustain. 2025, 3, 10003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The CE (Left) and linear economy (Right) [Source: Authors].
Figure 1. The CE (Left) and linear economy (Right) [Source: Authors].
Wevj 16 00638 g001
Figure 2. Green SCM in IE2W industry [Source: Authors].
Figure 2. Green SCM in IE2W industry [Source: Authors].
Wevj 16 00638 g002
Figure 3. Interrelationship: AI and the CE [Source: Authors].
Figure 3. Interrelationship: AI and the CE [Source: Authors].
Wevj 16 00638 g003
Figure 4. The sustainability paradox and AI benefits to the IE2W industry [Source: Authors].
Figure 4. The sustainability paradox and AI benefits to the IE2W industry [Source: Authors].
Wevj 16 00638 g004
Figure 5. Conceptual diagram for AI role in CE and Sustainability of IE2W industry.
Figure 5. Conceptual diagram for AI role in CE and Sustainability of IE2W industry.
Wevj 16 00638 g005
Table 1. Search strings, inclusion criteria, and results. (a) Search String 1: Title-ABS-Key (“Artificial Intelligence” OR “Machine Learning” OR “AI”) AND Title-ABS-Key (“Circular Economy” OR “Sustain*” OR “Sustenance” OR “Recycling”) AND Title-ABS-Key (“Electric Vehicle*” OR “Battery Recycling”); Inclusions: English, January 2016 to present (November 2025). (b) Search String 2: Title-ABS-Key (“Artificial Intelligence” OR “Machine Learning” OR “AI”) AND Title-ABS-Key (“Circular Economy” OR “Sustain*” OR “Sustenance” OR “Recycling”) AND Title (“Electric Vehicle*” OR “Battery Recycling”); Inclusions: English, January 2016 to present (November 2025).
Table 1. Search strings, inclusion criteria, and results. (a) Search String 1: Title-ABS-Key (“Artificial Intelligence” OR “Machine Learning” OR “AI”) AND Title-ABS-Key (“Circular Economy” OR “Sustain*” OR “Sustenance” OR “Recycling”) AND Title-ABS-Key (“Electric Vehicle*” OR “Battery Recycling”); Inclusions: English, January 2016 to present (November 2025). (b) Search String 2: Title-ABS-Key (“Artificial Intelligence” OR “Machine Learning” OR “AI”) AND Title-ABS-Key (“Circular Economy” OR “Sustain*” OR “Sustenance” OR “Recycling”) AND Title (“Electric Vehicle*” OR “Battery Recycling”); Inclusions: English, January 2016 to present (November 2025).
(a)
SourceAllOnly India/IndianDocument TypeAllOnly India/Indian
Journal458107Article451103
Conference Proceedings286144Conference Paper335167
Book7149Book Chapter9161
Book Series6131
Trade Journal10
Total877331 877331
(b)
SourceAllOnly India/IndianDocument TypeAllOnly India/Indian
Journal20057Article19957
Conference Proceedings13378Conference Paper15084
Book2723Book Chapter3730
Book Series2613
Trade Journal
Total386171 386171
Table 2. GSCM practices pertinent to the IE2W sector.
Table 2. GSCM practices pertinent to the IE2W sector.
GSCM Practice, Criticality, and Application in IE2W IndustryImpact and Significance
Reverse Logistics and Green Recycling (maximum criticality): Set up collection centers and processing infrastructure for EoLEVBs, including AI-driven sorting to recover critical materials (Li, Ni, Co), or allocate packs for “second-life” applications (stationary storage).Closes the loop (CE). Reduces imports of critical minerals and hazardous e-waste landfilling [101,102].
Green Procurement and Vendor Management (important): Mandating environmental standards (e.g., ISO 14001 certification) for upstream suppliers providing cells, motors, and semiconductor chips, and localizing the component supply chain.Reduces emissions and mitigates geopolitical/ethical risks in mineral sourcing. Fosters reliable, high-quality domestic vendor partnerships [103].
Eco-Design (Design for Disassembly) (important): Designing the E2W battery pack for easy disassembly, modularity, and repairability.Reduces material consumption and lowers cost and energy for future recycling and repairs [104].
Green Manufacturing and Energy Sourcing (important): Utilizing renewable energy (solar, wind) in OEMs’ and major vendors’ production facilities. Lean manufacturing to minimize water/material waste during assembly (e.g., frame welding, painting).Decarbonizes the production process. Supports push for manufacturing closer to renewable power sources [102].
Green Transportation (important): Optimizing inbound and outbound logistics through route optimization and load consolidation.Reduces fuel consumption and road emissions [105].
Table 3. The AI-EV sustainability paradox: risks and mitigation strategies.
Table 3. The AI-EV sustainability paradox: risks and mitigation strategies.
AI Risk/ChallengeImpactMitigation Strategy
Environmental CostMore carbon emissions, heavy water use, and fossil fuel-based electricity for data centers [128].Use of renewable energy sources to power data centers and development of more energy-efficient AI models [128].
Algorithmic BiasDiscriminatory outcomes in some applications reinforce societal biases [129].Development of fair LLMs; robust data ethics frameworks and human oversight [129].
Data Privacy and CybersecurityData breaches, unauthorized access, and misuse of personal data collected from vehicles and charging networks [129].Implement privacy-by-design principles, strong cybersecurity risk assessment frameworks, and strict regulatory compliance [129].
Table 4. AI-optimization of the supply chain at each stage of the life cycle for IE2W.
Table 4. AI-optimization of the supply chain at each stage of the life cycle for IE2W.
StageSub-StageSupply Chain Optimization Through AI
Raw Materials Acquisition Stage (Cradle)Material depletion/toxicityEnables pragmatic and forecasted demand, and prevents overstocking.
Energy consumption (primary)Monitors consumption at all stages of battery material refining to prevent waste.
Manufacturing and Assembly StageInitial GHG emissions (carbon debt)Forecast parts demand through optimizing vendor-managed inventory (VMI) [142,143]. Track inventory. Identify risks, ensuring smooth logistics and procurement. Monitoring EV manufacturing emissions (mostly from the battery) to optimize process [144,145].
Geographical factorSetting up manufacturing plants in the proximity of power plants. Promotes vendor-managed inventory (VMI) for lower supply chain burden.
Operation/Use StageTailpipe emissions (air quality), battery management and parity pointAlthough driving emissions are zero, onboard diagnostics (OBDs) detect anomalies and initiate timely corrective action to reduce the spares requirement. AI-powered BMS enables real-time energy prediction, adaptive charging, degradation tracking, improving battery life, and reducing total energy consumed by E2W. Will help with the faster achievement of parity point, i.e., the point in lifecycle where E2W will offset higher initial manufacturing emissions vis-à-vis ICE vehicles.
End-of-Life (EoL) Stage (Grave)Battery managementAutomated recycling (explained in detail later).
Table 5. Examples of AI applications in the IE2W industry.
Table 5. Examples of AI applications in the IE2W industry.
SubjectExampleApplicationImpact
Predictive Maintenance in E2Ws, OEM systemsAther Energy and Tork Motors have integrated AI into their vehicles’ core systemsAther’s AI-driven predictive maintenance (PdM) and AtherStack [146].
Tork Motors’ TIROS—Tork Intuitive Response System) [147].
AI analysis of various data points to predict potential battery/component failure enables maintenance alerts for riders and service centers, reducing unscheduled breakdowns, extending component lifespan, and improving safety.
In the supply chain, it helps manufacturers optimize component sourcing and vehicle design.
Digital Battery PassportsTata Technologies [148]WATTSync
While not purely AI, it generates data for AI models to monitor battery health, compliance, and end-of-life logistics.
Usable in IE2W, but since released only in Aug 2025, not yet deployed by any 2W company.
Supply Chain Impact: enhances traceability of battery for quality control, warranty claims, and planning for reuse/recycling volumes.
AI in Policy DevelopmentNiti Aayog [149]Agent-Based Model (ABM) to simulate decision-making of vehicle buyers.
Data: scenario analysis to estimate the penetration level of E2Ws under different policies, subsidy levels, or charging infrastructure availability.
Helps to refine policy and regulations.
Demand Forecasting using MLVAHAN data (2018–2024)Gradient Boosted Trees (GBT) and Random Forest (RF).
To optimize SSCM, ensuring raw material procurement (like batteries) and production capacity align with market uptake.
Table 6. Other AI applications for IE2W and their sustainability impact.
Table 6. Other AI applications for IE2W and their sustainability impact.
AI ApplicationMechanismSustainability Impact
AI-driven BMS and smart chargingReal-time energy prediction, adaptive charging, degradation tracking, improving battery life [150], lowering waste, and reducing energy consumed [151,152], e.g., E-Vega Mobility Labs’ AI-powered ‘EV Doctor’ to diagnose battery health in 15 min (which earlier took days) [125].Enhances safety and overall performance [152,153], replicable by the IE2W industry. Extends battery life by up to 30% and reduces maintenance costs by up to 25% [150]. Optimizes charging station locations and manages charging loads to support grid stability and reduce waiting times [154].
Battery RepurposingData-driven assessment of residual capacity (70–80%) in EoLEVBs.Enables second-life applications for grid storage, preventing waste and creating value [129].
AI-enabled RecyclingAI can help implement the CE model, promoting “5Rs”—Reduce, Reuse, Repurpose, Remanufacture, and Recycle—for risk mitigation [155]. For non-repurposable batteries, automated resource recovery, through advanced multi-sensor technology and X-ray imaging, identifies and classifies each type of battery with >98% accuracy [155].
  • Meeting up to 80% of India’s Li, Co needs from recycling by 2030, saving approx. USD 2 billion a year on imports [156].
  • Can repurpose retired LIBs [129], which retain 70–80% of residual capacity, boosting second-life productivity [129,156,157].
  • Facilitates raw material recovery.
  • Increases strategic/geopolitical resilience [156].
Predictive maintenance and manufacturingIE2W OEMs—especially giants like Ola Electric—deploy AI for predictive maintenance analytics, early defect detection in manufacturing, and supply chain optimization.Improves yields, lowers energy consumption, and minimizes waste through digital twins and robotics [156].
Grid integration and demand managementOptimizes demand management, aligns charging with renewable energy, and leverages vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technologies.Prevents grid overloads and promotes the use of green energy by automatically shifting charging to off-peak hours [141].
Sustainable mobility and user experienceAI-driven route-planning apps, OTA updates, ADAS, and real-time system diagnostics.Reduces energy use, boosts safety, and improves user experience [158].
AI for sustainabilityOptimizes resource allocation and predicts carbon emission levels [141].Optimizes supply chain sustainability.
AI in performance of the IEV/IE2W industryImpacts the parameters used to measure performance of the IEV/IE2W industry, like profitability [159,160,161], productivity [162], innovation [163], quality [164], flexibility [165,166], and consumer satisfaction [167,168,169,170].Enables review of supply chain processes to optimize manufacturing and to promote CE and sustainability.
Revolutionizing fleet management and urban mobilityAI-powered route planning and fleet coordination, especially in urban logistics [171], e.g., Amazon India is surpassing their goal of 10,000 EVs in India a year ahead of schedule [172]; and Bounce Infinity’s use of AI in fleet management [173].Reduces delivery time by 15–20% and energy consumption by 10–25%, leading to up to a 40% decrease in emissions for last-mile logistics.
Table 7. Recommendations for the short, medium, and long terms.
Table 7. Recommendations for the short, medium, and long terms.
TermRecommendationsImpact
For Government/Academia
ShortLocal R&D and human capital: Initiatives like “AI for India 2030” and the NITI Aayog report’s recommendations [150] for incentivizing investments in local R&D for both EV technology and ethical AI.Will reduce dependency on imported technology and help the country become a global innovation leader.
MediumBridge the skill gap: Universities and industry must create curricula on synergies of IEV/IE2W and AI, moving beyond automotive engineering [201].Will produce world-class specialists in BMS, embedded electronics, and data analytics [159].
Robust regulatory frameworks: To promote AI transparency, mitigate algorithmic bias, and ensure data privacy [125,127]. Policy initiatives to refine BWMR implementation, standardize battery design, implement a battery-tracking system, address disincentives, and facilitate second use of batteries.Will increase trust.
Will promote EoLEVB recovery for second life.
LongInfrastructure through Public–Private Partnerships (PPP): To increase charging stations, using renewable energy sources for grid power [171]; for infrastructure and technology investments [195]; and for investment in AI R&D, government incentives for digital infrastructure, and targeted training [195,202].Will promote E2W adoption and transition. R&D will usher in cleaner technologies. Skill development will increase awareness and standard of personnel involved in AI adoption in IE2W.
Foster public awareness: To build support for the transition [203], apart from understanding the importance of correct battery disposal.Will address resistance from established industries and ensure that societal transition is as smooth as the technological one.
Ethical AI deployment: Government must regulate to ensure that companies implement robust data ethics frameworks and privacy-by-design principles [125].Will build consumer confidence.
For IE2W Industry
ShortInvest in a CE: IE2W industries to incentivize R&D and training, factoring AI, from product design to supply chain management (including an efficient reverse logistics system), battery health diagnostics, standardized battery labeling/tracking, and automated recycling technologies [50,204].Will reduce their reliance on imports of critical minerals and create profitable avenues from second-life applications and material recovery [129].
Embrace ethical AI deployment: Implement robust data ethics frameworks and privacy-by-design principles [125].Will build trust and transparency.
MediumPrioritize a fleet-first adoption model: As brought out [172].Economically driven approach to provide a proof of concept for wider adoption by IE2W industry.
Public awareness: The IE2W industry can launch awareness campaigns to address public concerns regarding AI ethical deployment.Will build support for the transition [203].
LongVertical integration in manufacturingWill lead to reduced imports and self-sufficiency.
Table 8. Thematic depiction of gaps from the literature review.
Table 8. Thematic depiction of gaps from the literature review.
ThemeGapReferences
Coverage of a specific subject areaNeed for a study specific to the application of AI to the CE of the IEV/IE2W sector, rather than generic to the automobile sector or industry.[89,128,129,130,131,132,134,135,136,137,138,139,142,144,145]
Need to study specific effects of AI on environmental aspects of the IEV/IE2W industry to include waste management, pollution control, environmental impact of OEMs, and actual environmental impact of their products.[6,7,8,9,10,12,13,14,15,16,19,21,22,23,24,205]
Need to focus investigation on a particular type of industry for consistency in results, which, in this study, is the IE2W industry.[95,96,97,98,99]
PolicyNeed for a study specific to examining existing government policy framing mechanisms, and the impact of AI in this, especially for policy pertaining to the IEV/IE2W industry.[55,111,112,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,173,174,175,176,177,206]
Need to research the impact of AI on job creation or loss of jobs in the IEV/IE2W industry.[154,194,199]
Need to research the impact of AI on R&D to the extent it meets the requirement of decreased dependence on lithium, a basic raw material for batteries, impacting the overall logistics and supply chain.[127,153,155]
TechnologicalNeed to research differences in the AI applications in the automobile ICE industries vis-à-vis the IEV/IE2W industry.[89,90,91,92,93,94,100,101,103,104,105,207]
Need to research differences between AI applications in the vendor partnerships and supply chain management in automobile ICE industries vis-à-vis IEV/IE2W industry.[71,72,74,76,139,144,145]
Need to study specific effects of AI on the parameters of profit, innovation, flexibility, quality control, and consumer delight in the IEV/IE2W industry.[52,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,196,208]
Need for an India-specific study on the application of AI on the IE2W industry to study not only the benefits but also the pitfalls of AI and how and by whom these could be countered.[124,175,176,177]
Need for study on the AI impacts on vendor partnerships and sustainable supply chain for the IEV/IE2W sector.[71,72,74,76,139,144,145]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Achal, D.K.; Vijaya, G.S. AI-Enhanced Circular Economy and Sustainability in the Indian Electric Two-Wheeler Industry: A Review. World Electr. Veh. J. 2025, 16, 638. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16110638

AMA Style

Achal DK, Vijaya GS. AI-Enhanced Circular Economy and Sustainability in the Indian Electric Two-Wheeler Industry: A Review. World Electric Vehicle Journal. 2025; 16(11):638. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16110638

Chicago/Turabian Style

Achal, Dilip K., and Gangoor S. Vijaya. 2025. "AI-Enhanced Circular Economy and Sustainability in the Indian Electric Two-Wheeler Industry: A Review" World Electric Vehicle Journal 16, no. 11: 638. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16110638

APA Style

Achal, D. K., & Vijaya, G. S. (2025). AI-Enhanced Circular Economy and Sustainability in the Indian Electric Two-Wheeler Industry: A Review. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 16(11), 638. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16110638

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop