Research Status and Technical Progress of Hydrogen-Fueled Gas Turbine
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Methodology and Review Structure
2.1. Literature Search and Selection
2.2. Analytical Framework
- (1)
- Combustion Characteristics and Challenges: Focusing on hydrogen’s thermophysical properties, flame dynamics, flashback mechanisms, thermoacoustic oscillations, and NOx formation.
- (2)
- Advanced Combustion Technologies: Reviewing technological developments such as diffusion-flame, dry low-emission (DLE), micromix, and axial-staged combustion systems.
- (3)
- Systemic Modifications and Safety: Examining material compatibility, hydrogen embrittlement, hot-end component design, purge protocols, and overall turbine retrofit requirements.
2.3. Review Structure Overview
3. Characteristics of Hydrogen Fuel Combustion
- (1)
- The flame speed of hydrogen is an order of magnitude greater than that of natural gas; when mixed with hydrogen, the potential energy of the natural gas jet is diminished, and the stability of the combustion flame is positioned closer to the nozzle.
- (2)
- The adiabatic flame temperature of hydrogen exceeds that of methane by approximately 150 K at the same equivalence ratio in a lean premixed burner, leading to localized temperatures exceeding 2000 °C in the burner, which has significant implications for pollutant management and internal cooling.
- (3)
- Hydrogen possesses merely 7% of the ignition energy of methane, and the inlet pressures and temperatures of contemporary gas turbines facilitate self-ignition in the premixed portion.
- (4)
- Hydrogen exhibits reactivity that is 100 times greater than that of methane, possesses a broader flammability range in air, and necessitates more stringent operating safety standards.
- (5)
- A reduced Wobbe index for gas necessitates more adaptable combustion systems and corresponding control mechanisms, together with enhanced fuel supply capacity.
- (6)
- Hydrogen atoms are minuscule and can readily permeate the internal structure of materials.
3.1. Flashback
- (1)
- Boundary Layer Flashback (BLF) is a phenomenon in which a flame propagates upstream along the burner wall boundary layer, which is characterized by a low-velocity shear flow;
- (2)
- A phenomenon characterized by flame propagation in the core region of a combustion-induced vortex breakdown (CIVB);
- (3)
- Bulk Flow Flashback (BFF) is defined as flashback through the flow core, triggered when the flame speed surpasses the bulk flow velocity;
- (4)
- Flashback as a result of combustion instabilities.
| Mechanism | Acronym | Driving Factor | Typical Location | Key Influencing Factors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boundary Layer Flashback | BLF | Low velocity near wall | Swirl burners with centerbody | Hydrogen fraction, boundary layer velocity profile |
| Combustion-Induced Vortex Breakdown | CIVB | Vortex breakdown induced by heat release | Swirl burners without centerbody | Swirl number, equivalence ratio, hydrogen diffusivity |
| Bulk Flow Flashback | BFF | Flame speed > bulk flow velocity | Core flow region | Turbulent flame speed, fuel composition, mixing uniformity |
| Combustion Instability Flashback | - | Thermoacoustic oscillations | Entire premixed zone | Pressure oscillations, hydrogen reactivity, system acoustics |

3.2. Thermoacoustic Oscillation
- (1)
- Hydrogen’s faster heat release can advance the phase of relative to , potentially satisfying Equation (1) over a wider range of equivalence ratios.
- (2)
- This explains why hydrogen enrichment can shift instability regions and promote thermoacoustic oscillations even under nominally stable methane conditions.
3.3. NOx Emission
4. Advanced Combustion Technologies for Gas Turbines
4.1. Diffusion-Flame Combustion

4.2. DLE Combustion
4.3. Micromix Combustion
4.4. Axial Staged Combustion Technology
4.4.1. Fuel Staging
4.4.2. Air Staging (RQL)
5. Modification of Gas Turbine from the NG to Hydrogen
5.1. Materials of Hot-End Component
5.2. Embrittlement of Material Hydrogen
5.3. Purging of Hydrogen Gas Turbine
5.4. Safety Standards and Engineering Protocols
5.4.1. Design and Material Standards
- (1)
- ISO 19880-1:2020 [125]: Gaseous hydrogen—Fueling stations—Part 1: General requirements. Provides guidelines for hydrogen handling infrastructure, including compressors, storage, and dispensing systems relevant to gas turbine fuel supply.
- (2)
- ASME B31.12:2023 [126]: Hydrogen Piping and Pipelines. Specifies design, construction, and inspection requirements for hydrogen transport pipelines, emphasizing leak prevention and material compatibility.
5.4.2. Operational and Maintenance Protocols
- (1)
- Leak Detection Systems: Continuous monitoring using catalytic, electrochemical, or infrared sensors is mandated in enclosed spaces. Alarm thresholds are typically set at 10–25% of the lower flammability limit (LFL) for hydrogen (≈0.4–1.0 vol%), according to NFPA 2:2023 [127].
- (2)
- Purge Procedures: As outlined in Section 5.3, purging must follow ISO 16110-1 [128] and IGEM/SR/25 [129] standards, which specify inert gas (e.g., nitrogen) purge sequences, flow rates, and duration to achieve hydrogen concentrations below 1 vol% before maintenance or fuel switching.
- (3)
- Ventilation Requirements: Enclosures housing hydrogen components must maintain ventilation rates sufficient to prevent hydrogen accumulation, as per EN 60079-10-1:2021 [130] (Explosive atmospheres—Part 10-1: Classification of areas).
5.4.3. Emergency Response and Risk Mitigation
- (1)
- (2)
- Active Safety Controls: Automatic shutdown systems triggered by leak detection, flame sensors, or abnormal pressure/temperature excursions, aligned with IEC61511 [133] (Functional safety—Safety instrumented systems).
- (3)
- Training and Certification: Personnel involved in hydrogen turbine operations should be trained under frameworks such as ISO 22734 [134] (Hydrogen generators using water electrolysis—Industrial, commercial, and residential applications) and EIGA Doc 121/14 [135] (Safe operation of hydrogen-fueled gas turbines).
5.4.4. Industry-Specific Guidelines
6. Conclusions and Prospects
6.1. Summary of Findings
- (1)
- Hydrogen has significantly distinct physical properties compared to NG, altering the structure and dynamics of the combustion flame. Research on hydrogen combustion mostly examines its mixed combustion with other synthesis gases, whereas experimental data and mathematical models about pure hydrogen combustion are limited, complicating the implementation of hydrogen gas turbines. Lean premixed burn can diminish NOx emissions during hydrogen burn, yet it may induce combustion instability and elevate NOx production. Consequently, future research should focus more on the burn characteristics of pure hydrogen itself and the burn instability it causes.
- (2)
- The primary development avenues for hydrogen gas turbine combustors involve the modification of traditional combustors and the creation of novel hydrogen combustors. The potential of the existing LPM combustor, based on strong swirl premixing, whose combustion air premixing ratio is often above 98%, has been realized, and it is no longer possible to meet the ever-increasing performance requirements of gas turbines in the future by depending just on strong premixing. This paper reviews the current mainstream combustion technologies and their application progress. As a result, integrating various combustion technologies is an achievable route toward the creation of a new burner generation in the future.
- (3)
- To improve the overall compatibility of hydrogen-mixed gas turbines, retrofit measures involve not only the improvement of the combustor but also the optimization of the overall system of the gas turbine. The combination of novel high-temperature alloys and composite coatings is effective in preventing component failure caused by the deterioration of conventional materials because of the water vapor and high temperatures produced during hydrogen combustion. The manufacturing process increases the potential to produce high-performance alloys and composites, which improves the performance and longevity of gas turbines; therefore, material enhancement is a crucial element of gas turbine transformation. Furthermore, the hydrogen embrittlement issue must be taken into consideration by concentrating on the hydrogen-mixed ratios and work temperature of gas turbine operation, in addition to optimizing the material of the crucial components. Regular gas turbine purging not only reduces the risk of an explosion but also delays the hydrogen-induced component deterioration.
- (4)
- Although hydrogen energy has plenty of potential, the supply is still limited, and the need for energy conservation and emission reduction keeps growing, according to New Scientist. The utilization of natural gas with a 20% hydrogen mix, however, is entirely capable of satisfying energy demand and successfully lowering carbon emissions, according to the state of the art in hydrogen-fueled gas turbine technology. It is anticipated that the hydrogen energy sector will progressively grow to incorporate production, storage, transportation, and combustion for power generation as natural gas cogeneration systems and transportation pipeline networks continue to improve.
6.2. Future Research Directions and Recommendations
- (1)
- Development of Phased Retrofit Roadmaps: We recommend that turbine manufacturers and plant operators collaboratively establish standardized pathways for retrofitting existing natural gas fleets. This involves defining clear technical milestones—from control system adjustments for low hydrogen blends (e.g., <20%) to combustor hardware upgrades for high blends (e.g., >50%)—enabling asset owners to plan a cost-effective and risk-managed transition.
- (2)
- Establishment of Industry-Wide Material and Safety Protocols: We highlight the urgent need for coordinated industry efforts to develop and validate material testing standards under hydrogen-rich, high-temperature conditions, as well as unified safety and maintenance procedures for hydrogen-blended operations. This will ensure reliability, reduce certification costs, and accelerate market acceptance.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Nomenclature
| p′ | pressure oscillations | BFF | flashback through the core of the bulk flow |
| q′ | heat release oscillations | ||
| Greek symbols | DLE | dry low emission | |
| Φ | equivalent ratio | DLN | dry low NOx |
| Abbreviations | SCR | selective catalytic reduction | |
| NG | natural gas | KPIs | key performance indicators |
| GTCCs | gas turbine combined cycles | RQL | rich-burn/quick-quench/lean-burn |
| LPM | lean premixed combustion | LHV | low heating value |
| BLF | boundary layer flashback | CMC | ceramic matrix composite |
| CIVB | combustion-induced vortex breakdown | ODS | oxide-dispersion-strengthened |
| ppm | parts per million | ||
| TBCs | thermal barrier coatings | EBCs | environmental barrier coatings |
References
- Yu, H.; Wen, B.; Zahidi, I.; Chow, M.F.; Liang, D.; Madsen, D.Ø. The critical role of energy transition in addressing climate change at COP28. Results Eng. 2024, 22, 102324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colocci, A.; Gioia, E.; Casareale, C.; Marchetti, N.; Marincioni, F. The role of sustainable energy and climate action plans: Synergies with regional sustainable development strategies for a local 2030 agenda. Environ. Dev. 2023, 47, 100894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahbabi Saray, J.; Gharehghani, A.; Hosseinzadeh, D. Towards sustainable energy carriers: A solar and wind-based systems for green liquid hydrogen and ammonia production. Energy Convers. Manag. 2024, 304, 118215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibrahim Idriss, A.; Awalo Mohamed, A.; Abdi Atteye, H.; Ali Ahmed, R.; Abdoulkader Mohamed, O.; Cetin Akinci, T.; Ramadan, H.S. Sustainable pathways for hydrogen production: Metrics, trends, and strategies for a zero-carbon future. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2025, 73, 104124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamil, F.; Inayat, A.; Hussain, M.; Ghenai, C.; Shanableh, A.; Sarwer, A.; Shah, N.S.; Park, Y.-K. Green hydrogen production through a facile aqueous-phase reforming technique from waste biomass: A comprehensive review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 96, 126–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naseem, K.; Qin, F.; Khalid, F.; Suo, G.; Zahra, T.; Chen, Z.; Javed, Z. Essential parts of hydrogen economy: Hydrogen production, storage, transportation and application. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2025, 210, 115196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, D.-W.; Huang, J.-L.; Yu, D.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, X.-L. Development of low-carbon technologies in China’s integrated hydrogen supply and power system. Adv. Clim. Change Res. 2024, 15, 936–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.-L.; Zhang, Z.-Y.; Sethanan, K.; Tseng, M.-L. Multi-energy synergistic planning of distributed energy supply system: Wind-solar-hydrogen coupling energy supply. Renew. Energy 2024, 237, 121769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pivovar, B.; Rustagi, N.; Satyapal, S. Hydrogen at scale (H2@Scale): Key to a clean, economic, and sustainable energy system. Electrochem. Soc. Interface 2018, 27, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldmeer, J.; Catillaz, J. Hydrogen for Power Generation: Experience, Requirements, and Implications for Use in Gas Turbines; GEA34805; GE Ltd.: London, UK, 2025; p. 3. Available online: https://www.ge.com/gas-power/future-of-energy (accessed on 1 January 2026).
- Flebbe, S.M.; Tartsch, S.; Sattelmayer, T. Thermal runaway effect of the centerbody on boundary layer flashback in a swirl-stabilized gas turbine burner operated with hydrogen. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 61, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giannotta, A.; Cherubini, S.; De Palma, P. The effect of hydrogen enrichment on thermoacoustic instabilities in laminar conical premixed methane/air flames. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 37654–37665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, J.; Kim, M.; Hwang, J.; Kang, D.; Lee, W.; Kim, H.; Kim, D. Combustion instability characteristics via fuel nozzle modification in a hydrogen and natural gas Co-firing gas turbine combustor. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 79, 962–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karlis, E.; Liu, Y.; Hardalupas, Y.; Taylor, A.M.K.P. H2 enrichment of CH4 blends in lean premixed gas turbine combustion: An experimental study on effects on flame shape and thermoacoustic oscillation dynamics. Fuel 2019, 254, 115524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamadi, M.; Tahsini, A.M.; Tavazohi, R. Hydrogen addition impacts on flashback phenomenon in combustion chamber. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 67, 769–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, Y.; Nan, J.; Yang, L.; Li, J. The effect of hydrogen enrichment on the conical premixed methane–air flame response and thermoacoustic modes coupling. Combust. Flame 2024, 270, 113742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fritz, J.; Kro¨ner, M.; Sattelmayer, T. Flashback in a Swirl Burner with Cylindrical Premixing Zone. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2004, 126, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boretti, A. Combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) plants utilizing methane-hydrogen blends represent a significant element in Australia’s journey toward achieving net-zero emissions. Fuel 2025, 381, 133339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernandez, S.R.; Wang, Q.; McDonell, V.; Mansour, A.; Steinthorsson, E.; Hollon, B. Micro mixing fuel injectors for low emissions hydrogen combustion. In Proceedings of the Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, Berlin, Germany, 9–13 June 2008; Volume 43130, pp. 675–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pashchenko, D. Hydrogen-rich gas as a fuel for the gas turbines: A pathway to lower CO2 emission. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023, 173, 113117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tamang, S.; Park, H. An investigation on the thermal emission of hydrogen enrichment fuel in a gas turbine combustor. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 40071–40087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cappelletti, A.; Martelli, F.; Bianchi, E.; Trifoni, E. Numerical redesign of 100kw MGT combustor for 100% H2 fueling. Energy Procedia 2014, 45, 1412–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cappelletti, A.; Martelli, F. Investigation of a pure hydrogen fueled gas turbine burner. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 10513–10523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Zhao, L.; Qu, J.; Xiao, Y.; Deng, J.; Shu, C.-M. Minireview on the Leakage Ignition and Flame Propagation Characteristics of Hydrogen: Advances and Perspectives. Energy Fuels 2023, 37, 5653–5666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, L.; Luo, Z.; Wang, T.; Cheng, F.; Gao, S.; Liang, H. Effects of Initial Temperature on the Deflagration Characteristics and Flame Propagation Behaviors of CH4 and Its Blends with C2H6, C2H4, CO, H2. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 785–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Hong, X.; Chen, Y. Hydrogen-Blended Combustion Technology in Gas Turbine. South. Energy Constr. 2023, 10, 14–25. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colwell, J.D.; Korb, T.M.; Peck, R.E. Hot surface ignition of Jet-A fuel by conductive deposits. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2002, 29, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pers, H.; Poinsot, T.; Schuller, T. Effect of quenching on flashback of hydrogen-enriched laminar premixed flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2024, 40, 105725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kıymaz, T.B.; Böncü, E.; Güleryüz, D.; Karaca, M.; Yılmaz, B.; Allouis, C.; Gökalp, İ. Numerical investigations on flashback dynamics of premixed methane-hydrogen-air laminar flames. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 25022–25033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yahou, T.; Schuller, T.; Dawson, J.R. The Effect of Ignition Procedure on Flashback of Hydrogen-Enriched Flames. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2024, 146, 011023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sattelmayer, T.; Mayer, C.; Sangl, J. Interaction of flame flashback mechanisms in premixed hydrogen-air swirl flames. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2016, 138, 011503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boschek, E.; Griebel, P.; Jansohn, P. Fuel variability effects on turbulent, lean premixed flames at high pressures. In Proceedings of the Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, Montreal, Canada, 14–17 May 2007; Volume 47918, pp. 373–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emerson, B.; Patel, S.J.; Gubbi, S.; McKinney, R.G.; Wu, D.; Noble, D.R.; Lieuwen, T. Nonpremixed Approaches for Fuel Flexible, Low NOx Combustors in High-Efficiency Gas Turbines. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2025, 147, 011009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, U.L.; Almarzooq, Y.M.; Hardaya, A.; Hay, M.K.; Kulatilaka, W.D.; Petersen, E.L. Laminar Flame Speed Measurements of a NH3/H2/N2 Natural Gas Surrogate at Elevated Pressures. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2026, 148, 061004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yovino, L.; Safdari, A.; Kim, G.; Rahman, R.K.; Vasu, S.; Winquist, M.; Subbaraman, G.; Vega, J.; Steele, R. Laminar Burning Speed Measurements of Ammonia-Hydrogen Mixtures at Elevated Pressures for Gas-Turbine Applications. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2026, 148, 061005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajagopalan, H.P.; Cole, R.; Wu, D.; Emerson, B.; Lieuwen, T.C. Turbulent Burning Velocity of High Hydrogen Flames. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2025, 147, 061016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahin, T.T.; Hodge, A.J.; Murdock, B.K.; Koenig, K.C.; Moehring, E.K.; Gejji, R.M.; Lucht, R.P.; Slabaugh, C.D. Structure of High-Pressure Premixed Ammonia, Hydrogen, and Methane Flames With 100 kHz OH-PLIF Measurements. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2025, 147, 121018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, H.; Wang, J.; Cai, X.; Dai, H.; Bian, Z.; Huang, Z. Flame structure, turbulent burning velocity and its unified scaling for lean syngas/air turbulent expanding flames. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 25699–25711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heeger, C.; Gordon, R.L.; Tummers, M.J.; Sattelmayer, T.; Dreizler, A. Experimental analysis of flashback in lean premixed swirling flames: Upstream flame propagation. Exp. Fluids 2010, 49, 853–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dam, B.; Love, N.; Choudhuri, A. Flashback propensity of syngas fuels. Fuel 2011, 90, 618–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pugh, D.; Bowen, P.; Navaratne, R.; Goktepe, B.; Giles, A.; Valera Medina, A.; Morris, S.; Vivoli, R. Influence of Variable Swirl on Emissions in a Non-Premixed Fuel-Flexible Burner at Elevated Ambient Conditions. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2024, 146, 061006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De, A.; Acharya, S. Dynamics of upstream flame propagation in a hydrogen-enriched premixed flame. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 17294–17309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Yang, V. Dynamics and stability of lean-premixed swirl-stabilized combustion. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2009, 35, 293–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poinsot, T. Prediction and control of combustion instabilities in real engines. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2017, 36, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, J.; Hu, B.; Zeng, Z.; Fu, J.; Zhang, B. A Review on Combustion Instability of Hydrogen-Enriched Marine Gas Turbines. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13, 2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durox, D.; Schuller, T.; Noiray, N.; Birbaud, A.L.; Candel, S. Rayleigh criterion and acoustic energy balance in unconfined self-sustained oscillating flames. Combust. Flame 2009, 156, 106–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rayleigh, L. The explanation of certain acoustical phenomena. Nature 1878, 18, 319–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dinu, C.; Cican, G.; Osman, S.; Secareanu, R. Performance and Emissions of Camelina Biodiesel–Jet A Blends in a Micro-Gas Turbine as a Sustainable Pathway for Aviation. Fire 2025, 8, 442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, H.; Liu, X.; Ge, B. Study on the Impact of Fuel Staging on Flame Structure and Thermoacoustic Oscillation in a Diesel Multi-Nozzle Combustor. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2026, 148, 051018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicoud, F.; Poinsot, T. Thermoacoustic instabilities: Should the Rayleigh criterion be extended to include entropy changes? Combust. Flame 2005, 142, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrews, G.E. Ultra-low nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions combustion in gas turbine systems. In Modern Gas Turbine Systems; Jansohn, P., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2013; Volume 16, pp. 715–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beita, J.; Talibi, M.; Sadasivuni, S.; Balachandran, R. Thermoacoustic instability considerations for high hydrogen combustion in lean premixed gas Turbine combustors: A review. Hydrogen 2021, 2, 33–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, S.; Zhang, M. Effect of Spray-Wall Interaction on Thermoacoustic Instability Prediction by Flame Transfer Function and the Convective Time Delay Method. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2021, 143, 111003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- An, Q.; Steinberg, A.M.; Jella, S.; Bourque, G.; Füri, M. Early Warning Signs of Imminent Thermoacoustic Oscillations Through Critical Slowing Down. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2019, 141, 054501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polifke, W.; Silva, C.F.; Guo, S. Efficient Robust Design for Thermoacoustic Instability Analysis: A Gaussian Process Approach. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2020, 142, 031026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, S.; Silva, C.F.; Polifke, W. Reliable Calculation of Thermoacoustic Instability Risk Using an Imperfect Surrogate Model. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2021, 143, 011010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ånestad, A.; Æsøy, E.; Dawson, J.R.; Worth, N.A. Mitigating thermoacoustic instabilities in premixed hydrogen flames using axial staging. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2024, 40, 105430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaw, S.; Van Heyst, B. Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) emissions as an indicator for sustainability. Environ. Sustain. Indic. 2022, 15, 100188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lieuwen, T.; Yang, V.; Yetter, R. Synthesis Gas Combustion: Fundamentals and Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Avila Jimenez, C.D.; Cole, R.; Noble, D.R.; Steele, R.; Wu, D.; Emerson, B.; Lieuwen, T. Toward the Development of an NH3-RRQL System—Part II: Effects of the Primary Combustion Zone Length and Secondary Stage Number of Holes on Stability and Emissions. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2026, 148, 071001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cecere, D.; Giacomazzi, E.; Di Nardo, A.; Calchetti, G. Gas turbine combustion technologies for hydrogen blends. Energies 2023, 16, 6829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elkaee, S.; Moghaddam, L.; Alinaghipour, B. A review of NH3-SCR using nitrogen-doped carbon catalysts for NOx emission control. Mater. Today Sustain. 2024, 28, 101016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Sun, S.; Geng, K.; Yan, P.; Feng, D.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, W. Synergistic activation of reburned char for ultra-low NOx emissions using flue gas recirculation and natural gas in a10 kW furnace. J. Environ. Manag. 2025, 373, 123614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cellek, M.S.; Pınarbaşı, A. Investigations on performance and emission characteristics of an industrial low swirl burner while burning natural gas, methane, hydrogen-enriched natural gas and hydrogen as fuels. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 1194–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, H.; Smallwood, G.J.; Liu, F.; Ju, Y.; Gülder, Ö.L. The effect of hydrogen addition on flammability limit and NOx emission in ultra-lean counterflow CH4/air premixed flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2005, 30, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldmeer, J. Power to gas: Hydrogen for power generation Fuel Flexible Gas Turbines as Enablers for a Low or Reduced Carbon Energy Ecosystem. GE Power 2019, GEA33861, 7–9. Available online: https://pdf4pro.com/view/power-to-gas-hydrogen-for-power-generation-5b6079.html (accessed on 1 January 2026).
- York, W.D.; Simons, D.W.; Fu, Y. Operational flexibility of GE’s F-class gas turbines with the DLN2.6+ combustion system. In Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2018: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, Oslo, Norway, 11–15 June 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nemitallah, M.A.; Haque, M.A.; Hussain, M.; Abdelhafez, A.; Habib, M.A. Stratified and hydrogen combustion techniques for higher turndown and lower emissions in gas turbines. J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2022, 144, 020801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skabelund, B.B.; Jenkins, C.D.; Stechel, E.B.; Milcarek, R.J. Thermodynamic and emission analysis of a hydrogen/methane fueled gas turbine. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2023, 19, 100394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Brown, P.; Diakunchak, I.; Gulati, A.; Lenze, M.; Koestlin, B. Advanced gas turbine combustion system development for high hydrogen fuels. In Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2007: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, Montreal, Canada, 14–17 May 2007; pp. 1085–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khosravy el_Hossaini, M. Review of the new combustion technologies in modern gas turbines. In Progress in Gas Turbine Performance; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2013; pp. 953–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldmeer, J.; York, W.; Glaser, P. Fuel and combustion system capabilities of GE’s F and HA class gas turbines. In Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2017: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, Charlotte, NC, USA, 26–30 June 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nose, M.; Kawakami, T.; Araki, H.; Senba, N.; Tanimura, S. Hydrogen-fired gas turbine targeting realization of CO2-free society. Mitsubishi Heavy Ind. Tech. Rev. 2018, 55, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Nose, M.; Kawakami, T.; Nakamura, S.; Kuroki, H.; Kataoka, M.; Yuri, M. Development of hydrogen/ammonia firing gas turbine for decarbonized society. Mitsubishi Heavy Ind. Tech. Rev. 2021, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Todd, D.; Battista, R. Demonstrated applicability of hydrogen fuel for gas turbines. In Proceedings of the Gasification 4 the Future, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 11–13 April 2000; pp. 741–748. [Google Scholar]
- Kawasaki Gas Turbine Europe GmbH. Available online: https://www.kawasaki-gasturbine.de/en/products/turbine-generator-sets/hydrogen-technology (accessed on 15 December 2025).
- Clean Hydrogen Partnership. Clean Hydrogen Joint Undertaking, Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda 2021–2027, Annex to GB decision no. CleanHydrogen-GB-2022-02. Available online: https://www.clean-hydrogen.europa.eu (accessed on 23 August 2023).
- Berg, A.; Magnusson, R. Fleet Experience of SGT-600 (24 MW) DLE Gas Turbine with Over 60% H2 in Natural Gas. In Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2023: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, Boston, MA, USA, 26–30 June 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindman, O.; Andersson, M.; Bonaldo, A.; Larsson, A.; Janczewski, J.; Persson, M. SGT-750 fuel flexibility: Engine and rig tests. In Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2017: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, Charlotte, NC, USA, 26–30 June 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, J.; Rajasegar, R.; Lee, W.; Lee, T.; Yoo, J. Hydrogen enhancement on a mesoscale swirl stabilized burner array. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 23906–23915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Landry-Blais, A.; Sivić, S.; Picard, M. Micro-mixing combustion for highly recuperated gas turbines: Effects of inlet temperature and fuel composition on combustion stability and NOx emissions. In Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2022: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 13–17 June 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Shao, W.; Liu, C.; Bi, X.; Liu, Y.; Xiao, Y. Numerical study of a high-hydrogen micromix model burner using flamelet-generated manifold. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 20750–20764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tekin, N.; Horikawa, A.; Ashikaga, M.; Funke, H. Hydrogenroad of kawasaki-development of innovative hydrogen combustion systems for industrial. In Proceedings of the Gas Turbines in a Carbon-Neutral Society 10th International Gas Turbine Conference, Virtual, 11–15 October 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Tekin, N.; Ashikaga, M.; Horikawa, A.; Funke, H. Enhancement of fuel flexibility of industrial gas turbines by development of innovative hydrogen combustion systems. Gas Energy 2018, 2, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, D. Review on the development trend of hydrogen gas turbine combustion technology. J. Korean Soc. Combust. 2019, 24, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayed, A.H.; Kusterer, K.; Funke, H.-W.; Keinz, J.; Bohn, D. CFD based exploration of the dry-low-NOx hydrogen micromix combustion technology at increased energy densities. Propuls. Power Res. 2017, 6, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, D.; Joo, S.; Yoon, Y. Effects of fuel line acoustics on the self-excited combustion instability mode transition with hydrogen-enriched laboratory-scale partially premixed combustor. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 19956–19964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Qian, W.; Zhu, M.; Li, S. Kinetics modeling on NOx emissions of a syngas turbine combustor using rich-burn, quick-mix, lean-burn combustion method. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2020, 142, 021005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karim, H.; Natarajan, J.; Narra, V.; Cai, J.; Rao, S.; Kegley, J.; Citeno, J. Staged combustion system for improved emissions operability and flexibility for 7HA class heavy duty gas turbine engine. In Proceedings of the Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, Charlotte, NC, USA, 26–30 June 2017; ASME: New York, NY, USA, 2017; p. V04AT04A062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pennell, D.A.; Bothien, M.R.; Ciani, A.; Granet, V.; Singla, G.; Thorpe, S.; Wickstroem, A.; Oumejjoud, K.; Yaquinto, M. An introduction to the Ansaldo GT36 constant pressure sequential combustor. In Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2017: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, Charlotte, NC, USA, 26–30 June 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turbines, H.G. In The Path Toward a Zero-Carbon Gas Turbine. 2020. Available online: https://etn.global/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Gas-turbines-an-enabling-technology-for-a-carbon-neutral-society.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2026).
- Bothien, M.R.; Ciani, A.; Wood, J.P.; Fruechtel, G. Toward decarbonized power generation with gas turbines by using sequential combustion for burning hydrogen. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2019, 141, 121013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hughes, M.J.; Berry, J.; Weber, J.A. Advanced Multi-Tube Mixer Combustion for 65% Efficiency (Final Report); US Department of Energy: Washington, DC, USA, 2021. [CrossRef]
- Kumuk, O. Colorless distributed combustion effects on hydrogen-enriched methane fuels combustion in a laboratory-scale combustor. Fuel 2025, 381, 133590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Sun, X.; Sethi, V.; Nalianda, D.; Li, Y.-G.; Wang, L. Review of modern low emissions combustion technologies for aero gas turbine engines. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2017, 94, 12–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prakash, A. Prediction of NOx emissions for an RQL aero-engine combustor using a stirred reactor modelling approach. In Proceedings of the 52nd AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 25–27 July 2016; p. AIAA 2016-4501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Göke, S.; Füri, M.; Bourque, G.; Bobusch, B.; Göckeler, K.; Krüger, O.; Schimek, S.; Terhaar, S.; Paschereit, C.O. Influence of steam dilution on the combustion of natural gas and hydrogen in premixed and rich-quench-lean combustors. Fuel Process. Technol. 2013, 107, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aydın, H.; Turan, O.; Karakoç, T.H.; Midilli, A. Sustainability assessment of PW6000 turbofan engine: An exergetic approach. Int. J. Exergy 2014, 14, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Recio Balmaseda, S.; Karpowski, T.J.P.; Nicolai, H.; Koob, P.; Hasse, C.; Greifenstein, M.; Dreizler, A. Numerical Investigation of Effusion Cooling Air Influence on the CO Emissions for a Single-Sector Aero-Engine Model Combustor. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2024, 146, 121014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsuyama, R.; Kobayashi, M.; Ogata, H.; Horikawa, A.; Kinoshita, Y. Development of a lean staged combustor for small aero-engines. In ASME Turbo Expo 2012: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition; ASME: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Zeng, Z.; Guo, K. Numerical analysis on hydrogen swirl combustion and flow characteristics of a micro gas turbine combustor with axial air/fuel staged technology. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2023, 219, 119460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meziane, S.; Bentebbiche, A. Numerical study of blended fuel natural gas-hydrogen combustion in rich/quench/lean combustor of a micro gas turbine. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 15610–15621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kobayashi, H.; Hayakawa, A.; Somarathne, K.D.; Kunkuma, A.; Okafor, E.C. Science and technology of ammonia combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2019, 37, 109–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McMillan, R.; Martin, P.; Noden, R.; Welch, M. Gas Fuel Flexibility in a Dry Low Emissions Combustion System; Demag Delaval Industrial Turbomachinery Ltd.: Mumbai, India, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Giacomazzi, E.; Messina, G. Hydrogen and the fuel-flexibility dilemma in gas turbines. Energ. Ambiente Innov. ENEA Stockh. Swed. 2021, 1, 125–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakan, E.; Mack, D.E.; Mauer, G.; Vaßen, R.; Lamon, J.; Padture, N.P. High-temperature materials for power generation in gas turbines. In Advanced Ceramics for Energy Conversion and Storage; Guillon, O., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 3–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaikh, A.S. Development of a γ’ Precipitation Hardening Ni-Base Superalloy for Additive Manufacturing. Master’s Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dreizler, A.; Böhm, B. Advanced laser diagnostics for an improved understanding of premixed flame-wall interactions. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2015, 35, 37–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gruber, A.; Sankaran, R.; Hawkes, E.R.; Chen, J.H. Turbulent flame–wall interaction: A direct numerical simulation study. J. Fluid Mech. 2010, 658, 5–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiesa, P.; Lozza, G.G.; Mazzocchi, L. Using hydrogen as gas turbine fuel. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2003, 127, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stefan, E.; Talic, B.; Larring, Y.; Gruber, A.; Peters, T.A. Materials challenges in hydrogen-fuelled gas turbines. Int. Mater. Rev. 2022, 67, 461–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clarke, D.R.; Oechsner, M.; Padture, N.P. Thermal-barrier coatings for more efficient gas-turbine engines. MRS Bull. 2012, 37, 891–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pimentel, G.; Capdevila, C.; Bartolomé, M.; Chao, J.; Serrano, M.; García-Junceda, A.; Campos, M.; Torralba, J.; Aldazabal, J. Advanced FeCrAl ODS steels for high-temperature structural applications in energy generation systems. Rev. De Metal. 2012, 48, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, B.; Zhou, X.; Chai, Y. Mechanical properties of SiCf/SiC composites with PyC and the BN interface. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 7185–7190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhivya, S. 210 MW turbo generator’s hydrogen gas cooling system online monitoring and controlling using node red flow based IoT. Malaya J. Mat. 2019, 8, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, R.; Kumar, A. Assessment of impact of hydrogen cooled generator on power system loadability enhancement. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Energy, Power and Environment: Towards Sustainable Growth (ICEPE), Shillong, India, 12–13 June 2015; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagano, S.; Kitajima, T.; Yoshida, K.; Kazao, Y.; Kabata, Y.; Murata, D.; Nagakura, K. Development of world’s largest hydrogen-cooled turbine generator. In Proceedings of the IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, Chicago, IL, USA, 21–25 July 2002; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 657–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sieverts, A. Absorption of gases by metals. Jpn. Inst. Met. 1929, 13, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- An, T.; Zhang, S.; Feng, M.; Luo, B.; Zheng, S.; Chen, L.; Zhang, L. Synergistic action of hydrogen gas and weld defects on fracture toughness of X80 pipeline steel. Int. J. Fatigue 2019, 120, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, R.; Yuan, C.; Liu, C.; Wang, C.; Xu, X.; Zhang, J. Experimental and molecular dynamics study of the hydrogen embrittlement behavior of X52 steel: Analysis of abnormal hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 83, 987–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Zhang, J.; Liu, C.; Hu, Q.; Zhang, R.; Xu, X.; Yang, H.; Ning, Y.; Li, Y. Study on hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of X80 steel through in-situ gaseous hydrogen permeation and slow strain rate tensile tests. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 243–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- San Marchi, C.W.; Somerday, B.P. Technical Reference for Hydrogen Compatibility of Materials; Sandia National Laboratories (SNL): Albuquerque, NM, USA; Livermore, CA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balyts’kyi, A.I.; Kvasnyts’ka, Y.H.; Ivas’kevich, L.M.; Myal’nitsa, H.P. Corrosion- and hydrogen-resistance of heat-resistant blade Nickel-Cobalt alloys. Mater. Sci. 2018, 54, 230–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molière, M. The fuel flexibility of gas turbines: A review and retrospective outlook. Energies 2023, 16, 3962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 19880-1; Gaseous Hydrogen Fuelling Stations. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020.
- ASME B31; Hydrogen Piping and Pipelines. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers: New York, NY, USA, 2023.
- NFPA 2; Hydrogen Technologies Code. National Fire Protection Association: Quincy, MA, USA, 2023.
- ISO 16110-1; Hydrogen Generators Using Fuel Processing Technologies—Part 1: Safety. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007.
- IGEM/SR/25 Edition 2; Hazardous Area Classification of Natural Gas Installations. Institution of Gas Engineers and Managers: Kegworth, UK, 2010.
- EN IEC 60079-10-1; Explosive Atmospheres–Part 10-1: Classification of Areas–Explosive Gas Atmospheres. European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2021.
- API Std 521; Pressure-Relieving and Depressuring Systems, Seventh Edition, Includes Errata 1. American Petroleum Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2020.
- NFPA 68; Standard on Explosion Protection by Deflagration Venting. National Fire Protection Association: Quincy, MA, USA, 2023.
- IEC 61511; Functional Safety–Safety Instrumented Systems for the Process Industry Sector–ALL PARTS. International Electrotechnical Commission: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016.
- ISO 22734-1; Hydrogen Generators Using Water Electrolysis—Part 1: Safety. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2025.
- EIGA IGC Doc 121/14; Hydrogen Pipeline Systems. European Industrial Gases Association: Brussels, Belgium, 2014.
- Hydrogen Council. Path to Hydrogen Competitiveness: A Cost Perspective; Hydrogen Council: Brussels, Belgium, 2020. [Google Scholar]

















| Characteristics of Combustion | H2 [24] | CH4 [25] | C3H8 [26] | Jet-A [27] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molecular weight [g/mol] | 2.016 | 16.04 | 44.097 | ~168 |
| Density [kg/m3] | 0.0838 | 0.6512 | 1.87 | 775–840 |
| Self-ignition temperature T [K] | 845~858 | 813–905 | 760–766 | 483 |
| Minimum ignition energy [MJ] | 0.02 | 0.29–0.33 | 0.26–0.305 | 20 |
| Flammability range in air [vol%] | 4–75 | 5–15 | 2.1–10 | 0.6–7 |
| Flammability range [Φ] | 0.1–7.1 | 0.4–1.6 | 0.56–2.7 | - |
| Adiabatic flame temperature [K] | 2318–2400 | 2158–2226 | 2198–2267 | 2366 |
| Lower heating value [MJ/m3] | 10.78 | 35.8 | 91.21 | - |
| Minimum quenching distance [mm] | 0.6 | 2.5 | 2.0 | - |
| Lower wobbe index [MJ/m3] | 40.7 | 47.94 | 73.3 | - |
| Hydrogen Property | Characteristic | Corresponding Technical | Primary Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Challenge | |||
| High laminar flame speed | ~7–10 × CH4 | Flashback risk | Flame speed exceeds flow velocity in premixing zone, leading to upstream propagation |
| High adiabatic flame temperature | ~2318–2400 K | Increased NOx emissions & thermal stress | Promotes thermal NOx formation via Zeldovich mechanism; raises wall temperature |
| Low ignition energy | 0.02 MJ | Auto-ignition & safety hazards | Premature ignition in premixing ducts; increased explosion risk during handling |
| Wide flammability range | 4–75 vol% in air | Combustion instability & safety control | Difficulty in maintaining stable lean combustion; requires precise fuel–air ratio control |
| Low density & Wobbe index | 0.0838 kg/m3; 40.7 MJ/m3 | Fuel delivery & injector redesign | Requires higher volumetric flow rates and modified fuel supply systems |
| High diffusivity & small molecular size | - | Hydrogen embrittlement | Permeation into materials causing degradation; leakage risks in seals and pipelines |
| High reactivity & diffusivity | - | Thermoacoustic oscillations | Coupling between heat release and pressure fluctuations; shifts instability regimes |
| KPI | Unit | 2020 | 2024 | 2030 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H2 fuel content | % by mass | 0–5 | 0–23 | 0–100 |
| % by volume | 0–30 | 0–70 | 0–100 | |
| NOx emissions | ppmv at 15% O2 dry | <25 at 30% vol. H2 | <25 at 70% vol. H2 | <25 at 100% vol. H2 |
| mmg/MJfuel | <31 at 30% vol. H2 | <29 at 70% vol. H2 | <24 at 100% vol. H2 | |
| Max. H2 content at start-up | % by mass | 0.7 | 3 | 100 |
| % by volume | 5 | 20 | 100 | |
| Max. H2 content at start-up | % points | 10 at 30% vol. H2 | 10 at 70% vol. H2 | 10 at 100% vol. H2 |
| Min. ramp rate | % load/minute | 10 at 30% vol. H2 | 10 at 70% vol. H2 | 10 at 100% vol. H2 |
| H2-accepted fluctuations | % by mass/minute | ±1.4 | ±2.21 | ±5.11 |
| % by volume/minute | ±10 | ±15 | ±30 |
| - | Characteristics of Used Fuel | Purposes | Purging Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional gas turbine | Narrower flammability range | Removing residual fuel and condensate; optimizing the combustion process | Low safety requirements; at a lower pressure |
| Hydrogen-fueled gas turbines | Flammable and explosive; high diffusibility | Pushing hydrogen and natural gas out of the circuit; preventing accidental combustion | Higher safety requirements; Higher operating pressure and flow rate |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Xia, Y.; Guan, X.; Zhou, X.; Xu, X.; Cheng, Z.; Li, Y. Research Status and Technical Progress of Hydrogen-Fueled Gas Turbine. Energies 2026, 19, 1312. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19051312
Xia Y, Guan X, Zhou X, Xu X, Cheng Z, Li Y. Research Status and Technical Progress of Hydrogen-Fueled Gas Turbine. Energies. 2026; 19(5):1312. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19051312
Chicago/Turabian StyleXia, Yongfang, Xiaohu Guan, Xiangyang Zhou, Xi Xu, Zude Cheng, and Yafei Li. 2026. "Research Status and Technical Progress of Hydrogen-Fueled Gas Turbine" Energies 19, no. 5: 1312. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19051312
APA StyleXia, Y., Guan, X., Zhou, X., Xu, X., Cheng, Z., & Li, Y. (2026). Research Status and Technical Progress of Hydrogen-Fueled Gas Turbine. Energies, 19(5), 1312. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19051312

