Next Article in Journal
Failure Behavior and Mechanism of Solder Joint Under Thermal Mechanical Coupling Loads
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Niobium and Stainless Steel Electropolishing Solutions by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Using a Porous Silicon Substrate and a Non-Contact Pretreatment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synaptic Plasticity and Memory Retention in ZnO–CNT Nanocomposite Optoelectronic Synaptic Devices
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 19
Issue 3
10.3390/ma19030638
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Filtered Cathodic Vacuum Arc Deposition for Inkjet-Printed OLED Encapsulation

by
Zhuo Gao
1,2,*,
Songju Li
2,
Lei Wang
1,*,
Lin Chen
3,
Xianwen Sun
2 and
Dong Fu
2
1
State Key Laboratory of Luminescent Materials and Devices, Institute of Polymer Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
2
Guangdong Juhua Printed Display Technology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510700, China
3
College of Nuclear Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2026, 19(3), 638; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19030638
Submission received: 4 January 2026 / Revised: 29 January 2026 / Accepted: 2 February 2026 / Published: 6 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Photoelectric Materials: Preparation, Characterization, Properties, and Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

To improve the low deposition rate of atomic layer deposition (ALD), we introduced filtered cathodic vacuum arc (FCVA) technology for the high-rate deposition of Al2O3 films. The FCVA-Al2O3 process achieved a deposition rate of 15 nm/min, which is approximately an order of magnitude higher than that of conventional ALD. This process does not involve hydrogen, preventing hydrogen ion penetration and thereby ensuring the high stability of the oxide TFT backplane. FCVA-Al2O3 films were integrated with inkjet-printed (IJP) organic layers to form a hybrid thin-film encapsulation (TFE) structure for OLEDs. The resulting laminated encapsulation exhibited excellent water vapor barrier properties (WVTR, Water Vapor Transmission Rate of 1.2 × 10−4 g/m2/day), demonstrating the great potential of FCVA for packaging high-throughput and high-performance flexible electronics. In addition to evaluating barrier properties (surface roughness, residual stress, and WVTR) to assess the suitability of TFE, the impact of FCVA technology was assessed via oxide thin-film transistor (TFT) electrical performance and OLED device reliability tests. The electrical properties of oxide TFTs show no significant degradation post-encapsulation, while OLED performance, despite a slight increase in current efficiency, remains effectively unchanged. Additionally, the lifetime of OLED devices reached 300 h under accelerated aging conditions (85 °C, 85% relative humidity), which is nearly twice that of devices without FCVA-Al2O3 encapsulation.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

As display technologies have developed, OLED technology has become widely used in various fields. Benefiting from features such as self-emission, high contrast, a wide viewing angle, fast response, low power consumption, ultra-thin design, and a flexible display, various kinds of OLED display products are emerging [1]. In particular, flexible OLED products such as curved monitors, foldable mobile phones, and rollable TVs are very popular [2]. Inkjet printing is one of the most promising manufacturing technologies for next-generation flexible OLED display technologies due to its advantages of a high material utilization rate, low cost, and ease of large-area production. However, challenges regarding the lifetime and performance stability of printed OLED devices still remain, which are one of the key factors hindering their large-scale mass production [3,4]. To accelerate the development of flexible display technology, it is necessary to not only synthesize new types of organic light-emitting materials with high performance and a long lifetime but also develop efficient TFE technology, with good anti-bending and encapsulation performance [5,6]. TFE technology protects flexible OLED devices by alternately forming a laminated structure with organic and inorganic films, which can effectively reduce the thickness of the device and ensure the flexibility of OLED devices. Compared with traditional glass encapsulation, it is more suitable for ultra-thin and ultra-light flexible OLED displays [7].
In the early stages, K. Yamashita’s research group from Nagoya University in Japan fabricated polymer encapsulation films using plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD), which increased the lifetime of OLED devices by four times [8]. A. Heeger and others from the University of California, Santa Barbara, United States, fabricated a water vapor barrier layer with the use of spin-coating CytopTM (a perchlorinated polymer), which increased the half-life of the devices by more than five times [9]. In Germany, Riedl’s research group developed Al2O3/ZrO2 nano-laminated vapor and oxygen barrier layer technology using ALD technology, which is able to significantly eliminate pinholes and surface defects in the encapsulation film and reduce the corrosion of Al2O3. The Al2O3 layer deposited using ALD was dense and smooth, and a WVTR of 4.7 × 10−5 g/m2/day was achieved with a thickness of only 130 nm under 70% relative humidity and 70 °C conditions [10]. Vitex Systems in the United States developed BarixTM encapsulation technology, which forms a barrier to prevent water vapor and oxygen from penetrating into flexible OLED devices by alternately depositing acrylic resin monomers and inorganic films. The performance of the BarixTM barrier layer can be adjusted by changing the number of layers and the composition of the acrylic resin and inorganic layers in the film coating. The BarixTM film had a transmittance of more than 80% in the visible-light range, a surface roughness of less than 10 nm, and a WVTR of 10−4~10−6 g/m2/day [11].
ALD technology sequentially introduces precursors into the reaction chamber, enabling uniform adsorption and simultaneous reaction on the substrate surface to form atomic-scale bonds [12]. This cyclic process ensures the growth of one atomic layer per cycle, resulting in highly uniform and dense thin films [13,14,15]. The method achieves precise nanometer-scale control over the thickness of the barrier that effectively blocks water vapor and oxygen [16,17]. However, ALD-Al2O3 suffers from low deposition rates, and hydrogen incorporation during the process is unavoidable. As a common impurity in oxide TFTs, hydrogen ions (both positive and negative) can accumulate in the channel region, degrading device performance and electrical reliability [18,19,20].
FCVA technology generates plasma through the evaporation of a metal cathode via discharge. The cathode material ions fly along the magnetic filter duct, finally arrive at the surface of the substrate, and then react with oxygen to form metal oxides [21]. Since the magnetic filter duct can filter out large particle droplets and other impurities, what reaches the substrate is a high-purity and high-concentration plasma of the cathode material [22,23]. Compared with ALD, FCVA enables faster, large-area deposition of thin films with excellent step coverage, compactness, and adjustable stress. Notably, the hydrogen-free nature of FCVA-Al2O3 helps to preserve the stability of oxide TFTs, while its low-temperature processing ensures compatibility with temperature-sensitive materials such as those used in IJP OLEDs [24,25,26,27,28].
The primary objective of this study is to overcome the intrinsic low-speed limitation of ALD by employing the FCVA technique. We aim to (1) achieve a high deposition rate of dense Al2O3 films; (2) integrate them with IJP organic films to form a robust laminated TFE structure; and (3) validate the effectiveness of this novel encapsulation approach by assessing the stability of the encapsulated oxide TFT and the reliability of the encapsulated IJP OLED devices.

2. Experiment

2.1. Deposition of Al2O3 Film Using FCVA

In contrast to ALD, the FCVA process for depositing Al2O3 operates without the need for a hydrogen element. Under vacuum conditions, an intense arc discharge is initiated between the cathode and anode, generating extremely high-temperature cathode spots on the cathode surface. The movement of these arc spots is systematically controlled across the aluminum target using a scanning coil to ensure uniform consumption of the cathode material. The electrons, atoms, photons, and micron particles of cathode material are abundantly emitted from the arc spot. At high pressure and density, the electrons and atoms undergo intense collisions, forming a highly ionized, high-density plasma of the cathode material. Guided by the magnetic field, electrons transport the aluminum plasma through a bent duct to the substrate where it is reacted with oxygen, resulting in the formation of Al2O3. In contrast, uncharged particles like large droplets and neutral particles adhere to the inside walls of the magnetic filter duct, and these are removed [29,30].
The FCVA deposition system comprises components such as a vacuum chamber, a high-voltage pulse power supply, a magnetic-filtering curved duct, focusing coils, filtering coils, and a substrate holder. Through equipment modifications and process optimization, the deposition rate of the Al2O3 films can be adjusted within the range of 10 to 20 nm/min. The FCVA deposition process is schematically illustrated in Figure 1.
First, the PEN (DuPont, Wilmington, DE, USA) sheets and silicon wafers were ultrasonically cleaned sequentially in acetone, ethanol, and deionized water, followed by drying with nitrogen gas to eliminate surface particles that could compromise film density.
FCVA-Al2O3 films were deposited using an Al target as the cathode source. Prior to deposition, the vacuum chamber was evacuated to a base pressure of 4.0 × 10−3 Pa and heated to a working temperature of 80 °C. The cathode was then activated using an arc current of 95 A. During the deposition process, a gas mixture consisting of 6 sccm argon (Ar) and 16 sccm oxygen (O2) was continuously introduced into the chamber. The distance between the target and the substrate was fixed at 260 mm. Meanwhile, a negative bias was applied to the substrate, with a frequency of 50 Hz and a voltage of 5 kV. Under these conditions, the deposition rate of Al2O3 was approximately 15 nm/min, and all fabricated films exhibited a thickness of approximately 100 nm.
ALD-Al2O3 films were deposited on both PEN and silicon wafer at 85 °C, using trimethylaluminum (TMA) as the precursor and plasma O2 as the reactant. TMA was relatively stable and readily available, meaning that it could be adsorbed onto a variety of substrates of different materials. Compared with O3 and H2O, using the plasma O2 as the reactant can produce films with better barrier properties and reduce deposition time. The final 100 nm Al2O3 film was deposited in 720 cycles, resulting in a growth per cycle (GPC) of ~0.14 nm/cycle.
The resulting films were then characterized for their key properties, including surface roughness, residual stress, WVTR, and visible-light transmittance.

2.2. Deposition of Al2O3 Films on Oxide TFT Backplanes

The dies (10 mm × 20 mm) of the Test Element Group (TEG) were diced from the oxide TFT backplane and mounted onto a glass substrate (100 mm × 100 mm) using thermally stable tape. To assess the positional effects, one die was placed in the central region and another at the edge region of the substrate. During the deposition of the Al2O3 film via the FCVA process, the substrate was rotated at a constant speed to improve film thickness uniformity. The oxide TFT samples are illustrated in Figure 2.
The electrical characteristics of the oxide TFTs, such as threshold voltage (Vth), carrier mobility, and subthreshold swing (SS), were compared before and after the deposition of the Al2O3 films to analyze the influence of the FCVA process on the TFT’s performance. With this analysis, we aimed to determine whether the high-energy plasma directly damages the oxide TFTs during deposition and whether the absence of hydrogen in the reaction contributes to enhanced electrical stability.

2.3. Thin-Film Encapsulation of IJP OLED Devices

A multilayer thin-film encapsulation structure was fabricated on 50 mm × 50 mm inkjet-printed OLED devices (self-fabricated) to evaluate the practical effectiveness of Al2O3 films deposited using FCVA technology for OLED encapsulation applications.
A silicon oxynitride (SiOxNy) layer was deposited as the first inorganic barrier on the IJP OLED devices via plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). The samples were then transferred to an inkjet printing system, where an acrylic resin ink was deposited onto the SiOxNy film via inkjet printing. The ink used was a UV-curable polymer (SDI, Yongin, Republic of Korea) solution based on poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). The printed liquid film was allowed to level out through static settling. Subsequently, the film was exposed to 395 nm of ultraviolet (UV) light, initiating photo polymerization of the acrylic monomers via a photo initiator, which resulted in crosslinking and solidification into a solid film as the organic planarization layer. The thickness of the organic layer was 12 μm; the thickness variation was controlled within ±3.0%. This organic layer exhibits excellent conformality and flexibility, effectively encapsulating particles and filling voids while also serving to modulate the stress within the multilayer structure, thereby improving encapsulation reliability.
Finally, a third inorganic barrier layer of Al2O3 was deposited atop the organic buffer layer using FCVA technology, thereby completing the multilayer TFE structure (FCVA-Al2O3 (100 nm)/TFE IJP (12 µm)/SiOxNy (0.75 µm)). A schematic of the encapsulated IJP OLED device structure is presented in Figure 3.
The optoelectronic performance of the IJP OLED devices, including parameters such as current, voltage, luminance, and efficiency, was compared before and after TFE was applied to analyze the influence of the FCVA-Al2O3 film on device performance. Additionally, the reference sample was encapsulated with a different structure (TFE IJP (12 µm)/SiOxNy (0.75 µm)), without the FCVA-Al2O3 film. A comparative study was conducted to evaluate the operational lifetime and reliability between devices encapsulated using these two different methods under high-temperature and high-humidity conditions.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Al2O3 Films Prepared Using FCVA

In this study, a 100 nm thick Al2O3 film was deposited via FCVA. This process took approximately 6–7 min, corresponding to a deposition rate of 15 nm/min. For comparison, depositing another Al2O3 film of the same thickness via ALD required about 20 min, with a deposition rate of less than 5 nm/min. FCVA-Al2O3 was applied in IJP OLED TFE, of which the multilayer structure was confirmed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Apreo 2 SEM, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The layer thicknesses were as follows: the FCVA-Al2O3 film was approximately 100 nm; the TFE IJP film was 12 μm; and the SiOxNy film was 0.75 μm. Cross-sectional SEM images of the multilayer TFE structure are shown in Figure 4.
The surface morphology and roughness of the films were characterized via Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) over a scan area of 500 nm × 500 nm, using a Bruker Dimension Icon system (Bruker Corporation, Greater Boston, MA, USA) in tapping mode with a silicon cantilever. The Al2O3 film prepared using FCVA showed an average surface roughness (Ra) of 0.111 nm, while that deposited by ALD exhibited an Ra of 0.314 nm. Although both films displayed favorable surface morphology, the FCVA-deposited film demonstrated superior smoothness, as illustrated in Figure 5.
When fabricating Al2O3 films of identical thicknesses, the FCVA technique is able to achieve a deposition rate three times faster than ALD and yield a superior average surface roughness. This results in not only significantly reduced process time but also enhanced surface flatness.
The residual stress was measured using a stress measurement system (FSM-100, Frontier Semiconductor, Milpitas, CA, USA) with a 780 nm measuring laser. The curvature was measured before and after TFE on a 4-inch silicon wafer [31]. The results indicated that the residual stress of the Al2O3 film prepared using FCVA could be adjusted within a range of −140.4 MPa to −55.1 MPa. When combined with the IJP organic buffer layer, this film effectively modulates the overall stress distribution within the multilayer encapsulation structure. This stress engineering prevents issues such as cracking or peeling caused by stress mismatch, thereby significantly improving the encapsulation reliability and flexural endurance of the device.
The film thickness and refractive index were measured using an ellipsometer (SE-3, Raditech, Shanghai, China), and the optical transparence was measured with a UV/Vis spectrometer (LAMBDA 365, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) with a scan wavelength ranging from 400 to 700 nm. Both films exhibited comparable refractive indices and visible-light transmittance, resulting in almost no impact on the light extraction of the OLED devices. Furthermore, the refractive index can be tailored during fabrication to minimize the potential impact. A detailed performance comparison between Al2O3 films prepared using FCVA and ALD is summarized in Table 1.
The phase composition and structural nature of the Al2O3 films were analyzed using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD) measurement system (Empyrean, PANalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands). The XRD measurements were performed on films deposited on silicon wafers, scanning a 2θ range from 30° to 70° with a step size of 0.05°. The XRD patterns of both ALD-Al2O3 and FCVA-Al2O3 showed no distinct characteristic peaks, indicating that both films possess an amorphous structure, as shown in Figure 6. Compared with ZrO2, TiO2, and MgO, which were prone to crystallizing, non-crystallized Al2O3 did not contain any grain boundaries that tend to form a channel for water vapor or oxygen.
The WVTR was measured using a moisture measurement system (CELASIS, Moresco, Kobe, Japan) based on precise element inspection with a mass spectrometer. The measuring samples were prepared via depositing a thin film on the PEN substrate with a thickness of 125 μm. All samples in this study were measured in an environment of 40 °C and 90% relative humidity. The WVTR testing exhibited values of 1.2 × 10−4 g/m2/day for the Al2O3 film deposited using FCVA compared with 1.6 × 10−3 g/m2/day for its ALD-prepared counterpart. Both films exhibited barrier properties as good as those achieved using single-layer encapsulation; notably, the FCVA-fabricated Al2O3 film demonstrated a WVTR one order of magnitude lower, indicating significantly superior water vapor barrier performance. These results are summarized in Figure 7.
Although the Al2O3 film prepared using FCVA exhibited good water vapor barrier properties, its performance still fell short of the requirements of OLED applications by approximately an order of magnitude. Therefore, it must be combined with an inkjet-printed organic buffer layer to form a multilayer TFE structure, which is essential for achieving the necessary WVTR performance [32].

3.2. Stability of Oxide TFT Encapsulated with FCVA-Al2O3

To further verify the feasibility of applying Al2O3 thin films prepared using FCVA technology in TFE, the electrical properties of the same oxide TFT device were measured before and after TFE using the B1500A analyzer (Keysight Technologies, Santa Rosa, CA, USA). The transfer characteristics were measured with gate voltages (Vgs) of −15 V to 20 V at drain voltages (Vd) of 0.1 V and 10 V. The output characteristics were obtained by increasing Vd from 0 V to 30 V at Vgs of 0.1, 5.1, 10.1, 15.1, 20.1, 25.1, and 30.1 V. The transfer and output curves of the TFTs before and after encapsulation with FCVA-Al2O3 are shown in Figure 8.
As shown in Table 2, the electrical properties of the oxide TFT were consistent before and after encapsulation with FCVA-Al2O3. Specifically, the encapsulation resulted in a marginal shift in Vth (from 1.08 V to 1.10 V), a negligible change in mobility (from 14.02 to 14.31 cm2/V·s), and a slight improvement in SS (from 0.16 to 0.15 V/dec). These slight variations in TFT electrical characteristics were considered within the testing error range. It is well-established that hydrogen incorporation is a primary source of instability in oxide TFTs, typically leading to significant negative Vth shifts. The absence of such degradation strongly suggests that use of the FCVA-Al2O3 process does not introduce detrimental hydrogen-related species.
It is postulated that the inherent low-energy plasma in the FCVA-Al2O3 process causes a negligible impact on TFT electrical properties. In contrast to Al2O3 films prepared using ALD or SiNx films prepared using CVD, the FCVA process does not involve a hydrogen element [33,34]; the hydrogen element is one of the most common impurities in oxide TFTs, and it can reside in the channel as positive or negative ions, influencing the hole concentration and consequently affecting the TFT’s performance and electrical stability [35,36,37,38].

3.3. Reliability of IJP OLED Encapsulated with FCVA-Al2O3

In this study, IJP OLED devices (self-fabricated) were selected as samples to verify the encapsulation reliability of the Al2O3 film. The device dimensions were 50 mm × 50 mm, each containing five independent emission pixels, as shown in Figure 9. A tandem encapsulation structure was formed by applying an FCVA-prepared Al2O3 film combined with an IJP organic buffer layer (self-fabricated). The optoelectronic properties of the OLED devices were measured before and after encapsulation using an optoelectronic performance analyzer (FS-5500GA4, Fstar, Suzhou, China). The bias voltage was applied using a Keithley 2400 DC power supply (Keithley Instruments, Solon, OH, USA), with an increase from −1 V to 8 V at 0.2 V increments to collect current-voltage characteristics. Device luminance, color coordinates, and spectral data were measured with a CS2000 spectrometer (Konica Minolta, Tokyo, Japan).
The optoelectronic performances of the IJP OLED devices before and after encapsulation with the FCVA-Al2O3 film are presented in Figure 10. For the devices (A, B, C, D) with the same device structure and process flow, the current density–voltage (J-V), luminance–voltage (L-V), and electroluminescence (EL) spectrum curves showed excellent consistency before and after encapsulation. Although the current efficiency (CE-J) curves exhibited minor shifts post-encapsulation, the results collectively indicate that the FCVA Al2O3 film did not cause a performance degradation; rather, it contributed to a certain improvement in the light out-coupling efficiency.
The IJP OLED devices underwent reliability testing in a controlled-environment chamber (MHK-408QK, Terchy, Suzhou, China) under accelerated aging conditions (85 °C, 85% relative humidity). Electroluminescence from a fixed emission region was periodically recorded while maintaining a constant driving voltage across the device.
A shrinkage of the OLED emission area was observed after 150 h in the reference sample, and this increased to four dark spots after 230 h; the largest one almost spanned the entire emission area. Therefore, we speculate that the lifetime of the reference sample rapidly declined within 80 h, and the TFE completely failed. In contrast, the first dark spot was observed after 300 h in the sample encapsulated with the FCVA-Al2O3 layer. Relative to the reference, the test sample showed a 150 h delay in the initial appearance of dark spots and a two-fold increase in the overall lifetime. The results are summarized in Table 3. Dark spots indicating shrinkage of emission area are highlighted with red circles.
The reliability test results demonstrate that the application of the FCVA-Al2O3 film for OLED encapsulation could delay the shrinkage of the OLED pixel emission area, thereby effectively prolonging the device’s operational lifetime under adverse conditions.

4. Conclusions

Compared with ALD-Al2O3, FCVA-Al2O3 has a faster deposition rate and lower WVTR, which is a more promising barrier, and it can lead to substantial gains in throughput and efficiency. A critical consideration is its compatibility with oxide TFT and IJP OLED. Due to its hydrogen-free nature, the FCVA-Al2O3 process effectively prevents any degradation of the electrical stability in oxide TFTs.
The key optoelectronic performance of IJP OLED devices, encapsulated with the FCVA-Al2O3 film, remains highly consistent post-encapsulation, and the lifetime of these devices is nearly double that of devices not encapsulated with FCVA-Al2O3. Undoubtedly, applying FCVA to the TFE of IJP OLEDs is an effective strategy to enable the extension of device lifespan without compromising optoelectronic performance.
The application of FCVA-Al2O3 for IJP OLED TFE represents a novel application of FCVA technology in the display field and shows considerable promise. Nevertheless, several aspects of this study merit further investigation to deepen our understanding. These include a more detailed analysis of hydrogen content and film quality in FCVA-Al2O3 films, a comprehensive investigation of oxide TFT bias stress stability, and a systematic evaluation of the LT50 lifetime of the encapsulated OLED devices.
Furthermore, the industrial-scale deployment of FCVA technology, especially for large-area and flexible display manufacturing, requires a system redesign focusing on multisource configurations and linear scanning mechanisms to achieve the necessary deposition area and film uniformity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.G.; validation, L.W., D.F. and X.S.; formal analysis, Z.G. and S.L.; investigation, Z.G., L.C. and S.L.; resources, L.W., L.C. and D.F.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.G.; writing—review and editing, Z.G.; supervision, L.W., D.F. and X.S.; project administration, S.L. and Z.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported in part by the National Key R&D Program of China under Grant 2024YFF1504501; in part by Advanced Materials—National Science and Technology Major Project under Grant 2024ZD0604500; in part by the Key R&D Plan of Guangdong Province under Grant 2023B0909010004; and in part by the TCL Science and Technology Innovation Fund.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Zhuo Gao, Songju Li, Xianwen Sun and Dong Fu were employed by the company Guangdong Juhua Printed Display Technology Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lee, J.G.; Gao, Z.; Fu, D.; Yan, X. Flexible Printed OLED TV has Potential to Create a New Application Market. Inf. Disp. 2022, 38, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jang, H.J.; Lee, J.Y.; Baek, G.W.; Kwak, J.; Park, J.H. Progress in the development of the display performance of AR, VR, QLED and OLED devices in recent years. J. Inf. Disp. 2022, 23, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Park, J.H.; Jeong, D.Y.; Han, K.Y. A Study on Improving Color Uniformity of Flexible OLEDs through Pixel-Define Layer Optimization in Inkjet Printing. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2025, 7, 10114–10123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hidehiro, Y.; Shuhei, N.; Takashi, I.; Yukiya, U.; Futoshi, O. Mura-free G8.5 220ppi inkjet printing technology for OLED and QLED display panels. J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 2024, 32, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jeong, E.G.; Kwon, J.H.; Kang, K.S.; Jeong, S.Y.; Choi, K.C. A review of highly reliable flexible encapsulation technologies towards rollable and foldable OLEDs. J. Inf. Disp. 2020, 21, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kwon, B.H.; Joo, C.W.; Cho, H.; Kang, C.; Yang, J.H.; Shin, J.W.; Kim, G.H.; Choi, S.; Nam, S.; Kim, K.; et al. Organic/Inorganic Hybrid Thin-Film Encapsulation Using Inkjet Printing and PEALD for Industrial Large-Area Process Suitability and Flexible OLED Application. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 55391–55402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lee, S.; Han, J.H.; Lee, S.H.; Baek, G.H.; Park, J.S. Review of organic/inorganic thin film encapsulation by atomic layer deposition for a flexible OLED display. J. Miner. Met. Mater. Soc. 2019, 71, 197–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Granstrom, J.; Swensen, J.S.; Moon, J.S.; Rowell, G.; Yuen, J.; Heeger, A.J. Encapsulation of organic light-emitting devices using a perfluorinated polymer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 93, 193304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Meyer, J.; Görrn, P.; Bertram, F.; Hamwi, S.; Winkler, T.; Johannes, H.; Weimann, T.; Hinze, P.; Riedl, T.; Kowalsky, W. Al2O3/ZrO2 nanolaminates as ultrahigh gas-diffusion barriers-a strategy for reliable encapsulation of organic electronics. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 1845–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wei, Y.W.; Liu, Z.C.; Chen, S.L. Optical characteristics of TiO2/Al2 O3 thin films and their atomic layer depositions. Chin. Opt. 2011, 4, 188–195. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kim, H.K.; Kim, M.S.; Kang, J.W.; Kim, J.-J.; Yi, M.-S. High-quality thin-film passivation by catalyzer-enhanced chemical vapor deposition for organic light-emitting diodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90, 013502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Steven, M.G. Atomic layer deposition: An overview. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 111–131. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhang, B.; Wang, Z.; Wang, J.; Chen, X. Recent Achievements for Flexible Encapsulation Films Based on Atomic/Molecular Layer Deposition. Micromachines 2024, 15, 478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yang, Y.Q.; Duan, Y.; Chen, P. Deposition of Al2O3 Film Using Atomic Layer Deposition Method at Low Temperature as Encapsulation Layer for OLEDs. Chin. J. Lumin. 2014, 35, 70–75. [Google Scholar]
  15. Li, Y.; Xiong, Y.F.; Yang, H.Z.; Cao, K.; Chen, R. Thin film encapsulation for the organic light-emitting diodes display via atomic layer deposition. J. Mater. Res. 2020, 35, 681–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Willis, S.A.; McGuinness, E.K.; Li, Y.; Losego, M.D. Re-examination of the Aqueous Stability of Atomic Layer Deposited (ALD) Amorphous Alumina (Al2O3) Thin Films and the Use of a Postdeposition Air Plasma Anneal to Enhance Stability. Langmuir 2021, 37, 14509–14519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ylivaara, O.M.E.; Kilpi, L.; Liu, X.W.; Sintonen, S.; Ali, S.; Laitinen, M.; Julin, J.; Haimi, E.; Sajavaara, T.; Lipsanen, H.; et al. Aluminum oxide/titanium dioxide nanolaminates grown by atomic layer deposition: Growth and mechanical properties. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2017, 35, 01B105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shao, Y.; Ding, S.J. Effects of hydrogen impurities on performances and electrical reliabilities of indium-gallium-zinc oxide thin film transistors. Acta Phys. Sin. 2018, 67, 098502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, C.; Cheng, K.-C.; Chagarov, E.; Kanicki, J. Crystalline In–Ga–Zn–O Density of States and Energy Band Structure Calculation Using Density Function Theory. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 50, 091102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hwang, E.S.; Kim, J.S.; Jeon, S.M.; Lee, S.J.; Jang, Y.; Cho, D.-Y.; Hwang, C.S. In2Ga2ZnO7 oxide semiconductor-based charge trap device for NAND flash memory. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 155203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yuan, H.; Li, Q.; Yan, W.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, L.; Pan, P.; Luo, J.; Liao, B.; Ouyang, X. A novel and efficient technology of depositing Al2O3 film for OLEDs thin film encapsulation. Vacuum 2022, 196, 110741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mohapatra, S.; Oh, M.S. Evaluating the Tribological Properties and Residual Stress of TiCrN Thin Films Deposited by Cathodic-Arc Physical Vapor Deposition Technique. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 2466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, B.; Zhang, L.; Wu, S.; Peng, X.; Ouyang, X.; Liao, B.; Zhang, X. A Study on the Structure and Properties of NiCr-DLC Films Prepared by Filtered Cathodic Vacuum Arc Deposition. Coatings 2025, 15, 1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kim, E.; Han, Y.; Kim, W.; Choi, K.C.; Im, H.G.; Bae, B.S. Thin film encapsulation for organic light emitting diodes using a multi-barrier composed of MgO prepared by atomic layer deposition and hybrid materials. Org. Electron. 2013, 14, 1737–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Seo, S.W.; Jung, E.; Chae, H.; Cho, S.M. Optimization of Al2O3/ZrO2 nanolaminate structure for thin-film encapsulation of OLEDs. Org. Electron. 2012, 13, 2436–2441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, L.H.; Kim, K.; Park, S.; Jeong, Y.J.; Kim, H.; Chung, D.S.; Kim, S.H.; Park, C.E. Al2O3/TiO2 nanolaminate thin film encapsulation for organic thin film transistors via plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 6731–6738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Choi, D.W.; Kim, S.J.; Lee, J.H.; Chung, K.B.; Park, J.S. A study of thin film encapsulation on polymer substrate using low temperature hybrid ZnO/Al2O3 layers atomic layer deposition. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2012, 12, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Martin, P.; Bendavid, A. Review of the filtered vacuum arc process and materials deposition. Thin Solid Film. 2001, 1, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yuan, H.; Zhang, Y.F.; Yan, W.Q.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Li, Q.; Chen, L.; Yin, Z.Y.; Liao, B.; Ouyang, X.P.; Ouyang, X. Flexible alumina films prepared using high-bias pulse power for OLED thin film encapsulation. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 36521–36530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yuan, H.; Zhang, Y.F.; Li, Q.; Yan, W.Q.; Zhang, X.; Ouyang, X.; Ouyang, X.P.; Chen, L.; Liao, B. A Study of Al2O3/MgO Composite Films Deposited by FCVA for Thin-Film Encapsulation. Materials 2023, 16, 1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, S.; Li, M.; Lan, L.; Fu, D.; Sun, X.; Gao, Z. Comprehensive Investigation on the Stability of Silicon Nitride/Oxynitride as Thin-Film Encapsulation Layers Prepared by Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2025, 17, 10832–10844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gao, S.Y.; Kong, X.-Z.; Zhang, F.-H.; Lv, L. Research Progress of Thin Film Encapsulation of Organic Light-Emitting Devices. J. Liq. Cryst. Disp. 2012, 27, 198–202. [Google Scholar]
  33. Jang, J.T.; Ko, D.; Choi, S.J.; Kim, D.M.; Kim, D.H. Observation of Hydrogen-Related Defect in Subgap Density of States and Its Effects Under Positive Bias Stress in Amorphous InGaZnO TFT. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2021, 42, 708–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ahn, I.S.; Ju, B.K.; Choi, S.-H. Effects of Hydrogen Doping on a-GIZO Thin-Film Transistors with Hafnium Dioxide Gate Insulators Formed by Atomic Layer Deposition at Different Temperatures. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2024, 71, 1920–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nakashima, M. Origin of major donor states in In–Ga–Zn oxide. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 116, 213703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, Y.; Liu, Z.; Jiang, K.; Hu, X. H2 annealing effect on the structural and electrical properties of amorphous InGaZnO films for thin film transistors. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2013, 378, 50–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sallis, S.; Butler, K.T.; Quackenbush, N.F.; Williams, D.S.; Junda, M.; Fischer, D.A.; Woicik, J.C.; Podraza, N.J.; White, B.E.; Walsh, A.; et al. Origin of deep subgap states in amorphous indium gallium zinc oxide: Chemically disordered coordination of oxygens. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104, 232108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kim, J.Y.; Kim, H.; Kim, D.; Jang, H.W. Advancements of Amorphous IGZO-Based Transistors: Materials, Processing, and Devices. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2025, 7, 4703–4728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 19 00638 g001
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of magnetic filter cathode vacuum arc deposition.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of magnetic filter cathode vacuum arc deposition.
Materials 19 00638 g001
Materials 19 00638 g002
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the TFT test structure.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the TFT test structure.
Materials 19 00638 g002
Materials 19 00638 g003
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of IJP OLED stack structure encapsulation.
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of IJP OLED stack structure encapsulation.
Materials 19 00638 g003
Materials 19 00638 g004
Figure 4. The cross-sectional SEM images of the multilayer TFE structure.
Figure 4. The cross-sectional SEM images of the multilayer TFE structure.
Materials 19 00638 g004
Materials 19 00638 g005
Figure 5. The surface roughness of Al2O3 films prepared using FCVA (a) and ALD (b).
Figure 5. The surface roughness of Al2O3 films prepared using FCVA (a) and ALD (b).
Materials 19 00638 g005
Materials 19 00638 g006
Figure 6. The XRD pattern of ALD-Al2O3 (a) and FCVA-Al2O3 (b).
Figure 6. The XRD pattern of ALD-Al2O3 (a) and FCVA-Al2O3 (b).
Materials 19 00638 g006
Materials 19 00638 g007
Figure 7. The chart of WVTR of Al2O3 films prepared using FCVA (a) and ALD (b).
Figure 7. The chart of WVTR of Al2O3 films prepared using FCVA (a) and ALD (b).
Materials 19 00638 g007
Materials 19 00638 g008
Figure 8. The transfer curves (a) and the output curves (b) of the same TFT before and after encapsulation with FCVA-Al2O3.
Figure 8. The transfer curves (a) and the output curves (b) of the same TFT before and after encapsulation with FCVA-Al2O3.
Materials 19 00638 g008
Materials 19 00638 g009
Figure 9. The diagram of IJP OLED device (a) and lighting test (b).
Figure 9. The diagram of IJP OLED device (a) and lighting test (b).
Materials 19 00638 g009
Materials 19 00638 g010
Figure 10. The IJP OLED performance comparison before and after encapsulation using FCVA: J-V curve (a), L-V curve (b), CE-J curve (c), and EL spectrum curve (d). A/B/C/D represent the OLED performance before encapsulation, and A-1/B-1/C-1/D-1 represent the OLED performance after encapsulation.
Figure 10. The IJP OLED performance comparison before and after encapsulation using FCVA: J-V curve (a), L-V curve (b), CE-J curve (c), and EL spectrum curve (d). A/B/C/D represent the OLED performance before encapsulation, and A-1/B-1/C-1/D-1 represent the OLED performance after encapsulation.
Materials 19 00638 g010
Table 1. Comparison of properties of Al2O3 films prepared using FCVA and ALD.
Table 1. Comparison of properties of Al2O3 films prepared using FCVA and ALD.
PropertiesFCVA-Al2O3ALD-Al2O3
Film Thickness (nm)106.1106.5
Average Roughness (nm)0.1110.314
Residual Stress (MPa)−7070
Refractive Index1.6841.632
Visible-Light Transmittance (%)98.498
Water Vapor Transmission Rate (g/m2/day)1.2 × 10−41.6 × 10−3
Table 2. Influence of FCVA technology on the electrical properties of oxide TFT.
Table 2. Influence of FCVA technology on the electrical properties of oxide TFT.
ItemsTFT PropertiesBefore EncapsulationAfter Encapsulation
Encapsulated with CVD-SiNxVth (V)0.530.54
Mobility (cm2/Vs)11.4215.92
SS (V/dec)0.100.15
Encapsulated with FCVA-Al2O3Vth (V)1.081.10
Mobility (cm2/Vs)14.0214.31
SS (V/dec)0.160.15
Table 3. Reliability test of IJP OLED encapsulated with FCVA-Al2O3.
Table 3. Reliability test of IJP OLED encapsulated with FCVA-Al2O3.
TFE StructureRA 0 hRA 24 hRA 150 hRA 230 hRA 300 h
Materials 19 00638 i001Materials 19 00638 i002Materials 19 00638 i003Materials 19 00638 i004Materials 19 00638 i005NA
Materials 19 00638 i006Materials 19 00638 i007Materials 19 00638 i008Materials 19 00638 i009Materials 19 00638 i010Materials 19 00638 i011
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gao, Z.; Li, S.; Wang, L.; Chen, L.; Sun, X.; Fu, D. Filtered Cathodic Vacuum Arc Deposition for Inkjet-Printed OLED Encapsulation. Materials 2026, 19, 638. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19030638

AMA Style

Gao Z, Li S, Wang L, Chen L, Sun X, Fu D. Filtered Cathodic Vacuum Arc Deposition for Inkjet-Printed OLED Encapsulation. Materials. 2026; 19(3):638. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19030638

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gao, Zhuo, Songju Li, Lei Wang, Lin Chen, Xianwen Sun, and Dong Fu. 2026. "Filtered Cathodic Vacuum Arc Deposition for Inkjet-Printed OLED Encapsulation" Materials 19, no. 3: 638. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19030638

APA Style

Gao, Z., Li, S., Wang, L., Chen, L., Sun, X., & Fu, D. (2026). Filtered Cathodic Vacuum Arc Deposition for Inkjet-Printed OLED Encapsulation. Materials, 19(3), 638. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19030638

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop