Next Article in Journal
Simple Method for Apples’ Bruise Area Prediction
Next Article in Special Issue
A Review of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Technique to Analyze the Stability and Degradation Mechanism of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Cathode Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Nitriding and Denitriding of Nanocrystalline Iron System with Bimodal Crystallite Size Distribution
Previous Article in Special Issue
Materials AIILnInO4 with Ruddlesden-Popper Structure for Electrochemical Applications: Relationship between Ion (Oxygen-Ion, Proton) Conductivity, Water Uptake, and Structural Changes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Layered Oxygen-Deficient Double Perovskites as Promising Cathode Materials for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

by
Andrei I. Klyndyuk
1,*,
Ekaterina A. Chizhova
1,
Dzmitry S. Kharytonau
2 and
Dmitry A. Medvedev
3,4
1
Department of Physical, Colloid and Analytical Chemistry, Organic Substances Technology Faculty, Belarusian State Technological University, Sverdlova 13a, 220006 Minsk, Belarus
2
Jerzy Haber Institute of Catalysis and Surface Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Niezapominajek 8, 30-239 Krakow, Poland
3
Laboratory of Electrochemical Devices Based on Solid Oxide Proton Electrolytes, Institute of High Temperature Electrochemistry, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 620660 Ekaterinburg, Russia
4
Hydrogen Energy Laboratory, Ural Federal University, 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(1), 141; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010141
Submission received: 28 November 2021 / Revised: 18 December 2021 / Accepted: 22 December 2021 / Published: 25 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Functional Materials for Solid Oxide Electrochemical Cells)

Abstract

:
Development of new functional materials with improved characteristics for solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) and solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs) is one of the most important tasks of modern materials science. High electrocatalytic activity in oxygen reduction reactions (ORR), chemical and thermomechanical compatibility with solid electrolytes, as well as stability at elevated temperatures are the most important requirements for cathode materials utilized in SOFCs. Layered oxygen-deficient double perovskites possess the complex of the above-mentioned properties, being one of the most promising cathode materials operating at intermediate temperatures. The present review summarizes the data available in the literature concerning crystal structure, thermal, electrotransport-related, and other functional properties (including electrochemical performance in ORR) of these materials. The main emphasis is placed on the state-of-art approaches to improving the functional characteristics of these complex oxides.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Fuel cells (FCs) are electrochemical devices in which the chemical energies of different fuels (including fossil fuels) can be directly and effectively converted into electrical energy in one stage [1,2]. In FCs the restrictions of the Carnot cycle are absent; therefore, the thermodynamic efficiency of these devices may reach 90% and higher [3] depending on their composition, interval of working temperatures, etc. These devices are categorized into different groups which consider geometrical design [1], fuel (hydrogen, biomass, hydrocarbons, alcohols, etc.) [2], used electrolyte (proton-conducting membranes, oxygen- and proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs), etc.) [3], and operating temperature range (low-temperature, intermediate-temperature, and high-temperature FCs), etc. Taking into account peculiarities of the SOFC’s design, they can be divided into typical asymmetrical (A–SOFCs, in which the cathode and the anode are made of different materials) and symmetrical (S–SOFCs, in which the cathode and the anode materials are the same) derivatives [4]. Typically, SOFCs are divided into three groups according to their operation temperatures (and the solid electrolyte used in them): high-temperature SOFCs (HT–SOFCs, 1073–1273 K, and ZrO2- or CeO2-based solid electrolytes), intermediate–temperature SOFCs (IT–SOFCs, 873–1073 K, and LaGaO3-based solid electrolytes), and low–temperature SOFCs (LT–SOFCs, < 873 K, and δ-Bi2O3 or Bi4V2O11-based solid electrolytes) [5,6,7,8,9,10]. Usually, oxygen-ion-conducting solid electrolytes are widely used in SOFCs (such as the above mentioned electrolytes and others [5,6,7,8,9,10]), but recently increasing attention has been paid to proton-conducting BaCeO3- and BaZrO3-based solid electrolytes [2,8,10,11], which exhibit some advantages over oxygen-ionic electrolytes, especially at intermediate and low temperatures.
Despite essential progress, which recently has been achieved in the development of individual SOFCs materials (electrolytes, anodes, cathodes, collectors, and sealants) [3,6,7,8,9,10,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] and the production and testing of SOFCs [1,2,7,21,22,23], some urgent challenges still exist. One of the most important of these challenges is the search for, development of, and study of new electrode materials, which possess high stability, thermal and chemical compatibility, and improved electrochemical performance towards cathode and electrode reactions occurring in SOFCs. Regarding anodes (fuel electrodes), this problem was partially solved by the development of a new class of anode materials based on double perovskite molybdates SrMMoO6 (M = Ni, Mg, and Fe) and their derivatives, including cermets [4,24,25]. Discussing the cathodes (oxygen or air electrodes), one of the most interesting and promising materials for IT–SOFCs are the layered oxygen-deficient double perovskites, LnBaM2O6–δ (Ln—rare-earth element; M—3d-metal), which have been intensively studied with this aim for last two decades [4,8,9,10]. Due to the high tolerance of perovskite structure, these complex oxides can be formed at different combinations of their constituents, demonstrating outstanding thermal, electrotransport-related, magnetic, electrochemical, and other properties. As a result, these double perovskites can be used as working elements of chemical gas sensors, high-temperature thermoelectrics, cathode materials of IT–SOFCs, etc. [26].
The present article provides an overview of peculiarities of the crystal structure, physicochemical properties, and electrochemical performance of layered oxygen-deficient perovskites as cathode materials of SOFCs, as well as ways and methods of improving the functional characteristics of these materials.

2. Cathode Materials for IT–SOFCs: Past, Present, and Future

An ideal cathode material for a SOFC must possess [27,28,29,30,31,32,33]: (a) high electronic (n- or p-type) conductivity (in an oxidizing atmosphere, preferably, more than 102 S cm−1); (b) thermal and chemical compatibility with solid electrolytes and interconnectors; (c) enough large porosity to provide fast diffusion of gaseous oxygen through a cathode to a triple-phase cathode–solid electrolyte–gas phase interface; (d) high stability in an oxidizing atmosphere; (e) high catalytic activity in an oxygen reduction reaction (ORR); and (f) low cost.
Typical cathode materials utilized in SOFCs are perovskites (ABO3) of light rare-earth elements (REE), 3d-metals (usually, Mn, Fe, Co, and Ni), and their solid solutions and composites [4,6,7,8,9,10,27,34,35,36,37,38,39]. Among all cathode materials, Co-based perovskites and their derivatives received enormous research interest and played an integral role in the development and commercialization of IT–SOFCs [14,21,26,39]. Figure 1 shows the crystal structures of perovskites and other complex oxides possessing mixed ionic–electronic conductivity (MIEC), which have been used as cathode materials for SOFCs operating in different temperature intervals. A common strategy for tuning their functional properties is the partial heterovalent substitution of A- or/and B-site cations in their structure, mostly to enhance electrical conductivity and to lower the value of the thermal expansion coefficient (TEC). To decrease the electrode polarization losses at reduced operating temperatures, the addition of noble metals (Pd, Ag, and Pt) to the cathode material is used as well [27]. To increase the compatibility of these compounds with the solid electrolyte, they are often used in the form of composites.
During the investigation of ABO3 perovskite solid solutions, a new class of oxide materials (named layered oxygen-deficient double perovskites (LODPs)), LnBa(M’,M”)2O6–δ (Ln is REE; M’, M” are 3d-metals) (cation-ordered phases), was purposefully designed. Their electrochemical performance is reported to be better than that of the parent perovskites. Therefore, these phases are currently considered as being very promising cathode materials, especially for IT–SOFCs [4,6,8,9,10,34,35,40,41] and have been intensively studied both as single materials and SOFCs components [42].
Another group of cathode materials includes complex oxides with so-called Ruddlesden–Popper (RP) phases (layered oxides) with a general formula of An+1BnO3n+1. These compounds, for example, Ln2NiO4+δ (Ln = La, Pr, Nd), and their solid solutions possess high diffusivity of interstitial oxygen ions, comparatively low TEC values, and high enough electrical conductivity, which also makes them promising for SOFCs applications [6,8,10,27,40]. Other RP phases, such as (Sr,La)3(Fe,Co)2O7–x (n = 2) and (La,Sr)4(Fe,Co)3O10−x (n = 3) showed good electrocatalytic activity in ORR in single cell measurements [6].
Recently, it has been shown that effective cathodes for proton-conducting SOFCs operating at low and intermediate temperatures are Ba(Ce,Zr)O3-based solid solutions doped with transition elements in high concentration. These phases demonstrate excellent chemical compatibility with typical proton-conducting solid electrolytes due to the similarity of their compositions [43,44]. These compounds belong to the triple-conducting oxides (TCOs) [45,46,47], in which transport species are simultaneously protons, oxygen ions, and electrons (holes). The advantage of TCOs as cathode materials for proton-conducting SOFCs is that both protons from the solid electrolyte and oxygen species adsorbed from the air may migrate through the bulk and over the surface of the cathode, which extends the reaction area over the whole electrode. We should note that LODPs, such as LnBa0.5Sr0.5Co1.5Fe0.5O5+δ (Ln = Pr, Nd), when used as cathodes for proton-conducting SOFCs, also belong to the class of TCOs [9,44]. According to [48], triple conductivity in LODPs can appear due to the formation of impurity phases, which should be taken into account for the development of new TCOs.
Very interesting and promising materials for use in SOFCs are high-entropy ceramics (HECs, Figure 2), which are solid solutions of inorganic compounds (including metal oxides) with one or more Wyckoff site shared by equal or near-equal atomic ratios of five (or occasionally four) constituting elements [49,50]. The so-called compositionally complex ceramics (CCCs) include, besides HECs, medium-entropy and/or non-equimolar compositions [51]. It has been shown recently that medium- and high-entropy perovskite oxides, such as Sr(FeαTiβCoγMnζ)O3–δ [52], (La,Sr)(Co,Cr,Fe,Mn,Ni)O3–δ [53,54], and (La,Pr,Nd,Sm,Ba,Sr)(Co,Fe,Ni,Cu)O3–δ [55] demonstrate lower TECs with a lack of visible contribution from the chemical expansion effect and a more stable and much lower polarization resistance compared with the conventional cathode materials. These peculiarities make such materials very attractive for electrochemical applications.

3. Crystal Structure, Phase Transitions, and Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Layered Oxygen-Deficient Double Perovskites

The crystal structure of LnBa(M’,M”)2O6–δ LODPs, consisting of alternating (–BaO–), (–(M’,M”)O2–) and LnO1–δ layers, is formed due to the ordering of oxygen vacancies, Ln, and Ba atoms in the structure of oxygen deficient LnM’(M”)O3–δ perovskites according to Equation (1):
2Ln0.5Ba0.5CoO3–δ (Pm3m) LnBaCo2O6–δ (P4/mmm or Pmmm)
A structural phase transition occurs at such an arrangement: cubic perovskite structure (Pm3m) transforms into a tetragonal (P4/mmm) or an orthorhombic (Pmmm) structure (Figure 3). A different character of oxygen-vacancy ordering, as well as the ordering of M’ and M” ions, may result in the fact that LODPs crystallize in other space groups (SGs), such as P1, P2, or Ammm [26]; nevertheless, P4/mmm or Pmmm are the most typical ones.
This transition usually occurs at high temperatures and low oxygen partial pressures and may proceed through the formation of an intermediate product with a complex domain structure, which has a strong affinity with oxygen and may exchange it with an atmosphere at relatively low temperatures (ca. 340 K) [57].
Oxygen content variation in LODPs results in a change in their structure, which takes place at different temperatures depending on the cationic composition and oxygen partial pressure. For example, GdBaCo2–xFexO6–δ (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.4) perovskites undergo a PmmmP4/mmm phase transition at approximately 730–760 K [58]. Layered cobaltites of REE and barium undergo the dielectric-metal transition, in which their electrical conductivity increases by several orders of magnitude. This is caused by a change in the spin state of the cobalt ions [26,59]. At high temperatures, these phases are paramagnetic, but at cooling LODPs become antiferro-, ferri-, or ferromagnetic [26,60,61,62] due to a different type of ordering of magnetic moments of the transition metal ions in their structure.
Electrical conductivity values of LODPs vary widely depending on their cationic composition and oxygen nonstoichiometry [26,58,60,62,63,64,65,66,67]. For compounds which contain light REEs and possess small oxygen deficiencies, electrical conductivity is approximately 103 S cm−1 (such phases are metal-like conductors). On the contrary, for compounds composed of heavy REE and possessing large oxygen deficiency, conductivity is approximately 10−8 S cm−1, which is typical for dielectrics.
Large values of both the Seebeck coefficient and the electrical conductivity of several layered cobaltites [58,68], ferrocobaltites [62,69], ferrocuprates [69,70,71,72], and other LODPs [73] make them promising candidates for use in high-temperature thermoelectrogenerators (TEGs) for effective conversion of heat into electrical energy.
Double perovskites LnBaCo2O5+δ (Ln = Eu, Gd, and Sm) containing weakly-bonded oxygen (δ) and cobalt ions in different oxidation states (Co2+, Co3+, Co4+) demonstrate certain photocatalytic activity during the degradation of Congo Red, which indicates that they may be promising photocatalysts for the oxidation (degradation) of organic substances [74].
To be used in high-temperature devices, such as SOFCs, solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs), TEGs, and other applied directions, LODPs must possess a good thermomechanical and chemical compatibility with other components of these devices [75]. The first condition of thermomechanical compatibility is the similarity of their TEC values with those of the typical solid electrolytes used in SOFCs. The TEC values for some typical LODPs are set out in Table 1. As can be seen, for the layered perovskites with only Co atoms in B-site, the TEC values vary within ca. (17−24) × 10−6 K−1; the measured TECs are much higher than those of the commonly used ZrO2-, CeO2-, and LaGaO3-based solid electrolytes (as a rule, between (10−13) × 10−6K−1) [5].
The TEC values of layered oxygen-deficient double cobaltites decline when the REEs’ ionic radii decrease, as well as when a partial substitution of cobalt with iron (at small doping levels) or copper occurs (Table 1). Both of these strategies are effective in improving the thermomechanical properties of LODPs. Molecular dynamics simulations have shown [76], that variations in the cationic composition or/and oxygen nonstoichiometry of layered oxygen-deficient double cobaltites is the other effective way to reduce the TEC values of these materials.
The TEC values of LODPs sharply increase at high temperatures (above ca. 500–700 K) due to the beginning of the evolution of weakly-bonded oxygen from their crystal structures into the environment. Therefore, the expansion of these phases at high temperatures is determined by both thermal and chemical factors [26,58,62,75].
The chemical expansion coefficient (CEC) values of some LODPs are provided in Table 2. As can be seen, these values vary within 0.5–2.6%, exhibiting a strong anisotropy; simultaneous chemical expansion along the a-axis (in the ab-plane) and chemical contraction along the c-axis (out-of-plane) take place during the evolution of weakly-bonded oxygen. According to [58,77], the former occurs due to an increase inthe average radii of cobalt ions due to their reduction, but the latter occurs due to the change in the coordination environment of REE and cobalt ions.
A serious drawback of layered cobaltites is their degradation in CO2-containing atmospheres. For example, Zhu et al. [81] have studied the degradation features of PrBaCo2O5+δin CO2-containing atmospheres. They found a considerable decrease in the electrochemical activity of PrBaCo2O5+δ electrodes due to the formation of insulating BaCO3 particles at the PrBaCo2O5+δ surface.
On the other side, efficient cathodes of SOFCs should provide a large oxygen exchange rate between the atmosphere and the surface of the cathode and enough high oxygen mobility. Therefore, both bulk and surface chemistry in the oxygen exchange kinetics of MIEC layered perovskites are very important. It was found [82] that the surfaces of PrBaCo2O5+δ and GdBaCo2O5+δ LODPs can significantly change in their local chemical composition and can exchange by oxygen with the atmosphere even at ambient temperature.
Perry and Ishihara [83] summarized the main directions of improving the efficiency and durability of oxygen electrodes (including those based on LODPs) in SOFCs. Concerning the bulk chemistry, the areas of “electro-chemo-mechanics” are (1) the enhancement in transport and surface reactivity through the strain-state tailoring (mechano-electrical and mechano-electrochemical coupling) and (2) the mitigation of deleterious chemical expansion during operation, induced by stoichiometry changes (chemo-mechanical coupling). Regarding the surface chemistry and oxygen surface exchange kinetics, the main areas of interest are (1) clarifying the rate-limiting steps and mechanisms of oxygen incorporation/excorporation with atomistic insight; (2) exploiting the unique properties of hetero-interfaces, grain boundaries, and other large surface defects; (3) identifying the optimal composition for the outermost atomic monolayers; and (4) studying how to control the outermost chemistry in operating conditions via bulk and surface chemical tailoring.
Oxygen mobility in materials used in SOFCs and catalytic membranes was comparatively discussed in detail in [84]. The results of the investigation of chemical compatibility between different oxide electrodes and solid electrolytes in SOFCs are provided in [85]. Concerning LODPs, cathode materials such as LnBaCo2O5+δ (Ln = Pr and Gd) possess poor chemical compatibility with (Ce,Sm)O2–δ (SDC) and(Ce,Gd)O2–δ (GDC) above 1173 K and are prone to chemical reactions with the formations of BaCeO3, BaCoO3, and Sm2CuO4. The composite material of the LODP cathode with (La,Sr)(Cr,Mn)O3 (LSCM) is stable below 1273 K without any obvious secondary phase formation. However, chemical interactions in this material may occur above 1473 K. Chemical reactions between the LODP cathode and Ba(Zr,Y)O3–δ (BZY) or Ba(Zr,Y,Yb)O3–δ (BZYYb) proton conductors were not observed. However, GdBaCo2O5+δ reacts with YSZ at 973 K with the formation of BaZrO3. Doping with Fe, Cu, and Nb at the B-site of RBaCo2O5+δ (R = Pr and Y) can effectively improve chemical compatibility between the LODP cathodes and SDC or GDC solid electrolytes.
Figure 4 shows the XRD results for YBaCoCuO5+δ (YBCC) and YBaCo2/3Fe2/3Cu2/3O5+δ (YBCFC), which were calcined at 1223 K for 10 h in air mixtures with different solid electrolytes (SDC, GDC, and LSCM). No impurities or shifts of diffraction peaks were observed for compositions containing YBCC (Figure 4a), indicating that this compound is chemically compatible with the studied electrolytes. On the contrary, small amounts of Sm2CuO4 and Gd2CuO4 impurity phases in the YBCFC–SDC and YBCFC–GDC mixtures were observed (Figure 4b), showing that the YBCFC material is incompatible with SDC and GDC electrolytes. However, the absence of impurity phases in the YBCFC–LSCM mixture indicates that YBCFC presents good chemical compatibility with LSCM solid electrolytes below 1223 K.
Tsvetkov et al. [87] found that PrBaCo2O5+δ and SDC experienced the interdiffusion of Pr and Sm at 1273 K; the formation of BaCeO3 had high electrical resistivity. Diffusion of praseodymium into the electrolyte resulted in an increase in its electronic conductivity, which led to adecrease in the open-circuit voltage and even the short circuit of the cell [88]. The formation of the BaCeO3 phase also increased the ohmic and polarization resistance of the components of the electrochemical cell.
The NdBaFe1.9Mn0.1O5+δ cathode material showed good chemical compatibility with the BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.2O3–δ (BZCY) electrolyte at a temperature of 1173 K [89]. In [90], it was shown that Sr2(Co,Nb)FeO5+δ double perovskites do not react with La0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3 (LSGM) at 1273 K in air, indicating the good chemical compatibility of these compounds.

4. Electrochemical Performance of Layered Oxygen-Deficient Perovskites

4.1. Layered Cobaltites of REEs and Barium

The main advantages of layered oxygen-deficient cobaltites as cathodes for SOFCs are their superior electronic and ionic conductivity, as well as their higher electrocatalytic activity towards the ORR, especially in the IT-temperature range [8,9,10,34,35,40]. Table 3 summarizes the electrochemical performance of REE–barium layered cobaltites.
According to this table, layered cobaltites exhibit good electrochemical activity with the lowest ASR value of 0.0086 Ω cm2 at 1073 K reached for the LaBaCo2O5+δ cathode. This is much lower than values taken for commonly used LODPs. The ASR value for the NdBaCo2O5+δ cathode is 0.08 Ω cm2 at 973 K, under a cathodic applied voltage of −0.1 V [96]. The activation energy of the interface conductivity of these materials varied within ~110 kJ mol–1 and 160 kJ mol–1, decreasing with an increase in the applied voltage (E), since the diffusion process was more easily affected by the increase in E than the charge transfer process.
The highest power density values were obtained for PrBaCo2O5+δ, which reached 866 mW cm−2 at 923 K for the cell (−)NiO|Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9|PrBaCo2O5+δ(+) and 361 mWcm−2 at 973 K for the cell (−)NiO+BaCe0.5Zr0.3Y0.16Zn0.04O3–δ|BaCe0.5Zr0.3Y0.16Zn0.04O3–δ|PrBaCo2O5+δ(+) (Figure 5). It is interesting to note that the electrochemical performance of this material in SOFCs containing oxygen-ion conducting solid electrolytes is essentially higher than that in SOFCs with the proton-conducting electrolyte.
As a whole, the overall electrochemical performance of the ordered oxygen-deficient double perovskites is reported to be higher than for A-site disordered phases. However, the performance of LnBaCo2O5+δ cathodes usually deteriorates with decreases in the Ln3+ ionic radius, partly due to a decrease in oxygen content [94,99,100,101]. The reported ASR values for the La0.5Ba0.5CoO3–δ and LaBaCo2O5+δ cathodes at 873 K were equal to 11.5 and 7.4 Ω cm2, respectively, with activation energy values of 0.90 and 0.97 eV, respectively [102].
The electrocatalytic activity and stability of LnBaCo2O5+δ (Ln = La, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, and Gd) perovskites in the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) were studied in [103]. It was found, from the DFT calculations, that LnBaCo2O5+δ phases exhibit an optimal free energy combination for the H2O adsorption/dissociation and –OH/H* desorption, which open up the opportunity for the development of new perovskite-based energy materials.

4.2. A-Site-Deficient and A-Site-Substituted LnBaCo2O5+δ Layered Perovskites

An effective way to improve functional properties of the discussed layered perovskites is through the creation of a cation deficiency in their A-sublattice (both in REE and barium positions) and partial isovalent substitution of barium with smaller alkaline-earth elements (AEEs), such as strontium or calcium. Table 4 summarizes some results obtained for SOFCs based on such double perovskites.
Single-phase materials are formed at a relatively small deficiency of REE (8 mol.% for Pr [104], 5–10 mol.% for Sm [105,106]). The formation of REE-vacancies in the Ln1−xBaCo2O5+δ phases leads to an increase in their lattice constants and decreases their oxygen content. This results in a decrease of their electrical conductivity, and improvement of their electrochemical performance (particularly, to the essential lowering of ASR and increasing of PD [105,106,107]), at least at a low REE deficiency level (approximately5 mol.%).
The crystal structure of LnBa1–xCo2O5+δ is retained at x ≤ 0.15, 0.08–0.10 and 0.05 for Ln = La [108], Pr [109,110], and Nd [111], respectively. The formation of a barium deficiency slightly affects the lattice constants of LODPs [111] but results in a decrease in the oxygen content [111], their TECs [109,110], and electrical conductivity [108,109,110,111].
A paramount electrochemical performance of 1.03 W cm−2 at 973 K was observed in the anode-supported NiO–Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95|Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95|PrBa0.94Co2O5+δ SOFC [110]. Improvement of functional properties was also observed for Ba-deficient solid solutions, such as Pr0.5Ba0.25–xCa0.25CoO3–δ [112] and PrBa0.5–xSr0.5Co2O5+δ [113].
The addition of potassium results in a higher cation deficiency in the PrBa1−xCo2O5+δ perovskites, improving bulk oxygen transport [114]. However, the cobalt content at the surface of these samples was found to have decreased as well, causing the deterioration of their electrochemical performance towards the surface oxygen exchange.
Inter-substitution of praseodymium by barium in Pr1+xBa1−xCo2O6–δ leads to the formation of double-phase composites comprising orthorhombic PrBaCo2O6–δ (SG Pmmm) and PrCoO3 (SG Pnma) for x = 0.2 and 0.8 [115]. The triple-phase boundary reaction suggests the formation of Co(OH)3 along with the H2 gas evolution during the electrochemical dissolution of these composite electrodes with H2O inreaction (2).
Pr1+xBa1−xCo2O6–δ + 3H2O Pr1+xBa1−xCo2−yO6–δ + yCo(OH)3 + {(6 − 3y)/2}H2↑ + (3 − 3y− δ)/2}O2
The sample with x = 0.6 showed a higher ORR rate with more intense H2 gas evolution compared with the others.
Lu et al. [116], using the conventional solid-state reactions method, synthesized an A-site deficient double perovskite PrBa0.94Co2O5+δ (A–PBC) and then created nanorods of simple perovskite (PrCoO3) on the surface of its particles via an in situ exsolution process, which resulted in the formation of a heterostructured simple perovskite nanorod-decorated double perovskite cathode (SPN–A–PBC). High electrocatalytic activity of the SPN-A-PBC cathode toward ORR was found, achieving apolarization resistance of about 0.025 Ω cm2 at 973 K in air. The anode-supported single cell with the SPN–A–PBC cathode reached a power density of 1.1 W cm−2 at 973 K and a superior steady operation over 120 h at a loading voltage of 0.6 V (Figure 6). This electrode also exhibited a good tolerance to CO2; when tested in air with 6 vol.% CO2 at 973K, it maintained a stable polarization resistance of about 0.078 Ω cm2.
A partial substitution of barium with smaller strontium or/and calcium in LnBaCo2O5+δ leads to the expected decrease of lattice constants and TEC values [117,118,119,120,124] and an increase in the electrical conductivity [118,123,124] and the electrochemical performance of the corresponding materials [117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124].
In [118], a co-doping strategy of both Pr and Ba by Ca in layered PrBaCo2O5+δ cobaltite for improving its properties was used. It was shown that this strategy makes it possible to increase electrical conductivity and thermal stability of the samples as well as to reduce ASR values and enlarge MPD (Table 4). The NdBa0.5Sr0.25Ca0.25Co2O5+δ cathode demonstrated a very low ASR value of 0.062 Ω cm2 at 1073 K and a maximum output power density of 812 mW cm−2 at 1073 K (Figure 7). This measurement was much higher than for NdBa0.5Sr0.5Co2O5+δ, proving the effectiveness of the co-doping strategy.
Through the electrical conductivity relaxation (ECR) test, the values of chemical bulk diffusion coefficient (Dchem) of oxygen in SmBa0.6Sr0.4Co2O5+δ were measured from 1.63 × 10−6 cm2 s−1 at 773 K to 1.41 × 10−5 cm2 s−1 at 973 K [126]. The temperature dependence of Dchem in a temperature range of 773–973 K is described by Equation (3):
Dchem = 1.77 × 10−5·exp[−68.039 (kJ mol−1)/(R·T)] (m2 s−1)
The oxygen transport properties of SmBa0.5Sr0.5Co2O5+δ as a potential cathode material for IT–SOFCs were investigated in [127]. The Dchem values for SmBa0.5Sr0.5Co2O5+δ were equal to 2.6 × 10−6, 9.1 × 10−6, and 1.8 × 10−5 cm2 s−1 at 773, 873, and 973 K, respectively. The activation energy of Dchem within 773–973 K was ~58 kJ mol−1. Oxygen permeation flux for the SmBa0.5Sr0.5Co2O5+δ membrane with a thickness of 1.00 mm increased from 0.143 mL min−1 cm−2 at 773 K to 0.406 mL min−1 cm−2 at 1073 K under synthetic air at a flow rate of 50 mL min−1 and helium at a rate of 25 mL min−1. The activation energies of oxygen permeation for a high-temperature region (973–1073 K) and a low-temperature region (773–923 K) were equal to ~24 and 7 kJ mol−1, respectively, suggesting that the oxygen diffusion in the high-temperature and low-temperature ranges occurred via surface exchange and bulk diffusion mechanisms, respectively.

4.3. B-Site Deficient and B-Site Substituted LnBaCo2O5+δ Layered Perovskites

Co-deficient PrBaCo2−xO6–δ (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.1) perovskites were prepared and investigated in [128]. It was found that increasing the concentration of the vacancies in the Co-sublattice ledto an increase in lattice constants and oxygen nonstoichiometry (δ), additionally, the electrical conductivity decreased and electrochemical performance of PrBaCo2–xO6–δ cathodes improved. The minimum value of ASR and the maximum value of MPD were found for PrBaCo1.94O6–δ, they were 0.059 Ω cm2 at 973 K and 889 mW cm−2 at 923 K, respectively. This was 16% lower and higher, respectively, than for the cation-stoichiometric PrBaCo2O6–δ phase. The thermal stability of the samples did not change due to the formation of Co-deficiency. Table 5 shows some typical results concerning the electrochemical performance of SOFCs with a B-site substituted REE-barium layered cobaltites as cathodes.
A partial substitution of cobalt in LnBaCo2O5+δ perovskites by low-valence Ni- [129,130,131], Zn- [132], or Cu- [86,131,133,134,135] ions led to a slight increase intheir lattice constants [131] and a decrease in oxygen content (δ) [131,132], TEC [129,130,134,135], and electrical conductivity values [86,129,130,131,134]. In some cases, such a substitution improved the electrochemical performance of the derived cathode materials [129,130,132,134]. For Cu-doped SmBa0.5Sr0.5Co1.5Cu0.5O5+δ and YBaCoCuO5+δ perovskites, the ASR values were larger and the maximum power density were smaller than for their Cu-free SmBa0.5Sr0.5Co2O5+δ and YBaCo2O5+δ counterparts. Moreover, Cu-doped materials showed better long-term stability [86,133,134].
In [136], it was found that a partial substitution of cobalt withhigh-valence tantalum in PrBa0.94Co2O5+δ stabilizes the A-site-ordered layered perovskite structure, slightly increases TEC and electrical conductivity of the samples, and improves catalytic activity towards ORR. The optimal composition, PrBa0.94Co1.96Ta0.04O5+δ, exhibits the lowest polarization resistance (0.020 Ω cm2 at 973 K) and the highest power density of 1050 mW cm−2 at 973 K and is operated steadily at a loading voltage of 0.6 V over 100 h at 923 K. The PrBa0.94Co1.96Ta0.04O5+δ cathode showed excellent tolerance to CO2, as evidenced by its durable polarization resistance of 0.061 Ω cm2 at 973 K in air with 10 vol.% of CO2. A partial substitution of cobalt by high-valence molybdenum ions in PrBaCo2−xMoxO5+δ almost did not affect the crystal structure of the parent oxide but decreased its TEC and electrical conductivity values [137]. The polarization resistance of the PrBaCo1.97Mo0.03O5+δ (PBCM–0.03) cathode was 0.067 Ω cm2 at 973 K, which was slightly higher than for the pristine PrBaCo2O5+δ cathode (PBCO) (0.060 Ω cm2 at 973 K). The maximum power density of the single cells containing thePBCM–0.03 and PBCO cathodes at 973 K attained 343 and 339 mW cm−2, respectively. It was also found in [137] that trace amounts of high-valence Mo-doping in the PrBaCo2O5+δ cathode improved its electrochemical stability. So, generally, the results obtained in [137] showed that PrBaCo2−xMnxO5+δ solid solutions are attractive for applications as SOFCs cathodes.
The isovalent Co-by-Mn substitution in LODPs was studied in [138,139,140,141]. It was found that the TEC and electrical conductivity of SmSrCo2−xMnxO5+δ (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) perovskites decreased with increasing x. The electrochemical performance of SmSrCo2O5+δ slightly decreased after Mn-doping; however, reduced TEC and good chemical compatibility with GDC indicate that these materials may be used as SOFCs cathodes. Similar results were observed in another work [139], where GdBaCo2–xMnxO5+δ (0 ≤ x ≤ 2) was formed within the whole studied composition region. Mn-doped oxides showed lower electrical conductivity and increased polarization resistance. Nevertheless, these materials exhibited an increased oxygen content (δ) and reduced TEC values. Moderate TEC values and good catalytic activity in ORR were found for the LnBaCo2−xMnxO5+δ perovskites [140,141].
The effect of the partial substitution of cobalt with iron in layered perovskites of REE and barium and their A-site-deficient and A-site-substituted derivatives was intensively studied in a number of works [86,131,135,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158]. It was found that Fe-doping results in an increase of lattice constants [131,143,144,145,147,148,151,153,154,157] and oxygen contents [131,146]. Electrical conductivity of such Fe-doped cobaltites decreases with Fe-doping [143,145,146,147,153,154,157]. TECs also decreased [143,147,153], though some works reported an inverse tendency [131,144]. The Fe-doping usually improved the electrochemical performance of the layered cobaltites as SOFCs cathodes, but, in a number of works, increased polarization resistances [144,145] or reduced power densities [142,144] were reported, showing that the final properties of materials depend on both chemical compositions of LODPs and the prehistory of their preparation.
Lee et al. [151] compared the electrochemical performance of the Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3–δ single perovskite and the NdBa0.5Sr0.5Co1.5Fe0.5O5+δ double perovskite when operated in single cells at different conditions (Figure 8) and demonstrated excellent stability of double perovskite in harsh SOFC environments, including high humidity and low flow rate of air.
In [149,152] it was found that a partial Fe-to-Co substitution in layered cobaltites increases the oxygen-ion diffusion coefficient (Table 6), which should improve the electrochemical activity of these compounds in terms of ORR.
A suspension plasma-sprayed PrBa0.5Sr0.5Co1.6Fe0.4O5+δ (PBSCF) cathode operating in a symmetrical cell of PBSCF|ScSZ|PBSCF (ScSZ—scandia stabilized zirconia) and a single cell of Ni–GDC|ScSZ|PBSCF showed good electrochemical performance with as low a ASR value as 0.074 Ω cm2 and 0.012 Ω cm2at 873 K and 973 K, respectively, peak power densities of 370, 800, and 1350 mW cm−2 at 773 K, 873 K, and 973 K, respectively, as well as excellent long-term stability (its polarization resistance remained practically constant during isothermal dwelling at 973 K for 300 h) [154].
In [158], a symmetrical SOFC with LSGM and PrBaCo0.2Fe1.8O5+δ (PBCF) as a cathode was prepared and tested during its operation with different fuels. According to X-ray diffractometry (XRD) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) results, the PrBaCo0.2Fe1.8O5+δ compound had good chemical compatibility with the LSGM electrolyte. At 1073 K, the polarization resistance values of the PBCF symmetrical electrodes were 0.026 and 0.319 Ω cm2 in air and H2, respectively. The output performances of the electrolyte-supported single cell with the PBFC symmetrical electrodes were 735, 626, and 268 mW cm−2 at 1123 K under H2, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), and C2H5OH fuel, respectively. This cell showed long-term stability at 1023 K for 40 h and 60 h with H2 and LPG as the fuel, respectively.
The co-doping strategy was used in [159,160,161] to improve the electrochemical performance of LnBaCo2O5+δ cathodes. The XPS results showed that REE and transition metal (TM) ions in PrBaCo2/3Fe2/3Cu2/3O5+δ (PCFC) exist in two different valence states (Pr3+/Pr4+, Co3+/Co4+, Fe3+/Fe4+, and Cu+/Cu2+). The TEC value of this compound was equal to 16.6 × 10−6 K−1, which was much smaller than that ofthe unsubstituted layered cobaltite. The polarization resistance values of the PCFC cathode on the SDC and GDC electrolytes were 0.144 and 0.038 Ω cm2 at 1073 K, respectively. The maximum power density of a single cell with PCFC on a 300 μm-thick GDC electrolyte reached 659 mW cm−2 at 1073 K [159]. Similar results were obtained for the NdBaCo2/3Fe2/3Cu2/3O5+δ (NBCFC) double perovskite, theTEC of which was 15.7 × 10−6 K−1 within a temperature range of 303–1123 K. The values of the polarization resistance of NBCFC were 0.056 and 0.023 Ω cm2 at 1073 K with the Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.9 and La0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3–δ electrolytes, respectively [160]. Co-substitution with Fe and Mn sharply decreased the TEC from 21.5·10−6 K−1 for PrBaCo2O5+δ to 17.8 × 10−6 K−1 for PrBaCo2/3Fe2/3Mn1/2O5+δ (PBCFM) at a temperature range of 303–1273 K [161]. When using 300μm-thick Sm0.2Ce0.8O1.9 (SDC) as an electrolyte, the ASR and maximum power density values were equal to 0.028 Ω cm2 and 588 mW cm−2 at 1073 K, respectively. The SDC-impregnated PBCFM composite cathode showed improved electrochemical characteristics; its ASR and peak power density were 0.23 Ω cm2 and 621 mW cm−2 at 1073 K, respectively.

4.4. Composites Based on LnBaCo2O5+δ Layered Perovskites

Composites of layered cobaltites with different solid electrolytes were extensively studied as possible cathode materials for SOFCs based on both oxygen-ion [87,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169] and proton-conducting solid electrolytes (SE) [170,171], as well as oxygen separation membranes [172,173]. The addition of SE to the layered cobaltites lowers their TEC values [87,162,164,165,166], making them more chemically and thermomechanically compatible with electrolytes; it also considerably improves the electrochemical performance of composite cathodes in comparison with the single-phase ones due to the enlarging active zones at which ORR can occur [162,163,165,166,168,169,170,171].
The addition of 20 wt.% of Bi2O3 to LaBaCo2O5+δ resulted in the lowest ASR value (0.020 Ω cm2 at 1073 K in air), which was about a seventh of that of the LaBaCo2O5+δ cathode in the same conditions [163]. At a current density of 0.2 A cm−2, the cathodic overpotential of LaBaCo2O5+δ+20 wt.%Bi2O3 was approximately 12.6 mV at 973 K, while the corresponding value for LaBaCo2O5+δ was 51.0 mV.
In [165], the EuBa0.98Co2O5+δ+x wt.%Ce0.9Sm0.1O1.9 (EBCO–xSDC) (0 ≤ x ≤ 40) composites were systematically studied as cathode materials for SOFCs. It was found that EBCO–xSDC materials had excellent electrocatalytic ORR activity due to the synergistic effects of the high electronic-conducting EBCO phase and ionic-conducting SDC electrolyte. The best cathode performance among the studied composites was exhibited by the EBCO–20SDC material (0.028 Ω cm2 at 973 in air), when tested in a single-cell Ni–YSZ|YSZ|CGO|EBCO–20SDC (Figure 9). A high power density of 980 mW cm−2 at 973 K was achieved, which was approximately two times higher than that for the EBCO cathode-based fuel cell. The results of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) showed that the charge transfer was the rate-limiting step at the cathode interface. The addition of SDC to the EBCO improved both the charge transfer reaction and the gas diffusion process due to the high oxygen-ion conductivity and large surface of the SDC electrolyte.
Idrees et al. [168], using a facile and effective one-pot sol-gel method, prepared a PrBa0.92Co2O6–δ–40 wt.%Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9 (OPCC) composite cathode material and comparatively studied its electrochemical performance in tandem with a composite cathode with the same composition which was synthesized by means of a traditional ball-milling method (BMCC), as well as with the single-phase PrBa0.92Co2O6–δ cathode. Among the three studied cathodes, OPCC showed the lowest ASR (0.015 Ω cm2 at 1023 K), indicating the highest ORR catalytic activity. The OPCC-based anode-supported single cell demonstrated the highest peak power densities, with a typical value of 1011 mW cm−2 at 1023 K in contrast to 783 mW cm−2 for the BMCC-based cell and 574 mW cm–2 for the PrBa0.92Co2O6–δ–based cell. The OPCC-based cell also showed stable performance without obvious degradation over 100 h at 973 K.
In [169], the Pr0.95BaCo2O6–δxCe0.8Sm0.2O1.9 (x = 0, 30, 40, 50) composites (PBCO–xSDC) were successfully prepared and investigated. It was found that the addition of SDC to the Pr3+-deficient perovskite decreased its TEC and electrical conductivity values but enhanced its catalytic activity over ORR. The best electrochemical performance was shown by the PBCO–40SDC cathode, for which ASR was 0.005 Ω cm2 at 1023 K. An anode-supported single cell with this cathode demonstrated high peak power densities, such as 1171 mW cm−2 at 1023 K and 917 mW cm−2 at 973 K.
Electrical conductivity and oxygen permeability of the Ce0.8Gd0.2O2–δ–GdBaCo2O5+δ (CGO–GBCO) and Ce0.8Gd0.2O2–δ–PrBaCo2O5+δ (CGO–PBCO) dual-phase composites were studied in [172,173]. The thermally activated oxygen permeation flux reached 0.28 mL min−1 cm−2 at air/He condition for the 0.62 mm-thick CGO–GBCO specimen at 1223 K, which was an order of magnitude larger than that of the GBCO specimen at the same conditions [172]. For the CGO–PBCO (6/4) membrane with 0.6 mm in thickness, oxygen flux was as large as 2.38·10−7 mol cm−2 s−1 at 1198 K [173]. It was found that the CGO and PBCO phases exhibited good chemical compatibility and structural stability.
In [174], the Nd1–xBaCo2O5+δ+x/2Bi2O3 (x = 0.05, 0.1) composites were synthesized via a glycine–nitrate process. The addition of bismuth oxide to the Nd3+-deficienced ceramics effectively increased their electrical conductivity and reduced TEC. Polarization resistance and the maximum power density of the Nd0.95BaCo2O5+δ+0.125Bi2O3 composite cathode at 1073 K were 0.026 Ω cm2 and 720 mW cm−2, respectively.
NdSrCo2O5+δ (NSCO) perovskite was used as a cathode material for the Ce0.8Gd0.2O2–δ (GDC)-supported microtubular solid oxide fuel cells (MT–SOFCs) [175]. The MT–SOFC with an outer tube diameter of 1.86 mm, an electrolyte thickness of 180 μm, and an NSCO–GDC (1:1) composite cathode presented the best electrochemical performance. The flexural strength of this cell was 177 MPa, ohmic and polarization resistance values of the cell were 0.15 and 0.03 Ω cm2 at 1073 K, and its maximum power density reached 0.67 W cm−2 at 1073 K.

4.5. LnBaMe’Me”O5+δ Layered Perovskites and Their Solid Solutions

LnBaMeMe”O5+δ are LODPs, the B-sites of which are occupied by two transition metals (usually 3d-metals) taken in the same quantities. These phases, similar to layered cobaltites of REE and barium, were intensively studied as possible cathode materials for SOFCs [176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190]. Some typical results demonstrating their electrochemical performance are collected in Table 7. As can be seen from these data, LnBaMeMe”O5+δ phases may be used as SOFCs cathodes with both oxygen-ion conducting (Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9, La0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3–δ, and Gd0.1Ce0.9O1.95) and proton-conducting (BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.2O3–δ) solid electrolytes; at the same time, they demonstrate high electrochemical activity in ORR, which is close to the activity of layered REE–barium cobaltites and their derivatives. The electrochemical performance of LnBaMeMe”O5+δ compounds may be improved by the addition of solid electrolytes with the formation of composites [182,185,186], partial cation substitution [187,190], or creation of A-site deficiency [188].
The GdBaFeNiO5+δ material exhibits good chemical compatibility with the Sm0.2Ce0.8O1.9 electrolyte at temperatures below 1273 K; its ASR value is 0.219 Ω cm2 at 1073 K, and the maximum power density of the Ni–Sm0.2Ce0.8O1.9|Sm0.2Ce0.8O1.9|GdBaFeNiO5+δ single cell reaches 287 mW cm−2 at 1073 K [185]. The activity and performance of the GdBaFeNiO5+δ cathode can be improved by the impregnation of nano-sized Sm0.2Ce0.8O1.9 particles: the polarization resistance is decreased by more than 14 times (down to 0.065 Ω cm2 at 1073 K), and the maximum power density of the single cell increased by 1.9 times (up to 515 mW cm−2 at 1073 K).
The La1.4Ca0.6CoMnO5+δ (LCCM) material has a monoclinic structure, high structural stability up to 1173 K, and exhibits good chemical compatibility with the La0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3–δ (LSGM) and Sm0.2Ce0.8O1.9 (SDC) electrolytes at temperatures of up to 1273 K. The maximum power density of a NiO–SDC|SDC|LSGM|LCCM single cell reaches 445 mW cm−2 at 1073 K [186]. The electrochemical performance, thermal expansion behavior, and stability of LCCM improve by adding appropriate amounts of SDC. The LCCM–30 wt.%SDC composite cathode shows the increased electrochemical performance: the ASR is decreased by 68% and the maximum power density is increased by 22%.
A partial substitution of Ba with Ca in NdBaCoCuO5+δ resulted in decreased TEC and oxygen content and increased the electrical conductivity in air [187]. Compared to the parent oxide, the modified sample has a greatly enhanced electrochemical performance. The ASR of NdBa1−xCaxCoCuO5+δ-based symmetrical cells with a Gd0.1Ce0.9O1.95 electrolyte at 973 K dropped from 0.062 Ω cm2 for x = 0 to 0.038 Ω cm2 for x = 0.3. The maximum power density for NdBa1−xCaxCoCuO5+δ-based single cells at 1073 K increased from 1420 mW cm−2 for x = 0 to 1840 mW cm−2 for x = 0.3 (Figure 10).
The Y1–xBaCoCuO5+δ (x = 0.00, 0.03, 0.05, 0.07, 0.10) layered perovskites with a Y3+-deficiency were studied as cathodes for SOFCs in work [188]. These compounds crystallize in orthorhombic syngony, and their lattice constants increase with an increasing Y3+ deficiency. The oxygen content and electrical conductivity values of Y1−xBaCoCuO5+δ decrease as x increases. The results of EIS studies indicate that the creation of a Y3+deficiency reduces the polarization resistance, the lowest value of which was 0.029 Ω cm2 at 1073 K and was observed for the Y0.93BaCoCuO5+δ sample. The LSGM electrolyte-supported single cell with the Y0.93BaCoCuO5+δ cathode demonstrated the peak power density values of 862, 643, 426, 274, and 152 mW cm−2 at 1123, 1073, 1023, 973, and 923 K, respectively.

4.6. The Other Layered Oxygen-Deficient Double Perovskites

Layered double cobaltites usually display high electronic and ionic conductivity, as well as high electrocatalytic activity in the ORR, but they have some drawbacks, such as high TEC values (providing relatively low thermomechanical compatibility of layered cobaltites and typical solid electrolytes in SOFCs), high cost, etc. [191]. These disadvantages are overcome in Co-free perovskite cathodes, including double perovskites, such as GdBaFeNiO5+δ [183,185] and layered ferrites of REEs and barium [89,158,192,193,194,195,196,197]. The main advantage of layered ferrites is their high stability levels in both oxidizing and reducing atmospheres [4,191]; this makes them promising electrode materials for A–SOFCs [89,192,193,194,196], and S–SOFCs [158,195,197] based on oxygen-ion-conducting [158,194,195,196] and proton-conducting [89,193,197] electrolytes.
The electrical conductivity and thermal expansion of LnBaFe2O5+δ (Ln = La, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd, and Y)-layered ferrites decreased at smaller Ln3+ ionic radii; for example,TEC values within 293–1173 K temperature intervals decreased from 19.4 × 10−6 K−1 for Ln = La to 14.6 × 10−6 K−1 for Ln = Y [192]. The lowest polarization resistance in air under an open circuit voltage was found for the SmBaFe2O5+δ electrode (YSZ as the electrolyte): 0.043 Ω cm2 at 1073 K. The single cell with this material serving as its cathode delivered the highest peak power density of 1026 mW cm−2 at 1073 K [192]. The LaBa0.5Sr0.5Fe2O6–δ cathode showed a low polarization resistance of 0.152 Ω cm2 at 1023 K and a maximum power density of 370 mW cm−2 in a LaBa0.5Sr0.5Fe2O6–δ|SDC|LaBa0.5Sr0.5Fe2O6–δ S–SOFC [194].
Figure 11 shows the electrochemical performance of the S–SOFC with a GdBaFe2O5+δ|La0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3–δ|GdBaFe2O5+δ configuration when using dry H2, humidified syngas (61% H2, 24% CH4, 9.3% CO, 3.4% N2, 2.3% CO2, and 5 ppm H2S), and humidified CH4 (3% H2O) as the fuels and the ambient air as the oxidant. The maximum peak power density of this cell at 1125 K was 1053, 868, and 197 mW cm−2 for the different fuels, respectively. The observed results indicate that this cell can efficiently operate with complex hydrocarbons fuels. This cell was also tested under a constant potential of 0.35 V with CH4 as fuel at 973 K for 120 h to assess the carbon tolerance of the GdBaFe2O5+δ anode and the stability of the cell (Figure 11d). No degradation of the cell performance was observed. The Raman spectrum (inset in Figure 11d) shows no peaks corresponding to the carbon deposited on the GdBaFe2O5+δ anode surface, indicating that this material has a high coking tolerance. The peak at ca. 1300 cm−1 was assigned to FeOOH and was formed because a small part of exsolved iron nanoparticles reacted with water in humidified CH4.
The oxygen transport properties and the chemical stability of PrBaFe2O5+δ (PBF)-layered double perovskite were systematically studied in [198]. The oxygen permeation flux of 0.7 mm-thick samples and the oxygen-ion conductivity were 4.7 × 10–1 mL min−1 cm−2 and 0.12 Scm−1 at 1173 K, respectively. The characteristic thickness estimated from the membrane and conductivity relaxation tests was ~0.6 mm at 1173 K. The PBF oxide exhibited superior chemical stability in CO2-containing atmosphere.
Layered manganites of barium and REEs (for example, PrBaMn2O5+δ) have been considered as possible electrode materials both for A–SOFCs and S–SOFCs, as well as for SOECs cathodes [199,200,201]. The high thermal stability of Fe-doped PrBaMn2–xFexO6–δ perovskites both in oxidizing and reducing atmospheres and the moderate TEC values make these phases good candidates for electrochemical applications [200]. These phases may exchange relatively large amounts of oxygen with the atmosphere, which makes them promising oxygen storage materials as well.
The Sr-deficient Sr1.9FeNb0.9Mo0.1O6–δ double perovskite was prepared via a solid state reaction method and tested as the electrode in S–SOFCs [202]. The electrocatalytic activity of Sr1.9FeNb0.9Mo0.1O6–δ was greatly improved by the impregnation of the solution of Pd(NO3)2 to form Pd–Sr1.9FeNb0.9Mo0.1O6–δ composite electrodes. The single cell with such symmetrical electrodes after two-time impregnation achieved the peak power densities of 935.4, 196.5, and 11.2 mW cm−2 at 1123 K in dry H2, humidified CH4, and 17CH4–83CO2 mixed gas, respectively, revealing superior performance in different fuels.
In [90], it was shown that Sr2Co1−xNbxFeO5+δ (x = 0.0–0.2) double perovskites have good structural stability and chemical compatibility with La0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3–δ and Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9 electrolytes. The ASR of the Sr2Co1.9Nb0.1FeO5+δ cathode was 0.081 Ω cm2 at 973 K on the LSGM electrolyte. This cathode showed good electrocatalytic activity for ORR, functional stability, and high electrical conductivity.
The possibility of using Sr2Sc0.1Nb0.1Co1.5Fe0.3O6–2δ thin films as cathodes for IT–SOFCs was tested in [203]. It was found that the film grown along the [110] direction on the YSZ substrate demonstrated lower polarization resistances and smaller activation energy than the film grown along the [100] direction on the SDC/YSZ substrate, indicating better ORR activity. It was also found that the lower Sr-enrichment and higher cobalt-ion oxidation states were beneficial for the ORR.
The La-deficient La2−xCoTiO6–δ (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.20) double perovskites were chemically stable under oxidizing conditions towards CGO, whereas they reacted with YSZ [204]. The La2−xCoTiO6–δ/Ce0.8Gd0.2O1.9 composites were studied as electrodes of symmetrical cells. The lowest polarization resistance of 0.39 Ω cm2 at 1073 K was found for materials with x = 0.05.

4.7. Short Resume

Layered oxygen-deficient double perovskites (primarily cobaltites and their derivatives) are promising cathode materials for IT–SOFCs due to their high electrocatalytic activity in ORR, stability at elevated temperatures and chemical and thermomechanical compatibility with solid electrolytes.
Despite numerous advantages, LODPs have a number of drawbacks in terms of their applications in SOFCs. The literature analyses performed above shows that the main problems are their degradation in CO2-containing atmospheres and relatively large TEC values, as well as chemical expansion at high temperatures due to the loss of weakly-bonded oxygen.
These disadvantages can be eliminated or reduced by tuning the chemical composition of the LODPs or by producing their composites containing different solid electrolytes as a second phase. The electrochemical performance of LODPs can be essentially improved both by the substitution of cations in their A- or/and B-sublattices or by the creation of small cation deficiencies in the A-sublattice (Figure 12). The TEC values and chemical expansion of the LODPs may be reduced by the formation of high-entropy oxides (HEOs) on their base, in which A- or/and B-positions are shared by at least five REEs (as well as alkaline–earth elements) and transition metals, respectively, in equal or near-equal atomic ratios. Such HEOs should be more stable and possess lower polarization resistances compared when with other cathodes based on LODPs. The addition of solid electrolytes to LODPs lowers their TECs and makes them more chemically and thermomechanically compatible with electrolytes and can also improve the electrochemical performanceof composite cathodes due to enlarging the zones of the ORRs. The creation of a hierarchical porous microstructure of cathodes also enlarges the areas of the ORRs and improves their electrochemical and electrocatalytical performance.
LODPs based on light REEs have small oxygen deficiencies (large amounts of weakly-bonded oxygen), high values of the Seebeck coefficient, and electrical conductivity, and they also contain transition metal ions in different oxidation states. For these reasons they may be used as high-temperature thermoelectrics, oxygen storage materials, or photocatalysts for the oxidation of organic substances.

5. Conclusions

Layered oxygen-deficient perovskites (LODPs) are considered promising candidates for use as cathodes in IT–SOFC applications. In this review, we shortly summarized the available literature data concerning their crystal structure, thermal, and electrotransport and functional, especially electrochemical, properties. The phase transitions of different natures (structural, electric, and magnetic), which take place in LODPs due to the variations of temperature and their chemical composition, were also discussed. The electrochemical performance of materials belonging to different groups of LODPs (cobaltites, ferrites, etc.) in single cells based on both oxygen-ion- and proton-conducting solid electrolytes was found to be quite high for applied purposes. The main focus was on various chemical engineering approaches to improve the electrochemical activity of these materials (creation of cationic deficiencies, doping on different sites, modification by noble metals and solid electrolytes nanoparticles, etc.). It was demonstrated that some LODPs can effectively operate as electrodes of symmetrical SOFCs fueled with hydrogen, methane, or complex hydrocarbons. The other possible areas of usage of these complex oxides (high-temperature thermoelectrics, oxygen storage materials, photocatalysts, etc.) were alsofinally depicted.
Although this work overviews the last trends in LODPs, a number of recent publications fell within the reviewing procedure. In our opinion, these works [205,206,207,208,209,210,211] should be mentioned with no detailed analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: A.I.K. and E.A.C.; formal analysis: A.I.K. and D.S.K.; data curation: E.A.C. and D.S.K.; writing—original draft preparation: A.I.K. and E.A.C.; writing—review and editing: D.S.K. and D.A.M.; visualization: E.A.C. and D.S.K.; supervision: A.I.K. and D.A.M.; project administration: A.I.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

A.I. Klyndyuk thanks to the Ministry of Education of Belarus Republic, contract no. 20062703, and to the Belarusian Republican Foundation for Fundamental Research, grant no. C3M–049. D.A. Medvedev thanks to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, contract no. 075-03-2021-051/5.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lenser, C.; Udomsilp, D.; Menzler, N.H.; Holtappels, P.; Fujisaki, L.; Matsumoto, H.; Sabato, A.G.; Smeacetto, F.; Chrysanthou, A.; Molin, S. Solid oxide fuel and electrolysis cells. In Advanced Ceramics for Energy Conversion and Storage; Guillon, O., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Oxford, UK; Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 387–547. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lyu, Y.; Xie, J.; Wang, D.; Wang, J. Review of cell performance in solid oxide fuel cells. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 7184–7207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Filippov, S.P.; Yaroslavtsev, A.B. Hydrogen energy: Development prospects and materials. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2021, 90, 627–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Istomin, S.Y.; Lyskov, N.V.; Mazo, G.N.; Antipov, E.V. Electrode materials based on complex d-metal oxides for symmetrical solid oxide fuel cells. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2021, 90, 644–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kharton, V.V.; Marques, F.M.B.; Atkinson, A. Transport properties of solid oxide electrolyte ceramics: A brief review. Solid State Ion. 2004, 174, 135–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jacobson, A.J. Materials for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 660–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Irshad, M.; Siraj, K.; Raza, R.; Ali, A.; Tiwari, P.; Zhu, B.; Rafique, A.; Ali, A.; Ullah, M.K.; Usman, A. A Brief Desription of High Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cell’s Operation, Materials, Design, Fabrication Technologies and Performance. Appl. Sci. 2016, 6, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. da Silva, F.S.; de Souza, T.M. Novel materials for solid oxide fuel cell technologies: A literature review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 26020–26036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Hussain, S.; Yangping, L. Review of solid oxide fuel cell materials: Cathode, anode, and electrolyte. Energy Transit. 2020, 4, 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vostakola, M.F.; Horri, B.A. Progress in Materials Development for Low-Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: A Review. Energies 2021, 14, 1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dudek, M.; Lis, B.; Lach, R.; Daugela, S.; Šalkus, T.; Kežionis, A.; Mosiałek, M.; Socha, R.; Morgiel, J.; Gajek, M.; et al. Ba0.95Ca0.05Ce0.9Y0.1O3 as electrolyte for proton-conducting ceramic fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 304, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Molenda, J.; Kupecki, J.; Baron, R.; Blesznowski, M.; Brus, G.; Brylewski, T.; Busko, M.; Chmielowec, J.; Cwieka, K.; Gazda, M.; et al. Status report on high temperature fuel cells in Poland—Recent advances and achievements. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 4366–4403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Plazaola, A.A.; Labella, A.C.; Liu, Y.; Porras, N.B.; Tanaka, D.A.P.; Annaland, M.V.S.; Gallucci, F. Mixed Ionic–Electronic Conducting Membranes (MIEC) for Their Application in Membrane Reactors: A Review. Processes 2019, 7, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Khan, M.S.; Xu, X.; Knibbe, R.; Zhu, Z. Air electrodes and related degradation mechanisms in solid oxide electrolysis and reversible solid oxide fuel cells. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2021, 143, 110918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, R.-T.; Chang, H.-Y.; Wang, J.-C. An Overview on the Novel Core-Shell Electrodes for solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) Using Polymeric Methodology. Polymers 2021, 13, 2774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lu, Y.; Mi, Y.; Li, J.; Qi, F.; Yan, S.; Dong, W. Recent Progress in Semiconductor-Ionic Conductor Nanomaterial as a Membrane for Low-Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kalinina, E.; Pikalova, E. Opportunities, Challenges and Prospects for Electrodeposition of Thin-Film Functional Layers in Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Technology. Materials 2021, 14, 5584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, J.; Ma, J.; Zhang, Z.; Qin, Y.; Wang, Y.-J.; Wang, Y.; Tan, R.; Duan, X.; Tian, T.Z.; Zhang, C.H.; et al. 2021 Roadmap: Electrocatalysis for green catalytic processes. J. Phys. Mater. 2021, 4, 022004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, G.; Feldhoff, A.; Weidenkaff, A.; Li, C.; Liu, S.; Zhu, X.; Sunarso, J.; Huang, K.; Wu, X.-Y.; Ghoniem, A.F.; et al. Roadmap ob Sustaninable Mixed Ionic-Electronic Conducting Membranes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2105702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, S.; Kim, G.; Manthiram, A. A review on infiltration technoques for energy conversion and storage devices: From fundamentals fo applications. Sust. Energy Fuels 2021, 5, 5024–5037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mendonça, C.; Ferreira, A.; Santos, D.M.F. Towards the Commercialization of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: Recent Advances in Materials and Integration Strategies. Fuels 2021, 2, 393–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hanif, M.B.; Rauf, S.; Motola, M.; Babar, Z.U.D.; Li, C.-J. Recent progress of perovskite-based electrolyte materials for solid oxide fuel cells and performance optimizing strategies for energy storage applications. Mat. Res. Bull. 2022, 146, 111612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cigolotti, V.; Genovese, M.; Fragiacomo, P. Comprehensive Review on Fuel Cell Technology for Stationary Applications as Sustainable and Efficient Poly-Generation Energy Systems. Energies 2021, 14, 4963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Skutina, L.S.; Vylkov, A.A.; Kuznetsov, D.K.; Medvedev, D.A.; Shur, Y. Tailoring Ni and Sr2Mg0.25Ni0.75MoO6–δ Cermet Compositions for Designing the Fuel Electrodes of Solid Oxide Electrochemical Cells. Energies 2019, 12, 2394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Skutina, L.; Filonova, E.; Medvedev, D.; Maignan, A. Undoped Sr2MMoO6 Double Perovskite Molybdates (M = Ni, Mg, Fe) as Promising Anode Materials for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Materials 2021, 14, 1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Klyndyuk, A.I. Layered Perovskite–Like Oxides 0112 Type: Structure, Properties, and Possible Applications. In Advanced in Chemistry Research; Taylor, J.C., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 59–105. [Google Scholar]
  27. Sun, C.; Hui, R.; Roller, J. Cathode materials for solid oxide fuel cells: A review. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2010, 14, 1125–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tahir, N.N.M.; Baharuddin, N.A.; Samat, A.A.; Osman, N.; Somalu, M.R. A review on cahtode materials for conventional and proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 894, 162458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Khan, M.Z.; Song, R.-H.; Mehran, M.T.; Lee, S.-B.; Lim, T.-H. Controlling cation migration and inter-diffusion across cathode/interlayer/electrolyte interfaces of solid oxide fuel cells: A review. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 5839–5869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, F.; Kishimoto, H.; Ishihara, T.; Develos-Bagarinao, K.; Yamaji, K.; Horita, T.; Yokokawa, H. A review of sulfur poisoning of solid oxide fuel cell cathode materials for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Source 2020, 478, 228763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shen, M.; Zhang, P. Progress and challenges of cathode contact layer for solid oxide fuel cell. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 33876–33894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Aziz, A.J.A.; Baharuddin, N.A.; Somalu, M.R.; Muchtar, A. Review of composite cathodes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cell applications. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 23314–23325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Qiu, P.; Yang, X.; Zhu, T.; Sun, S.; Jia, L.; Li, J. Review on core-shell structured cathode for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 23160–23173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kaur, P.; Singh, K. Review of perovskite-structure related cathode materials for solid oxide fuel cells. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 5521–5535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yatoo, M.A.; Kawale, S.S.; Skinner, S.J. Perovskite and layered oxide materials for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells. In Intermediate Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells; Kaur, G., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Oxford, UK; Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 315–346. [Google Scholar]
  36. Irvine, J.; Rupp, J.L.M.; Liu, G.; Xu, X.; Haile, S.; Qian, X.; Snyder, A.; Freer, R.; Efren, D.; Skinner, S.; et al. Roadmap on inorganic perovskites for energy applications. J. Phys. Energy 2021, 3, 031502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Su, C.; Wang, W.; Shao, Z. Cation-Deficient Perovskites for Clean Energy Conversion. Acc. Mater. Res. 2021, 2, 477–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nechache, A.; Hody, S. Alternative and innovative solid oxide electrolysis cell materials: A review. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2021, 149, 111322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hanif, M.B.; Motola, M.; Rauf, S.; Li, C.-J.; Li, C.-X. Recent advancements, doping strategies and the future prespective of perovskite-based solid oxide fuel cells for energy conversion. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 428, 132603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gao, Z.; Mogni, L.V.; Miller, E.C.; Railsback, J.C.; Barnett, S.A. A perspective on low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1602–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Afroze, S.; Karim, A.H.; Cheok, Q.; Eriksson, S.; Azad, A.K. Latest development of double perovskite electrode materials for solid oxide fuel cells: A review. Front. Energy 2019, 13, 770–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bello, I.T.; Zhai, S.; He, Q.; Xu, Q.; Ni, M. Scientometric review of advancements in the development of high-performance cathode for low and intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells: Three decades in retrospect. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 26518–26536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kasyanova, A.V.; Tarutina, L.R.; Rudenko, A.O.; Lyagaeva, J.G.; Medvedev, D.A. Ba(Ce,Zr)O3–based electrodes for protonic ceramic electrochemical cells: Towards highly compatible functionality and triple-conducting behaviour. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2020, 89, 667–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mather, G.C.; Muñoz-Gil, D.; Zamudio-García, J.; Porras-Vázquez, J.M.; Marrero-López, D.; Pérez-Coll, D. Perspectives on Cathodes for Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Seong, A.; Kim, J.; Jeong, D.; Sengodan, S.; Liu, M.; Choi, S.; Kim, G. Electrokinetic Proton Transport in Triple (H+/O2–/e) Conducting Oxides as a Key Descriptor for Highly Efficient Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2004099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Samat, A.A.; Darus, M.; Osman, N.; Baharuddin, N.A.; Anwar, M. A Short Review on Triple Conducting Oxide Cathode Materials for Proton onducting Oxide Fuel Cell. AIP Conf. Proc. 2021, 2339, 020233. [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang, N.; Hinokuma, S.; Ina, T.; Zhu, C.; Habazaki, H.; Aoki, Y. Mixed Proton–electron–oxide ion Triple Conducting Manganite as Efficient Cobalt-free Cathode for Protonic ceramic Fuel Cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 11043–11055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Malyshkin, D.; Novikov, A.; Ivanov, I.; Sereda, V.; Tsvetkov, D.; Zuev, A. The origin of triple conductivity and water uptake in layered double perovskites: A case study on lanthanum-substituted GdBaCo2O6–δ. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 845, 156309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xiang, H.; Xing, Y.; Dai, F.-z.; Wang, H.; Su, L.; Miao, L.; Zhang, G.; Wang, Y.; Qi, X.; Yao, L.; et al. High-entropy ceramics: Present status, challenges, and a look forward. J. Adv. Ceram. 2021, 10, 385–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ma, Y.; Ma, Y.; Wang, Q.; Schweider, S.; Botros, M.; Fu, T.; Hahn, H.; Drezesinski, T.; Vreitung, B. High-entropy energy materials: Challenges and new opportunities. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 2883–2905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wright, A.J.; Luo, J. A step forward from high-entropy ceramics to compositionally complex ceramics: A new perspective. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 9812–9827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Shen, L.; Du, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, X.; Zhao, H. Medium-Entropy perovskites Sr(FeαTiβCoγMnζ)O3–δ as promising cathodes for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cell. Appl. Catal. B. Environ. 2021, 295, 120264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dąbrowa, J.; Olszewska, A.; Falkenstein, A.; Shwab, C.; Szymczak, M.; Zajusz, M.; Moździerz, M.; Mikuła, A.; Zielińska, K.; Berent, K.; et al. An innovative approach to design SOFC air electrode materials: High entropy La1–xSrx(Co,Cr,Fe,Mn,Ni)O3–δ (x = 0., 0.1, 0.2, 0.3) perovskites synthesized by the sol–gel method. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 24455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dąbrowa, J.; Zielińska, K.; Stepien, A.; Zajusz, M.; Nowakowska, M.; Moździerz, M.; Berent, K.; Szymczak, M.; Świerczek, K. Formation of Solid Solutions and Physicochemical Properties of the High-Entropy Ln1–xSrx(Co,Cr,Fe,Mn,Ni)O3–δ (Ln = La, Pr, Nd, Sm or Gd) Perovskites. Materials 2021, 14, 5264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Yang, Q.; Wang, G.; Wu, H.; Bashiwork, B.A.; Tian, D.; Zhu, S.; Yang, Y.; Lu, Y.; Ding, Y.; Ling, Y.; et al. A high-entropy perovskite cathode for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 872, 159633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bernuy-Lopez, C.; Høydalsvik, K.; Einarsrud, M.-A.; Grande, T. Effect of A-Site Ordering on Chemical Stability, Oxygen Stoichiometry and Electrical Conductivity in Layered LaBaCo2O5+δ Double Perovskite. Materials 2016, 9, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Malyshkin, D.A.; Novikov, A.Y.; Sereda, V.V.; Ivanov, I.L.; Tsvetkov, D.S.; Zuev, A.Y. In Situ and ex Situ Study of Cubic La0.5Ba0.5CoO3–δ to Double Perovskite LaBaCo2O6–δ Transition and Formation of Domain Textured Phases with Fast Oxygen Exchange Capability. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 12409–12416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Tsvetkov, D.S.; Ivanov, I.L.; Malyshkin, D.A.; Sednev, A.L.; Sereda, V.V.; Zuev, A.Y. Double perovskites REBaCo2–xMxO6–δ (RE = La, Pr, Nd, Eu, Gd; M = Fe, Mn) as energy-related materials: An overview. Pure Appl. Chem. 2019, 91, 923–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yasodha, P.; Premila, M.; Bharathi, A.; Valsakimar, M.C.; Rajaraman, R.; Sundar, C.S. Infrared spectroscopic study of the local structural changes across the metal insulator transition in nickel-doped GdBaCo2O5.5. J. Solid State Chem. 2010, 183, 2602–2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kundu, A.; Pralong, V.; Raveau, B.; Caignaert, V. Magnetic and electrical properties of ordered 112-type perovskite LnBaCoMnO5+δ (Ln = Nd, Eu). J. Mater. Sci. 2011, 46, 681–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Konne, J.L.; Davis, S.A.; Glatzel, S.; Hall, S.R. Synthesis of phase pure praseodimium barium copper iron oxide. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 5477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Klyndyuk, A.I.; Chizhova, E.A. Synthesis and Properties of LnBaFeCoO5+δ (Ln = Nd, Sm, Gd). Inorg. Mater. 2013, 49, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhuravleva, T.A. Electrophysical Properties of Layered Perovskites LnBaCo2–xCuxO5+δ (Ln = Sm, Nd) for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Rus. J. Electrochem. 2011, 47, 676–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Cherepanov, V.A.; Aksenova, T.V.; Gavrilova, L.Y.; Mikhaleva, K.N. Structure, nonstoichiometry of the NdBa(Co,Fe)2O5+δ layered perovskite. Solid State Ion. 2011, 188, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Świerczek, K. Physico-chemical properties of Ln0.5A0.5Co0.5Fe0.5O3–δ (Ln: La, Sm; A: Sr, Ba) cathode materials and their performance in electrolyte-supported Intermediate Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cell. J. Power Source 2011, 196, 7110–7116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Szpunar, I.; Strandbakke, R.; Sørby, M.H.; Wachowsky, S.L.; Balaguer, M.; Tarach, M.; Serra, J.M.; Witkowska, A.; Dzik, E.; Norby, T.; et al. High-Temperature Structural and Electrical Properties of BaLnCo2O6Positrodes. Materials 2020, 13, 4044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Galeano, V.; Zapata, V.H.; Ostos, C.; Morán, O. On the electrical properties of textured YBaCo2O5+δ thin layers tested by means of complex impedance spectroscopy. Vacuum 2020, 181, 109595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Taskin, A.; Lavrov, A. Origin of the large thermoelectric power in oxygen-variable RBaCo2O5 + x(R = Gd,Nd). Phys. Rev. 2006, 73, 1211101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Klyndyuk, A.I.; Chizhova, Y.e.A.; Sazanovich, N.V.; Krasutskaya, N.S. Thermoelectric Properties of Some Perovskite Oxides. J. Thermoelectr. 2009, 3, 73–80. [Google Scholar]
  70. Klyndyuk, A.I. Thermoelectric Properties of Lauered Ferrocuprates LnBaCuFeO5+δ (Ln = La, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd–Lu). Phys. Solid State 2009, 51, 250–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zeng, C.; Liu, Y.; Lan, J.; Ren, G.; Lin, Y.; Li, M.; Nan, C. Thermoelectric properties of Sm1–xLaxBaCuFeO5 ceramics. Mat. Res. Bull. 2015, 69, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zeng, C.; Zhan, B.; Butt, S.; Liu, Y.; Ren, G.; Lin, Y.-H.; Li, M.; Nan, C.-W. Electrical and Thermal Conduction Behaviors in La-Substituted GdBaCuFeO5+δ Ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 98, 437–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wu, T.; Gao, P. Development of Perovskite-Type Materials for Thermoelectric Application. Materials 2018, 11, 999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Han, B.; Li, Y.; Chen, N.; Deng, D.; Xinxin, X.; Wang, Y. Preparation and Photocatalytic Properties of LnBaCo2O5+δ (Ln = Eu, Gd, and Sm). J. Mat. Sci. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 17–25. [Google Scholar]
  75. Løken, A.; Ricote, S.; Wachowski, S. Thermal and Chemical Expansion in Proton Ceramic Electrolytes and Compatible Electrodes. Crystals 2018, 8, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Galin, M.Z.; Ivanov-Schitz, A.K.; Mazo, G.N. Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Structural and Transport Properties of Solid Solutions of Double Perovskites Based on PrBaCo2O5.5. Crystallography 2020, 65, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tsvetkov, D.S.; Ivanov, I.L.; Malyshkin, D.A.; Sereda, V.V.; Zuev, A.Y. Mechano-Chemical Coupling in Double Perovskites as Energy Related Materials. ECS Transact. 2016, 72, 21–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Klyndyuk, A.I. Thermal and Chemical Expansion of LnBaCuFeO5+δ (Ln = La, Pr, Gd) Ferrocuprates and LaBa0.75Sr0.25CuFeO5+δ Solid Solution. Rus. J. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 52, 1343–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Klyndyuk, A.I. New Perovskite Oxides LaBaMCoO5+δ (M = Fe, Cu): Synthesis, Structure, and Properties. Phys. Solid State 2009, 51, 270–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Klyndyuk, A.I.; Chizhova, E.A. Properties of Perovskite-Like Phases LnBaCuFeO5+δ (Ln = La, Pr). Glass Phys. Chem. 2008, 34, 313–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhu, L.; Wei, B.; Lü, Z.; Feng, J.; Xu, L.; Gao, H.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, X. Performance degradation of double-perovskite PrBaCo2O5+δ oxygen electrode in CO2containing atmospheres. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 416, 649–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Tellez, H.; Druce, J.; Ju, Y.-W.; Kilner, J.; Ushihara, T. Surface chemistry evolution in LnBaCo2O5+δ double perovskites for oxygen electrodes. Int.J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 20856–20863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Perry, N.H.; Ishihara, T. Roles of Bulk and Surface Chemistry in the Oxygen Exchange Kinetics and Related Properties of Mixed Conducting Perovskite Oxide Electrodes. Materials 2016, 9, 858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Sadykov, V.A.; Sadovskaya, E.M.; Eremeev, N.F.; Skriabin, P.I.; Krasnov, A.V.; Bespalko, Y.N.; Pavlova, S.N.; Fedorova, Y.E.; Pikalova, E.Y.; Shlyakhtina, A.V. Oxygen Mobility in the Materials for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells and Catalytic Membranes (Review). Rus. J. Electrochim. 2019, 55, 701–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhang, L.; Chen, G.; Dai, R.; Lv, X.; Yang, D.; Geng, S. A review of the chemical compatibility between oxide electrodes and electrolytes in solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Source 2021, 492, 229630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Liu, J.; Jin, F.; Yang, X.; Niu, B.; Li, Y.; He, T. YBaCo2O5+δ-based double-perovskite cathodes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells with simultaneously improved structural stability and thermal expansion properties. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 297, 344–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Tsvetkov, D.; Tsvetkova, N.; Ivanov, I.; Malyshkin, D.; Sereda, V.; Zuev, A. PrBaCo2O6–δ–Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9 Composite Cathodes for Intermediate-Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: Stability and Cation Interdifffusion. Energies 2019, 12, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Zvonareva, I.; Fu, X.-Z.; Medvedev, D.; Shao, Z. Electrochemistry and energy conversion features of protonic ceramic cells with mixed ionic-electronic electrolytes. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Mao, X.; Ma, G. Performance of cobalt-free double-perovskite NdBaFe2–xMnxO5+δ cathode materials for proton-conducting IT-SOFC. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 637, 286–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wang, Y.; Jin, F.; Hao, X.; Niu, B.; Lyu, P.; He, T. B–site-ordered Co-based double perovskites Sr2Co1–xNbxFeO5+δ as active and stable cathodes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 829, 154470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chang, A.; Skinner, S.J.; Kilner, J.A. Electrical properties of GdBaCo2O5+x for ITSOFC applications. Solid State Ion. 2006, 177, 2009–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Tarancon, A.; Morata, A.; Dezanneau, G.; Skinner, S.J.; Kilner, J.A.; Estradé, S.; Hernández-Ramírez, F.; Peiró, F.; Morante, J.R. GdBaCo2O5+x layered perovskites as an intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cell cathode. J. Power Source 2007, 174, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Zhang, K.; Ge, L.; Ran, R.; Shao, Z.; Liu, S. Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of cation-ordered LnBaCo2O5+δ as materials of oxygen permeation membranes and cathodes of SOFCs. Acta Mater. 2008, 56, 4876–4889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kim, J.-H.; Manthiram, A. LnBaCo2O5+δ Oxides as cathodes for Intermediate-Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2008, 155, B385–B390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhu, C.; Liu, X.; Yi, C.; Yan, D.; Su, W. Electrochemical performance of PrBaCo2O5+δ layered perovskite as an intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cell cathode. J. Power Source 2008, 185, 193–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Gu, H.; Chen, H.; Gao, L.; Zheng, Y.; Zhu, X.; Guo, L. Oxygen reduction mechanism of NdBaCo2O5+δ cathode for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells under cathodicpolarization. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34, 2416–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Liu, Y. YBaCo2O5+δ as a new cathode material for zirconia-based solid oxide fuel cells. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 477, 860–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Jin, M.; Zhang, X.; Qiu, Y.; Sheng, J. Layered PrBaCo2O5+δperovskite as a cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 494, 359–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Pang, S.; Jiang, X.; Li, X.; Su, Z.; Xu, H.; Xu, Q.; Chen, C. Characterization of cation-orderedperovskite oxide LaBaCo2O5+δ as cathode of intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 6836–6843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kim, J.-H.; Manthiram, A. Layered LnBaCo2O5+δPerovskite Cathodes for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: An Overview and Perspective. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 24195–24210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wang, S.; Zan, J.; Qiu, W.; Zheng, D.; Li, F.; Chen, W.; Pei, Q.; Jiang, L. Evaluation of perovskite oxides LnBaCo2O5+δ (Ln = La, Pr, Nd and Sm) as cathode material for IT–SOFC. J. Electroanalyt. Chem. 2021, 886, 115144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Bernuy-Lopez, C.; Rioja-Monnlor, L.; Nakamura, T.; Ricote, S.; O’Hayre, R.; Amezawa, K.; Einarsrud, M.-A.; Grande, T. Effect of Cation Ordering on the Performance and Chemical Stability of Layered Double Perovskite Cathodes. Materials 2018, 11, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Dou, Y.; Xie, Y.; Hao, X.; Xia, T.; Li, Q.; Wang, J.; Huo, L.; Zhao, H. Addressing electrocatalytic activity and stability of LnBaCo2O5+δperovskites for hydrogen evolution reaction by structural and electronic features. Appl. Catal. B Environment. 2021, 297, 120403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Jiang, X.; Shi, Y.; Zhou, W.; Li, X.; Su, Z.; Pang, S.; Jiang, L. Effects of Pr3+-deficiency on structure and properties of PrBaCo2O5+δ cathode material—A comparison with Ba2+-deficiency case. J. Power Source 2014, 272, 371–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Yi, K.; Sun, L.; Li, Q.; Xia, T.; Huo, L.; Zhao, H.; Li, J.; Lü, Z.; Bassat, J.-M.; Rougier, A.; et al. Effect of Nd-deficiency on electrochemical properties of NdBaCo2O6–δ cathode for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 10228–10238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Jiang, X.; Xu, Q.; Shi, Y.; Li, X.; Zhou, W.; Xu, H.; Zhang, Q. Synthesis and properties of Sm3+-deficient Sm1–xBaCo2O5+δperovskite oxides as cathode materials. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 10817–10823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Kim, C.G.; Woo, S.H.; Song, K.E.; Baek, S.-W.; Kang, H.; Choi, W.S.; Kim, J.H. Enhanced Electrochemical Properties of Non-stoichiometric Layered Perovskites, Sm1–xBaCo2O5+d, for IT–SOFC Cathodes. Front. Chem. 2021, 9, 633868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Pang, S.L.; Jiang, X.N.; Li, X.N.; Xu, H.X.; Jiang, L.; Xu, Q.L.; Shi, Y.C.; Zhang, Q.Y. Structure and properties of layered-perovskite LaBa1–xCo2O5+δ (x = 0–0.15) as intermediate-temperature cathode material. J. Power Source 2013, 240, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Pang, S.; Jiang, X.; Li, X.; Wang, Q.; Su, Z. Characterization of Ba-deficient PrBa1–xCo2O5+δ as cathode intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Source 2012, 204, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Wang, J.; Meng, F.; Xia, T.; Shi, Z.; Lian, J.; Xu, C.; Zhao, H.; Bassat, J.-M.; Grenier, J.-C. Superior electrochemical performance and oxygen reduction kinetics of layered perovskite PrBaxCo2O5+δ (x = 0.90–1.0) oxides as cathode materials for intermediate for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 18392–18404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Donazzi, A.; Pelosato, R.; Cordaro, G.; Stucchi, D.; Cristiani, C.; Dotelli, G.; Sopra, I.N. Evaluation of Ba deficient NdBaCo2O5+δ oxide as cathode material for IT-SOFC. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 182, 573–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Pang, S.; Yang, G.; Su, Y.; Xu, J.; Shen, X.; Zhu, M.; Wu, X.; Li, S.; Chen, C. A-site cation deficiency tuned oxygen transport dynamics of perovskite Pr0.5Ba0.25–xCa0.25CoO3–δ for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 14602–14607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Yao, C.; Yang, J.; Zhang, H.; Chen, S.; Lang, X.; Meng, J.; Cai, K. Evaluation of A-site Ba-deficient PrBa0.5–xSr0.5Co2O5+δ (x = 0, 0.4, and 0.08) as cathode material for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 883, 160759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Pang, S.; Wang, W.; Chen, T.; Wang, Y.; Xu, K.; Shen, X.; Xi, X.; Fan, J. The effect of potassium on the properties of PrBa1–xCo2O5+δ (x = 0.00–0.10) cathodes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 13705–13714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Bangwal, A.S.; Jha, P.K.; Chauchan, M.; Singh, S.; Sinha, A.S.K.; Jha, P.A.; Singh, P. Compositional effect on oxygen reduction reaction in Pr excess double perovskite Pr1+xBa1–xCo2O6–δcathode materials. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 23378–23390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Lu, F.; Xia, T.; Li, Q.; Wang, J.; Huo, L.; Zhao, H. Heterostructured simple perovskitenanorod-decorated double perovskite cathode for solid oxide fuel cells: Highly catalytic activity, stability and CO2-durability for oxygen reduction reaction. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 249, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Azad, A.K.; Kim, J.H.; Irvine, J.T.S. Structure–property relationship in layered perovskite cathode LnBa0.5Sr0.5Co2O5+δ (Ln = Pr, Nd) for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Source 2011, 196, 7333–7337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Xia, W.; Liu, X.; Jin, F.; Jia, X.; Shen, Y. Evaluation of calcium codoping in double perovskite PrBaCo2O5+δ as cathode for IT–SOFCs. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 464, 137274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Subardi, A.; Liao, K.-Y.; Fu, Y.-P. Oxygen transport, thermal and electrochemical properties of NdBa0.5Sr0.5Co2O5+δ cathode for SOFCs. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 39, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Yao, C.; Zhang, H.; Liu, X.; Meng, J.; Zhang, X.; Meng, F.; Meng, J. Ivestigation of layered perovskite NdBa0.5Sr0.25Ca0.25Co2O5+δ as cathode for solid oxide fuel cells. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 12048–12054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Yoo, S.; Jun, A.; Ju, Y.-W.; Odkhuu, D.; Hyodo, J.; Jeong, H.Y.; Park, N.; Shin, J.; Ishihara, T.; Kim, G. Development of Double-Perovskite Compoundes as Cathode Materials for Low-Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 13064–13067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Zhang, X.; Jin, M.; Sheng, J. Layered GdBa0.5Sr0.5Co2O5+δ as a cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells with stable BaCe0.5Zr0.3Y0.16Zn0.04O3–δ electrolyte. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 496, 241–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Meng, F.; Xia, T.; Wang, J.; Shi, Z.; Lian, J.; Zhao, H.; Bassat, J.-M.; Grenier, J.-C. Evaluation of layered perovskites YBa1–xSrxCo2O5+δ as cathodes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 4531–4543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Xue, J.; Shen, Y.; He, T. Performance of double-perovskite YBa0.5Sr0.5Co2O5+δ as cathode material for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 6894–6898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Woo, S.H.; Song, K.E.; Baek, S.-W.; Kang, H.; Choi, W.; Shin, T.H.; Park, J.-Y.; Kim, J.H. Pr- and Sm-Substituted Layered Perovskite Oxide Systems for IT–SOFC Cathodes. Energies 2021, 14, 6739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Subardi, A.; Cheng, M.-H.; Fu, Y.-P. Chemical bulk diffusion and electrochemical properties of SmBa0.6Sr0.4Co2O5+δ cathode for intermediate solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 20783–20790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Subardi, A.; Chen, C.-C.; Fu, Y.-P. Oxygen transportation, electrical conductivity and electrochemical properties of layered perovskite SmBa0.5Sr0.5Co2O5+δ. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 5284–5294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Zhang, L.; Li, S.; Xia, T.; Sun, L.; Huo, L.; Zhao, H. Co-deficient PrBaCo2–xO6–δperovskites as cathode materials for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells: Enhanced electrochemical performance and oxygen reduction kinetics. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 3761–3775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Che, X.; Shen, Y.; Li, H.; He, T. Assessment of LnBaCo1.6Ni0.4O5+δ (Ln = Pr, Nd, and Sm)double-perovskites as cathodes for intermediate-temperature solid-oxide fuel cells. J. Power Source 2013, 222, 288–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Liu, L.; Guo, R.; Wang, S.; Yang, Y.; Yin, D. Synthesis and characterization of PrBa0.5Sr0.5Co2–xNixO5+δ (x = 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3) cathodes for intermediate temperature SOFCs. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 16393–16398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Urusova, A.S.; Cherepanov, V.A.; Lebedev, O.I.; Aksenova, T.V.; Gavrilova, L.Y.; Caignaert, V.; Raveau, B. Tuning oxygen content and distribution by substitution at Co site in 112 YBaCo2O5+δ: Impact on transport and thermal properties. Chem. Mater. A 2014, 2, 8823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Liu, B.; Yang, J.; Yan, D.; Jia, L.; Chi, B.; Pu, J.; Li, J. Novel PrBa0.9Ca0.1Co2–xZnxO5+δ double-perovskite as an active cathode materialfor high-performance proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 31009–31016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Jun, A.; Shin, J.; Kim, G. High redox and performance stability of layered SmBa0.5Sr0.5Co1.5Cu0.5O5+δperovskite cathodes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 19906–19912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Zhang, Y.; Yu, B.; Lü, S.; Meng, X.; Zhao, X.; Ji, Y.; Wang, Y.; Fu, C.; Liu, X.; Li, X.; et al. Effect of Cu doping on YBaCo2O5+δ as cathode for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 134, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Klyndyuk, A.I.; Mosiałek, M.; Kharitonov, D.S.; Chizhova, E.A.; Zimowska, M.; Socha, R.; Komenda, A. Structural and electrochemical characterization of YBa(Fe,Co,Cu)2O5+δ layered perovskites as cathode materials for solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 16977–16988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Lu, F.; Xia, T.; Li, Q.; Sun, L.; Huo, L.; Zhao, H. Ta-doped PrBa0.94Co2–xTaxO5+δ as promising oxygen electrodes: A focused study on catalytic oxygen reduction reaction activity, stability and CO2-durability. J. Power Source 2019, 417, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Xu, J.; Cai, H.; Hao, G.; Zhang, L.; Song, Z.; Long, W.; Zhang, L.; Mang, L. Characterization of high-valence Mo-doped PrBaCo2O5+δ cathodes for IT–SOFCs. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 842, 155600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Wang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Lü, S.; Meng, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, B.; Li, X.; Sui, Y.; Yang, J.; Fu, C.; et al. Synthesis and characterization of SmSrCo2–xMnxO5+δ (x = 0.0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0) cathode materials for intermediate-temperature solid-oxide fuel cells. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 11343–11350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Muñoz-Gil, D.; Urones-Garrote, E.; Pérez-Coll, D.; Amador, U.; García-Martin, S. Crystal structure and compositional effectson the electrical and electrochemical properties of GdBaCo2–xMnxO5+δ (0 ≤ x ≤ 2) oxides for use as air electrodes in solid oxide fuel cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 5452–5460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Olszewska, A.; Świerczek, K. ReBaCo2–xMnxO5+δ (Re: Rare earth element) layered perovskites for application as cathodes in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. E3S Web Conf. 2019, 108, 01020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Olszewska, A.; Świerczek, K.; Niemczyk, A. Peculiar Properties of Electrochemically Oxidized SmBaCo2–xMnxO5+δ (x = 0; 0.5 and 1) A-Site Ordered Perovskites. Crystals 2020, 10, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Kim, Y.N.; Kim, J.-H.; Manthiram, A. Effect of fe substitution on the structure and properties of LnBaCo2–xFexO5+δ (Ln = Nd and Gd) cathodes. J. Power Source 2010, 195, 6411–6419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Zhao, L.; Shen, J.; He, B.; Chen, F.; Xia, C. Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of PrBaCo2–xFexO5+δ as cathodes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 3658–3665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Xue, J.; He, T. Double-perovskites YBaCo2–xFexO5+δ cathodes for intermadiate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Source 2011, 196, 3729–3735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Zou, J.; Park, J.; Kwak, B.; Yoon, H.; Chung, J. Effect of Fe doping on PrBaCo2O5+δ as cathode for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Solid State Ion. 2012, 206, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Choi, S.; Shin, J.; Kim, G. The electrochemical and thermodynamic characterization of PrBaCo2–xFexO5+δ (x = 0, 0.5, 1) infiltrated into yttria-stabilized zirconia scaffold as cathodes for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Source 2012, 201, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Jiang, L.; Wei, T.; Zeng, R.; Zhang, W.-X.; Huang, Y.-H. Thermal and electrochemical properties of PrBa0.5Sr0.5Co2–xFexO5+δ (x = 0.5, 1.0, 1.5) cathode materials for solid-oxide fuel cells. J. Power Source 2013, 232, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Yoo, C.-Y.; Joo, J.H.; Lee, H.J.; Yu, J.H. The effects of Fe-substitution on the crystal structure and oxygen permeability of PrBaCo2O5+δ. Mat. Lett. 2013, 108, 65–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Anjum, U.; Vashishta, S.; Sinha, N.; Haider, M.A. Role of oxygen anion diffusion in improved electrochemical performance of layered perovskite LnBa1–ySryCo2–xFexO5+δ (Ln = Pr, Nd, Gd) electrodes. Solid State Ion. 2015, 280, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Strandbakke, R.; Cherepanov, V.A.; Zuev, A.Y.; Tsvetkov, D.S.; Argirusis, C.; Sourkoni, G.; Prüne, S.; Norby, T. Gd- and Pr-based double perovskitecobaltites as oxygen electrodes for proton ceramic fuel cells and electrolyser cells. Solid State Ion. 2015, 278, 120–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Lee, T.-H.; Parl, K.-Y.; Kim, N.-I.; Dong, S.-J.; Hong, K.-H.; Ahn, D.; Azad, A.K.; Hwang, J.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Lee, S.-C.; et al. Robust NdBa0.5Sr0.5Co1.5Fe0.5O5+δ cathode material and its degradation prevention operating logic for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Source 2016, 331, 495–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Anjum, U.; Vashishtha, S.; Agarwal, M.; Tiwari, P.; Sinha, N.; Agrawal, A.; Basu, S.; Haider, M.A. Oxygen anion diffusion in double perovskite GdBaCo2O5+δ and LnBa0.5Sr0.5Co2–xFexO5+δ (Ln = Gd, Pr, Nd) electrodes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 7631–7640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Muñoz-Gil, D.; Pérez-Coll, D.; Urones-Garrote, E.; Amador, U.; Garcia-Martin, S. Influence of the synthesis conditions on the crystal structure and properties of GdBaCo2–xFexO5+δ oxides as air-electrodes for Intermediate Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 12550–12556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Zhang, S.-L.; Chen, K.; Zhang, A.-P.; Li, C.-X.; Li, C.-J. Effect of Fe doping on the performance of suspension plasma-sprayed PrBa0.5Sr0.5Co2–xFexO5+δ cathodes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 11648–11655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Cordaro, G.; Donazzi, A.; Pelosato, R.; Cristiani, C.; Dotelli, G.; Sora, I.N. Electrochemical and Chemical Characterization of NdBa1–xCo2–yFeyO5+δ Cathodes for IT–SOFCs. ECS Transact. 2017, 78, 507–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Kim, B.-J.; Fabbri, E.; Castelli, I.E.; Borlaf, M.; Graule, T.; Nachtegaal, M.; Schmidt, T.J. Fe-Doping in Double Perovskite PrBaCo2(1–x)Fe2xO6–δ: Insights into Structural and Electronic Effects to Enhance Oxygen Evolution Catalyst Stability. Catalysts 2019, 9, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Cordaro, G.; Donazzi, A.; Pelosato, R.; Mastropasqua, L.; Cristiani, C.; Sora, I.N.; Dotelli, G. Structural and Electrochemical Characterization of NdBa1–xCo2–yFeyO5+δ as cathode for Intermediate Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 024502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Lu, C.; Niu, B.; Yi, W.; Ji, Y.; Xu, B. Efficient symmetrical electrodes of PrBaFe2–xCoxO5+δ (x = 0, 0.2, 0.4) for solid oxide fuel cells and solid oxide electrolysis cells. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 358, 136916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Jin, F.; Shen, Y.; Wang, R.; He, T. Double-perovskite PrBaCo2/3Fe2/3Cu2/3O5+δ as cathode material for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Source 2013, 234, 244–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Jin, F.; Li, L.; He, T. NdBaCo2/3Fe2/3Cu2/3O5+δ double perovskites as a novel cathode material for CeO2- and LaGaO3-based solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Source 2015, 273, 591–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Jin, F.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Chu, X.; Xu, M.; Zhai, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Fang, W.; Zou, P.; He, T. Evaluation of Fe and Mn co-doped layered perovskite PrBaCo2/3Fe2/3Mn1/2O5+δ as a novel cathode for intermediate-temperature solid-oxide fuel cell. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 22489–22496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Lee, S.J.; Kim, D.S.; Muralidharan, P.; Jo, S.H.; Kim, D.K. Improved electrochemical performance and thermal compatibility of Fe- and Cu-doped SmBaCo2O5+δ–Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95 composite cathode for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Source 2011, 196, 3095–3098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Li, R.; Wang, D.; Ge, L.; He, S.; Chen, H.; Guo, L. Effect of Bi2O3 on the electrochemical performance of LaBaCo2O5+δ cathode for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 2599–2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Tsvetkov, D.S.; Tsvetkova, N.S.; Ivanov, I.L.; Malyshkin, D.A.; Sereda, V.V.; Zuev, A.Y. PrBaCo2O6–δ–Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9 Composite Cathodes for Intermediate Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel cells. ECS Transact. 2015, 68, 965–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Li, S.; Zhang, L.; Xia, T.; Li, Q.; Sun, L.; Huo, L.; Zhao, H. Synergistic effect study of EuBa0.98Co2O5+δ–Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9 composite cathodes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 771, 513–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Kim, J.-H.; Irvine, J. Characterization of layered perovskite oxides NdBa1−xSrxCo2O5+δ (x = 0 and 0.5) as cathode materials for IT-SOFC. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 5920–5929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Kim, J.-H.; Kim, Y.N.; Bi, Z.; Manthiram, A.; Paranthaman, M.P.; Huq, A. Overcoming phase instability of RBaCo2O5+δ (R = Y and Ho) by Sr substitution for application as cathodes in solid oxide fuel cells. Solid State Ion. 2013, 253, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Idrees, A.; Jiang, X.; Liu, G.; Luo, H.; Zhang, Q.; Jiang, L.; Li, X.; Xu, B. An optimized synthesis route for high performance composite cathode based on a layered perovskite oxide of PrBa0.92Co2O6–δ with cationic deficiency. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 4271–4280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Idrees, A.; Jiang, X.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, Q. Properties of composite cathodes composed of Pr3+-deficient oxide and ionic conductor Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 17532–17539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Rioja-Monnlor, L.; Ricote, S.; Bernuy-Lopez, C.; Grande, T.; O’Hayre, R.; Einarsrud, M.-A. High-Performance La0.5Ba0.5Co1/3Mn1/3Fe1/3O3–δ–BaZr1–zYzO3–δ Cathode Composites via an Exsolution Mechanism for protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells. Inorg. 2018, 6, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Rioja-Monnlor, L.; Bernuy-Lopez, C.; Fontaine, M.-L.; Grande, T.; Einarsrud, M.-A. Microstructural and compositional optimization of La0.5Ba0.5CoO3–δ–BaZr1–zYzO3–δ (z = 0, 0,05 and 0.1) nanocomposite cathodes for protonic ceramic fuel cells. J. Phys. Energy 2020, 2, 015001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Choi, M.-B.; Jeon, S.-Y.; Hwang, H.-J.; Park, J.-Y.; Song, S.-J. Composite of Ce0.8Gd0.2O2–δ and GdBaCo2O5+δ as oxygen separation membranes. Solid State Ion. 2010, 181, 1680–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Chen, T.; Zhao, H.; Xie, Z.; Feng, L.; Lu, X.; Ding, W.; Li, F. Electrical conductivity and oxygen permeability of Ce0.8Sm0.2O2–δ–PrBaCo2O5+δ dual-phase composites. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 5277–5285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Liu, X.; Jin, F.; Sun, N.; Li, J.; Shen, Y.; Wng, F.; Li, J. Nd3+-deficiency double perovskite Nd1–xBaCo2O5+δ and performance optimization as cathode materials for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 33886–33896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Wang, S.-F.; Hsu, Y.-F.; Liao, Y.-L.; Huang, S.-T.; Jasinski, P. High-performance NdSrCo2O5+δ–Ce0.8Gd0.2O2–δ composite cathodes for electrolyte-supported microtubular solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 31778–31787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Zhou, Q.; He, T.; He, Q.; Ji, Y. Electrochemical performances of LaBaCuFeO5+x and LaBaCuCoO5+x as potential cathode materials for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Electrochem. Commun. 2009, 11, 80–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Zhou, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, Y.; He, T. Layered Perovskite GdBaCuCoO5+δ Cathode Material for Intermediate-Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2010, 157, B628–B632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Zhu, Z.; Tao, Z.; Bi, L.; Liu, W. Investigation of SmBaCuCoO5+δ as cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Mat. Res. Bull. 2010, 45, 1771–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Zhao, L.; Nian, Q.; He, B.; Lin, B.; Ding, H.; Wang, S.; Peng, R.; Meng, G.; Liu, X. Novel layered perovskite oxide PrBaCuCoO5+δ ad a potential cathode for intermadiate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Source 2010, 195, 453–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Nian, Q.; Zhao, L.; He, B.; Lin, B.; Peng, R.; Meng, G.; Liu, X. Layered SmBaCuCoO5+δ and SmBaCuFeO5+δperovskite oxides as cathode materials for proton-conducting SOFCs. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 492, 291–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Ling, Y.; Lin, B.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, X.; Yu, J.; Peng, R.; Meng, G.; Liu, X. Layered perovskite LaBaCuMO5+x (M = Fe, Co) cathodes for intermediate-temperature protonic ceramic membrane fuel cells. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 493, 252–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Zhou, Q.; Wei, T.; Guo, S.; Qi, X.; Ruan, R.; Li, Y.; Wu, Y.; Liu, Q. Evaluation of GdBaCuCo0.5Fe0.5O5+δ as cathode material for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Ceram. Int. 2012, 38, 2899–2903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Yang, Z.; Ding, Z.; Xiao, J.; Zhang, H.; Ma, G.; Zhou, Z. A novel cobalt-free layered perovskite-type GdBaFeNiO5+δ cathode material for proton-conducting intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Source 2012, 220, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Jin, F.; Xu, H.; Long, W.; Shen, Y.; He, T. Characterization and evaluation of double perovskites LnBaCoFeO5+δ (Ln = Pr and Nd) as intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cell cathodes. J. Power Source 2013, 243, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Li, L.; Jin, F.; Shen, Y.; He, T. Cobalt-free double perovskite cathode GdBaFeNiO5+δ and electrochemical performance improvement by Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9 impregnation for intermeduate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 182, 682–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Li, R.; Jin, F.; Zhang, Y.; Niu, B.; Liu, J.; He, T. Performance and optimization of perovskite-type La1.4Ca0.6CoMnO5+δ cathode for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 8467–8478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Pang, S.; Su, Y.; Yang, G.; Shen, X.; Zhu, M.; Wu, X.; Li, S.; Yang, X.; Xi, X. Enhanced electrochemical performance of Ca-doped NdBa1–xCaxCoCuO5+δ as cathode materials for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 21902–21907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Lü, S.; Meng, X.; Fu, X.; Liu, M.; Sui, Y.; Chen, Y.; Cao, J.; Sun, Y.; Ji, Y.; Yang, L. The evolution of structure and electrochemical properties of Y-site deficiency Y1–xBaCoCuO5+δ cathode for solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 23227–23236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Costilla-Aquillar, S.U.; Escudero, M.J.; Cienfuegos-Pelaes, R.F.; Aguillar-Martinez, J.A. Double perovskite La1.8Sr0.2CoFeO5+δ as a cathode material for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 862, 158025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Jin, F.; Liu, X.; Chu, X.; Shen, Y.; Li, J. Effect of nonequivalent substitution of Pr3+/4+ with Ca2+ in PrBaCoFeO5+δ as cathodes for IT–SOFC. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 1147–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Hashim, S.S.; Liang, F.; Zhou, W.; Sunarso, J. Cobalt-Free Perovskite Cathodes for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Chem. Electro. Chem. 2019, 6, 3549–3569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Chen, D.; Wang, F.; Shi, H.; Ran, R.; Shao, Z. Systematic evaluation of Co-free LnBaFe2O5+δ (Ln = Lanthanides or Y) oxides towards the application as cathodes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 78, 466–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Li, F.; Tao, Z.; Dai, H.; Xi, X.; Ding, H. A high-performing proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cell with layered perovskite cathode in intermediate temperatures. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 19757–19762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Li, H.; Lü, Z. A highly stable cobalt-free LaBa0.5Sr0.5Fe2O6–δ oxide as a high performance cathode material for solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 19831–19839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Zhang, Y.; Niu, B.; Hao, X.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Jiang, P.; He, T. Layered oxygen-deficient double perovskite GdBaFe2O5+δ as electrode material for symmetrical solid-oxide fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 370, 137807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Li, H.; Lű, Z. High-perfromance fluorine-doped cobalt-free oxide as a potential cathode material for solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 2503–2510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Kim, D.; Son, S.J.; Kim, M.; Park, H.J.; Joo, J.H. PrBaFe2O5+δ promising electrode for redox-stable symmetrical proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 41, 5939–5946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Son, S.J.; Kim, D.; Park, H.J.; Joo, J.H. Investigation of oxygen ion transport and surface exchange properties of PrBaFe2O5+δ. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 41, 2691–2698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Garcia-Garcia, F.J.; Sayagués, M.J.; Gotor, F.J. Novel, Simple and Highly Efficient Route to Obtain PrBaMn2O5+δDouble Perovskite: Mechanochemical Synthesis. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Kudyakova, V.S.; Shalamova, A.M.; Chukin, A.V.; Suntsov, A.Y. Enhanced thermal stability and red-ox activity of PrBaMn2–xFexO6–δ oxides. Mat. Res. Bull. 2021, 140, 111309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Zhu, J.; Zhang, W.; Li, Y.; Yue, W.; Geng, G.; Yu, B. Enhancing CO2 catalytic activation and direct electroreduction on in-situ exsolved Fe/MnOx nanoparticles from (Pr,Ba)2Mn2–yFeyO5+δ layered perovskites for SOEC cathodes. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 268, 118389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Fu, R.; Jiang, P.; Xu, H.; Niu, B.; Jiang, F.; Yang, L.; Feng, T.; He, T. Performance of Pd-impregnated Sr1.9FeNb0.9Mo0.1O6–δ double perovskite as symmetrical electrodes for direct hydrocarbon solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 31394–31405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Zhu, Z.; Zhou, C.; Zhou, W.; Yang, N. Textured Sr2Sc0.1Nb0.1Co1.5Fe0.3O6–2δ Thin Film Cathodes for IT–SOFCs. Materials 2019, 12, 777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  204. Gómez-Pérez, A.; Azcondo, M.T.; Yuste, M.; Pérez-Flores, J.; Bonanos, N.; Porcher, F.; Muñoz-Noval, A.; Hoelzel, M.; García-Alvarado, F.; Amador, U. The A-cation deficient perovskite series La2–xCoTiO6–δ (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.20): New components for potential SOFC composite cathodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 3386–3397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  205. Yue, Z.; Jiang, L.; Ai, N.; Guan, C.; Jiang, S.P.; Sun, X.; Rickard, W.D.A.; Wang, X.; Shao, Y.; Chen, K. Facile co-synthesis and utilization of ultrafine and highly active PrBa0.8Ca0.2Co2O5+δ-Gd0.2Ce0.8O1.9 composite cathodes for solid oxide fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta 2022, 403, 139673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Tolstov, K.Y.; Politov, B.V.; Zhukov, V.P.; Chulkov, E.V.; Kozhevnikov, V.L. The impact of atomic defects on high-temperature stability and electron transport properties in Sr2Mg1−xNixMoO6–δ solid solutions. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 883, 160821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Wu, M.; Li, H.; Ma, S.; Chen, S.; Xiang, W. Boosting the surface oxygen activity for high performance Iron-based perovskite oxide. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 795, 148904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Sednev-Lugovets, A.L.; Sereda, V.V.; Malyshkin, D.A.; Tsvetkov, D.S.; Ivanov, I.L.; Zuev, A.Y.; Maignan, A. Defect chemistry and high-temperature thermodynamics of PrBaCo2O6-δ. J. Chem. Thermodynam. 2021, 161, 106523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Gumeci, C.; Parrondo, J.; Hussain, A.M.; Thompson, D.; Dale, N. Praseodymium based double-perovskite cathode nanofibers for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells (IT-SOFC). Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 71798–71806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Sereda, V.V.; Malyshkin, D.A.; Ivanov, I.L.; Tsvetkov, D.S.; Zuev, A.Y.; Maignan, A. Redox Thermochemistry, Thermodynamics, and Solar Energy Conversion and Storage Capability of Some Double Perovskite Cobaltites. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 18141–18153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Vinoth Kumar, R.; Khandale, A.P. A review on recent progress and selection of cobalt-based cathode materials for low temperature-solid oxide fuel cells. Renew. Sust. Energy 2022, 156, 111985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Crystal structures of perovskite, double perovskite, and Ruddlesden–Popper phase (Reproduced from [40] with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry).
Figure 1. Crystal structures of perovskite, double perovskite, and Ruddlesden–Popper phase (Reproduced from [40] with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry).
Materials 15 00141 g001
Figure 2. Fields of using high-entropy materials for energy conversion and storage purposes (Reproduced from [49] with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry).
Figure 2. Fields of using high-entropy materials for energy conversion and storage purposes (Reproduced from [49] with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry).
Materials 15 00141 g002
Figure 3. Crystal structures of (a) cubic Pm3m single perovskite La0.5Ba0.5CoO3–δ; (b) tetragonal P4/mmm ordered A-site cation and disordered oxygen-vacancy double perovskite LaBaCo2O5+δ; (c) orthorhombic Pmmm both an ordered A-site cation and ordered oxygen-vacancy double perovskite LaBaCo2O5+δ (reproduced with permission from [56]. Copyright 2016, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute).
Figure 3. Crystal structures of (a) cubic Pm3m single perovskite La0.5Ba0.5CoO3–δ; (b) tetragonal P4/mmm ordered A-site cation and disordered oxygen-vacancy double perovskite LaBaCo2O5+δ; (c) orthorhombic Pmmm both an ordered A-site cation and ordered oxygen-vacancy double perovskite LaBaCo2O5+δ (reproduced with permission from [56]. Copyright 2016, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute).
Materials 15 00141 g003
Figure 4. XRD patterns of the samples: YBCCO–SDC, YBCCO –GDC, and YBCCO –LSCM: (a) YBCFC–SDC, YBCFC–GDC, and YBCFC–LSCM (b) calcined at 1123 K for 10 h in air (reproduced with permission from [86]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier).
Figure 4. XRD patterns of the samples: YBCCO–SDC, YBCCO –GDC, and YBCCO –LSCM: (a) YBCFC–SDC, YBCFC–GDC, and YBCFC–LSCM (b) calcined at 1123 K for 10 h in air (reproduced with permission from [86]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier).
Materials 15 00141 g004
Figure 5. Performances of the cell with PrBaCo2O5+δ cathode and (a) oxygen-ion-conducting Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9 electrolyte (reproduced with permission from [69]. Copyright 2008, Elsevier) and (b) proton-conducting BaCe0.5Zr0.3Y0.16Zn0.04O3–δ electrolyte (reproduced with permission from [98]. Copyright 2010, Elsevier).
Figure 5. Performances of the cell with PrBaCo2O5+δ cathode and (a) oxygen-ion-conducting Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9 electrolyte (reproduced with permission from [69]. Copyright 2008, Elsevier) and (b) proton-conducting BaCe0.5Zr0.3Y0.16Zn0.04O3–δ electrolyte (reproduced with permission from [98]. Copyright 2010, Elsevier).
Materials 15 00141 g005
Figure 6. Cross-section view of SEM images of the anode-supported single cell with a Ni–YSZ anode, an YSZ electrolyte, a CGO buffer layer and the (a) A–PBC and (b) SPN–A–PBC cathodes. VI and PI curves of the single cells with the (c) A–PBC and (d) SPN–A–PBC cathodes within 873–973 K. (e) Long-term stability test of a single cell with the SPN–A–PBC cathode at a constant loading voltage of 0.6 V at 973 K for 120 h (reproduced with permission from [116]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier).
Figure 6. Cross-section view of SEM images of the anode-supported single cell with a Ni–YSZ anode, an YSZ electrolyte, a CGO buffer layer and the (a) A–PBC and (b) SPN–A–PBC cathodes. VI and PI curves of the single cells with the (c) A–PBC and (d) SPN–A–PBC cathodes within 873–973 K. (e) Long-term stability test of a single cell with the SPN–A–PBC cathode at a constant loading voltage of 0.6 V at 973 K for 120 h (reproduced with permission from [116]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier).
Materials 15 00141 g006
Figure 7. IV curves and corresponding output power density of (a) NiO–SDC|SDC|NdBa0.5Sr0.5Co2O5+δ–SDC and (b) NiO–SDC|SDC|NdBa0.5Sr0.25Ca0.25Co2O5+δ–SDC single cells at various temperatures (adopted with permission from [120]. Copyright 2018, Elsevier).
Figure 7. IV curves and corresponding output power density of (a) NiO–SDC|SDC|NdBa0.5Sr0.5Co2O5+δ–SDC and (b) NiO–SDC|SDC|NdBa0.5Sr0.25Ca0.25Co2O5+δ–SDC single cells at various temperatures (adopted with permission from [120]. Copyright 2018, Elsevier).
Materials 15 00141 g007
Figure 8. I–V curves and corresponding power densities of test cells with different cathodes (a,c) Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3–δ–Nd0.1Ce0.9O2–δ and (b,d) NdBa0.5Sr0.5Co1.5Fe0.5O5+δ–Nd0.1Ce0.9O2–δ under various cathode air flow rates (a,b) and humidities (c,d). The single cells were operated at 923 K with humidified H2 (3vol.% H2O) as the fuel and ambient air as the oxidant. (a,b) air flow rate change: 50, 100, 150, and 200 sccm. (c,d) air humidity change: dry, 3 vol.%, 5vol.%, and 7vol.% H2O (reproduced with permission from [151]. Copyright 2016, Elsevier).
Figure 8. I–V curves and corresponding power densities of test cells with different cathodes (a,c) Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3–δ–Nd0.1Ce0.9O2–δ and (b,d) NdBa0.5Sr0.5Co1.5Fe0.5O5+δ–Nd0.1Ce0.9O2–δ under various cathode air flow rates (a,b) and humidities (c,d). The single cells were operated at 923 K with humidified H2 (3vol.% H2O) as the fuel and ambient air as the oxidant. (a,b) air flow rate change: 50, 100, 150, and 200 sccm. (c,d) air humidity change: dry, 3 vol.%, 5vol.%, and 7vol.% H2O (reproduced with permission from [151]. Copyright 2016, Elsevier).
Materials 15 00141 g008
Figure 9. (a) Cross-section view of SEM micrograph of the Ni–YSZ|YSZ|CGO|EBCO–20SDC cell. The VI and PI curves of the Ni–YSZ|YSZ|CGO|EBCO–xSDC cells from 873 K to 973 K at (b) x = 0 and (c) x = 20 (adopted with permission from [165]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier).
Figure 9. (a) Cross-section view of SEM micrograph of the Ni–YSZ|YSZ|CGO|EBCO–20SDC cell. The VI and PI curves of the Ni–YSZ|YSZ|CGO|EBCO–xSDC cells from 873 K to 973 K at (b) x = 0 and (c) x = 20 (adopted with permission from [165]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier).
Materials 15 00141 g009
Figure 10. IV and IP curves of NdBa1–xCaxCoCuO5+δ based single cells at (a) x = 0 and (b) x = 0.3 (adopted with permission from [187]. Copyright 2018, Elsevier).
Figure 10. IV and IP curves of NdBa1–xCaxCoCuO5+δ based single cells at (a) x = 0 and (b) x = 0.3 (adopted with permission from [187]. Copyright 2018, Elsevier).
Materials 15 00141 g010
Figure 11. Performance of the single cell with GdBaFe2O5+δ as its symmetrical electrodes for different fuels: (a) H2, (b) humidified syngas, and (c) humidified CH4. (d) Electrochemical stability test of the cell with humidified CH4 as a fuel during a 120 h operation. Inset: Raman spectrum of the anode surface area after stability test (reproduced with permission from [195]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier).
Figure 11. Performance of the single cell with GdBaFe2O5+δ as its symmetrical electrodes for different fuels: (a) H2, (b) humidified syngas, and (c) humidified CH4. (d) Electrochemical stability test of the cell with humidified CH4 as a fuel during a 120 h operation. Inset: Raman spectrum of the anode surface area after stability test (reproduced with permission from [195]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier).
Materials 15 00141 g011
Figure 12. Different strategies of improving the performance of A’A”B2O6–δ layered oxygen deficient double perovskites.
Figure 12. Different strategies of improving the performance of A’A”B2O6–δ layered oxygen deficient double perovskites.
Materials 15 00141 g012
Table 1. TEC values of some layered oxygen-deficient perovskites.
Table 1. TEC values of some layered oxygen-deficient perovskites.
Compound (Space Group)TEC 106, K−1Temperature Interval, KRefs.
NdBaCoFeO5+δ (P4/mmm)16.6300–653[62]
26.5653–1100
SmBaCoFeO5+δ (P4/mmm)13.6300–518[62]
19.3518–1100
GdBaCoFeO5+δ (P4/mmm)12.9300–553[62]
19.9553–1100
SmBaCo2O5+δ (Pmmm)21.2293–1173[63]
SmBaCoCuO5+δ (Pmmm)15.0293–1173[63]
NdBaCo2O5+δ (P4/mmm)19.7293–1173[63]
NdBaCoCuO5+δ (P4/mmm)16.5293–1173[63]
NdBaCo2O5+δ (P4/mmm)18.3300–530[64]
23.8530–1300
NdBaCo1.8Fe0.2O5+δ (P4/mmm)18.8300–530[64]
21.9530–1300
NdBaCo1.6Fe0.4O5+δ (P4/mmm)18.9300–530[64]
21.9530–1300
NdBaCo1.4Fe0.6O5+δ (P4/mmm)18.3300–530[64]
22.1530–1300
NdBaCo1.2Fe0.8O5+δ (P4/mmm)18.4300–530[64]
21.9530–1300
PrBaCo2O6–δ (Pmmm)16.8298–473[66]
21.6473–1273
NdBaCo2O6–δ (Pmmm)16.3298–473[66]
21.6473–1273
NdBaCo2O6–δ (Pm3m)11.9298–473[66]
22.6473–1273
Table 2. CEC values of some layered oxygen-deficient perovskites.
Table 2. CEC values of some layered oxygen-deficient perovskites.
Compound (Space Group)CEC 103DirectionRefs.
NdBaCoFeO5+δ (P4/mmm)11.04in-plane[62]
−17.27out-of-plane
4.59volume
SmBaCoFeO5+δ (P4/mmm)20.72in-plane[62]
−18.00out-of-plane
23.94volume
GdBaCoFeO5+δ (P4/mmm)17.78in-plane[62]
−12.36out-of-plane
25.97volume
LaBaCuFeO5+δ (Pm3m)9.20volume[78]
LaBa0.75Sr0.25CuFeO5+δ (Pm3m)7.55volume[78]
PrBaCuFeO5+δ (P4/mmm)8.72volume[78]
LaBaCoFeO5+δ (Pm3m)17.3volume[79]
LaBaCoCuO5+δ (Pm3m)15.7volume[79]
PrBaCuFeO5+δ (P4/mmm)12.0volume[80]
Table 3. Performance (ASR: area specific resistance, MPD: maximal power density) of SOFCs based on REE–barium layered double cobaltites.
Table 3. Performance (ASR: area specific resistance, MPD: maximal power density) of SOFCs based on REE–barium layered double cobaltites.
CathodeElectrolyteASR, Ω cm2 (T, K)MPD, mW cm−2 (T, K)Refs.
GdBaCo2O5+δCe0.2Gd0.2O2–δ0.534 (918)[91]
GdBaCo2O5+δYSZ0.25 (998)250 (1073)
500 (1073) *
[92]
PrBaCo2O5+δGDC0.23 (873)[93]
LaBaCo2O5+δLSCM516 (1073)[94]
GdBaCo2O5+δLSCM443 (1073)[94]
PrBaCo2O5+δSDC866 (923)[95]
NdBaCo2O5+δSDC0.08 (973)[96]
YBaCo2O5+δYSZ2.03 (1053)[97]
PrBaCo2O5+δBaCe0.5Zr0.3Y0.16Zn0.04O3–δ0.12 (973)361 (973)[98]
LaBaCo2O5+δGd0.1Ce0.9O1.950.0086 (1073)[99]
* With an intermediate porous YSZ layer introduced between the solid electrolyte and the cathode.
Table 4. Performance (ASR: area specific resistance, MPD: maximal power density) of SOFCs based on A-site deficient and A-site substituted REE-barium layered double cobaltites.
Table 4. Performance (ASR: area specific resistance, MPD: maximal power density) of SOFCs based on A-site deficient and A-site substituted REE-barium layered double cobaltites.
CathodeElectrolyteASR, Ω cm2 (T, K)MPD, mW cm−2 (T, K)Refs.
Pr0.95BaCo2O5+δCe0.9Gd0.1O1.950.054 (923)[104]
Nd0.96BaCo2O5+δCe0.9Gd0.1O1.950.043 (973)600 (973)[105]
Sm0.95BaCo2O5+δGDC0.038 (1023)[106]
Sm0.90BaCo2O5+δCe0.9Gd0.1O2–δ0.035 (973)[107]
LaBa0.90Co2O5+δCe0.9Gd0.1O1.950.023 (973)[108]
PrBa0.92Co2O5+δCe0.9Gd0.1O1.950.093 (873)[109]
PrBa0.94Co2O5+δCe0.9Gd0.1O1.950.042 (873)1030 (973)[110]
NdBa0.90Co2O5+δCe0.9Gd0.1O20.1 (973)[111]
Pr0.5Ba0.245Ca0.25CoO3–δCe0.9Gd0.1O1.952080 (1073)[112]
PrBa0.42Sr0.5Co2O5+δLa0.8Sr0.2Ga0.8Mg0.2O3–δ0.082 (1023)[113]
PrBa0.5Sr0.5Co2O5+δCe0.9Gd0.1O2–δ0.286 (873)[117]
Pr0.9Ca0.1Ba0.8Ca0.2Co2O5+δSDC0.069 (973)712 (1073)[118]
NdBa0.5Sr0.5Co2O5+δSDC0.09 (1073)341 (1073)[119]
NdBa0.5Sr0.25Ca0.25Co2O5+δSm0.2Ce0.8O1.90.062 (1073)812 (1073) *[120]
NdBa0.75Ca0.25Co2O5+δGDC0.066 (873)2114 (873)[121]
GdBa0.5Sr0.5Co2O5+δBaCe0.5Zr0.3Y0.16Zn0.04O3–δ0.15 (973)350 (973)[122]
YBa0.5Sr0.5Co2O5+δLa0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.115Co0.085O2.85650 (1073)[123]
YBa0.8Sr0.2Co2O5+δCe0.9Gd0.1O2–δ0.21 (973)[124]
Pr0.5Sm0.5Ba0.5Sr0.5Co2O5+δCe0.9Gd0.1O20.10 (973) [125]
* For the single cell containing the composite NdBa0.5Sr0.25Ca0.25Co2O5+δ–Sm0.2Ce0.8O1.9 cathode.
Table 5. Performance (ASR: area specific resistance, MPD: maximal power density) of SOFCs based on B-site substituted REE–barium layered double cobaltites.
Table 5. Performance (ASR: area specific resistance, MPD: maximal power density) of SOFCs based on B-site substituted REE–barium layered double cobaltites.
CathodeElectrolyteASR, Ω cm2 (T, K)MPD, m Wcm−2 (T, K)Refs.
PrBaCo1.6Ni0.4O5+δCe0.8Sm0.2O1.90.018 (1073)732 (1073)[129]
PrBa0.5Sr0.5Co1.9Ni0.1O5+δYSZ0.297 (1073)120 (1073)[130]
PrBa0.9Ca0.1Co1.85Zn0.15O5+δBZCYYb0.04 (1023) *876 (1023) *[132]
SmBa0.5Sr0.5Co1.5Cu0.5O5+δGDC0.201 (873)1760 (923)[133]
YBaCo1.4Cu0.6O5+δLa0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3–δ0.076 (1023)815 (1123)[134]
YBaCoCuO5+δLa0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3–δ0.138 (973)543 (1073)[86]
PrBa0.94Co1.96Ta0.4O5+δGCO0.020 (973)1050 (973)[136]
PrBaCo1.97Mo0.03O5+δSm0.2Ce0.8O1.90.067 (973)339 (973)[137]
SmSrCo0.8Mn0.2O5+δCe0.9Gd0.1O1.950.078 (973)[138]
GdBaCo1.8Mn0.2O5+δCe0.9Gd0.1O2–δ0.078 (92)[139]
GdBaCo1.5Mn0.5O5+δLSGM0.040 (1123)[140]
PrBaFe2O5+δSm0.2Ce0.8O1.90.18 (973)[143]
YBaCo1.8Fe0.2O5+δLa0.8Sr0.2Ga0.8Mg0.115Co0.085O2.850.13 (973)768 (1073)[145]
PrBaCo1.6Fe0.4O5+δCe0.8Sm0.2O2–γ0.13 (973)446.4 (973)[145]
PrBaCoFeO5+δYSZ720 (973) **[146]
PrBaCo1.5Fe0.5O5+δLa0.8Sr0.2Ga0.83Mg0.17O2.8150.07 (1123)697 (1123)[147]
NdBa0.5Sr0.5Co1.5Fe0.5O5+δNd0.1Ce0.9O2–δ1010 (923) #[151]
GdBaCo1.4Fe0.6O5+δCe0.9Gd0.1O2–δ0.096 (923)[153]
PrBa0.5Sr0.5Co1.8Fe0.2O5+δScSZ0.012 (973)1350 (973)[154]
NdBaCo1.6Fe0.4O5+δGd0.1Ce0.9O20.17 (973)[155]
NdBa0.9Co1.9Fe0.1O5+δCe0.9Gd0.1O2–δ0.14 (973)[157]
PrBaCo0.2Fe1.8O5+δLa0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3735 (1123)[158]
PrBaCo2/3Fe2/3Cu2/3O5+δCe0.9Gd0.1O1.950.038 (1073)659 (1073)[159]
NdBaCo2/3Fe2/3Cu2/3O5+δLa0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3–δ0.023 (1073)719 (1073)[160]
PrBaCo2/3Fe2/3Mn1/2O5+δSm0.2Ce0.8O1.90.028 (1073)588 (1073)[161]
* For the composite PrBa0.9Ca0.1Co1.85Zn0.15O5+δ+BZCYYb (6:4 weight ratio) cathode. ** For the composite PrBaCoFeO5+δ+YSZ. # For the composite NdBa0.5Sr0.5Co1.5Fe0.5O5+δ+Nd0.1Ce0.9O2–δ.
Table 6. Oxygen anion diffusion coefficients and activation energies calculated using molecular dynamics for REE–barium layered double cobaltites.
Table 6. Oxygen anion diffusion coefficients and activation energies calculated using molecular dynamics for REE–barium layered double cobaltites.
Material CompositionDiffusion Coefficient (cm2 s−1)T, KActivation Energy (kJ mol−1)Refs.
PrBaCo2O5+δ3.0·10−887340.5[149]
PrBa0.5Sr0.5Co2O5+δ8.33·10−887328.9[149]
PrBaCo1.5Fe0.5O5+δ8.0·10−887324.12[149]
PrBa0.5Sr0.5CoFeO5+δ5.50·10−887341.6[152]
PrBa0.5Sr0.5Co1.5Fe0.5O5+δ1.18·10−787330.9[149]
GdBa0.5Sr0.5Co2O5+δ4·10−892347.2[152]
GdBa0.5Sr0.5Co1.5Fe0.5O5+δ3.0·10−887334.7[149]
GdBa0.5Sr0.5Co1.5Fe0.5O5+δ5.13·10−892340.6[152]
GdBa0.5Sr0.5CoFeO5+δ7.5·10−892344.9[149]
NdBa0.5Sr0.5Co2O5+δ4·10−887328.7[152]
NdBa0.5Sr0.5Co1.5Fe0.5O5+δ5.16·10−887348.0[149]
NdBa0.5Sr0.5CoFeO5+δ3.8·10−887328.6[152]
Table 7. Performance (ASR: area specific resistance, MPD: maximal power density) of SOFCs based on LnBaMe’Me”O5+δ compounds.
Table 7. Performance (ASR: area specific resistance, MPD: maximal power density) of SOFCs based on LnBaMe’Me”O5+δ compounds.
CathodeElectrolyteASR, Ω cm2 (T, K)MPD, mW cm–2 (T, K)Refs.
LaBaCuFeO5+δCe0.8Sm0.2O1.90.21 (973)557 (1073)[176]
LaBaCuCoO5+δCe0.8Sm0.2O1.90.11 (973)603 (1073)[176]
GdBaCuCoO5+δLa0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3–δ0.091 (1023)545 (1073)[177]
GdBaCuCoO5+δSm0.2Ce0.8O1.90.129 (1023)528 (1073)[177]
SmBaCuCoO5+δBaCe0.7Zr0.1Y0.2O3–δ0.22 (973)355 (973)[178]
PrBaCuCoO5+δSm0.2Ce0.8O1.90.047 (973)791 (973)[179]
LaBaCuFeO5+δBaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.2O3–δ0.27 (973)327 (973)[181]
LaBaCuCoO5+δBaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.2O3–δ0.15 (973)432 (973)[181]
GdBaFeNiO5+δBaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.2O3–δ0.15 (973)456 (973)[183]
PrBaCoFeO5+δLa0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3–δ0.049 (1073)749 (1073)[184]
NdBaCoFeO5+δLa0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3–δ0.062 (1073)669 (1073)[184]
La1.4Ca0.6CoMnO5+δLa0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3–δ445 (1073)[186]
NdBa0.7Ca0.3CoCuO5+δGd0.1Ce0.9O1.950.038 (973)1840 (1073)[187]
Y0.93BaCoCuO5+δLa0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3–δ0.029 (1073)862 (1123)[188]
Pr0.9Ca0.1BaCoFeO5+δLa0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3–δ0.027 (1073)728 (1073)[190]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Klyndyuk, A.I.; Chizhova, E.A.; Kharytonau, D.S.; Medvedev, D.A. Layered Oxygen-Deficient Double Perovskites as Promising Cathode Materials for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Materials 2022, 15, 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010141

AMA Style

Klyndyuk AI, Chizhova EA, Kharytonau DS, Medvedev DA. Layered Oxygen-Deficient Double Perovskites as Promising Cathode Materials for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Materials. 2022; 15(1):141. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010141

Chicago/Turabian Style

Klyndyuk, Andrei I., Ekaterina A. Chizhova, Dzmitry S. Kharytonau, and Dmitry A. Medvedev. 2022. "Layered Oxygen-Deficient Double Perovskites as Promising Cathode Materials for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells" Materials 15, no. 1: 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010141

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop