Next Article in Journal
Removal of Ciprofloxacin from Aqueous Solutions Using Pillared Clays
Next Article in Special Issue
The Osteogenic and Tenogenic Differentiation Potential of C3H10T1/2 (Mesenchymal Stem Cell Model) Cultured on PCL/PLA Electrospun Scaffolds in the Absence of Specific Differentiation Medium
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancement of Osteoblastic-Like Cell Activity by Glow Discharge Plasma Surface Modified Hydroxyapatite/β-Tricalcium Phosphate Bone Substitute
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fluorescent Magnetopolymersomes: A Theranostic Platform to Track Intracellular Delivery

In Vitro Evaluation of PCL and P(3HB) as Coating Materials for Selective Laser Melted Porous Titanium Implants

Small Animal Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, D-30559 Hannover, Germany
Division of Medicine Clinic III, Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine, University of Rostock, D-18057 Rostock, Germany
Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Rostock University Medical Center, D-18119 Rostock, Germany
Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Applied Sciences, D-49076 Osnabrueck, Germany
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hannover Medical School, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
Clinic for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
Institut fuer Werkstoffkunde, Leibniz Universitaet Hannover, D-30823 Garbsen, Germany
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Materials 2017, 10(12), 1344;
Received: 14 September 2017 / Revised: 1 November 2017 / Accepted: 20 November 2017 / Published: 23 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymeric Materials for Medical Applications)
Titanium is widely used as a bone implant material due to its biocompatibility and high resilience. Since its Young’s modulus differs from bone tissue, the resulting “stress shielding” could lead to scaffold loosening. However, by using a scaffold-shaped geometry, the Young’s modulus can be adjusted. Also, a porous geometry enables vascularisation and bone ingrowth inside the implant itself. Additionally, growth factors can improve these effects. In order to create a deposit and release system for these factors, the titanium scaffolds could be coated with degradable polymers. Therefore, in the present study, synthetic poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) and the biopolymer poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (P(3HB)) were tested for coating efficiency, cell adhesion, and biocompatibility to find a suitable coating material. The underlying scaffold was created from titanium by Selective Laser Melting (SLM) and coated with PCL or P(3HB) via dip coating. To test the biocompatibility, Live Cell Imaging (LCI) as well as vitality and proliferation assays were performed. In addition, cell adhesion forces were detected via Single Cell Force Spectroscopy, while the coating efficiency was observed using environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analyses. Regarding the coating efficiency, PCL showed higher values in comparison to P(3HB). Vitality assays revealed decent vitality values for both polymers, while values for PCL were significantly lower than those for blank titanium. No significant differences could be observed between PCL and P(3HB) in proliferation and cell adhesion studies. Although LCI observations revealed decreasing values in cell number and populated area over time on both polymer-coated scaffolds, these outcomes could be explained by the possibility of coating diluent residues accumulating in the culture medium. Overall, both polymers fulfill the requirements regarding biocompatibility. Nonetheless, since only PCL coating ensured the maintenance of the porous implant structure, it is preferable to be used as a coating material for creating a deposit and release system for growth factors. View Full-Text
Keywords: titanium scaffold; polycaprolactone; poly(3-hydroxybutyrate); osteoblast titanium scaffold; polycaprolactone; poly(3-hydroxybutyrate); osteoblast
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Grau, M.; Matena, J.; Teske, M.; Petersen, S.; Aliuos, P.; Roland, L.; Grabow, N.; Murua Escobar, H.; Gellrich, N.-C.; Haferkamp, H.; Nolte, I. In Vitro Evaluation of PCL and P(3HB) as Coating Materials for Selective Laser Melted Porous Titanium Implants. Materials 2017, 10, 1344.

AMA Style

Grau M, Matena J, Teske M, Petersen S, Aliuos P, Roland L, Grabow N, Murua Escobar H, Gellrich N-C, Haferkamp H, Nolte I. In Vitro Evaluation of PCL and P(3HB) as Coating Materials for Selective Laser Melted Porous Titanium Implants. Materials. 2017; 10(12):1344.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Grau, Michael, Julia Matena, Michael Teske, Svea Petersen, Pooyan Aliuos, Laura Roland, Niels Grabow, Hugo Murua Escobar, Nils-Claudius Gellrich, Heinz Haferkamp, and Ingo Nolte. 2017. "In Vitro Evaluation of PCL and P(3HB) as Coating Materials for Selective Laser Melted Porous Titanium Implants" Materials 10, no. 12: 1344.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop