Next Article in Journal
Accuracy of Three Impression Materials on the Totally Edentulous Maxilla: In Vitro/In Silico Comparative Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of Environmentally Friendly Flame Retardants on the Thermal Stability of Phase Change Polyurethane Foams
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recycled Glass Fiber Composites from Wind Turbine Waste for 3D Printing Feedstock: Effects of Fiber Content and Interface on Mechanical Performance
Article

Thermal Deformation of PA66/Carbon Powder Composite Made with Fused Deposition Modeling

1
School of Information Science and Engineering, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang 110870, China
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(3), 519; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030519
Received: 4 December 2019 / Revised: 19 January 2020 / Accepted: 20 January 2020 / Published: 22 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Polymer Design and Manufacturing)
Polyamide 66 (PA66) is a material with high wear resistance, toughness, and heat resistance. However, low stiffness and thermal deformation during thermal processes define applications in many conditions. Carbon powder efficiently enhances stiffness and reduces thermal deformation, which makes up defects of plastic materials. However, forming a composite with fused deposition modeling (FDM) that accumulates material to a specified location by melting plastic filaments is limited, including fluidity and viscosity to form normally. In this paper, filaments of polyamide 66 (PA66) reinforced with carbon powder were produced. Digimat was used to analyze the composite material properties of different carbon contents and predict the proper carbon content. Then, the material properties were imported to ANSYS software to simulate the thermal deformation of the workpieces during processing. It was verified that adding carbon powder is helpful in decreasing thermal deformation. Comparing experiments and simulations, we found that 20% carbon mass fraction was best, and that thermal deformation was minimal at 240 °C nozzle temperature while hot bed temperature was 90 °C. The optimal ratio of extrusion speed to filling speed was 0.87, and the best aspect ratio was 0.25. View Full-Text
Keywords: CPRP; material modeling; processing parameters; warp; max thermal deformation CPRP; material modeling; processing parameters; warp; max thermal deformation
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, F.; Sun, J.; Xie, H.; Yang, K.; Zhao, X. Thermal Deformation of PA66/Carbon Powder Composite Made with Fused Deposition Modeling. Materials 2020, 13, 519. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030519

AMA Style

Li F, Sun J, Xie H, Yang K, Zhao X. Thermal Deformation of PA66/Carbon Powder Composite Made with Fused Deposition Modeling. Materials. 2020; 13(3):519. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030519

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Fei, Jingyu Sun, Hualong Xie, Kun Yang, and Xiaofei Zhao. 2020. "Thermal Deformation of PA66/Carbon Powder Composite Made with Fused Deposition Modeling" Materials 13, no. 3: 519. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030519

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop