Next Article in Journal
Efficacy of Enamel Derivatives to Improve Keratinized Tissue as Adjunct to Coverage of Gingival Recessions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Analysis of the Functionally Step-Variable Graded Plate Under In-Plane Compression
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Ceramic and Nylon Fiber Content on Composite Silica Sol Slurry Properties and Bending Strength of Investment Casting Shell
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Additives on Stability of Alumina—Waste Alumina Suspension for Slip Casting: Optimization Using Box-Behnken Design
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 12
Issue 17
10.3390/ma12172789
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

TiN-Nanoparticulate-Reinforced ZrO2 for Electrical Discharge Machining

by
Ana Lazar
1,2,*,
Tomaž Kosmač
1,
Janez Zavašnik
1,3,
Anže Abram
1 and
Andraž Kocjan
1
1
Department for Nanostructured Materials, Jožef Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
2
Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
3
Max-Planck-Institut for Iron Research, Max-Planck Straße 1, 40237 Düsseldorf, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(17), 2789; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172789
Submission received: 19 July 2019 / Revised: 26 August 2019 / Accepted: 27 August 2019 / Published: 30 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mechanical Properties and Applications of Advanced Ceramics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study presents a fabrication route for an electrically conductive ZrO2–TiN ceramic nanocomposite with a nanoscale TiN phase occupying ≤30 vol% to improve the mechanical reinforcement of the zirconia matrix, and at the same time provide electrical conductivity to facilitate electro-discharge machining (EDM). The TiN nanoparticles were incorporated into a 3 mol% yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP) powder, either by admixing a TiN nanopowder (MCP) or by using in-situ synthesis (ISS) via the forced hydrolysis of a titanyl sulphate aqueous solution and the direct nitriding of as-synthesized titania nanoparticles, followed by consolidation and rapid sintering in a spark plasma sintering (SPS) system. The initial phase composition and crystal structure of the as-synthesized powders and the sintered samples were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray difraction (XRD). The influence of the different fabrication routes on the microstructural evolution, electrical and mechanical properties, and affinity for EDM were assessed using TEM, focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM, Vickers indentation, electrical conductivity measurements, and profilometry. The MCP synthesis route resulted in finer microstructures that are less prone to microstructural inhomogeneities; however, using the ISS route, it was possible to fabricate electrically conductive Y-TZP nanocomposites containing only 15 vol% of the TiN nanoparticulate phase. Both synthesis routes resulted in an increase of the fracture toughness with an increase of the TiN phase due to the nanoparticulate TiN reinforcement of the Y-TZP ceramic matrix via crack-bridging toughening mechanisms. As both synthesis routes yielded Y-TZP nanocomposites capable of successful EDM machining at a TiN content of ≥30 vol% for the MCP and ≥ 15 vol% TiN for the ISS, a possible mechanism was developed based on the microstructure evolution and grain growth.

1. Introduction

Yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP) is a well-known engineering ceramic and is, due to its high strength, fracture toughness [1], and wear resistance, used in a variety of structural and functional applications, e.g., the machining and forming of metals, engine parts, radio-frequency heating susceptors, metrology components [2], as well as biomedical prosthesis [3] and dental restorations [4]. Owing to its useful mechanical properties, Y-TZP offers a promising ceramic matrix for electrically conductive (EC) composites with complex geometries that can be used for electrodes, sensors, or precision parts in micromechanics and electronic devices. However, in order to achieve the necessary complexity of the sintered, hard Y-TZP ceramics, especially for large production batches, expensive conventional machining with diamond tools is employed.
An alternative that can be used to overcome this problem is to use die sinking electrical discharge machining (EDM) or wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM) processes, if the electrical conductivity of a hard ceramic composite material is sufficient (>1 S·m−1) [5]. EDM is a subtractive manufacturing process for achieving complex shapes that is commonly used for machining hard alloys. EDM is effective in the removal of hard material via intensive thermal erosion, which may affect the surface and mechanical integrity of the material. The surface characteristics and surface properties of alloys can be improved, however, by post-processing steps such as grinding and etching-grinding, or when thick coatings are deposited on the surface to be machined, as was recently shown by Mandal et al. and Prakash et al., respectively [6,7].
The EDM of Y-TZP ceramic composites tends to be even more challenging due to the high electrical resistivity, high hardness, and brittle nature of ceramics. The EDM ability to a large extent depends on the electrical conductivity (EC) of the composite, while the EC of the composite is connected with the intrinsic EC of the phases and especially with the electrically conductive phase (ECP) distribution, aspect ratio, and the type of composite (nano–nano, nano–micro, micro–micro) [8]. Besides introducing EC to the insulating ceramic matrix, ECP in appropriate amounts can also contribute to an increased thermal conductivity, hardness, strength, and toughness [9,10,11]. However, successful fabrication usually requires high sintering temperatures to attain fully dense, electrically conductive Y-TZP ceramic composites, owing to the limited affinity for solid-state sintering and/or the pinning of the grain boundaries of the ECP.
Up to now, several ECP-containing Y-TZP-based composites that can potentially be machined with EDM have been prepared. To provide the necessary EC, the ECP can consist of various different materials; these can be transition-metal nitrides (TiN) [12,13,14,15,16,17], carbides (WC, TiC, ZrC, SiC) [15,18], carbonitrides (TiCN) [15], borides (TiB2) [15,19], or carbon nanofillers, such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [20], graphene [21], or even cellulose nanofibers that transform in-situ during sintering into the 3D network of few layers of graphene [22]. The machinability of Y-TZP-based ceramics with EDM as opposed to that of metals, is strongly related to the various factors determining the ECP-containing bulk, such as the ECP properties and microstructural homogeneity, as was shown by Gommeringer et al. [23]. Lauwers et al. demonstrated that WC and TiC were shown to be the most promising ECP used for making Y-TZP-based ceramics EC and processed with EDM [24].
When dealing with coarse-grained powders or inhomogeneous distributions, the content of the ECP in terms of the intrinsic EC can be up to 50 vol% so as to allow EDM [15]. The large amount of the introduced EC phase, however, can result in inhomogeneities that can negatively affect the mechanical properties and the reliability of the component [16]. One of the possible ways to lower the ECP content while achieving the necessary matrix percolation is to keep the ECP particles in the nanoscale range. However, nanopowders are prone to agglomeration and are difficult to homogeneously disperse in the Y-TZP matrix. Their high surface-to-volume ratio leads to an increased sintering activity, promoting grain growth during the conventional sintering process.
The nanoparticle (NP) agglomeration was shown to be successfully mitigated during in-situ synthesis (ISS) by the precipitation of titania nanoparticles on the host Y-TZP particles, as was shown in the Si3N4–TiN [25] and Al2O3–TiN [11] systems. In this way, TiN can be considered as a promising ECP candidate, even if it was inferior to TiC and WC when the conventional processing of coarse-grained powders were employed [26]. The NP growth (and phase separation) during sintering can be further prevented by using the spark plasma sintering (SPS) technique (also known as pulsed electric current sintering (PECS) or the field-assisted sintering technique (FAST)). SPS takes advantage of the electric field that can induce Joule heating (in the case of electrically conductive materials), increasing the diffusion rate at the grain boundaries and, thus, promoting densification via grain sliding. This means that enhanced densification of the sintered composites, preserving fine, nanoscale microstructures, can be obtained using SPS [27].
Several recent studies demonstrated an ability to prepare uniformly dense, fine-grained microstructures of either Y-TZP [28,29,30] or TiN [31,32,33] by SPS. However, there are only a handful of studies that have investigated the SPS of Y-TZP-TiN nanocomposites [34,35] that lead to dense composites possessing better mechanical and electrical properties than pure Y-TZP ceramics. The enhanced toughness (7.6 MPa·m1/2) and electrical conductivity (0.12 × 10−6 S·m−1) of composites containing 35 vol% TiN, sintered by FAST (1550 °C for 2 min, applying a pressure of 56 MPa), was reported by Vanmeensel et al. [36]. Hu et al. reports on fully dense composites containing nano-inclusions of 10–40 vol% TiN, sintered at 1200 °C, 20 min with an applied pressure of 80 MPa by SPS, resulting in a high electrical conductivity of 2724.4 S·m−1 and a rather modest fracture toughness of 3.44 MPa·m1/2 in the case of composites reinforced with 30 vol% TiN [34]. The hardness was moderately enhanced in the case of a TiN addition in the form of nanoparticles (15.4 GPa at 20 vol% TiN), while a micron-sized TiN reinforcement showed a slight increase in the hardness (13.75 GPa at 35 vol%) [14,34].
In the work presented here, we demonstrate that it is possible to fabricate electrically conductive ZrO2–TiN ceramic nanocomposites, with the TiN phase (≥15 vol%) remaining on the nanoscale, suitable for electro-discharge machining (EDM). The aim was to critically evaluate the mitigation of agglomeration during the composite processing, while the powder precursors, consolidated by SPS, were prepared by facilitating either the heterogeneous precipitation of titania nanoparticles on the surface of Y-TZP powder particles followed by a nitriding step in ammonia (ISS) or by mixing the Y-TZP and commercially available TiN nanopowder (MCP). Finally, the role of different powder-fabrication methods, varying the content of the nano TiN phase in the Y-TZP matrix, on the phase and microstructural evolution, fracture behaviour, electrical properties, and the ability of the as-prepared nanocomposites to be machined with EDM, were investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fabrication of the ZrO2–TiN Composite Powder

2.1.1. Fabrication of the ZrO2–TiN Composite Powder via the Forced Hydrolysis of Titania Nanoparticles (ISS) and the Subsequent Direct Nitriding of the Synthesized Titania Nanoparticles

TiO2 nanoparticles were deposited on the surface of host 3 mol% yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP) particles using the following procedure. Y-TZP powder (TZ-3Y-E, Tosoh, Japan) was dispersed in deionized water to obtain aqueous suspensions containing 10 wt% of solids loading. The suspension was homogenized by attrition milling at 600 rpm for 3 h using 3 mm zirconia balls. After 1 h of milling, citric acid as a dispersant was added to stabilize the zirconia suspension. After the slurry was milled, the aggregate break-up was further promoted with a Sonic vibra cell ultrasonic finger (30% amplitude, 10 s pulse, 5 s pause) for 20 min until full dispersion of the mixture. TiOSO4 (γ = 295 g/L; Cinkarna, Celje, Slovenia) was then added dropwise to the Y-TZP suspension during stirring. The precipitation of TiO(OH)2 was triggered by the dropwise addition of tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide (TMAH; Merck, Hohenbrunn, Germany) until a pH value of 4.7 was attained. The viscosity of the suspension increased, and the precipitates were separated from the mother solution using Buchner funnelling filtration. The filtrate was washed several times with deionized water, and at the end, also with anhydrous ethanol to eliminate the sulphate impurities. The cake was dried at 80 °C for 24 h and subsequently calcined at 600 °C for 1 h to transform the precipitated TiO2 precursor to crystalline TiO2 (anatase) NPs (as reported elsewhere [25]). The nitriding step for the as-modified Y-TZP powder was performed at 1000 °C for 3 h in flowing ammonia (150 mL/h) to transform the TiO2 to TiN.

2.1.2. Fabrication of the ZrO2–TiN Composite Powder via Admixing of Commercial TiN Nanopowder to the Y-TZP Matrix (MCP)

Y-TZP (TZ-3Y-E, Tosoh, Japan) and nanosized TiN (PlasmaChem GmbH, Berlin, Germany) were attrition milled in ethanol at 600 rpm for 3 h using 3 mm zirconia milling balls. According to the supplier’s data, the average particle size of the TiN was 20 ± 5 nm with a specific surface area of 80 m2/g and 40 nm, with an area of 13–19 m2/g for the Y-TZP. After the milling, the suspension was oven-dried at 120 °C for 24 h, followed by sieving through an 80 µm mesh sieve.

2.2. Sintering

The sintering process was carried out with a SPS DC system (DR. SINTER®, model: SPS1050, producer: SPS Syntex Inc., Tokyo, Japan) using a graphite die with a 20 mm inner diameter. The die was surrounded by a porous graphite felt insulation to minimize the radiation heat losses. Then 3 g of composite powder were loaded into the die and sintered at 1300 °C, 5 min with an applied uni-axial pressure of 50 MPa. A heating rate of 100 K/min was used up to 1200 °C, afterwards, the final sintering temperature of 1300 °C was reached in 3 min to prevent overshooting of the set temperature.

2.3. EDM Processing

Ground and polished sintered samples were prepared from machined pieces using a die-sinking electrical discharge machine (IT Electronika 200M-E, Željko Volarič, Bovec, Slovenia) in dielectric oil. For all the machining experiments, a copper electrode of dimensions 5.17 mm × 5.17 mm was used. The EDM was programmed to machine for a time of 10 min. The following parameters were used: voltage 280 V, current 3.3 A, discharge duration 28 μs, and pause duration 80 μs.

2.4. Characterization

The density of the sintered samples was measured using Archimedes’ method of immersing the bulk into deionized water at 25 °C. The theoretical density was calculated using the density of TiN (5.22 g·cm−3) and 3Y-TZP (6.05 g·cm−3).
The XRD spectra of the sintered samples used for the phase composition and the Rietveld analysis for the crystallite size determination of the TiN were examined using an X’Pert PRO MPD X-ray diffractometer (PANalytical, Almelo, Netherlands) with Cu-Kα1 radiation at 45 kV and 40 mA with the following set-up: 2θ from 25° to 75°, step 0.034, time 100 s, with the X’Celerator detector fully opened (2.122°).
The microstructures of the sintered and EDM-ed composites in top-down and cross-section views were analysed with a scanning electron microscope coupled with a focused ion beam (SEM-FIB, Helios Nanolab 650, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Before the analysis, a 0.5 µm-thick layer of platinum film was deposited onto the area of interest, using an ion-beam-assisted gas-injection system at 30 kV and 0.43 nA to preserve the very thin surface and to mitigate the curtaining effect. FIB trenches for the cross-section observation were cut with a Ga-ion beam at 30 kV and 65 nA and finalized by ion polishing at 30 kV and 21 nA. The cross-sections were observed in situ at an angle of 52° using electrons at 5 kV and 80 pA. The chemical compositions of the samples were analysed utilizing an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDXS, X-MaX SDD, Oxford instruments, Abingdon, UK) at 15 kV and 0.8 nA.
The size of the NPs, their crystal structure and morphology were analysed using a transmission electron microscope (TEM; JEM-2010F Jeol, Tokyo, Japan). The fine powders were dispersed in EtOH(abs) and sonicated in an ultrasonic bath, and then transferred to commercially available Cu-supported amorphous carbon grids. The sintered ceramic samples were prepared using a conventional sample preparation procedure combined with mechanical and Ar+-ion thinning [37] and analysed using a S-TEM (2200FS, Jeol) operating at 200 kV and additionally equipped with a large-angle SDD-EDS detector (Jeol).
The Vickers hardness (HV10) was measured using a hardness tester (Innovatest, Nexus 7500, Maastricht, Netherlands) with an indentation load of 98.1 N for 10 s. The fracture toughness, Kifr, based on a crack-length measurement of the radial crack pattern produced by Vickers HV10 indentations, was calculated according to the formula of Niihara et al. [38].
The electrical resistivity of the sintered materials was measured with a DC Multimeter-3457A-testing machine (HP, Palo Alto, CA, USA) using Van der Pauw at room temperature (25 °C) with a direct current. The samples were ground and polished to plan parallel.
The surface roughness of the die sunk surfaces was measured in terms of Ra using a 2D surface profilometer (Talysurf, Series 2, Taylor-Hobson, Leicester, UK), each value being the mean of three runs over a travelled length of 5 mm, spaced 0.1 mm apart.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Fabrication of ZrO2–TiN Composite Nanopowders

ZrO2–TiN composite nanopowders with different nominal starting compositions, containing 7.5, 15 and 30 vol% TiN, were prepared either by in-situ synthesis (ISS) (precipitation by forced hydrolysis) or the mixing of commercial powders (MCPs). In Figure 1, the representative TEM morphologies of ZrO2–TiN powders containing 15 vol% TiN are shown. TiN nanoparticles with an average size of 13 nm reside on the surface of the Y-TZP as a result of a successful precipitation via a forced hydrolysis that was followed by nitriding (Figure 1a); the selected-area electron diffraction pattern (SAEDP, Figure 1 inset) analysis confirmed the presence of a mixture of pure Y-TZP and TiN crystallites with random orientations. In Figure 1b, a TEM micrograph of the composite powder prepared by the mixing of commercial TiN nanopowder together with Y-TZP powder is presented. The average measured TiN particle size was 18 nm, which is in good agreement with the specifications provided by the manufacturer. As the average TiN crystallite size is the main difference between both samples, it is worth mentioning that, in the case of commercial powder, the size distribution of the TiN crystallites is narrow, in the range of 16–20 nm (average 18 nm), while in the case of in-situ precipitation, the size distribution is bimodal, with minor TiN crystallites in the size range 5–10 nm and the majority in the size range 10–15 nm (average 13 nm). As a result, we can expect a much better, homogenous distribution in the case of ISS, while in the case of MCP, the TiN nanoparticles are expected to form distinct agglomerated clusters.

3.2. Sintering and Phase Composition

SPS of the composite powders at 1300 °C for 5 min with an applied uniaxial pressure of 50 MPa resulted in the complete densification of the sintered nanocomposites (>97%), irrespective of the powder-preparation procedure used. For comparison, Hu et al. sintered fully dense Y-TZP nanocomposites containing 10–40 vol% TiN with a mean grain size of 55–91 nm at an even lower SPS temperature, i.e., 1200 °C; however, they used a prolonged dwell time of 20 min and an applied pressure of 80 MPa [34]. In the present study, the relative density of the spark-plasma (SP) sintered composites decreased with an increasing content of TiN (Table 1). However, the bulk densities of the sintered ISS samples, compared to the MCP samples, were slightly lower because of the inhomogeneities present (agglomerated TiN), which is much more pronounced at higher TiN contents.
In Figure 2, the XRD patterns of SP-sintered composites differing in TiN content prepared by ISS and MCP are shown. For comparison, pure Y-TZP SP-sintered under the same conditions is also presented. In all the composites, the 3 mol% yttria-doped tetragonal ZrO2 and the cubic TiN (osbornite) phase were the only crystalline phases present. No monoclinic ZrO2 nor titania residues were observed, which, in the case of ISS composite powder, indicated the complete nitriding process for the precipitated titania NPs, leading to TiN [25]. As expected, the peak intensity of the TiN increased with the increasing content of TiN, regardless of the fabrication route used for the composite powders.
The Rietveld analysis was conducted based on all the patterns and the results are presented in Table 1. The calculated content of TiN in the composites deviated slightly from the targeted amount and was, except for the 7.5 vol% TiN ISS sample, lower than the set values. The calculated average crystallite sizes of the TiN in the SP-sintered samples were increasing with the amount of the TiN phase for the ISS fabrication route, i.e., 55, 70, and 98 nm for the 7.5, 15, and 30 vol% TiN, respectively. However, in the case of MCP, the TiN average crystallite size remained practically unchanged and was around 65 nm. The largest calculated crystallite size agrees well with the much narrower and more intensive (111) peak of TiN, in the case of ISS (Figure 2).

3.3. Microstructural Evolution

The microstructures of the SP-sintered ZrO2–TiN composites with various powder compositions prepared by the ISS (a,c,e) and MCP (b,d,f) fabrication routes are presented in Figure 3; the cross-sections (wells) were prepared by FIB from the bulk.
In the composites containing 7.5 and 15 vol% of TiN, the TiN grains (dark coloured) were homogeneously dispersed in the Y-TZP matrix (bright coloured grains) irrespective of the fabrication route employed. As expected, increasing the content of TiN from 15 to 30 vol% resulted in an obvious increase in the TiN dark-coloured grains that were, in the case of MCP (Figure 3f), still several relatively homogeneously distributed in the microstructure that also contained distinct agglomerates of several grains in contact. It seemed that the size of the TiN grains remained similar, irrespective of the TiN content in the case of MCP, which corroborated well with the calculated crystallite size (Table 1). On the other hand, in the case of ISS, increasing the TiN content from 15 to 30 vol% did not result in a systematic increase on the micro-scale, as observed in Figure 3d,f which exhibited similar microstructures (Figure 3c,e). However, there were regions containing extensive amounts of segregated TiN grains, forming a channel-like agglomeration (inset of Figure 3e), which could be ascribed to the homogeneous instead of heterogeneous type of precipitation of the titania nanoparticle precursor in the titanyl sulphate aqueous solution with a higher TiOSO4 concentration and/or agglomeration/flocculation of the ZrO2 particles, resulting in an inhomogeneous TiN distribution in the composite powder. In contrast to the MCP, the grain size in the SP-sintered ISS-prepared composites (Figure 3a,c,e) was gradually increased, as was also the case for the calculated crystallite sizes (Table 1). The latter could be ascribed to the higher reactivity of the TiN particles prepared by ISS (forced hydrolysis), owing to the higher surface energy and/or the amorphous phase that might have provoked rotation and ordered coalescing during the rapid sintering in the SPS equipment. Similar coalescence processes were already observed in the case of the pure Y-TZP [39] and ZrO2–TiN (>30 vol%) systems. Hu et al. speculated that the reason lies in the high volume fraction of TiN or the difficulty in achieving a complete particle deagglomeration by ball milling [34].
The TEM investigation of the ZrO2–TiN sintered MCP composites revealed large TiN grains accompanied by numerous, up to 10 nm-sized, TiN particles that are concentrated on the grain boundaries. In the case of ISS, the TiN phase is continuously distributed at grain boundaries, also forming distinct concentrated clusters, as seen in the Figure 4a) series, while in the case of MCP, the TiN phase has a strong bimodal size distribution, consisting of large, well-defined grains, mainly on the triple-junction grain boundaries, accompanied by nano-sized TiN particles scattered on the low-index grain boundaries. EDS mapping in the High-Angle Annular Dark-Field Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (HAADF-STEM) was used to reveal the spatial distribution of both clearly separated phases, positioned preferentially on the grain boundaries (in Figure 4, Ti K-lines were used as a marker for the TiN phase and the Zr L-line family was used as a marker for the Y-TZP phase). The obtained results are additional support for the relative-density calculations presented in Table 1, where MCP shows a generally denser microstructure, mainly related to the absence of TiN agglomeration (as seen in ISS) and the relatively dense distribution of nano-sized TiN grains on the grain boundaries (GBs). Normally, such positioning on the GBs is undesirable, as it can decrease the mechanical properties of the material, but in our case, it can significantly improve the electric conductivity. As SPS utilizes Joule heating provided by an electric current via the conductive lining and through the sample, the conductivity provided by the TiN NPs is an important factor, even at the SPS synthesis stage, as the TiN NPs can serve as local hot spots.

3.4. Mechanical Properties

The SP-sintered ZrO2–TiN nanocomposites prepared by both routes were tested for Vickers hardness and fracture toughness, and the results are presented in Figure 5.
It was observed that all the composites had slightly higher hardness values compared to the SP-sintered pure 3Y-TZP sample (14.1 GPa), varying between 14 and 16 GPa, on account of the fine microstructures produced by the SPS, as well as the presence of TiN nanoparticles at the grain boundaries of the Y-TZP acting as pinning agents that prevent grain growth. The differences in the hardness for the samples with a larger amount of TiN, however, were statistically insignificant.
Figure 5 (orange lines) shows a plot of indentation toughness as a function of TiN content. All the sintered composites, regardless of the preparation route, had higher toughness values than the pure 3Y-TZP (4.4 MPa·m1/2). Similar to the hardness values, the Kifr values, the differences with respect to the samples with a larger amount of TiN, however, were statistically insignificant, with the highest values reaching 5.2 MPa·m1/2. Vleugels et al. reported even higher fracture–toughness values for similar composites, but they were using a mixture of the monoclinic and tetragonal (3Y-TZP) forms of ZrO2, resulting in a lower net yttrium (2.8 mol%) content that facilitates a tougher Y-TZP matrix (8.2 MPa·m1/2) [15].
The increase in the toughness can be attributed to the addition of nano-sized TiN particles into the Y-TZP matrix acting as inclusions and provoking bridging mechanisms when the crack is being propagated (or arrested during indentation). In Figure 6, all three bridging toughening mechanisms are visible, i.e., crack deflection, crack bridging, and crack branching were observed in the end part of the crack that propagated from the indent.
A generally slightly higher indentation toughness observed in the case of the MCP fabricated nanocomposites, especially for the 7.5 and 30 vol% TiN additions, (Figure 5), could be ascribed to the more homogeneous microstructures obtained, as well as to the smaller average TiN crystallite sizes (Table 1) acting as inclusions to more effectively pin the grain boundaries, besides interacting with the propagating crack (Figure 6). In Figure 7, the fractured surfaces of the SP-sintered samples containing 30 vol% TiN prepared by both fabrication procedures are shown. Indeed, the more efficient grain-boundary pinning in the MCP sample can be assumed from the fact that the fractured surface of the ISS sample exhibits predominantly intergranular fractures and slightly smaller Y-TZP grains, as compared to the MCP sample, where there is a substantial amount of transgranular fracture. Larger Y-TZP grains are known to exhibit a higher stress-induced tetragonal-to-monoclinic toughening [40]. The same observations relating to MCP-prepared composites were already reported by other authors [34,35,41].

3.5. Electrical Properties and Electro-Discharge Machining

The size, shape, and homogeneous distribution of the ECP in the insulating matrix, ECP-matrix interactions, and processing technique are key factors in defining the percolation concentration [8]. In the present study, the nanocomposites prepared by both fabrication routes exhibited relatively homogeneously distributed TiN particulates ECP (Figure 3) and, thus, it was expected that the SP-sintered composites containing nano-sized TiN grains, especially those prepared by ISS synthesis [11,42], will exhibit a higher EC at lower contents of TiN phase compared with the composites containing micron-sized inclusions of TiN phase [14,15,16,17]. The results of the EC measurements are presented in Table 2. The amount of 7.5 vol% TiN phase in the Y-TZP matrix, even if in a nanoscale particulate form, was still insufficient to achieve percolation. Increasing the TiN content to 15 vol% (~13 vol% calculated; Table 2) turned out to be a threshold value for achieving percolation of the SP-sintered ZrO2–TiN nanocomposites, since the ISS fabrication route was just above percolation, while the MCP was still below. A further increase of the TiN to 30 vol%, corresponding to the calculated values of 21.6 and 24.1 vol% for ISS and MCP, respectively, provided a very large EC (Table 2). The EC of 30ISS was more than two times higher than the 30MCP. This could be the consequence of the formed continuous TiN phase, which provides a conductive path in the ISS composites (Figure 3e and Figure 4a2). A similar dependence of the preparation method on EC was reported by Gao et al., who investigated TiN–Al2O3 nanocomposites [42].
The onset of percolation achieved at about 15 vol% of the conductive phase was in line with the work of Gao et al. and Li et al., who investigated TiN–Al2O3 nanocomposites prepared by in situ coprecipitation and the precipitation method of a TiO2–αAl2O3 precursor, further nitriding in ammonia gas to obtain TiN–Al2O3 and consolidation by hot pressing for 60 min at 1400–1650 °C with a pressure of 30 MPa under a N2 atmosphere. The TiN and α-Al2O3 particle sizes are comparable with the results reported here, i.e., between 40 and 50 nm and approximately 300 nm, respectively [11,42].
In accordance with the literature [5], composites that attained a conductivity of at least 0.01 S∙cm−1 could be machined with EDM. Nevertheless, the surface quality of the machined composites varies a great deal with the EC and machining parameters [26]. The results of the investigated machined composites in terms of the material–removal rates and surface roughness are presented in Table 2, while the microstructures of the EDM-machined surfaces are represented in Figure 8. The surface roughness of the machined composites are comparable with those machined with standard EDM parameters (8 A, duty factor 11%, pulse duration 1.6 µs). The achieved surface finishes in the range 2–4 µm and the rather modest material–removal rate was acceptable in terms of the mild machining parameters. Applying more severe EDM parameters could result in higher volumetric material–removal rates as in the case of Put et al. and Pitman [26,43]. The machinability in terms of the material–removal rate, although modest, was better in the case of the ISS-fabricated composites, given their much more pronounced EC (Table 2).
The surface microstructures after the EDM process were, as expected, similar for both fabrication routes, as were the measured roughnesses (Table 2). The typical microstructure of the EDM-machined surface and the subsurface of the 30ISS composite is presented in Figure 8. The edge of the pit was sharp (not shown), while the bottom surface exhibited an orange-peel-like surface finish, interlaced with propagating surface cracks (Figure 8a), which was indicative of the intense melting and re-solidification processes of the material during the subtractive EDM process. In the higher-magnification images (Figure 8c), spherical precipitates and pore channels, where the material was possibly drained out from the bulk, are visible. Nevertheless, the (sub)surface layer was relatively coherent with no delamination or phase segregation. Surface cracks were, however, propagating into the vicinity of the near subsurface, but were oriented parallel to the EDM surface (Figure 8b). In the inset of Figure 8b, the results of the EDS mapping, besides showing a homogeneously dispersed TiN phase (Ti in red) within the ISS sample, also confirmed the presence of the channel-like agglomeration of TiN phase composed of TiN nanoparticles (also observed in the inset of Figure 3e, Figure 4a1,a2 and Figure 7a) being positioned perpendicular to the disk surface. The latter might be the reason for the substantial increase in the electrical conductivity of the ISS samples compared to the MCP samples that contained ≥15 vol% of TiN phase, which was obviously high enough to achieve the EC required for EDM.

4. Conclusions

We have demonstrated that it is possible to fabricate mechanically reinforced and electrically conductive ZrO2–TiN ceramic nanocomposites with the TiN phase (≤30 vol%) remaining on the nanoscale that are suitable for electro-discharge machining (EDM), either admixing a commercially available TiN nanopowder (MCP) or by using an in situ forced hydrolysis of titanium oxysulphate solution and the direct nitriding of synthesized titania nanoparticles (ISS). The following conclusions can be drawn:
  • For both syntheses approaches, the full densification, using a spark plasma sintering (SPS) system, was achieved at 1300 °C and 50 MPa for 5 min.
  • Using the MCP route led to slightly coarser microstructures, being less prone to microstructural inhomogeneities, leading to an increase in the indentation toughness due to the nanoparticulate TiN reinforcement of the Y-TZP ceramic matrix because of the crack-bridging toughening mechanisms.
  • Using the ISS route, it was possible to fabricate electrically conductive Y-TZP nanocomposites containing only 15 vol% of the TiN nanoparticulate phase, presumably due to the formation/presence of the channel-like agglomeration of the TiN phase.
  • Both routes yielded Y-TZP nanocomposites that were successfully machined by EDM when the TiN content was 15 and 30 vol% in the case of ISS and MCP, respectively.

Author Contributions

T.K. conceived the study, J.Z. did the S/TEM analysis and interpretation of results, A.A. did the SEM-FIB of EDM-machined composites, A.L. conducted all the experiments and measurements, data collection and analysis, A.L. and A.K. wrote the manuscript.

Funding

This research and the APC was funded by Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS), through Research Programmes PR-05027 and P2-0087.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Joško Valentinčič, Izidor Sabotin and Pavel Drešar from the Laboratory for Alternative Technologies, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ljubljana for assistance with the EDM process, Miha Čekada (Department for thin films and surfaces, JSI) for the profilometry and David Fabijan (Advanced Materials Department, JSI) for the electrical conductivity measurements. A.L. is thankful to Kristoffer Krnel for early guidance and mentorship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chevalier, J.; Gremillard, L.; Virkar, A.V.; Clarke, D.R. The tetragonal-monoclinic transformation in zirconia: Lessons learned and future trends. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 92, 1901–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Thakare, V. Progress in Synthesis and Applications of Zirconia. Int. J. Eng. Res. Dev. 2012, 5, 25–28. [Google Scholar]
  3. Moritz, J.; Abram, A.; Čekada, M.; Gabor, U.; Garvas, M.; Zdovc, I.; Dakskobler, A.; Cotič, J.; Ivičak-Kocjan, K.; Kocjan, A. Nanoroughening of sandblasted 3Y-TZP surface by alumina coating deposition for improved osseointegration and bacteria reduction. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 39, 4347–4357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kosmač, T.; Kocjan, A. Ageing of dental zirconia ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2012, 32, 2613–2622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. König, W.; Dauw, D.F.; Levy, G.; Panten, U. EDM-Future Steps towards the Machining of Ceramics. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 1988, 37, 623–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mandal, A.; Dixit, A.R.; Chattopadhyaya, S.; Paramanik, A.; Hloch, S.; Królczyk, G. Improvement of surface integrity of Nimonic C 263 super alloy produced by WEDM through various post-processing techniques. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 93, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Prakash, C.; Singh, S.; Pruncu, C.I.; Mishra, V.; Królczyk, G.; Pimenov, D.Y.; Pramanik, A. Surface modification of Ti-6Al-4V alloy by electrical discharge coating process using partially sintered Ti-Nb electrode. Materials (Basel) 2019, 12, 1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lux, F. Models Proposed to explain the Electrical-Conductivity of Mixtures Made of Conductive and Insulating Materials. J. Mater. Sci. 1993, 28, 285–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Demuynck, M.; Erauw, J.-P.; Van Der Biest, O.; Delannay, F.; Cambier, F. Influence of conductive secondary phase on thermal gradients development during Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS) of ceramic composites. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 17990–17996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ran, S.; Gao, L. Electrical properties and microstructural evolution of ZrO2–Al2O3–TiN nanocomposites prepared by spark plasma sintering. Ceram. Int. 2012, 38, 4923–4928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, J.; Gao, L.; Guo, J. Mechanical properties and electrical conductivity of TiN–Al2O3 nanocomposites. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2003, 23, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vanmeensel, K.; Laptev, A.; Van der Biest, O.; Vleugels, J. Field assisted sintering of electro-conductive ZrO2-based composites. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2007, 27, 979–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ran, S.; Gao, L. Mechanical properties and microstructure of TiN/TZP nanocomposites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2007, 447, 83–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Salehi, S.; Van Der Biest, O.; Vleugels, J. Electrically conductive ZrO2-TiN composites. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2006, 26, 3173–3179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vleugels, J.; Van der Biest, O. Development and Characterization of Y2O3-Stabilized ZrO2 (Y-TZP) Composites with TiB2, TiN, TiC, and TiC0.5N0.5. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1999, 82, 2717–2720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Khosravifar, M.; Mirkazemi, S.M.; Taheri, M.; Golestanifard, F. Effect of TiN Addition on 3Y-TZP Ceramics with Emphasis on Making EDM-Able Bodies. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2017, 27, 2404–2413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chiou, S.-Y.; Wang, C.-F.; Ou, S.-F.; Ou, K.-L.; Tsai, Z.-T. Development of electrically conductive zirconia Part1: The optimal process parameters and mechanical properties. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 5705–5712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jiang, D.; Van der Biest, O.; Vleugels, J. ZrO2-WC nanocomposites with superior properties. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2007, 27, 1247–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Basu, B.; Vleugels, J.; Van der Biest, O. Processing and mechanical properties of ZrO2-TiB2 composites. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2005, 25, 3629–3637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Malek, O.; González-Julián, J.; Vleugels, J.; Vanderauwera, W.; Lauwers, B.; Belmonte, M. Carbon nanofillers for machining insulating ceramics. Mater. Today 2011, 14, 496–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Obradović, N.; Kern, F. Properties of 3Y-TZP zirconia ceramics with graphene addition obtained by spark plasma sintering. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 16931–16936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kocjan, A.; Schmidt, R.; Lazar, A.; Prado-Gonjal, J.; Kovač, J.; Logar, M.; Mompean, F.J.; Garcia-Hernandez, M.; Ruiz-Hitzky, E.; Wicklein, B. In situ generation of 3D graphene-like networks from cellulose nanofibres in sintered ceramics. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 10488–10497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gommeringer, A.; Schmitt-radloff, U.; Ninz, P.; Kern, F.; Klocke, F.; Schneider, S.; Holsten, M.; Klink, A. ED-machinable ceramics with oxide matrix: Influence of particle size and volume fraction of the electrical conductive phase on the mechanical and electrical properties and the EDM characteristics. Procedia CIRP 2018, 68, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lauwers, B.; Brans, K.; Liu, W.; Vleugels, J.; Salehi, S.; Vanmeensel, K. CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology Influence of the type and grain size of the electro-conductive phase on the Wire-EDM performance of ZrO2 ceramic composites. CIRP Ann. 2008, 57, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Maglica, A. Innovative Electroconductive Ceramic Composites Based on Si3N4. Ph.D. Thesis, Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  26. Put, S.; Vleugels, J.; Van Der Biest, O.; Trueman, C.S.; Huddleston, J. Die sink electrodischarge machining of zirconia based composites. Br. Ceram. Trans. 2001, 100, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chaim, R. Densification mechanisms in spark plasma sintering of nanocrystalline ceramics. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2007, 443, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, W.; Gao, L. Rapid sintering of nanocrystalline ZrO2(3Y) by spark plasma sintering. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2000, 20, 2441–2445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, C.; Xiang, M.; Fu, Z.; Shen, Z.; Xiong, Y. Microstructural refinement in spark plasma sintering 3Y-TZP nanoceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2016, 36, 2565–2571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bernard-Granger, G.; Addad, A.; Fantozzi, G.; Bonnefont, G.; Guizard, C.; Vernat, D. Spark plasma sintering of a commercially available granulated zirconia powder: Comparison with hot-pressing. Acta Mater. 2010, 58, 3390–3399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Groza, J.R.; Curtis, J.D.; Krämer, M. Field-Assisted Sintering of Nanocrystalline Titanium Nitride. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2000, 83, 1281–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, L.; Jiang, W.; Chen, L.; Yang, M.; Zhu, H. Consolidation of nano-sized TiN powders by spark plasma sintering. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2006, 89, 2364–2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kolesnichenko, V.G.; Popov, V.P.; Zgalat-Lozinskii, O.B.; Klochkov, L.A.; Lobunets, T.F.; Raichenko, A.I.; Ragulya, A.V. Field assisted sintering of nanocrystalline titanium nitride powder. Powder Metall. Met. Ceram. 2011, 50, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hu, C.-F.; Kim, B.-N.; Park, Y.-J.; Estili, M.; Grasso, S.; Morita, K.; Yoshida, H.; Nishimura, T.; Guo, S.-Q.; Sakka, Y. Nano ZrO2–TiN composites with high strength and conductivity. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 2015, 123, 86–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pristinskiy, Y.; Solis Pinargote, N.W.; Smirnov, A. Spark plasma and conventional sintering of ZrO2-TiN composites: A comparative study on the microstructure and mechanical properties. MATEC Web Conf. 2018, 224, 1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vanmeensel, K.; Laptev, A.; Van der Biest, O.; Vleugels, J. The influence of percolation during pulsed electric current sintering of ZrO2-TiN powder compacts with varying TiN content. Acta Mater. 2007, 55, 1801–1811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Šestan, A.; Jenuš, P.; Krmpotič, S.N.; Zavašnik, J.; Čeh, M. The role of tungsten phases formation during tungsten metal powder consolidation by FAST: Implications for high-temperature applications. Mater. Charact. 2018, 138, 308–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Niihara, K.; Morena, R.; Hasselman, D.P.H. Evaluation of Klc of brittle solids by the indentation method with low crack-to-indent ratios. J. Mater. Sci. 1982, 1, 13–16. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kocjan, A.; Logar, M.; Shen, Z. The agglomeration, coalescence and sliding of nanoparticles, leading to the rapid sintering of zirconia nanoceramics. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2541–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Basu, B. Toughening of yttria-stabilised tetragonal zirconia ceramics. Int. Mater. Rev. 2005, 50, 239–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hu, C.-F.; Kim, B.-N.; Park, Y.-J.; Morita, K.; Yoshida, H.; Grasso, S.; Zhang, H.-B.; Guo, S.-Q.; Sakka, Y. Microstructure and mechanical properties of nano ZrO2-10 vol.% TiN composite fabricated by spark plasma sintering. J. Ceram. Process. Res. 2015, 16, 281–286. [Google Scholar]
  42. Gao, L.; Jin, X.; Li, J.; Sun, J. The influence of the preparation method on the microstructure and properties of Al2O3/TiN nanocomposites. Int. J. Met. Res. 2006, 97, 663–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pitman, A.; Huddleston, J. Electrical discharge machining of ZrO2/TiN particulate composite. Br. Ceram. Trans. 2000, 99, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 12 02789 g001 550
Figure 1. TEM micrographs of (a) TiN-coated Y-TZP powder particles (15ISS) and (b) admixing of commercial TiN nanopowder with Y-TZP (15MCP). In both cases, the SAEDP (inset; exp = experimental pattern, rot avr = rotational average of experimental pattern, YZrO, and TiN are calculated simulations) corresponds to a mixture of pure tetragonal YZrO and cubic TiN, without intermediates.
Figure 1. TEM micrographs of (a) TiN-coated Y-TZP powder particles (15ISS) and (b) admixing of commercial TiN nanopowder with Y-TZP (15MCP). In both cases, the SAEDP (inset; exp = experimental pattern, rot avr = rotational average of experimental pattern, YZrO, and TiN are calculated simulations) corresponds to a mixture of pure tetragonal YZrO and cubic TiN, without intermediates.
Materials 12 02789 g001
Materials 12 02789 g002 550
Figure 2. XRD patterns of SP-sintered nanocomposites for various powder compositions prepared by ISS (green) and MCP (purple) fabrication routes.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of SP-sintered nanocomposites for various powder compositions prepared by ISS (green) and MCP (purple) fabrication routes.
Materials 12 02789 g002
Materials 12 02789 g003 550
Figure 3. Back-scattered SEM micrographs of SP-sintered samples for various powder compositions prepared by the ISS (a,c,e) and MCP (b,d,f) fabrication routes.
Figure 3. Back-scattered SEM micrographs of SP-sintered samples for various powder compositions prepared by the ISS (a,c,e) and MCP (b,d,f) fabrication routes.
Materials 12 02789 g003
Materials 12 02789 g004 550
Figure 4. HAADF-STEM micrographs of sintered (a,a1) ISS and (b,b1) MCP ZrO2–TiN ceramic, with corresponding EDS overlay maps (a2,b2) of Zr L and Ti K, interpreted as Y-TZP and TiN, respectively.
Figure 4. HAADF-STEM micrographs of sintered (a,a1) ISS and (b,b1) MCP ZrO2–TiN ceramic, with corresponding EDS overlay maps (a2,b2) of Zr L and Ti K, interpreted as Y-TZP and TiN, respectively.
Materials 12 02789 g004
Materials 12 02789 g005 550
Figure 5. Indentation toughness and Vickers hardness as a function of the TiN content of the SP-sintered (1300 °C, 5 min, 50 MPa) composites fabricated by the ISS and MCP routes.
Figure 5. Indentation toughness and Vickers hardness as a function of the TiN content of the SP-sintered (1300 °C, 5 min, 50 MPa) composites fabricated by the ISS and MCP routes.
Materials 12 02789 g005
Materials 12 02789 g006 550
Figure 6. SEM micrograph showing an arrested crack propagated from the Vickers indent. Circles, squares, and arrows indicate the crack branching, crack bridging, and crack deflection, respectively.
Figure 6. SEM micrograph showing an arrested crack propagated from the Vickers indent. Circles, squares, and arrows indicate the crack branching, crack bridging, and crack deflection, respectively.
Materials 12 02789 g006
Materials 12 02789 g007 550
Figure 7. SEM micrographs of fracture cross-sections for ZrO2-30TiN nanocomposites (a) ISS, (b) MCP.
Figure 7. SEM micrographs of fracture cross-sections for ZrO2-30TiN nanocomposites (a) ISS, (b) MCP.
Materials 12 02789 g007
Materials 12 02789 g008 550
Figure 8. Back-scattered SEM micrographs of EDM-machined 30 vol% TiN–ZrO2_ISS (a) surfaces (b) surface at higher magnification indicating the material–removal mechanisms, and (c) subsurface with an inset of the EDS of the area containing the TiN agglomerate.
Figure 8. Back-scattered SEM micrographs of EDM-machined 30 vol% TiN–ZrO2_ISS (a) surfaces (b) surface at higher magnification indicating the material–removal mechanisms, and (c) subsurface with an inset of the EDS of the area containing the TiN agglomerate.
Materials 12 02789 g008
Table
Table 1. Relative density and TiN crystal size as a function of composition, as determined by the Rietveld analysis.
Table 1. Relative density and TiN crystal size as a function of composition, as determined by the Rietveld analysis.
Composition (vol%)Relative Density (%)TiN Crystal Size (nm)
(Goodness of fit—χ2)
TargetedCalculated
ISSMCPISSMCPISSMCP
7.59.84.998.399.955 (2.23)66 (2.69)
1512.813.098.099.570 (3.06)64 (2.39)
3021.624.197.698.398 (2.76)64 (2.12)
Table
Table 2. Electrical conductivity, material removal rates and surface roughness of composites machined by die sinking electrical discharge machining.
Table 2. Electrical conductivity, material removal rates and surface roughness of composites machined by die sinking electrical discharge machining.
Composition (vol% TiN)Electrical Conductivity (S·m−1)Material Removal Rate MRR (mm3min−1)Surface Roughness, Ra (µm)
ISSMCPISSMCPISSMCP
7.5<1 × 10−4<1 × 10−4----
152 <1 × 10−40.002-2.6-
307.0 × 1042.9 × 1040.0110.0054.14.5

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lazar, A.; Kosmač, T.; Zavašnik, J.; Abram, A.; Kocjan, A. TiN-Nanoparticulate-Reinforced ZrO2 for Electrical Discharge Machining. Materials 2019, 12, 2789. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172789

AMA Style

Lazar A, Kosmač T, Zavašnik J, Abram A, Kocjan A. TiN-Nanoparticulate-Reinforced ZrO2 for Electrical Discharge Machining. Materials. 2019; 12(17):2789. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172789

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lazar, Ana, Tomaž Kosmač, Janez Zavašnik, Anže Abram, and Andraž Kocjan. 2019. "TiN-Nanoparticulate-Reinforced ZrO2 for Electrical Discharge Machining" Materials 12, no. 17: 2789. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172789

APA Style

Lazar, A., Kosmač, T., Zavašnik, J., Abram, A., & Kocjan, A. (2019). TiN-Nanoparticulate-Reinforced ZrO2 for Electrical Discharge Machining. Materials, 12(17), 2789. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172789

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop