Next Article in Journal
Investigation of Thermal and Energy Performance of the Thermal Bridge Breaker for Reinforced Concrete Residential Buildings
Previous Article in Journal
Spotted Hyena Optimization Method for Harvesting Maximum PV Power under Uniform and Partial-Shade Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Novel Step Current Excitation Control Method to Reduce the Torque Ripple of Outer-Rotor Switched Reluctance Motors

1
Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK
2
Department of Electrical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225012, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2022, 15(8), 2852; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15082852
Submission received: 14 March 2022 / Revised: 9 April 2022 / Accepted: 11 April 2022 / Published: 13 April 2022

Abstract

:
Featured in low-speed and high-torque operation, outer-rotor switched reluctance motors (OSRMs) have the potential to be widely deployed in low-speed commuter and logistics vehicle applications. In this paper, a five-phase OSRM and the control method featuring torque ripple reduction has been proposed, which can be applied as the wheel hub motor in the electric vehicles. The simulation was carried out to analyze the OSRM operation. The electromagnetic characteristics of single-phase and two-phase hybrid excitation mode, as well as step current excitation mode, were compared and analyzed. To solve the problem of the large torque ripple of OSRMs under traditional excitation modes, the torque ripple suppression method based on step current excitation was also studied. The experiment design, including motor start-up control, speed control, and torque ripple reduction, are presented to verify the system torque ripple mitigation method.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Hub motor technology integrates vehicle motors with the wheels in order to achieve a variety of driving schemes, such as front-wheel drive, rear-wheel drive and distributed drive. This technology significantly simplifies the speed-transmission structure of electric vehicles (EVs) and offers more space for passengers and cargo in the vehicle. More importantly, hub motor solutions improve controllability of the vehicle. However, the application of hub motor technology requires high control accuracy, which still needs a lot of research and future experimental efforts [1]. Wheel hub motor technology is still under-developed due to the following reasons,
(1)
the wheel hub motor has low power density;
(2)
the torque ripple directly leads to the vibration and imbalance of the wheel;
(3)
the motor works in a rough environment leading to high requirements being placed on the sealing;
(4)
heat dissipation for the wheel hub motor is challenging.
Switched reluctance machines (SRMs) feature simple structures, low manufacturing costs, and high reliability, enabling flexible driving modes which are widely used in buses [2,3]. Outer-rotor switched reluctance motors (OSRMs) can be used as wheel hub motors thanks to their technical advantages of simple structure, high reliability, fault-tolerant modular phase topology, high starting torque, and low starting current. Thus, OSRMs can meet various special requirements through the unified and coordinated design of mechanical and electrical architectures [4]. However, the disadvantages of OSRMs include large torque ripple and noise issues. These shortcomings can be overcome by optimizing the motor body and control scheme [5]. Paper [6] proposes a wireless power transmission (WPT) topology to drive the OSRM, where each OSRM phase is driven by different frequencies according to the rotor position signal. However, this does not solve the large torque ripple problem. Ref. [7] optimizes the torque ripple of the switched reluctance hub motor (SRHM) which is controlled by an asymmetric bridge converter with two diodes per phase. This arrangement eliminates the gear and need for mechanical differentials. In Ref. [8], the proposed SRM consisted of two rotors, namely, the outer rotor and the inner rotor. The displacement of the outer rotor by three degrees can improve the torque characteristics. Additionally, two outer SRMs (an axial flux segment rotor SRM AFSSRM and an axial flux-toothed rotor SRM AFTSRM) were compared for EV applications, and an AFSSRM was found to be more suitable than the AFTSRM in terms of average torque and full load efficiency [9]. Three kinds of outer rotor SRMs were analyzed and compared in terms of electromagnetic design, design optimization, current profile framework, etc., showing that modular and segmented rotor SRMs are superior to conventional configuration motors in terms of specific torque and efficiency [10]. Additionally, SRMs with higher number of rotor poles than stator teeth require higher converter volt-ampere ratings [10]. Two segmented U-shaped single-stator SRMs were designed with inner-rotor and outer-rotor constructions respectively. The characteristics of these two SRMs were approximately equal in terms of machine structure, the influence of rotor structure on the ripple, the flux distributions with different winding polarity configurations, static magnetic characteristics and dynamic performances. So the proposed SDS-SRM (segment-double-stator SRM, SDS-SRM) can improve the torque density and reduce the torque ripple [11].
Ref. [12] introduces and analyzes a three-phase six by eight ORSRM, considering fault evaluation, the amount of eccentricity fault and the direction of fault occurrence. An in-wheel outer-rotor switched reluctance motor (SRM) was developed to be applied in dual-motor independently driven EVs [13]. Ref. [5] proposes the design and analysis of a novel outer-rotor in-wheel SRM. The integration of the motor housing inside the wheel rim saves significant space and eliminates the need for additional mechanical parts used in the centralized drivetrain. A three-phase, external-rotor SRM with 6 stator poles and 10 rotor poles was designed for a representative E-bike. The increased rotor poles yielded improved torque ripple reduction compared more conventional (i.e., 6–4 and 12–8) SRM designs [1].
Many papers discuss the control methods used to reduce SRM torque ripple and other SRM problems. An improved direct torque control (DTC) with a sliding mode controller and observer was developed to reduce the torque ripples of a four-phase SRM in [14]. The proposed SMSC-ADSMO involved an anti-disturbance sliding mode observer (ADSMO) combined with a sliding mode speed controller (SMSC) to build a composite anti-disturbance speed control strategy. A new method based on model predictive flux control (MPFC) was presented to reduce the torque ripple. The torque hysteresis remaining in the SRM was similar to DTC and direct instantaneous torque control (DITC) [15].
This paper presents a control method for OSRM drives, including motor start-up control, speed control, and torque ripple reduction. The torque generation mechanism of the OSRM is analyzed, considering the torque ripple characteristics of single-phase and two-phase hybrid traditional excitation current modes. Additionally, a step current excitation mode is proposed to solve the problem of low torque caused by the single-phase excitation mode and peak torque caused by the two-phase excitation mode. The step current excitation mode has two key parameters, namely, an excitation phase overlapping angle and a current reduction factor. Minimum torque ripple can be obtained by adjusting the parameters of the excitation current reduction factor and the excitation phase overlapping angle.
The paper is organized as follows. OSRM structure and control strategy are presented in Section 2. Section 3 presents the OSRM electromagnetic analysis, including single-phase and two-phase hybrid excitation modes and the torque ripple suppression method of OSRM based on step current excitation. Section 4 introduces the OSRM drive system hardware platform and provides the experiment results of start-up and drive control, mechanical characteristic, speed regulation, and OSRM torque ripple suppression. Finally, Section 5 concludes this paper.

2. OSRM Structure and Control Strategy

The working principle of OSRMs is the same as that of inner-rotor SRMs, which follows low reluctance principle, and the magnetic flux is always closed along the path of minimum reluctance [16]. Switched reluctance drive (SRD) is generally composed of SRM, a power converter, a digital controller, a position sensor, a current sensor and torque sensor, as shown in Figure 1 [17]. The controller detects the relative position between the stator and rotor of SRM from the position signal provided by the position sensor, so as to select the excitation phase. According to the phase current from the current sensor, the current value of the current excitation phase is calculated, and the collected current is converted into digital signal and sent to the controller for calculation. The torque ripple provided by the torque sensor can be used in direct torque control, torque ripple suppression, and output power tests.
In this paper, an 8 kW five-phase 20/16 pole OSRM is considered for theoretical analysis, simulation, and experimental verification. Figure 2a shows the single-phase circuit structure of the motor with an asymmetric half bridge; Figure 2b shows the overall drive circuit, where each phase is independently controlled, leading to high reliability. The torque ripple of OSRM is large, mainly due to the characteristics of commutation excitation. However, the problem of large torque ripple can be solved by optimizing the designs of the motor body and motor control. When the ORSM is applied as the wheel hub motor of an EV, the motor can directly drive the wheel without a traditional power transmission system. Such a design can achieve small volume, high power and high efficiency, simplify the whole vehicle structure, reduce the whole vehicle weight, and is conductive to increasing the speed control range of EVs [18].

3. Microscopic Electromagnetic Analysis of OSRM

This section presents a simulation-based analysis of OSRM using Magnet software. The stator and rotor initial position of the OSRM finite simulation model is shown in Figure 3.
The tangential force contributes to the rotation of the motor. At the commutation time, the inductor current cannot be changed instantaneously, and the tangential force generated by the next excitation phase cannot reach the tangential force generated by the excitation phase before commutation. The decrease in the tangential force is dramatic, leading to torque drop at the commutation time and thereby causing large torque ripple.
At the aligned position, the OSRM normal forces are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction. If the two symmetrical normal forces are different in magnitude, the motor body will be deformed and the noise will be generated. The design of the finite element simulation assumes that the motor structure and electrical parameters are completely symmetrical, but there are errors and wear in the actual motor manufacturing and control operation process, resulting in the imbalance of normal force. The tangential force is analyzed and the method of eliminating torque ripple is studied.

3.1. Single-Phase and Two-Phase Hybrid Excitation Mode

The single-phase and two-phase hybrid excitation mode indicates that one-phase winding or two-phase winding may be excited at the same time. The excitation angle of each phase winding can be calculated by (1) where, if a is small, the time slot of the two-phase excitation is minor or vice versa:
θ 3 = a θ 1 = 2 a π N r m
where a (1 < a < 2) is a constant, Nr is the number of rotor poles, and m is the number of motor phases.
The distribution of magnetic flux and electromagnetic force at different positions of the OSRM in hybrid excitation mode is simulated in Figure 4. The flux density distribution of the hybrid excitation mode are between the single-phase excitation and the two-phase excitation modes at position A, B, and C position. Hybrid excitation mode is the combination of single-phase excitation and two-phase excitation. The angle of single-phase excitation and two-phase excitation depends on the turn-on angle.
The peak values of normal force and tangential force of the hybrid excitation mode at position A are close to those of the single-phase excitation mode and the two-phase excitation mode. At position B, the peak value of normal force of hybrid excitation mode is 3.2 times that of single-phase excitation mode and 0.8 times that of two-phase excitation mode; the peak value of tangential force of hybrid excitation mode is 3.3 times that of single-phase excitation mode and 0.83 times that of two-phase excitation mode; the peak values of normal force and tangential force of the hybrid excitation mode at position C are close to those of the single-phase excitation mode, which is significantly reduced comparing to the two-phase excitation mode.
Hybrid excitation can be view as the combination of the single-phase excitation and two-phase excitation mode, and offer a transitional torque region, which provides an intuitive basis for the study of OSRM torque ripple elimination.

3.2. Torque Ripple Suppression Method of OSRM Based on Step Current Excitation

Considering the large torque ripple in the traditional excitation method, a step current excitation mode is proposed, as shown in Figure 5, where I2 is the rated phase current reference, I1 is the designated portion of the reference current I2, c is the proportional reduction coefficient, and Δθ is the overlap angle of excitation phase between preceding phase and the phase followed. So, I1 indicates the first half of current excitation and I2 indicates the second half of current excitation. Although the step excitation current mode reduces the tangential force of the overlapping part during two-phase excitation through the step current, it can effectively reduce the torque ripple.
The specific subsection expressions of the torque generated on the phase N winding of any OSRM under this excitation mode are given in (2).
T N e = { 0                                       ( θ N 1 θ N < θ Non ) 1 2 K I 1 2                   ( θ Non θ N < θ N 2 ) 1 2 K I 2 2                 ( θ N 2 θ N < θ Noff ) 0                                       ( θ Noff θ N )
where θN2 = θNon + (θNoffθNon)/2 − θ, I1 = cI2 (0 < c < 1), Δθ is the excitation overlap angle, θN1 is the starting position of the minimum inductance of the phase N winding, θon is the turn-on angle of the phase N winding, and θoff is the turn-off angle of the phase N winding, K = dL(θN)/d(θ).
The step current excitation mode reduces the tangential force of the overlapped part via the step current so as to reduce the torque ripple. The tangential electromagnetic force distribution at the same rotor-stator position are extracted. The distribution of the magnetic flux and the tangential force density in the two excitation modes are presented in Figure 6. From the distribution curve of tangential force density, it can be seen that the two-phase excitation mode produces a strong magnetic field during commutation, and the peak value of tangential force is more than twice of the previous tangential force. Compared with the two-phase excitation mode, the step current excitation mode produces uniform tangential force along the sweep contour [15].
The torque versus position curve was simulated, where the speed of OSRM was set as 300 rpm, the rated current I2 was taken as 5 A, finite element simulation is carried out for different c and Δθ, as shown in Figure 7. The optimization process start with tuning of Δθ with each fixed I1 value, as illustrated in Figure 7.
Finite element simulation was carried out for different Δθ and c under the conditions of 300 r/min speed, I2 = 5 A, and I2 = 10 A, respectively. The characteristic curve of △T with Δθ and c is shown in Figure 8, where optimal excitation parameters can be found based on the curved surface. The optimal excitation interval of I2 = 5 A is the surrounding area with c = 0.4 and Δθ = 0.7° as the center, and the optimal excitation interval of I2 = 10 A is the surrounding area with c = 0.4 and Δθ = 0.4° as the center. As can be seen in the step current excitation, the torque ripple of OSRM is affected by the excitation phase overlap angle Δθ and excitation current reduction coefficient c. Adjust Δθ and c synchronously can reduce the torque ripple △T quickly and effectively. New control structures based on this excitation mode and the traditional SRM double closed-loop control method can therefore be proposed. The minimum △T is obtained by adjusting the step current excitation to suppress the torque ripple.
The control block diagram based on step current excitation mode and the traditional SRM double closed-loop control is shown in Figure 9. In the double closed-loop control structure of the outer current loop and the inner speed loop, a torque ripple regulator is added. According to the given speed w*, the calculated Iref and the real-time calculated △T, the optimal Δθ and c are determined, and the minimum △T is obtained by adjusting the stepped current excitation to realize the torque pulsation suppression.
The OSRM torque ripple is larger when using the traditional excitation method because of the characteristics of commutation excitation according to the position information. The torque ripple generated by the new step current excitation is smaller than that generated by the traditional excitation current. The torque ripple regulator is added to the traditional double closed-loop control. The optimal Δθ and c are determined by the given speed w*, the calculated Iref, and the real-time acquisition-calculated ΔT. The minimum ΔT is obtained by adjusting the step current excitation to suppress the torque ripple. The overlap angle of excitation phase Δθ and the factor c are important parameters affecting the torque ripple of OSRM.

4. OSRM Speed Regulation Experiment

4.1. OSRM Drive System Platform

A OSRM drive system platform was built based on the TMS320F28335 micro-controller. According to the position signal read by the photoelectric encoder, the excitation phase was determined. According to the real-time phase current and speed, the corresponding driving signal was calculated and output through the controller. A speed regulation experiment was carried out. The structure block diagram of the speed regulation system of a five-phase 20/16 pole OSRM is shown in Figure 10, and the platform of the speed regulation system prototype is shown in Figure 11. The speed regulation experiment of the five-phase 20/16 pole OSRM included start-up, speed regulation without load, speed regulation with load, mechanical characteristics measurement, and efficiency calculation, which will be presented in the following subsections.
Hardware components and parameters are shown in Table 1.

4.2. Start-Up and Drive Control Experiments

Five seconds before the start-up of OSRM, the soft start was set to limit the current increase rate, that is, the current of each phase was controlled to rise slowly according to the given step, so as to avoid an excessive starting current. The current waveforms of phase A and E during the start-up process are shown in Figure 12, where both phase currents rise in a controlled manner within the limit.
When the speed is higher than the rated speed, CCC (Current Chopping Control) is used for drive control. The phase current waveform and drive signal are shown in Figure 13. The driving signal PWMA of phase A winding corresponds to the phase A current. When IphaseA < Iref, PWMA is 16 V, and IphaseA increases. When IphaseA > Iref, PWMA is −8 V, IGBT is turned off, and IphaseA decreases until IphaseA < Iref. The phase A current can be controlled to track Iref.

4.3. Mechanical Characteristic and Speed Regulation Experiments

The mechanical characteristic curve is shown in Figure 14. Three groups of tests with load and different turn-on angles were carried out for three reference currents Iref. It can be established that using the same power supply, the load carrying capacity with a turn-on angle interval between 10.8° and 17.55° shows best torque performance; where the turn-on interval reaches the maximum limitation. Therefore, the turn-on angle interval between 10.8° and 17.55° was selected for the following speed regulation test experiment and efficiency test.
Since the proposed ORSM is intended to be applied in commuter and logistics applications, the speed range from 100 r/min to 300 r/min was verified in the experiments. The double closed-loop control method of speed outer loop and current inner loop was adopted. Figure 15a shows the speed acceleration experiment without load from 180 r/min to 270 r/min, and Figure 15b shows the deceleration experiment without load from 270 r/min to 180 r/min. The motor phase current was still large after its soft start. When the motor speed reached the reference speed, a non-excitation interval occurred; this usually occurs at start-up and speed regulation.
Figure 16a shows the speed acceleration experiment with a 15 Nm load from 100 r/min to 150 r/min, and Figure 16b shows the deceleration experiment with the same load from 150 r/min to 100 r/min. When the motor starts up and runs stably, the motor can run normally with a load of 15 Nm, with the speed unchanged. In the case with load, the non-excitation interval also appeared during acceleration (and deceleration), and the speed regulation remained stable.

4.4. Torque Ripple Suppression Experiment Based on Step Current Excitation

The proposed control method uses the torque ripple as a feedback signals and suppress it directly via the torque ripple regulator.
Figure 17 shows the experimental results of the OSRM torque ripple characteristics in the traditional current excitation mode and the new step current excitation mode under the state of w = 300 r/min and I2 = 10 A. The traditional excitation current mode produced Vpp = 127.6 mV and T = 5.104 Nm, and the new step excitation current mode produced Vpp = 31.4 mV and ΔT = 1.256 Nm. The experimental results showed that the new step current excitation method can reduce the OSRM torque ripple and further optimize the OSRM torque ripple by adjusting the parameters of the reference current and excitation phase overlap angle [2].

5. Conclusions

In this study, speed control and ripple mitigation research for a five-phase OSRM was carried out. Microscopic level electromagnetic quantities and force density distribution in the OSRM were investigated under conventional single-phase and multi-phase excitation. A new step current excitation method based on a hybrid excitation mode was proposed, where the step amplitude and overlapping angle of the adjacent phases were finely tuned for the best torque-mitigation effect. The prototype machine and its drive testbed are built, and the speed control loop with torque mitigation was implemented on a digital signal controller. Experiments were carried out to verify the soft-start, no-load and load condition operations; these experiments indicated that the OSRM torque ripple was well suppressed under the proposed step current excitation method.
As this research’s main focus was on speed control and torque mitigation, the efficiency of the OSRM only measured at 72.18%, which is within the practical range but is considered low. Another practical issue is the heat dissipation. In this study, OSRM was tested in an open rack condition in which the tire was not installed. Therefore, efficiency improvement with heat dissipation research will be carried out in future study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.W. and W.J.; methodology, J.L.; software, J.W.; validation, S.W. and W.J.; formal analysis, Q.W.; investigation, J.W. and J.L.; resources, W.J. and Q.W.; data curation, J.W.; writing—original draft preparation, J.W.; writing—review and editing, S.W. and W.J.; visualization, B.W.W.; supervision, W.J. and B.W.W.; project administration, W.J.; funding acquisition, W.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Yangzhou city-Yangzhou University Joint Fund under Grant YZ2020169.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lin, J.; Schofield, N.; Emadi, A. External-Rotor 6–10 Switched Reluctance Motor for an Electric Bicycle. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2015, 1, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Edrington, C.S.; Minor, S.P. Design and Analysis of a 5-phase DSRM Drive. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, Arlington, TX, USA, 9–12 September 2007; Volume 364, pp. 364–369. [Google Scholar]
  3. Vandana, R.; Vattikuti, N.; Fernandes, B.G. A Novel High Power Density Segmented Switched Reluctance Machine. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 5–9 October 2008; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, H.; Yan, W. Novel U-Shaped Structure Switched Reluctance Machine With a Module Outer Rotor. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 2017, 28, 5200206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Labak, A.; Kar, N.C. Outer rotor switched reluctance motor design for in-wheel drive of electric bus applications. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE XXth International Conference on Electrical Machines, Marseille, France, 2–5 September 2012; pp. 418–423. [Google Scholar]
  6. Li, Y.; Ding, W.; Song, K.; Bian, H. A New Type of In-Wheel Outer Rotor Switched Reluctance Motor Drive Based on Selective Wireless Power Transfer Technology. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS), Harbin, China, 11–14 August 2019; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ragupathi, C.; Sekar, V.C.; Susitra, D. Rotor position sensing and converter for switched reluctance Hub motor. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Computation of Power, Energy, Information and Communication (ICCPEIC), Chennai, India, 16–17 April 2014; pp. 109–113. [Google Scholar]
  8. Aravind, C.V.; Norhisam, M.; Firdaus, R.N.; Aris, I.; Marhaban, M.H.; Nirei, M. Analysis on the torque characteristics due to outer rotor displacement in the double rotor switched reluctance machine. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems (PEDS), Kitakyushu, Japan, 22–25 April 2013; pp. 773–777. [Google Scholar]
  9. Madhavan, R.; Fernandes, B.G. Comparative analysis of axial flux SRM topologies for electric vehicle application. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES), Bengaluru, India, 16–19 December 2012; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rallabandi, V.; Han, P.; Wu, J.; Cramer, A.M.; Ionel, D.M.; Zhou, P. Design Optimization and Comparison of Direct-Drive Outer-Rotor SRMs Based on Fast Current Profile Estimation and Transient FEA. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2021, 57, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cheng, H.; Liao, S.; Yan, W. Development and Performance Analysis of Segmented-Double-Stator Switched Reluctance Machine. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2021, 69, 1298–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Torkaman, H. Rotor fault analysis and diagnosis in three-phase outer-rotor switched reluctance motor. In Proceedings of the IEEE 4th Annual International Power Electronics, Drive Systems and Technologies Conference, Tehran, Iran, 13–14 February 2013; pp. 93–96. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yaling, W.; Yanliang, X.; Yufang, W.; Yun, Z. Outer-rotor switched reluctance motor and its control system used in electric vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems, Beijing, China, 20–23 August 2011; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sun, X.; Wu, J.; Lei, G.; Guo, Y.; Zhu, J. Torque Ripple Reduction of SRM Drive Using Improved Direct Torque Control With Sliding Mode Controller and Observer. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2020, 68, 9334–9345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xu, A.; Shang, C.; Chen, J.; Zhu, J.; Han, L. A New Control Method Based on DTC and MPC to Reduce Torque Ripple in SRM. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 68584–68593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Peng, F.; Ye, J.; Emadi, A. A Digital PWM Current Controller for Switched Reluctance Motor Drives. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2016, 31, 7087–7098. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ro, H.S.; Lee, K.G.; Lee, J.S.; Jeong, H.G.; Lee, K.B. Torque Ripple Minimization Scheme Using Torque Sharing Function Based Fuzzy Logic Control for a Switched Reluctance Motor. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 2015, 10, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Queval, L.; Coty, A.; Vido, L.; Gottkehaskamp, R.; Multon, B. A Switched Reluctance Motor Drive using Photovoltaic Transistors: Principle, Prototype, Experimental and Numerical Results. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA), Palermo, Italy, 22–25 November 2015; pp. 369–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. SRM speed control system block diagram.
Figure 1. SRM speed control system block diagram.
Energies 15 02852 g001
Figure 2. SRM circuit topology. (a) One phase (the other four phases are similar); (b) Drive circuit.
Figure 2. SRM circuit topology. (a) One phase (the other four phases are similar); (b) Drive circuit.
Energies 15 02852 g002aEnergies 15 02852 g002b
Figure 3. Stator and rotor initial position.
Figure 3. Stator and rotor initial position.
Energies 15 02852 g003
Figure 4. The distribution of magnetic lines of force at different positions and the distribution of electromagnetic force at corresponding positions of OSRM in hybrid excitation mode. (a) Distribution of magnetic flux and shaded plot of flux density at position A in hybrid excitation mode, (b) distribution of normal force at position A in hybrid excitation mode, (c) distribution of tangential force at position A in hybrid excitation mode, (d) distribution of magnetic flux and shaded plot of flux density at position B in hybrid excitation mode, (e) distribution of magnetic flux and shaded plot of flux density at position C in hybrid excitation mode, (f) distribution of normal force at position B in hybrid excitation mode, (g) distribution of tangential force at position B in hybrid excitation mode, (h) distribution of normal force at position C in hybrid excitation mode, (i) distribution of tangential force at position C in hybrid excitation mode.
Figure 4. The distribution of magnetic lines of force at different positions and the distribution of electromagnetic force at corresponding positions of OSRM in hybrid excitation mode. (a) Distribution of magnetic flux and shaded plot of flux density at position A in hybrid excitation mode, (b) distribution of normal force at position A in hybrid excitation mode, (c) distribution of tangential force at position A in hybrid excitation mode, (d) distribution of magnetic flux and shaded plot of flux density at position B in hybrid excitation mode, (e) distribution of magnetic flux and shaded plot of flux density at position C in hybrid excitation mode, (f) distribution of normal force at position B in hybrid excitation mode, (g) distribution of tangential force at position B in hybrid excitation mode, (h) distribution of normal force at position C in hybrid excitation mode, (i) distribution of tangential force at position C in hybrid excitation mode.
Energies 15 02852 g004aEnergies 15 02852 g004b
Figure 5. Proposed stepped excitation method for phase A to E.
Figure 5. Proposed stepped excitation method for phase A to E.
Energies 15 02852 g005
Figure 6. Two excitation modes: (a) the distribution of magnetic flux in two-phase excitation mode; (b) the distribution of magnetic flux in step excitation mode; (c) the tangential force in two-phase excitation mode; (d) the tangential force in step excitation mode.
Figure 6. Two excitation modes: (a) the distribution of magnetic flux in two-phase excitation mode; (b) the distribution of magnetic flux in step excitation mode; (c) the tangential force in two-phase excitation mode; (d) the tangential force in step excitation mode.
Energies 15 02852 g006
Figure 7. Torque characteristics: (a) I1 = 1 A, c = 0.2; (b) I1 = 2A, c = 0.4; (c) I1 = 3 A, c = 0.6; (d) I1 = 4 A, c = 0.8.
Figure 7. Torque characteristics: (a) I1 = 1 A, c = 0.2; (b) I1 = 2A, c = 0.4; (c) I1 = 3 A, c = 0.6; (d) I1 = 4 A, c = 0.8.
Energies 15 02852 g007aEnergies 15 02852 g007b
Figure 8. Torque ripple characteristics corresponding to different Δθ and I1: (a) I2 = 5 A (b) I2 = 10 A.
Figure 8. Torque ripple characteristics corresponding to different Δθ and I1: (a) I2 = 5 A (b) I2 = 10 A.
Energies 15 02852 g008
Figure 9. OSRM Speed-current-torque ripple closed-loop system.
Figure 9. OSRM Speed-current-torque ripple closed-loop system.
Energies 15 02852 g009
Figure 10. Five-phase 20/16 pole OSRM structure block diagram of the speed regulation system.
Figure 10. Five-phase 20/16 pole OSRM structure block diagram of the speed regulation system.
Energies 15 02852 g010
Figure 11. Experimental platform. (a) Machine system; (b) Driver system.
Figure 11. Experimental platform. (a) Machine system; (b) Driver system.
Energies 15 02852 g011
Figure 12. Soft-start current waveform.
Figure 12. Soft-start current waveform.
Energies 15 02852 g012
Figure 13. CCC drive control waveform.
Figure 13. CCC drive control waveform.
Energies 15 02852 g013
Figure 14. Mechanical characteristics: (a) curve of 12.6–17.55° turn-on angle; (b) curve of 11.7°–17.55° turn-on angle; (c) curve of 10.8°–17.55° turn-on angle.
Figure 14. Mechanical characteristics: (a) curve of 12.6–17.55° turn-on angle; (b) curve of 11.7°–17.55° turn-on angle; (c) curve of 10.8°–17.55° turn-on angle.
Energies 15 02852 g014
Figure 15. Speed regulation test without load: (a) speed increasing; (b) speed decreasing.
Figure 15. Speed regulation test without load: (a) speed increasing; (b) speed decreasing.
Energies 15 02852 g015
Figure 16. Speed regulation test with load: (a) speed increasing; (b) speed decreasing.
Figure 16. Speed regulation test with load: (a) speed increasing; (b) speed decreasing.
Energies 15 02852 g016
Figure 17. Torque ripple characteristics: (a) traditional excitation current mode; (b) step excitation current mode.
Figure 17. Torque ripple characteristics: (a) traditional excitation current mode; (b) step excitation current mode.
Energies 15 02852 g017
Table 1. Hardware specifications.
Table 1. Hardware specifications.
ComponentModel
Control chipTMS320F28335
Photoelectric switchITR9606
Photoelectric encoderE6B2-CWZ6C
IGBTFGH40N60
DiodeMUR3060PT
Drive OptocouplerCPL-3120
Electrical ParametersSpecifications
Rated power Pn8 kW
Rated current In20 A
Rated voltage Vn400 V
Rated rotation ωn250 r/min
Phase inductance maximum Lmax130 mH
Phase inductance minimum Lmin30 mH
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, J.; Jiang, W.; Wang, S.; Lu, J.; Williams, B.W.; Wang, Q. A Novel Step Current Excitation Control Method to Reduce the Torque Ripple of Outer-Rotor Switched Reluctance Motors. Energies 2022, 15, 2852. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15082852

AMA Style

Wang J, Jiang W, Wang S, Lu J, Williams BW, Wang Q. A Novel Step Current Excitation Control Method to Reduce the Torque Ripple of Outer-Rotor Switched Reluctance Motors. Energies. 2022; 15(8):2852. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15082852

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Jieyun, Wei Jiang, Shuren Wang, Jingying Lu, Barry W. Williams, and Qianlong Wang. 2022. "A Novel Step Current Excitation Control Method to Reduce the Torque Ripple of Outer-Rotor Switched Reluctance Motors" Energies 15, no. 8: 2852. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15082852

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop