Biomimetic Octacalcium Phosphate Bone Has Superior Bone Regeneration Ability Compared to Xenogeneic or Synthetic Bone
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Bone Substitute Materials
2.2. Characterization of Bone Substitute Materials
2.3. Animals
2.4. Surgical Procedure
2.5. Bone Sample Preparation
2.6. Histological Observation and Morphometric Analysis
2.7. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Bone Substitute Materials
3.2. Histomorphometric Analysis
3.3. Histological Findings
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Pike, R.L.; Boyne, P.J. Composite autogenous marrow and surface-decalcified implants in mandibular defects. J. Oral Surg. 1973, 31, 905–912. [Google Scholar]
- Miron, R.J.; Hedbom, E.; Saulacic, N.; Zhang, Y.; Sculean, A.; Bosshardt, D.D.; Buser, D. Osteogenic potential of autogenous bone grafts harvested with four different surgical techniques. J. Dent. Res. 2011, 90, 1428–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Soltan, M.; Smiler, D.G.; Gailani, F. A new “platinum” standard for bone grafting: Autogenous stem cells. Implant. Dent. 2005, 14, 322–325. [Google Scholar]
- Sheikh, Z.; Najeeb, S.; Khurshid, Z.; Verma, V.; Rashid, H.; Glogauer, M. Biodegradable Materials for Bone Repair and Tissue Engineering Applications. Materials 2015, 8, 5744–5794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Urist, M.R. Bone: Formation by autoinduction. 1965. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2002, 395, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Vance, R.J.; Miller, D.C.; Thapa, A.; Haberstroh, K.M.; Webster, T.J. Decreased fibroblast cell density on chemically degraded poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid, polyurethane, and polycaprolactone. Biomaterials 2004, 25, 2095–2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, P. Biomimetic nano-apatite coating capable of promoting bone ingrowth. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2003, 66, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Liu, H.; Webster, T.J. Nanomedicine for implants: A review of studies and necessary experimental tools. Biomaterials 2007, 28, 354–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kovaleva, E.S.; Kuznetsov, A.V.; Soin, A.V.; Veresov, A.G.; Putlyaev, V.I.; Tret’yakov, Y.D. Study of materials bioactivity with the use of model media. Dokl. Chem. 2005, 405, 213–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Eliaz, N.; Metoki, N. Calcium Phosphate Bioceramics: A Review of Their History, Structure, Properties, Coating Technologies and Biomedical Applications. Materials 2017, 10, 334. [Google Scholar]
- Saska, S.; Barud, H.S.; Gaspar, A.M.; Marchetto, R.; Ribeiro, S.J.; Messaddeq, Y. Bacterial cellulose-hydroxyapatite nanocomposites for bone regeneration. Int. J. Biomater. 2011, 2011, 175362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bucholz, R.W. Nonallograft osteoconductive bone graft substitutes. Clin. Orthop. Relat. R 2002, 395, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sallent, I.; Capella-Monsonis, H.; Procter, P.; Bozo, I.Y.; Deev, R.V.; Zubov, D.; Vasyliev, R.; Perale, G.; Pertici, G.; Baker, J.; et al. The Few Who Made It: Commercially and Clinically Successful Innovative Bone Grafts. Front. Bioeng. Biotech. 2020, 8, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Sugawa, A.; Fujikawa, K.; Kusama, K.; Takagi, S.; Chow, L.C. Histopathological reactions of pre-mixed calcium phosphate cement pastes. J. Dent. Res. 2002, 81, A191. [Google Scholar]
- Kasai, T.; Ishikawa, K.; Suzuki, K.; Yatani, H. Initial evaluation of a ceramic form as a reconstructive material for bone defects. Dent. Mater. J. 2000, 19, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Bohner, M.; Santoni, B.L.; Dobelin, N. β-tricalcium phosphate for bone substitution: Synthesis and properties. Acta Biomater. 2020, 113, 23–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jarcho, M.; Kay, J.F.; Gumaer, K.I.; Doremus, R.H.; Drobeck, H.P. Tissue, cellular and subcellular events at a bone-ceramic hydroxylapatite interface. J. Bioeng. 1977, 1, 79–92. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, B.S.; Lee, C.K.; Hong, K.S.; Youn, H.J.; Ryu, H.S.; Chung, S.S.; Park, K.W. Osteoconduction at porous hydroxyapatite with various pore configurations. Biomaterials 2000, 21, 1291–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- LeGeros, R.Z. Properties of osteoconductive biomaterials: Calcium phosphates. Clin. Orthop. Relat. R 2002, 395, 81–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Detsch, R.; Hagmeyer, D.; Neumann, M.; Schaefer, S.; Vortkamp, A.; Wuelling, M.; Ziegler, G.; Epple, M. The resorption of nanocrystalline calcium phosphates by osteoclast-like cells. Acta Biomater. 2010, 6, 3223–3233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ogose, A.; Hotta, T.; Kawashima, H.; Kondo, N.; Gu, W.G.; Kamura, T.; Endo, N. Comparison of hydroxyapatite and beta tricalcium phosphate as bone substitutes after excision of bone tumors. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B 2005, 72, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kikawa, T.; Kashimoto, O.; Imaizumi, H.; Kokubun, S.; Suzuki, O. Intramembranous bone tissue response to biodegradable octacalcium phosphate implant. Acta Biomater. 2009, 5, 1756–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, Y.; Cooper, P.R.; Barralet, J.E.; Shelton, R.M. Influence of calcium phosphate crystal assemblies on the proliferation and osteogenic gene expression of rat bone marrow stromal cells. Biomaterials 2007, 28, 1393–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Suzuki, O.; Shiwaku, Y.; Hamai, R. Octacalcium phosphate bone substitute materials: Comparison between properties of biomaterials and other calcium phosphate materials. Dent. Mater. J. 2020, 39, 187–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kamakura, S.; Sasano, Y.; Homma, H.; Suzuki, O.; Kagayama, M.; Motegi, K. Implantation of octacalcium phosphate (OCP) in rat skull defects enhances bone repair. J. Dent. Res. 1999, 78, 1682–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sheikh, Z.; Abdallah, M.N.; Hanafi, A.A.; Misbahuddin, S.; Rashid, H.; Glogauer, M. Mechanisms of in Vivo Degradation and Resorption of Calcium Phosphate Based Biomaterials. Materials 2015, 8, 7913–7925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Suzuki, O.; Nakamura, M.; Miyasaka, Y.; Kagayama, M.; Sakurai, M. Bone formation on synthetic precursors of hydroxyapatite. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 1991, 164, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Imaizumi, H.; Sakurai, M.; Kashimoto, O.; Kikawa, T.; Suzuki, O. Comparative study on osteoconductivity by synthetic octacalcium phosphate and sintered hydroxyapatite in rabbit bone marrow. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2006, 78, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bigi, A.; Bracci, B.; Cuisinier, F.; Elkaim, R.; Fini, M.; Mayer, I.; Mihailescu, I.N.; Socol, G.; Sturba, L.; Torricelli, P. Human osteoblast response to pulsed laser deposited calcium phosphate coatings. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 2381–2389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chow, L.C. Next generation calcium phosphate-based biomaterials. Dent. Mater. J. 2009, 28, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yamada, S.; Heymann, D.; Bouler, J.M.; Daculsi, G. Osteoclastic resorption of calcium phosphate ceramics with different hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate ratios. Biomaterials 1997, 18, 1037–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]






Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kim, J.; Kim, S.; Song, I. Biomimetic Octacalcium Phosphate Bone Has Superior Bone Regeneration Ability Compared to Xenogeneic or Synthetic Bone. Materials 2021, 14, 5300. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14185300
Kim J, Kim S, Song I. Biomimetic Octacalcium Phosphate Bone Has Superior Bone Regeneration Ability Compared to Xenogeneic or Synthetic Bone. Materials. 2021; 14(18):5300. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14185300
Chicago/Turabian StyleKim, Jooseong, Sukyoung Kim, and Inhwan Song. 2021. "Biomimetic Octacalcium Phosphate Bone Has Superior Bone Regeneration Ability Compared to Xenogeneic or Synthetic Bone" Materials 14, no. 18: 5300. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14185300
APA StyleKim, J., Kim, S., & Song, I. (2021). Biomimetic Octacalcium Phosphate Bone Has Superior Bone Regeneration Ability Compared to Xenogeneic or Synthetic Bone. Materials, 14(18), 5300. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14185300

