Evaluation of the Surrounding Ring of Two Different Extra-Short Implant Designs in Crestal Bone Maintanence: A Histologic Study in Dogs
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Surgical Procedure
2.2. Histological and Histomorphometric Analysis
2.3. Statistic Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Atwood, D.A. Reduction of residual ridge: A major oral disease entita. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1971, 26, 267–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, J.Y. The periodontist and the edentulous area-localised ridge augmentation. Int. Dent. J. 1998, 48, 326–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Morand, M.; Irinakis, T. The challenge of implant therapy in the posterior maxilla: Providing a rationale for the use of short implants. J. Oral Implantol. 2007, 33, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Annibali, S.; Cristalli, M.P.; Dell’Aquila, D.; Bignozzi, I.; La Monaca, G.; Pilloni, A. Short dental implants: A systematic review. J. Dent. Res. 2012, 91, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anitua, E.; Alkhraist, M.H.; Piñas, L.; Begoña, L.; Orive, G. Implant survival and crestal bone loss around extra-short implants supporting a fixed denture: The effect of crown height space, crown-to-implant ratio, and offset placement of the prosthesis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant 2014, 3, 682–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rajkumar, G.C.; Aher, V.; Ramaiya, S.; Manjunath, G.S.; Kumar, D.V. Implant placement in the atrophic posterior maxilla with sinus elevation without bone grafting: A 2-year prospective study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2013, 28, 526–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chiapasco, M.; Zaniboni, M.; Rimondini, L. Autogenous onlay bone grafts vs. alveolar distraction osteogenesis for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: A 2–4-year prospective study on humans. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2007, 18, 432–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Esposito, M.; Grusovin, M.G.; Felice, P.; Karatzopoulos, G.; Worthington, H.V.; Coulthard, P. The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmentation procedures for dental implants-a Cochrane systematic review. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2009, 2, 167–184. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Felice, P.; Barausse, C.; Pistilli, V.; Piattelli, M.; Ippolito, D.R.; Esposito, M. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long × 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year post-loading results from a randomised controlled trial. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2018, 11, 175–187. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Gastaldi, G.; Felice, P.; Pistilli, V.; Barausse, C.; Ippolito, D.R.; Esposito, M. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 × 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year results from a randomised controlled trial. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2018, 11, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Bolle, C.; Felice, P.; Barausse, C.; Pistilli, V.; Trullenque-Eriksson, A.; Esposito, M. 4 mm long vs longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic jaws: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2018, 11, 31–47. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Gastaldi, G.; Felice, P.; Pistilli, R.; Barausse, C.; Trullenque-Eriksson, A.; Esposito, M. Short implants as an alternative to crestal sinus lift: A 3-year multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2017, 10, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Esposito, M.; Zucchelli, G.; Barausse, C.; Pistilli, R.; Trullenque-Eriksson, A.; Felice, P. Four mm-long versus longer implants in augmented bone in atrophic posterior jaws: 4-month post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2016, 9, 393–409. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Renouard, F.; Nisand, D. Short implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: A 2-year retrospective clinical study. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2005, 7, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esposito, M.; Barausse, C.; Pistilli, R.; Sammartino, G.; Grandi, G.; Felice, P. Short implants versus bone augmentation for placing longer implants in atrophic maxillae: One-year post-loading results of a pilot randomised controlled trial. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2015, 8, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Atieh, M.A.; Zadeh, H.; Stanford, C.M.; Cooper, L.F. Survival of short dental implants for treatment of posterior partial edentulism: A systematic review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2012, 27, 1323–1331. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Pommer, B.; Frantal, S.; Willer, J.; Posch, M.; Watzek, G.; Tepper, G. Impact of dental implant length on early failure rates: A meta-analysis of observational studies. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2011, 38, 856–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pommer, B.; Mailath-Pokorny, G.; Haas, R.; Buseniechner, D.; Millesi, W.; Fürhauser, R. Extra-short (<7 mm) and extra-narrow diameter (<3.5 mm) implants: A meta-analytic literature review. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2018, 11, S137–S146. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Grant, B.T.; Pancko, F.X.; Kraut, R. Outcomes of placing short dental implants in the posterior mandible: A retrospective study of 124 cases. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2009, 67, 713–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lopez Torres, J.A.; Gehrke, S.A.; Calvo Guirado, J.L.; Aristazábal, L.F.R. Evaluation of four designs of short implants placed in atrophic areas with reduced bone height: A three-year, retrospective, clinical and radiographic study. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2017, 55, 703–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Slotte, C.; Grønningsaeter, A.; Halmøy, A.M.; Öhrnell, L.O.; Stroh, G.; Isaksson, S.; Johansson, L.Ä.; Mordenfeld, A.; Eklund, J.; Embring, J. Four-millimeter implants supporting fixed partial dental prostheses in the severely resorbed posterior mandible: Two-year results. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2012, 1, e46–e58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Monje, A.; Chan, H.L.; Fu, J.H.; Suarez, F.; Galindo-Moreno, P.; Wang, H.L. Are short dental implants (<10 mm) effective? A meta-analysis on prospective clinical trials. J. Periodontol. 2013, 84, 895–904. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Anitua, E.; Tapia, R.; Luzuriaga, F.; Orive, G. Influence of implant length, diameter, and geometry on stress distribution: A finite element analysis. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent. 2010, 1, 89–95. [Google Scholar]
- Anitua, E.; Orive, G. Short implants in maxillae and mandibles: A retrospective study with 1 to 8 years of follow-up. J. Periodontol. 2010, 81, 819–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abdelrahim, R.A.; Badr, N.A.; Baroudi, K. Effect of anodization and alkali-heat treatment on the bioactivity of titanium implant material (an in vitro study). J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2016, 6, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Hsiao, W.T.; Chang, H.C.; Nanci, A.; Durand, R. Surface microtexturing of Ti-6Al-4V using an ultraviolet laser system. Mater. Des. 2016, 90, 891–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gehrke, S.A.; Pérez-Díaz, L.; Dedavid, B.A. Quasi-static strength and fractography analysis of two dental implants manufactured by direct metal laser sintering. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2018, 20, 368–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lozano-Carrascal, N.; Salomó-Coll, O.; Hernández-Alfaro, F.; Gehrke, S.A.; Gargallo-Albiol, J.; Calvo-Guirado, J.L. Do topical applications of bisphosphonates improve bone formation in oral implantology? A systematic review. Med. Oral. Patol. Oral. Cir. Bucal. 2017, 22, e512–e519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Renouard, F.; Nisand, D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2006, 17, 35–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mangano, F.G.; Shibli, J.A.; Sammons, R.L.; Iaculli, F.; Piattelli, A.; Mangano, C. Short (8-mm) locking-taper implants supporting single crowns in posterior region: A prospective clinical study with 1-to 10-years of follow-up. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014, 25, 933–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mezzomo, L.A.; Miller, R.; Triches, D.; Alonso, F.; Shinkai, R.S. Meta-analysis of single crowns supported by short (<10 mm) implants in the posterior region. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2014, 41, 191–213. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Pierrisnard, L.; Renouard, F.; Renault, P.; Barquinis, M. Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2003, 5, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anitua, E.; Piñas, L.; Orive, G. Retrospective study of short and extra-short implants placed in posterior regions: Influence of crown-to-implant ratio on marginal bone loss. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2015, 17, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Blanes, R.J. To what extent does the crown-implant ratio affect the survival and complications of implant-supported reconstructions? A systematic review. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2009, 4, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rocke, D.J.; Tucci, D.L.; Marcus, J.; McClennen, J.; Kaylie, D. Osseointegrated implants for auricular defects: Operative techniques and complication management. Otol. Neurotol. 2014, 35, 1609–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bressan, E.; Sivolella, S.; Urrutia, Z.A.; Salata, L.A.; Lang, N.P.; Botticelli, D. Short implants (6 mm) installed immediately into extraction sockets: An experimental study in dogs. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2012, 23, 536–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Botzenhart, U.; Kunert-Keil, C.; Heinemann, F.; Gredes, T.; Seiler, J.; Berniczei-Roykó, Á.; Gedrange, T. Osseointegration of short titan implants: A pilot study in pigs. Ann. Anat. 2015, 199, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Calvo-Guirado, J.L.; López Torres, J.A.; Dard, M.; Javed, F.; Pérez-Albacete Martínez, C.; Maté Sánchez de Val, J.E. Evaluation of extrashort 4-mm implants in mandibular edentulous patients with reduced bone height in comparison with standard implants: A 12-month results. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2016, 27, 867–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goene, R.; Bianchesi, C.; Hurzeler, M.; Del Lupo, R.; Testori, T.; Davarpanah, M.; Jalbout, Z. Performance of short implants in partial restorations: 3-year follow-up of Osseotite implants. Impl. Dent. 2005, 14, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Short DM® Implant Position | Mean Maximum Insertion Torque (SD) | Median Insertion Torque | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
P2 | 40.21 ± 0.87 | 40 | 0.824 |
P3 | 42.87 ± 0.11 | 42 | 0.456 |
P4 | 44.68 ± 0.17 | 44 | 0.012 * |
Short DM Implant Position | Mean (SD) ISQ Day 0 | Median ISQ Day 0 | Mean (SD) ISQ 60 Days | Median ISQ 60 Days | Mean (SD) ISQ 90 Days | Median ISQ 90 Days | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P2 | 72.23 ± 0.72 | 69.22–71.56 | 73.22 ± 0.34 | 72.70–77.16 | 74.29 ± 0.11 | 72.57–76.23 | 0.782 |
P3 | 76.56 ± 0.12 | 75.34–77.23 | 80.17 ± 0.62 | 79.37–83.28 | 80.56 ± 0.12 | 78.67–82.22 | 0.923 |
P4 | 78.33 ± 0.37 | 76.31–80.12 | 80.11 ± 0.39 | 78.14–83.12 | 82.34 ± 0.17 | 80.34–85.23 | 0.672 |
Short DM Implant Position | Mean (SD) ISQ Day 0 | Median ISQ Day 0 | Mean (SD) ISQ 60 Days | Median ISQ 60 Days | Mean (SD) ISQ 90 Days | Median ISQ 90 Days | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P2 | 70.52 ± 0.41 | 69.81–72.76 | 73.45 ± 0.11 | 72.89–75.26 | 75.99 ± 0.76 | 74.38–78.33 | 0.782 |
P3 | 74.78 ± 0.11 | 73.22–76.18 | 78.66 ± 0.62 | 77.37–80.12 | 80.14 ± 0.89 | 78.67–82.78 | 0.923 |
P4 | 76.38 ± 0.22 | 74.11–78.11 | 79.81 ± 0.39 | 77.14–80.34 | 81.11 ± 0.34 | 80.34–83.14 | 0.672 |
Time of Measurements | Mean (SD) Bone Loss at Short Implants P2 (mm) | Median Short Implants P2 (mm) | Mean (SD) Bone Loss at Short Implants P3 (mm) | Median at Short Implants P3 (mm) | Mean (SD) Bone Loss at Short Implants P4 (mm) | Median at Short Implants P4 (mm) | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
60 days | 0.75 ± 0.22 | 0.7 | 0.78 ± 0.19 | 0.7 | 0.71 ± 0.11 | 0.7 | 0.012 * |
90 days | 0.89 ± 0.18 | 0.8 | 0.86 ± 0.59 | 0.8 | 0.75 ± 0.52 | 0.7 | 0.134 * |
Time of Measurements | Mean (SD) Bone Loss at Short Implants P2 (mm) | Median Short Implants P2 (mm) | Mean (SD) Bone Loss at Short Implants P3 (mm) | Median at Short Implants P3 (mm) | Mean (SD) Bone Loss at Short Implants P4 (mm) | Median at Short Implants P4 (mm) | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
60 days | 0.82 ± 0.11 | 0.8 | 0.80 ± 0.56 | 0.8 | 0.79 ± 0.25 | 0.7 | 0.382 |
90 days | 0.97 ± 0.91 | 0.9 | 0.89 ± 0.23 | 0.8 | 0.79 ± 0.67 | 0.7 | 0.572 |
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Calvo-Guirado, J.L.; Morales-Meléndez, H.; Pérez-Albacete Martínez, C.; Morales-Schwarz, D.; Kolerman, R.; Fernández-Domínguez, M.; Gehrke, S.A.; Maté-Sánchez de Val, J.E. Evaluation of the Surrounding Ring of Two Different Extra-Short Implant Designs in Crestal Bone Maintanence: A Histologic Study in Dogs. Materials 2018, 11, 1630. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11091630
Calvo-Guirado JL, Morales-Meléndez H, Pérez-Albacete Martínez C, Morales-Schwarz D, Kolerman R, Fernández-Domínguez M, Gehrke SA, Maté-Sánchez de Val JE. Evaluation of the Surrounding Ring of Two Different Extra-Short Implant Designs in Crestal Bone Maintanence: A Histologic Study in Dogs. Materials. 2018; 11(9):1630. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11091630
Chicago/Turabian StyleCalvo-Guirado, José Luis, Hilde Morales-Meléndez, Carlos Pérez-Albacete Martínez, David Morales-Schwarz, Roni Kolerman, Manuel Fernández-Domínguez, Sérgio Alexandre Gehrke, and José Eduardo Maté-Sánchez de Val. 2018. "Evaluation of the Surrounding Ring of Two Different Extra-Short Implant Designs in Crestal Bone Maintanence: A Histologic Study in Dogs" Materials 11, no. 9: 1630. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11091630
APA StyleCalvo-Guirado, J. L., Morales-Meléndez, H., Pérez-Albacete Martínez, C., Morales-Schwarz, D., Kolerman, R., Fernández-Domínguez, M., Gehrke, S. A., & Maté-Sánchez de Val, J. E. (2018). Evaluation of the Surrounding Ring of Two Different Extra-Short Implant Designs in Crestal Bone Maintanence: A Histologic Study in Dogs. Materials, 11(9), 1630. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11091630