Chemiluminescence-Based Analysis of Syngas/Diesel Dual-Fuel Combustion in an Optically Accessible Engine
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Experimental Set-Up and Methodology
2.1. Experimental Set-Up
2.2. Optical Imaging Set-Up
2.3. Imaging Post-Processing
- First, a circular region-of-interest matching the piston-window diameter was applied to exclude parasitic light reflected by the piston crown and cylinder walls, so that only radiation transmitted through the quartz window was retained for analysis.
- To reduce background noise, a background image was generated for each cycle by averaging three images acquired 3 crank-angle degrees (CADs) before the start of combustion. This background was subtracted from each individual image. The corrected images were then ensemble-averaged at each CAD over 40 cycles, and the corresponding mean pixel intensity was computed.
- In addition, the ignition timing for each individual cycle was detected from a moving-median filter applied to a 10 × 10 pixel2 interrogation window: when the median intensity in this window exceeded twice the median value of the same window over the preceding four CADs and was also above the noise threshold (100 counts), the corresponding CAD was flagged as an ignition spot.
- The ignition spot was then verified manually for each firing cycle to avoid misidentification. This was necessary for the CO2’s diluted composition variations, where the ignition CAD could be mistakenly spotted.
2.4. Methodology
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. The Case of Decane Pilot Ignition by Itself
3.2. Comparison of the Different Syngas Compositions
3.3. Effect of the CO2 and CH4 Content on the Syngas Ignition
3.3.1. The CO2 Concentration Effect
3.3.2. The CH4 Concentration Effect
4. Conclusions
- Under the selected syngas/decane dual-fuel operating conditions, no soot incandescence is detected in the OH* and CH2O* chemiluminescence signals, which is attributed to the small, injected mass of decane. However, soot interference is noted in the CH* chemiluminescence images (i.e., at 431 nm), manifesting as a plateau in the corresponding average signal.
- Updraft and Downdraft display comparable OH* behavior, with similar ignition delays and overall intensity levels. The Fluidbed blend behaves differently, showing an OH* intensity about three times lower and a longer ignition delay. Increasing CO2 dilution weakens the OH* maximum and, when a certain limit is reached, OH* chemiluminescence can peak earlier than the Heat-Release Ratio’s (HRR).
- When the OH* average signal is compared with the apparent HRR, their peak timings do not coincide, indicating that OH* is not perfectly phased with the global heat-release evolution. The cycle-averaged CH* and CH2O* signals follow the HRR profile more closely, although they still do not fully resolve the very beginning of combustion development.
- The impacts of CO2 dilution and CH4 enrichment are examined to rationalize the ignition delay trends measured in the engine. On the Fluidbed blend, the higher CH4 fraction counterbalances its larger CO2 share, leading to comparable ignition behavior despite the stronger dilution. In contrast, Updraft gas combines a higher CO content with a lower CO2 level, which can plausibly explain why its ignition delay remains close to that of the Downdraft mixture, in line with reports that variations in the H2/CO ratio have no major effect on ignition delay.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Nomenclature
| X/air | Equivalence Ratio of fuel X in air |
| Premixed Equivalence Ratio of the charge | |
| ATDC | After top dead center |
| BTDC | Before top dead center |
| CAXX | Crank angle where XX% of the heat was released |
| CAD | Crank angle degree |
| CH2O* | Excited formaldehyde chemiluminescence |
| CH* | Excited CH chemiluminescence |
| CL | Chemiluminescence |
| CNG | Compressed natural gas |
| CO2 | Carbon dioxide |
| CR | Compression ratio |
| CI | Compression ignition |
| EGR | Exhaust gas recirculation |
| GHG | Greenhouse gas |
| HCCI | Homogeneous charge compression ignition |
| HRR | Heat-release rate |
| ICE | Internal combustion engine |
| IDT | Ignition delay time |
| IRO | High-speed image intensifier |
| LCA | Life cycle analysis |
| LHV | Lower heating value |
| LIF/PLIF | Laser-induced fluorescence/planar laser-induced fluorescence |
| Pin | Intake Pressure |
| MSW | Municipal solid waste |
| NG | Natural gas |
| OH* | Excited OH radical chemiluminescence |
| O2 | Oxygen |
| RCM | Rapid compression machine |
| RPM | Revolutions per minute |
| SI | Spark ignition |
| SOI | Start of injection |
| Tad. | Adiabatic flame temperature |
| Tin | Intake temperature |
| TDC | Top dead center |
| THC | Total hydrocarbons |
References
- Internacional Energy Agency. Net Zero Roadmap: Keep the 1.5 °C Goal A Global Pathway to in Reach; Internacional Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, H.; Hanna, M.A.; Jones, D.D. Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Feedlot Manure Management Practices: Land Application versus Gasification. Biomass Bioenergy 2013, 54, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ardolino, F.; Arena, U. Biowaste-to-Biomethane: An LCA Study on Biogas and Syngas Roads. Waste Manag. 2019, 87, 441–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dastjerdi, B.; Strezov, V.; Rajaeifar, M.A.; Kumar, R.; Behnia, M. A Systematic Review on Life Cycle Assessment of Different Waste to Energy Valorization Technologies. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 290, 125747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schweitzer, D.; Gredinger, A.; Schmid, M.; Waizmann, G.; Beirow, M.; Spörl, R.; Scheffknecht, G. Steam Gasification of Wood Pellets, Sewage Sludge and Manure: Gasification Performance and Concentration of Impurities. Biomass Bioenergy 2018, 111, 308–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bridgwater, A.V. The Technical and Economic Feasibility of Biomass Gasification for Power Generation. Fuel 1995, 74, 631–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomson, R.; Kwong, P.; Ahmad, E.; Nigam, K.D.P. Clean Syngas from Small Commercial Biomass Gasifiers; a Review of Gasifier Development, Recent Advances and Performance Evaluation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 21087–21111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gasification Plant Databases|Netl.Doe.Gov. Available online: https://www.netl.doe.gov/research/coal/energy-systems/gasification/gasification-plant-databases (accessed on 27 May 2023).
- Rabello de Castro, R.; Brequigny, P.; Dufitumukiza, J.P.; Mounaïm-Rousselle, C. Laminar Flame Speed of Different Syngas Compositions for Varying Thermodynamic Conditions. Fuel 2021, 301, 121025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thi, L.D.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, Z. Shock Tube Study on Ignition Delay of Multi-Component Syngas Mixtures—Effect of Equivalence Ratio. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 6034–6043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paykani, A.; Chehrmonavari, H.; Tsolakis, A.; Alger, T.; Northrop, W.F.; Reitz, R.D. Synthesis Gas as a Fuel for Internal Combustion Engines in Transportation. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2022, 90, 100995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sridhar, G.; Babu, R. Facts about Producer Gas Engine. In Paths to Sustainable Energy; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Azimov, U.; Tomita, E.; Kawahara, N.; Harada, Y. Effect of Syngas Composition on Combustion and Exhaust Emission Characteristics in a Pilot-Ignited Dual-Fuel Engine Operated in PREMIER Combustion Mode. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 11985–11996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carlucci, A.P.; Ficarella, A.; Laforgia, D.; Strafella, L. Improvement of Dual-Fuel Biodiesel-Producer Gas Engine Performance Acting on Biodiesel Injection Parameters and Strategy. Fuel 2017, 209, 754–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, P.; Kumar, R.; Sharma, S.; Kumar, S. Effect of Engine Parameters on the Performance of Dual-Fuel CI Engines with Producer Gas—A Review. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 16377–16402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, M.; Kaushal, R. Performance and Exhaust Emission Analysis of a Variable Compression Ratio (VCR) Dual Fuel CI Engine Fuelled with Producer Gas Generated from Pistachio Shells. Fuel 2021, 283, 118924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rabello de Castro, R.; Brequigny, P.; Mounaïm-Rousselle, C. A Multiparameter Investigation of Syngas/Diesel Dual-Fuel Engine Performance and Emissions with Various Syngas Compositions. Fuel 2022, 318, 123736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srna, A.; von Rotz, B.; Bolla, M.; Wright, Y.M.; Herrmann, K.; Boulouchos, K.; Bruneaux, G. Experimental Investigation of Pilot-Fuel Combustion in Dual-Fuel Engines, Part 2: Understanding the Underlying Mechanisms by Means of Optical Diagnostics. Fuel 2019, 255, 115766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, H.; Ladommatos, N. Optical Diagnostics for Soot and Temperature Measurement in Diesel Engines. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 1998, 24, 221–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaydon, A.G. The Spectroscopy of Flames; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1974. [Google Scholar]
- Mancaruso, E.; Todino, M.; Vaglieco, B.M. Study on Dual Fuel Combustion in an Optical Research Engine by Infrared Diagnostics Varying Methane Quantity and Engine Speed. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2020, 178, 115623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Augusta, R.; Foster, D.E.; Ghandhi, J.B.; Eng, J.; Najt, P.M. Chemiluminescence Measurements of Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) Combustion. SAE Technical Paper, 3 April 2006; 2006-01-1520. [CrossRef]
- Srna, A.; Bruneaux, G.; von Rotz, B.; Bombach, R.; Herrmann, K.; Boulouchos, K. Optical Investigation of Sooting Propensity of N-Dodecane Pilot/Lean-Premixed Methane Dual-Fuel Combustion in a Rapid Compression-Expansion Machine. SAE Int. J. Engines 2018, 11, 1049–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, H.W.; Zhang, Y. Syngas Combustion Radiation Profiling through Spectrometry and DFCD Processing Techniques. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 5257–5267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srna, A.; von Rotz, B.; Herrmann, K.; Boulouchos, K.; Bruneaux, G. Experimental Investigation of Pilot-Fuel Combustion in Dual-Fuel Engines, Part 1: Thermodynamic Analysis of Combustion Phenomena. Fuel 2019, 255, 115642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dahms, R.N.; Paczko, G.A.; Skeen, S.A.; Pickett, L.M. Understanding the Ignition Mechanism of High-Pressure Spray Flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2017, 36, 2615–2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, Z.; Aryal, J.; Ranta, O.; Kaario, O.; Vuorinen, V.; Larmi, M. An Optical Characterization of Dual-Fuel Combustion in a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine. SAE Technical Paper, 3 April 2018; pp. 1–10, 2018-01-0252. [CrossRef]
- Ulishney, C.J.; Dumitrescu, C.E. Optical Investigation of Methane, Ethane, or Propane and Diesel at Low Load RCCI Conditions. Fuel 2023, 355, 129472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wüthrich, S.; Cartier, P.; Süess, P.; Schneider, B.; Obrecht, P.; Herrmann, K. Optical Investigation and Thermodynamic Analysis of Premixed Ammonia Dual-Fuel Combustion Initiated by Dodecane Pilot Fuel. Fuel Commun. 2022, 12, 100074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, W.; Zeng, W.; Guo, L.; Zhang, H.; Yan, Y.; Lin, S.; Zhu, G.; Jiang, M.; Yu, C.; Wu, F. An Optical Study of the Combustion and Flame Development of Ammonia-Diesel Dual-Fuel Engine Based on Flame Chemiluminescence. Fuel 2023, 349, 128507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solferini de Carvalho, F.; Peñaranda Mendoza, A.; Ribeiro dos Santos, L.; Henrique Rufino, C.; Malheiro de Oliveira, E.; Ferreira Silva, M.; Blanco Machin, E.; Travieso Pedroso, D.; Teixeira Lacava, P. Experimental Study of the Methane and Producer Gas Blends in an Optical Spark Ignition Engine: Combustion Characteristics, Thermodynamics and Emissions. Int. J. Engine Res. 2023, 24, 2708–2726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solferini de Carvalho, F.; Rufino, C.H.; Malheiro de Oliveira, E.; Mendoza, A.P.; Ribeiro dos Santos, L.; Machin, E.B.; Pedroso, D.T.; Lacava, P.T. Experimental Investigation of Hydrogen-Producer Gas Mixtures in an Optically Accessible SI Engine. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 58, 500–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shudo, T.; Nakajima, Y.; Tsuga, K. Combustion Characteristics of H2-CO-CO2 Mixture in an IC Engine. SAE Technical Paper, 5 March 2001; 2001-01-0252. [CrossRef]
- Shudo, T.; Nagano, T.; Robavashi, M. Combustion Characteristics of Waste-Pyrolysis Gases in an Internal Combustion Engine. Int. J. Automot. Technol. 2003, 4, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Martinez-Boggio, S.D.D.; Merola, S.S.S.; Teixeira Lacava, P.; Irimescu, A.; Curto-Risso, P.L. Effect of Fuel and Air Dilution on Syngas Combustion in an Optical SI Engine. Energies 2019, 12, 1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srna, A.; Bombach, R.; Herrmann, K.; Bruneaux, G. Characterization of the Spectral Signature of Dual-Fuel Combustion Luminosity: Implications for Evaluation of Natural Luminosity Imaging. Appl. Phys. B Lasers Opt. 2019, 125, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Q.; Ahmad, Z.; Kaario, O.; Larmi, M. Simultaneous Visualization of Natural Luminosity and Chemiluminescence of Dual Fuel Combustion in an Optically Accessible Engine. SAE Technical Paper, 14 April 2020; 2020-01-0309. [CrossRef]
- Yu, X.; Zha, K.; Luo, X.; Taraza, D.; Jansons, M. Simulation and Experimental Measurement of CO2*, OH* and CH2O* Chemiluminescence from an Optical Diesel Engine Fueled with n-Heptane. SAE Technical Paper, 8 September 2013; 2013-24-0010. [CrossRef]
- Dubreuil, A.; Foucher, F.; Mounaïm-Rousselle, C. Analysis of Flame and OH* Natural Emissions of N-Heptane Combustion in a Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) Engine: Effect of Burnt Gas Dilution. Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 1406–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schlatter, S.; Schneider, B.; Wright, Y.M.; Boulouchos, K. N-Heptane Micro Pilot Assisted Methane Combustion in a Rapid Compression Expansion Machine. Fuel 2016, 179, 339–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bihari, B.; Gupta, S.B.; Biruduganti, M.; Sekar, R.R. Diagnostics for Combustion Metrics in Natural Gas Fuelled Reciprocating Engines. SAE Technical Paper, 19 January 2011; 2011-26-0007. [CrossRef]
- Rajasegar, R.; Srna, A.; Lee, T. Impact of Hydrogen on the Ignition and Combustion Behavior Diesel Sprays in a Dual Fuel, Diesel-Piloted, Premixed Hydrogen Engine. SAE Int. J. Adv. Curr. Prac. Mobil. 2024, 6, 1762–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, S.K.; Mittal, M. Analysis of Cycle-To-Cycle Combustion Variations in a Spark-Ignition Engine Operating under Various Biogas Compositions. Energy Fuels 2019, 33, 12421–12430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rabello de Castro, R. Effect of the Fuel Composition of Syngas on the Combustion Process in Dual-Fuel Engine. Ph.D. Thesis, Université d’Orléans, Orléans, France, 2024. [Google Scholar]


















| Displaced Volume: | 499 cm3 |
| Bore: | 85 mm |
| Stroke: | 88 mm |
| Optical Window Diameter: | 50 mm |
| Rod Length: | 145 mm |
| Compression Ratio (CR): | 15.6:1 * |
| Swirl Ratio: | 2.0 |
| Piston Bowl Type: | “Mexican hat” |
| Firing TDC Position: | 0 CAD |
| Intake Valve Opening: | 351 CAD ATDC |
| Intake Valve Closure: | 157 CAD BTDC |
| Exhaust Valve Opening: | 140 CAD ATDC |
| Exhaust Valve Closure: | 366 CAD ATDC |
| Coolant Temperature: | 85 °C (358 K) |
| Oil Temperature: | 80 °C (353 K) |
| Gas Type | Controller | Full Scale | Uncertainty |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIR | Brooks 5853S | 500 NL/min | ±0.5% |
| N2 | Brooks 5851S | 100 NL/min | ±0.9% |
| CO | Brooks 5851S | 100 NL/min | ±0.9% |
| H2 | SLA5850 | 50 NL/min | ±1.0% |
| CO2 | SLA5850 | 37 NL/min | ±1.0% |
| CH4 | SLA5850 | 5 NL/min | ±1.0% |
| Variation | H2 (%vol) | CO (%vol) | CO2 (%vol) | CH4 (%vol) | N2 (%vol) | Diluents- CO2+N2 (%) | LHV (KJ/m3) | Tad. (K) | SU° (cm/s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FB–0CO2-CH4 | 9 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 77 | 77.0 | 2599 | 1868 | 32.3 |
| FB–10CO2 | 10 | 0 | 67 | 77.0 | 2599 | 1834 | 24.3 | ||
| FB–20CO2 | 20 | 0 | 57 | 77.0 | 2599 | 1802 | 14.9 | ||
| FB–2.5CH4 | 0 | 2.5 | 74.5 | 74.5 | 3448 | 1955 | 33.0 | ||
| FB–5CH4 | 0 | 5 | 72 | 72.0 | 4297 | 2016 | 35.0 | ||
| FB–REFERENCE | 20 | 7 | 50 | 70.0 | 4977 | 2004 | 26.4 | ||
| UD–0CO2-CH4 | 11 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 65.0 | 4003 | 2092 | 61.5 |
| UD–10CO2 | 10 | 0 | 55 | 65.0 | 4003 | 2059 | 51.1 | ||
| UD–20CO2 | 20 | 0 | 45 | 65.0 | 4003 | 2028 | 41.9 | ||
| UD–2.5CH4 | 0 | 2.5 | 62.5 | 62.5 | 4852 | 2131 | 59.5 | ||
| UD–5CH4 | 0 | 5 | 60 | 60.0 | 5701 | 2160 | 58.2 | ||
| UD–REFERENCE | 9 | 3 | 53 | 62.0 | 5022 | 2112 | 51.1 | ||
| DD–0CO2-CH4 | 17 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 62 | 62.0 | 4257 | 2120 | 83.0 |
| DD–10CO2 | 10 | 0 | 52 | 62.0 | 4257 | 2088 | 69.1 | ||
| DD–20CO2 | 20 | 0 | 42 | 62.0 | 4257 | 2057 | 57.9 | ||
| DD–2.5CH4 | 0 | 2.5 | 59.5 | 59.5 | 5106 | 2154 | 75.4 | ||
| DD–5CH4 | 0 | 5 | 57 | 57.0 | 5955 | 2178 | 71.2 | ||
| DD–REFERENCE | 13 | 1 | 48 | 61.0 | 4597 | 2095 | 62.7 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Rabello de Castro, R.; Brequigny, P.; Mounaïm-Rousselle, C. Chemiluminescence-Based Analysis of Syngas/Diesel Dual-Fuel Combustion in an Optically Accessible Engine. Energies 2026, 19, 2042. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19092042
Rabello de Castro R, Brequigny P, Mounaïm-Rousselle C. Chemiluminescence-Based Analysis of Syngas/Diesel Dual-Fuel Combustion in an Optically Accessible Engine. Energies. 2026; 19(9):2042. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19092042
Chicago/Turabian StyleRabello de Castro, Ricardo, Pierre Brequigny, and Christine Mounaïm-Rousselle. 2026. "Chemiluminescence-Based Analysis of Syngas/Diesel Dual-Fuel Combustion in an Optically Accessible Engine" Energies 19, no. 9: 2042. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19092042
APA StyleRabello de Castro, R., Brequigny, P., & Mounaïm-Rousselle, C. (2026). Chemiluminescence-Based Analysis of Syngas/Diesel Dual-Fuel Combustion in an Optically Accessible Engine. Energies, 19(9), 2042. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19092042

