Harnessing Blockchain and IoT for Carbon Credit Exchange to Achieve Pollution Reduction Goals
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Towards Sustainable Solutions: Blockchain and IoT in Combatting Climate Change
1.2. Benefits of Blockchain and IoT in Carbon Credit Markets
- Enhanced transparency and traceability: Blockchain’s decentralized and transparent nature allows for the tracking of carbon credit creation, transfer, and retirement, eliminating the risk of double counting and ensuring accurate accounting [1].
- Increased accountability: Blockchain technology provides an auditable trail of all carbon credit transactions, holding participants accountable for their actions and fostering greater trust in the market [6].
- Real-time monitoring and verification: IoT devices, integrated with blockchain, can collect real-time data on emissions, enabling near-instantaneous verification of emission reduction claims [7].
- Improved efficiency and cost reduction: Blockchain can streamline the carbon credit trading process, reducing administrative costs and increasing efficiency [8].
1.3. Real-World Applications and Case Studies
- ClimateChain: A consortium of organizations working to develop a blockchain-based platform for carbon credit trading, aiming to improve transparency and efficiency [11].
- Veridium: A blockchain-based platform that verifies and tracks carbon emissions data from IoT devices, ensuring authenticity and preventing fraud [12].
- Climate Collective: A blockchain-based platform that connects individuals and businesses with carbon offset projects, empowering them to participate in climate action [2].
1.4. Addressing Existing Challenges
- Lack of transparency: The complex nature of carbon credit verification and trading often leads to a lack of transparency, making it difficult to track the validity and authenticity of credits.
- Inefficient processes: Manual verification processes and fragmented data systems contribute to inefficiencies and high transaction costs.
- Susceptibility to fraud: The absence of a robust system for tracking and verifying credits makes the market susceptible to fraud and double counting.
1.4.1. Blockchain (B)
- Offers a decentralized and immutable ledger (), ensuring secure and transparent record keeping of carbon credits.
- Facilitates peer-to-peer trading (), bypassing intermediaries and reducing costs.
- Enables automatic verification () of carbon credits through smart contracts, eliminating human error and fraud.
1.4.2. IoT (I)
- Provides real-time data () on carbon emissions from various sources, enabling accurate measurement and monitoring.
- Facilitates direct integration () of emission data into the blockchain, enhancing transparency and accountability.
- Improved transparency: Blockchain’s immutable ledger () and IoT’s real-time data () provide a clear and auditable record of carbon credit transactions.
- Enhanced efficiency: Smart contracts () and automated processes streamline trading and verification, reducing transaction costs and time.
- Reduced fraud: The decentralized nature of blockchain () and the integration of real-time data () effectively minimize fraud and double counting.
- Standardized protocols: Developing consistent data standards and protocols for integrating IoT data () into blockchain platforms ().
- Scalability and interoperability: Ensuring the scalability and interoperability of blockchain platforms () to handle large-scale carbon credit transactions.
- Regulatory frameworks: Establishing clear regulatory frameworks to govern the use of blockchain and IoT () in the carbon credit market [13].
2. Related Work
3. Existing Literature
3.1. Blockchain for Carbon Credit Tracking
3.2. Carbon Credit Verification and Certification
3.3. Carbon Credit Registry and Management
3.4. Research Gaps
3.4.1. Integration with Existing Carbon Credit Systems
3.4.2. Smart Contracts for Carbon Credit Transactions
3.4.3. Incentivization Mechanisms
3.4.4. Energy Efficiency Considerations
3.4.5. Regulatory and Policy Implications
4. Proposed Carbon Trading Framework
4.1. Data Collection and Transmission
- Energy consumption: Measuring power consumption using sensors like smart meters allows us to estimate the energy used for specific operations. These data can be represented using the formula:
- Emission levels: Sensors such as gas analyzers and infrared cameras detect and quantify the concentration of pollutants emitted. For example, measuring the concentration of emissions from a power plant can be expressed as:
- Process variables: Parameters like temperature, pressure, and flow rate can be monitored using temperature sensors, pressure sensors, and flow meters. These variables influence the efficiency of processes and thus indirectly contribute to emissions. These data are then securely transmitted to a central platform using communication protocols like LoRaWAN, NB-IoT, or Wi-Fi [22].
4.2. Data Analysis and Insights
- Identify emission hotspots: By analyzing data from multiple sensors across a large geographical area, we can pinpoint locations with higher-than-average emissions, allowing for targeted interventions.
- Optimize processes: Correlation analysis between process variables and emission levels can identify areas for improvement, leading to reduced energy consumption and emissions. For instance, by optimizing the combustion process in a furnace, we can lower emissions [23].
- Predict future emissions: Using predictive models, we can anticipate potential peaks in emissions based on historical data and current trends. This proactive approach allows for timely adjustments and prevents exceeding emission limits.
4.3. Benefits of IoT in Emissions Monitoring
- Real-time monitoring: Continuous data collection provides a detailed understanding of emission patterns in real time, enabling immediate action in case of abnormal spikes.
- Enhanced accuracy: Data collection from numerous sensors across various locations provides a comprehensive and accurate picture of emissions compared to traditional methods like manual sampling.
- Improved efficiency: Analyzing data and identifying optimization opportunities leads to reduced energy consumption and emissions, contributing to cost savings and environmental sustainability.
- Remote monitoring: IoT solutions allow for remote monitoring and management of emission sources, reducing the need for on-site inspections and improving efficiency.
4.3.1. Carbon Credit Calculation and Issuance
4.3.2. Blockchain-Enabled Carbon Credit Exchange
4.4. Benefits of the Platform
- Enhanced transparency and accountability: The platform leverages the transparency and immutability of blockchain technology to provide a detailed audit trail of carbon credit transactions. All transactions, including issuance, transfer, and retirement, are recorded on the blockchain, ensuring accountability and reducing the risk of fraud.
- Accurate carbon emissions tracking: IoT devices provide real-time and reliable data on carbon emissions, reducing the reliance on self-reporting and enhancing data integrity. The automated data collection and analysis processes minimize the potential for human error and provide verifiable evidence of emission reductions.
- Increased efficiency and liquidity: The platform facilitates seamless trading of carbon credits through a decentralized digital marketplace. The blockchain-based exchange eliminates intermediaries, reduces transaction costs, and enhances liquidity, making the carbon credit exchange process more efficient.
- Empowerment for climate action: By providing a transparent and accessible platform, organizations and individuals are empowered to actively participate in carbon trading. This incentivizes emission reduction initiatives, promotes environmentally responsible practices, and supports the development of a carbon-neutral economy.
5. Proposed Use Case
- Consumption (kWh): This column lists ranges of electricity consumption in kilowatt-hours.
- Carbon emissions (kg CO2e): This column converts consumption into carbon emissions using an emission factor of 0.6 kg CO2e per kWh.
- Reward (USD): This column specifies the monetary rewards for consumption within certain ranges.
- Penalty (USD): This column specifies the monetary penalties for consumption exceeding 1000 kWh.
- Emission factor (EF): The table uses an EF of 0.6 kg CO2e/kWh to convert electricity consumption into carbon emissions.
- Rewards: Monetary incentives are provided to consumers who reduce their electricity consumption relative to a predefined baseline.
- Penalties: Monetary charges are applied to consumers who exceed a consumption threshold of 1000 kWh.
- Range 0–100 kWh: produces 0–60 kg CO2e.
- Range 101–200 kWh: produces 61–120 kg CO2e.
- Range 201–300 kWh: produces 121–180 kg CO2e.
- Range 301–400 kWh: produces 181–240 kg CO2e.
- Range 401–500 kWh: produces 241–300 kg CO2e.
- Range 501–600 kWh: produces 301–360 kg CO2e.
- Range 601–700 kWh: produces 361–420 kg CO2e.
- Range 701–800 kWh: produces 421–480 kg CO2e.
- Range 801–900 kWh: produces 481–540 kg CO2e.
- Range 901–1000 kWh: produces 541–600 kg CO2e.
- Above 1000 kWh: produces more than 600 kg CO2e.
Reward System
6. Experimental Design
6.1. Setup of Experimental and Control Groups
- Experimental group: This group utilizes the blockchain and IoT sensor system for real-time monitoring of carbon emissions, which includes the implementation of smart contracts for managing carbon credits.
- Control group: This group operates without the blockchain system, relying instead on traditional methods for carbon emission monitoring and management, such as manual data collection and processing.
6.2. Exclusion of Interference from Other Factors
- Random assignment: Participants are randomly assigned to either the experimental or control group to eliminate selection bias.
- Environmental control: Both groups are monitored within a similar environment regarding external factors such as temperature, industrial activity, and business operating times.
- Standardized data collection protocols: The data collection methods are standardized across both groups to ensure consistency in emissions measurement.
6.3. Experimental Subjects and Scope of the Experiment
6.3.1. Experimental Subjects
6.3.2. Scope of the Experiment
- Emission data accuracy;
- Time taken for processing transactions related to carbon credits;
- Overall system efficiency and scalability.
7. Experimental Results
- IoT sensors: Devices deployed to measure real-time carbon emissions from various sources.
- Blockchain network: A decentralized ledger that records emission data, transactions, and smart contract executions.
- Smart contracts: Automated contracts that execute predefined rules for tariff, reward, and penalty calculations based on emission data.
- User interface: A web or mobile application for stakeholders to interact with the system.
7.1. Experimental Results Analysis
7.1.1. Data Accuracy
7.1.2. Smart Contract Performance
7.1.3. System Efficiency and Scalability
7.2. Developed Trading Web-Based Application
- Increased efficiency: By removing intermediaries and automating processes, the platform significantly reduces transaction costs, making energy trading more accessible and affordable.
- Enhanced transparency: Blockchain technology ensures a transparent and auditable record of all transactions, fostering trust and accountability within the energy ecosystem.
- Greater accessibility: The platform empowers individuals and businesses to participate in the energy market, fostering a more decentralized and equitable energy trading system.
- Sustainable growth: By promoting peer-to-peer energy exchange and incentivizing renewable energy production, the platform contributes to a cleaner and more sustainable energy future.
8. Conclusions
- Increased transparency: The immutable nature of blockchain ensures that all transactions related to carbon credits are recorded and open for scrutiny, eliminating opacity and fostering accountability.
- Enhanced security: Blockchain’s decentralized architecture makes it virtually tamper-proof, preventing unauthorized access and ensuring the integrity of carbon trading data.
- Improved efficiency: Automated processes and smart contracts streamline carbon credit trading, reducing transaction costs and expediting settlement times.
- Global reach: The decentralized nature of blockchain facilitates global participation in carbon trading, allowing for the creation of a truly open and inclusive marketplace.
- Standardization: Establishing common standards for data collection, carbon accounting, and carbon credit verification is crucial to ensure interoperability and comparability across different platforms.
- Regulation: Governments and regulatory bodies must develop clear guidelines and policies to govern blockchain-based carbon trading, ensuring compliance and protecting consumer interests.
- Equity: Carbon credit trading mechanisms must be designed to ensure that the communities and individuals most affected by climate change have equitable access to the benefits of carbon trading.
- Developing more sophisticated IoT devices: Enhancing IoT sensor technology to improve the accuracy and granularity of carbon emission measurements.
- Exploring new blockchain applications: Investigating the use of blockchain for other aspects of carbon management, such as supply chain traceability and carbon footprint analysis.
- Promoting adoption: Encouraging widespread adoption of blockchain and IoT solutions for carbon credit trading, through industry partnerships, government incentives, and public awareness campaigns.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Climate Collective. 2023. Available online: https://climatecollective.io/ (accessed on 18 September 2024).
- UNFCCC. Paris Agreement. 2015. Available online: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement (accessed on 18 September 2024).
- Bauer, N.; Urpelainen, J. Carbon markets: A critical assessment. Environ. Sci. Policy 2017, 67, 12–24. [Google Scholar]
- Brunnermeier, M.K.; Oehmke, M. The maturity of the financial system. J. Financ. 2013, 68, 1903–1940. [Google Scholar]
- ClimateChain. 2021. Available online: https://theclimatechain.com/ (accessed on 18 September 2024).
- IPCC. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis; Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, H.; Guo, L.; Li, Y. Blockchain-enabled Internet of Things for sustainable energy systems: Challenges and opportunities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 39, 309–318. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, Y.; Lu, Q.; Niu, X.; Li, F. Towards a sustainable internet of things: Challenges, opportunities, and future directions. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2020, 58, 106–112. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, L.; Li, X.; Sun, M.; Sun, C. Hybrid Policy-Based Reinforcement Learning of Adaptive Energy Management for the Energy Transmission-Constrained Island Group. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2023, 19, 10751–10762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, Z.; Xu, Y. Data-driven load frequency control for stochastic power systems: A deep reinforcement learning method with continuous action search. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2019, 34, 1653–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shapiro, C.; Varian, H.R. Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy; Harvard Business School Press: Brighton, MA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Tapscott, D.; Tapscott, A. Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin Is Changing Money, Business, and the World; Portfolio Penguin: Middlesex, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Veridium. 2022. Available online: https://veridium.io/ (accessed on 18 September 2024).
- Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.; Yang, L. Blockchain-based carbon emission trading system: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 280, 124408. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J.; Lin, C.C.K.; Lou, F. Verifying carbon credits using blockchain and multi-evidence consensus. Appl. Energy 2019, 253, 113554. [Google Scholar]
- Pilkington, M. Blockchain Technology: Principles and Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, Y.; Wang, X.; Gu, F.; Li, X. A blockchain based DAO for managing carbon credits. Energy 2021, 216, 119290. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.; Wang, Q. A blockchain based carbon credit registry. Int. J. Glob. Energy Issues 2020, 43, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; Lin, X.; Xu, J.; Ma, H. A blockchain-based carbon credit trading platform. Energy Procedia 2020, 173, 313–318. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Cai, H.; Tan, Y. A decentralized carbon credit certification authority based on blockchain. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 278, 123970. [Google Scholar]
- Boumaiza, A. A Blockchain-Based Scalability Solution with Microgrids Peer-to-Peer Trade. Energies 2024, 17, 915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boumaiza, A. Carbon and Energy Trading Integration within a Blockchain-Powered Peer-to-Peer Framework. Energies 2024, 17, 2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boumaiza, A.; Sanfilippo, A. Blockchain For Transactive Energy Marketplace. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 32nd International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), Helsinki, Finland, 19–21 June 2023; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boumaiza, A.; Abbar, S.; Mohandes, N.; Sanfilippo, A. Innovation diffusion for renewable energy technologies. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 12th International Conference on Compatibility, Power Electronics and Power Engineering (CPE-POWERENG 2018), Doha, Qatar, 10–12 April 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boumaiza, A.; Sanfilippo, A. Blockchain-based Local Energy Marketplace Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), Orlando, FL, USA, 4–6 April 2023; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Consumption (kWh) | Carbon Emissions (kg CO2e) | Reward (USD) | Penalty (USD) |
---|---|---|---|
0– 100 | 0–60 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
101–200 | 61–120 | 0.20 | 0.00 |
201–300 | 121–180 | 0.40 | 0.00 |
301–400 | 181–240 | 0.60 | 0.00 |
401–500 | 241–300 | 0.80 | 0.00 |
501–600 | 301–360 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
601–700 | 361–420 | 1.20 | 0.00 |
701–800 | 421–480 | 1.40 | 0.00 |
801–900 | 481–540 | 1.60 | 0.00 |
901–1000 | 541–600 | 1.80 | 0.00 |
>1000 | >600 | 0.00 | 2.00 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Boumaiza, A.; Maher, K. Harnessing Blockchain and IoT for Carbon Credit Exchange to Achieve Pollution Reduction Goals. Energies 2024, 17, 4811. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17194811
Boumaiza A, Maher K. Harnessing Blockchain and IoT for Carbon Credit Exchange to Achieve Pollution Reduction Goals. Energies. 2024; 17(19):4811. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17194811
Chicago/Turabian StyleBoumaiza, Ameni, and Kenza Maher. 2024. "Harnessing Blockchain and IoT for Carbon Credit Exchange to Achieve Pollution Reduction Goals" Energies 17, no. 19: 4811. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17194811
APA StyleBoumaiza, A., & Maher, K. (2024). Harnessing Blockchain and IoT for Carbon Credit Exchange to Achieve Pollution Reduction Goals. Energies, 17(19), 4811. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17194811