Correction: Silva et al. Multiple Dimensions of Energy Efficiency of Recycled Concrete: A Systematic Review. Energies 2024, 17, 3809

There was an error in the original publication [1]. PRISMA was used to identify keywords; however, this does not fully align with how PRISMA is typically used.

The following correction has been made to Section 1 Introduction, Paragraph 11:

To answer these guiding questions, the following methodology used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), which is a useful tool for ensuring that all the information recommended by its guidelines is captured during the organization and execution of systematic reviews, in addition to improving their reporting [36]; similar usage has been observed in Stavropoulou et al. [37], Ciccozzi et al. [38], and Marco-Lajara et al. [39]. Using the PRISMA method, combined with VosViewer version 1.6.20, Mendeley v1.19.8, and GPS Visualizer software, it was possible to organize, evaluate, analyze, and systematize the most current research from 2019 to 2024, as well as the most relevant articles on the subject. Therefore, by outlining a roadmap for future research, this article will be able to guide academics and professionals in carrying out more in-depth and comprehensive studies that advance knowledge, foster innovation, and promote sustainable practices in concrete construction.

In addition, the caption of Figure 1 was changed as follows:

Figure 1. Synthesis of bibliometric and bibliographic analysis of research into recycled concrete.

Lastly, Figure 10 was updated to the following:

The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. These corrections were approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.